Pages

Monday, January 05, 2009

GAZA : IT WAS PLANNED LONG AGO. WANT PROOF?

You are not going to believe this, and it comes straight from the Israeli horse's mouth!

Below is a graph showing the rocket fire from Gaza into Israel.

IT COMES STRAIGHT FROM THE ISRAELI MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS!

[source : http://www.mfa.gov.il/MFA/Terrorism-+Obstacle+to+Peace/Hamas+war+against+Israel/Behind+the+Headlines-+Calm+in+the+South+19-Jun-2008.htm ]

So what does it show?

It shows that during the truce between June to December the amount of rockets and mortars was virtually nil, until after Israel invaded Gaza on the day of the US Presidential election, when all eyes were on the USA (which of course the graph does not show).

July : total = 12
August : total = 11
September : total = 4 (!)
October : total = 2(!!)
November : total = 193 ( the month Israel invaded Gaza)

So what does this mean?

It means you are being lied to.

It means that Hamas exercised some restraint with the hope that Israel would abide by its side of the truce, which was to ease the blockade that was enforced after Hamas was democratically elected!

But Israel did not ease the blockade.

Yes, Israel can come out with these statistics that so many rockets have been fired over the years.

But look at the facts.

During the truce the number of rockets and mortars fired was very much less than before the truce, until Israel invaded Gaza. And those rockets that were fired may well have come from other rogue organizations in Gaza anyway.

This is evidence that no matter what, Israel was going in.

This is evidence that Gaza is part of a much larger Operation Justified Vengeance.

Cast Lead was planned six months ago.
Barak's wet dream has always been to invade Gaza.
The truce is going too well, so invade Gaza when nobody's looking on the day of the US Presidential election, to provoke rockets and mortars.

And before the MFA remove the graph I found it on SparrowWatch.

Is this worth dead starving Gazan children? Grieving Gazan parents? Grieving Israeli parents, even?

ABSOLUTELY NOT!

No comments:

Post a Comment