SO WHY WAS THERE A CONFLICT IN EAST UKRAINE IN THE FIRST PLACE?

The Dutch Safety Board today stated that in their opinion Ukraine should have shut down the airspace over East Ukraine because of the conflict in that part of the country.

But why was there a conflict in East Ukraine in the first place?

It is because of Eliot Higgins' mates in the NATO/Atlantic Council axis-of-evil!!

A brief timeline is as follows:
1. Yanukovich had decided to sign a multi-billion dollar deal with Russia instead of with the EU/IMF;
2. this enraged the NATO powers, who had spent $5 billion trying to drag Ukraine into their sphere of influence and had reached an agreement at the NATO summit in April 2008 that Ukraine would eventually join NATO;
3. so contrary to their founding principles, they used violent nationalist extremists, Right Sector and Svoboda, in a violent coup to oust Yanukovich;
4. these neo-Nazis shot protestors and police to provoke riots and enrage the unwitting protestors;
5. Victoria Kagan-Nuland handpicked Arseny Yatsenyuk as the next leader, Yats being sponsored by NATO, National Endowment for Democracy, Chatham House and the US Embassy in Kiev, among others;
6. powerful positions in the resulting junta were then given to the violent neo-Nazis;
7. the east of Ukraine recognised this Nazism and rebelled against the junta;
8. the neo-Nazis in the junta then laid siege to East Ukraine, killing thousands of civilians with indiscriminate bombing and shelling;
9. and along the way, just to confirm that this was a US/NATO coup, somehow a former senior official at the US Embassy in Kiev, Natalie Jaresko, who had handled funds for US AID (CIA), became Finance Minister of Ukraine, and she immediately started to flog Ukraine to the likes of Monsanto.

So without this US/NATO coup there would have been no conflict in East Ukraine, and thus no MH17.

Simples.