Remember the Mariupol Maternity Hospital? How the NATO Nazis claimed that Russia bombed it during airtsrikes? How several mothers and mothers-to-be were photographed close to death?
Well, one of those mothers, perhaps the most well known of them, has gone on record in a filmed interview to destroy the NATO Nazi claim. And guess what! THERE WAS NO AIRSTRIKE! The hospital was being used by the NATO Nazis as a base of operations.
There can be no argument that Russia has invaded Ukraine. But there is a brutal propaganda war running in parallel, and as with any allegation critical thinking is required: did the NATO Nazis bomb the empty Mariupol theatre? Did the NATO Nazis fire a shell close to the Mariupol Maternity Hospital and be there cameras at the ready to claim Russia did it? And why did it take days for allegations of Russian atrocities in Bucha to emerge when any atrocities could have easily been commited by the NATO Nazis a day or so ago?
So why did Russia invade Ukraine?
To commit war crime after war crime?
Or was it to bring the NATO Nazis to the discussion table to force them to abide by the Minsk I and II Agreements and stop the NATO-engineered de facto civil war in which the NATO installed Nazi government started war on the Russophile east Ukraine?
New witness testimony about Mariupol maternity hospital ‘airstrike’ follows pattern of Ukrainian deceptions, media malpractice@KitKlarenberg on the unraveling of another propaganda piece that highlights the AP's unsavory relationship with Azovhttps://t.co/PZ77TbWupT
— The Grayzone (@TheGrayzoneNews) April 4, 2022
No comments:
Post a Comment