This drama shown on BBC 1 last night was very good. It did not address some of the more damning evidence indicating The Lusitania was left as a moving target for the German U-boats to sink in order to bring the USA into World War 1, but it did hint/suggest that, and with some evidence too. The drama showed how Churchill would have welcomed the sinking of The Lusitania, particularly with American passengers on board, including children. Also shown was that The Lusitania was an armed auxilliary cruiser registered with the British Admiralty, and was at the time of her sinking illegally carrying lots of ammunition, and was thus a legitimate target. It is arguable that the U-boat captain was an idiot for not realising the consequences of sinking The Lusitania, but it appears he was acting under orders.
The drama was perhaps a bit too emotional rather than factual, but I would not complain much if similar dramas of a factually accurate nature were shown more often on subjects such as the true origin of WW1, and the creation of Nazi Germany by Wall Street.
The sinking of The Lusitania did not bring the USA immediately into WW1, but it was used to grind down the Amercian public time and time again, so that nearly two years later Woodrow Wilson sent American troops to Europe. But perhaps more importantly, after formal declaration of war the USA could then legally loan desperately needed billions of dollars to the Allies from The Federal Reserve. Virtually none of it left the shores of America and most of it went straight into the pockets of Rothschild agent JP Morgan, who was the sole war time agent for the Allies in America.
Rothschild giveth, and Rothschild taketh away.
Monday, May 28, 2007
EXCUSE ME SIR, COULD WE ASK YOU A QUESTION?
Two dumb cops are walking down the street, and see someone they suspect may be a terrorist.
Dumb Cop #1: Excuse me, sir. Could we ask you a question?
man: Yes, officer.
Dumb Cop #2: We watched you walking down the street a few minutes ago and you looked very suspicious to us.
(concerned) man: Why? What was I doing?
Dumb Cop #1: Well, sir. You stopped to talk to somebody for a minute, and it looked to us like it was a planned meeting rather than a casual unplanned meeting. Who was he? Are you hiding something in your plastic carrier bag?
(now very concerned) man: It was a complete stranger, asking me what the time was, and for some spare change for a cup of tea. And no, I am not hiding something in my bag. It is some carrots, a broccoli and some chicken breast.
Dumb Cop #2: Put the bag down, sir, very carefully and step away from it towards that doorway, please.
(nervous) man: Officer, please stop this ridiculous questioning. I have not done, and do not intend to do, anything wrong, illegal or even suspicious. Now, can I go home to see my elderly mother for whom I am cooking dinner?
Dumb Cop #1: No sir. We have reason to suspect that you do not have a broccoli in your bag. Please put the bag down, and move away.
[Dumb Cop #2 now reaches for his taser]
man: Aw, c'mon. This is rid...
[Dumb Cop #2 then fires his taser at the man. The man then falls to the ground in great pain, but still clutching his plastic carrier bag containing the suspicious broccoli].
man: Aaaaagh!!!
Dumb Cop #1: [shouting] Put the bag down! Release the fucking bag, NOW!
[Dumb cop #1 then fires his taser at the already convulsing man]
man: AAAAAAAAGHHHHH!!!!...
[after a few seconds the man stops convulsing and lies motionless on the ground. A broccoli rolls out of the plastic carrier bag]
(now dead) man: [silence]
Dumb Cop #2: Oh no. Not again. Why can't people just behave normally? We are only trying to protect them.
Dumb Cop #1: Ah well. That's one less of 'em to question!
[Dumb Cop #1 then kicks the broccoli back into the plastic carrier bag and with a wry smile requests an ambulance over his radio].
=============================================================
As with the microchip implant, this is where we are heading. Very nervous, trigger happy police using non-lethal weapons to terrorise the general population over something as simple as a fresh, organic broccoli.
By the way, was the man a troublsome conspiracy theorist who saw through the false-flag state-sponsored terrorism? And were the cops really dumb cops?
Dumb Cop #1: Excuse me, sir. Could we ask you a question?
man: Yes, officer.
Dumb Cop #2: We watched you walking down the street a few minutes ago and you looked very suspicious to us.
(concerned) man: Why? What was I doing?
Dumb Cop #1: Well, sir. You stopped to talk to somebody for a minute, and it looked to us like it was a planned meeting rather than a casual unplanned meeting. Who was he? Are you hiding something in your plastic carrier bag?
(now very concerned) man: It was a complete stranger, asking me what the time was, and for some spare change for a cup of tea. And no, I am not hiding something in my bag. It is some carrots, a broccoli and some chicken breast.
Dumb Cop #2: Put the bag down, sir, very carefully and step away from it towards that doorway, please.
(nervous) man: Officer, please stop this ridiculous questioning. I have not done, and do not intend to do, anything wrong, illegal or even suspicious. Now, can I go home to see my elderly mother for whom I am cooking dinner?
Dumb Cop #1: No sir. We have reason to suspect that you do not have a broccoli in your bag. Please put the bag down, and move away.
[Dumb Cop #2 now reaches for his taser]
man: Aw, c'mon. This is rid...
[Dumb Cop #2 then fires his taser at the man. The man then falls to the ground in great pain, but still clutching his plastic carrier bag containing the suspicious broccoli].
man: Aaaaagh!!!
Dumb Cop #1: [shouting] Put the bag down! Release the fucking bag, NOW!
[Dumb cop #1 then fires his taser at the already convulsing man]
man: AAAAAAAAGHHHHH!!!!...
[after a few seconds the man stops convulsing and lies motionless on the ground. A broccoli rolls out of the plastic carrier bag]
(now dead) man: [silence]
Dumb Cop #2: Oh no. Not again. Why can't people just behave normally? We are only trying to protect them.
Dumb Cop #1: Ah well. That's one less of 'em to question!
[Dumb Cop #1 then kicks the broccoli back into the plastic carrier bag and with a wry smile requests an ambulance over his radio].
=============================================================
As with the microchip implant, this is where we are heading. Very nervous, trigger happy police using non-lethal weapons to terrorise the general population over something as simple as a fresh, organic broccoli.
By the way, was the man a troublsome conspiracy theorist who saw through the false-flag state-sponsored terrorism? And were the cops really dumb cops?
Thursday, May 17, 2007
HOW DO YOU CELEBRATE ILLUMINATI DAY? SHOW PORN TO KIDS!!
1st May is Illuminati Day.
How should such a tremendous day for humanity be celebrated? With fetes and street parties? With a charity sack race of celebrities?
No.
The Illuminati don't do sack races.
They show porn to kids.
=====================================
From http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=55713
On May 1, some thousands of New Jersey children were sadistically violated by Comcast's screening of pornography on the Disney Playhouse cable channel.
How many thousands of innocent 3 to 6-year-old children were traumatized by the close-up groans and grinds of pornography in place of "Handy Manny"?
...Disney is pedophile-friendly at the highest echelons, brazenly hiring convicted pedophiles like Victor Salva to write and direct sexualized child films like "Powder."
Salva served 15 months for sodomizing at least one 12-year-old boy who had acted in Salva's first teen horror film, "Clownhouse." Entertainment Weekly reported that in "Powder," Salva has a male teacher stroke the boy's head and tell the child he's "never had better sex" since being touched by the lad.
Disney kept this and other sexualized child scenes in "Powder" and warned no one of Salva's criminal pedophile history. One press critic noted, "The movie studio participated in the secrecy and the cycle of abuse."
In fact, Salva joined another well-paid Disney predatory "talent." Larry Clark, infamous for his naked photographs of young boys, directed "Kids" (1995) in graphic sex, violence and drug use. Ted Baehr's Movieguide notes that this child-abusive film was so deviant that Disney distributed it under the Miramax label.
Newsweek said "The art-movie company Miramax has paid $3.5 million to distribute 'Kids' worldwide. Unfortunately, Miramax is owned by the Walt Disney Co. … The movie is called 'Kids,' but you'd better leave yours at home. New York photographer Larry Clark, known for his raw images of adolescent sexuality, has just debuted his first film at the Sundance Film Festival."
==========================================
This is what is in control of America. Can you not see it yet?
How should such a tremendous day for humanity be celebrated? With fetes and street parties? With a charity sack race of celebrities?
No.
The Illuminati don't do sack races.
They show porn to kids.
=====================================
From http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=55713
On May 1, some thousands of New Jersey children were sadistically violated by Comcast's screening of pornography on the Disney Playhouse cable channel.
How many thousands of innocent 3 to 6-year-old children were traumatized by the close-up groans and grinds of pornography in place of "Handy Manny"?
...Disney is pedophile-friendly at the highest echelons, brazenly hiring convicted pedophiles like Victor Salva to write and direct sexualized child films like "Powder."
Salva served 15 months for sodomizing at least one 12-year-old boy who had acted in Salva's first teen horror film, "Clownhouse." Entertainment Weekly reported that in "Powder," Salva has a male teacher stroke the boy's head and tell the child he's "never had better sex" since being touched by the lad.
Disney kept this and other sexualized child scenes in "Powder" and warned no one of Salva's criminal pedophile history. One press critic noted, "The movie studio participated in the secrecy and the cycle of abuse."
In fact, Salva joined another well-paid Disney predatory "talent." Larry Clark, infamous for his naked photographs of young boys, directed "Kids" (1995) in graphic sex, violence and drug use. Ted Baehr's Movieguide notes that this child-abusive film was so deviant that Disney distributed it under the Miramax label.
Newsweek said "The art-movie company Miramax has paid $3.5 million to distribute 'Kids' worldwide. Unfortunately, Miramax is owned by the Walt Disney Co. … The movie is called 'Kids,' but you'd better leave yours at home. New York photographer Larry Clark, known for his raw images of adolescent sexuality, has just debuted his first film at the Sundance Film Festival."
==========================================
This is what is in control of America. Can you not see it yet?
MADELEINE AND THE MICROCHIP AGENDA : I TOLD YOU!!
Yesterday The Times ran an article entitled, "Would an implanted chip help to keep my child safe?"
available to read at
http://women.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/women/families/article1788169.ece
It was tucked away in the Women section so I missed this, but Propaganda Matrix has highlighted it.
Also yesterday, many if not all Westminster MPs wore yellow ribbons to signal their sympathy with missing Madeleine.
And it is perhaps the most dangerous scientist (outside of the underground bases), Professor Kevin Warwick, who The Times reports is receiving queries from parents about them 'chipping their children.
The Times article refers to several tagging products on the market, but then destroys their security with this paragraph;
"The drawback with all these products, of course, is that an abductor could quickly dispose of mobile phones, satchels, clothing or wristbands. Wherify, an American company, offers a GPS locator watch that it claims is lockable and tamper-proof and may act as a visible deterrent (it works only in America). However, some parents may be uncomfortable about a highly visible device that an abductor would be desperate to remove."
Michelle Elliot from Kidscape is quoted thus;
"We have 11 million children in the UK,” says Elliot. “For the past 25 years between five and seven children have been abducted and killed by a stranger each year, and that has not changed...Are we becoming paranoid to the point where we give children the message that life is so dangerous that they have to be tagged? There is no guarantee of your child’s safety. But the chances [of something like this happening] are so remote that you have to think about the message you’re giving them."
5 children a year abducted by strangers?
7 children a year killed by strangers?
How many children will die today due to extreme poverty and/or easily-treated diseases? (clue : one dies every 3 seconds).
And then Warwick spouts his science to enhance the credibility of the microchip implant;
"But Professor Warwick says that if there was sufficient demand from the public and the initiative was backed by child-safety groups, it would not be difficult to make chip implants – about an inch long – available nationally in a relatively short period of time...He says that further work may be needed to determine how best to recharge the device but, because it would be in “sleep mode”, it would need only very low power. “It might be that once a year the child has to hold his arm up to a charger,” he says."
The man is a buffoon, lost in scienceland, and needs a REAL education, like most people in the world. He is actually working towards constructing his own prison which he will be happy to pass down to his children and grandchildren, and one which we will inherit.
The transparency is nauseating.
available to read at
http://women.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/women/families/article1788169.ece
It was tucked away in the Women section so I missed this, but Propaganda Matrix has highlighted it.
Also yesterday, many if not all Westminster MPs wore yellow ribbons to signal their sympathy with missing Madeleine.
And it is perhaps the most dangerous scientist (outside of the underground bases), Professor Kevin Warwick, who The Times reports is receiving queries from parents about them 'chipping their children.
The Times article refers to several tagging products on the market, but then destroys their security with this paragraph;
"The drawback with all these products, of course, is that an abductor could quickly dispose of mobile phones, satchels, clothing or wristbands. Wherify, an American company, offers a GPS locator watch that it claims is lockable and tamper-proof and may act as a visible deterrent (it works only in America). However, some parents may be uncomfortable about a highly visible device that an abductor would be desperate to remove."
Michelle Elliot from Kidscape is quoted thus;
"We have 11 million children in the UK,” says Elliot. “For the past 25 years between five and seven children have been abducted and killed by a stranger each year, and that has not changed...Are we becoming paranoid to the point where we give children the message that life is so dangerous that they have to be tagged? There is no guarantee of your child’s safety. But the chances [of something like this happening] are so remote that you have to think about the message you’re giving them."
5 children a year abducted by strangers?
7 children a year killed by strangers?
How many children will die today due to extreme poverty and/or easily-treated diseases? (clue : one dies every 3 seconds).
And then Warwick spouts his science to enhance the credibility of the microchip implant;
"But Professor Warwick says that if there was sufficient demand from the public and the initiative was backed by child-safety groups, it would not be difficult to make chip implants – about an inch long – available nationally in a relatively short period of time...He says that further work may be needed to determine how best to recharge the device but, because it would be in “sleep mode”, it would need only very low power. “It might be that once a year the child has to hold his arm up to a charger,” he says."
The man is a buffoon, lost in scienceland, and needs a REAL education, like most people in the world. He is actually working towards constructing his own prison which he will be happy to pass down to his children and grandchildren, and one which we will inherit.
The transparency is nauseating.
Wednesday, May 16, 2007
THE 7/7 COVER-UP CONTINUES
Shortly after the succesful prosecutions of Khyam and four others in Operation Crevice some interesting information leaked out about who knew what and when regarding the London 7/7 bombs. The media was full of accusations and the public were becoming restless; did MI5 know the bombers and of the plot, or not?
Just as these questions were being discussed in every Post Office, Public House and Whore House across the nation, the news was broken that a young 3 year old girl had been abducted on Algarve. This news was accompanied by the interesting news that the widow of the alleged ringleader of 7/7 had been arrested along with three men.
She was released yesterday, and her release was mentioned only in passing by a handful of media, despite the fanfare afforded to her arrest.
About the same time she was released the news was broken that a Briton in a love triangle had been questioned and his computer and videos seized for investigation, despite him having an alibi that he was with his mother at the time Madeleine is suspected of being abducted, and he strongly protests his innocence.
So, when the public are becoming alerted to the possibility that its Security Service knew more than it let on about 7/7 there are two stories given the spotlight; a young girl is abducted and subsequently a man with an alibi is prime suspect, and the widow of the 7/7 manager MSK is arrested and released without charge at the same time that an apparently unlikely prime suspect is found in the abduction of Madeleine.
Hmm.
On Madeleine, this morning on BBC Radio 5 Live Richard Bacon's debate was about what makes us so concerned about Madeleine. Plenty of people phoned in and said it's a parents worst nightmare etc. But some scpetics also pointed to the seriously biased coverage when by now thousands of children will have died from poverty and easily-treated diseases. But they don't matter because they're black and thousands of miles away...
We really are an easy bunch to manipulate, aren't we? That's why it's so important to them that we don't have a free press. The USA resisted the greatest fraud ever foisted upon mankind for over 100 years, The Federal Reserve, until the bankers had bought enough of the media and could manipulate public opinion with lies, spin, etc.
They'll have us working towards and paying for our own slavery next! Ooops, I forgot. They're doing that already...
Just as these questions were being discussed in every Post Office, Public House and Whore House across the nation, the news was broken that a young 3 year old girl had been abducted on Algarve. This news was accompanied by the interesting news that the widow of the alleged ringleader of 7/7 had been arrested along with three men.
She was released yesterday, and her release was mentioned only in passing by a handful of media, despite the fanfare afforded to her arrest.
About the same time she was released the news was broken that a Briton in a love triangle had been questioned and his computer and videos seized for investigation, despite him having an alibi that he was with his mother at the time Madeleine is suspected of being abducted, and he strongly protests his innocence.
So, when the public are becoming alerted to the possibility that its Security Service knew more than it let on about 7/7 there are two stories given the spotlight; a young girl is abducted and subsequently a man with an alibi is prime suspect, and the widow of the 7/7 manager MSK is arrested and released without charge at the same time that an apparently unlikely prime suspect is found in the abduction of Madeleine.
Hmm.
On Madeleine, this morning on BBC Radio 5 Live Richard Bacon's debate was about what makes us so concerned about Madeleine. Plenty of people phoned in and said it's a parents worst nightmare etc. But some scpetics also pointed to the seriously biased coverage when by now thousands of children will have died from poverty and easily-treated diseases. But they don't matter because they're black and thousands of miles away...
We really are an easy bunch to manipulate, aren't we? That's why it's so important to them that we don't have a free press. The USA resisted the greatest fraud ever foisted upon mankind for over 100 years, The Federal Reserve, until the bankers had bought enough of the media and could manipulate public opinion with lies, spin, etc.
They'll have us working towards and paying for our own slavery next! Ooops, I forgot. They're doing that already...
Saturday, May 12, 2007
MADELEINE AND THE MICROCHIP AGENDA
It's missing Madeleine McCann's birthday today.
She was abducted last week in Portugal.
I have to express my suspicion about this abduction. Its timing was immaculate. Great Britain was beginning to see what it's intelligence agency The Security Service really gets up to following the revelations that it had the alleged bombers of 7/7 photographed, and had told lies to and withheld evidence from the ISC. It was also revealed that an inmate of Belmarsh had overheard the Crevice plotters discussing a plan to bomb the London transport network and when informed of this the cops shrugged their shoulders as if to say, "we know, but waddya gonna do?".
At the moment there is a potential she was abducted by a trio either from Great Britain or with significant links to Great Britain.
And it is this link to Great Britain which makes me suspicious.
Madeleine's abduction quashed any further interest in Crevice and 7/7. That story was removed from the front pages and replaced by Madeleine. Who could not be distressed at the abduction of a three year old girl while her parents were out eating? Even David Beckham is getting involved.
But due to my understanding of how this world really works I am suspicious and sceptical about the media coverage. Yes, it is very sad that a little girl was abducted and I do hope she is found alive and well and unabused and that her abductors are caught and dealt with.
But how many little children are on the verge of death from starvation or from easily treated diseases due to the economic policies of the people who control our money supply and engineer, finance and profit greatly from world wars? Once a year on Red Nose Day the cupboards of the media are opened and the dust blown off the video tape containing images of African children with flies in their mouths and eyes and we all donate a tenner and then the tapes are put back in their cupboards never to be seen again until next Red Nose Day. Not once is the question addressed, "what are the consequences of world bank, IMF policies and what is the history of those institutions?". Remember the Make Poverty History advert in which wealthy celebrities clicked their fingers every three seconds indicating that a child dies from extreme poverty every three seconds?
A few weeks after Holly Wells and Jessica Chapman went missing reports began to appear that a number of parents wanted their children to be microchipped. BBC, CNN, etc all ran virtually the same story (for that's all it was) putting a positive spin on the idea.
I predict the same will happen again very soon. The abduction of a 3 year old girl is a newsworthy story. But why so much coverage of Madeleine while hundreds of children around the world have died from starvation and easily treated diseases since Madeleine's abduction.
There is only one answer; the microchip. 24/7 coverage of an abducted girl while hundreds of children secretly die unnecessary deaths hidden from our view amongst the flies and the dust.
WHY? To create in the public a feeling of "Something must be done. How can we find Madeleine?".
Is it any significance that our judicial system is lenient on paedophiles?
Is it so they avoid or are given ridiculously short custodial sentences and can then prowl the streets terrifying parents in to 'chipping their children?
I would not laugh this suggestion off so quickly. Most people have no idea what our leaders have done and discuss far from the sycophantic media. Paedophilia is to me the sickest of crimes, and deserves to be punished not by allowing them onto our streets but by locking them away. So why is our judicial system so soft on them?
While paedophiles are on the streets kids are abducted. It's that simple. And with the abductions comes the media blitz encouraging the microchip agenda. One follows the other as night follows day.
I do hope Madeleine is found well and unharmed. But let's not use this one incident to push the microchip agenda, when the paedophiles who abduct children should be in prison and not prowling the streets, and extreme poverty is killing a child every three seconds.
She was abducted last week in Portugal.
I have to express my suspicion about this abduction. Its timing was immaculate. Great Britain was beginning to see what it's intelligence agency The Security Service really gets up to following the revelations that it had the alleged bombers of 7/7 photographed, and had told lies to and withheld evidence from the ISC. It was also revealed that an inmate of Belmarsh had overheard the Crevice plotters discussing a plan to bomb the London transport network and when informed of this the cops shrugged their shoulders as if to say, "we know, but waddya gonna do?".
At the moment there is a potential she was abducted by a trio either from Great Britain or with significant links to Great Britain.
And it is this link to Great Britain which makes me suspicious.
Madeleine's abduction quashed any further interest in Crevice and 7/7. That story was removed from the front pages and replaced by Madeleine. Who could not be distressed at the abduction of a three year old girl while her parents were out eating? Even David Beckham is getting involved.
But due to my understanding of how this world really works I am suspicious and sceptical about the media coverage. Yes, it is very sad that a little girl was abducted and I do hope she is found alive and well and unabused and that her abductors are caught and dealt with.
But how many little children are on the verge of death from starvation or from easily treated diseases due to the economic policies of the people who control our money supply and engineer, finance and profit greatly from world wars? Once a year on Red Nose Day the cupboards of the media are opened and the dust blown off the video tape containing images of African children with flies in their mouths and eyes and we all donate a tenner and then the tapes are put back in their cupboards never to be seen again until next Red Nose Day. Not once is the question addressed, "what are the consequences of world bank, IMF policies and what is the history of those institutions?". Remember the Make Poverty History advert in which wealthy celebrities clicked their fingers every three seconds indicating that a child dies from extreme poverty every three seconds?
A few weeks after Holly Wells and Jessica Chapman went missing reports began to appear that a number of parents wanted their children to be microchipped. BBC, CNN, etc all ran virtually the same story (for that's all it was) putting a positive spin on the idea.
I predict the same will happen again very soon. The abduction of a 3 year old girl is a newsworthy story. But why so much coverage of Madeleine while hundreds of children around the world have died from starvation and easily treated diseases since Madeleine's abduction.
There is only one answer; the microchip. 24/7 coverage of an abducted girl while hundreds of children secretly die unnecessary deaths hidden from our view amongst the flies and the dust.
WHY? To create in the public a feeling of "Something must be done. How can we find Madeleine?".
Is it any significance that our judicial system is lenient on paedophiles?
Is it so they avoid or are given ridiculously short custodial sentences and can then prowl the streets terrifying parents in to 'chipping their children?
I would not laugh this suggestion off so quickly. Most people have no idea what our leaders have done and discuss far from the sycophantic media. Paedophilia is to me the sickest of crimes, and deserves to be punished not by allowing them onto our streets but by locking them away. So why is our judicial system so soft on them?
While paedophiles are on the streets kids are abducted. It's that simple. And with the abductions comes the media blitz encouraging the microchip agenda. One follows the other as night follows day.
I do hope Madeleine is found well and unharmed. But let's not use this one incident to push the microchip agenda, when the paedophiles who abduct children should be in prison and not prowling the streets, and extreme poverty is killing a child every three seconds.
Friday, May 11, 2007
27th JUNE CAN'T COME SOON ENOUGH
Iraq.
Afghanistan.
Serbia.
And soon Iran.
All in the name of freedom and democracy? No. All in the name of WAR, PROFIT, OIL AND GAS.
Regarding Iraq;
we were told the oil was going to be placed in a trust for the Iraqis. It is now to be dished out to Anglo-American oil companies by a committee packed with Anglo-American oil men.
He ignored the advice which was that Islamic terror in Great Britain would increase as a result of invading Iraq. And he still refuses to grant an independent public inquiry into the largest terror attack on mainland Britain. Why? His excuse is that it would distract us from the war on terror which he propagates, and continues to propagate by flying around the world promoting the war on terror and promoting the war on terror in the journal of the Council on Foreign Relations!
The gap between rich and poor has widened and we are all in much more debt, despite the minimum wage.
And still our money supply is in the hands of the same families who engineered, financed and profited greatly from World Wars 1 and 2 and are now increasingly desperate for a World War 3 which will give them total control of the world so our children won't be able to find out how they have come to live in such an unfair, sick world.
Blair was put into Number 10 by those warmongers. He has served them well. The media, owned by the same warmongering families who control our money supply, is generally sycophantic, and those that aren't are landing very feeble punches.
This man is a traitor. Not quite a traitor to the human race like those he ultimately serves in The City of London and Wall Street, but one of his last acts for "his" country is to sign us up to greater European intergration without us voting on it.
1 out of 10, and the 1 is for Northern Ireland, which may or may not last, and out of my cynicism may well be part of the agenda.
The Guardian's headline reads; 'I did what I thought was right'
It should read; 'I did what I thought was right [for the agenda]'
Afghanistan.
Serbia.
And soon Iran.
All in the name of freedom and democracy? No. All in the name of WAR, PROFIT, OIL AND GAS.
Regarding Iraq;
we were told the oil was going to be placed in a trust for the Iraqis. It is now to be dished out to Anglo-American oil companies by a committee packed with Anglo-American oil men.
He ignored the advice which was that Islamic terror in Great Britain would increase as a result of invading Iraq. And he still refuses to grant an independent public inquiry into the largest terror attack on mainland Britain. Why? His excuse is that it would distract us from the war on terror which he propagates, and continues to propagate by flying around the world promoting the war on terror and promoting the war on terror in the journal of the Council on Foreign Relations!
The gap between rich and poor has widened and we are all in much more debt, despite the minimum wage.
And still our money supply is in the hands of the same families who engineered, financed and profited greatly from World Wars 1 and 2 and are now increasingly desperate for a World War 3 which will give them total control of the world so our children won't be able to find out how they have come to live in such an unfair, sick world.
Blair was put into Number 10 by those warmongers. He has served them well. The media, owned by the same warmongering families who control our money supply, is generally sycophantic, and those that aren't are landing very feeble punches.
This man is a traitor. Not quite a traitor to the human race like those he ultimately serves in The City of London and Wall Street, but one of his last acts for "his" country is to sign us up to greater European intergration without us voting on it.
1 out of 10, and the 1 is for Northern Ireland, which may or may not last, and out of my cynicism may well be part of the agenda.
The Guardian's headline reads; 'I did what I thought was right'
It should read; 'I did what I thought was right [for the agenda]'
Thursday, May 10, 2007
THE DEATH OF CASH
Earlier this week it was announced that a new scheme is to be launched which will drastically reduce the requirement for cash. The scheme is called Contactless and will involve a new piece of plastic electronically connected to a credit or debit card but can be used for small transactions such as buying a pint of milk at your local corner shop.
But what this scheme is really about is burying cash in a grave.
Why?
Because the banking system demands that electronic money cannot be repaid in cash.
Why?
Because the banks don't have it!!
The cash reserves of banks have been dwindling and becoming smaller and smaller in comparison to the amount of money in circulation.
If we were all to go to our banks today and demand withdrawing all our savings in cash the banks would close.
THEY DON'T HAVE THE CASH!
IT IS ALL A LOAD OF BOLLOCKS!!
They loan you the money for your mortgage. They don't have that money in cash. It is simply typed into a computer and you are in debt to hundreds of thousands of pounds. But they will take you to court for recovery and demand repayment in solid physical assets.
So cash is not good for them, for while we still use cash there is still the possibility that we all demand our savings in cash, and when the banks are found out that they can't fulfill that demand they will lose their power because they will be out of business. Hence the "kill cash" movement.
NB in the following article note how the idea is posed as a wonderful revolution. But also how it will operate; you will hold the card close to a reader. This is how the implantable microchip will operate when it is eventually used for financial transactions (besides the every millisecond tracking and other nefarious unknown possibilities).
================================
From http://money.guardian.co.uk/saving/banks/story/0,,2074949,00.html
Smartcard heralds cashfree era
Ed Ewing
Tuesday May 8, 2007
Guardian Unlimited
The days of struggling to find the right change were declared over today as Britain's banks announced the next generation of cash smartcards.
"Contactless credit and debit cards" will be launched in London this autumn, with a nationwide rollout to follow in 2008. The "tap and go" cards will allow users to make minor purchases without having to swipe their cards or enter a Pin number.
Announcing the new technology, the UK payments association, Apacs, said: "Contactless technology will be available for transactions of £10 or under. Customers will simply hold their upgraded card up to a secure reader to make their payment in participating retailers, outlets and vending machines."
But what this scheme is really about is burying cash in a grave.
Why?
Because the banking system demands that electronic money cannot be repaid in cash.
Why?
Because the banks don't have it!!
The cash reserves of banks have been dwindling and becoming smaller and smaller in comparison to the amount of money in circulation.
If we were all to go to our banks today and demand withdrawing all our savings in cash the banks would close.
THEY DON'T HAVE THE CASH!
IT IS ALL A LOAD OF BOLLOCKS!!
They loan you the money for your mortgage. They don't have that money in cash. It is simply typed into a computer and you are in debt to hundreds of thousands of pounds. But they will take you to court for recovery and demand repayment in solid physical assets.
So cash is not good for them, for while we still use cash there is still the possibility that we all demand our savings in cash, and when the banks are found out that they can't fulfill that demand they will lose their power because they will be out of business. Hence the "kill cash" movement.
NB in the following article note how the idea is posed as a wonderful revolution. But also how it will operate; you will hold the card close to a reader. This is how the implantable microchip will operate when it is eventually used for financial transactions (besides the every millisecond tracking and other nefarious unknown possibilities).
================================
From http://money.guardian.co.uk/saving/banks/story/0,,2074949,00.html
Smartcard heralds cashfree era
Ed Ewing
Tuesday May 8, 2007
Guardian Unlimited
The days of struggling to find the right change were declared over today as Britain's banks announced the next generation of cash smartcards.
"Contactless credit and debit cards" will be launched in London this autumn, with a nationwide rollout to follow in 2008. The "tap and go" cards will allow users to make minor purchases without having to swipe their cards or enter a Pin number.
Announcing the new technology, the UK payments association, Apacs, said: "Contactless technology will be available for transactions of £10 or under. Customers will simply hold their upgraded card up to a secure reader to make their payment in participating retailers, outlets and vending machines."
SATANIST LIVES IN THE WHITE HOUSE?
Check out this recent photograph of Bush with our Queen (or should that be Kveen).
Is he making this sign?
Or this?
He should feel right at home with that inverted, irregular and incomplete pentagram outside his house.
Wednesday, May 09, 2007
THE HYPOCRISY OF DEMOCRACY IN AMERICA
It looks like Ron Paul is being shiftily and quietly eliminated from the candidacy race. They went to war in Iraq to install freedom and democracy, didn't they?
====================
From http://www.propagandamatrix.com/articles/may2007/080507yahoocensor.htm
Now Yahoo! Censor Popular Support For Ron Paul
ABC forced to address Texas Congressman's campaign, but remain silent on why they scrubbed him from online poll
Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Tuesday, May 8, 2007
Yahoo! News have become the latest establishment media outlet to ignore and censor Ron Paul's presidential campaign, despite the fact that he won Thursday night's GOP debate hands down, according to an overwhelming majority that voted for him in online polls.
Yahoo! News' 2008 Presidential election coverage page features a list of candidates from both Democrat and Republican parties, but fails to list Ron Paul, despite the fact that he easily trounced the likes of Sam Brownback, Mike Huckabee and Duncan Hunter - who are featured, in every online poll since Thursday's debate.
MySpace users are also claiming that bulletins expressing support for Ron Paul are being blocked and that prominent supporters of Paul's campaign are having their accounts suspended.
ABC News were swamped with furious e mails and calls over the weekend after they deliberately scrubbed Ron Paul from their online poll, ensuring no one could vote for him. After he was reinstated, the Congressman received thousands of votes and won the poll at a canter.
In a simpering puff piece released last night, ABC News correspondent Rick Klein claims that Paul's popularity is not reflected nationwide and is merely the result of "viral marketing" on behalf of the Congressman's online supporters.
Apologists for the establishment press have tried to argue that popular support for Ron Paul is skewed by activist voting, but the fact remains that Paul had topped the MSNBC online vote before it had even been widely publicized, as Keith Olbermann stated during live coverage of the debate.
If we accept this to be the case are we to then assume that Giuliani, Romney and the other gaggle of shill candidates don't have any online support? If so, who is going to vote for them? Do Giuliani and McCain supporters not have access to the Internet?
Klein also erroneously claims that Paul's online votes in the MSNBC poll were artificially inflated because users were voting multiple times. This isn't possible, since the website only affords one vote to one IP address - there is no option to vote again if you have already voted. Klein obviously didn't even bother to check whether his statement was correct before including it in the article.
The fact that ABC deliberately tried to censor Paul by not including him in the original poll is not addressed in the article.
What we are witnessing is a deliberate effort to poo-poo Ron Paul's chances to ensure that he has no chance - this is a chicken and egg scenario. If Ron Paul was afforded as much coverage as Giuliani and Romney he would have a real shot of becoming President - but the military-industrial complex that owns the media are loathe to allow that because Paul is a true anti-war Jeffersonian paleoconservative and he represents the people.
We couldn't possibly have a President that represented the people now could we! Only a compromised slimeball shill pre-approved and selected by the anointed ones and their mouthpiece hacks in the corporate media.
====================
From http://www.propagandamatrix.com/articles/may2007/080507yahoocensor.htm
Now Yahoo! Censor Popular Support For Ron Paul
ABC forced to address Texas Congressman's campaign, but remain silent on why they scrubbed him from online poll
Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Tuesday, May 8, 2007
Yahoo! News have become the latest establishment media outlet to ignore and censor Ron Paul's presidential campaign, despite the fact that he won Thursday night's GOP debate hands down, according to an overwhelming majority that voted for him in online polls.
Yahoo! News' 2008 Presidential election coverage page features a list of candidates from both Democrat and Republican parties, but fails to list Ron Paul, despite the fact that he easily trounced the likes of Sam Brownback, Mike Huckabee and Duncan Hunter - who are featured, in every online poll since Thursday's debate.
MySpace users are also claiming that bulletins expressing support for Ron Paul are being blocked and that prominent supporters of Paul's campaign are having their accounts suspended.
ABC News were swamped with furious e mails and calls over the weekend after they deliberately scrubbed Ron Paul from their online poll, ensuring no one could vote for him. After he was reinstated, the Congressman received thousands of votes and won the poll at a canter.
In a simpering puff piece released last night, ABC News correspondent Rick Klein claims that Paul's popularity is not reflected nationwide and is merely the result of "viral marketing" on behalf of the Congressman's online supporters.
Apologists for the establishment press have tried to argue that popular support for Ron Paul is skewed by activist voting, but the fact remains that Paul had topped the MSNBC online vote before it had even been widely publicized, as Keith Olbermann stated during live coverage of the debate.
If we accept this to be the case are we to then assume that Giuliani, Romney and the other gaggle of shill candidates don't have any online support? If so, who is going to vote for them? Do Giuliani and McCain supporters not have access to the Internet?
Klein also erroneously claims that Paul's online votes in the MSNBC poll were artificially inflated because users were voting multiple times. This isn't possible, since the website only affords one vote to one IP address - there is no option to vote again if you have already voted. Klein obviously didn't even bother to check whether his statement was correct before including it in the article.
The fact that ABC deliberately tried to censor Paul by not including him in the original poll is not addressed in the article.
What we are witnessing is a deliberate effort to poo-poo Ron Paul's chances to ensure that he has no chance - this is a chicken and egg scenario. If Ron Paul was afforded as much coverage as Giuliani and Romney he would have a real shot of becoming President - but the military-industrial complex that owns the media are loathe to allow that because Paul is a true anti-war Jeffersonian paleoconservative and he represents the people.
We couldn't possibly have a President that represented the people now could we! Only a compromised slimeball shill pre-approved and selected by the anointed ones and their mouthpiece hacks in the corporate media.
Friday, May 04, 2007
IT'S ALL A LOAD OF BOLLOCKS, INNIT?
For the past month or so my letterbox has been full of flyers from this, that and the other party about how they managed to get a small item of graffiti removed or the local library to stay open an extra hour a week.
You can vote this party in, or that party in, but what do you get in return? More war resulting in more centralised control and more debt resulting in more taxes.
WHEN WILL PEOPLE WAKE UP!!
Nothing will ever change as long as the bankers can create virtually unlimited amounts of money for themselves and their megalomaniac schemes at will!
The London Marathon was on the other weekend. All those people training for many hours a week, expending all that energy just to load up again and run it all off again. The satanists who run this planet must be laughing their heads off. Ssh. Listen. Can you hear them laughing their heads off as they create another billion or two pounds for an arms manufacturer? All that energy expended for what?
I have some respect for people who can train for a marathon for charity. I tried but came to realise the energy is better spent on other things. The same goes for local councillors.
But as long as the bankers have the power to create money they will abuse that power and create war and famine and destitution and genocide and all the bad things in life.
Sear this qoute into your brain. Repeat it often to your children and grandchildren, for it is they who will inherit what we leave them:
"Banking was conceived in iniquity and was born in sin. The bankers own the earth. Take it away from them, but leave them the power to create money, and with the flick of the pen they will create enough deposits to buy it back again. However, take it away from them, and all the great fortunes like mine will disappear and they ought to disappear, for this would be a happier and better world to live in. But, if you wish to remain the slaves of bankers and pay the cost of your own slavery, let them continue to create money ."
Lord Josiah Stamp, Director of the Bank of England.
You can vote this party in, or that party in, but what do you get in return? More war resulting in more centralised control and more debt resulting in more taxes.
WHEN WILL PEOPLE WAKE UP!!
Nothing will ever change as long as the bankers can create virtually unlimited amounts of money for themselves and their megalomaniac schemes at will!
The London Marathon was on the other weekend. All those people training for many hours a week, expending all that energy just to load up again and run it all off again. The satanists who run this planet must be laughing their heads off. Ssh. Listen. Can you hear them laughing their heads off as they create another billion or two pounds for an arms manufacturer? All that energy expended for what?
I have some respect for people who can train for a marathon for charity. I tried but came to realise the energy is better spent on other things. The same goes for local councillors.
But as long as the bankers have the power to create money they will abuse that power and create war and famine and destitution and genocide and all the bad things in life.
Sear this qoute into your brain. Repeat it often to your children and grandchildren, for it is they who will inherit what we leave them:
"Banking was conceived in iniquity and was born in sin. The bankers own the earth. Take it away from them, but leave them the power to create money, and with the flick of the pen they will create enough deposits to buy it back again. However, take it away from them, and all the great fortunes like mine will disappear and they ought to disappear, for this would be a happier and better world to live in. But, if you wish to remain the slaves of bankers and pay the cost of your own slavery, let them continue to create money ."
Lord Josiah Stamp, Director of the Bank of England.
Wednesday, May 02, 2007
JULY 7th 2005 : THEY KNEW!!
The Sun has an explosive story on 7/7 on something I didn't know about until today, and something which should accelerate the calls of a public inquiry in to 7/7. A prisoner in Belmarsh with Kyham and the others while they were on remand overheard them talking about a big attack on the London Underground and a bus! He then told his solicitor who forwarded the information onto "a senior figure in the anti-terror squad" who seemed to know of the plot.
NB note the indifference and apathy in the last comment from Scotland Yard. There could have been only a small finite number of people in Belmarsh at anyone time and it would not have been hard to find out who it was (that is if they really, really wanted to).
==================================================
From http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2007200266,00.html
By JAMES CLENCH
and TOM WELLS
May 02, 2007
COMMENT ON THIS STORY
A LAG told last night how he alerted cops after hearing a terror gang discuss the 7/7 bombings — four months before the attack.
But NOTHING was done about his tip that fellow prisoners knew “something that would hurt London” was about to happen.
Soon after suicide bombers DID attack the capital’s transport system, killing 52 people and injuring hundreds more on Tube trains and buses.
The chilling revelations came as victims and relatives of those caught in the attack on July 7, 2005, demanded an inquiry into claims it could have been averted.
The source said: “I knew months before 7/7 that plans were in place by a serious group of people to bomb London’s transport network.
“I told my solicitors and they told the police — then nothing happened after that.”
...The lag, who we cannot name for fear of reprisals, passed his information to Karen Todner, a partner at London-based legal firm Kaim Todner.
She said: “We were given specific information by one of our clients. He said he overheard other prisoners talking about bombing the Underground system and a bus travelling from King’s Cross towards Parliament.
“He never told us who the people were — I’m not sure if he knew. I passed the information on to a senior figure at the anti-terror squad about four months before the atrocity took place.
“I had the impression they were well aware of these plans — they didn’t sound greatly shocked.
“They never contacted me again. I was horrified when the attack was carried out.”
Last night Scotland Yard’s counter terrorism command confirmed: “We received information from a third party about an overheard conversation. The information was of a general nature.
“The third party was unable to provide IDs of those involved.
“On that basis, we were unable to take the matter further.”
NB note the indifference and apathy in the last comment from Scotland Yard. There could have been only a small finite number of people in Belmarsh at anyone time and it would not have been hard to find out who it was (that is if they really, really wanted to).
==================================================
From http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2007200266,00.html
By JAMES CLENCH
and TOM WELLS
May 02, 2007
COMMENT ON THIS STORY
A LAG told last night how he alerted cops after hearing a terror gang discuss the 7/7 bombings — four months before the attack.
But NOTHING was done about his tip that fellow prisoners knew “something that would hurt London” was about to happen.
Soon after suicide bombers DID attack the capital’s transport system, killing 52 people and injuring hundreds more on Tube trains and buses.
The chilling revelations came as victims and relatives of those caught in the attack on July 7, 2005, demanded an inquiry into claims it could have been averted.
The source said: “I knew months before 7/7 that plans were in place by a serious group of people to bomb London’s transport network.
“I told my solicitors and they told the police — then nothing happened after that.”
...The lag, who we cannot name for fear of reprisals, passed his information to Karen Todner, a partner at London-based legal firm Kaim Todner.
She said: “We were given specific information by one of our clients. He said he overheard other prisoners talking about bombing the Underground system and a bus travelling from King’s Cross towards Parliament.
“He never told us who the people were — I’m not sure if he knew. I passed the information on to a senior figure at the anti-terror squad about four months before the atrocity took place.
“I had the impression they were well aware of these plans — they didn’t sound greatly shocked.
“They never contacted me again. I was horrified when the attack was carried out.”
Last night Scotland Yard’s counter terrorism command confirmed: “We received information from a third party about an overheard conversation. The information was of a general nature.
“The third party was unable to provide IDs of those involved.
“On that basis, we were unable to take the matter further.”
Tuesday, May 01, 2007
HAPPY ILLUMINATI DAY!!
It was this day in 1776 which saw the creation of The Illuminati. In case you think they are a figment of some paranoid conspiraloon's imagination the government of Bavaria came across some of their documents and began an investigation into The Illuminati. In 1786 the Bavarian authorities published a booklet on their findings on The Illuminati called "Einige Originalschriften des Illuminaten Ordens", and warned governments that the Illuminati were intent on taking control of the world through what is now called Communism.
Following the investigation The Illuminati were banned and went on the run. They found sanctuary in the House of Saxe-Gotha, now more commonly known as Windsor, who were before their name change known as Saxe-Gotha-Coburg.
==============================
From http://www.royal.gov.uk/output/Page128.asp
The name Saxe-Coburg-Gotha came to the British Royal Family in 1840 with the marriage of Queen Victoria to Prince Albert, son of Ernst, Duke of Saxe-Coburg & Gotha. Queen Victoria herself remained a member of the House of Hanover.
The only British monarch of the House of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha was King Edward VII, who reigned for nine years at the beginning of the modern age in the early years of the twentieth century.
King George V replaced the German-sounding title with that of Windsor during the First World War. The name Saxe-Coburg-Gotha survived in other European monarchies, including the current Belgian Royal Family and the former monarchies of Portugal and Bulgaria.
================================
Edward VII was the Grand Master of the United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE) when he was isolating Germany in preparation for WW1. It was Edward's son George V who changed the name to Windsor during the same WW1 which his father engineered. There were several attempts at instigating a Communist revolution in Russia during the reigns of this father and son, culminating in the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution financed and protected by Great Britain and the USA, which by then was under British control due to the Federal Reserve.
Following the investigation The Illuminati were banned and went on the run. They found sanctuary in the House of Saxe-Gotha, now more commonly known as Windsor, who were before their name change known as Saxe-Gotha-Coburg.
==============================
From http://www.royal.gov.uk/output/Page128.asp
The name Saxe-Coburg-Gotha came to the British Royal Family in 1840 with the marriage of Queen Victoria to Prince Albert, son of Ernst, Duke of Saxe-Coburg & Gotha. Queen Victoria herself remained a member of the House of Hanover.
The only British monarch of the House of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha was King Edward VII, who reigned for nine years at the beginning of the modern age in the early years of the twentieth century.
King George V replaced the German-sounding title with that of Windsor during the First World War. The name Saxe-Coburg-Gotha survived in other European monarchies, including the current Belgian Royal Family and the former monarchies of Portugal and Bulgaria.
================================
Edward VII was the Grand Master of the United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE) when he was isolating Germany in preparation for WW1. It was Edward's son George V who changed the name to Windsor during the same WW1 which his father engineered. There were several attempts at instigating a Communist revolution in Russia during the reigns of this father and son, culminating in the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution financed and protected by Great Britain and the USA, which by then was under British control due to the Federal Reserve.