THIS IS WHAT THIS BLOG SAYS

As stated earlier. This is what this blog says. What do you agree/disagree with?

1. World War One was a British Freemasonic conspiracy to establish a world government, The League of Nations, under their control. King Edward VII as Grand Master of the United Grand Lodge of England engineered the Triple Entente. This job was finalised by Sir Edward Grey, a protege of Edward. Freemasonry had condemned Ferdinand to death. The assassins of Arch Duke Ferdinand were Freemasons, had received the material and encouragement for the assassination from foreign Freemasons, and knew that Freemasonry was looking for assassins to kill Ferdinand and had condemned Ferdinand to death. King George V told Kaiser Wilhelm that Great Britain would not fight in any war. Grey misrepresented the British position, not making it clear to Germany what would happen if Germany invaded Belgium, but as soon as Germany invaded Belgium the 1839 Treaty of London was cited to declare war on Germany when Great Britain was not legally bound to defend Belgium unilaterally. After the war Kaiser Wilhelm wrote in his memoirs that he was told by a distinguished Freemason that Freemasonry had engineered the war to create a power vacuum in Central Europe. That vacuum was filled by The League of Nations, whose first President was James Eric Drummond, a protege of Sir Edward Grey. In addition to this, WW1 allowed the British/Jewish/Freemasonic Empire to eventually overthrow the Romanovs. Freemasonry had attempted several times in the first half of the 19th Century to overthrow the Russian rulers, but Freemasonry was eventually banned in Russia, leading to no attempt at revolution in Russia for 44 years. But then Alexander II decided to help Lincoln defeat the Britsh-supported slave-owning Confederacy in the US civil war by sending he The Russian Navy to New York and San Francisco. Lincoln won the war but was assassinated by a British conspiracy. This victory over the Confederacy also led to an immediate explosion in attempts to assassinate Alexander II. When, after several failed attempts, he was eventually assassinated, there were several attempts on his successor's life. The British through Anglophile Jewish bankers Rothschild and Schiff financed Japan against Russia in 1904 and supported revolution in Russia in 1905, but that failed. However, after 3 years of fighting against Germany in the Freemasonic-engineered World War 1, Russia was finally ready for revolution. Lenin was sent into Russia by the Warburgs on a sealed train loaded with Rothschild gold, while Trotsky who was living in New York was given an American passport, was detained at Halifax, Canada on his way to Russia but was released on the orders of the British Admiralty to join the revolution in Russia. But according to Christian Rakovsky, Trotsky was supposed to continue the revolution into Europe, but nationalists Lenin and Stalin stalled the world revolution. This, according to Rakovsky, is why Hitler was created, to lead to the overthrow of Stalin by Trotsky, but Stalin killed Trotsky before this could occur, so Hitler was unleashed onto Russia the following year. We have no way of verifying if Rakovsky ever said this or if it is made up. Some things Rakovsky says ring true, but the interrogations were allegedly 'found' in the belongings of a dead man and describe events that occured years earlier. So some doubt remains.

2. Sir Edward Grey was appointed British Ambassador to the USA to persuade it to join the League of Nations, the same League of Nations that he proposed to Colonel House in 1915. But Grey failed. Another explanation for WW2, and the one I believe in, is that because the USA voted to stay out of The League of Nations, both Wall Street and The City of London created both Nazi Germany and Communist Russia, whose close proximity guaranteed another world war. To persuade the USA that it should join the world government that was to be proposed after the engineered chaos it was necessary that the USA be dragged into the bloodlust from the start. This was achieved through the attack at Pearl Harbor. The result of WW2 was The United Nations, which since its creation has been gradually assuming more and more control over national sovereignty. The UN is supported by a network of continental governments like the EU, NAU, etc, related free trade agreements and other world institutions such as the IMF.

3. 9/11 was an inside job which was designed to kick off wars in North Africa and the Middle East as detailed in the Zionist warmongering documents A Clean Break and Rebuilding America's Defenses. Key members of PNAC were in charge of the US military on 9/11 as it was conveniently AWOL, allowing Saudi-supplied patsies to create the "new Pearl Harbor" that the Zionists/PNAC wanted to go on their bloody global warmongering rampage. Shortly after 9/11 General Wesley Clark was told that the plan was for totaler krieg on nations named in A Clean Break and Rebuilding America's Defenses: Iraq, Iran, Syria and Lebanon, with Libya, Sudan and Somalia. But by 2007 this plan was moribund so a Plan B was agreed that Saudi Arabia, having supplied the patsies for 9/11, would unleash cutthroat Jihadis onto Lebanon, Syria and Iran to either overthrow their current governments or cause so much carnage and such a humanitarian disaster that NATO would intervene under R2P. But to hide the medieval barbarity of the cutthroat Jihadis so that NATO could support them the cutthroat Jihadis needed cover, which was provided by US State Department's The Arab Spring. These Jihadis were first unleashed onto Libya, a war which Owen Jones supported, and then onto Syria, where for over for 3 years they have been slitting the throats of defenceless Syrian children, eating the hearts of their prisoners and last August, in a desperate attempt to provoke large scale military intervention by NATO on their behalf, they pulled a fast one by claiming that Assad had used chemical weapons at Ghouta, killing a thousand Syrian civilians, when they stood to benefit from such action (cui bono?), they possessed chemical weapons, they had posted videos of their experiments with chemical weapons on the internet, and their sponsor Bandar bin Sultan had personally threatened President Putin that he, Bandar, would unleash hell on earth in Syria if Putin didn't dump Assad.

A letter is alleged to have been written by Albert Pike to Giuseppe Mazzini detailing, or Pike otherwise proposed, a plan for three world wars to create a world government. The man who exposed this alleged letter to the world was William Guy Carr. However, no physical evidence for the existence of this letter has been provided. All we have is Carr's claim to have read it and he does not provide a reliable reference for it. Indeed, Carr's references to Cardinal Rodriguez are muddled. Carr wrote of this letter after WW2, so the paragraphs referring to world wars 1 and 2 could have been written after the fact. And Carr is very sympathetic to King Edward VIII, who was forced to abdicate because he was a bona fide Nazi who continued to collaborate with the Nazis even after being banished to a quiet corner of the British Empire while we were at war with the Nazis. Carr's books are strongly anti-Communist, and blame 'the Jews' and Jews alone for all our troubles as part of a Jewish Illuminati conspiracy while absolving the British Royal family of any wrongdoing. I was once a believer that Carr was possibly right. But this now makes me suspicious of Carr and that damned letter.

4. Great Britain has had a Covenant of Security with the Islamic terrorists for well over a decade. We created al Qaeda to kick Russia out of Afghanistan, but continued that relationship into the 1990s, allowing Osama bin Laden to live in London, and allowing other Islamic terrorist organisations to recruit and locate their HQs in London. When several nations offered to either capture and hand over bin Laden, or when the opportunity to assassinate bin Laden arose, these opportunities were refused. Bin Laden was later accused of 9/11. He denies involvement. The FBI did not explicitly list 9/11 as a crime for which he was wanted. Dossiers on his guilt were promised but were never produced, or those that were were laughable. Bin Laden died from Marfan Syndrome in late 2001/early 2002, which explains why he rarely appeared in videos after 9/11, and only lookalikes were used in those that were released. The most comical video was that taken from behind what is alleged to be bin Laden as he watched TV allegedly in the compound in Abbotabad where he was allegedly killed in 2011. This comedy was reinforced by the staged photos and ever changing and contradictory narratives of what actually happened at the compound. But what cannot be denied is that by 2001 the Taliban had reduced the Afghan opium harvest to virtually zero, but after a decade of NATO presence and protection that harvest was at record levels and the resulting explosion of heroin addiction is destroying NATO enemies Russia and Iran, as well as our own youth. Our ruling families have been controlling the opium trade for centuries.

5. There is something not right with both the revelations of Ed Snowden and the media reaction to them. Snowden's revelations were brought to us by that flag ship of the NATO media, The Guardian, but also The Washington Post, the mouthpiece of Bilderberg. His revelations about spying were on the front pages not just for one day, or just 2 days. His revelations were on the front pages for months! Even after he 'escaped' to Russia! But what has he told us? A significant minority were already aware of Echelon in 1999. It would have been naive to believe that Echelon would not have evolved with the rise in social media and other forms of electronic and digital communication. I would not be surprised if the NSA and GCHQ had power of veto on a lot of technology in the public arena, allowing only those they thought could be hacked. But what has happened since last year? The world now knows we are spied on, but laws have been changed to allow such spying, and most people are thankful for it because of the threat of al Qaeda in Syria and Iraq. And as explained above, MI5 allowed the butcher of Lee Rigby, Michael Adebalajo, and others to preach Jihad against Assad on the streets of London (and apparently Bristol too) to create a constant supply of Jihadis to join al Qaeda in Syria, from where they have now invaded Iraq under the flag of ISIS. Cameron, May, the heads of MI5, MI6, GCHQ all now cry that Snowden has aided the enemy al Qaeda and demand more surveillance powers to 'protect' us. Meanhwile, Snowden's assistant Glenn Greenwald has had well over a year to expose everything that Snowden has to say, but after all that time he is still, according to his own admission in GQ magazine, sitting on NSA bombshells, while finding the time to sign lucrative contracts. Greenwald has teamed up with Jeremy Scahill. It was Scahill who became a NATO media darling last November, with fawning articles written about him in both The Guardian and The Independent, as he bullied Stop The War to kick Mother Agnes Mariam off their guest speaker list, but Agnes had the humility to spare Stop The War the embarrassment of obliging the vain petulant Scahill and withdrew herself. Scahill is on video stating that he is a 9/11 gatekeeper and believes the official 9/11 narrative. As does Snowden, which is why he was prepared to believe Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld and go to Iraq to kill Iraqis after 9/11. USA! USA! USA! USA! USA!

6. Alexander Litvinenko was murdered in late 2006. Most fingers immediately pointed at Putin. Mine didn't. Well over 7 years later and we have still not seen any evidence to support this claim. And despite calls for a public inquiry from all sides, the British government has always found an excuse to withhold what evidence it says it has. Last year would have been the perfect opportunity to reveal to the world the evidence that Putin killed Litvinenko, as the UK, France, USA, Saudi Arabia and all the other Friends of Syrian Terrorists were looking for ways to embarrass Putin into dumping Assad. Indeed, they sent Bandar to Moscow to personally threaten Putin. But instead of revealing what evidence they say they have, they instead chose to murder hundreds of Syrian children and claim that Assad had used chemical weapons. And this links to point 5. because Mother Agnes Mariam claims there is good evidence to show that the dead children shown in videos that the Syrian rebels claim were taken immediately after the alleged use of chemical weapons at Ghouta were actually children from the town of Lattakia which was invaded a few weeks before Ghouta by Syrian rebels who took the children away. Parents of those children have identified their children in those videos. So rather than reveal what evidence they say they have on Putin, they would rather klll hundreds of Syrian children. What does that say about our leaders, eh? And another strange thing about the Litvinenko death. Litvinenko worked for Boris Berezovsky, who was given one whole BBC QT to attack Putin and Russia, and to call for violent revolution in Russia to overthrow Putin. Just before Berezovsky was due to give evidence about Litvinenko he allegedly committed suicide, and in a very strange and awkward way. And Berezovsky had written to Putin asking for clemency and a return to Russia. Was all this due to Putin seeking fairer terms on Russian natural resources and for jailing Mikhail Khordokovsky, the agent of the Rothschilds in Russia?

7. Banking in the early United States is not something I was interested in at school, but it is to me now a fascinating subject. I once believed in The Money Masters, and Secrets of The Federal Reserve, but after my own research both of these are hiding something. I believe that President Andrew Jackson was a traitor, witting or unwitting, more likely witting due to his clear association with Aaron Burr and Martin van Buren. This view is due to the works of LPAC. However, there are several anomalies that they also need to explain. These are:
a) why was Thomas Willing, with his clear family links and deep friendship to the Baring family, who were apparently at the heart of the British Empire, allowed to run the early banks of the United States?
b) why were Barings, despite their links to The British East India Company and The British Empire, appointed agents of The United States Government?
c) why did Barings support the expansion of the USA (they assisted the purchases of Louisiana, Alaska), support the USA in 1812 war AGAINST the British, extended huge lines of credit to Nicholas Biddle for the BUS2 which if denied could have destroyed the USA (which the British Empire allegedly wanted), and even assisted Lincoln by financing the purchase of warships for The Union during the British-engineered US Civil War?
d) there appears to have been some kind of turf war between The Rothschilds and Barings over the USA. Was the attack on BUS2 due to this and nothing more? I have written to both Webster Tarpley and Anton Chaitkin about this, but so far without reply.

8. One of the great mysteries of the world is the clear presence of that most Satanic of symbols, the inverted, irregular and incomplete pentagram, pointing down into the White House, in the street design of Washington DC. The architecture of DC is so Masonic it is ridiculous to deny that Masonry has had some long term project for America. The most damning evidence is that the cornerstone of The Capitol was laid in a bizarre Masonic ceremony (aren't they usually?), and involved laying a plaque referring to the year of Masonry 5793, which indicates that Masonry is approximately 6000 years old and not just a few centuries old as most Masonic sites would have you believe. In fact, it is fair to say that the USA is The United States of Masonry. But along with this plaque is the obelisk called The Washington Monument, all street designs marking out hexagrams etc, some lined up with sunrises and sunsets on special days. It is all there. Yet there is no book that I am aware of that was written by the founding fathers to explain why this was done! It is all very bizarre. But then again, we are talking about Masonry, the engineers of World War 1, and if my argument in point 2. above is correct, then also WW2. But in addition to the inverted, irregular and incomplete pentagram is Moloch, which has The Capitol in its belly. Moloch the owl is the symbol of Bohemian Grove, at which a mock human sacrifice occurs in front of a 40 ft stone owl to the sounds of demonic laughter played over a PA system.

9. Since the fall of the Berlin Wall, NATO has reneged on its statement to Russia that it would not expand, and has expanded relentlessly, so much so that Ukraine is about to be NATO-ised. From Checkpoint Charlie to the checkpoints between Ukraine and Russia, NATO has expanded and expanded and expanded, consuming most of what was the western part of the Soviet Empire. In 2004 there was a CIA Color Revolution in Ukraine sponsored by Berezovsky and Soros. This was one in a series of Color Revolutions in the former Soviet Bloc. But it failed. Between now and then a Russophobe and then a Russophile has run Ukraine. The EU and IMF were seeking a deal with Ukraine, but the Russophile Yanukovich was offered a better deal by Putin, so Yanukovich went for that. It was then that all hell broke loose in Ukraine. Snipers shooting from buildings occupied by protestors shot dead protestors. The police were accused in NATO media of the killings. The protestors, by this time hijacked by bona fide neo Nazis, stormed government buildings, chased the legitimate government away and made themselves rulers. Neo Nazis then occupied very powerful positions in the new 'government', including national security and justice. The new PM, Yatseniuk, aka Yats, was hand picked by the US State Dept's Victoria Nuland, the wife of founder of PNAC (see point 3 above), and runs a foundation indirectly linked to Soros but which explicitly lists NATO as a partner! Nuland has also admitted that the USA has spent over $5 billion on regime change in Ukraine. So it is fair to say that Ukraine has just suffered a violent NATO-sponsored neo-Nazi coup. In Odessa, protestors against the neo Nazi junta were chased into a building which was subsequently set ablaze, forcing the protestors to jump from 2nd and 3rd floor windows, where they were shot at by the neo Nazis, and if they survived the jump were beaten to death by the neo Nazis. A recent protest outside the Russian Embassy in Kiev turned violent and Nazi swastikas were painted on the fence of the embassy. But according to the NATO flag ship The Guardian, exposer of The Snowden Revelations, what occured in Ukraine was a romantic bloodless uprising of downtrodden Ukrainians against a Russophile tyranny. But were the protests in The Maidan brutally put down? No. So how could it have been a tyranny? The real heavy duty violence started when Yanukovich decided to sign the deal with Russia and the violence came from the neo Nazis. Now the new Ukraine government is signing or negotiating all sorts of deals with the EU and IMF. A text book coup.

10. Bilderberg has a very strong influence on current affairs. It was started and financed by the financiers of and collaborators with the Nazis, the Rockefellers. The revelations of Willy Claes in 2010, in which he exposed how Bilderberg works, are testament to what we believed sort of happened at Bilderberg. Attendees are invited to give talks, to express their point of view, and are then given tasks by the Bilderberg Steering Committee (or whoever controls them) to do within their sphere of influence to advance the Bilderberg agenda. So what is their agenda? More world government by stealth. And more fascist austerity.

11. JFK was assassinated. Oliver Stone first raised my curiosity in the deep state with his film on JFK. it was after watching this film that I read his references which led me to borrowing a number of related books from the local library on this subject and others. I believe it was this that started the gang stalking which has led to the zapping. The thesis of Stone's film is that it was The Cubans with assistance from disgruntled anti-Communist CIA and top brass in revenge for JFK abandoning the invasion of Cuba at The Bay of Pigs and for rapprochement with Russia. However, there is a lot more to it than that, which implicates the British Empire, who JFK was threatening with his policies of global development. This sort of links to FDR too. LPAC and Tarpley give some good evidence that FDR was not the devil he is portrayed to be. I believe that he was innocent of Pearl Harbor, and that he intended to dismantle the British Empire after WW2, which is why he was poisoned to death, and why there was no autopsy, and why his body has not been exhumed for an autopsy. FDR still has some questions to answer, such as why he appointed George C Marshall, who is implicated in Pearl Harbor and advancing Communism.

12. Russia Today is beginning to concern me a bit. Zac Goldsmith MP has appeared on a number of occasions recently. Yet Goldsmith has recently married into THE Rothschild banking family, the one that established NM Rothschild, the bank that dominated the gold market for centuries, and arguably financed the creation of that curse upon mankind, Israel. Goldsmith appeared on RT to push recall, which is unnecessary and open to abuse. Yet not one presenter or reporter on RT asked Goldsmith what he or his in-laws know about 9/11!! Not even Galloway!! Other concerns are:
a) when the crisis in Ukraine kicked off, Abby Martin kicked off the criticism of the Russian government while ignoring the blatant presence and violent influence of neo Nazis and the obvious hands of NATO pulling the strings. This eventually led to another presenter resigning in protest at Putin. This whole episode was used to embarrass Putin.
b) NATO media was banned from reporting on the case of Holly Greig, a girl who was allegedly abused by a paedophile ring that could have led all the way into Downing Street. By reporting on this RT could have caused some serious embarrassment to the British government, but as far as I am aware this opportunity was not taken. Was RT also slapped with a ban on reporting on this? If so, by whom? And why? And why did RT acquiesce?
c) There were 2 recent Snowden days on RT. The first celebrating Snowden's revelations, the second celebrating his escape to Russia. Whole days were filled with Snowden, Snowden, Snowden. Yet on Youtube there are several videos of General Wesley Clark relating what he experienced regarding 9/11, i.e. the plan for totaler krieg and Wolfowitz stating in 1991 that the USA had 5 to 10 years to take out those old Soviet client regimes; Iraq, Iran, Syria. So why hasn't RT had one day dedicated to Clark's Revelations? Has RT shown one of Clark's videos, or excerpts from one? The wars in the Middle East could be stopped by such a dedicated exposure. But with the above, I am not that confident it will occur. Thus I refer to Russia Today as Rothschild Today. Whether Putin is aware of this, or exercises editorial policy at RT, I don't know.