It is extraordinary that Mohammed Emwazi, a man as evil and delusional as it is possible to be – a man who so callously beheads innocents in pursuit of flawed beliefs – escaped the attentions of the security services. But the fact is, we now know that he didn’t: he was known to MI5, he was known to be associating with fanatics, and he was even on a terror watchlist.
It has also been reported that MI5 tried to recruit Emwazi after it was suspected that he was attempting to join a Somali extremist group. Somehow, despite supposedly being unable to leave the country, he was still able to make his way to Syria and join Islamic State in 2013.
These failures are part of a worrying pattern.
[source : David Davis MP, If MI5 sticks to outdated tactics, Emwazi won’t be the last British security failure, The Guardian, http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/feb/27/mi5-mohammed-emwazi-security-failures-terrorists-free, 27th February 2015]
Davis highlighted several examples of where an alleged culprit in a crime of terrorism was well known to the intelligence services of their nation, citing examples in the UK, USA and France, which I must add are the same nations now interfering in Syria and Iraq due to this entity that allegedly came from nowhere, Islamic State.
But we are not talking about some part time amateur organisation who only meet down the pub for a few pints on a Thursday evening. We are talking about MI5, MI6 and GCHQ, tasked with defending the realm (and the City of London). Well actually, that is not their full role: besides defend the realm they also go on the attack for the realm.
But where has this Jihadism come from that attracted Emwazi, Adebalajo and thousands of other British Muslims who have travelled abroad to commit violence and terror against a foreign nation in the name of Islam?
And who actually benefits from their actions?
A year ago, if I said Islamic Terrorist you would have immediately thought of al Qaeda. But we created al Qaeda as a proxy force to oust the USSR from Afghanistan. But they proved so useful that the project was kept going. These terrorists were allowed to live and openly recruit in London in what is known as The Covenant of Security in which the terrorists could operate out of London as long as their actions coincided with British foreign policy. This was revealed by Nafeez Ahmed, who has now taken that thesis a bit further and shown in detail how British Intelligence is running both sides of the war on terror.
Every time there’s a terrorist attack that makes national headlines, the same talking heads seem to pop up like an obscene game of “whack-a-mole”. Often they appear one after the other across the media circuit, bobbing from celebrity television pundit to erudite newspaper outlet.
A few years ago, BBC Newsnight proudly hosted a “debate” between Maajid Nawaz, director of counter-extremism think-tank, the Quilliam Foundation, and Anjem Choudary, head of the banned Islamist group formerly known as al-Muhajiroun, which has, since its proscription, repeatedly reincarnated itself. One of its more well-known recent incarnations was "Islam4UK".
Both Nawaz and Choudary have received huge mainstream media attention, generating press headlines, and contributing to major TV news and current affairs shows. But unbeknown to most, they have one thing in common: Britain’s security services. And believe it or not, that bizarre fact explains why the Islamic State’s (IS) celebrity beheader, former west Londoner Mohammed Emwazi – aka “Jihadi John” - got to where he is now.
[source : Nafeez Ahmed, The circus: How British intelligence primed both sides of the ‘terror war’, Middle East Eye, http://www.middleeasteye.net/columns/circus-how-british-intelligence-primed-both-sides-terror-war-55293733, 27th February 2015]
Ahmed then details how the British government wrote fake books to promote violent Jihadism and used fake Jihadists as fronts for those books.
Ahmed ends with this suggestion:
If only we could round up the Quilliam and al-Muhajiroun fanatics together, shove them onto a boat, and send them all off cruising to the middle of nowhere, they could have all the fun they want “radicalising” and “deradicalising” each other to their hearts content. And we might get a little peace. And perhaps we could send their handlers with them, too.
Michael Adebalajo was known to the intelligence services as a known Jihadi and drug dealer, but he was allowed to preach on the streets of London Jihad against President Bashar al Assad of Syria.
Somehow three schoolgirls were allowed to enter Syria to join Islamic State despite one of them being in open contact with a wife of a known Islamic State fighter.
The violence in Syria was foretold in Seymour Hersh's The Redirection of 2007 in which he said that the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia had agreed that the latter would unleash cutthroat Jihadis onto Syria, Lebanon and Iran. Two years later, former French foreign minister Roland Dumas was asked by Great Britain to draw up a plan to smuggle Jihadis into Syria. NATO assisted what was essentially al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb against Gaddafi, who went on to kill Gaddafi. And then it all kicked off big time in Syria. It was at this time that known Jihadi Emwazi was allowed to travel to Syria.
This is more than a pattern. This is a deliberate policy to encourage violent Islamic terrorism against Syria.
And this is because the original plan for war and regime change in seven nations in five years as revealed to General Wesley Clark shortly after 9/11, which was the biggest false flag to provide the casus belli for those wars, had by 2007 become moribund. But the cutthroat Jihadis needed cover so that NATO could provide them weapons, finance, training and even air support, so the US State Department ran The Arab Spring which portrayed al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb in Libya in 2011 as 'freedom fighters'. This policy has continued in Syria. And is now bordering on lunatic desperation, after Prince Bandar's false flag of Ghouta failed to provoke war on Syria, with the USA giving non-existent 'moderate' Jihadis radios to call in air strikes!!!
But what happens after the war on Syria?
Do the Jihadis move onto Iran as originally planned?
Or do they return to this Disunited Fascist Queendom and pose a threat to national security, thus providing the reason for giving MI5, MI6 and GCHQ even more powers, or legalising their abuses of current laws?
This is much more than just a pattern. This is a deliberate policy to encourage violent Islamic terrorism. Hopefully David Davis will take this further. But as we are only 2 months away from a General Election there could be a bit of electioneering going on.
No comments:
Post a Comment