CFR Gary Hart has apparently exposed part of the whole scam in an open letter posted on a well-respected internet site, The Huffington Post.
In that letter Hart refers to several events which were engineered to drag the USA into war. He even hints, but does not explicitly state, that Pearl Harbour also belongs to this set of events.
Presuming that you are not actually ignorant enough to desire war with the United States, you might be well advised to read the history of the sinking of the U.S.S. Maine in Havana harbor in 1898 and the history of the Gulf of Tonkin in 1964.
Having done so, you will surely recognize that Americans are reluctant to go to war unless attacked. Until Pearl Harbor, we were even reluctant to get involved in World War II.
Maybe Hart is breaking ranks and is trying to raise the alarm of yet another engineered event.
Maybe he just lost it.
Let's see what happens to Hart now. He is on the fringe of the circles of power. He is on the advisory board of the Partnership for a Secure America, with such illuminaries as Zbigniew Brzezinski and Richard Holbrooke, as well as the 9/11 gatekeepers Kean and Hamilton, although Kean and Hamilton are now expressing doubts about the official 9/11 myth.
I dunno. Maybe there is a something going on at the PSA? Didn't Brzezinski recently also issue a warning of a false flag attack too?
============================================================
From http://www.huffingtonpost.com/gary-hart/unsolicited-advice-to-the_b_65984.html
Unsolicited Advice to the Government of Iran
Posted September 26, 2007 | 03:22 PM (EST)
Read More: Gulf of Tonkin, iran, provoking Iran, Breaking Politics News
Presuming that you are not actually ignorant enough to desire war with the United States, you might be well advised to read the history of the sinking of the U.S.S. Maine in Havana harbor in 1898 and the history of the Gulf of Tonkin in 1964.
Having done so, you will surely recognize that Americans are reluctant to go to war unless attacked. Until Pearl Harbor, we were even reluctant to get involved in World War II. For historians of American wars the question is whether we provoke provocations.
Given the unilateral U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003, you are obviously thinking the rules have changed. Provocation is no longer required to take America to war. But even in this instance, we were led to believe that the mass murderer of American civilians, Osama bin Laden, was lurking, literally or figuratively, in the vicinity of Baghdad.
Given all this, you would probably be well advised to keep your forces, including clandestine forces, as far away from the Iraqi border as you can. You might even consider bringing in some neighbors to verify that you are not shipping arms next door. Tone down the rhetoric on Zionism. You've established your credentials with those in your world who thrive on that.
If it makes you feel powerful to hurl accusations at the American eagle, have at it. Sticks and stones, etc. But, for the next sixteen months or so, you should not only not take provocative actions, you should not seem to be doing so.
For the vast majority of Americans who seek no wider war, in the Middle East or elsewhere, don't tempt fate. Don't give a certain vice president we know the justification he is seeking to attack your country. That is unless you happen to like having bombs fall on your head.
No comments:
Post a Comment