PRIDE

I watched the film Pride last night which dramatises the relationship between a group of homosexuals in London and a village of Welsh miners during their strike 1984/5.

The film advances the NATO gay agenda.

The film is not about equals otherwise the film would have looked at why the miners were on strike and the effects it caused. Instead, the miners are portrayed as lazy just sitting in the club drinking and moaning.

One scene in the film which is definitely not required, which indicates that the film is advancing the NATO gay agenda, is set in the house of one of the homosexuals. Some of the miners' wives have gone to London to visit the homosexuals and they all go out and party in the gay pubs and clubs. The wives are in the bedroom of this gay house and start to see what they can find, and lo and behold, one of them finds a pink dildo under the bed. They all start laughing and giggling, asking each other, "What's this for?". Definitely not a necessary scene. Much more time could and should have been spent on the cause of the miners and why we are now being screwed by the energy companies, importing energy when we've got 200 years of the best coal in the world under our feet, and a demoralised work force with no fight who just go along with the agenda.

Why not dramatise Seamus Milne's The Enemy Within instead but refer to this relationship on an equal basis?

No.

Definitely advancing the NATO gay agenda.

Which is a shame because the underlying story is a good one of unifying.