Today's daily stab at The Guardian is again on an editorial. Editorials reflect the true policy of the paper. It may allow particular reporters and commentators, such as Owen Jones and Seamus Milne, to publish to give it a sham veneer of anti-imperialism, but the editorials are the true voice of the paper. And the editorials of The Guardian are pro-war, pro-Israel, anti-Russia and anti-truth.
Islamic State are a threat to the very existence of the universe. That is what we are told. That's what Callous Cameron and the most of the members of The Marsten House tell us, so it must be true, mustn't it?
But if so, then why did the UK only send 6 Tornadoes to get IS? Why did it take 6 missions before any bomb was dropped on any IS target? And even then why was it a solitary pick up truck in the middle of nowhere instead of on IS cutthroat bandits just outside Baghdad or Kobani?
An alliance with Assad would destroy IS.
But apparently The Guardian is against it.
Why?
Because the true purpose of the creation IS and this bogus war on IS is to oust Assad to clear a path for a $10 billion pipeline to transport Qatari natural gas across Syria to Turkey (hence Turkey's deep interest in ousting Assad) and on to Europe to ween Europe off its dependency on Russia for energy.
Simples!
No comments:
Post a Comment