Many people believed that the paparazzi were the cause of Diana's death. Last night you saw the outrage of the public towards any one with a camera shortly after her death.
So why were the photographers immediately blamed? And by whom?
It is classic diversion, to allow whoever really killed her to escape. Blame someone you know who is totally innocent, put them through the ordeal of a trial over a period of time while the shock of the incident dissipates, and then find the initial suspects innocent.
It took two years to clear those photographers who were arrested and charged. TWO YEARS.
My thesis on the Diana murder? I think there was a plot to destroy the relationship between Diana and Dodi. If that had blossomed into something stronger, maybe marriage, maybe even children, then the Islam v Zionism WW3 as planned would be seriously derailed. Something had to happen. Whether it was intended both Diana and Dodi die I am not sure, but I am convinced something had to happen to destroy that relationship between Dodi and Diana. And the Royal Family's immediate reaction to the death says a hell of a lot to me.
You saw last night, and I can't remember his name, that someone shortly after the crash had been "targeted" was the phrase they used, in which "someone" had entered their house with a key and searched their files but without threat to life. Someone was keen to find out if there were any photos that could show anything compromising. Who would have the power and skill to enter someone's house with a key and rummage through files to find potentially compromising photographs?
In the latest cover-up Lord Stevens had his computer containing his report stolen from his office. Other photographers had their houses and offices broken into too. I believe it was a cover-up because the Stevens report stated that Diana and Dodi had not bought an engagement ring yet the vendor of that ring provided a sales record and CCTV footage of the purchase! The vendor also claims he was threatened by the "investigators". Of course, details like this were ignored because on the day of the release of the Stevens report Bliar was questioned by the Police about the Cash-for-peerages scandal, which became more important for whatever reason, so that all the media had to report was that Stevens found no conspiracy.
So what sort of evidence could have been photographed?
Several witnesses speak of a very bright flash coming from the tunnel a second or two before they heard the crash. This would be consistent with a plot that was hatched to kill Milosevic, in which a bright flash would temporarily blind the driver of a vehicle travelling at high speed. There were also witnesses who say they saw a man run towards the tunnel immediately after the crash, take a quick scan of the scene and then run off.
There is something that really stinks about Dians's death. Really, really stinks. As with 9/11, significant witnesses and evidence are ignored. And as with 9/11 some of the "suicide" hijackers are still alive, while with Diana the paparazzi were charged but found not guilty.
Last night's documentary was useful in that we now saw in photographs that despite the initial allegations the paparazzi had nothing to do with the death of Diana, and that "someone" was keen to suppress photographs of the death and crash scene from reaching the public eye by blaming them.
We have to ask: why?
No comments:
Post a Comment