HOW CAN MI5 BE SO INCOMPETENT?

The truth is they are not.

The Sunday Times today has an article by David Leppard entitled, "Agent says MI5 dismissed Hamza as ‘harmless clown’".

MI5 had an agent inside Finsbury Park mosque called Reda Hassaine. Hassaine was telling his MI5 handler, Steve, that Abu Hamza
"was brainwashing people and sending them to terrorist training camps in Afghanistan, that he was preaching jihad and murder and that he was involved in the provision of false passports. I told them he was a chief terrorist,”. .

But apparently MI5 thought Hamza a 'harmless clown'!

According to Leppard
Hassaine said he even offered to wear a small camera and recording device while he was inside the mosque talking to Hamza and fellow militants. “They [MI5] told me not to bother, that they weren’t interested.”

Recall a few weeks ago the leak to the same newspaper The Sunday Times that Mohammed Siddique Kahn had been placed under surveillance after returning from a known terrorist training camp and was heard talking of joining the Jihad and committing fraud to raise funds for terrorism. But Kahn was not deemed a threat to national security and the surveillance was allegedly removed. MI5 had bigger fish to catch, apparently (I suggest anti-war movement, anti-GM protestors etc).

Since that leak it has been learned that Saudi Arabia had warned MI5 of a terrorist attack on the London Underground shortly before 7/7 and that Kahn may have been involved. And yet a week after the leak on the surveillance of Kahn another leak claimed MI5 had run out of leads and didn't know what to do next.

Is this incompetence?

Can you not see a pattern developing?

This is the secret organisation tasked with defending the realm. It has access to unbelievable surveillance technology and has had for years. They keep terrorising us with warnings that catastrophic terror is just around the corner and claiming they need more money and power to stop it. But in the last month or so it has become crystal clear that MI5 cannot be this incompetent, and must be allowing the terror to occur. They and their masters have everything to gain from this; a police state.

Too much terror and the general public will ask questions. Too little terror and we, the ordinary tax-paying public, have lots and lots of freedom and happiness.

But the odd terror event, the Goldilocks event, is just right.

When I first heard of the BBC series "Spooks" I thought, aye, aye, here's a bit of propaganda. In "Spooks" the intelligence services were honourable, incorruptable and always got their man/woman. Our country is in safe hands, was the message.

WHAT A LOAD OF BOLLOCKS!

In The Sunday Times Amir Tahiri argues that Great Britain has become a haven for Islamic political parties and movements that would be banned in much of the Arab world. London has been known as Londonistan for years. But this association of London and international terror is not new. Webster Tarpley argues, and what research I have done confirms, that during the 19th century Great Britain was inspiring and fostering the international terror movements that swept across Europe and Russia assassinating royalty and ministers of state while sweet FA occured in Great Britain. This international terrorism played a major part in expanding the British Empire's global control.

I am no supporter of the BNP, but we must compare this latest claim from Reda Hassaine with the treatment of the BNP. The BNP was infiltrated by a BBC reporter and its leadership secretly filmed talking candidly of their feelings and views on Islam. A documentary of this was shown on the BBC and charges of inciting racial hatred were made against the BNP leadership, which have since been dismissed. And yet there are several Islamic extremist papers inciting terrorism which are available by mail order. In an article entitled "Business as Usual in the UK" published in Front Page Magazine 20th July 2005 and available at
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=18830

Dr Rachel Ehrenfeld wrote of the Islamic extremism based in the UK, and named several publications inciting terrorism and suicide bombings (though how Ehrenfeld, as a member of the neoconservative Committee on Present Danger cannot see why these publications are permitted is beyond me).

But I ask you, why are these publications allowed to be published, sold and distributed in the UK, while documentaries on the BNP trying to expose their leadership as Islamophobes are shown on the BBC leading to trials of incitement to racial hatred?

It does not make sense, does it?

YES IT DOES!!

It is the argument of myself, and many others, that international Islamic terrorism was being protected and was allowed to grow here in the UK for the benefit of a few people, the same people who brought us World Wars 1 and 2, and are about to kick off World War 3 through this terrorism. This clamping down on Islamic extremism is only for show. The genie is out the bottle now. We've had 9/11 and 7/7.

Is there anything we as ordinary members of the public can do to stop this?