Stuff that Day stated would happen is
1. abortion would become normal
2. so would euthanasia (see latest news about The Liverpool Care Pathway in the UK and death panels in the USA)
3. sex not for reproduction, children produced in labs and only to those deemed worthy, and limited to 2 unless the parents were considered exceptional in which case they would be permitted more than 2 children
4. homosexuality promoted
5. the family unit destroyed
6. owning private property discouraged and in most cases unaffordable
7. education,
a. more time spent in schools but less learned
b. schools more of a community service
c. access to information strictly controlled
d. books would disappear
8. alcohol and drug abuse would be encouraged
9. medical aid restricted
Day mentioned much much more, like accepting the UN, falsified scientific research (and Icke pointed out the global man-made warming bollocks was exactly that), American heavy industry would be exported to destroy the USA but this would be presented as "saving the planet", and could have ranted on for hours more but was limited for time.
But regarding terrorism, apparently terror would occur in Europe, and only in the USA if the USA was not conforming to the plan.
Now this is of great interest to me because I am a strong believer in the plan for three world wars requiring the creation of Israel. It is possible that this plan has been Plan B and only implemented as a last resort due to the risk involved of actually losing a fight. However, Dunegan claimed,
Anyhow, the new system would be brought in, if not by peaceful cooperation -everybody willingly yielding national sovereignty- then by bringing the nation to the brink of nuclear war. And everybody would be so fearful as hysteria is created by the possibility of nuclear war that there would be a strong public outcry to negotiate a public peace and people would willingly give up national sovereignty in order to achieve peace, and thereby this would bring in the New International Political System. This was stated and very impressive thing to hear then:
"If there were too many people in the right places who resisted this, there might be a need to use one or two -possibly more- nuclear weapons. As it was put this would be possibly needed to convince people that 'We mean business'."
That was followed by the statement that:
"By the time one or two of those went off then everybody – even the most reluctant – would yield."
He said something about "this negotiated peace would be very convincing," as kind of in a framework or in a context that the whole thing was rehearsed but nobody would know it. People hearing about it would be convinced that it was a genuine negotiation between hostile enemies who finally had come to the realization that peace was better than war.
So, is this Middle East confrontation scripted and everyone knows their lines?
Was 9/11 done (by Israel) because the USA was not conforming to the plan divulged by Day?
And is the whole sordid story of the war and regime change in seven nations in five years designed to trick and/or persuade us into accepting this plan otherwise the nukes will be lobbed because "they mean business"?
I can find no mention by Day of Israel, but perhaps if he had ranted on for longer then he would have divulged the bloody purpose of Israel.
It would make sense to go softly, softly, but have a back up if the plan falls behind schedule. A lot of what Day stated would happen has happened so the plan has been successful to some degree.
But if it has fallen behind schedule so much that they had to do 9/11 then what does that tell us?
And 9/11 was ELEVEN years ago!!
And Syria is kicking al Qaeda butt, spoiling the war and regime change plan.
And still no world government.
Oh dear.
Deary, deary me.
Tut. Tut. Tut.
No comments:
Post a Comment