MY LETTER TO MY MP ABOUT THE USE OF BRITISH SPECIAL FORCES IN THE DRIVE TO WW3

I have just sent the following letter to my MP about the use of British Special Forces in the drive to WW3.

I request that if you want to know what is going on that you use this letter verbatim or amend it to your hearts desire and ask your MP too.

This insanity must stop immediately.

==============================================

I write to you as my MP to express my grave concerns that British Special Forces (BSF) are once again being used to foment a civil war. Last year allegations that BSF were involved with the Libyan rebels were laughed off as conspiracy theory. But only a few weeks ago the BBC showed that BSF were in there right from the start, guiding and advising the Libyan rebel army. UN SCR 1973 gave NATO the power to implement a No Fly Zone and protect civilians, but within days of UN SCR 1973 being adopted the assassination of Gaddafi was openly proposed in British media. Libyan civilians were instead bombed to death by NATO, and Gaddafi was eventually assassinated. But by whom? With it now publicly admitted that BSF were working with the hierarchy of the Libyan rebel army, is it possible that BSF assassinated Gaddafi? And why were we openly assisting the Libyan rebel army when they had clear links to al Qaeda?

I'll tell you why. Because what we are now seeing in North Africa and the Middle East is a Pentagon plan to go to war on seven nations in five years. We know about this plan because former NATO chief General Wesley Clark has told us. In his book entitled Winning Modern Wars, and in speeches at The Commonwealth Club of California and at the University of Alabama Clark related his experiences at The Pentagon shortly after 11th September 2001. Clark met a Pentagon planner who told him that first just Iraq was being targeted, and the rank and file at The Pentagon could not understand why (this when there was no evidence that Iraq was involved in 9/11). A week or so later six more nations were targets; Sudan, Somalia, Iran, Lebanon, Syria and Libya. So why were Iraq and Iran on the list? Both Iraq and Iran were named as targets in PNAC's Rebuilding America's Defenses published in 2000. Syria and Lebanon were also named in A Clean Break. It is more than curious that on 9/11 founding members of PNAC were in very, very, very influential positions, such as Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld (who had quietly been given the sole power to stand down the US military). PNAC had written in Rebuilding America's Defenses that they wanted "a new Pearl Harbor" to go on a global warmongering rampage to impose US hegemony. They got their “new Pearl Harbor”, perhaps with their inaction, on 9/11.

It is painfully obvious that the list of countries that General Clark named have seen some form of intrigue. Let’s look at Iraq and Lebanon.

We invaded Iraq because we were told Iraq had WMD and was involved in 9/11. Neither allegation was true.

In Lebanon Rafik Hariri was assassinated in 2005. The Special Tribunal for Lebanon accused Syria. Syria subsequently withdrew from Lebanon. But the STL now accuses Hezbollah. Hezbollah accuses Israel, after Hezbollah intercepted images from Israeli drones flying over Beirut closely following Hariri's movements shortly before his assassination. Israel bombed Lebanon back to the stone age in a war in 2006.

And last year the United Nations adopted UN SCR 1973 to stop Gaddafi killing his own citizens. We now know that NATO bombed many civilians to death and has installed a puppet government which is more ruthless than Gaddafi and has a distinct brand of Islamic extremism, torturing and killing whoever it wants, usually black Libyan civilians, without any criticism from us, but occasionally former Libyan government officials too.

The warmongering on Syria and Iran has been accelerating in the last year, and now Somalia is being linked with military intervention from the West following the London Conference on Somalia on 23rd February 2012.

The civil war that UN SCR 1973 was designed to stop was fomented with the assistance of BSF. That is now beyond question.

Reports in The Daily Star in January 2012 quote unnamed British security officials stating that BSF are now in Syria assisting the Syrian rebel army, and that in Syria "it is going to be like Libya, only bloodier".

Is this because of BSF?

Should BSF be used to help the Pentagon implement the PNAC plan of eventual war on Iran, a war that could very easily escalate into World War 3?

There have been recent reports of babies and children dying in Homs, and elsewhere in Syria. Is this the result of BSF stirring up trouble in Syria as part of this plan?

At a time of harsh austerity, caused by the reckless gambling of the banks, which the ordinary British taxpayer is suffering from through no fault of their own, should British taxpayer money be used to start civil wars in countries so that we can claim responsibility to protect (R2P) but then overthrow governments, and in the case of Libya hand them over to al Qaeda?

And should we ally with al Qaeda? Al Qaeda was at the vanguard of the Libyan rebels. Belhaj, the Libyan rebel commander and founder of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, was renditioned to Libya and is suing the British government. More recently Zawahiri requested that all Muslims should assist the overthrow of the Syrian government. This amid US intelligence reports that al Qaeda in Iraq is getting in on the action in Syria, committing terrorist atrocities against Syrian military and civilians alike, notably the car bomb attack in Aleppo.

The report published by the most recent observation team from the Arab League in Syria contained some startling revelations. They observed armed gangs who were supported from abroad committing terrorist attacks against a bus carrying civilians. Needless to say, this report was buried by the media because it raised the possibility of BSF in Syria helping al Qaeda to commit terrorist acts.

The current Arab uprisings, as well as that currently being attempted in Russia, were planned and implemented through various NGOs in the West, such as the National Endowment for Democracy, which receives its money from the US State Department. As a consequence of the Arab Uprising we have put Islamic extremists into power; Salafists, The Muslim Brotherhood and al Qaeda. Not bad going, eh?

We have a track record of allying with al Qaeda; Afghanistan, Yugoslavia, Libya. There are now credible reports that we are now allying with al Qaeda in Syria. But at the same time as allying with al Qaeda in Libya and Syria, the government of Somalia is asking us to bomb al Shabab, a.k.a. al Qaeda in Somalia!

What is going on?

William Hague and Phil Hammond must be made to make a statement in The House of Commons about the past and present use of BSF in the seven nations named by General Wesley Clark since 11th September 2001, and they must do so as soon as possible. A war over Syria will be completely different to the one over Libya, and could easily result in a world war with Russia. BSF must not be used to foment civil wars for The Pentagon and their masters, the international financial oligarchy of Wall Street and The City of London, who have just screwed us all into fascist austerity with their derivatives gambling. The removal of the current Syrian government would remove Iran’s only major ally in the region. A war with Iran will be even more horrific, and the overthrow of Assad in Syria will without question lead to war with Iran. It was demanded in Rebuilding America’s Defenses and in A Clean Break.