BBC BIAS ON CLIMATE CHANGE...AGAIN!

On BBC Radio 5 Live this morning there was classic media bias, akin to the bias shown by Alan Partridge in Partridge Over Britain.

Rachel Burden was hosting a debate on the social stigma attached to being a climate sceptic. I missed the first few minutes of the debate but two contributors, classed as sceptics, were rudely interrupted when they were making very very good points.

James Delingpole was one of those contributors. He was arguing with a guy from the LSE The Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment. That guy went on and on about peer reviewed papers all 'proving' AGW. James then came back very happily, arguing that the facts shown in the Climategate data show that the peer review process with respect to AGW cannot be trusted, because there has obviously been a process to block the publication of any data and theories that are contrary to AGW. Burden then rudely interrupted James for no apparent reason.

Another contributor began to talk about biofuels for the developed world taking up agricultural land in the underdeveloped world, which has led to food shortages, and the subsequent massive price hikes and starvation and deaths. Again, Burden rudely interrupted him for no apparent reason to shut him up.

Then the weather forecaster came on and he went into a blind rant about warming, demanding that something be signed at Copenhagen.

Burden did not interrupt him.

But to top it all off, Burden expressed her bias by reading her favourite text which described the human race as boiling frogs not noticing the earth allegedly warming up, and then at the end agreeing with a caller who had watched the David Attenborough programme in which he claimed there were too many people on the planet.

Well I hope Dave will be offering himself up for sacrifice to save on his carbon footprint. How many miles has that eco-fascist travelled in the decades, the hypocrite! He's been made into one of the nation's favourite genocidalists.