SATELLITE IMAGE OF MH17 ALLEGEDLY BEING SHOT DOWN IS FAKE

The timing was suspicious. And the image was fortuitous, just like that video of the BUK with missing missiles allegedly shot in Luhansk on 18th July.

The photo was published on a Russian forum in October!!

But all this means is that Russia probably does not have satellite images of the shoot down by a fighter, otherwise they would have been released by now instead of releasing a dubious image on the eve of a G20 meeting. But they say they still have radar data.

So was this a prank by the CIA? It is possible. But surely upon receipt this would have been immediately sent to the Russian Ministry of Defence for analysis before being allowed to be released on a prime Russian TV channel? Maybe they did genuinely believe it to be real? If so then that is scary.

So was this a prank by the Russians? Well, I expressed some doubts about this image because Putin is in Brisbane at the G20, where lots of world 'leaders' are baying for his blood. Release of this image and the RT report yesterday on extra radar data were probably designed to stifle criticism of Putin in Brisbane by those world 'leaders' (most of whom are supporting the Kiev Nazis as they shell Donetsk and by the looks of things soon lay siege to Luhansk).

So where does this leave us regarding evidence on MH17? After Belling Cat released their report last weekend I expressed my doubts about that report. In its final analysis that report suggested that a BUK seen on a red loader pulled by a white cabin travelling east from Donetsk and then seen later in Torez and Sizhne was originally part of a convoy of BUKs from Russia, and that because, it is assumed, the same red loader and white cabin were filmed transporting a BUK with missing missiles allegedly in Luhansk on 18th July, and because the red loader and white cabin had been stolen by the separatists and seen in their possession at other times, then Russia virtually shot down MH17. However, the report questioned when that fortuitous video was filmed, but stated with supreme confidence that the video of the BUK with missing missiles was shot in Luhansk and not in Krasnodon, as stated by the Ukraine Interior Minister. So I questioned why the separatists would transport the smoking gun BUK to Luhansk when Luhansk was a war zone infested with Kiev Nazis, all eager to find that BUK, to the south and west of Luhansk, and Luhansk was a possible dead end for that BUK, when it would be much safer and easier to transport it to Krasnodon. But if the Ukraine Interior Minister says the BUK was filmed in Krasnodon when it was actually filmed in Luhansk, then we can question the time that that video was shot. I proposed that it would make much more sense for the separatists to transport any BUK that was in Sizhne directly to Krasnodon far, far away from the Kiev Nazis. I suggested that the BUK in that dodgy video was actually the BUK that shot down the Antonov An 26 at Luhansk on 14th July. Again, that is only a suggestion but makes a bit more sense than the separatists driving a BUK with the covers removed to show missing missiles into a war zone infested with Kiev Nazis.

This is not to rubbish the Belling Cat report. There was some good stuff in there, but it failed to achieve what it set out to do, and that was to prove that Russia shot down MH17. The report showed that it is possible that a BUK originally from a Russian convoy of BUKs was seen near Donetsk, Torez and Sizhne on 17th July, but did NOT, repeat NOT, prove that that particular BUK shot down MH17.

I think:
1. Russia probably does not have satellite images of the shoot down otherwise they would have been released by now, and their media would not have been allowed to release this fake. But then where is the evidence that NATO says it has that proves the separatists shot MH17 down?
2. this could have been a prank by the CIA, but surely the Russians would have smelled a CIA rat if one of their media received by email a satellite image of MH17 allegedly being shot down? Perhaps they weren't shown it? Perhaps Channel 1 went ahead without consulting the Russian military and intelligence community? Hmm. Doubtful.
3. so this was probably a Russian psyop to minimize attacks on Putin at the G20. But if so then surely they would have released something less dramatic but not fake? Maybe that's what the radar data was but the fake image was found to be fake.

But I ask again and again and again:
1. what about the ATC who tweeted in real time that MH17 was shot down by a fighter and that the Kiev Nazis came to his control and he has since been deported from Ukraine and fears for his life?
2. why did the Kiev Nazis grab the transcripts of contact with MH17 from ATC and have kept them secret since, only releasing portions to an investigation team who Kiev can veto on what that team can see and publish?
3. what and where is NATO's evidence?

And I repeat:
No slam dunk evidence, only a weak suggestion which I think I have weakened further this week, has been provided by NATO or anyone else that MH17 was shot down by a BUK that came from Russia.

I fully support Russia in its attempts to establish an alternative to the Bohemian Grove/IMF/NATO cabal of kiddie-fiddling, warmongering megalomaniacs, but they can do better than this!