CREATING PRESIDENTS TO FOLLOW INTO WAR?

There is a line in the Gervais/Merchant "The Office" (series 1 I think) in which Gareth is talking about leaders, and how a military leader respected by his soldiers would create such a strong feeling of loyalty within them that they would gladly follow him to their certain death. I am wondering if a similar operation in mass psychology has been applied before successfully, and is now being applied again.

I am intrigued by the argument "FDR : Was He NWO, or Wasn't He NWO?".

The people at EIR present a reasonable argument that FDR wasn't NWO, although I am not 100% convinced.

FDR deliberately provoked and allowed the Pearl Harbour attack to happen (the December 1941 one, not the September 2001 one), a fact which is ignored.

The people at EIR present evidence that FDR took on the British-based bankers controlling America and was the subject of a fascist coup exposed by Captain Butler. However, Antony C Sutton in "Wall Street and FDR" presents a convincing case to me that FDR was a servant of Wall Street, receiving much more financial backing from Wall Street for his Presidential campaigns than his opponents. Sutton's other two "Wall Street" books reinforce the great significance that 120 Broadway had during the years 1910 - 1945. I am thus beginning to think that FDR's actions, and those that involved him eg the Butler Affair, were an act of window dressing to manufacture FDR as a President the general public of the USA could trust and would gladly follow into a major world war.

But I am also beginning to think the same trick could have been used to manufacture President Putin of Russia. Whether Putin is aware of this I am not sure.

They both came to power following severe economic conditions.
FDR came to power after the Great Depression.
Putin came to power after Russia had been brutally economically raped.

They then made moves which gave the appearance they wanted justice.
FDR apparently went after Wall Street through Ferdinand Pecora (which resulted in how many prosecutions?).
Putin apparently went after the Russian Oligarchs, but has so far, after years of trying, only one in prison, perhaps as a sacrificial lamb; Khordokhovsky.

What I can't understand about FDR is, if he really was anti-NWO why did he not "kill the Fed"? Did he lobby for a substitute for The Federal Reserve? Was it one of the acts passed in the first 100 days? Apparently not. Yes, it appears FDR did do something against the Wall Streeters, but not as much as he could have done being President and with such popular support. Instead, as Sutton proves, FDR was a product of Wall Street, had substantial business links with Wall Street, kept the basic parasitical Federal Reserve System in tact and in some ways increased its stranglehold over the US economic system, and the New Deal, which was a product of Bernard Baruch, was very profitable for Wall Street. And he then provoked Japan into attacking Pearl Harbour in connivance with his alleged enemy Winston Churchill, which led America to borrow ridiculous sums of paper money from the Federal Reserve owned by the same bankers FDR apparently detested, thus empowering them even more! And the whole Swope/General Electric cartel/GE German factories avoiding Allied strategic bombing thing looks very, very suspicious, particularly with FDRs Wall Street history.

Putin's rise to power is different, but similar. He emerged from Yeltsin's government under the tutelage of Berezovsky as a product of the intelligence services. He was appointed Prime Minister by Yeltsin and Yeltsin indicated he wanted Putin as his succesor. Upon Yeltsin's surprise resignation Putin became President, a position he has since held. Yeltsin was a puppet of the oligarchs. Putin then apparently began to change the script and went after the oligarchs, and rewriting energy contracts to get Russia more.

I am a believer in the 3-world-war strategy of the NWO, and that a strong Russia is necessary for that final third war. WW2 was about getting a world government established, which the USA would need to accept, and what better way than to convince the USA that a world government was required than to involve it in a 6 year long bloody world war! Putin is serving the WW3 agenda in two ways;
1. by slowly taking back some, but interestingly not all, of Russia's natural resources, Russia is now a military and economic force, but also Russia is now feeling it has something not only to defend but also to regain after suffering humiliation.
2. by doing this Putin is becoming a new FDR, someone the Russian people could adore and would gladly follow into a major war.

I read yesterday that Russia is threatening a new Cold War, in response to the betrayal by NATO ie the Anglo-Americans, in siting missiles and radar in Poland and the Czech Republic. NATO ie the Anglo-Americans, should never, ever be trusted, only when it has been disbanded. But does Putin really need to crank up the rhetoric? Does he really have to rush into that and place himself in a position from which he cannot escape. Why the aggression when a simple published letter explaining the state of affairs would do much more?

If Putin really was anti-NWO, which I thought was a possibility, what could and should he do? I have given a hint in a draft letter to the American people. So far such a letter has not been published.

I read in EIR that images and references to FDR are all over Russia, and have been for years. This would indicate to me that whichever side FDR was really on then Putin is probably working for the same side, wittingly or unwittingly. If he wants to borrow my copies of Sutton's Wall Street trilogy as well as Sutton's "National Suicide" he is welcome. In fact, so are George W Bush and Tony Blair!