BARINGS AND THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Thomas Willing was a merchant and banker who attended the Continental Congress of 1775 and 1776 but opposed the Declaration of Independence. He was a business partner of Robert Morris. Despite his opposition to independence Willing was appointed the first President of the Bank of North America and the first President of the Bank of the United States (BUS1). In 1774 he appointed Francis Baring as his banker in London. Willing married Anne McCall. Their children included Anne Willing who married William Bingham, a Senator from Pennsylvania. Their children included Ann and Maria. Ann married Alexander Baring. Maria married Henry Baring. Alexander and Henry were brothers and their father was...Francis Baring. So not jut one, but two granddaughters of the President of the Bank of North America and the Bank of the United States marry into the Baring family.

So who was Francis Baring? Francis Baring was a director of the British East India Company. His sister Elizabeth married John Dunning who was a good friend of Lord Shelburne. Francis' son Alexander, who married Ann Bingham, the granddaughter of Thomas Willing, formed Sun Alliance Assurance with Nathan Mayer Rothschild in 1824. And the Barings were allegedly involved in running opium and slaves.

Willing appointed Barings the European bankers of The United States.

Biddle and the Second Bank of the United States (BUS2) continued this arrangement.

For a glimpse into just how cosy the relationship was between Biddle and Barings see
"The House of Baring and the Second Bank of the United States, 1826-1836" by R. W. Hidy in The Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography, Vol. 68, No. 3 (Jul., 1944), pp. 269-285. Barings could easily have let the USA crash any number of times because Biddle went way over the overdraft the USA had with Barings a few times without agreement, and asked for huge credit when the USA was facing financial trouble. This annoyed Barings but they acquiesced and in the end made a huge profit from doing so.

But Barings' business with BUS2 was without question helping the USA to very quickly develop into a huge economic rival to the British Empire.

So why would the British want to destroy BUS2, as Michael Kirsch and Anton Chaitkin show?

Or was it just the Rothschilds, not the British?

One of the consequences of the destruction was that Jackson made the Rothschilds bankers to the USA, replacing Barings.

So was the destruction of BUS2 just a turf war between Barings and the Rothschilds?

Or was there more to it, as Chaitkin and Kirsch show?

I have suggested that the USA has had a destiny pre-planned millenia ago. On this I agree with David Icke. All the Freemasonic stuff, the parades, ceremonies, regalia, processions, cannot be ignored. Two symbols that cannot be ignored are:
1. the inverted, irregular and incomplete pentagram to the north of the White House, particularly when America's warmongering and terrorism is taken in to consideration (I mean, how can a God fearing Christian nation turn into Satan's attack dog?)
2. the cornerstone of the Capitol laid by George Washington in a Freemasonic ceremony which had a plaque with text that implied Freemasonry is approximately 6000 years old! We are led to believe it was only formed in 1717.

My gut feeling is that:
1. The Rothschilds had nothing to do with Bank of North America, BUS1 or BUS2 until Jackson made them European bankers to the USA, replacing Barings.
2. Barings involvement in American banking is being covered up by several authors and documentary makers.
3. Barings may have been allowing the USA to develop too quickly for the Satanists running the conspiracy so BUS2 was destroyed and responsibility for American financial dealings with Europe was handed to the Rothschilds
4. but because BUS2 was doing so well and threatening the British Empire BUS2 had to be discredited so it and national banks before it have been portrayed as Rothschild projects from the start, when in fact at that time the Rothschilds were still building their European network and had some but nowhere near as much power as they pretend.