In the next front page summary half an hour later The Daily Express was not even mentioned or even shown!!
So I went onto t'internet and to the website of The Daiy Express. And all became crystal clear. For the photo was indeed of Diana, and the headline accompanying the photo of Diana was
DIANA predicted her own 'murder' time and time again in the few years before her death, says the official report.
And it became even clearer why the BBC was avoiding The Daily Express because within the article based on the official Stevens report are the many tales from friends of Diana who told Stevens that Diana had told them about her fear for her own life, and for those around her. I found this excerpt particularly damning;
...Another of Diana’s close friends, Simone Simmons, gave the inquiry evidence which backs up the Princess’s belief that she was being targeted.
According to the report, she said Diana telephoned her in 1995 to say that the brakes had failed on her car and she was convinced they had been tampered with.
She later received a hand-written note from Diana which read: “Dear Simone, as you know, the brakes of my car have been tampered with. If something does happen to me it will be MI5 or MI6 who will have done it. Lots of love Diana.”
Her former lover, the surgeon Hasnat Khan, also told the inquiry that the Princess had informed him she had been forced to change her car because the brakes on her usual vehicle had been tampered with.
Another of Diana’s former lovers, James Hewitt, said that during his relationship with the Princess he had received threatening phone calls from an unidentified male caller who warned him not to contact her any more.
We can't have kids eating their cornflakes at the breakfast table learning that Diana has accused MI5 and MI6 from beyond the grave can we? Particularly as it is only a week before Christmas.
Now what happened to that Mercedes which Diana was in when it crashed in Pont D'Alma...? As I recall, reps/engineers of Mercedes themselves were denied access to it, to thoroughly check it out, I believe because something had been done/added to it.
The very bright flash, the suspicious men running into and away from the crash scene before emergency services arrived, the crash scene quickly cleaned and scrubbed thus destroying vital evidence while at the same time it took the ambulance 3 hours to take Diana past several adequate hospitals, the first photos of the crash have not been released, Diana was engaged to Muslim Dodi on the brink of "Islam v the rest of the world" clash of civilizations, she was about to go public on the real Windsors, Stevens' laptop being stolen, etc, etc, etc.
Then there's the date the report was released, just before the busiest shopping weekend of the year, and Blair was questioned on that date, the first PM in office to be questioned in relation to an ongoing criminal investigation,...
It's going to take many more millions of pounds and more years of "investigation" to convince me Diana wasn't murdered.
Tomlinson is wee bit peeved about Stevens.
ReplyDeleteFrom http://www.express.co.uk/news_detail.html?sku=900
Speaking to the Sunday Express from his home in the south of France, Tomlinson was furious with the way his evidence appeared in in Lord Stevens’s report. He said last night: “The report put words in my mouth that I never used. I gave them detailed information about the Milosevic plan for an assassination.
“They told me in a subsequent interview they had checked and found the document outlining the plan exactly where I said it was.
“They confirmed it was accurate. However, in the Stevens report it is claimed I admitted that the plan did not refer to Milosevic but to someone else. This is a crude attempt by the intelligence service to cover up the truth.”
Then there's the radio silence, the CCTV images (or lack thereof), etc, etc, etc...