Pages

Sunday, December 12, 2010

WIKILEAKS DOES LITVINENKO

There is a cable in the latest Wikileaks releases that raises some very grave and interesting questions.

Readers of this blog should by now be aware that I am deeply scpetical of Wikileaks and the way it is being used by the Mockingbird Media. Assange may be just a useful idiot (he believes 9/11 was run by a man in a cave on a dialysis machine) and unaware that our media is mockingbird. His relationship with The Guardian (which pushed the Green Nazi agenda at Copenhagen last year), The New York Times (pro-war and Bilderberg) and Der Spiegel (German Mockingbird and Gladio) does not show him in a good light, and implies that Assange is naive at best.

I do not know if Wikileaks released all the anti-Russia cables on the day before FIFA awarded the World Cup 2018, but it was intriguing to say the least that such cables regurgitating the usual smears were published on that day. But who does the leaking and who does the publishing? The Mockingbird Media does the publishing.

Which brings me onto this latest leak referring to the radioactive and photogenic death of Alexander Litvinenko in 2006.

In this latest leak it is claimed that
Russian authorities in London had known about and followed individuals moving radioactive substances into the city but were told by the British that they were under control before the poisoning took place.

[source : http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/us-embassy-cables-documents/90864?intcmp=239]

To me this implies that Russia knew who was smuggling the stuff, but it also implies that the British did too!

So if the British knew who the smugglers were then why have they not arrested the smugglers on suspicion of murder?

Yes, they claimed that Andrei Lugovoi was the killer, yet Lugovoi was photographed with his family just hours after he had allegedly poisoned Litvinenko by sprinkling Polonium-210 into some tea, thus risking the lives of his family. Lugovoi was also not a trained assassin, as far as we know, and definitely not in the skilled use of nuclear material as tools of assassination.

This claim may well be bogus and unsubstantiated, but the claim was definitely made, and in a diplomatic situation, and to a man with serious links directly into the heart of the US intelligence community and State Department, Henry Crumpton.

And the claim was made by Russian Special Presidential Representative Anatoliy Safonov.

You also have to recall all the many allegations that have been made against Putin and Russia.

Lugovoi was an ex-bodyguard meeting with Litvinenko on some business, and claims that British Intelligence tried to recruit him to dig up some dirt on Putin for Litvinenko. Lugovoi refused.

When Anna Politkovskaya was murdered, who in the Mockingbird Media was the prime suspect? Putin. Why? Because according to them she was murdered on his birthday and it was a birthday present. But now even the newspaper that Politkovskaya believes that Putin had nothing to do with her murder.

A recent allegation against Putin is that he has secretly divorced his wife and hooked up with a young and flexible female gymnast.

In the morning of August 8th 2008 shortly after the tie-munching Soros agent Saakashvili had bombed South Ossetian civilians to death while they slept in their beds, who did the Mockingbird Media blame? Russia.

The list of allegations is long, and generally false.

Russia is no saint, but when you have a New World Order in the Anglo-American-Venetian Establishment that we have, cheering on mock human sacrifices at the faggy Bohemian Grove, engineering world wars and holocausts, and trying to enslave the whole world after a drastic reduction in human population, then you can't afford to be a saint.

I can believe the allegation set forth in the aformentioned cable, that Russia was tracking a nuclear material smuggling operation into Great Britain, but was told by British authorities that it was "under control".

I am not saying I believe it to be the only possible explanation, but putting the assassination into the context of all the other allegations, I think it deserves some investigation, and immediately.

Who was tracking the smuggling operation, on both the British and Russian sides?

Who was being tracked?

Was Polonium-210 one of the nuclear materials of concern?

Who made the statement that it was "under control", how, when and to whom?

No comments:

Post a Comment