Who is that presenter guy, Michael Usher, who states with absolute authority that MH17 was shot down from that field when no such claim can be made? All he has become is yet another Faustus mouthpiece of The Atlantic Council, repeating everything that Belling Cat say without looking at the bigger picture.
And here is a clue: Usher has spent years in the USA and the UK as the foreign correspondent for Nine Network, and he reported on the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan from those locations. Was he an 'embedded'?
And as for Yatsenyuk appearing at the start of the 'documentary' demanding that "those bastards be brought to the Hague" etc. It is Yats, recipient of NATO funds, hand-picked by Victoria Kagan-Nuland to be PM, who should be in the Hague!! He and his gang provoked a war in which 7000 civilians in East Ukraine opposing Nazism have been blown to bits by the Ukraine military, from the air or by artillery.
It's a pity Usher didn't do another 'documentary' on the origins of the war in Donbass: Nazis, sponsored and protected by NATO, ran a violent coup to oust a legitimately elected government.
IT'S THAT FUCKING SIMPLE!!
And in the resulting war how many civilians have been killed by the neo-Nazis? SEVEN THOUSAND!! We can safely assume a quarter of them children.
The civilians of East Ukraine recognised that coup and that it was executed by Nazis, and rebelled. Fifty of them paid the price in Odessa when pro-Kiev neo-Nazis burned them alive, the neo-Nazis shooting at those jumping from 2nd floor windows to escape the flames, and beating to death those who survived the jump.
At Christmas 2013 Ukraine was relatively stable, and there was no suggestion of a civil war. A protest was all it was. But then in February 2014 the neo-Nazis started shooting protestors and police from The Conservatory. This provoked the violent ousting of Yanukovich, who had irked the NATO powers by signing a deal with Russia instead of with the EU/IMF.
What followed was a rebellion by civilians of East Ukraine who resisted the imposition of Nazism by NATO. NATO cheered the neo-Nazis on as they burned people alive. NATO media beatified the neo-Nazis, either pretending not to notice the blatant Nazism or describing the violent Nazis as romantic revolutionaries (who burn people alive?).
And in the resulting war, in which NATO is supporting the Nazis while Russia is opposing the Nazis, seven thousand, repeat SEVEN THOUSAND, civilians have died at the hands of the Nazis, most bombed in their homes or in the street from the air by the Ukraine Air Force or shelled by the Ukraine Armed Forces artillery. And repeat, that's CIVILIANS, not military personnel. That's men, women and children opposing the imposition of Nazis by NATO onto Ukraine...BLOWN TO BITS...for opposing NATO Nazism!!
But let's get back to this 'documentary'. It is just blinkered Belling Cat with some dramatic music.
As I said, Yats makes a guest star appearance, almost with (fake Nazi) tears in his eyes as he demands that the perps of MH17 be dragged to the Hague (but not mentioning that he receives NATO funds and was hand-picked by Victoria Kagan-Nuland to become PM after the US/NATO-run coup). If Yats and his crew hadn't executed the coup then MH17 would probably be flying in the skies right now. But no. He and his wicked sponsors had to play geopolitics and give Putin a poke in the eye after Putin had denied the NATO powers their war on Syria in August 2013. It is the NATO powers who have unleashed the worst kind of international cutthroat Jihadis onto Syria, who have eventually morphed into Islamic State. And it is the US/NATO who ran the coup against Yanukovich. The biggest clue is that a former senior officer at the US Embassy Kiev, who managed USAID (CIA) funds but who somehow managed to lose those funds, is somehow now the Minister for Finance of Ukraine!! Her first action was to flog Ukraine to the IMF and Monsanto. And now Ukraine is making overtures to join NATO.
The documentary didn't look at any of the other possibilities, in particular ignoring the many eyewitnesses who saw a fighter jet. And this is important because a fighter jet may not have shot down MH17, but if fighter jets were in the area at the time then, assuming the separatists had a BUK, they may have deliberately provoked the separatists into shooting down MH17 by pretending to escort MH17 as if it were a UAF An26, or more nefariously trying to spoof the BUK radar into thinking that MH17 was a military plane. The Ukraine Air Force had been bombing civilians in Shnizhne the days before 17th July 2014.
And Usher also explicitly calls Russia liars but does not call Ukraine liars, which is just complete bias, because if Usher believes so strongly that MH17 was shot down from that field 5Km south of Shnizhne then he must also believe that the Ukraine Security Service are liars for putting out that tape which the SBU said proved 100% beyond doubt that Cossacks at Chernukino shot down MH17.
This 'documentary' was not journalism. It was propaganda.
And Usher's background as foreign corespondent based for years in the USA and UK, and his war reporting, suggests that he, like Roland Oliphant, might have other backgrounds.
No comments:
Post a Comment