WHAT WAS THE POINT OF BELLINGCAT'S LATEST REPORT?

Why not just name Muchkaev?

Instead there are lots and lots of blanked out faces, lots and lots of maybes, possiblys, likelys and "no direct evidence to support this conclusion", and very, very little, if any, new evidence.

But it does give NATO/Atlantic Council the opportunity to produce a flowchart of possible responsibility with the slayer of CIA-sponsored-terrorists, Vladimir Putin, at the top of the tree.

But I repeat: it is all maybe.

But it looks like they have given their sponsors (Soros through Toler's employment at Echonet and Higgins at The Atlantic Council) something to use.

And they may have possibly exposed themselves to claims of slander, or even possible danger.

We'll have to wait for the reactions from the boys of the 53rd Anti-Air Missile Brigade.