Pages

Wednesday, January 01, 2014

2014 : THE CENTENARY OF THE FREEMASONIC CONSPIRACY OF WORLD WAR ONE

On 28th June 1914 Arch Duke Ferdinand was assassinated in Sarajevo. The slaughter that we call World War One was, according to official history books, about the economics of competing empires which arose from the assassination of Ferdinand which, according to official history books, was due to nationalism in The Balkans.

But perhaps this is all a load of bollocks?

In his memoirs, Kaiser Wilhelm II provides evidence that:
1. after the war broke out it was found that the British had been preparing for war years earlier by, for example, storing war materials in 'neutral' Belgium;
2. he was told by a distinguished German Freemason that the Grand Orient Lodge had planned the war to destroy the central European governments.

The alliance that encircled Germany was prepared years earlier by Prince Edward, later King Edward VII, who was Grand Master of the United Grand Lodge of England, which is THE mother lodge of global freemasonry from which all other lodges are derived and beholden to.

It was widely known in Freemasonic circles that Ferdinand had been condemned to death by Freemasonry...AND HE KNEW IT!

At their trial the assassins admitted:
1. to being Freemasons;
2. they knew Freemasonry had condemned Ferdinand to death;
3. they knew Freemasonry was seeking willing assassins to kill Ferdinand;
4. they received a revolver and bullets from Freemasonry;
5. Freemasonry gave them encouragement.

After the assassination Wilhelm was told by King George V that Great Britain would not involve itself in any war due to the Freemasonic assassination of Ferdinand. Sir Edward Grey, a disciple of King Edward VII and a key member of the Milner/Rhodes network of British imperialists, did not tell Germany that Great Britain would join in any war, and did not tell France that Great Britain would not support them. This devilish diplomacy led to a series of declarations of war. But when Germany invaded Belgium it was Grey who immediately demanded that 'neutral' Belgium be defended even though the 1839 Treaty of London that Grey cited as the casus belli did not demand that Great Britain defend Belgium unilaterally.

THIS IS NO HOAX!





No comments:

Post a Comment