HIGGINS TWEETS EVIDENCE THAT MH17 SHOT DOWN BY A POINT BUT WITNESS SAYS IT CAME FROM BEHIND MH17

In his excitement he may have missed the bit that it came from behind.

But also what is this "point"?

Is it a missile, or is it just that what ever it was, possibly a fighter jet, was that far away that it was viewed as a point, a dot?

Anyway, the witness shows with his hands how the missile/plane hit MH17: it came from behind/from the side, not head on, which would have happened if the missile had been fired from his proposed location of 5 Km south of Shnizhne.

Here is the tweet. Watch the guy talk about the "point" climb into the sky. But please take note of how the missile/plane hit MH17. IT CAME FROM BEHIND!!! And behind means much more likely to be Ukraine Armed Forces.

Missed this video before, but this Paris Match video interviews a witness of the #MH17 shoot down 1/3 https://t.co/Jt3BlDlK15

— Eliot Higgins (@EliotHiggins) May 10, 2015

Here is how the witness describes how the point/missile/plane hit MH17 translated into French (taken from the video).

ensuite j'ai vu au loin comme un point dans le ciel. Je l'ai vu grimper dans le nuage et bang. C'est rentre dans le nuage on le voyait plus. Et apres on a entendu l'explosion. L'avion venait de ce cote, et allait vers la bas en Malaise. Il volait dans la direction de Rostov. L'autre il etait derriere et il est alle comme ca. Souvenouz vous qu'il faisait nuageux ce jour la. Moi j'ai juste vu le truc qui grimpait vers le nuage.

Here is the google translation of that French.

Then I saw in the distance as a point in the sky. I saw him climb into the cloud and bang. It is returned in the cloud could be seen the most. And after we heard the explosion. The aircraft had on that side, and going downwards in Malaysia. It flew in the direction of Rostov. The other was behind it and it has gone as ca. Souvenouz sure it was cloudy that day. I just saw the thing that climbed to the cloud.

Note that the witness never says "missile", and that after describing MH17 by "l'avion" the witness uses the word "l'autre" to describe whatever it was he saw. "L'autre" means "the other". The other plane? The other object?

But whatever "l'autre" was, IT CAME FROM BEHIND MH17!!

I take this verbal description and the way in which the guy uses his hands to completely destroy the thesis that MH17 was hit by a missile head on, i.e. from Shnizhne.

NO WONDER SOCIAL MEDIA EXPERT NEVER KNEW ABOUT THIS!! They've been trying to keep it quiet because it destroys everything NATO has been saying!!

This totally contradicts the US State Dept image below (which I have always mocked).