WHY DID UKRAINE NOT SHUT DOWN ITS AIRSPACE?

Is the reason why Ukraine did not shut down its airspace money?

The Ukraine economy is now in big, big trouble. Ukraine could have been so much more stable and prosperous, if only the NATO and IMF powers hadn't backed neo-Nazis to overthrow Yanukovich who had agreed a huge deal with Russia...

Just as MH17 was falling out of the sky, Andrej Lysenko, the spokesman for the Ukraine Security Council, was holding a press conference, during which he said this:

[21:04] Question: On social networks, info is shared about BUK rockets, spotted near Snizhne. They are not Ukrainian ones. Can you comment on this?

Lysenko: We’ve got info, not only about this rocket system. We realize that it’s a very serious weapon and our Air Force and Intelligence will do their best to destroy these systems, so let’s wait and see. We have this information.

[21:41] Question: I would like you to clarify. So, can you confirm about this BUK, that it can hit airplanes ?

Lysenko: We’ve got information that some rockets complexes have passed into Ukraine territory, which can hit planes from high altitude. There was even a video how these BUK rockets drove through Luhansk. We know this.

[22:48] (Another question on another subject)

[23:18] Question: On social networks there is also information, that near Rozsypne, near Torez, maybe a Ukrainian plane was shot down.

Lysenko: When did this happen?

Question: The news appeared an hour ago, maybe less.

Lysenko: I can’t give an answer now, I have no information about this, but we will inform you later about the plane. All our fighter jets are operating, except yesterday’s case. Thanks for your attention.

[source : Re-examining the Luhansk video, What Happened to Flight MH17?, http://www.whathappenedtoflightmh17.com/re-examining-the-luhansk-video/]

So before MH17 was brought down, Ukraine knew the separatists had BUKs.

But more importantly they had a video of a BUK travelling through Luhansk!!

Let's just repeat that again.

Before MH17 was brought down, Ukraine knew the separatists had BUKs.

But more importantly they had a video of a BUK travelling through Luhansk!!

This is important because Ukraine released a video of a BUK with a missing missile travelling through Luhansk, but they said that it was filmed at 0500 on 18th July 2014, the day AFTER MH17. So is that video of the BUK referred to by Lysenko the same video that Belling Cat have constantly claimed shows the BUK that shot down MH17?

Have Belling Cat even asked Ukraine to see this video which Lysenko refers to? If not then why not?

But why did Ukraine not shut down its airspace?

If Ukraine knew for a fact that the separatists had missiles capable of shooting down civilian passenger planes at 33000 feet, why did Ukraine not shut down its airspace?

Why did the likes of British Airways stop flying over Ukraine while others like Malaysia Airlines continued to do so?

I would suggest it was because of money. The Kiev Nazis needed it to kill civilians in East Ukraine, and Malaysia Airlines needed to cut costs.

As in all crimes, you cannot just look at the crime itself. You must consider the circumstances and context of the crime. For example, if a wife kills her husband, did she simply commit a random act of murder, or was she bullied and raped by a violent husband and defended herself?

As we should all know by now, NATO used neo-Nazis to overthrow a legitimately elected government in order to install one of their puppets, Arseny Yatsenyuk. Yats runs a foundation called Open Ukraine, which is sponsored by:
The National Endowment for Democracy;
Chatham House;
The US Embassy in Kiev;
International Renaissance Foundation (George Soros);
and NATO.

Yats then packed his junta with the same violent neo-Nazis who had set Kiev on fire and chased out Yanukovich. Recognising the neo-Nazism of the junta, the citizens of East Ukraine rebelled, which was brutally put down by the the neo-Nazi junta through indiscriminate shelling from artillery, and bombing from military jets. Since the coup last year 7000 civilians of East Ukraine have been killed by the Kiev government. The junta was packed with neo-Nazis, but the people of Ukraine, when given the first opportunity, voted them out. However the neo-Nazis are gradually gaining more and more power, and working their way back into government.

But there has been another but softer coup in Kiev. A former senior employee at the US Embassy in Kiev called Natalie Jaresko was miraculously given Ukrainian citizenship just hours before she was made Ukraine Finance Minister. Jaresko had previously managed and 'lost' funds for the CIA and USAID, but instead of being prosecuted she has been promoted to her current position. What does that suggest? Unsurprisingly Ukraine's assets are now being flogged to the IMF and Monsanto. Jaresko had managed Horizon Capital which was founded with $150 million from USAID. Another of Yats' sponsors over at Open Ukraine is...Horizon Capital.

All this would likely not have happened if NATO, contrary to its founding principles, had not used militant nationalists to oust a legitimately elected government to install one of their puppets in order to poke Putin in the eye for him having stopped their war on Syria in 2013.

So if MH17 was indeed shot down by a BUK missile, how much responsibility do the NATO/IMF powers bear for causing the destabilisation in the first place that ultimately led to MH17 being brought down?

Just putting things into context...

PS who thinks that video that Lysenko referred to on 17th July 2014 is the one used by Ukraine and Belling Cat which is claimed to have been filmed at 0500 on 18th July 2014? It would make sense. Both were filmed in Luhansk, and Naida said the BUK that allegedly shot down MH17 was in Russia by 0200 on 18th July 2014.