Pages

Monday, June 23, 2008

PRISONERS AND OFFENDERS TO BE MICROCHIPPED

Just like I proposed the abduction of Madeleine McCann would be followed by calls to microhip children, the planned overcrowding of the prisons system would be followed by calls to microchip prisoners, particuarly after it had been demonstrated that tagging would not work (as planned).

They want that 'chip in you. They want total control of you. The 'chip will do more, alot more, than track you to give you a sense of safety.

How could the problem of prison overcrowding have suddenly appeared? The answer is it didn't. It takes years, and it was all planned to create a problem for which a solution, their solution, would be implemented.

This is what was discussed at Bilderberg this year.

This is not a joke.

They are after you.

=======================================

From http://www.naturalnews.com/023481.html

(NaturalNews) The British government is developing a plan to track current and former prisoners by means of microchips implanted under the skin, drawing intense criticism from probation officers and civil rights groups.

As a way to reduce prison crowding, many British prisoners are currently released under electronic monitoring, carried out by means of an ankle bracelet that transmits signals like those used by mobile phones.

Now the Ministry of Justice is exploring the possibility of injecting prisoners in the back of the arm with a radio frequency identification (RFID) chip that contains information about their name, address and criminal record. Such chips, which contain a built-in antenna, could be scanned by special readers. The implantation of RFID chips in luggage, pets and livestock has become increasingly popular in recent years.

In addition to monitoring incarcerated prisoners, the ministry hopes to use the chips on those who are on probation or other conditional release. By including a satellite uplink system in the chip, police would be able to use global positioning system (GPS) technology to track subjects' exact locations at all times. According to advocates of such a measure, this could help keep sex offenders away from "forbidden" zones like schools.

Harry Fletcher, assistant general secretary of the National Association of Probation Officers, blasted the measure as degrading to the people chipped and of no benefit to probation officers.

"Knowing where offenders like pedophiles are does not mean you know what they are doing," Fletcher said. "Treating people like pieces of meat does not seem to represent an improvement in the system to me."

Shami Chakrabarti of the civil rights group Liberty had even stronger words:

"If the Home Office doesn't understand why implanting a chip in someone is worse than an ankle bracelet, they don't need a human-rights lawyer; they need a common-sense bypass."

No comments:

Post a Comment