Pages

Wednesday, May 04, 2016

ON THE BBC CONSPIRACY FILES MH17 DOCUMENTARY

This was a reasonably balanced documentary, but huge questions were never addressed. These questions are:
1. why has the USA not released any photographic evidence it says it has?
2. why would so many witnesses claim they saw fighter jets in the vicinity yet only one witness (Valentina Kovolenko) says she saw a missile?
3. what are Bellingcat's financial sources, what are the links of their financial sources to the CIA and Wall Street, who is funding Higgins' PhD at Kings College, what strings were pulled to allow him onto that programme when he doesn't even have a degree in any subject never mind in war studies, and who will have IPR on that PhD?
4. why have NATO intelligence relied on a former office clerk watching videos all day to accuse Russia? Were NATO intelligence too busy allowing Jihadis to move between Europe and Syria?
5. was the Luhansk BUK video which was claimed to have been filmed on the morning of 18th July actually filmed earlier, and is it the video that Lysenko referred to in his press conference which was held just as MH17 was falling out of the sky?
6. what ever happened to the claims made by Der Spiegel and Correectiv that a missile was fired from north of Shnizhne (a report made in collaboration with Bellingcat) and not south as claimed by Bellingcat?
7. have the Ukraine Air Force released their flight logs for the 17th July 2014? If not, then why not?

Some doubts can be had about the photographer of the alleged trail: it sounds like he is a spy for Ukraine (at 30:10 the documentary claims he was given movements of rebel units).

No comments:

Post a Comment