The failure of a jury to convict three men today of aiding the alleged 7/7 bombers indicates that the evidence against them was weak.
And if that is the case, then how can we trust the unproven case against the alleged 7/7 bombers?
Maybe the evidence presented was deliberately weak to provoke a hung jury and thus delay any inquiry.
Either way, we need an open public inquiry into who knew what and when regarding the alleged bombers and the attack itself.
No comments:
Post a Comment