Westlaw cases database cites only two uses of the FSMA 2000 S. 3, one being the insolvent 'boiler room' operation, the other completely unrelated to my argument.
Initial research into the use of the other legislation I believe is applicable is indicating no application of it has been made in the way I believe it could be.
Why is this?
Because most of us, lawyers included, are unaware of the use of fractional reserve banking, and so do not use it in any argument.
The people who do know that fractional reserve banking goes on behind the green door are banking lawyers. And what banking lawyer in his or her right mind is going to expose the scam in court, and lose his or her job?
You see. They know it goes on, but daren't expose the scam by applying legal arguments to refer to it.
This is going to be fun. But not for them.
I have mapped out their possible defences and blocking arguments to not have a case heard, and any Judge who agrees with them will be shown to be a complete fraud, and will be suspected of being a blackmailed paedophile freemason.
No comments:
Post a Comment