Pages

Friday, July 31, 2015

MH17 : WHERE COULD A BUK MISSILE HAVE BEEN LAUNCHED FROM?

Let's just recall the launch sites of a BUK missile that could have struck MH17 that have been proposed by the pro-Kiev side, because there isn't just one:
1. within a few hours of MH17 falling out of the sky, the Ukraine Security Service published a video on Youtube that that they said proved 100% beyond doubt that Cossacks at Chernukino had shot down MH17;
2. Belling Cat, RTL Niuews and others claim that a missile was launched from a field 5 Km south of Shnizhne;
3. the USA also claims that a missile was fired from south of Shnizhne, but it may be from a different field claimed by Belling Cat;
4. Der Spiegel and Correctiv claim that a missile was launched from a field 3 Km north of Shnizhne.

So we have 4 proposed launch sites, all with 'evidence' to support their proposal: the Ukraine Security Service video is based on intercepted phone calls (but cobbled together); Belling Cat's prime initial evidence was a photograph taken by a Kiev Nazi sympathiser; the USA released a schoolboy image which was cobbled together from many satellite images and coloured lines were drawn on to to show the trajectories of MH17 and the alleged missile; Der Spiegel based their proposal on 'eyewitnesses'.

But if, as Belling Cat believe, MH17 was shot down from 5 Km south of Shnizhne, then can they trust the Ukraine Security Service, or indeed 'eyewitnesses' as Der Spiegel have done?

So we now need to ask, how many BUK missiles were fired on 17th July 2014?

And if only one then who is lying and/or providing fake evidence?

Well, here is a clue: there is a well known video of a BUK being transported through Luhansk with a missile missing. The Ukraine Security Service claim that the video was filmed at 0500 on 18th July 2014. But the Ukraine Counterintelligence Chief Naida told a press conference that the BUK that they claimed had shot down MH17 was probably in Russia by 0200, and by 0400 at the latest on 18th July 2014. And to add to the suspicion of the Ukraine authorities (who at that time were still a Nazi junta installed by a NATO/NED puppet), just as MH17 was falling out of the sky, Colonel Andriy Lysenko was telling a press conference that Ukraine had videos of the separatists in possession of a BUK. If so, then why did Ukraine not shut down the airspace over Ukraine? Or is Lysenko lying too?

But if you also consider that:
1. the Netherlands was a founding member of NATO and wants Ukraine as a member (as agreed at the NATO summit at Bucharest in 2008), and that after the NATO-sponsored-and-protected coup during 2014, Ukraine is making moves to become a member of NATO, and that there existed and still exists agreements to veto any evidence;
2. the darling of the NATO media, Eliot Higgins, has been sponsored by The Atlantic Council (which was created by the same men who created NATO), and that Higgins also has projects with George Soros and USAID (CIA);

then we have the potential for a total stitch up.

This is why there needs to be a fully open and transparent, independent and international investigation into MH17, not a kangaroo court based on biased evidence with a predetermined verdict.

No comments:

Post a Comment