Highly recommend it. Perhaps it is a touch too melodramatic at times, and more time could have been spent on more historical details, such as an extension to Canaris, but it shows the fact that there were factions within Nazi Germany and that some people were taking very brave decisions and actions to save their country and people.
Stauffenberg was a member of the faction who saw what one of Hitler's ultimate purposes was; the total destruction of Germany. This faction attempted several times to negotiate terms of surrender with the Allies which would restore the German Monarchy and then Germany would turn its full force onto the Soviet Union and stop its invasion of Eastern Europe and expansion into China.
But no such agreement was made. Both Churchill and FDR rejected all suggestions, wanting instead "the utter destruction of Germany".
Why?
Because it wasn't part of the plan.
The plan was to empower Communism and to eventually create and populate Israel with Jews who during the previous centuries had resisted attempts to entice them into Palestine. If any such agreement had been reached there would have been no post-war Communist USSR and China creating nuclear tension, and no Israel now being used to start WW3.
Regarding Israel, as stated above there had been a number of attempts to entice Jews to Palestine, all rejected en masse by Jews. A number of these attempts had been instigated by the Rothschilds in the 19th Century. So after WW1, Hitler was created by the great family friends of the Rothschilds, the Warburgs. Warburgs sat on the boards of The Federal Reserve of the USA, IG Farben, the Reichsbank and had their own bank MM Warburg which advised the German government. A Warburg had also sent Lenin into Russia along with Rothschild relative Bethmann-Hollweg, who encouraged Austria to pursue a military solution to the assassination of Arch Duke Franz Ferdinand which ultimately led to WW1 as arranged by Freemasonry.
For further details see my website The Conspiracy Explained.
To write the TRUTH, the men of july 20, 1944 were not planning to restore a monarchy. Claus von Stauffenberg would have preferred to install a monarchy. But in the end they left this question open. They knew they could only form an interim government and therefore could afford not to decide on this question. They wanted to name Goerdeler, a socialist as the new chancelor ( head of the german government). Goerdeler was decidedly in favour to install a republic.
ReplyDeleteThanks for correcting that tiny detail. If you have any more corrections to add please do.
ReplyDeleteBut the main points stand;
1. German resistance to Hitler tried to negotiate several times with the Allies to hand Hitler over or kill him in return for German independence, either monarchy or republic as long as Hitler was removed from power, and then Germany would fight Communism.
2. Israel is a Rothschild/Warburg project spanning centuries designed to start WW3.
3. By agreeing to the German resistance request for independence many Jews would have been saved and Israel would probably not exist, and Communism would not have expanded into Eastern Europe, and the USSR containing Eastern Europe may not have had the power to expand into China, but that was due to the manipulation of Marshall rather any military invasion by the USSR.
Sorry to comment a tiny detail again. Stauffenberg would have preferred to hold the Eastern front against the Sowiet Union and start peace talks with the western allies. He also would have preferred to fight together with the western allies against the Sowiet Union. The german army however in 1944 was by far to weak to go against the Russians alone. Also politically this wasn´t feasable after the treaties of Yalta and after the successfull D-day invasion into France. In July 1944 they would have gone for more or less unconditional surrender in order to stop the war, holocaust etc.. This would have saved millions of lives on all sides.
ReplyDelete