She was sweetness and light several years ago as Hannah Montana. And because she was financed by Disney we all beloved it was all good clean fun, so we bought her CDs and DVDs etc and allowed our younger female relatives to identify with her.
But in the last few weeks Cyrus has been tranceformed.
Video of her grinding her butt against a man old enough to be her grandad was released.
Next it was raunchy footage from a concert.
Now yet more raunchy footage from a different concert.
And all just as adverts for abortion are being shown on TV in the UK.
Now I'm not suggesting that Cyrus is under complete mind control, but there is some sort of operation going on with her.
Hi! The world is currently in deep doodoo. Want to know why? Do you want an injection of truth? Then take The Truth Serum. See the true world develop before your very eyes. See the slow imposition of a Police State with microchip implants and 24/7 surveillance. See the disappearance of cash to be replaced with a cashless society. And much, much more...
Pages
▼
Monday, May 31, 2010
HOW COULD WE POSSIBLY LOVE ISRAEL MORE
Israel, with its complete selfishness and belligerence, never ceases to amaze me.
But remember the banks.
First BP destroys the Gulf of Mexico and news is dominated by their failed attempts to stop the oil flow.
Now Israel has sent some lovely caring IDF commandoes to halt a peace ship laden with aid for starving destitute Palestinians following Israel's barbaric and engineered attack on Gaza at the end of 2008, which has led to the deaths of approximately 10 aid campaigners, causing much international outrage.
Israelis must look deep into themselves, and ask, "what the fuck are we doing?"
But remember the banks.
First BP destroys the Gulf of Mexico and news is dominated by their failed attempts to stop the oil flow.
Now Israel has sent some lovely caring IDF commandoes to halt a peace ship laden with aid for starving destitute Palestinians following Israel's barbaric and engineered attack on Gaza at the end of 2008, which has led to the deaths of approximately 10 aid campaigners, causing much international outrage.
Israelis must look deep into themselves, and ask, "what the fuck are we doing?"
Sunday, May 30, 2010
WE ALL LIVE IN AN ISRAELI SUBMARINE
(or should that be sumbarine?)
If all our lives depend on the orders sent to particular Israeli submarines close to Iran in the Iranian Gulf, and the preparedness of the submariners to carry out those orders, then we all live in those submarines.
We breathe the same air as the submariners.
We drink the same water as them.
We haunt them.
ALl our lives depend on them.
For if they strike Iran then...
If all our lives depend on the orders sent to particular Israeli submarines close to Iran in the Iranian Gulf, and the preparedness of the submariners to carry out those orders, then we all live in those submarines.
We breathe the same air as the submariners.
We drink the same water as them.
We haunt them.
ALl our lives depend on them.
For if they strike Iran then...
IT'S ALL POLITICAL
For years the UK has complained that the Eurovision Song Contest is rigged, that it's all political, that certain nations form a bloc etc.
Germany won last night.
Germany.
Not Armenia.
Not Azerbaijan.
Not Moldova.
Germany.
Why?
Because Germany is taking on the banksters by banning the derivatives that have caused the current financial chaos so that world government can be implemented via the IMF etc.
Interestingly, Turkey came second. Turkey has recently postponed an attack on Iran by the Zionazis with its agreement with Brazil regarding Iran's nuclear power.
Could the results be arranged so? C'est possible.
Germany won last night.
Germany.
Not Armenia.
Not Azerbaijan.
Not Moldova.
Germany.
Why?
Because Germany is taking on the banksters by banning the derivatives that have caused the current financial chaos so that world government can be implemented via the IMF etc.
Interestingly, Turkey came second. Turkey has recently postponed an attack on Iran by the Zionazis with its agreement with Brazil regarding Iran's nuclear power.
Could the results be arranged so? C'est possible.
Saturday, May 29, 2010
FEAR NOT! THE ENGLISH DEFENCE LEAGUE WILL SAVE THE BANKS!
I observed rather than attended the EDL protest in Leeds last October, and did not find them to be that threatening (but having grown up as a football casual in the 1980s I am used to such situations). Police from I believe seven constabularies, with dogs and riot gear, herded them into a caged area in City Square, and there was far more violence from a counter demo run by the UAF. The EDL sang the national anthem (which I found amusing) and "No surrender to the al-Qaeda". I was not ecstatic with the EDL but mildly sympathetic to their cause because the Islamic Fundamentalist terrorists have been allowed to grow and operate from here in the UK due to the Covenant of Security with MI5. I do not want terrorists of any persuasion on British soil, and I think you don't either (unless you are MI5 wanting to allow terrorism to bring in the police state asap). But at the same time the majority of the Asian community do not support terrorism either, but quite a few do.
But now it appears the EDL are going to try to spark race riots by targeting the Asian communities of selected cities, such as Bradford.
This is a significant escalation of the original cause of the EDL, from peaceful protest to provoking race riots, and I wonder where it has come from; why now? Has the EDL been hijacked? Or was it always a front to be activated when required?
There is only one benefactor from such unnecessary and probably counter-productive action; the New World Order!
They want nothing more than to have us fighting each other while they rob us blind, and the global economy collapses by design so that a world government apparatus can be installed and empowered further. That elusive war with Iran would be preferable, but race riots will do if that can't be satisfied.
The following report suggests that there may be some agents provocateur being infiltrated into the EDL from the military and way beyond far right parties.
And if the EDL has been infiltrated then you can bet the UAF has too.
It could be a long hot violent summer...
Instead of provoking race riots the EDL should be marching on Whitehall and Vauxhall demanding that MI5 and MI6
1. cease their kiddie-fiddling, terrorist and drug-smuggling activities immediately,
2. arrest all known and suspected kiddie-fiddlers and terrorists in the UK and prosecute them and/or deport them to their country of origin,
and also demand the arrest and prosecution for treason of all MI5 and MI6 agents who ran the above operations to use and protect such criminals.
Now that would be defending England.
================================================
From http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2010/may/28/english-defence-league-guardian-investigation
English Defence League: Inside the violent world of Britain's new far right
Undercover Guardian investigation reveals plan by English Defence League to hit racially sensitive areas in attempt to provoke disorder over summer
MPs expressed concern tonight after it emerged that far-right activists are planning to step up their provocative street campaign by targeting some of the UK's highest-profile Muslim communities, raising fears of widespread unrest this summer.
Undercover footage shot by the Guardian reveals the English Defence League, which has staged a number of violent protests in towns and cities across the country this year, is planning to "hit" Bradford and the London borough of Tower Hamlets as it intensifies its street protests.
Senior figures in the coalition government were briefed on the threat posed by EDL marches this week. Tomorrow up to 2,000 EDL supporters are expected to descend on Newcastle for its latest protest.
MPs said the group's decision to target some of the UK's most prominent Muslim communities was a blatant attempt to provoke mayhem and disorder. "This group has no positive agenda," said the Bradford South MP, Gerry Sutcliffe. "It is an agenda of hate that is designed to divide people and communities. We support legitimate protest but this is not legitimate, it is designed to stir up trouble. The people of Bradford will want no part of it."
The English Defence League, which started in Luton last year, has become the most significant far-right street movement in the UK since the National Front in the 1970s. A Guardian investigation has identified a number of known rightwing extremists who are taking an interest in the movement – from convicted football hooligans to members of violent rightwing splinter groups.
Thousands of people have attended its protests – many of which have descended into violence and racist and Islamophobic chanting. Supporters are split into "divisions" spread across the UK and as many as 3,000 people are attracted to its protests.
The group also appears to be drawing support from the armed forces. Its online armed forces division has 842 members and the EDL says many serving soldiers have attended its demonstrations. A spokeswoman for the EDL, whose husband is a serving soldier, said: "The soldiers are fighting Islamic extremism in Afghanistan and Iraq and the EDL are fighting it here … Not all the armed forces support the English Defence League but a majority do."
Following the British National party's poor showing in this month's local and national elections anti-racist campaigners say some far-right activists may be turning away from the ballot box and returning to violent street demonstrations for the first time in three decades.
Nick Lowles, from Searchlight, said: "What we are seeing now is the most serious, most dangerous, political phenomenon that we have had in Britain for a number of years. With EDL protests that are growing week in, week out there is a chance for major disorder and a major political shift to the right in this country."
In undercover footage shot by Guardian Films, EDL spokesman Guramit Singh says its Bradford demonstration "will be huge". He adds: "The problem with Bradford is the security threat, it is a highly populated Muslim area. They are very militant as well. Bradford is a place that has got to be hit."
Singh, who was speaking during an EDL demonstration in Dudley in April, said the organisation would also be targeting Tower Hamlets.
A spokesman for the EDL confirmed it would hold a demonstration in Bradford on 28 August because the city was "on course to be one of the first places to become a no-go area for non-Muslims". The EDL has already announced demonstrations in Cardiff and Dudley.
The former Home Office minister Phil Woolas said: "This is a deliberate attempt by the EDL at division and provocation, to try and push young Muslims into the hands of extremists, in order to perpetuate the divide. It is dangerous."
The EDL claims it is a peaceful and non-racist organisation only concerned with protesting against "militant Islam". However, over the last four months the Guardian has attended its demonstrations and witnessed racism, violence and virulent Islamophobia.
During the election campaign David Cameron described the EDL as "dreadful people" and said the organisation would "always be under review".
A spokesman for the Home Office said that although the government was committed to restoring the right to "non-violent protest … violence and intimidation are wholly unacceptable and the police have powers to deal with individuals who commit such acts. The government condemns those who seek to spread hatred."
He added: "Individual members of EDL – like all members of the public – are of course subject to the law, and all suspected criminal offences will be robustly investigated and dealt with by the police."
But now it appears the EDL are going to try to spark race riots by targeting the Asian communities of selected cities, such as Bradford.
This is a significant escalation of the original cause of the EDL, from peaceful protest to provoking race riots, and I wonder where it has come from; why now? Has the EDL been hijacked? Or was it always a front to be activated when required?
There is only one benefactor from such unnecessary and probably counter-productive action; the New World Order!
They want nothing more than to have us fighting each other while they rob us blind, and the global economy collapses by design so that a world government apparatus can be installed and empowered further. That elusive war with Iran would be preferable, but race riots will do if that can't be satisfied.
The following report suggests that there may be some agents provocateur being infiltrated into the EDL from the military and way beyond far right parties.
And if the EDL has been infiltrated then you can bet the UAF has too.
It could be a long hot violent summer...
Instead of provoking race riots the EDL should be marching on Whitehall and Vauxhall demanding that MI5 and MI6
1. cease their kiddie-fiddling, terrorist and drug-smuggling activities immediately,
2. arrest all known and suspected kiddie-fiddlers and terrorists in the UK and prosecute them and/or deport them to their country of origin,
and also demand the arrest and prosecution for treason of all MI5 and MI6 agents who ran the above operations to use and protect such criminals.
Now that would be defending England.
================================================
From http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2010/may/28/english-defence-league-guardian-investigation
English Defence League: Inside the violent world of Britain's new far right
Undercover Guardian investigation reveals plan by English Defence League to hit racially sensitive areas in attempt to provoke disorder over summer
MPs expressed concern tonight after it emerged that far-right activists are planning to step up their provocative street campaign by targeting some of the UK's highest-profile Muslim communities, raising fears of widespread unrest this summer.
Undercover footage shot by the Guardian reveals the English Defence League, which has staged a number of violent protests in towns and cities across the country this year, is planning to "hit" Bradford and the London borough of Tower Hamlets as it intensifies its street protests.
Senior figures in the coalition government were briefed on the threat posed by EDL marches this week. Tomorrow up to 2,000 EDL supporters are expected to descend on Newcastle for its latest protest.
MPs said the group's decision to target some of the UK's most prominent Muslim communities was a blatant attempt to provoke mayhem and disorder. "This group has no positive agenda," said the Bradford South MP, Gerry Sutcliffe. "It is an agenda of hate that is designed to divide people and communities. We support legitimate protest but this is not legitimate, it is designed to stir up trouble. The people of Bradford will want no part of it."
The English Defence League, which started in Luton last year, has become the most significant far-right street movement in the UK since the National Front in the 1970s. A Guardian investigation has identified a number of known rightwing extremists who are taking an interest in the movement – from convicted football hooligans to members of violent rightwing splinter groups.
Thousands of people have attended its protests – many of which have descended into violence and racist and Islamophobic chanting. Supporters are split into "divisions" spread across the UK and as many as 3,000 people are attracted to its protests.
The group also appears to be drawing support from the armed forces. Its online armed forces division has 842 members and the EDL says many serving soldiers have attended its demonstrations. A spokeswoman for the EDL, whose husband is a serving soldier, said: "The soldiers are fighting Islamic extremism in Afghanistan and Iraq and the EDL are fighting it here … Not all the armed forces support the English Defence League but a majority do."
Following the British National party's poor showing in this month's local and national elections anti-racist campaigners say some far-right activists may be turning away from the ballot box and returning to violent street demonstrations for the first time in three decades.
Nick Lowles, from Searchlight, said: "What we are seeing now is the most serious, most dangerous, political phenomenon that we have had in Britain for a number of years. With EDL protests that are growing week in, week out there is a chance for major disorder and a major political shift to the right in this country."
In undercover footage shot by Guardian Films, EDL spokesman Guramit Singh says its Bradford demonstration "will be huge". He adds: "The problem with Bradford is the security threat, it is a highly populated Muslim area. They are very militant as well. Bradford is a place that has got to be hit."
Singh, who was speaking during an EDL demonstration in Dudley in April, said the organisation would also be targeting Tower Hamlets.
A spokesman for the EDL confirmed it would hold a demonstration in Bradford on 28 August because the city was "on course to be one of the first places to become a no-go area for non-Muslims". The EDL has already announced demonstrations in Cardiff and Dudley.
The former Home Office minister Phil Woolas said: "This is a deliberate attempt by the EDL at division and provocation, to try and push young Muslims into the hands of extremists, in order to perpetuate the divide. It is dangerous."
The EDL claims it is a peaceful and non-racist organisation only concerned with protesting against "militant Islam". However, over the last four months the Guardian has attended its demonstrations and witnessed racism, violence and virulent Islamophobia.
During the election campaign David Cameron described the EDL as "dreadful people" and said the organisation would "always be under review".
A spokesman for the Home Office said that although the government was committed to restoring the right to "non-violent protest … violence and intimidation are wholly unacceptable and the police have powers to deal with individuals who commit such acts. The government condemns those who seek to spread hatred."
He added: "Individual members of EDL – like all members of the public – are of course subject to the law, and all suspected criminal offences will be robustly investigated and dealt with by the police."
Friday, May 28, 2010
EVERY NIGHT I THANK GOD MY NAME IS NOT ROTHSCHILD
I don't want to be lynched by an angry mob after they've found out how my ancestors have been tricked into fighting and dying into WW1 and WW2 and then tricked into supporting the EU and supporting man-made mass genocide due to alleged man-made global warming, so that a tyrannical world government can be created.
Thank god I'm not a Rothschild...
They are doomed.
Thank god I'm not a Rothschild...
They are doomed.
ISRAEL'S NUKES
Fuck me!
The USA(!!!!) has agreed to pressure Israel on its nukes to make the Middle East free of nukes by...
[source : U.S. yields to Arab demand to pressure Israel on nukes, Haaretz 28/5/2010, http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/u-s-yields-to-arab-demand-to-pressure-israel-on-nukes-1.292804]
Well, no date has been given but the idea is REVOLUTIONARY!
But we must always ask that most fundamental question ; WHY?
After years, ney decades, of vetoes and support, why would the USA finally decide to bring Israel down to size?
My cynical answer would be because the PTB have decided to really scare the shit out of nuclear-armed Israel.
Israel has so far done its job by angering many Muslims into terrorism, i.e. 9/11, but that so-far elusive nuclear-fuelled WW3 has not happened.
AND IT IS SCARING THE SHIT OUT OF THE NWO!
BECAUSE YOU AND YOUR FAMILY AND YOUR FRIENDS ARE WAKING UP TO THE PLAN MUCH FASTER THAN THEY CAN AMEND THEIR PLANS.
Their plan was simple and plain; force and/or trick Jews into Palestine and then support them in their barbaric treatment of Palestinians.
So far so good...hence 9/11 (which utilised anger caused by anger by Israel's barbarism).
But, and it is a very very big but.
But, Israel was also given nukes...and neighbouring nations have always known this.
But Israel, having been led to believe that it had unbounded support from USA and UK, and so treated its neighbours like shit for decades, has suddenly been told that it is on its own!!
Now, how would you, as a nuclear-armed Israeli terrified of decades of bullying and invasion and war against your neighbours, react?
They're going for it.
Israel has been fucked like the rest of us. It's the Zionazis at the the top who know the game. Zionazis like the Rothschilds, who must be brought down to size.
The USA(!!!!) has agreed to pressure Israel on its nukes to make the Middle East free of nukes by...
[source : U.S. yields to Arab demand to pressure Israel on nukes, Haaretz 28/5/2010, http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/u-s-yields-to-arab-demand-to-pressure-israel-on-nukes-1.292804]
Well, no date has been given but the idea is REVOLUTIONARY!
But we must always ask that most fundamental question ; WHY?
After years, ney decades, of vetoes and support, why would the USA finally decide to bring Israel down to size?
My cynical answer would be because the PTB have decided to really scare the shit out of nuclear-armed Israel.
Israel has so far done its job by angering many Muslims into terrorism, i.e. 9/11, but that so-far elusive nuclear-fuelled WW3 has not happened.
AND IT IS SCARING THE SHIT OUT OF THE NWO!
BECAUSE YOU AND YOUR FAMILY AND YOUR FRIENDS ARE WAKING UP TO THE PLAN MUCH FASTER THAN THEY CAN AMEND THEIR PLANS.
Their plan was simple and plain; force and/or trick Jews into Palestine and then support them in their barbaric treatment of Palestinians.
So far so good...hence 9/11 (which utilised anger caused by anger by Israel's barbarism).
But, and it is a very very big but.
But, Israel was also given nukes...and neighbouring nations have always known this.
But Israel, having been led to believe that it had unbounded support from USA and UK, and so treated its neighbours like shit for decades, has suddenly been told that it is on its own!!
Now, how would you, as a nuclear-armed Israeli terrified of decades of bullying and invasion and war against your neighbours, react?
They're going for it.
Israel has been fucked like the rest of us. It's the Zionazis at the the top who know the game. Zionazis like the Rothschilds, who must be brought down to size.
DOWNGRADED SPAIN
Spain has now also been downgraded by Fitch.
It was recently downgraded by S&P.
Both S&P and Fitch were intimately involved in the complete fuck-up of the global economy in the last decade by rating junk mortgages as AAA.
Bilderberg met in Greece last year.
Bilderberg will meet in Spain next week.
Coincidence?
I seriously doubt it.
=======================================
From http://voices.washingtonpost.com/economy-watch/2010/05/stocks_down_slightly_on_quiet.html?hpid=topnews
Fitch downgrades Spain, Wall Street stocks fall in response
UPDATED at 1:24 p.m.:
The quiet day on Wall Street is over.
Stocks are down following ratings-agency Fitch's downgrade of Spain's credit rating, following a similar downgrade last month from rival ratings agency S&P.
The Dow, the broader S&P 500 and the tech-heavy Nasdaq are all down at or near 1 percent.
Spain is a bigger problem for Europe than is Greece, because Spain is so much larger: Too big to fail and too big to save at the same time. Nevertheless, the European debt contagion has spread to the Iberian peninsula, with Portugal consumed, as well.
Fitch said Spain's rating is "stable," but it cut the nation's rating from "AAA" to "AA+."
"The downgrade reflects Fitch's assessment that the process of adjustment to a lower level of private sector and external indebtedness will materially reduce the rate of growth of the Spanish economy over the medium-term," said Brian Coulton, the head of EMEA sovereign ratings, in a statement. "Despite government debt and associated interest costs remaining within the AAA range, Fitch anticipates that the economic adjustment process will be more difficult and prolonged than for other economies with AAA rated sovereign governments, which is why the agency has downgraded Spain's rating to AA+."
It was recently downgraded by S&P.
Both S&P and Fitch were intimately involved in the complete fuck-up of the global economy in the last decade by rating junk mortgages as AAA.
Bilderberg met in Greece last year.
Bilderberg will meet in Spain next week.
Coincidence?
I seriously doubt it.
=======================================
From http://voices.washingtonpost.com/economy-watch/2010/05/stocks_down_slightly_on_quiet.html?hpid=topnews
Fitch downgrades Spain, Wall Street stocks fall in response
UPDATED at 1:24 p.m.:
The quiet day on Wall Street is over.
Stocks are down following ratings-agency Fitch's downgrade of Spain's credit rating, following a similar downgrade last month from rival ratings agency S&P.
The Dow, the broader S&P 500 and the tech-heavy Nasdaq are all down at or near 1 percent.
Spain is a bigger problem for Europe than is Greece, because Spain is so much larger: Too big to fail and too big to save at the same time. Nevertheless, the European debt contagion has spread to the Iberian peninsula, with Portugal consumed, as well.
Fitch said Spain's rating is "stable," but it cut the nation's rating from "AAA" to "AA+."
"The downgrade reflects Fitch's assessment that the process of adjustment to a lower level of private sector and external indebtedness will materially reduce the rate of growth of the Spanish economy over the medium-term," said Brian Coulton, the head of EMEA sovereign ratings, in a statement. "Despite government debt and associated interest costs remaining within the AAA range, Fitch anticipates that the economic adjustment process will be more difficult and prolonged than for other economies with AAA rated sovereign governments, which is why the agency has downgraded Spain's rating to AA+."
IT'S THAT OLD DEVIL CALLED THE AXIS OF EVIL AGAIN
Let's get a few things straight about The Axis of Evil (there is more than one, e.g The City of London and Wall Street Axis of Evil, and the one I am talking about will become clear).
Iran was encouraged to research nuclear power and given the technology to do so by the US Government decades ago as part of the Atoms For Peace Program.
North Korea was given similar but more modern technology more recently by ABB under Donald Rumsfeld, who was US Secretary of Defense on 9/11 and suggested (confessed?) in a rushed inpromptu press interview that a missile hit the Pentagon on that day.
Iraq, under CIA agent Saddam Hussein, was accused of having nuclear weapons and other nasty weapons (that we sold to him through...RUMSFELD), and Rumsfeld and Cheney and all the rest then came on TV and told us they knew where these WMD were. Guess what? No WMD, never mind nukes, have been found, but 'suggestions' were made that Syria had agreed to hide them.
Now North Korea (member of Number 2 Axis of Evil) is now accused of supplying Iran (member of Number 2 Axis of Evil) and Syria (member of those nations targeted by Israel in A Clean Break and alleged collaborator of Iraq, member of Number 2 Axis of Evil, in hiding Iraq's alleged WMD).
Can you see a pattern emerging here?
1. We gave these nations nuclear technology for power many years ago.
2. We then set up a terrible false-flag terror attack for 9/11, and on 9/11 Rumsfeld's defense department was mysteriously asleep as alleged hijacked planes were flying all over the North East airspace of the USA, which you would think would be the most protected airspace in the world.
3. Then after 9/11 the Number 2 Axis of Evil is named (Number one Axis of Evil being, of course, The City of London and Wall Street, you know, those persons known and unknown who have deliberately caused so much misery with their derivatives), and instead of focusing on the alleged perp of 9/11, Osama bin Laden, we decide instead to focus on those member nations of Axis of Evil Number 2 (Iraq, Iran and North Korea) who had been set up years ago for being accused of WMD and nuclear weapons development with the supply of nuclear power technology, and nasty weapons sold to them by...Rumsfeld.
This is how far they can plan ahead..decades in advance.
But I believe I show on my website that they have planned CENTURIES in advance, and can do so through war and terror, to keep you scared and controlled, and then spiking your water with chemicals such as flouride, and diverting your attention onto trivia such as 11 men kicking a pig's bladder about so you don't want to look up from your 54 inch plasma screen while watching an unimportant game of football while guzzling your 7th bottle of Stella Artois.
The report accusing North Korea of supplying Iran and Syria has been leaked from the UN.
The UN was created by Rockefeller, as was the League of Nations before it.
Rockefeller controls Wall Street, and his bank JP Morgan Chase (who Blair works for, and Blair's son works for a different branch of the same empire) created the derivatives monster and is master of that arena of rigged gambling that has been so disastrous for the human race.
=========================================
From http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/may/28/north-korea-exporting-nuclear-technology
North Korea 'is exporting nuclear technology'
Leaked UN report says Pyongyang is using front companies to export nuclear and missile technology to Iran, Syria and Burma
* Digg it
* Buzz up
* Share on facebook (2)
* Tweet this (25)
* Justin McCurry and agencies in Seoul
* guardian.co.uk, Friday 28 May 2010 11.09 BST
* Article history
South Korean president Lee and Wen Jiabao
South Korean president Lee Myung-bak (left) and Chinese premier Wen Jiabao. The revelations came just hours before Wen arrived in South Korea for a three-day visit. Photograph: Jo Yong-Hak/Reuters
International efforts to avert a full-blown crisis on the Korean peninsula were given greater urgency today after a leaked UN report claimed that North Korea is defying UN sanctions and using front companies to export nuclear and missile technology to Iran, Syria and Burma.
The report, by a panel that monitors sanctions imposed after Pyongyang conducted nuclear weapons tests in 2006 and 2009, said the regime was using shell companies and overseas criminal networks to export the technology.
The 47-page report contains a long list of sanctions violations reported by UN member states, including four cases of arms exports.
The revelations came just hours before the Chinese premier, Wen Jiabao, arrived in South Korea for a three-day visit certain to be dominated by mounting tensions between Seoul and Pyongyang.
China, the North's closest ally and main benefactor, has so far refused to add its voice to condemnation of the regime after a multinational investigation concluded a North Korean torpedo sank a South Korean naval vessel in March, killing 46 sailors.
At a meeting today, Wen told South Korean president Lee Myung-bak that he condemned any act which threatened peace and stability on the Korean peninsula.
"China objects to and condemns any act that destroys the peace and stability of the Korean peninsula," Wen said, according to a South Korean official citing the Chinese leader's comments.
Analysts say Beijing is unlikely to support possible UN security council moves against North Korea, but might be persuaded to abstain from a vote on a resolution rather then use it veto powers.
The sanctions report, leaked to journalists in New York, said UN bans on nuclear and ballistic missile technology, and on all arms exports and most imports, were having an effect.
But it conceded that the North had found ways to circumvent sanctions using companies and individuals who are not subject to asset freezes and travel bans.
Pyongyang, the panel said, had used "a number of masking techniques," including falsely labelling the contents of shipping containers and giving inaccurate information about their origin and destination.
North Korea was using "multiple layers of intermediaries, shell companies and financial institutions" to get around sanctions, it added.
An unnamed western diplomat based at the UN said: "The details in the report are not entirely surprising. Basically it suggests that North Korea has exported nuclear and missile technology with the aid of front companies, middlemen and other ruses."
The report said the regime had attempted to conceal arms exports by sending items in kit form to be constructed at their destination, and called on recipient countries of North Korean cargo to act with "extra vigilance".
Pyongyang is also suspected of using overseas crime groups to transport and distribute "illicit and smuggled cargoes", possibly including parts for weapons of mass destruction.
Wen and Lee will continue talks tomorrow, at a three-way summit that will also include Japanese prime minister Yukio Hatoyama. A spokesman for Lee that South Korea was "fully concentrating on diplomatic efforts to hold North Korea responsible".
But experts said China's options were limited, given its desire to defuse tensions and avoid sparking a political and humanitarian crisis in its own backyard.
"China has its own strategic stake in the Korean peninsula, and if North Korea is further isolated or sanctioned, that would escalate tensions and risk serious instability," said Prof Wei Zhijiang of Zhongshan University in southern China.
In response to the sinking, South Korea froze trade with the North, resumed propaganda broadcasts across the border and announced joint naval exercises with the US.
The North retaliated by severing ties with its neighbour, expelling South Korean officials from a joint industrial venture and banning the country's aircraft from its airspace. It also ditched an agreement designed to prevent naval clashes and threatened to attack any South Korean vessel entering its waters.
Iran was encouraged to research nuclear power and given the technology to do so by the US Government decades ago as part of the Atoms For Peace Program.
North Korea was given similar but more modern technology more recently by ABB under Donald Rumsfeld, who was US Secretary of Defense on 9/11 and suggested (confessed?) in a rushed inpromptu press interview that a missile hit the Pentagon on that day.
Iraq, under CIA agent Saddam Hussein, was accused of having nuclear weapons and other nasty weapons (that we sold to him through...RUMSFELD), and Rumsfeld and Cheney and all the rest then came on TV and told us they knew where these WMD were. Guess what? No WMD, never mind nukes, have been found, but 'suggestions' were made that Syria had agreed to hide them.
Now North Korea (member of Number 2 Axis of Evil) is now accused of supplying Iran (member of Number 2 Axis of Evil) and Syria (member of those nations targeted by Israel in A Clean Break and alleged collaborator of Iraq, member of Number 2 Axis of Evil, in hiding Iraq's alleged WMD).
Can you see a pattern emerging here?
1. We gave these nations nuclear technology for power many years ago.
2. We then set up a terrible false-flag terror attack for 9/11, and on 9/11 Rumsfeld's defense department was mysteriously asleep as alleged hijacked planes were flying all over the North East airspace of the USA, which you would think would be the most protected airspace in the world.
3. Then after 9/11 the Number 2 Axis of Evil is named (Number one Axis of Evil being, of course, The City of London and Wall Street, you know, those persons known and unknown who have deliberately caused so much misery with their derivatives), and instead of focusing on the alleged perp of 9/11, Osama bin Laden, we decide instead to focus on those member nations of Axis of Evil Number 2 (Iraq, Iran and North Korea) who had been set up years ago for being accused of WMD and nuclear weapons development with the supply of nuclear power technology, and nasty weapons sold to them by...Rumsfeld.
This is how far they can plan ahead..decades in advance.
But I believe I show on my website that they have planned CENTURIES in advance, and can do so through war and terror, to keep you scared and controlled, and then spiking your water with chemicals such as flouride, and diverting your attention onto trivia such as 11 men kicking a pig's bladder about so you don't want to look up from your 54 inch plasma screen while watching an unimportant game of football while guzzling your 7th bottle of Stella Artois.
The report accusing North Korea of supplying Iran and Syria has been leaked from the UN.
The UN was created by Rockefeller, as was the League of Nations before it.
Rockefeller controls Wall Street, and his bank JP Morgan Chase (who Blair works for, and Blair's son works for a different branch of the same empire) created the derivatives monster and is master of that arena of rigged gambling that has been so disastrous for the human race.
=========================================
From http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/may/28/north-korea-exporting-nuclear-technology
North Korea 'is exporting nuclear technology'
Leaked UN report says Pyongyang is using front companies to export nuclear and missile technology to Iran, Syria and Burma
* Digg it
* Buzz up
* Share on facebook (2)
* Tweet this (25)
* Justin McCurry and agencies in Seoul
* guardian.co.uk, Friday 28 May 2010 11.09 BST
* Article history
South Korean president Lee and Wen Jiabao
South Korean president Lee Myung-bak (left) and Chinese premier Wen Jiabao. The revelations came just hours before Wen arrived in South Korea for a three-day visit. Photograph: Jo Yong-Hak/Reuters
International efforts to avert a full-blown crisis on the Korean peninsula were given greater urgency today after a leaked UN report claimed that North Korea is defying UN sanctions and using front companies to export nuclear and missile technology to Iran, Syria and Burma.
The report, by a panel that monitors sanctions imposed after Pyongyang conducted nuclear weapons tests in 2006 and 2009, said the regime was using shell companies and overseas criminal networks to export the technology.
The 47-page report contains a long list of sanctions violations reported by UN member states, including four cases of arms exports.
The revelations came just hours before the Chinese premier, Wen Jiabao, arrived in South Korea for a three-day visit certain to be dominated by mounting tensions between Seoul and Pyongyang.
China, the North's closest ally and main benefactor, has so far refused to add its voice to condemnation of the regime after a multinational investigation concluded a North Korean torpedo sank a South Korean naval vessel in March, killing 46 sailors.
At a meeting today, Wen told South Korean president Lee Myung-bak that he condemned any act which threatened peace and stability on the Korean peninsula.
"China objects to and condemns any act that destroys the peace and stability of the Korean peninsula," Wen said, according to a South Korean official citing the Chinese leader's comments.
Analysts say Beijing is unlikely to support possible UN security council moves against North Korea, but might be persuaded to abstain from a vote on a resolution rather then use it veto powers.
The sanctions report, leaked to journalists in New York, said UN bans on nuclear and ballistic missile technology, and on all arms exports and most imports, were having an effect.
But it conceded that the North had found ways to circumvent sanctions using companies and individuals who are not subject to asset freezes and travel bans.
Pyongyang, the panel said, had used "a number of masking techniques," including falsely labelling the contents of shipping containers and giving inaccurate information about their origin and destination.
North Korea was using "multiple layers of intermediaries, shell companies and financial institutions" to get around sanctions, it added.
An unnamed western diplomat based at the UN said: "The details in the report are not entirely surprising. Basically it suggests that North Korea has exported nuclear and missile technology with the aid of front companies, middlemen and other ruses."
The report said the regime had attempted to conceal arms exports by sending items in kit form to be constructed at their destination, and called on recipient countries of North Korean cargo to act with "extra vigilance".
Pyongyang is also suspected of using overseas crime groups to transport and distribute "illicit and smuggled cargoes", possibly including parts for weapons of mass destruction.
Wen and Lee will continue talks tomorrow, at a three-way summit that will also include Japanese prime minister Yukio Hatoyama. A spokesman for Lee that South Korea was "fully concentrating on diplomatic efforts to hold North Korea responsible".
But experts said China's options were limited, given its desire to defuse tensions and avoid sparking a political and humanitarian crisis in its own backyard.
"China has its own strategic stake in the Korean peninsula, and if North Korea is further isolated or sanctioned, that would escalate tensions and risk serious instability," said Prof Wei Zhijiang of Zhongshan University in southern China.
In response to the sinking, South Korea froze trade with the North, resumed propaganda broadcasts across the border and announced joint naval exercises with the US.
The North retaliated by severing ties with its neighbour, expelling South Korean officials from a joint industrial venture and banning the country's aircraft from its airspace. It also ditched an agreement designed to prevent naval clashes and threatened to attack any South Korean vessel entering its waters.
Thursday, May 27, 2010
Wednesday, May 26, 2010
NOW THE OECD DEMANDS SEVERE AUSTERITY
If it's not the IMF demanding severe austerity then it's the OECD!
[source : OECD urges tax rises and spending cuts, FT 25/5/2010]
The OECD was established as part of the Marshall Plan. The Marshall Plan was named after George Marshall. He was appointed by FDR as US Army Chief of Staff from the rank of General with no combat experience, above many more experienced US Army Major-Generals and Brigadiers with who had much more combat experience. Marshall repaid his benefactor FDR by not alerting Pearl Harbor to the Japanese Navy rapidly approaching them after FDR had provoked Japan into attacking the USA as suggested by Winston Churchill. After the horror of the provoked Pearl Harbor attack Churchill, FDR and Marshall got the USA into WW2.
By proving himself thus to the warmongers, after WW2 Marshall was given the job of managing the reconstruction of Europe after the warmongers had spent decades engineering BOTH the Nazis and Communists in preparation for another world war, one that the USA would fight in for much longer than it had in WW1. You see, even though Wilson had dragged the USA into WW1, 3000 miles away in Europe, after the contrived sinking of The Lusitania AND then proposing The League of Nations AND then touring the USA to promote the LoN, the USA did not vote to join the LoN. So the CFR was created, to drag the USA into a world government, and Marshall joined.
As part of the Marshall Plan the Organisation for European Economic Co-operation (OEEC) was created, which began to work towards creating the European Free Trade Area, which has since become the EU that we all know and love with all our heart and soul, don't we? The OECC eventually became the OECD.
And now here it is demanding severe austerity. NB it is not demanding prosecution of any bank or banker for completely fucking the world up, but is instead demanding severe austerity in the form of slashing public spending and raising taxes.
Oh thank you, OECD! Thank you! Fuck you! Thank you! Fuck you!...
Public spending cuts and tax rises in advanced economies are required by next year at the latest to deal with “very unfavourable government debt dynamics”, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development warned on Wednesday.
In its twice-yearly Economic Outlook, the Paris-based international organisation for advanced economies also saw the need for interest rates in the US, UK and Canada to start rising by the end of the year, as the world economic recovery continues.
Calling for urgent action in both fiscal and monetary policy in unusually strident language, the OECD worried that the market turmoil of recent weeks in response to the Greek sovereign debt crisis risked spreading if governments failed to get a grip on their budgets and central banks delayed normalisation of interest rates unnecessarily.
[source : OECD urges tax rises and spending cuts, FT 25/5/2010]
The OECD was established as part of the Marshall Plan. The Marshall Plan was named after George Marshall. He was appointed by FDR as US Army Chief of Staff from the rank of General with no combat experience, above many more experienced US Army Major-Generals and Brigadiers with who had much more combat experience. Marshall repaid his benefactor FDR by not alerting Pearl Harbor to the Japanese Navy rapidly approaching them after FDR had provoked Japan into attacking the USA as suggested by Winston Churchill. After the horror of the provoked Pearl Harbor attack Churchill, FDR and Marshall got the USA into WW2.
By proving himself thus to the warmongers, after WW2 Marshall was given the job of managing the reconstruction of Europe after the warmongers had spent decades engineering BOTH the Nazis and Communists in preparation for another world war, one that the USA would fight in for much longer than it had in WW1. You see, even though Wilson had dragged the USA into WW1, 3000 miles away in Europe, after the contrived sinking of The Lusitania AND then proposing The League of Nations AND then touring the USA to promote the LoN, the USA did not vote to join the LoN. So the CFR was created, to drag the USA into a world government, and Marshall joined.
As part of the Marshall Plan the Organisation for European Economic Co-operation (OEEC) was created, which began to work towards creating the European Free Trade Area, which has since become the EU that we all know and love with all our heart and soul, don't we? The OECC eventually became the OECD.
And now here it is demanding severe austerity. NB it is not demanding prosecution of any bank or banker for completely fucking the world up, but is instead demanding severe austerity in the form of slashing public spending and raising taxes.
Oh thank you, OECD! Thank you! Fuck you! Thank you! Fuck you!...
Tuesday, May 25, 2010
ABORTION IS DYING SO HOW DO THEY REVIVE IT? ADVERTISE IT ON TV!
For the second year in succession the total number of abortions in the UK has decreased. Abortion is what the NWO want. Child murder is the worst crime, and shows a total lack of love. Abortion is birth control. The symbol of Bohemian Grove, Moloch, demanded the burning of children before him. Moloch is also in the street plan of Washington DC with the Capitol inside his belly.
But just a few weeks ago it was announced that ads for abortion will be shown on UK TV!
================================================
From http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-1281269/Number-abortions-UK-falls-48-women-SEVEN.html
Dozens of women in UK have had at least SEVEN abortions - but overall rate is falling
By Daily Mail Reporter
Last updated at 2:03 PM on 25th May 2010
* Comments (3)
* Add to My Stories
Dozens of women in the UK have had at least seven abortions, shocking new figures reveal today.
Although the number of abortions in the country has fallen for the second year in a row, the figures will reignite the debate into whether some women use abortion as a form of contraception, rather than a last resort to unplanned pregnancy.
In total there were 189,100 abortions in 2009, which was down 3.2 per cent from 195,296 in 2008. The results covered women living in England and Wales.
However this was the fourth termination for 2,637 women, the fifth for 779 women and the sixth for 214.
A total of 48 women had had seven or more abortions.
Most of these were funded by the NHS, which paid for 94 per cent of all terminations.
There were 189,100 abortions in 2009 among women in England and Wales
There were 189,100 abortions in 2009 among women in England and Wales
Abortions were also performed on thousands of under-age girls. In total there were 3,823 abortions in under-16s. Of these 1,047 were the under 15s, 911 were 14 and 136 were under 14.
Girls aged 15 to 19 accounted for 39,020 abortions in 2009.
There were also 2,085 abortions (one in 100) for children who would have been born disabled.
This included 775 for chromosomal abnormalities including Down's syndrome and 496 for problems with the nervous system.
Most abortions (91 per cent) were carried out at under 13 weeks gestation.
Ann Furedi, chief executive of the British Pregnancy Advisory Service (BPAS), said: 'It's interesting to see that fewer abortions took place last year, for the second year running.
'However abortion figures tend to fluctuate slightly year-on-year so we can't call this a trend yet, especially with the background of the last few decades' gradual rise in the numbers of abortions.
'We're really pleased that a greater proportion of abortions took place at the earliest stages in 2009.
'There has been a two per cent rise in the number of under of 10 weeks' abortions, which now make up three quarters of all abortions.'
Julie Bentley, Chief Executive of The Family Planning Association, said: 'We can see that investing in contraceptive services and making women aware of their different contraceptive choices through national campaigns has a positive impact on unplanned pregnancy.
'This is an excellent reminder to budget holders of the importance of contraceptive services. It’s also good that abortion services seem to be tackling waiting times so women can get an abortion earlier on in pregnancy.'
A spokeswoman for the Department of Health said: 'We're pleased to see that the rate of abortions continues to fall.'
In 2009, 6,643 abortions were carried out on women who were not residents of England and Wales, down from 6,862 in 2008.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-1281269/Number-abortions-UK-falls-48-women-SEVEN.html#ixzz0owqZM715
But just a few weeks ago it was announced that ads for abortion will be shown on UK TV!
================================================
From http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-1281269/Number-abortions-UK-falls-48-women-SEVEN.html
Dozens of women in UK have had at least SEVEN abortions - but overall rate is falling
By Daily Mail Reporter
Last updated at 2:03 PM on 25th May 2010
* Comments (3)
* Add to My Stories
Dozens of women in the UK have had at least seven abortions, shocking new figures reveal today.
Although the number of abortions in the country has fallen for the second year in a row, the figures will reignite the debate into whether some women use abortion as a form of contraception, rather than a last resort to unplanned pregnancy.
In total there were 189,100 abortions in 2009, which was down 3.2 per cent from 195,296 in 2008. The results covered women living in England and Wales.
However this was the fourth termination for 2,637 women, the fifth for 779 women and the sixth for 214.
A total of 48 women had had seven or more abortions.
Most of these were funded by the NHS, which paid for 94 per cent of all terminations.
There were 189,100 abortions in 2009 among women in England and Wales
There were 189,100 abortions in 2009 among women in England and Wales
Abortions were also performed on thousands of under-age girls. In total there were 3,823 abortions in under-16s. Of these 1,047 were the under 15s, 911 were 14 and 136 were under 14.
Girls aged 15 to 19 accounted for 39,020 abortions in 2009.
There were also 2,085 abortions (one in 100) for children who would have been born disabled.
This included 775 for chromosomal abnormalities including Down's syndrome and 496 for problems with the nervous system.
Most abortions (91 per cent) were carried out at under 13 weeks gestation.
Ann Furedi, chief executive of the British Pregnancy Advisory Service (BPAS), said: 'It's interesting to see that fewer abortions took place last year, for the second year running.
'However abortion figures tend to fluctuate slightly year-on-year so we can't call this a trend yet, especially with the background of the last few decades' gradual rise in the numbers of abortions.
'We're really pleased that a greater proportion of abortions took place at the earliest stages in 2009.
'There has been a two per cent rise in the number of under of 10 weeks' abortions, which now make up three quarters of all abortions.'
Julie Bentley, Chief Executive of The Family Planning Association, said: 'We can see that investing in contraceptive services and making women aware of their different contraceptive choices through national campaigns has a positive impact on unplanned pregnancy.
'This is an excellent reminder to budget holders of the importance of contraceptive services. It’s also good that abortion services seem to be tackling waiting times so women can get an abortion earlier on in pregnancy.'
A spokeswoman for the Department of Health said: 'We're pleased to see that the rate of abortions continues to fall.'
In 2009, 6,643 abortions were carried out on women who were not residents of England and Wales, down from 6,862 in 2008.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-1281269/Number-abortions-UK-falls-48-women-SEVEN.html#ixzz0owqZM715
LAST YEAR GREECE. THIS YEAR SPAIN.
Bilderberg met in Greece last year, and then the country exploded.
Bilderberg will meet in Spain this year, and now Spain is next to explode.
BTW we, the British people, own nearly half of Lloyds and most of RBS.
======================================
From http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2010/may/25/shares-fall-korean-war-debt-fears
...The FTSE 100 index in London saw a heavy sell-off when trading began. It hit an eight-month low of 4898.49, a fall of 171 points or 3.3%, with every share losing value.
Miners and banking stocks were the worst hit, with Lloyds Banking Group losing 8.5% to 50.7p, and Royal Bank of Scotland down 7.7% to 41.8p
The slump in banking stocks follows fears that Spain will become the next victim of the European financial crisis. Last night the International Monetary Fund urged the Spanish government to reform its banking sector and its "dysfunctional" labour market.
Bilderberg will meet in Spain this year, and now Spain is next to explode.
BTW we, the British people, own nearly half of Lloyds and most of RBS.
======================================
From http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2010/may/25/shares-fall-korean-war-debt-fears
...The FTSE 100 index in London saw a heavy sell-off when trading began. It hit an eight-month low of 4898.49, a fall of 171 points or 3.3%, with every share losing value.
Miners and banking stocks were the worst hit, with Lloyds Banking Group losing 8.5% to 50.7p, and Royal Bank of Scotland down 7.7% to 41.8p
The slump in banking stocks follows fears that Spain will become the next victim of the European financial crisis. Last night the International Monetary Fund urged the Spanish government to reform its banking sector and its "dysfunctional" labour market.
THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT
Oik Osborne's statement today, designed to signal to our gods in The City and Wall Street that he is prepared to slash the state in order to repay any debts we may or may not owe to them, has been described as an hors d'oeuvre.
AND WHAT AN HORS D'OEURVE!
One academic economist estimated that from this one announcement alone approximately 100,000 jobs are at risk!
[source : More than 50,000 jobs 'at risk’ from £6.2bn cuts, The Daily Telegraph 24/5/2010]
And worse, much worse, is to come later this year.
The budget in June will make these numbers bigger and much more serious.
I do not want to hear these numbers, because they mean homes repossessed and families broken up, but if they help to rid us of the parasites, who have totally and deliberately screwed the global economy, as evidence that our financial status has been seriously harmed by the banks contrary to the Fraud Act 2006 Section 4 Fraud by Abuse of Position then bring them on.
AND WHAT AN HORS D'OEURVE!
One academic economist estimated that from this one announcement alone approximately 100,000 jobs are at risk!
Prof Colin Talbot, of Manchester Business School, said the total number of jobs lost could be close to 100,000. He estimated that 45,000 jobs would be cut among consultants, contractors and government suppliers. Another 40,000 would go in local councils and devolved administrations, and 10,000 from quangos, as well as 2,400 from a freeze on civil service recruitment, he said.
[source : More than 50,000 jobs 'at risk’ from £6.2bn cuts, The Daily Telegraph 24/5/2010]
And worse, much worse, is to come later this year.
The budget in June will make these numbers bigger and much more serious.
I do not want to hear these numbers, because they mean homes repossessed and families broken up, but if they help to rid us of the parasites, who have totally and deliberately screwed the global economy, as evidence that our financial status has been seriously harmed by the banks contrary to the Fraud Act 2006 Section 4 Fraud by Abuse of Position then bring them on.
Monday, May 24, 2010
BLACKWELL BRIGGS ARE COMPLETE PLONKERS
Have you seen this video in which a complete plonker demands you give Blackwell Briggs a chance to build a one world surveillance government, and released on Conspiracy For Good website?
Of course, if you are not given a job, because your DNA in their DNA database states you cannot have a job, or for whatever reason, then despite their obvious desire to look after you, to love you, then you can starve to death, like the rest of the designated scum.
For that's what you are; SCUM!
You are scum if
1. you cannot or will not make them a profit
2. see through their fascist one world government bullshit and all the transparent false flag acts of terrorism and wars designed to empower such a global government.
In which case, I'm proud to be scum!
Fuck you, traitors! Traitors to my ancestors, traitors to your very own ancestors, who fought and died in the engineered wars, world and regional, with the goal of betraying our nations into the hands of a tyrannical world government.
What a plonker!
And Blackwell Briggs are complete plonkers!
In fact, they should be in the Oxford English Dictionary.
Plonker: David Rockefeller, Anyone from the Rothschild family serving the one world agenda e.g. Lord Jacob, Blackwell Briggs and that fool standing on the top of an office in their ad for one world government.
Once these fuckers get their one world government they will drastically reduce the human population to below one billion. It's in the UNEP Biodiversity Assessment Section 11.2.3.2.
And guess who funded that?
Yep! That plonker David "We sponsored the Nazis" Rockefeller!
And guess whose been to bed with him? Yep, those plonkers Blair and Brown.,
So what makes you think you'll survive?
You won't! The odds are you won't. So come join us, now, and fight this scum.
Of course, if you are not given a job, because your DNA in their DNA database states you cannot have a job, or for whatever reason, then despite their obvious desire to look after you, to love you, then you can starve to death, like the rest of the designated scum.
For that's what you are; SCUM!
You are scum if
1. you cannot or will not make them a profit
2. see through their fascist one world government bullshit and all the transparent false flag acts of terrorism and wars designed to empower such a global government.
In which case, I'm proud to be scum!
Fuck you, traitors! Traitors to my ancestors, traitors to your very own ancestors, who fought and died in the engineered wars, world and regional, with the goal of betraying our nations into the hands of a tyrannical world government.
What a plonker!
And Blackwell Briggs are complete plonkers!
In fact, they should be in the Oxford English Dictionary.
Plonker: David Rockefeller, Anyone from the Rothschild family serving the one world agenda e.g. Lord Jacob, Blackwell Briggs and that fool standing on the top of an office in their ad for one world government.
Once these fuckers get their one world government they will drastically reduce the human population to below one billion. It's in the UNEP Biodiversity Assessment Section 11.2.3.2.
And guess who funded that?
Yep! That plonker David "We sponsored the Nazis" Rockefeller!
And guess whose been to bed with him? Yep, those plonkers Blair and Brown.,
So what makes you think you'll survive?
You won't! The odds are you won't. So come join us, now, and fight this scum.
MORE PAN-EUROPEAN ECONOMIC GOVERNANCE DUE TO EURO CRISIS
Guess what the Eurocrats are going to do because of the crisis with the Euro? Yep, that's right. More European economic governance. Well, they call it governance, but I call it integration, don't you?
Bilderberger Jose Manuel Barosso said
And apparently,
[source : EU leaders to focus on tougher economic governance, FT 24/5/2010 ]
So, let's recap what's happened with Europe.
1. Divided after WW2 after Stalin was allowed to take Eastern Europe (as part of the Pike three world war plan), even though we went to war to defend Eastern Europe, didn't we?
2. Bilderberg is created and vows to create the EU and the Euro in Western Europe, which they do, allegedly as a defence against Soviet aggression and expansion
3. The Berlin Wall falls, after Gorbachev sold out to the Rockefellers and the one world eutopia, allowing expansion into Eastern Europe
4. the EU and Eurozone then expand into Eastern Europe, as does NATO, consuming many former Eastern Bloc nations
5. but in order to get those nations, both East and West, to sign up to the EU and Euro many lies were told, numbers massaged, and the people were not allowed to vote, and when they did vote they voted Non!
6. the lies are now being exposed and derivatives are also destablising the Euro as those who knew what was coming placed their bets in anticipation of profit and manipulation.
Ordo Ab Chao.
Bilderberger Jose Manuel Barosso said
"We must better co-ordinate our economic policy, otherwise we will not be able to stabilise the single currency,"
And apparently,
The EU leaders’ talks on June 17-18 will focus on a progress report to be submitted by a task force led by Herman van Rompuy, the EU president, and including Jean-Claude Trichet, the European Central Bank president, and Olli Rehn, the EU monetary affairs commissioner, as well as most of the euro area’s 16 finance ministers.
[source : EU leaders to focus on tougher economic governance, FT 24/5/2010 ]
So, let's recap what's happened with Europe.
1. Divided after WW2 after Stalin was allowed to take Eastern Europe (as part of the Pike three world war plan), even though we went to war to defend Eastern Europe, didn't we?
2. Bilderberg is created and vows to create the EU and the Euro in Western Europe, which they do, allegedly as a defence against Soviet aggression and expansion
3. The Berlin Wall falls, after Gorbachev sold out to the Rockefellers and the one world eutopia, allowing expansion into Eastern Europe
4. the EU and Eurozone then expand into Eastern Europe, as does NATO, consuming many former Eastern Bloc nations
5. but in order to get those nations, both East and West, to sign up to the EU and Euro many lies were told, numbers massaged, and the people were not allowed to vote, and when they did vote they voted Non!
6. the lies are now being exposed and derivatives are also destablising the Euro as those who knew what was coming placed their bets in anticipation of profit and manipulation.
Ordo Ab Chao.
WE'LL GET YOU SON OF SAM
In Spike Lee's Summer of Sam there is a scene in which the neighbourhood where the Son of Sam murders are taking place come out in force, with baseball bats, road blocks etc. hunting Berkowitz aka Mr Monster. They march down the streets at night, waving their baseball bats in the air, shouting, "We'll get you Son of Sam! We'll get you Son of Sam! We'll get you Son of Sam! We'll get you Son of Sam!..."
And do you know what? They did!
How? Because Berkowitz fucked up.
Berkowitz, like the Dark Forces, was not perfect and made mistakes, sometimes very big mistakes.
Just like the NWO has, with their derivatives and their arrogance and their lack of intelligence and their unnecessary wars financed by their unnecessary banks and their faith in Obummer and their faith in you being as unintelligent as them.
And do you know what? They did!
How? Because Berkowitz fucked up.
Berkowitz, like the Dark Forces, was not perfect and made mistakes, sometimes very big mistakes.
Just like the NWO has, with their derivatives and their arrogance and their lack of intelligence and their unnecessary wars financed by their unnecessary banks and their faith in Obummer and their faith in you being as unintelligent as them.
BROWN SAID HE WOULD DEVOTE HIS LIFE TO CHARITY BUT HE NOW WANTS TO RUN THE WORLD
He blubbed on TV about the death of his child.
He told us he would devote his post-PM life to charity.
But now he wants to run the world as head of the IMF!!
Last year the current head of the IMF, Bilderberger Strauss-Kahn, admitted that the IMF was aiming to control the world economy. The IMF was given loadsamoney from the G20 for that purpose. Bilderberg banks have been cheekily and sneakily destroying national economies through derivatives and now the IMF is riding in on a white horse to save the day. Hurrah!
And it is now, after Brown encouraged the City to go on its derivatives spree thus allowing the Bilderberg banks to destroy those national economies, that Bilderberg Brown wants to head the Bilderberg IMF as it begins its Bilderberg power grab.
And it appears he would get that Bilderberg job!
You've gotta laugh otherwise you'd cry...
Brown
1. sold our gold at low, low prices as part of a Bilderberg conspiracy to suppress gold prices
2. was for unnecessary war after unnecessary war, and then some more unnecessary war
3. encouraged the City derivatives gambling with light-touch, ie non-existent, regulation, which has left us with nearly £200 billion deficit
4. but expanded the police state with more heavy-touch regulation of the British people such as DNA databases, ID cards etc
As head of the IMF he would be perfick.
=========================================
From http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/176657/Gordon-Brown-first-choice-for-top-job-at-IMF
GORDON BROWN 'FIRST CHOICE' FOR TOP JOB AT IMF
By Ted Jeory
GORDON Brown wants one of the world’s most important economic jobs as head of the International Monetary Fund, according to his closest school friend.
Tom Brown said that his 59-year-old pal believes he has “one big job left in him”.
And IMF insiders are thought to consider the former Prime Minister the ideal candidate to take over when France’s Dominique Strauss-Kahn’s term ends in 2012.
Tom Brown said last night: “Gordon’s record would make him first choice. His motive for taking it, or another job like it, would be his ambition to tackle world poverty and his anger at the plight of many millions of people around the world who live on the knife’s edge of bare existence.”
He told us he would devote his post-PM life to charity.
But now he wants to run the world as head of the IMF!!
Last year the current head of the IMF, Bilderberger Strauss-Kahn, admitted that the IMF was aiming to control the world economy. The IMF was given loadsamoney from the G20 for that purpose. Bilderberg banks have been cheekily and sneakily destroying national economies through derivatives and now the IMF is riding in on a white horse to save the day. Hurrah!
And it is now, after Brown encouraged the City to go on its derivatives spree thus allowing the Bilderberg banks to destroy those national economies, that Bilderberg Brown wants to head the Bilderberg IMF as it begins its Bilderberg power grab.
And it appears he would get that Bilderberg job!
You've gotta laugh otherwise you'd cry...
Brown
1. sold our gold at low, low prices as part of a Bilderberg conspiracy to suppress gold prices
2. was for unnecessary war after unnecessary war, and then some more unnecessary war
3. encouraged the City derivatives gambling with light-touch, ie non-existent, regulation, which has left us with nearly £200 billion deficit
4. but expanded the police state with more heavy-touch regulation of the British people such as DNA databases, ID cards etc
As head of the IMF he would be perfick.
=========================================
From http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/176657/Gordon-Brown-first-choice-for-top-job-at-IMF
GORDON BROWN 'FIRST CHOICE' FOR TOP JOB AT IMF
By Ted Jeory
GORDON Brown wants one of the world’s most important economic jobs as head of the International Monetary Fund, according to his closest school friend.
Tom Brown said that his 59-year-old pal believes he has “one big job left in him”.
And IMF insiders are thought to consider the former Prime Minister the ideal candidate to take over when France’s Dominique Strauss-Kahn’s term ends in 2012.
Tom Brown said last night: “Gordon’s record would make him first choice. His motive for taking it, or another job like it, would be his ambition to tackle world poverty and his anger at the plight of many millions of people around the world who live on the knife’s edge of bare existence.”
Saturday, May 22, 2010
YOU CAN HAVE BOTH RED SAUCE AND BROWN SAUCE
In Danny Baker's world famous Sausage Sandwich Game the eater of the aforementioned sausage sandwich has just three options as to what have with the sausage.
1. red sauce
2. brown sauce
3. no sauce at all
But what I am incandescent with rage is this; why can the sausage sandwich eater not have BOTH red sauce AND brown sauce on his or her sausage sandwich?
It is the most fundamental and profound questions of the day, and surely all options must be available to the eater of the sausage sandwich.
I mean, Nobel Peace Prize winner Obummer is sending yet more US military to start a war with Iran. All options must be considered, and if the option you want is not there then just make it up and send the US military to kill people. So effectively, by sending more US military to start war with Iran Nobel Peace Prize winner Obummer is having both red sauce and brown sauce with his sausage sandwich.
Right?
1. red sauce
2. brown sauce
3. no sauce at all
But what I am incandescent with rage is this; why can the sausage sandwich eater not have BOTH red sauce AND brown sauce on his or her sausage sandwich?
It is the most fundamental and profound questions of the day, and surely all options must be available to the eater of the sausage sandwich.
I mean, Nobel Peace Prize winner Obummer is sending yet more US military to start a war with Iran. All options must be considered, and if the option you want is not there then just make it up and send the US military to kill people. So effectively, by sending more US military to start war with Iran Nobel Peace Prize winner Obummer is having both red sauce and brown sauce with his sausage sandwich.
Right?
Friday, May 21, 2010
COCAINE COCAINE GOES STRAIGHT INTO YOUR BRAIN
This is one of the tunes that made me very uncomfortable about the 'rave' scene. I would have been there that night, but always privately questioning...what is socially going on?
I would have been there that night, but not on coke. It is possible I was singled for satellite terrorism for that...
Looking back it should have been called the 'suicide' scene.
But who would produce such a tune? This was in 1991! Well before Webb's expose.
About 5:20 in to the video below....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZEePIo26S4c&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cKixoyvqigU&feature=related
Another favourite, what happened to the music?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=07mcuWYOGIE&feature=related
I would have been there that night, but not on coke. It is possible I was singled for satellite terrorism for that...
Looking back it should have been called the 'suicide' scene.
But who would produce such a tune? This was in 1991! Well before Webb's expose.
About 5:20 in to the video below....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZEePIo26S4c&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cKixoyvqigU&feature=related
Another favourite, what happened to the music?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=07mcuWYOGIE&feature=related
A QUESTION OF TIMING
Would you cause so much financial chaos and destruction and fraud if you didn't have a plan to avoid prosecution?
It is no coincidence to me that Obummer, despite the peace offerings of Iran, is sending a massive deployment of US military to Iran.
The Pike WW3 fix is in.
If the USA/Israel/UK bombs Iran then expect a CIA/MI6/Mossad-spooked-up terror attack in the USA, possibly UK and Israel, which will be used to implement a terrible police state in the USA/UK/Israel.
That's my fear, and I don't think it is unfounded.
It is no coincidence to me that Obummer, despite the peace offerings of Iran, is sending a massive deployment of US military to Iran.
The Pike WW3 fix is in.
If the USA/Israel/UK bombs Iran then expect a CIA/MI6/Mossad-spooked-up terror attack in the USA, possibly UK and Israel, which will be used to implement a terrible police state in the USA/UK/Israel.
That's my fear, and I don't think it is unfounded.
AM I RIGHT?
(you're not wrong!)
Classic Alan Partridge chat, from the first show of the first series of Knowing Me Knowing You With Alan Partridge, or KMKYWAP.
Am I right? Well, I've always believed that no matter what WW3 would be caused by a global war between the Zionists and the Muslims.
Yeah, there might be some sideshows like the Korean bollocks (which could be more related to Tomorrow Never Dies than anything else).
But the real anger and vitriol and potential for WW3 would always always always come from something in the Middle East.
Now, Nobel Peace Prize winner (!!) and Wall Street cocksucker BarakSoetero Obummer is sending yet more US military naval power to confront Iran...after Iran struck a deal with Turkey and Brazil.
If you still had any dreamy dreams about Obummer, after his multi-trillion dollar bailout of his biggest contributors to his campaign, Wall Street, then this belligerent action must surely kill those doubts and scream at you that the man, if you can call him that, is a complete fraud and more dangerous to you and your family than the village idiot George W Bush.
Let's face facts.
The aggressive land-grabbing terrorist Zionist state of Israel has nukes. Hundreds of 'em. We know this because Rothschild spies gave the technology to Israel. Israel has not signed upto the NPT. Israel's nukes is one of those subjects you are not allowed to discuss.
Yet Iran, despite being given the initial technology through the US Atoms For Peace Program does NOT have a bomb, has signed up to the NPT and has recently decided to rest its nuclear future with Turkey and Brazil, is still the ever-growing focus for war of a Nobel Peace Prize winner Obummer!
Now, are we living in a sane world or a Zionist insane world?
Use your God-given brain...PLEASE!
99.9% of Israeli Jews do not understand how and why their beloved state was created, and how it is being used today to create yet another global war.
The seeds were sown decades ago, but the roots of the weeds can still be dug up and thrown into the fire to never cause a threat again.
Ask yourself; why is alleged man of peace Obummer sending many more US military to the Persian Gulf now?
Classic Alan Partridge chat, from the first show of the first series of Knowing Me Knowing You With Alan Partridge, or KMKYWAP.
Am I right? Well, I've always believed that no matter what WW3 would be caused by a global war between the Zionists and the Muslims.
Yeah, there might be some sideshows like the Korean bollocks (which could be more related to Tomorrow Never Dies than anything else).
But the real anger and vitriol and potential for WW3 would always always always come from something in the Middle East.
Now, Nobel Peace Prize winner (!!) and Wall Street cocksucker Barak
If you still had any dreamy dreams about Obummer, after his multi-trillion dollar bailout of his biggest contributors to his campaign, Wall Street, then this belligerent action must surely kill those doubts and scream at you that the man, if you can call him that, is a complete fraud and more dangerous to you and your family than the village idiot George W Bush.
Let's face facts.
The aggressive land-grabbing terrorist Zionist state of Israel has nukes. Hundreds of 'em. We know this because Rothschild spies gave the technology to Israel. Israel has not signed upto the NPT. Israel's nukes is one of those subjects you are not allowed to discuss.
Yet Iran, despite being given the initial technology through the US Atoms For Peace Program does NOT have a bomb, has signed up to the NPT and has recently decided to rest its nuclear future with Turkey and Brazil, is still the ever-growing focus for war of a Nobel Peace Prize winner Obummer!
Now, are we living in a sane world or a Zionist insane world?
Use your God-given brain...PLEASE!
99.9% of Israeli Jews do not understand how and why their beloved state was created, and how it is being used today to create yet another global war.
The seeds were sown decades ago, but the roots of the weeds can still be dug up and thrown into the fire to never cause a threat again.
Ask yourself; why is alleged man of peace Obummer sending many more US military to the Persian Gulf now?
SYNTHETIC LIFE NEEDS NATURAL DNA
And synthetic means?
not natural?
This guy Craig Venter was involved in the Human Genome Project, which was a revival of the USA eugenics program after WW2. Only Venter decided to exploit the public information on DNA and create a private company called Celera which withheld its findings despite a court ruling ordering it to release its findings.
But, does Venter's work explain why our DNA is being taken from us?
Our DNA has been taken from us for years for the most trivial reason, if a reason was provided at all.
In the UK we think we've got it bad when our DNA is taken from us if we are arrested for the most trivial of crimes and not even charged!
In the USA students cannot enroll if they don't give up their DNA!
In the USA DNA is taken in some states at birth!
Just why is the NWO so obessed with DNA?
Why do they want ours?
Well perhaps Venter's work explains this DNA grab.
He has successfully created a small organism, using DNA.
How easy would it be to engineer a human with the 'correct' DNA for the NWO; a thuggish, unquestioning slave to exploit and send into wars.
It's still a long way off...for now.
But I think Venter has bought into the idea and has recognised the power that would come with being able to create a human with specific DNA.
not natural?
This guy Craig Venter was involved in the Human Genome Project, which was a revival of the USA eugenics program after WW2. Only Venter decided to exploit the public information on DNA and create a private company called Celera which withheld its findings despite a court ruling ordering it to release its findings.
But, does Venter's work explain why our DNA is being taken from us?
Our DNA has been taken from us for years for the most trivial reason, if a reason was provided at all.
In the UK we think we've got it bad when our DNA is taken from us if we are arrested for the most trivial of crimes and not even charged!
In the USA students cannot enroll if they don't give up their DNA!
In the USA DNA is taken in some states at birth!
Just why is the NWO so obessed with DNA?
Why do they want ours?
Well perhaps Venter's work explains this DNA grab.
He has successfully created a small organism, using DNA.
How easy would it be to engineer a human with the 'correct' DNA for the NWO; a thuggish, unquestioning slave to exploit and send into wars.
It's still a long way off...for now.
But I think Venter has bought into the idea and has recognised the power that would come with being able to create a human with specific DNA.
77=56=5
July 7th 2005 resulted in 56 deaths and should have been stopped by 5, i.e. MI5.
MI5 had the alleged bombers under surveillance for over a year.
At first MI5 told the incompetent treasonous criminal Intelligence and Security Committee that the alleged bombers were 'clean skins', i.e. unknown, and the ISC believed them.
But then it was discovered that the alleged bombers were not unknown to MI5 but had actually been bugged and followed and recorded saying they wanted to join the Jihad. The threat was considered so strong that an agent was inserted into the suburb of Leeds where the suspects lived, an agent with a military background, who pretended to be a Jihadi. He reported to West Yorkshire Police, who say they reported the agents findings upwards, i.e. to Special Branch/MI5.
MI5 also told the ISC that they don't do torture. But interestingly Hague is going to create a commission to investigate very believable allegations of MI5 collusion in torture.
Hmm.
So, having a mathematical background, can 77=56=5?
I hope I live long enough to read the solution.
MI5 had the alleged bombers under surveillance for over a year.
At first MI5 told the incompetent treasonous criminal Intelligence and Security Committee that the alleged bombers were 'clean skins', i.e. unknown, and the ISC believed them.
But then it was discovered that the alleged bombers were not unknown to MI5 but had actually been bugged and followed and recorded saying they wanted to join the Jihad. The threat was considered so strong that an agent was inserted into the suburb of Leeds where the suspects lived, an agent with a military background, who pretended to be a Jihadi. He reported to West Yorkshire Police, who say they reported the agents findings upwards, i.e. to Special Branch/MI5.
MI5 also told the ISC that they don't do torture. But interestingly Hague is going to create a commission to investigate very believable allegations of MI5 collusion in torture.
Hmm.
So, having a mathematical background, can 77=56=5?
I hope I live long enough to read the solution.
HOW CAN GOOGLE BE CIA AND NSA WHEN THEY ARE SO SHIT?
Google is CIA and NSA.
Just check up on the seed money for Google and think about the rich minefield of human thought that a search engine could process. But not only that, think about how society could be directed by the info and results from such a search engine.
Yet now since I downloaded Google Earth every time I login to my laptop I always get this Google End User Licence bullshit, and the only solution I know of is to stop the process. I've tried several suggestions of deleting the registry, but none have worked.
What's the solutionCIA NSA Google, or anyone else?
Just check up on the seed money for Google and think about the rich minefield of human thought that a search engine could process. But not only that, think about how society could be directed by the info and results from such a search engine.
Yet now since I downloaded Google Earth every time I login to my laptop I always get this Google End User Licence bullshit, and the only solution I know of is to stop the process. I've tried several suggestions of deleting the registry, but none have worked.
What's the solution
Thursday, May 20, 2010
THE COALITION BANKING REFORM
If you can call it that.
The commission to investigate breaking up the banks has one year to report, and the findings will not be binding, i.e. it could be a complete waste of time.
But on the plus side, possibly, is the financial advice centre to be financed by a "new social responsibility levy on the financial services sector".
[source : http://media.ft.com/cms/e241587a-63fb-11df-ad7c-00144feab49a.pdf ]
And the coalition is also going to "create a single agency to take on the work of tackling serious economic crime that is currently done by, among others, the Serious Fraud Office, Financial Services Authority and Office of Fair Trading".
But ask yourself this. These political parties bang on about "prison works". You name me one of the prime suspects (and we all know who they are) who has gone to prison for completely fucking up the economy? That's right! NOBODY!
Where's the deterrent in that? A few small fines and/or barred from the City for a while. WOW!
I hope that the new financial advice centre will not just offer advice as the FSA did, for example about the difference between a debit and credit card, but to also educate the people about just how drug-riddled, bankrupt and fraudulent the real banking system is.
I believe the FSMA 2000 gave the FSA the statutory duty to do this. Brown instead told them to sit with their thumbs up their arses while the City wrecked not just the UK but Europe and America too!
So I have not been dissuaded from going ahead with dragging Bilderberg into the dock, even if that means dragging Clarke into the fray.
The commission to investigate breaking up the banks has one year to report, and the findings will not be binding, i.e. it could be a complete waste of time.
But on the plus side, possibly, is the financial advice centre to be financed by a "new social responsibility levy on the financial services sector".
[source : http://media.ft.com/cms/e241587a-63fb-11df-ad7c-00144feab49a.pdf ]
And the coalition is also going to "create a single agency to take on the work of tackling serious economic crime that is currently done by, among others, the Serious Fraud Office, Financial Services Authority and Office of Fair Trading".
But ask yourself this. These political parties bang on about "prison works". You name me one of the prime suspects (and we all know who they are) who has gone to prison for completely fucking up the economy? That's right! NOBODY!
Where's the deterrent in that? A few small fines and/or barred from the City for a while. WOW!
I hope that the new financial advice centre will not just offer advice as the FSA did, for example about the difference between a debit and credit card, but to also educate the people about just how drug-riddled, bankrupt and fraudulent the real banking system is.
I believe the FSMA 2000 gave the FSA the statutory duty to do this. Brown instead told them to sit with their thumbs up their arses while the City wrecked not just the UK but Europe and America too!
So I have not been dissuaded from going ahead with dragging Bilderberg into the dock, even if that means dragging Clarke into the fray.
OH DARK FORCES, DARK FORCES! WHEREFORE ART THOU DARK FORCES?
Uh, I don't know.
I know where they were and what they were doing on 31st August 1997.
And where they were and what they were doing on 11th September 2001.
But now? AWOL.
I know where they were and what they were doing on 31st August 1997.
And where they were and what they were doing on 11th September 2001.
But now? AWOL.
Wednesday, May 19, 2010
SUICIDE IS PAINLESS
I never got to see MASH, but the recent ruling that doctors must be respectful of living wills, no matter what the circumstances that the will was created under (and the global current financial crisis is putting alot of elderly and disabled to think they are a burden), led me to think of the theme tune.
I have no intention of committing suicide, but some might, those with dreams that are not coming true...
ps this has been identified already as part of the eugenics plan of the current financial crisis due to the Nazi heritage of Bilderberg.
=====================================
From http://www.stlyrics.com/lyrics/televisiontvthemelyrics-50s60s70s/mash.htm
Through early morning fog I see
visions of the things to be
the pains that are withheld for me
I realize and I can see...
[chorus]:
That suicide is painless
It brings on many changes
and I can take or leave it if I please.
I try to find a way to make
all our little joys relate
without that ever-present hate
but now I know that it's too late, and...
[Chorus]
The game of life is hard to play
I'm gonna lose it anyway
The losing card I'll someday lay
so this is all I have to say.
[Chorus]
The only way to win is cheat
And lay it down before I'm beat
and to another give my seat
for that's the only painless feat.
[Chorus]
MASH
The sword of time will pierce our skins
It doesn't hurt when it begins
But as it works its way on in
The pain grows stronger...watch it grin, but...
[Chorus]
A brave man once requested me
to answer questions that are key
'is it to be or not to be'
and I replied 'oh why ask me?'
'Cause suicide is painless
it brings on many changes
and I can take or leave it if I please.
...and you can do the same thing if you choose.
I have no intention of committing suicide, but some might, those with dreams that are not coming true...
ps this has been identified already as part of the eugenics plan of the current financial crisis due to the Nazi heritage of Bilderberg.
=====================================
From http://www.stlyrics.com/lyrics/televisiontvthemelyrics-50s60s70s/mash.htm
Through early morning fog I see
visions of the things to be
the pains that are withheld for me
I realize and I can see...
[chorus]:
That suicide is painless
It brings on many changes
and I can take or leave it if I please.
I try to find a way to make
all our little joys relate
without that ever-present hate
but now I know that it's too late, and...
[Chorus]
The game of life is hard to play
I'm gonna lose it anyway
The losing card I'll someday lay
so this is all I have to say.
[Chorus]
The only way to win is cheat
And lay it down before I'm beat
and to another give my seat
for that's the only painless feat.
[Chorus]
MASH
The sword of time will pierce our skins
It doesn't hurt when it begins
But as it works its way on in
The pain grows stronger...watch it grin, but...
[Chorus]
A brave man once requested me
to answer questions that are key
'is it to be or not to be'
and I replied 'oh why ask me?'
'Cause suicide is painless
it brings on many changes
and I can take or leave it if I please.
...and you can do the same thing if you choose.
PSST! YOU, YES YOU, CAN STOP THIS
Yes, you can!
Obummer lied. He had no intention of doing it.
But you can.
Violence is neither required or desired.
Just realise that you and your parents and grandparents have been screwed left, right and centre for decades, either fighting unnecessary wars and/or bailing out unnecessary banks.
Unnecessary wars.
Unnecessary banks.
IT REALLY IS THAT SIMPLE!
Can you do it? YES YOU CAN!
Obummer lied. He had no intention of doing it.
But you can.
Violence is neither required or desired.
Just realise that you and your parents and grandparents have been screwed left, right and centre for decades, either fighting unnecessary wars and/or bailing out unnecessary banks.
Unnecessary wars.
Unnecessary banks.
IT REALLY IS THAT SIMPLE!
Can you do it? YES YOU CAN!
PSST! DON'T TELL THE NEW WORLD ORDER BUT I THINK WE'RE WINNING.
D'you know what? I can see the end...and it is nigh.
The end is nigh...not for us, but for them.
The size of Rand Paul's victory is not a mixed message : it's a FUCK YOU!
But Paul's victory, and those to come, bring an even newer Pearl Harbor, or a madman irrational attack on Iran or Russia, even closer. Turkey's deal with Iran may have scuppered the preferred Clean Break/Rebuilding America's Defenses plan. But there is always something to watch out for...
So keep your eyes and ears wide open for anything out of the ordinary and report only to people you trust.
The New World Order are playing for keeps, to keep you and your family (if they are allowed to live) in permanent slavery, but they are not invincible.
The end is nigh...not for us, but for them.
The size of Rand Paul's victory is not a mixed message : it's a FUCK YOU!
But Paul's victory, and those to come, bring an even newer Pearl Harbor, or a madman irrational attack on Iran or Russia, even closer. Turkey's deal with Iran may have scuppered the preferred Clean Break/Rebuilding America's Defenses plan. But there is always something to watch out for...
So keep your eyes and ears wide open for anything out of the ordinary and report only to people you trust.
The New World Order are playing for keeps, to keep you and your family (if they are allowed to live) in permanent slavery, but they are not invincible.
JUST HOW BIG A CHEEKY ASS IS JAMIE DIMON?
Can you believe what Jamie Dimon, the CEO of JP Morgan Chase, the original source and current master of the derivative and main benefactor of the current financial crisis, said to the Senate?
He (or should that be David Rockefeller?) has asked Congress that the TBTFs should not be stopped from trading in derivatives.
[source : Dimon warns on derivatives reform, FT 19/5/2010]
Never mind that his bank JPMC started, controls and benefits the most from such trading!
UNBE-FUCKING-LIEVABLE!
Perhaps in a veiled threat, as was issued just before the TARP (or should that be the TRAP?), Dimon warned that markets might get disrupted and destabilised if they can't fuck the world even more with these derivatives!!
IN-FUCKING-CREDIBLE!
He (or should that be David Rockefeller?) has asked Congress that the TBTFs should not be stopped from trading in derivatives.
[source : Dimon warns on derivatives reform, FT 19/5/2010]
Never mind that his bank JPMC started, controls and benefits the most from such trading!
UNBE-FUCKING-LIEVABLE!
Perhaps in a veiled threat, as was issued just before the TARP (or should that be the TRAP?), Dimon warned that markets might get disrupted and destabilised if they can't fuck the world even more with these derivatives!!
IN-FUCKING-CREDIBLE!
FIRST THEY CAME FOR THE BILDERBERGERS
First they came for the Bilderbergers, but I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Bilderberger.
Then they came for the Trilaterals, but I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Trilateral.
Then they came for the CFRs, but I didn't speak up because I wasn't a CFR.
Then they came for me, but by then there were no more New World Order traitors to arrest and bang up to eat porridge for the rest of their stinking miserable lives, so we all had a few cold beers and celebrated 'til dawn, then got our planet working for the good of the people.
Then they came for the Trilaterals, but I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Trilateral.
Then they came for the CFRs, but I didn't speak up because I wasn't a CFR.
Then they came for me, but by then there were no more New World Order traitors to arrest and bang up to eat porridge for the rest of their stinking miserable lives, so we all had a few cold beers and celebrated 'til dawn, then got our planet working for the good of the people.
BILDERBERG NEARLY BUSTED
Well, I said 2010 would be the year of breaking Bilderberg...
Daniel Estulin is to speak before the European Parliament to bring Bilderberg to EMPs attention. This is quite a significant PR coup for the anti-Bilderberg Group, but does not quite break Bilderberg, but you can definitely hear the creaks and groans as Bilderberg comes under so much stress and strain.
As for me, I'm waiting for Osborne's budget on 22nd June for numbers, and then going ahead with applying the Fraud Act 2006 Section 4, Fraud By Abuse of Position. With the Euro currently in complete turmoil and being bailed out by everyone, including us, they don't stand a chance.
Daniel Estulin is to speak before the European Parliament to bring Bilderberg to EMPs attention. This is quite a significant PR coup for the anti-Bilderberg Group, but does not quite break Bilderberg, but you can definitely hear the creaks and groans as Bilderberg comes under so much stress and strain.
As for me, I'm waiting for Osborne's budget on 22nd June for numbers, and then going ahead with applying the Fraud Act 2006 Section 4, Fraud By Abuse of Position. With the Euro currently in complete turmoil and being bailed out by everyone, including us, they don't stand a chance.
BILDERBERG BALLS TO RUN FOR LABOUR LEADERSHIP
This is the news we've all been waiting to hear!
Bilderberger Ed Balls is to run for Leader of the The Labour Party. He said he delayed his announcement to stand for election to allow the media to focus on the Milibands, Tweedle Dum and Tweedle Dee.
I'm not a betting man, but I might stick a tenner on Balls.
Bilderberger Ed Balls is to run for Leader of the The Labour Party. He said he delayed his announcement to stand for election to allow the media to focus on the Milibands, Tweedle Dum and Tweedle Dee.
I'm not a betting man, but I might stick a tenner on Balls.
WW3 POSTPONED
Iran's deal with Turkey looks to have irritated the Zionazis and postponed WW3 for a few years, which must be used by us to further weaken the NWO here and accelerate the awakening. But I would not be surprised if Israel now bombed or invaded Turkey for some trumped up reason...
Saturday, May 15, 2010
HUMANOIDS! YOU HAVE NOTHING TO LOSE BUT YOUR MICROCHIP IMPLANTS!
You may not be implanted now, but it's coming...very soon.
I've told you what's happened to me, and I don't have a microchip implant (as far as I know).
The military technology is decades in advance of what is in the public arena. It kinda makes sense that it is, for we are always told to always keep a surprise up your sleeve, to not reveal your true situation.
But that is exactly what the government wants you to do, to allow total government encroachment into your lives, while claiming national security whenever you make any enquiry into government operations beyond the bleedin' obvious.
So imagine this; a terrorist attack occurs in the USA more devastating than 9/11, possibly nuclear in some way. No serious investigation is carried out by the USA government. The perps are identified by the CIA, FBI, NSA etc almost immediately (yet they spectacularly failed to identify such an attack). The USA government, and its Zionazi allies, then declare war on the CIA/FBI/NSA-identified perps...probably Iran, but maybe even Russia! And then it gets really, really nasty...
Would you allow a microchip implant to be injected into you then? Because that is coming...very soon.
I've told you what's happened to me, and I don't have a microchip implant (as far as I know).
The military technology is decades in advance of what is in the public arena. It kinda makes sense that it is, for we are always told to always keep a surprise up your sleeve, to not reveal your true situation.
But that is exactly what the government wants you to do, to allow total government encroachment into your lives, while claiming national security whenever you make any enquiry into government operations beyond the bleedin' obvious.
So imagine this; a terrorist attack occurs in the USA more devastating than 9/11, possibly nuclear in some way. No serious investigation is carried out by the USA government. The perps are identified by the CIA, FBI, NSA etc almost immediately (yet they spectacularly failed to identify such an attack). The USA government, and its Zionazi allies, then declare war on the CIA/FBI/NSA-identified perps...probably Iran, but maybe even Russia! And then it gets really, really nasty...
Would you allow a microchip implant to be injected into you then? Because that is coming...very soon.
THE GLOBAL WAR ON VINCE CABLE
The Global War on Vince Cable (GWOV) has begun. The aim of GWOV is to reduce his power, if not to displace him completely (for the sake of the coalition), so that his apparently strong anti-derivative policies does not destroy the banking policies that have caused such chaos. Yesterday there were several articles praising the City for being so great over the last few years for raising so much tax revenue. Well, that's no good now, is it. Those taxes have been blown on unnecessary wars and the police state. Now, thanks to the City, public services and jobs are going to get slashed, taxes raised, a while the merry bankers have all their bonuses off-shore.
=============================
From http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article7127382.ece
Revealed: Cable’s last ditch calls to Brown
Roland Watson, Suzy Jagger, Sam Coates, Tom Baldwin
Vince Cable told Gordon Brown repeatedly that he did not want to go into coalition with the Conservatives, according to insider accounts of the talks that reshaped British politics.
Dr Cable, the deputy Liberal Democrat leader, used a series of telephone calls with Mr Brown to emphasise that he regarded a deal with the Tories as the least palatable option for his party, The Times has learnt.
=============================
From http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article7127382.ece
Revealed: Cable’s last ditch calls to Brown
Roland Watson, Suzy Jagger, Sam Coates, Tom Baldwin
Vince Cable told Gordon Brown repeatedly that he did not want to go into coalition with the Conservatives, according to insider accounts of the talks that reshaped British politics.
Dr Cable, the deputy Liberal Democrat leader, used a series of telephone calls with Mr Brown to emphasise that he regarded a deal with the Tories as the least palatable option for his party, The Times has learnt.
Thursday, May 13, 2010
I KNOW WHY BIG BILDERBERG KEN CLARKE IS NOW IN CHARGE OF THE LAW
It's to try to stop my challenges to the law citing Bilderberg etc.
Nice try, Ken! But you're onto a loser there...
Does this show my arguments have merit, and are causing great concern?
That they don't have faith in their own bullshit laws?
Just think of that Churchill Insurance dog again...Oh Yes!
BTW does that dog look like Clarke, or what? Except Clarke will be saying Oh No, with his Bilderberg head in his hands.
Nice try, Ken! But you're onto a loser there...
Does this show my arguments have merit, and are causing great concern?
That they don't have faith in their own bullshit laws?
Just think of that Churchill Insurance dog again...Oh Yes!
BTW does that dog look like Clarke, or what? Except Clarke will be saying Oh No, with his Bilderberg head in his hands.
NOW WE'LL SEE WHERE OIK OSBORNE'S LOYALTIES LIE
Yesterday Vince Cable was heralded as the saviour of the British people, appointed Minister for Business and Banking. Cable was gonna rip the banks to shreds, we were told, so the retail and casino elements of the TBTFs would be separate and the derivatives gambling would be stopped.
But it now appears that Bilderberg Bullingdon Boy Osborne is going to oversee the investigation into breaking the banks up, and the investigation is only into the 'feasibility' of breaking up such banks. The coalition was formed to serve the best interests of THE NATION, not Bilderberg, was it not?
So we still have a long time to endure, possibly an eternity. For how long will the first feasibility study take to report? And even if that does find that it is feasible to break up the banks, how long will it take to implement the break up? And will derivatives still be permitted?
This is going to be very very interesting indeed.
Personally, I think the Bilderberg fix is in...
==============================
From http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/may/12/osborne-cable-bank-reforms
First coalition cracks emerge as Cable takes back seat to Osborne on banks
Chancellor to chair key committee and Treasury will remain in charge of banking policy and financial services sector
Vince Cable has been forced to let George Osborne take responsibility for reform of Britain's banks as the first cracks started to emerge at the top of the new coalition government.
Osborne, the newly appointed chancellor, had been quick to dismiss reports that Cable, named as the new business secretary by David Cameron today, would be in charge of an overhaul of the City and a potential break-up of the UK's major lenders. Sources close to Osborne said the Treasury was going to remain in charge of banking policy and the financial services sector, and that he would be chairing a key cabinet committee that would commission a top-level report into the feasibility of splitting the "casino" investment banking arms of banks from their mainstream high street operations.
But it now appears that Bilderberg Bullingdon Boy Osborne is going to oversee the investigation into breaking the banks up, and the investigation is only into the 'feasibility' of breaking up such banks. The coalition was formed to serve the best interests of THE NATION, not Bilderberg, was it not?
So we still have a long time to endure, possibly an eternity. For how long will the first feasibility study take to report? And even if that does find that it is feasible to break up the banks, how long will it take to implement the break up? And will derivatives still be permitted?
This is going to be very very interesting indeed.
Personally, I think the Bilderberg fix is in...
==============================
From http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/may/12/osborne-cable-bank-reforms
First coalition cracks emerge as Cable takes back seat to Osborne on banks
Chancellor to chair key committee and Treasury will remain in charge of banking policy and financial services sector
Vince Cable has been forced to let George Osborne take responsibility for reform of Britain's banks as the first cracks started to emerge at the top of the new coalition government.
Osborne, the newly appointed chancellor, had been quick to dismiss reports that Cable, named as the new business secretary by David Cameron today, would be in charge of an overhaul of the City and a potential break-up of the UK's major lenders. Sources close to Osborne said the Treasury was going to remain in charge of banking policy and the financial services sector, and that he would be chairing a key cabinet committee that would commission a top-level report into the feasibility of splitting the "casino" investment banking arms of banks from their mainstream high street operations.
Wednesday, May 12, 2010
FT BILDERBERGER WOLF CALLS FOR MORE EUROPEAN INTEGRATION
Last week it was Munchau.
Now, after the Federal Reserve provided more bailout for the Euro, Martin Wolf has called for the same thing; more European integration.
Wolf states
[source : Governments up the stakes in their fight with markets, FT 12/5/2010]
Wolf then scaremongers by addressing the return to national currencies, suggesting it would be a far too difficult, detailed and lengthy process. This could be true because it has taken decades to get where we are now.
But one thing Wolf does not address is this; THE PEOPLE DO NOT WANT EUROPEAN INTEGRATION.
When given the vote in a referendum on European integration the people have voted no, but then promises were made about how beautiful and stable and cute and cuddly the Eurozone would be, so that in a second vote the turkeys voted for Christmas.
NOW LOOK WHAT'S HAPPENED!!
THE EUROZONE AND THE TREATY OF LISBON ARE TWO MASSIVE FUCK-UPS...BAILED OUT WITH OUR MONEY!!
So why not just fuck the Euro, right off?
Just ditch the whole idea, and go back to national sovereignty?
We, the European people, don't want it.
We, the European people, don't need it.
It is Bilderberg/Goldman Sachs/JP Morgan Chase etc who want and need increasing European integration for their world government, and Munchau and Wolf and the rest are just scaremongering and using emotional blackmail.
Go back to national sovereignty, and lock Bilderberg, Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan Chase up with Josef Fritzl. We know who is behind all this bailout crap, and why they did it. Just grab 'em, try 'em and then bang 'em up...FOREVER!
Now, after the Federal Reserve provided more bailout for the Euro, Martin Wolf has called for the same thing; more European integration.
Wolf states
Now they [the Eurozone countries] confront big choices...The first and most fundamental is whether to go towards greater integration or towards disintegration. The answer has to be the former. Of course, it is possible to imagine a return to national currencies.
[source : Governments up the stakes in their fight with markets, FT 12/5/2010]
Wolf then scaremongers by addressing the return to national currencies, suggesting it would be a far too difficult, detailed and lengthy process. This could be true because it has taken decades to get where we are now.
But one thing Wolf does not address is this; THE PEOPLE DO NOT WANT EUROPEAN INTEGRATION.
When given the vote in a referendum on European integration the people have voted no, but then promises were made about how beautiful and stable and cute and cuddly the Eurozone would be, so that in a second vote the turkeys voted for Christmas.
NOW LOOK WHAT'S HAPPENED!!
THE EUROZONE AND THE TREATY OF LISBON ARE TWO MASSIVE FUCK-UPS...BAILED OUT WITH OUR MONEY!!
So why not just fuck the Euro, right off?
Just ditch the whole idea, and go back to national sovereignty?
We, the European people, don't want it.
We, the European people, don't need it.
It is Bilderberg/Goldman Sachs/JP Morgan Chase etc who want and need increasing European integration for their world government, and Munchau and Wolf and the rest are just scaremongering and using emotional blackmail.
Go back to national sovereignty, and lock Bilderberg, Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan Chase up with Josef Fritzl. We know who is behind all this bailout crap, and why they did it. Just grab 'em, try 'em and then bang 'em up...FOREVER!
OUR DAVE
Our Dave Cameron.
Who could doubt that he would become Prime Minister.
A quick look at his wiki says it all (wiki is good for getting a quick briefing on a subject or event).
Harman, due to Brown's resignation, is now Leader of the Opposition. WHAT ARE THE CHANCES!!
But Cameron's family have a much murkier history.
Cameron's great-great-grandfather Sir Ewen Cameron was head of HSBC. HSBC was the launderer of drug smuggling profits from China [source : Dope Inc].
Ewen Cameron also played a role in financing the Japanese at the behest of the Rothschilds in the Russo-Japanese War of 1904/5. This war had been manipulated by the British oligarchy to destabilise Russia and an attempt led by Jacob Schiff's gimp George Kennan to overthrow the Russian Monarchy was made shortly after. The Russian Monarchy was eventually overthrown in 1917 after Rasputin had been murdered by British agents so that his significant anti-war advice wold be absent following the assassination of Arch Duke Ferdinand by Freemasons after Freemasonry had condemned Ferdinand to death several years before. Russia then fell into the British-Freemasonic plot to destroy Europe, called WW1, to rebuild it in the form they wanted. So today we have the ever-growing EU, championed by even the FT!
Does our Dave really know who he really is? Already three Bilderbergers in the cabinet, Clarke, Hague and Osborne. There's talk of even Pantsdown returning. And with Bilderberg due to meet next month, who knows. Has there been a PM of the UK who is NOT a Bilderberger? This could be a coalition of the Bilderbergers.
Who could doubt that he would become Prime Minister.
A quick look at his wiki says it all (wiki is good for getting a quick briefing on a subject or event).
Cameron is a direct descendant of George I, George II, George III, and King William IV (great × 5 grandfather) and his mistress Dorothea Jordan (and thus fifth cousin, twice removed of Queen Elizabeth II)[nb 1] As an illegitimate descendant of William IV, Cameron is not in the line of succession to the British throne...In May 2009, tabloid newspaper The Sun published a discovery by amateur genealogist Tony Andrews that Labour politician Harriet Harman is related to David Cameron through her aunt's marriage to his great uncle.
Harman, due to Brown's resignation, is now Leader of the Opposition. WHAT ARE THE CHANCES!!
But Cameron's family have a much murkier history.
Cameron's great-great-grandfather Sir Ewen Cameron was head of HSBC. HSBC was the launderer of drug smuggling profits from China [source : Dope Inc].
Ewen Cameron also played a role in financing the Japanese at the behest of the Rothschilds in the Russo-Japanese War of 1904/5. This war had been manipulated by the British oligarchy to destabilise Russia and an attempt led by Jacob Schiff's gimp George Kennan to overthrow the Russian Monarchy was made shortly after. The Russian Monarchy was eventually overthrown in 1917 after Rasputin had been murdered by British agents so that his significant anti-war advice wold be absent following the assassination of Arch Duke Ferdinand by Freemasons after Freemasonry had condemned Ferdinand to death several years before. Russia then fell into the British-Freemasonic plot to destroy Europe, called WW1, to rebuild it in the form they wanted. So today we have the ever-growing EU, championed by even the FT!
Does our Dave really know who he really is? Already three Bilderbergers in the cabinet, Clarke, Hague and Osborne. There's talk of even Pantsdown returning. And with Bilderberg due to meet next month, who knows. Has there been a PM of the UK who is NOT a Bilderberger? This could be a coalition of the Bilderbergers.
Tuesday, May 11, 2010
HELLO TO JP MORGAN CHASE
Someone at J P Morgan Chase googled "Bilderberg 2010" and got my blog of that title, and then read a few more of my blogs on Bilderberg/JPMC.
I wonder who it was?
Could it have been that scumbag?
I wonder who it was?
Could it have been that scumbag?
THREE BLIND MAJOR POLITICAL PARTIES
The LibLabCon are major but blind because they will do very little, if anything, to relieve the banks of their power over us; the power to create money that does not exist out of nothing, and then use it for whatever purpose they see fit.
I read to day that David Icke thinks the NWO want a LibLab coalition to empower the EU. I'm not so sure about that, but can see where he is coming from, even though Icke did predict a few years ago that Cameron was the chosen one, purely on genetics.
But I think the NWO want a LibCon coalition, because the UK must reduce its deficit asap, and the Conservatives are prepared to slash faster and deeper than the others.
With the LibCons slashing the state, the IMF riots will occur here sooner and we get a stronger police state sooner. You can see this desire in the media, except for The Daily Mirror, which is doing its bit by praising Brown for falling on his sword.
On Europe, the LibDems love it. Cameron has expressed his scepticism, but has received very public warnings from Bilderberg and the Establishment to remain in Europe not to rock the boat. OK, he can rant against it, but must not do anything politically against it. After all, he is bloodline! And there is always Big Bilderberg Ken Clark to start a leadership contest (again) should Cameron get too Euro-sceptic...
Mandelson could have used the potential for a LibLab coalition to remove Brown anyway, whether that coalition materialises or not. Brown's done his jobs, signing the Treaty of Lisbon and light-touch regulation of The City. And Mandelson even had the cheek last year to suggest that he should work for the Conservatives, should they win! And why not... He could easily slither across the halls of Westminster to work his evil wherever his masters deem fit. He gets kicked out office twice for corruption, then gets a powerful job in the EU, then comes back and gets another top job as No.2 (but really No. 1) in the UK.
Aynyway, I predict that, whoever eventually becomes PM, the government will have won...again. Oh, and it will be business as usual in The City: Fuck you, Britain, we're alright! Ha ha!
I read to day that David Icke thinks the NWO want a LibLab coalition to empower the EU. I'm not so sure about that, but can see where he is coming from, even though Icke did predict a few years ago that Cameron was the chosen one, purely on genetics.
But I think the NWO want a LibCon coalition, because the UK must reduce its deficit asap, and the Conservatives are prepared to slash faster and deeper than the others.
With the LibCons slashing the state, the IMF riots will occur here sooner and we get a stronger police state sooner. You can see this desire in the media, except for The Daily Mirror, which is doing its bit by praising Brown for falling on his sword.
On Europe, the LibDems love it. Cameron has expressed his scepticism, but has received very public warnings from Bilderberg and the Establishment to remain in Europe not to rock the boat. OK, he can rant against it, but must not do anything politically against it. After all, he is bloodline! And there is always Big Bilderberg Ken Clark to start a leadership contest (again) should Cameron get too Euro-sceptic...
Mandelson could have used the potential for a LibLab coalition to remove Brown anyway, whether that coalition materialises or not. Brown's done his jobs, signing the Treaty of Lisbon and light-touch regulation of The City. And Mandelson even had the cheek last year to suggest that he should work for the Conservatives, should they win! And why not... He could easily slither across the halls of Westminster to work his evil wherever his masters deem fit. He gets kicked out office twice for corruption, then gets a powerful job in the EU, then comes back and gets another top job as No.2 (but really No. 1) in the UK.
Aynyway, I predict that, whoever eventually becomes PM, the government will have won...again. Oh, and it will be business as usual in The City: Fuck you, Britain, we're alright! Ha ha!
Sunday, May 09, 2010
THE NATWEST THREE
Remember them?
They were handed over to the USA for trial for, get this, alleged fraud (!!!) without any problems.
Now, imagine the USA after the next (ie an even newer Pearl Harbour) false-flag terror attack.
Rounding up not only American citizens, for any crime such as using your brain and seeing through the bullshit, but anyone in the world! For any crime the USA says that person committed!
The USA wouldn't have to present any evidence. All it would need to say is, "We suspect Mr X. Hand him over".
Perfect for those with a global agenda.
And, of course, Mr X could be me or David Icke or Paul Watson or anyone the Zionazis here in the UK or in the USA or anywhere see as a threat, and guess what'll happen.
Disappearance.
Down the memory hole.
Mr Who?, they'll reply. No one here by that name, Now get back to your drudgery, you worthless piece of shit. How dare you care and ask any questions of your infallable Zionazi world government!! He is now ex Mr X.
They were handed over to the USA for trial for, get this, alleged fraud (!!!) without any problems.
Now, imagine the USA after the next (ie an even newer Pearl Harbour) false-flag terror attack.
Rounding up not only American citizens, for any crime such as using your brain and seeing through the bullshit, but anyone in the world! For any crime the USA says that person committed!
The USA wouldn't have to present any evidence. All it would need to say is, "We suspect Mr X. Hand him over".
Perfect for those with a global agenda.
And, of course, Mr X could be me or David Icke or Paul Watson or anyone the Zionazis here in the UK or in the USA or anywhere see as a threat, and guess what'll happen.
Disappearance.
Down the memory hole.
Mr Who?, they'll reply. No one here by that name, Now get back to your drudgery, you worthless piece of shit. How dare you care and ask any questions of your infallable Zionazi world government!! He is now ex Mr X.
WHAT TO SHOUT AT BILDERBERG 2010
I HEREBY DECLARE THIS TO BE AN UNLAWFUL ASSEMBLY.
I ORDER THOSE HERE ASSEMBLED TO IMMEDIATELY DISPERSE.
YOU MUST LEAVE THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY.
THOSE TRAITORS REMAINING WILL BE DEALT WITH BY A VERY ANGRY MOB WHO YOU HAVE SHAFTED FOR DECADES TO GET YOUR FAILED WORLD GOVERNMENT.
I ORDER THOSE HERE ASSEMBLED TO IMMEDIATELY DISPERSE.
YOU MUST LEAVE THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY.
THOSE TRAITORS REMAINING WILL BE DEALT WITH BY A VERY ANGRY MOB WHO YOU HAVE SHAFTED FOR DECADES TO GET YOUR FAILED WORLD GOVERNMENT.
COULD VOLCANIC ASH STOP BILDERBERG
A few weeks ago significant volumes of European air space was closed to civilian air traffic due to the perceived threat from volcanic ash from Iceland. Today a different but still significant volume of European air space is closed due to the same threat, and one country named today is of great interest...SPAIN.
Portuguese, French, Swiss and Spanish civilian air traffic is grounded. How will Bilderbergers get to their world government love-in this year if air traffic over Spain is grounded before Bilderberg is due to meet in Spain this year?
Will they use military air transport?
Or will they not bother?
Or take land based public transport, such as the train, in which case they will expose themselves more than they would like?
Portuguese, French, Swiss and Spanish civilian air traffic is grounded. How will Bilderbergers get to their world government love-in this year if air traffic over Spain is grounded before Bilderberg is due to meet in Spain this year?
Will they use military air transport?
Or will they not bother?
Or take land based public transport, such as the train, in which case they will expose themselves more than they would like?
Saturday, May 08, 2010
HOW TO ENSLAVE YOURSELF UNDER A TYRANNICAL WORLD GOVERNMENT
The first thing to do is just listen, without critical thought, to the mainstream media, and believe without question what you see and hear from them.
This will then put you into a pre-determined state of emotion, probably fear, but at the very least into a state of tension.
This, of course, will then put you into the state of conciousness that the NWO wants.
Thus you will probably do what you do not really want to do, and that is enslave yourself, by voting for war, or for a police state to defeat the (police state-sponsorded) terrorists, or for more and more and more in-your-face surveillance.
For how else could they do it?
How could they get 6 billion people to enslave themselves to a world government without believing that it was good for them?
You have to question. All the time.
Who benefits?
How could they use me to benefit themselves?
Why would they use me to benefit themselves?
This will then put you into a pre-determined state of emotion, probably fear, but at the very least into a state of tension.
This, of course, will then put you into the state of conciousness that the NWO wants.
Thus you will probably do what you do not really want to do, and that is enslave yourself, by voting for war, or for a police state to defeat the (police state-sponsorded) terrorists, or for more and more and more in-your-face surveillance.
For how else could they do it?
How could they get 6 billion people to enslave themselves to a world government without believing that it was good for them?
You have to question. All the time.
Who benefits?
How could they use me to benefit themselves?
Why would they use me to benefit themselves?
Thursday, May 06, 2010
FOR THOSE WHO STILL HAVE NOT WORKED IT OUT YET
You may think I rant about Bilderberg, but here's what's happened and is happening now.
Greece is rioting because of the austerity measures being imposed upon its people after Bilderbergers in the Greece government (and it is less than a handful of bastards - do the research yourself) over a decade or so sold Greece into the hands of Goldman Sachs. This enabled Greece to pretend it had a different financial situation to that which it really had, so that when referenda were held in the EU to ratify the Treaty of Lisbo this massive destabilising discrepancy was hidden. But now that the Treaty of Lisbon is now active, thanks to Bilderberg Herr Gordon Braun, the true situation regarding Greek finanical affairs can be made public and emotional blackmail is now being applied to European leaders to the effect of, "hey, we've come so far to construct the EU, we can't let it fail at the first hurdle".
And who has been driving this bailout of Greece? Germany and IMF
And who runs Germany? Angela Merkel.
And is Merkel a Bilderberger? YES!
And the IMF stated last year it was going to run the global economy>
Who is the current head of the IMF?
Dominique Strauss-Kahn.
And is he a Bilderberger? Oh yes!
But that's not all. Goldman Sachs IS Bilderberg.
The heads of the US Federal Reserve are Bilderbergers.
But is the Federal Reserve actually part of the US Government executive? No! It is a privately owned cartel of banks, made up of banks owned by...
Rothschild
Rockefeller
Warburg
And who first created the derivatives, and is master of the derivatives market, that have driven Greece and soon Spain, Portugal, Ireland, Italy and even the UK into running to the IMF for help? JP Morgan Chase.
And who runs JP Morgan Chase? Rockefeller.
And who runs Bilderberg? Rockefeller.
And did Herr Gordon Braun attend Bilderberg? Yes!
And did he encourage the City to a gambling with light touch regulation? Yes!
And has he sinced called for world government? YES!
So to recap;
1. the instruments causing the current crisis were instigated by JP Morgan Chase,
2. but another Bilderberg bank, Goldman Sachs, has specialised in fucking Europe via these instruments
3. however these instruments are now driving Europe into running to the IMF for help
4. but who is the biggest contributor to the IMF and thus has the biggest say? the US Federal Reserve
5. but hang on the...the US Federal Reserve is a private cartel, which is owned by JP Morgan Chase
6. thus the likes of Rockefeller via JPMC via the Federal Reserve via the IMF are secretly assuming control of the European economies after their Bilderberg gimp/bank Goldman Sachs has been busy speculating/gambling in derivatives in the EU
That's all folks!
Only life is not a cartoon...
Greece is rioting because of the austerity measures being imposed upon its people after Bilderbergers in the Greece government (and it is less than a handful of bastards - do the research yourself) over a decade or so sold Greece into the hands of Goldman Sachs. This enabled Greece to pretend it had a different financial situation to that which it really had, so that when referenda were held in the EU to ratify the Treaty of Lisbo this massive destabilising discrepancy was hidden. But now that the Treaty of Lisbon is now active, thanks to Bilderberg Herr Gordon Braun, the true situation regarding Greek finanical affairs can be made public and emotional blackmail is now being applied to European leaders to the effect of, "hey, we've come so far to construct the EU, we can't let it fail at the first hurdle".
And who has been driving this bailout of Greece? Germany and IMF
And who runs Germany? Angela Merkel.
And is Merkel a Bilderberger? YES!
And the IMF stated last year it was going to run the global economy>
Who is the current head of the IMF?
Dominique Strauss-Kahn.
And is he a Bilderberger? Oh yes!
But that's not all. Goldman Sachs IS Bilderberg.
The heads of the US Federal Reserve are Bilderbergers.
But is the Federal Reserve actually part of the US Government executive? No! It is a privately owned cartel of banks, made up of banks owned by...
Rothschild
Rockefeller
Warburg
And who first created the derivatives, and is master of the derivatives market, that have driven Greece and soon Spain, Portugal, Ireland, Italy and even the UK into running to the IMF for help? JP Morgan Chase.
And who runs JP Morgan Chase? Rockefeller.
And who runs Bilderberg? Rockefeller.
And did Herr Gordon Braun attend Bilderberg? Yes!
And did he encourage the City to a gambling with light touch regulation? Yes!
And has he sinced called for world government? YES!
So to recap;
1. the instruments causing the current crisis were instigated by JP Morgan Chase,
2. but another Bilderberg bank, Goldman Sachs, has specialised in fucking Europe via these instruments
3. however these instruments are now driving Europe into running to the IMF for help
4. but who is the biggest contributor to the IMF and thus has the biggest say? the US Federal Reserve
5. but hang on the...the US Federal Reserve is a private cartel, which is owned by JP Morgan Chase
6. thus the likes of Rockefeller via JPMC via the Federal Reserve via the IMF are secretly assuming control of the European economies after their Bilderberg gimp/bank Goldman Sachs has been busy speculating/gambling in derivatives in the EU
That's all folks!
Only life is not a cartoon...
Wednesday, May 05, 2010
FT WANTS A CONSERVATIVE VICTORY
In its editorial the FT analyses the pros and cons of the three main parties, and lo and behold wants a Conservative victory, but with some reservations.
[source : The case for change in the UK, FT 3/5/2010]
According to the FT Labour are tired, have wasted money and destroyed public faith in politics, while the LibDems, as internationalist as they are, do not have the economic policies required.
The main concern the FT has about the current Conservative leadership is its anti-Europe policy, but Big Bilderberg Ken can replace Cameron if Cameron starts getting funny ideas about withdrawing from Europe. After all, that's possibly why the Polish government was wiped out in a plane crash...
And the FT loves Europe...
But the Conservative pledge to slash the deficit faster than the other two parties has convinced the FT that the country should vote Conservative tomorrow.
So Brown signed The Treaty of Lisbon (because the Tories would never do so) and encouraged the City to go gambling and cause the current financial crisis, so that Brown makes himself so unpopular, gets dumped even by The Guardian(!) so that the Conservatives can come in and slash the state in accordance with the Bilderberg Nazi plan, and provoke riots here in the UK so that some form of martial law and police state can be imposed.
NB we can't vote The City of London out, can we?
[source : The case for change in the UK, FT 3/5/2010]
According to the FT Labour are tired, have wasted money and destroyed public faith in politics, while the LibDems, as internationalist as they are, do not have the economic policies required.
The main concern the FT has about the current Conservative leadership is its anti-Europe policy, but Big Bilderberg Ken can replace Cameron if Cameron starts getting funny ideas about withdrawing from Europe. After all, that's possibly why the Polish government was wiped out in a plane crash...
And the FT loves Europe...
But the Conservative pledge to slash the deficit faster than the other two parties has convinced the FT that the country should vote Conservative tomorrow.
So Brown signed The Treaty of Lisbon (because the Tories would never do so) and encouraged the City to go gambling and cause the current financial crisis, so that Brown makes himself so unpopular, gets dumped even by The Guardian(!) so that the Conservatives can come in and slash the state in accordance with the Bilderberg Nazi plan, and provoke riots here in the UK so that some form of martial law and police state can be imposed.
NB we can't vote The City of London out, can we?
Tuesday, May 04, 2010
HOW COULD BP FUCK UP BIG TIME?
BP = Bilderberg Petroleum
Bilderberg's very own Goldman Sachs bets the day before that BP would fuck up...AND IT DID!
Now, while BP steals the headlines, and will do for weeks, possibly months, the bank bailouts and global takeover will proceed on page 17 instead of on the front page.
I just cannot understand how, if it was known that that particular oilfield was under such high pressure, that BP would tap it into without the necessary safety measures...unless the resulting ecoscare could be used to deflect attention from the main goal of Bilderberg Inc, the bailout of and global takeover by the banks.
Bilderberg's very own Goldman Sachs bets the day before that BP would fuck up...AND IT DID!
Now, while BP steals the headlines, and will do for weeks, possibly months, the bank bailouts and global takeover will proceed on page 17 instead of on the front page.
I just cannot understand how, if it was known that that particular oilfield was under such high pressure, that BP would tap it into without the necessary safety measures...unless the resulting ecoscare could be used to deflect attention from the main goal of Bilderberg Inc, the bailout of and global takeover by the banks.
Monday, May 03, 2010
FT USES GREECE CRISIS TO CALL FOR STRONGER EUROPEAN POLITICAL UNION
Just as I thought!
The FT via Wolfgang Munchau is calling for a stronger EU citing that the Greece crisis proves that monetary union does not necessarily implement by proxy political union.
[source : Europe’s choice is to integrate or disintegrate, FT 2/5/2010]
So why would the flagship media outlet of the City of London, OUR LONDON, print such bullshit, calling for a stronger organisation than the City itself? This after the top dude of the ECB calls for global government by the banks?!
Because they financed Hitler and Stalin to destroy Europe so that their agents could rebuild Europe as they wanted, into a single EU via the ACUE, which will eventually be sacrificed to their one world government, which I still predict will be after a major war caused via Iran because their softly softly approach has been rumbled big time, MUCH MORE THAN THEY REALISE!
This is it peoples!
They're going for it!
To the death!
After all they've done to you, me, and our fathers and grandfathers sending them into engineered wars...
The softly softly approach for world government has failed.
The FT via Wolfgang Munchau is calling for a stronger EU citing that the Greece crisis proves that monetary union does not necessarily implement by proxy political union.
[source : Europe’s choice is to integrate or disintegrate, FT 2/5/2010]
So why would the flagship media outlet of the City of London, OUR LONDON, print such bullshit, calling for a stronger organisation than the City itself? This after the top dude of the ECB calls for global government by the banks?!
Because they financed Hitler and Stalin to destroy Europe so that their agents could rebuild Europe as they wanted, into a single EU via the ACUE, which will eventually be sacrificed to their one world government, which I still predict will be after a major war caused via Iran because their softly softly approach has been rumbled big time, MUCH MORE THAN THEY REALISE!
This is it peoples!
They're going for it!
To the death!
After all they've done to you, me, and our fathers and grandfathers sending them into engineered wars...
The softly softly approach for world government has failed.
BILDERBERG PIGS
PIGS is the acronym given to the sacrificial goats members of the EU reported to be in grave economic crisis, with their national debts suggesting that they are down and out.
P = Portugal
I = Italy
G = Greece
S = Spain
OK. Last year, after less than a handful of Greeks in high office had worked hand in glove with Bilderberg to betray Greece into the hands of Goldman Sachs i.e. Bilderberg, Bilderberg met just outside of Athens. Now Greece is on life support, just being bailed out by the IMF and the EU, this after it was openly announced that the IMF was going to control the whole global economy.
Now, it was recently announed that this year Bilderberg will meet in Spain...another member of PIGS.
Bilderberg is very frequently represented by the Spanish monarchy and the hierarchy of Banco Santander.
So will Spain be the next to experience that of Greece, to see riots and join the IMF life-support machine, so that IMF gradually assumesa more and more control of the EU having already controlled Africa and much of the 3rd world for decades The EU is considered rich as compared to the 3rd world. So how does the IMF get to control the EU? Bankrupt it via derivatives and Goldman Sachs and Bilderberg.
BUT HOW ARE THE BILDERBERG BANKS PROFITING FROM THIS?
P = Portugal
I = Italy
G = Greece
S = Spain
OK. Last year, after less than a handful of Greeks in high office had worked hand in glove with Bilderberg to betray Greece into the hands of Goldman Sachs i.e. Bilderberg, Bilderberg met just outside of Athens. Now Greece is on life support, just being bailed out by the IMF and the EU, this after it was openly announced that the IMF was going to control the whole global economy.
Now, it was recently announed that this year Bilderberg will meet in Spain...another member of PIGS.
Bilderberg is very frequently represented by the Spanish monarchy and the hierarchy of Banco Santander.
So will Spain be the next to experience that of Greece, to see riots and join the IMF life-support machine, so that IMF gradually assumesa more and more control of the EU having already controlled Africa and much of the 3rd world for decades The EU is considered rich as compared to the 3rd world. So how does the IMF get to control the EU? Bankrupt it via derivatives and Goldman Sachs and Bilderberg.
BUT HOW ARE THE BILDERBERG BANKS PROFITING FROM THIS?
WHY DOES WIKIPEDIA PAGE ON BILDERBERG NOT MENTION GREECE?
Here are the countries listed on the Wiki page as sending traitors reps to Bilderberg.
From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Bilderberg_participants
* 2.1 United States
o 2.1.1 Presidents
o 2.1.2 Senators
o 2.1.3 Governors
* 2.2 United Kingdom
o 2.2.1 Prime Ministers
* 2.3 Belgium
* 2.4 Netherlands
* 2.5 France
* 2.6 Portugal
* 2.7 Finland
* 2.8 Iceland
* 2.9 Germany
* 2.10 Poland
* 2.11 Canada
* 2.12 Sweden
* 2.13 EU Commissioners
* 2.14 UN, WTO, NATO and other International Organizations
But no Greece!
Yet with some brief research you will find that Greece has been represented at Bilderberg by a handful of the sametraitors people, who have been attending for decades!
I'll leave you to find out who they were, but here's a clue; they're in very high office right now, this very minute, having decided how to finance Greece for years, and now deciding how to handle the crisis that they themselves created.
From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Bilderberg_participants
* 2.1 United States
o 2.1.1 Presidents
o 2.1.2 Senators
o 2.1.3 Governors
* 2.2 United Kingdom
o 2.2.1 Prime Ministers
* 2.3 Belgium
* 2.4 Netherlands
* 2.5 France
* 2.6 Portugal
* 2.7 Finland
* 2.8 Iceland
* 2.9 Germany
* 2.10 Poland
* 2.11 Canada
* 2.12 Sweden
* 2.13 EU Commissioners
* 2.14 UN, WTO, NATO and other International Organizations
But no Greece!
Yet with some brief research you will find that Greece has been represented at Bilderberg by a handful of the same
I'll leave you to find out who they were, but here's a clue; they're in very high office right now, this very minute, having decided how to finance Greece for years, and now deciding how to handle the crisis that they themselves created.
Saturday, May 01, 2010
RUSSIA
I recently listened to an interview by Alex Jones of Jesse Ventura in which Ventura mentioned The Secret Team, proposed by Fletcher Prouty. The Secret Team fitted very very well into the Three World War plan, by splitting humanity for decades while reaping a massive profit from the military campaigns and resulting police states.
Having raised the question of Russia Today not covering Hollie Greig, and the Larouche media outlets reporting on Russia's flirtation with the British banking system while being advised by a British-allied economist, I am having serious second thoughts about Russia.
When Litvenenko was murdered I was suspicious of allegations against Russia because how could Russia have killed a MI6 agent in London with such a posion? I did think that maybe the British were actually involved somehow, by perhaps even allowing the Russians to kill Litvinenko. But why? Perhaps Litvinenko, as morally motivated as he was, was about to come into possession of some incriminating evidence against Putin, evidence that would reveal Putin's real alliance. After all, Putin's rise from political obscurity to national leadership was rapid and surprising, and there was some very suspicious occurences that supported his meteoric rise, such as the appartment bombings and the hexagen.
But then the Georgian invasion of South Ossetia occured in 2008. We all know tie-muncher started it...but why did he start it? Was it so that, unbeknownst to him, Putin could be the cavalry and portray himself and thus Medvedev to the Russian people as great Russian leaders?
If so, why are they flirting with known British agents and their banking system in the Caribbean while being demonised by that same state, while ignoring a 100% bona fide case of a sick paedophile ring that leads all the way to the highest echeolons of that state?
And then a train is blown up just across the road from the FSB HQ after alleged Ingushetian forces apparently murdered four villagers in cold blood!
I am seriously re-evaluating Russia.
Yeah, Russia can protest and complain about Afghan opium etc.
But there is one way for Russia to show its true credentials, after trying to expose 9/11 (albeit to the converted), and that is to expose the paedophile ring that has abused Hollie Greig and many other children. There is great anger at this, and it is growing.
The Secret Team may still be in control. It may be following the three world war plan by supplying, from one side, Iran with nuclear power plants so that the Zionazis, on the other side, have a reason to bomb Iran, so that Russia can come in as the cavalry again, only this time the war really does go global!
I don't know.
I'm gonna fink.
Having raised the question of Russia Today not covering Hollie Greig, and the Larouche media outlets reporting on Russia's flirtation with the British banking system while being advised by a British-allied economist, I am having serious second thoughts about Russia.
When Litvenenko was murdered I was suspicious of allegations against Russia because how could Russia have killed a MI6 agent in London with such a posion? I did think that maybe the British were actually involved somehow, by perhaps even allowing the Russians to kill Litvinenko. But why? Perhaps Litvinenko, as morally motivated as he was, was about to come into possession of some incriminating evidence against Putin, evidence that would reveal Putin's real alliance. After all, Putin's rise from political obscurity to national leadership was rapid and surprising, and there was some very suspicious occurences that supported his meteoric rise, such as the appartment bombings and the hexagen.
But then the Georgian invasion of South Ossetia occured in 2008. We all know tie-muncher started it...but why did he start it? Was it so that, unbeknownst to him, Putin could be the cavalry and portray himself and thus Medvedev to the Russian people as great Russian leaders?
If so, why are they flirting with known British agents and their banking system in the Caribbean while being demonised by that same state, while ignoring a 100% bona fide case of a sick paedophile ring that leads all the way to the highest echeolons of that state?
And then a train is blown up just across the road from the FSB HQ after alleged Ingushetian forces apparently murdered four villagers in cold blood!
I am seriously re-evaluating Russia.
Yeah, Russia can protest and complain about Afghan opium etc.
But there is one way for Russia to show its true credentials, after trying to expose 9/11 (albeit to the converted), and that is to expose the paedophile ring that has abused Hollie Greig and many other children. There is great anger at this, and it is growing.
The Secret Team may still be in control. It may be following the three world war plan by supplying, from one side, Iran with nuclear power plants so that the Zionazis, on the other side, have a reason to bomb Iran, so that Russia can come in as the cavalry again, only this time the war really does go global!
I don't know.
I'm gonna fink.
THE HAPPY HOUSE
We associate black and white squares with Freemasonry.
I associate Freemasonry with creating a false reality while their Illumaniti plan for world government is implemented.
This video of Siouxsie And The Banshees playing The Happy House succinctly and artistically contains the two ideas; the music is irregular and the forced happiness of the screenplay is acted out on a black and white background.
Siouxsie And The Banshees - Happy House
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HeBMHnJqAvM
I associate Freemasonry with creating a false reality while their Illumaniti plan for world government is implemented.
This video of Siouxsie And The Banshees playing The Happy House succinctly and artistically contains the two ideas; the music is irregular and the forced happiness of the screenplay is acted out on a black and white background.
Siouxsie And The Banshees - Happy House
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HeBMHnJqAvM
1782
The American Revolution, or The War of Independence, officially began in 1776.
This is 6 years before 1782.
In 1781 Cornwallis surrendered at Yorktown, effectively surrendering the British military campaign.
In 1782 at the Congress of Wilhelmsbad the highest ranks of Freemasonry surrendered to the Illuminati and allied with them and their evil satanic campaign to control the world, through whatever means necessary, including murder and blackmail.
In 1791 the following plan for Washington DC was proposed. NB the most Satanic symbol of all, the irregular, inverted and incomplete pentagram, pointing directly down into the White House.
So if any Senators or Representatives or State politicians or policemen or military or civilian is scratching their heads asking themselves, how the fuck did the USA become so evil? It's there in the streets of DC, dudes, all along...IN YOUR FACE!
IT WAS ALL PLANNED CENTURIES AGO!
Your founding fathers cleared America of Native American Indians so you could import Africans for slavery to build America for you so that a bunch of British-allied Jews could eventually immigrate and fuck you for every cent, and send you in to world wars in the name of 'freedom', and then get you to finance the most oppressive police state on the planet; the freedom-lovin' good ol' US of A!
How else could America become what it is today without the Fathers being led to believe they were doing God's (whoever he is) work only for the scheming Satanists to come along and eventually reveal their real agenda? Look what happened to W and Iraq!
Enjoy, suckers!
This is 6 years before 1782.
In 1781 Cornwallis surrendered at Yorktown, effectively surrendering the British military campaign.
In 1782 at the Congress of Wilhelmsbad the highest ranks of Freemasonry surrendered to the Illuminati and allied with them and their evil satanic campaign to control the world, through whatever means necessary, including murder and blackmail.
In 1791 the following plan for Washington DC was proposed. NB the most Satanic symbol of all, the irregular, inverted and incomplete pentagram, pointing directly down into the White House.
So if any Senators or Representatives or State politicians or policemen or military or civilian is scratching their heads asking themselves, how the fuck did the USA become so evil? It's there in the streets of DC, dudes, all along...IN YOUR FACE!
IT WAS ALL PLANNED CENTURIES AGO!
Your founding fathers cleared America of Native American Indians so you could import Africans for slavery to build America for you so that a bunch of British-allied Jews could eventually immigrate and fuck you for every cent, and send you in to world wars in the name of 'freedom', and then get you to finance the most oppressive police state on the planet; the freedom-lovin' good ol' US of A!
How else could America become what it is today without the Fathers being led to believe they were doing God's (whoever he is) work only for the scheming Satanists to come along and eventually reveal their real agenda? Look what happened to W and Iraq!
Enjoy, suckers!
MARVIN GAYE : MAY GOD REST HIS SOULFUL SOUL
Probably a bit cheezy..but WTF!
Marvin Gaye "What's Going On / What's Happening Brother"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y9KC7uhMY9s
"Got to give it up"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mdEjIjG4-Ts&feature=related
Marvin Gaye "What's Going On / What's Happening Brother"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y9KC7uhMY9s
"Got to give it up"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mdEjIjG4-Ts&feature=related
GREENSPAN ADVISED PAULSON & CO
Looking back on some of my posts over the years I came across this from October 2008.
Paulson & Co, named in the SEC complaint against Goldman Sachs, was advised by Greenspan's Greenspan Associates LLC.
It was, of course, Greenspan who masterminded the housing bubble that financed the derivatives that caused the current financial crisis...for which Greenspan was knighted!
You may not be surprised that Deutsche Bank has also done very very well out of the crisis, reporting record profits for them under superBilderberger Josef Ackermann.
===============================
WHO HAS GREENSPAN ADVISED AND HOW HAVE THEY DONE?
Sir Alan Greenspan expressed his shock and disbelief at the financial crisis he engineered while Chairman of the Board of The Federal Reserve.
Greenspan has his own consultancy, Greenspan Associates LLC (whose website is not that easy to find, if it exists at all).
One of his clients is Deutsche Bank, which has Josef Ackerman as its Chairman of the Board.
Greenspan and Ackerman were regularly at Bilderberg.
As far as I know Deutsche Bank is not in any financial trouble, and far less than most banks, and advised Brown and Darling to bail out the banks.
Another of Greenspan's clients is the hedge fund Paulson & Co., which apparently has done exceptionally well out of the housing bubble.
And yet another of Greenspan's clients has been H M Treasury!!
That's a nice little web that Greenspan weaved.
Paulson & Co, named in the SEC complaint against Goldman Sachs, was advised by Greenspan's Greenspan Associates LLC.
It was, of course, Greenspan who masterminded the housing bubble that financed the derivatives that caused the current financial crisis...for which Greenspan was knighted!
You may not be surprised that Deutsche Bank has also done very very well out of the crisis, reporting record profits for them under superBilderberger Josef Ackermann.
===============================
WHO HAS GREENSPAN ADVISED AND HOW HAVE THEY DONE?
Sir Alan Greenspan expressed his shock and disbelief at the financial crisis he engineered while Chairman of the Board of The Federal Reserve.
Greenspan has his own consultancy, Greenspan Associates LLC (whose website is not that easy to find, if it exists at all).
One of his clients is Deutsche Bank, which has Josef Ackerman as its Chairman of the Board.
Greenspan and Ackerman were regularly at Bilderberg.
As far as I know Deutsche Bank is not in any financial trouble, and far less than most banks, and advised Brown and Darling to bail out the banks.
Another of Greenspan's clients is the hedge fund Paulson & Co., which apparently has done exceptionally well out of the housing bubble.
And yet another of Greenspan's clients has been H M Treasury!!
That's a nice little web that Greenspan weaved.
BEFORE AND AFTER 11TH SEPTEMBER 2001
Before 9/11, the Taliban had almost eradicated the Afghan opium crop.
After 9/11, with the Taliban gone, the Afghan opium crop was reaching record harvests within a few years.
And now American soldiers are openly admitting to CNN that they logistically support the operation to bring the opium to market!?
WTF!!
But the opium was just one purpose of 9/11. The bloodlines wanted their drugs back, to drug Europe, Iran, Russia and China.
But if Iran, Russia and China know this, and they do, what can they do?
What would happen if they bombed the opium fields, or there was an arrest of some smugglers, and at least one US or UK soldier was killed? Can you imagine the outrage?
It would be exactly like The Lusitania, but instead of US civilians being used as human shields on The Lusitania we would have US and/or UK soldiers being used as human shields.
Is this why the BNP are being demonised due to their calls for bringing the troops back?
After 9/11, with the Taliban gone, the Afghan opium crop was reaching record harvests within a few years.
And now American soldiers are openly admitting to CNN that they logistically support the operation to bring the opium to market!?
WTF!!
But the opium was just one purpose of 9/11. The bloodlines wanted their drugs back, to drug Europe, Iran, Russia and China.
But if Iran, Russia and China know this, and they do, what can they do?
What would happen if they bombed the opium fields, or there was an arrest of some smugglers, and at least one US or UK soldier was killed? Can you imagine the outrage?
It would be exactly like The Lusitania, but instead of US civilians being used as human shields on The Lusitania we would have US and/or UK soldiers being used as human shields.
Is this why the BNP are being demonised due to their calls for bringing the troops back?
WILL BENJAMIN NUTTER-NYAHU BOMB BOMB BOMB IRAN?
Possibly. I believe he is nutty enough to do so.
That's why there has been a large campaign to replace Olmert with Nutter-nyahu via numerous accusations and allegations and against Olmert, which in general have so far been proved false (besides very very minor allegations).
Remember, on 9/11 it was Nutter-nyahu who was very thankful for nearly 3000 people dying at the WTC because, in his words, it would generate sympathy for Israel (and its A Clean Break agenda which since 9/11 has been satisfied to a large extent).
Nutter-nyahu is indeed a nutter, a Zionutter.
But if he does trigger WW3 then it was all planned well over two centuries ago, and every major global event since 1782 and the Congress of Wilhelmsbad has been engineered to bring us to this situation.
==============================================
From http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2010/3717netanyahu_wwiii.html
Will Netanyahu Trigger
London's World War III?
by Jeffrey Steinberg
April 26—Despite the best efforts of some leading U.S. government officials to both threaten and cajole Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu into firmly pledging that Israel will not launch a preventive military strike on Iran, there is no guarantee whatsoever that Israel will submit to that pressure. In fact, for reasons that will be presented below, the likelihood of just such an Israeli attack on Iran is increasing by the day. In the words of American statesman Lyndon LaRouche, "The present Netanyahu government in Israel is more dangerous than Iran. This Israeli government could start World War III."
The fact is that an Israeli "breakaway ally" attack on Iran would bring Israel, itself, one step closer to extinction. There is no legitimate Israeli national security interest served by any such strikes on Iran. Israel's own inflated claims about Iran being one year away from a deployable nuclear weapon are not even taken seriously within the Israeli military establishment, a reality implicitly acknowledged by Defense Minister Ehud Barak in an April 19 interview with Ha'aretz.
"Right now, Iran does not pose an existential threat to Israel," Barak admitted. "If Iran becomes nuclear, it will spark an arms race in the Middle East. This region is very sensitive because of the oil flow. The region is important to the entire world. The fact that Iran is not an immediate threat, but could evolve into one, means that we can't let ourselves fall asleep," Barak explained.
U.S. intelligence estimates are that, if Iran is, in fact, pursuing a nuclear weapons capability, it is, under the best case, at least two to five years away from a deployable bomb. At a recent U.S. Senate Armed Services Committee hearing, top officials from the Defense Intelligence Agency and the Joint Chiefs of Staff delivered a precise message to that effect, and committee chairman Carl Levin (D-Mich.) warned reporters in the audience against mis-reporting those estimates, in favor of scare stories about Iran's imminent atomic bomb breakout. Several days later, Undersecretary of Defense for Policy Michele Flournoy told reporters in Singapore that U.S. military action against Iran "is not on the table in the near term."
Serious Flaws in Iran's Nuclear Program
Senior U.S. intelligence sources, furthermore, have told EIR that Western security services, including the CIA, have received significant new operational intelligence on Iran, from recent defectors, including Iranian scientists directly involved in its nuclear programs. These sources report on serious flaws in the Iranian nuclear work, and on successful sabotage operations, that have further disrupted the program. As the result of this new flow of intelligence, the long-expected National Intelligence Estimate on Iran's nuclear program has been delayed until August, at the earliest.
Why, then, does the cloud of war hang over the Persian Gulf, and the extended Southwest Asia region, at this moment? Diplomats and journalists from Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, and Kuwait have confirmed that top officials from all of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) states are bracing for a war before Autumn.
According to the sources, Saudi Arabia is pressing for early completion of a new hospital complex in Bahrain, in expectation of heavy casualties, in the likely event of an Israeli strike upon Iran, and a harsh Iranian asymmetric retaliation. And, in anticipation of the shutdown of the Strait of Hormuz, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates have been speeding ahead with the construction of oil pipelines to bypass that choke point. Saudi Arabia has also accelerated work on three oil ports on its Red Sea coast, as another means of bypassing the Hormuz Strait.
While Iranian-linked organizations, like Hamas and Hezbollah, would be expected to conduct attacks on Israeli targets, in retaliation for an Israeli strike on Iran, the more certain reality is that Iran's own, direct asymmetric warfare capabilities, long developed by the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corp's al-Quds Brigade, would be unleashed against Iran's Persian Gulf neighbors, including the oil fields of the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia, and other Gulf states like Bahrain and Kuwait, which have large Shi'ite populations. And, while Gen. Ray Odierno, commander of U.S. forces in Iraq, has confirmed plans to draw down the American troop strength to 50,000 by the end of August, both Iraq and Afghanistan remain prime targets for Iranian retaliation against U.S. military personnel and contractors, should there be an Israeli strike.
In a recent report, prepared for a Swedish defense think tank, retired U.S. Air Force strategic planner, Col. Sam Gardiner, presented a detailed analysis of how an Israeli attack on Iran would almost certainly draw the United States into a war to "finish the job" provoked by the Israeli action—whether or not it was cleared in advance in Washington.
The nightmare triggered by an Israeli hit on Iran would extend far beyond the borders of the Persian Gulf. The most conservative estimates, presented at an April 22 Capitol Hill seminar, sponsored by the Middle East Policy Council, are that any military confrontation in the Gulf would instantly shoot up oil prices to above $200 per barrel. Under the present conditions of global financial collapse and economic breakdown, even a short-lived oil price spike would mean global chaos. A prolonged cutback in oil flows would have devastating consequences for China and other Asia-Pacific nations that are heavily dependent on the Persian Gulf.
Look to London
It is precisely for that reason that some factions within the City of London financial oligarchy are contemplating war. For these circles, facing a loss of their global political power through the imminent final disintegration of their post-Bretton Woods floating-exchange-rate system, a global conflagration, triggered by an Israeli strike on Iran, would unleash a new dark age, like that which overtook Western Europe during the 14th Century.
It is their deluded belief that, under circumstances of a global asymmetric permanent war, their political survival would be assured. The nation-state system, which they detest, would be destroyed by such a perpetual conflict, beginning with the demise of the United States—a demise virtually guaranteed by the continued presence of London's own asset, President Barack Obama, in the Oval Office. Under conditions of an Israeli military strike against Iran, Obama would, in Britain's estimate, order American military support to "finish the job," drawing the United States into yet another British-engineered war in Asia.
LaRouche has warned that the very British oligarchy that owns President Obama, and helped engineer his election, could very well move to assassinate him, particularly once he drew the United States into such a perpetual war in the Persian Gulf.
The faction in London that is contemplating this madness is long on record in favor of a radical reduction in world population, from the present 6.8 billion people to under 2 billion, in the span of one or two generations. They are followers of the late Lord Bertrand Russell, who called for the launching of preemptive nuclear strikes against the Soviet Union in 1946, and who wrote, in his infamous 1953 book, The Impact of Science on Society, that scientists should develop biological weapons that could cause a Black Death once in every generation, so that "high-minded people" could freely procreate without causing an overall increase in population.
The descendants of Russell, today, are the leading advocates of an Israeli preemptive strike against Iran. And through the historical British control over the Sykes-Picot-dominated region, they have the ability to deploy their Jabotinskyite asset, Benjamin Netanyahu, to spark World War III, on a moment's notice. The bogus idea that Iran is months away from a deployable nuclear bomb is the pretext for such a war. But, it is not the true cause.
The true cause is that a London faction, which sees itself as the heirs of the Venetian bankers who provoked the 14th Century New Dark Age, are contemplating the same thing today.
Bernard Lewis
One of the most important British propagandists for such an Israel-triggered global war is Dr. Bernard Lewis, the British intelligence operative who was deployed to the United States in the mid-1970s to engineer a new Thirty Years War along the entire southern tier of the Soviet Union, using Trilateral Commission head and National Security Advisor to President Jimmy Carter, Zbigniew Brzezinski, as his chief asset.
In an Aug. 8, 2006 Wall Street Journal op-ed, Lewis argued that the Cold War-era doctrine of Mutually Assured Destruction—MAD—would not work with Iran, because the Iranian leadership were messianic cultists, who believed that an attack on Israel with nuclear weapons would bring about the return of the 12th Imam, and the End Times, in which all true Muslims would ascend to Heaven and all non-believers would burn in Hell.
"In this context," Lewis wrote, "mutual assured destruction, the deterrent that worked so well during the Cold War, would have no meaning. At the end of time, there will be general destruction anyway. What will matter will be the final destination of the dead—hell for the infidels, and heaven for the believers. For people with this mindset, MAD is not a constraint; it is an inducement."
Lewis's wacky argument was revived in an interview published today in the Jerusalem Post, by one of his leading U.S. Pentagon protégés, Harold Rhode. Rhode, just retired from a long career in the Pentagon's Office of Net Assessments, where he was an instrumental player in the Tony Blair/Dick Cheney U.S. invasion of Iraq. Asked, point blank, if the United States could contain an Iran with a proven nuclear weapon capability, Rhode said, "The people running the country are the crazies and they believe that if they can bring about a conflagration that will bring them the mahdi.... Again, I'm not privy to information about what Israel or America knows about how close or how far [Iran is from possessing a nuclear weapon], but there has been one Holocaust. That's enough, and I would hope that the leaders of this country, Israel, understand, and I'm sure they do understand that there should not be another Holocaust. This is their job, they were elected to make this happen."
Blair's Post-Westphalian World
On April 22, 2009, former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, the architect of the Iraq War, who enjoys a close personal relationship with President Obama, traveled to Chicago to deliver a tenth anniversary address before the Chicago Global Affairs Council. In April 1999, in the midst of the Kosovo War, Blair had spoken at the same venue, and presented a vision of a post-Westphalian world, in which national sovereignty no longer counted, and a doctrine of "humanitarian interventionism" was to replace the previous system of nation-states.
In his 2009 speech, Blair not only reiterated his deep commitment to the end of sovereignty. He issued a declaration of war against what he called "an extreme and misguided form of Islam."
My argument is that the case for the doctrine I advocated ten years ago, remains as strong now as it was then; and that what has really changed is the context in which the doctrine has to be applied.... The struggle faced by the world, including the majority of Muslims, is posed by an extreme and misguided form of Islam. Our job is simple: It is to support and partner those Muslims who believe deeply in Islam but also who believe in peaceful co-existence, in taking on and defeating the extremists who don't. But it can't be done without our active and wholehearted participation.
Blair singled out Iran, declaring "there are elements in the leadership of a major country, namely Iran, that can support and succour its [extremist Islam] practitioners." While supporting "engagement" with Iran, Blair stated, bluntly:
The purpose of such engagement should, however, be clear. It is to prevent Iran acquiring nuclear weapons capability; but it is more than that, it is to put a stop to the Iranian regime's policy of de-stabilisation and support of terrorism.
Blair went on to press the case for war, warning that,
In the use of hard power, we have to understand one very simple thing: where we are called upon to fight, we have to do it. If we are defeated anywhere, we are at risk of being defeated everywhere.
Blair's clarion call for perpetual war against Islam, starting with the targeting of Iran, has echoes inside the Obama White House, despite the best efforts of Defense Secretary Robert Gates, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, and others on the national security team, to avoid another unjustified war. In an article in today's Politico, former national security officials Flynt Leverett and Hillary Mann Leverett warned,
There is a serious risk that President Barack Obama may eventually be manuevered into ordering military strikes against Iranian nuclear targets.
The reality is, that a cadre of senior National Security Council officials—including Deputy National Security Adviser Tom Donilon and Dennis Ross, senior director for the central region (including Iran)—is resisting the adoption of containment as the administration's Iran strategy.... As Ross told us before he returned to government service in the Obama administration, President George W. Bush's successor would probably need to order military strikes against Iranian nuclear targets. Pursuing diplomatic initiatives early in Obama's tenure, Ross said, would be necessary to justify potential military action to domestic and international constituencies.
As far as they go, the Leveretts' warnings are correct. But they leave out the two most critical strategic factors: the London faction's true motives for detonating what could easily careen into a global asymmetric Third World War; and the Obama factor. President Obama is controlled by the very London circles typified by Tony Blair's "humanitarian interventionism" doctrine of permanent war/permanent chaos. What too few people care to admit or state publicly is that, so long as Obama remains in office, and Jabotinskyite Netanyahu remains in power in Israel, the threat of world war and a new 14th-Century Dark Age will hang, like a Sword of Damocles, over the planet.
That's why there has been a large campaign to replace Olmert with Nutter-nyahu via numerous accusations and allegations and against Olmert, which in general have so far been proved false (besides very very minor allegations).
Remember, on 9/11 it was Nutter-nyahu who was very thankful for nearly 3000 people dying at the WTC because, in his words, it would generate sympathy for Israel (and its A Clean Break agenda which since 9/11 has been satisfied to a large extent).
Nutter-nyahu is indeed a nutter, a Zionutter.
But if he does trigger WW3 then it was all planned well over two centuries ago, and every major global event since 1782 and the Congress of Wilhelmsbad has been engineered to bring us to this situation.
==============================================
From http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2010/3717netanyahu_wwiii.html
Will Netanyahu Trigger
London's World War III?
by Jeffrey Steinberg
April 26—Despite the best efforts of some leading U.S. government officials to both threaten and cajole Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu into firmly pledging that Israel will not launch a preventive military strike on Iran, there is no guarantee whatsoever that Israel will submit to that pressure. In fact, for reasons that will be presented below, the likelihood of just such an Israeli attack on Iran is increasing by the day. In the words of American statesman Lyndon LaRouche, "The present Netanyahu government in Israel is more dangerous than Iran. This Israeli government could start World War III."
The fact is that an Israeli "breakaway ally" attack on Iran would bring Israel, itself, one step closer to extinction. There is no legitimate Israeli national security interest served by any such strikes on Iran. Israel's own inflated claims about Iran being one year away from a deployable nuclear weapon are not even taken seriously within the Israeli military establishment, a reality implicitly acknowledged by Defense Minister Ehud Barak in an April 19 interview with Ha'aretz.
"Right now, Iran does not pose an existential threat to Israel," Barak admitted. "If Iran becomes nuclear, it will spark an arms race in the Middle East. This region is very sensitive because of the oil flow. The region is important to the entire world. The fact that Iran is not an immediate threat, but could evolve into one, means that we can't let ourselves fall asleep," Barak explained.
U.S. intelligence estimates are that, if Iran is, in fact, pursuing a nuclear weapons capability, it is, under the best case, at least two to five years away from a deployable bomb. At a recent U.S. Senate Armed Services Committee hearing, top officials from the Defense Intelligence Agency and the Joint Chiefs of Staff delivered a precise message to that effect, and committee chairman Carl Levin (D-Mich.) warned reporters in the audience against mis-reporting those estimates, in favor of scare stories about Iran's imminent atomic bomb breakout. Several days later, Undersecretary of Defense for Policy Michele Flournoy told reporters in Singapore that U.S. military action against Iran "is not on the table in the near term."
Serious Flaws in Iran's Nuclear Program
Senior U.S. intelligence sources, furthermore, have told EIR that Western security services, including the CIA, have received significant new operational intelligence on Iran, from recent defectors, including Iranian scientists directly involved in its nuclear programs. These sources report on serious flaws in the Iranian nuclear work, and on successful sabotage operations, that have further disrupted the program. As the result of this new flow of intelligence, the long-expected National Intelligence Estimate on Iran's nuclear program has been delayed until August, at the earliest.
Why, then, does the cloud of war hang over the Persian Gulf, and the extended Southwest Asia region, at this moment? Diplomats and journalists from Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, and Kuwait have confirmed that top officials from all of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) states are bracing for a war before Autumn.
According to the sources, Saudi Arabia is pressing for early completion of a new hospital complex in Bahrain, in expectation of heavy casualties, in the likely event of an Israeli strike upon Iran, and a harsh Iranian asymmetric retaliation. And, in anticipation of the shutdown of the Strait of Hormuz, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates have been speeding ahead with the construction of oil pipelines to bypass that choke point. Saudi Arabia has also accelerated work on three oil ports on its Red Sea coast, as another means of bypassing the Hormuz Strait.
While Iranian-linked organizations, like Hamas and Hezbollah, would be expected to conduct attacks on Israeli targets, in retaliation for an Israeli strike on Iran, the more certain reality is that Iran's own, direct asymmetric warfare capabilities, long developed by the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corp's al-Quds Brigade, would be unleashed against Iran's Persian Gulf neighbors, including the oil fields of the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia, and other Gulf states like Bahrain and Kuwait, which have large Shi'ite populations. And, while Gen. Ray Odierno, commander of U.S. forces in Iraq, has confirmed plans to draw down the American troop strength to 50,000 by the end of August, both Iraq and Afghanistan remain prime targets for Iranian retaliation against U.S. military personnel and contractors, should there be an Israeli strike.
In a recent report, prepared for a Swedish defense think tank, retired U.S. Air Force strategic planner, Col. Sam Gardiner, presented a detailed analysis of how an Israeli attack on Iran would almost certainly draw the United States into a war to "finish the job" provoked by the Israeli action—whether or not it was cleared in advance in Washington.
The nightmare triggered by an Israeli hit on Iran would extend far beyond the borders of the Persian Gulf. The most conservative estimates, presented at an April 22 Capitol Hill seminar, sponsored by the Middle East Policy Council, are that any military confrontation in the Gulf would instantly shoot up oil prices to above $200 per barrel. Under the present conditions of global financial collapse and economic breakdown, even a short-lived oil price spike would mean global chaos. A prolonged cutback in oil flows would have devastating consequences for China and other Asia-Pacific nations that are heavily dependent on the Persian Gulf.
Look to London
It is precisely for that reason that some factions within the City of London financial oligarchy are contemplating war. For these circles, facing a loss of their global political power through the imminent final disintegration of their post-Bretton Woods floating-exchange-rate system, a global conflagration, triggered by an Israeli strike on Iran, would unleash a new dark age, like that which overtook Western Europe during the 14th Century.
It is their deluded belief that, under circumstances of a global asymmetric permanent war, their political survival would be assured. The nation-state system, which they detest, would be destroyed by such a perpetual conflict, beginning with the demise of the United States—a demise virtually guaranteed by the continued presence of London's own asset, President Barack Obama, in the Oval Office. Under conditions of an Israeli military strike against Iran, Obama would, in Britain's estimate, order American military support to "finish the job," drawing the United States into yet another British-engineered war in Asia.
LaRouche has warned that the very British oligarchy that owns President Obama, and helped engineer his election, could very well move to assassinate him, particularly once he drew the United States into such a perpetual war in the Persian Gulf.
The faction in London that is contemplating this madness is long on record in favor of a radical reduction in world population, from the present 6.8 billion people to under 2 billion, in the span of one or two generations. They are followers of the late Lord Bertrand Russell, who called for the launching of preemptive nuclear strikes against the Soviet Union in 1946, and who wrote, in his infamous 1953 book, The Impact of Science on Society, that scientists should develop biological weapons that could cause a Black Death once in every generation, so that "high-minded people" could freely procreate without causing an overall increase in population.
The descendants of Russell, today, are the leading advocates of an Israeli preemptive strike against Iran. And through the historical British control over the Sykes-Picot-dominated region, they have the ability to deploy their Jabotinskyite asset, Benjamin Netanyahu, to spark World War III, on a moment's notice. The bogus idea that Iran is months away from a deployable nuclear bomb is the pretext for such a war. But, it is not the true cause.
The true cause is that a London faction, which sees itself as the heirs of the Venetian bankers who provoked the 14th Century New Dark Age, are contemplating the same thing today.
Bernard Lewis
One of the most important British propagandists for such an Israel-triggered global war is Dr. Bernard Lewis, the British intelligence operative who was deployed to the United States in the mid-1970s to engineer a new Thirty Years War along the entire southern tier of the Soviet Union, using Trilateral Commission head and National Security Advisor to President Jimmy Carter, Zbigniew Brzezinski, as his chief asset.
In an Aug. 8, 2006 Wall Street Journal op-ed, Lewis argued that the Cold War-era doctrine of Mutually Assured Destruction—MAD—would not work with Iran, because the Iranian leadership were messianic cultists, who believed that an attack on Israel with nuclear weapons would bring about the return of the 12th Imam, and the End Times, in which all true Muslims would ascend to Heaven and all non-believers would burn in Hell.
"In this context," Lewis wrote, "mutual assured destruction, the deterrent that worked so well during the Cold War, would have no meaning. At the end of time, there will be general destruction anyway. What will matter will be the final destination of the dead—hell for the infidels, and heaven for the believers. For people with this mindset, MAD is not a constraint; it is an inducement."
Lewis's wacky argument was revived in an interview published today in the Jerusalem Post, by one of his leading U.S. Pentagon protégés, Harold Rhode. Rhode, just retired from a long career in the Pentagon's Office of Net Assessments, where he was an instrumental player in the Tony Blair/Dick Cheney U.S. invasion of Iraq. Asked, point blank, if the United States could contain an Iran with a proven nuclear weapon capability, Rhode said, "The people running the country are the crazies and they believe that if they can bring about a conflagration that will bring them the mahdi.... Again, I'm not privy to information about what Israel or America knows about how close or how far [Iran is from possessing a nuclear weapon], but there has been one Holocaust. That's enough, and I would hope that the leaders of this country, Israel, understand, and I'm sure they do understand that there should not be another Holocaust. This is their job, they were elected to make this happen."
Blair's Post-Westphalian World
On April 22, 2009, former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, the architect of the Iraq War, who enjoys a close personal relationship with President Obama, traveled to Chicago to deliver a tenth anniversary address before the Chicago Global Affairs Council. In April 1999, in the midst of the Kosovo War, Blair had spoken at the same venue, and presented a vision of a post-Westphalian world, in which national sovereignty no longer counted, and a doctrine of "humanitarian interventionism" was to replace the previous system of nation-states.
In his 2009 speech, Blair not only reiterated his deep commitment to the end of sovereignty. He issued a declaration of war against what he called "an extreme and misguided form of Islam."
My argument is that the case for the doctrine I advocated ten years ago, remains as strong now as it was then; and that what has really changed is the context in which the doctrine has to be applied.... The struggle faced by the world, including the majority of Muslims, is posed by an extreme and misguided form of Islam. Our job is simple: It is to support and partner those Muslims who believe deeply in Islam but also who believe in peaceful co-existence, in taking on and defeating the extremists who don't. But it can't be done without our active and wholehearted participation.
Blair singled out Iran, declaring "there are elements in the leadership of a major country, namely Iran, that can support and succour its [extremist Islam] practitioners." While supporting "engagement" with Iran, Blair stated, bluntly:
The purpose of such engagement should, however, be clear. It is to prevent Iran acquiring nuclear weapons capability; but it is more than that, it is to put a stop to the Iranian regime's policy of de-stabilisation and support of terrorism.
Blair went on to press the case for war, warning that,
In the use of hard power, we have to understand one very simple thing: where we are called upon to fight, we have to do it. If we are defeated anywhere, we are at risk of being defeated everywhere.
Blair's clarion call for perpetual war against Islam, starting with the targeting of Iran, has echoes inside the Obama White House, despite the best efforts of Defense Secretary Robert Gates, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, and others on the national security team, to avoid another unjustified war. In an article in today's Politico, former national security officials Flynt Leverett and Hillary Mann Leverett warned,
There is a serious risk that President Barack Obama may eventually be manuevered into ordering military strikes against Iranian nuclear targets.
The reality is, that a cadre of senior National Security Council officials—including Deputy National Security Adviser Tom Donilon and Dennis Ross, senior director for the central region (including Iran)—is resisting the adoption of containment as the administration's Iran strategy.... As Ross told us before he returned to government service in the Obama administration, President George W. Bush's successor would probably need to order military strikes against Iranian nuclear targets. Pursuing diplomatic initiatives early in Obama's tenure, Ross said, would be necessary to justify potential military action to domestic and international constituencies.
As far as they go, the Leveretts' warnings are correct. But they leave out the two most critical strategic factors: the London faction's true motives for detonating what could easily careen into a global asymmetric Third World War; and the Obama factor. President Obama is controlled by the very London circles typified by Tony Blair's "humanitarian interventionism" doctrine of permanent war/permanent chaos. What too few people care to admit or state publicly is that, so long as Obama remains in office, and Jabotinskyite Netanyahu remains in power in Israel, the threat of world war and a new 14th-Century Dark Age will hang, like a Sword of Damocles, over the planet.