A THIRD AND VERY WELL HIDDEN POSSIBILITY

Guy Keleny at The (not so) Independent has joined in the Germany-bashing and accused Kaiser Wilhelm II of starting World War One all on his own.

However, I confess that I am with Max Hastings in pointing the finger of blame for the bungle overwhelmingly at one man: Kaiser Bill.

[source : Guy Keleny, Should Britain have joined World War One? Keep these points in mind during the argument, The Independent, http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/comment/should-britain-have-joined-world-war-one-keep-these-points-in-mind-during-the-argument-9322604.html, 4th May 2014]

Keleny uses poetry to add emotion to his exceptionally biased argument. He quotes Wilfred Owen's Dulce et Decorum Est, which I did a few months ago. However, I suggested that the title of that classic anti war poem should be amended to expose the true culprits behind the organised slaughter of World War One. That new title should be Dulce et Decorum Est Pro Freemasonry Mori. Keleny then reminds us that the lower ranks of the British Army were occupied by working class peasants from the slums and their officers were sons of the ruling class. Keleny then describes the improvements in fire power and the kind of weaponry that the lowly British squaddies faced in World War One.

This reference to the plight of the lowly British squaddie implies that Keleny cares.

But in this centenary of World War One there is very little if any attempt by any reporter or author to address any possible conspiracy behind World War One. Keleny continues this in his opening paragraph:

The battle lines are drawn. On the one hand, the First World War was a necessary struggle and Britain had no alternative but to play its part: on the other, the war was a tragic mess that came about by mistake, and we should have stayed out. Bungling statesmen got us into it, and bungling generals made sure it would be a four-year nightmare of futile slaughter.

That is the choice that Keleny gives us. It is one or the other. And he is not alone. The vast majority fall into one or the other camp.

But there is a third and very well hidden possibility - that World War One was a bloody British conspiracy.

I am proud that I believe that World War One was a bloody British conspiracy.

As pointed at on this blog many, many times:
1. the British had created a committee to manipulate tension in the Balkans using organisations created by top Freemason and British Intelligence agent Giuseppe Mazzini;
2. Freemasonry (nice chaps) had condemned Arch Duke Ferdinand to death almost 2 years before his assassination;
3. Freemasonry was seeking willing assassins to assassinate Ferdinand but had not yet found them;
4. Apis allegedly thought of the idea to kill Ferdinand, but this was well after Freemasonry had condemned Ferdinand to death;
5. This led to one of the Freemason assassins making contact with Freemasons abroad, who gave the assassins the weapons and encouragement to assassinate Ferdinand, as revealed in the testimony of the assassins at their trial;
6. upon Ferdinand's assassination the British posed as neutral during the outrage, King George even telling Kaiser Wilhelm that the British would stay out of any resulting war, thus encouraging mobilisation;
7. Sir Edward Grey did not make it clear that if Germany invaded Belgium then Great Britain would defend Belgium's neutrality, even though Great Britain had been violating Belgium's neutrality throughout 1914;
8. but as soon as Germany invaded Belgium, Grey instantly cited the 1839 Treaty of London which Great Britain was not legally obliged to honour;
9. After the war Kaiser Wilhelm wrote in his memoirs that a top Freemason told him that Freemasonry had engineered the war to create a power vacuum in Central Europe.

Anyone who ignores this evidence of a bloody British conspiracy is an...