ON THE ANTI-WAR PROTEST IN MANCHESTER

Large but disappointing turn out, whom I would place into three general categories;
1. socialists/communists - all trying to sell books on how great Lenin and Trotsky were (who were both paid German agents, under the control of Rothschild-gofers Warburg and Bethmann-Hollweg, whose 'work' was capitalized upon by the Anglo-American Establishment, see my forthcoming webpage on the Bolshevik Revolution).
2. Islamic pro-Palestinians - who understand the difference between a Jew and a Zionist.
3. general peace-lovers - I believe that war could sometimes be necessary, but based on the history I know most wars have been wars of selfish imperialism or as part of the Albert Pike three-world-war plan.

I was glad to see no sign of anti-Judaism, but lots of anti-Zionism.

Some photos:

The London Peace Train arrives at St Peters Square

The crowd in Albert Square from Clarence St

Rozzers on horses at the back of the march in Albert Square

There was also two helicopters circling over Albert Square, one of which was barely above the City Hall chambers (the building in the left of the picture left), which did a good job in drowning out the speakers.

But it was peaceful, warm and sunny, and lots of placards etc for someone to clean up afterwards.

WATCH ALEX JONES' "TERRORSTORM" FOR FREE

Watch Alex Jones' Terrorstorm for free on Google Video. The quality could be better but it is the information contained and exposed therein that is more crucial. The video exposes government-sponsored false flag terrorism to terrorize us into war and a police state.

FOR ALL AMERICANS

Two films to watch. Remember that the Capitol is named after the Capitoline in Rome which housed the Temple to Jupiter, the Roman God of Gods, and which stands on a hill, in what is now called Washington, which was called Rome for decades before the War of Independence.

1. Gladiator
2. ENRON: The Smartest Guys in the Room

TORTURE WORSE NOW THAN UNDER SADDAM

From http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,,1878099,00.html

Torture in Iraq 'worse than under Saddam'

Staff and agencies
Thursday September 21, 2006
Guardian Unlimited


Torture in Iraq is worse now than it was under the regime of Saddam Hussein and "is totally out of hand", according to a United Nations investigator.
"The situation is so bad many people say it is worse than it has been in the times of Saddam Hussein," said Manfred Nowak, a UN special investigator on torture, at a press conference in Geneva.

He said government forces, private militia and terrorist groups were all involved.

"You have terrorist groups, you have the military, you have police, you have these militias. There are so many people who are actually abducted, seriously tortured and finally killed," said Mr Nowak, an Austrian law professor.

"It's not just torture by the government. There are much more brutal methods of torture you'll find by private militias."

Mr Nowak also said that bodies were being discovered with very heavy and very serious torture marks.

He said a mission to Iraq to investigate torture was too dangerous, but he had gathered information from interviews with people in Amman, Jordan, and other sources.

Mr Nowak is in Geneva to brief the UN Human Rights council - a body that addresses human rights violations - on the situation of the United States detention facility at Guantanamo Bay.

He is one of five UN human rights investigators who in February called for the closure of the camp on the grounds it was a "torture camp". The calls were rejected by the US.

Mr Nowak's comments come a day after the human rights office of the UN assistance mission for Iraq (Unami) raised concerns about the violence gripping the country. It said that 6,599 civilians had died in July and August.

Unami cited increasing evidence of violent torture, a growth in the numbers of death squads, and a rise in the honour killings of women and girls.

"Corpses appear regularly in and around Baghdad and other areas. Most bear signs of torture and appear to be victims of extrajudicial executions," said the report.

CHAVEZ CALLS BUSH THE DEVIL. HOW ACCURATE IS SUCH A STATEMENT?

Chavez spoke to the United Nations yesterday, and while doing so held up a copy of Hegemony or Survival: The Imperialist Strategy of the United States by Noam Chomsky. Chavez said,

It reads easily, it is a very good book, I'm sure Madame [President] you are familiar with it. It appears in English, in Russian, in Arabic, in German. I think that the first people who should read this book are our brothers and sisters in the United States, because their threat is right in their own house.

The devil is right at home. The devil, the devil himself, is right in the house.

"And the devil came here yesterday. Yesterday the devil came here. Right here." [crosses himself] "And it smells of sulfur still today.

Yesterday, ladies and gentlemen, from this rostrum, the president of the United States, the gentleman to whom I refer as the devil, came here, talking as if he owned the world. Truly. As the owner of the world.

I think we could call a psychiatrist to analyze yesterday's statement made by the president of the United States. As the spokesman of imperialism, he came to share his nostrums, to try to preserve the current pattern of domination, exploitation and pillage of the peoples of the world.

Bush is not the devil. Maybe a stooge for, puppet of, gimp of, but not THE devil.

You see, Bush was not alive in the late 18th Century when the following street plan was built, with an inverted, irregular and incomplete pentagram was built into the plan North of the White House, indicating that evil controls the White House.



Bush didn't create the Federal Reserve.
Bush didn't stand by and allow 6 million of his fellow Jews to die at the hands of the Nazis.
Bush didn't order the use of the nuke on Japan in WW2 when Japan had offered to surrender.

Yes, Bush is the public face of something evil controlling America. Would the devil ask for permission to go to the toilet? Er, no.

Perhaps the W in George W Bush stands for Whore, for it appears W has sold himself to the devil.

But then again perhaps there is always a black op sniper following Bush around everywhere he goes just in case he spills the beans live on TV. Perhaps that's why a fictional drama was made in which Bush was assassinated, to 'remind' W of what can be done if he doesn't do what he has been told to do.

SO, MICHAEL, PERHAPS YOU COULD ENLIGHTEN US ON HOW ISRAEL WAS CREATED?

Michael Rubin, resident 'scholar' at The American Enterprise Institute, has published an article entitled, The U.S. vs. Iran, available online at http://www.aei.org/publications/pubID.24915,filter.all/pub_detail.asp . In it he rants and rants about how untrustworthy Iran can be. In fact he goes so far as to say,

...From its very inception, the Islamic Republic has eschewed diplomatic norms.

Even the title is provocative, implying a state of war already exists between the US and Iran.

OK then Mike, tell us how Israel was founded.

Tell us how many people died in the terrorist attack on the King David Hotel on 22nd July 1946.

Tell us how and why the West Bank and Gaza refugee camps formed.

Tell us who attacked the USS Liberty.

Tell us how many nukes Israel has, and why it is not a signatory to the NPT.

Tell us who is the only country to have used the nuke, why you reside in that country, and if that use of the nuke was absolutely necessary or was it just an excuse to show the world what a nuke could do and that therefore we should all cede sovereignty to a world government before a nuclear war occured.

You and your lot really are a bunch of warmongering, profiteering, megalomaniac thugs who have no idea, or couldn't care less, that you are being used to start World War 3.

ISRAELI INTELLIGENCE KNEW OF IMPENDING KIDNAP

Well, well. Just days before 12th July Israeli Intelligence knew of an impending kidnap on the Lebanese border but that intelligence was 'mishandled'.

From http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/763676.html

Probe: MI knew Hezbollah was about to nab troops

By Amir Oren, Haaretz Correspondent

Military Intelligence had clear information about an impending kidnap attempt by Hezbollah shortly before the Lebanese group carried out its cross-border raid on July 12. However, the information - which could, if properly handled, have prevented the kidnapping of Eldad Regev and Ehud Goldwasser - was not analyzed and passed on to the troops in time, according to an internal inquiry conducted by the Israel Defense Forces.

The IDF Spokesman's Office, asked about this report, has refused to either confirm or deny it for the last three days, saying that the issue is still being investigated by Military Intelligence (MI) and the Northern Command.

The inquiry into the intelligence aspects of the kidnapping is being conducted by Brigadier General Avi Ashkenazi, who was appointed by -utgoing GOC Northern Command Udi Adam. But even though his investigation which could alter the entire picture of the abduction - is not yet completed, he is slated to present his report to Chief of Staff Dan Halutz and other senior IDF officers this week.

9/11 : FIVE YEARS ON

Approximately 3000 people died on 9/11.

Four hijacked planes flew around US airspace for over an hour and a half, when Cheney was in charge of several terror drills which virtually mirrored the hijackings. One of these hijacked planes allegedly flew into the Pentagon, after performing some incredible manouevres, killing a number of accounting and auditing staff who may well have been asked to trace the $2 trillion Rumsfeld announced the day before was 'missing'.

The alleged perpetrators were Osama bin Laden, and his sidekick Saddam Hussein. But now the FBI have stopped looking for ObL because of "a lack of evidence".

In the meantime, hundreds of billions have been spent on the military.

The Afghanistan opium harvest is at record levels.

Cheney's sugar daddy Halliburton was awarded many no-bid contracts, and Cheney received kickbacks.

Iraq has been laid to waste and is collapsing into civil war.

Sure the evil dictator Saddam is now in the dock, but there is now talk of installing a new Iraqi dictator. And the USA is building the most fantastic embassy in Baghdad, with swimming pools and air conditioning, while on the streets outside Iraqis are at each others throats.

Hundreds of thousands of dead civilians in Iraq, either blown to bits by the US military, or tortured to death by rival death squads in the civil war.

US Marines facing the death penalty for wanton murder and rape, while Bush wants the US military exempt from prosecution for crimes against humanity.

University professors are threatened with losing their jobs, or are placed on paid leave, if they question the official version of the events of 9/11.

Civilians are kidnapped by the CIA anywhere in the world, and flown to secret prisons and tortured.

There is talk of a long, long war run out of the USA, to hunt down and kill the terrorists, to shmoke 'em out, when the terrorists were fostered in London, or given flying lessons at US Naval schools.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A few months ago Israel invaded Lebanon, to rescue, so they said, two Israeli soldiers who had been kidnapped by Hizb Allah (there is some dispute over exactly where the soldiers were kidnapped).

A month or so before this Corporal Gilad Shalit was kidnapped by Palestinian militants.

So Israel went to war in Lebanon. Lebanon was bombed into the third world. The Lebanese infrastructure was destroyed. There was yet another massacre at Qana, the victims were again women and children. Thousands of civilians were killed. Strange weapons were used by Israel. Cluster bombs. DU. Phosphorus.

Another silent war was waged in the occupied territories.

That war went on for 33 days.

And after all that, the three soldiers were still held captive.

But after a few weeks of talking, of negotiations, it now appears Corporal Shalit is being released in a prisoner exchange between the Palestinians and Israel.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

So five years ago, we witnessed the most horrific terrorist event the world had ever seen. Immediately two men were blamed and targeted; Osama bin Laden and Saddam Hussein.

Instead of creating an honest truth-seeking investigative team to discover what exactly happened, and find out what the suspected perpetrators wanted, the USA went on a bloodlust, and only after some armtwisting was an investigation panel assembled, which was to be controlled by none other than Dr Henry 'Strangelove' Kissinger!!

It is only now seeping into the mainstream media that bin Laden is no longer wanted for 9/11, and that Iraq also had nothing to do with 9/11.

So, who dunnit?

Five years of bullshit.

Five years of spilled blood.

Five years of lies.

Five years of 100% pure corruption.

And still they want more.

Next stop, Iran.

WHAT HAPPENS IF THE USA BOMBS IRAN AND THINGS GET A BIT MAD?

Blair is to go in a year.

Out with the old Bilderberger, in with the new Bilderberger.

Meet the new Bilderberger. Same as the old Bildberger.

etc, etc.

But in the meantime, what if the USA, and even the UK, decide Iran deserves a good whoopin' and bomb Iran. In 'retaliation', from Iran, or al-Qaeda or Santa Claus, terrorism, be it genuine or false-flag, hits Britain's streets again in a big way, and Bliar, despite him really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really wanting to go, declares a state of emergency?

WHAT THEN?

ON THE ALLEGED ATLANTIC PLANE TERROR PLOT

Nafeez does it again!

The author of "The London 7/7 Bombings : An Independent Inquiry" has published the New York Times article on the alleged Atlantic Plane Terror Plot, which was not allowed to be published in the UK, and also analyzes the contents and the implications of the article.

Please spread far and wide.

From http://nafeez.blogspot.com/

CENSORED: The NY Times "Terror Plot" Expose They Don't Want You to Read
This is a special post for my fellow Brits.

On 28th August 2006, the New York Times printed an investigative story on that month’s 10/8 “terror plot”, undermining the claims of US and British government officials, and suggesting that details had been exaggerated beyond all proportion for political reasons. The article was also published online.

But interested British readers quickly discovered that they had been denied access to the article. Instead they discovered the following web message:

“This Article Is Unavailable

On advice of legal counsel, this article is unavailable to readers of nytimes.com in Britain. This arises from the requirement in British law that prohibits publication of prejudicial information about the defendants prior to trial.”

Even printed copies of the newspaper destined for the UK were scrubbed. Apparently for strictly legal reasons.

In fact, the New York Times’ decision to self-censor its own expose from the British readership is, like the “terror plot” itself, more likely to have been based on reasons of political expedience.