I think I had this on a very floppy red vynil but lost it. At the time I thought it was fantastic, but now 30 years later knowing the true manipulation and lies that brought WW1 and WW2 and possibly WW3 about...
We definitely need an alternative Remembrance Day.
Remembrance Day by B Movie (1981)
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EIXGKN2iZOE]
In the forest, in the snow
All those many years ago
Pale stones and epitaphs
Mourning bells and half-mast flags
In the cemetery where they fell
All those many years ago
And now it's just a memory
Eroded by the years
Forgotten heroes underground
Wrinkled faces gather round
Pale stones and epitaphs
Roses on a barbed wire fence
Winter landscapes never change
Oh it must have been the same
In the forest, in the snow
All those many years ago
Remembrance Day
All they have is memories
From photographs in silver frames
Upon the mantelpiece
Remembrance Day
Lost forever in the fields
Of foreign lands
Many miles away
In the forest, in the snow
All those many years ago
Bombed-out victims blown sky high
Buried where they lie
A generation underground
Wrinkled faces gather round
Songs will never bring them back
Never bring them back
Wednesday, October 31, 2012
THAT COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF MOMENT
The Bilderberg Washington Post is calling the aftermath of Sandy a "Commander-in-Chief moment", stating
The WP appears to me to favour Obama, with more comments in favour of Obama and against Romney than t'other way around.
Romney does appear to have pulled ahead slightly. The Drudge Report showed some polls putting Romney approaching 10 points ahead. But there are now whispers of postponing the election; it is possible but unlikely...for now. Initial estimates of getting New York's transport and comms networks dried out and running again were initially set for the weekend. Obama has released government funds to several states affected by Sandy.
So I return to this report in Press TV about Obama and Dempsey and a few others threatening to go public on 9/11.
This report was published AFTER the incident in Benghazi. I have noticed that nearly all articles I have read about that incident accusing Obama have not mentioned the film that caused outrage across the Arab world, as if it had never happened. Several have stated that Ambassador Stevens had written on the growth of al Qaeda and affiliates in Libya. Perhaps he was threatening to go public on this and was silenced but a smokescreen was required hence the film to provoke riots and an attack that killed Stevens. The Press TV report was published AFTER Benghazi. But when was the author of the report told about the threat of Obama etc going public on 9/11? Before or after Benghazi? In other words, did Obama say he was 'considering' going public on 9/11 only AFTER Benghazi?
Maybe Sandy was designed to cause much more devastation and make Obama look incompetent, but the technology available is not yet powerful enough to create such storms, in North East USA anyway.
But at the moment, Sandy is proving useful to Obama.
For a day at least, Hurricane Sandy appears to have done for President Obama what he has not been able to do for himself.
In a campaign notable mostly for its negativity, the historic storm provided Obama with a commander-in-chief moment a week before Election Day. The president gained a rare moment of bipartisan praise, with Democratic and Republican governors alike commending the performance of the federal government. And the storm put on pause, for now, the sense that rival Mitt Romney had all the momentum in the home stretch.
[source : Storm provides Obama with a commander-in-chief moment, WP, http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/decision2012/storm-provides-obama-with-a-commander-in-chief-moment/2012/10/30/5e645952-22c2-11e2-ac85-e669876c6a24_story.html?hpid=z2, 31/10/2012
The WP appears to me to favour Obama, with more comments in favour of Obama and against Romney than t'other way around.
Romney does appear to have pulled ahead slightly. The Drudge Report showed some polls putting Romney approaching 10 points ahead. But there are now whispers of postponing the election; it is possible but unlikely...for now. Initial estimates of getting New York's transport and comms networks dried out and running again were initially set for the weekend. Obama has released government funds to several states affected by Sandy.
So I return to this report in Press TV about Obama and Dempsey and a few others threatening to go public on 9/11.
Some of the same high-level sources who point to Richard Clarke as the US boss of the Israeli-instigated 9/11 false flag operation also claim that President Obama, Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Gen. Dempsey, and other powerful Americans are considering exposing the truth about 9/11 during a second Obama term. In other words, Obama's re-election could put Israel out of business, and get Netanyahu hanged from the nearest lamp-post.
[source : Israel seeks war on Iran to keep lid on 9/11, PressTV, http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2012/09/20/262683/israel-seeks-iran-war-to-keep-lid-on-911/, 21/09/2012]
This report was published AFTER the incident in Benghazi. I have noticed that nearly all articles I have read about that incident accusing Obama have not mentioned the film that caused outrage across the Arab world, as if it had never happened. Several have stated that Ambassador Stevens had written on the growth of al Qaeda and affiliates in Libya. Perhaps he was threatening to go public on this and was silenced but a smokescreen was required hence the film to provoke riots and an attack that killed Stevens. The Press TV report was published AFTER Benghazi. But when was the author of the report told about the threat of Obama etc going public on 9/11? Before or after Benghazi? In other words, did Obama say he was 'considering' going public on 9/11 only AFTER Benghazi?
Maybe Sandy was designed to cause much more devastation and make Obama look incompetent, but the technology available is not yet powerful enough to create such storms, in North East USA anyway.
But at the moment, Sandy is proving useful to Obama.
Tuesday, October 30, 2012
WHY SANDY WAS HYPED
If you are wondering what ever happened to the elite paedo abuse story surrounding Jimmy Savile, a large storm was allowed to hit the North East of the USA. Sky News have been covering the storm relentlessly, and the BBC did their bit too, but what did the storm do eventually? Some damage, some deaths, some flooding, some snow and some rain, but not the predicted total devastation, as some media are saying.
But last week the elite paedo abuse story accelerated significantly when an MP alleged the existence of a paedo ring in Downing Street. And it was also alleged by a former child actor that a senior Bilderberg member of the government took liberties with him during filming for The Cook Report.
Two of the main power centres in this DFQ are Downing Street, for political power, and the BBC, for media power. That allegations of paedo abuse in these power centres are being made and investigated says a lot.
And it backs up what Dr Richard Day predicted in 1969, that a "anything goes" attitude towards sex would be promoted.
But it is much, much worse than this. There is widespread torture and murder of children in the name of Satan/Saturn. It is Halloween tomorrow. Do not enjoy it. I never did.
================================
From http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/view/279380/TORY-PAEDO-COVER-UP/
TORY PAEDO COVER-UP
DAILY STAR SUNDAY
28th October 2012
By Jonathan Corke, Tony Bushby and Deborah Sherwood
POLICE probing an underage sex ring at the heart of Maggie Thatcher’s government were warned: “Stop investigating if you want to keep your jobs.”
Officers in London were inquiring into allegations made by a teenage rent boy that a Cabinet minister had been abusing him.
The youth claimed to be one of a number of boys regularly having sex with rich and powerful men in the 1980s – some of whom would fly to the illegal orgies from Europe.
As well as the Cabinet minister – who is still alive – he pointed the finger at judges, European bigwigs and senior civil servants.
He told his story to detectives, who are understood to have received other allegations against the minister.
But a former detective who worked on the case revealed they were suddenly told to halt the probe.
But last week the elite paedo abuse story accelerated significantly when an MP alleged the existence of a paedo ring in Downing Street. And it was also alleged by a former child actor that a senior Bilderberg member of the government took liberties with him during filming for The Cook Report.
Two of the main power centres in this DFQ are Downing Street, for political power, and the BBC, for media power. That allegations of paedo abuse in these power centres are being made and investigated says a lot.
And it backs up what Dr Richard Day predicted in 1969, that a "anything goes" attitude towards sex would be promoted.
But it is much, much worse than this. There is widespread torture and murder of children in the name of Satan/Saturn. It is Halloween tomorrow. Do not enjoy it. I never did.
================================
From http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/view/279380/TORY-PAEDO-COVER-UP/
TORY PAEDO COVER-UP
DAILY STAR SUNDAY
28th October 2012
By Jonathan Corke, Tony Bushby and Deborah Sherwood
POLICE probing an underage sex ring at the heart of Maggie Thatcher’s government were warned: “Stop investigating if you want to keep your jobs.”
Officers in London were inquiring into allegations made by a teenage rent boy that a Cabinet minister had been abusing him.
The youth claimed to be one of a number of boys regularly having sex with rich and powerful men in the 1980s – some of whom would fly to the illegal orgies from Europe.
As well as the Cabinet minister – who is still alive – he pointed the finger at judges, European bigwigs and senior civil servants.
He told his story to detectives, who are understood to have received other allegations against the minister.
But a former detective who worked on the case revealed they were suddenly told to halt the probe.
SANDY HAS CAUSED SOME CARNAGE BUT OBAMA NOT BEING BLAMED OR PRAISED
I can only speak from viewing UK TV. Sky News is reporting on little else but Sandy, while the BBC is covering other news. Some parts of New York are flooded, a few people have died, a few feet of snow in the hills, and millions without power.
But there are no accusations being made over lack or warnings or unpreparedness...not yet anyway.
But there are also no songs of praise either...not yet anyway.
Perhaps it is too early for this.
But so far Sandy has been bad, but it could have been worse. The media were hyping it up yesterday.
But one thing has disappeared from the TV news; Jimmy Savile.
On BBC Radio 5 Live yesterday the Your Call debate with Nicky Campbell was on Savile and I detected the BBC were trying to put a few spins on the story, such as it is now getting boring having dominated the news for weeks now, and allegations of sexual abuse everywhere make all men look bad, etc. So to see that 'Savile' has now disappeared from the headlines should not come as a surprise, considering that our leaders are kiddie-fiddlers and that an MP alleged the existence of a paedophile ring in Downing Street!
But there are no accusations being made over lack or warnings or unpreparedness...not yet anyway.
But there are also no songs of praise either...not yet anyway.
Perhaps it is too early for this.
But so far Sandy has been bad, but it could have been worse. The media were hyping it up yesterday.
But one thing has disappeared from the TV news; Jimmy Savile.
On BBC Radio 5 Live yesterday the Your Call debate with Nicky Campbell was on Savile and I detected the BBC were trying to put a few spins on the story, such as it is now getting boring having dominated the news for weeks now, and allegations of sexual abuse everywhere make all men look bad, etc. So to see that 'Savile' has now disappeared from the headlines should not come as a surprise, considering that our leaders are kiddie-fiddlers and that an MP alleged the existence of a paedophile ring in Downing Street!
Monday, October 29, 2012
SANDY IS A FALSE FLAG BUT BY WHOM
Yes, there have been hurricanes that have hit New York.
Yes, they have done damage.
But Sandy, and the weather systems it is interacting with, look very dangerous.
Besides the potential for the obvious flood and power line damage there is also the potential for damage to anything related to nuclear power. All it could take is one nuclear facility, and by that I do not necessarily mean power plant, and shit could happen...or appear to happen.
I watched Sky News UK this afternoon and within a less than one hour there was massive difference in the behaviour of the sea it was showing, from an unsettled behaviour to one of obvious violence, but the storm was not expected to hit that area for hours!
'Experts' said that despite the distance the storm had travelled that it had accumulated more energy due to unusually warm seas, and were surprised that it had not been drawn more out to sea.
This storm, despite previous storms that have hit the NY area, does look very very suspicious.
The question is, who will it favour.
Yes, they have done damage.
But Sandy, and the weather systems it is interacting with, look very dangerous.
Besides the potential for the obvious flood and power line damage there is also the potential for damage to anything related to nuclear power. All it could take is one nuclear facility, and by that I do not necessarily mean power plant, and shit could happen...or appear to happen.
I watched Sky News UK this afternoon and within a less than one hour there was massive difference in the behaviour of the sea it was showing, from an unsettled behaviour to one of obvious violence, but the storm was not expected to hit that area for hours!
'Experts' said that despite the distance the storm had travelled that it had accumulated more energy due to unusually warm seas, and were surprised that it had not been drawn more out to sea.
This storm, despite previous storms that have hit the NY area, does look very very suspicious.
The question is, who will it favour.
WHERE IS ROMNEY? WHERE IS BLAIR? WHERE IS THE WEATHER CONTROL SYSTEM?
I haven't seen Romney on UK TV yet. Obama has been on a few times saying the same thing, that the US government is prepared.
Which made me think that this storm could play either way. It could make Obama the great leader at a time of a national emergency. Or if the result is total devastation then Obama looks the incompetent clown.
Blair was reported to be Obama's campaign manager. Where is he now?
And where are the weather control systems? Can they be monitored real-time to show their manipulation?
Which made me think that this storm could play either way. It could make Obama the great leader at a time of a national emergency. Or if the result is total devastation then Obama looks the incompetent clown.
Blair was reported to be Obama's campaign manager. Where is he now?
And where are the weather control systems? Can they be monitored real-time to show their manipulation?
Sunday, October 28, 2012
DOCTOR RICHARD DAY
Yesterday David Icke tried to show that everything that Doctor Richard Day stated in a speech in 1969 said would happen has happened or is happening. Day was National Medical Director of the Rockefeller-sponsored "Planned Parenthood". The speech was recalled by Dr Lawrence Dunegan and this recollection can be found at http://www.overlordsofchaos.com/html/new_order_of_barbarians.html
Stuff that Day stated would happen is
1. abortion would become normal
2. so would euthanasia (see latest news about The Liverpool Care Pathway in the UK and death panels in the USA)
3. sex not for reproduction, children produced in labs and only to those deemed worthy, and limited to 2 unless the parents were considered exceptional in which case they would be permitted more than 2 children
4. homosexuality promoted
5. the family unit destroyed
6. owning private property discouraged and in most cases unaffordable
7. education,
a. more time spent in schools but less learned
b. schools more of a community service
c. access to information strictly controlled
d. books would disappear
8. alcohol and drug abuse would be encouraged
9. medical aid restricted
Day mentioned much much more, like accepting the UN, falsified scientific research (and Icke pointed out the global man-made warming bollocks was exactly that), American heavy industry would be exported to destroy the USA but this would be presented as "saving the planet", and could have ranted on for hours more but was limited for time.
But regarding terrorism, apparently terror would occur in Europe, and only in the USA if the USA was not conforming to the plan.
Now this is of great interest to me because I am a strong believer in the plan for three world wars requiring the creation of Israel. It is possible that this plan has been Plan B and only implemented as a last resort due to the risk involved of actually losing a fight. However, Dunegan claimed,
So, is this Middle East confrontation scripted and everyone knows their lines?
Was 9/11 done (by Israel) because the USA was not conforming to the plan divulged by Day?
And is the whole sordid story of the war and regime change in seven nations in five years designed to trick and/or persuade us into accepting this plan otherwise the nukes will be lobbed because "they mean business"?
I can find no mention by Day of Israel, but perhaps if he had ranted on for longer then he would have divulged the bloody purpose of Israel.
It would make sense to go softly, softly, but have a back up if the plan falls behind schedule. A lot of what Day stated would happen has happened so the plan has been successful to some degree.
But if it has fallen behind schedule so much that they had to do 9/11 then what does that tell us?
And 9/11 was ELEVEN years ago!!
And Syria is kicking al Qaeda butt, spoiling the war and regime change plan.
And still no world government.
Oh dear.
Deary, deary me.
Tut. Tut. Tut.
Stuff that Day stated would happen is
1. abortion would become normal
2. so would euthanasia (see latest news about The Liverpool Care Pathway in the UK and death panels in the USA)
3. sex not for reproduction, children produced in labs and only to those deemed worthy, and limited to 2 unless the parents were considered exceptional in which case they would be permitted more than 2 children
4. homosexuality promoted
5. the family unit destroyed
6. owning private property discouraged and in most cases unaffordable
7. education,
a. more time spent in schools but less learned
b. schools more of a community service
c. access to information strictly controlled
d. books would disappear
8. alcohol and drug abuse would be encouraged
9. medical aid restricted
Day mentioned much much more, like accepting the UN, falsified scientific research (and Icke pointed out the global man-made warming bollocks was exactly that), American heavy industry would be exported to destroy the USA but this would be presented as "saving the planet", and could have ranted on for hours more but was limited for time.
But regarding terrorism, apparently terror would occur in Europe, and only in the USA if the USA was not conforming to the plan.
Now this is of great interest to me because I am a strong believer in the plan for three world wars requiring the creation of Israel. It is possible that this plan has been Plan B and only implemented as a last resort due to the risk involved of actually losing a fight. However, Dunegan claimed,
Anyhow, the new system would be brought in, if not by peaceful cooperation -everybody willingly yielding national sovereignty- then by bringing the nation to the brink of nuclear war. And everybody would be so fearful as hysteria is created by the possibility of nuclear war that there would be a strong public outcry to negotiate a public peace and people would willingly give up national sovereignty in order to achieve peace, and thereby this would bring in the New International Political System. This was stated and very impressive thing to hear then:
"If there were too many people in the right places who resisted this, there might be a need to use one or two -possibly more- nuclear weapons. As it was put this would be possibly needed to convince people that 'We mean business'."
That was followed by the statement that:
"By the time one or two of those went off then everybody – even the most reluctant – would yield."
He said something about "this negotiated peace would be very convincing," as kind of in a framework or in a context that the whole thing was rehearsed but nobody would know it. People hearing about it would be convinced that it was a genuine negotiation between hostile enemies who finally had come to the realization that peace was better than war.
So, is this Middle East confrontation scripted and everyone knows their lines?
Was 9/11 done (by Israel) because the USA was not conforming to the plan divulged by Day?
And is the whole sordid story of the war and regime change in seven nations in five years designed to trick and/or persuade us into accepting this plan otherwise the nukes will be lobbed because "they mean business"?
I can find no mention by Day of Israel, but perhaps if he had ranted on for longer then he would have divulged the bloody purpose of Israel.
It would make sense to go softly, softly, but have a back up if the plan falls behind schedule. A lot of what Day stated would happen has happened so the plan has been successful to some degree.
But if it has fallen behind schedule so much that they had to do 9/11 then what does that tell us?
And 9/11 was ELEVEN years ago!!
And Syria is kicking al Qaeda butt, spoiling the war and regime change plan.
And still no world government.
Oh dear.
Deary, deary me.
Tut. Tut. Tut.
SANDY
Alex Jones is suggesting that Hurricane Sandy could be being manipulated, citing evidence that since the 1960s the USA and other nations have been able to manipulate hurricanes. This manipulation could be to engineer a natural disaster and national emergency in which Obama would appear as the great leader just before a very close Presidential election. Sandy could easily be steered away, but at the moment it appears it is not (see http://www.infowars.com/the-engineered-storm-of-the-century/). Another possibility would be to postpone the election due to the effects of the storm.
The timing of this storm and its path are very curious. But it is not unknown for such storms to hit the North East coast of the USA at this time of the year.
The wikipedia page lists almost 100 such storms affecting New York (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_New_York_hurricanes). The vast majority of these struck New York in August/September, but a significant minority struck in October.
Mayor Bloomberg has just been shown on Sky News giving a press conference ordering an evacuation of coastal areas due to predicted high surges. He showed some concern, suggesting that people store some food and water etc, just in case, but he was not too concerned, saying the storm should lose some strength, should not cause too much damage, and pass over in just a few hours. If Sandy was being manipulated to bring about a 'natural' disaster and national emergency then I would have expected a lot more panic in Bloomberg.
It would be interesting to get Piers Corbyn's take on this event.
All will be revealed over the next 48 hours.
The timing of this storm and its path are very curious. But it is not unknown for such storms to hit the North East coast of the USA at this time of the year.
The wikipedia page lists almost 100 such storms affecting New York (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_New_York_hurricanes). The vast majority of these struck New York in August/September, but a significant minority struck in October.
Mayor Bloomberg has just been shown on Sky News giving a press conference ordering an evacuation of coastal areas due to predicted high surges. He showed some concern, suggesting that people store some food and water etc, just in case, but he was not too concerned, saying the storm should lose some strength, should not cause too much damage, and pass over in just a few hours. If Sandy was being manipulated to bring about a 'natural' disaster and national emergency then I would have expected a lot more panic in Bloomberg.
It would be interesting to get Piers Corbyn's take on this event.
All will be revealed over the next 48 hours.
A VERY BRIEF SUMMARY OF DAVID ICKE'S TALK
1. The planet Saturn is broadcasting a strange frequency which is being amplified by our moon.
2. There are strange huge ships orbiting Saturn.
3. Satanism is Saturnism.
4. Our leaders are Satanists/Saturnists, kidnapping, abusing (physically and sexually), torturing and murdering children.
5. The human race has been genetically modified over the millenia to lock us into a particular frequency range that makes us more controllable and more disassociated from the universe than we used to be.
2. There are strange huge ships orbiting Saturn.
3. Satanism is Saturnism.
4. Our leaders are Satanists/Saturnists, kidnapping, abusing (physically and sexually), torturing and murdering children.
5. The human race has been genetically modified over the millenia to lock us into a particular frequency range that makes us more controllable and more disassociated from the universe than we used to be.
Saturday, October 27, 2012
SO, IS DAVID ICKE RIGHT OR WHAT?
Watching David Icke live over t'interweb?
If not then you should be...back in 40 minutes.
If not then you should be...back in 40 minutes.
Friday, October 26, 2012
THE LIVERPOOL CARE PATHWAY WAS, IS AND ALWAYS WILL BE FASCIST EUTHANASIA
The Daily Mail is reporting that UK hospitals are being paid by Commissioning for Quality and Innovation to place patients on the Liverpool Care Pathway. Commissioning for Quality and Innovation is an institute within the NHS. The NHS is run by the UK government, which bailed out the fascist bankers without prosecuting a single one of them for the most minor of crimes but did prosecute a 'rioter' last year for stealing one bottle of water.
If you want fascism, you've got it.
And you can find it in Whitehall. Write to fascism at
Also in Whitehall is The Cenotaph, where in just over two weeks time The National Service of Remembrance will take place. The service is supposed to commemorate the fallen who gave their lives in defence of this country against invasion by, for example, the Nazis and their genocidal policies.
But in the LCP it looks like we have failed to defend this country against invasion by at least one Nazi policy.
And that is because our rulers, besides being kiddie-fiddlers as the investigation into Jimmy Savile is revealing, are eugenicists, pure and simple. They started the eugenics societies. They supported Hitler in this. They financed research and policies in eugenics.
And they continue to do so through the LCP.
It must be stopped...IMMEDIATELY!
Lock up fascist bankers instead.
If you want fascism, you've got it.
And you can find it in Whitehall. Write to fascism at
Ministerial Correspondence and Public Enquiries Unit
Department of Health
Richmond House
79 Whitehall
London SW1A 2NS
Also in Whitehall is The Cenotaph, where in just over two weeks time The National Service of Remembrance will take place. The service is supposed to commemorate the fallen who gave their lives in defence of this country against invasion by, for example, the Nazis and their genocidal policies.
But in the LCP it looks like we have failed to defend this country against invasion by at least one Nazi policy.
And that is because our rulers, besides being kiddie-fiddlers as the investigation into Jimmy Savile is revealing, are eugenicists, pure and simple. They started the eugenics societies. They supported Hitler in this. They financed research and policies in eugenics.
And they continue to do so through the LCP.
It must be stopped...IMMEDIATELY!
Lock up fascist bankers instead.
Thursday, October 25, 2012
DOES ISRAELI ATTACK ON SUDAN SHOW THAT ISRAEL DID 9/11?
Shortly after 9/11 General Wesley Clark was told of a plan for war and regime change in seven nations in five years. That plan is now moribund.
Francesco Cossiga stated in November 2007 that most of the world's intel agencies know that Israel did 9/11.
So perhaps to give that plan a new edge did Israel attack Sudan?
Why would Israel attack Sudan?
Why would Israel want war and regime change in seven nations?
The seven nations named to Clark were
Iraq (2003, success)
Lebanon (2006, fail)
Libya (2011, success)
Syria (2011, failing)
Somalia is slowly and quietly being attacked via a European force.
There has been intrigue against Iran for decades (Operation Ajax, 1979 Revolution, Green Revolution) and a huge build up of US military hardware in the Persian Gulf concurrent with increasing threats from Israel.
And now Sudan?
Francesco Cossiga stated in November 2007 that most of the world's intel agencies know that Israel did 9/11.
So perhaps to give that plan a new edge did Israel attack Sudan?
Why would Israel attack Sudan?
Why would Israel want war and regime change in seven nations?
The seven nations named to Clark were
Iraq (2003, success)
Lebanon (2006, fail)
Libya (2011, success)
Syria (2011, failing)
Somalia is slowly and quietly being attacked via a European force.
There has been intrigue against Iran for decades (Operation Ajax, 1979 Revolution, Green Revolution) and a huge build up of US military hardware in the Persian Gulf concurrent with increasing threats from Israel.
And now Sudan?
Wednesday, October 24, 2012
ABBADABBADOO
What does a Swedish Fred Flintstone say?
Yabbadabbadooo...
No he says, Abbadabbadoo. That's what he says.
Yabbadabbadooo...
No he says, Abbadabbadoo. That's what he says.
CAN WE ASSUME THAT ANYTHING ANTI OBAMA IS MOSSAD?
Netanyahu, and thus the UK, and thus the Illuminati, want Romney in because he and Netanyahu go back a long time and Romney is much more likely to go to war on Syria and Iran and kick off WW3.
Now, maybe Obama has agreed to throw the election, to take a dive, which is why he was so lacklustre in the first TV debate, and he wasn't exactly shining in the last two TV debates either.
I don't know.
But I am detecting a lot of anti-Obama sentiment in virtually everything I see, hear and read.
A month or so ago I read perhaps the most astonishing and encouraging article that I have read for a long time. It was in Press TV and it stated that Obama, Dempsey and a few others are considering going public on 9/11.
Now that does not sound like someone who has decided to throw in the towel. It could be a subtle threat. If so then what does that tell us about the NWO? But it could also be that Obama was fishing for votes wherever he can, because the election looks to be very close and if he is genuinely trying to win the election then he will need every vote he can get, which would explain why the Romney camp have indulged in some voting machines.
I have not heard of Romney threatening to expose 9/11. All I hear from Romney is "Fascist austerity and war for Israel is good for America!"
So I am going to assume that virtually every anti Obama piece I read has Mossad's fingers all over it.
Obama ain't no saint. But if the NWO want him out then he should be kept in.
Now, maybe Obama has agreed to throw the election, to take a dive, which is why he was so lacklustre in the first TV debate, and he wasn't exactly shining in the last two TV debates either.
I don't know.
But I am detecting a lot of anti-Obama sentiment in virtually everything I see, hear and read.
A month or so ago I read perhaps the most astonishing and encouraging article that I have read for a long time. It was in Press TV and it stated that Obama, Dempsey and a few others are considering going public on 9/11.
Some of the same high-level sources who point to Richard Clarke as the US boss of the Israeli-instigated 9/11 false flag operation also claim that President Obama, Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Gen. Dempsey, and other powerful Americans are considering exposing the truth about 9/11 during a second Obama term. In other words, Obama's re-election could put Israel out of business, and get Netanyahu hanged from the nearest lamp-post.
[source : Israel seeks war on Iran to keep lid on 9/11, PressTV, http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2012/09/20/262683/israel-seeks-iran-war-to-keep-lid-on-911/, 21/09/2012]
Now that does not sound like someone who has decided to throw in the towel. It could be a subtle threat. If so then what does that tell us about the NWO? But it could also be that Obama was fishing for votes wherever he can, because the election looks to be very close and if he is genuinely trying to win the election then he will need every vote he can get, which would explain why the Romney camp have indulged in some voting machines.
I have not heard of Romney threatening to expose 9/11. All I hear from Romney is "Fascist austerity and war for Israel is good for America!"
So I am going to assume that virtually every anti Obama piece I read has Mossad's fingers all over it.
Obama ain't no saint. But if the NWO want him out then he should be kept in.
Sunday, October 21, 2012
AN ALTERNATIVE REMEMBRANCE SUNDAY
We need one.
This year Remembrance Sunday will take place on 11th November, three weeks from today.
As usual there will be the usual suspects laying wreathes in memory of the fallen, while creating terror and war in North Africa and the Middle East in order to advance an agenda for what is looking more and more like the third and final world war of a series of planned world wars that have so far been successful, otherwise we would not be having Remembrance Sunday.
It makes me sick to say the least that TV will show the likes of Hague (minus his al Qaeda bandana I suspect) and der Fuhrer Cameron (while old sick folk are being basically murdered in our hospitals) laying wreathes.
We need an alternative but very peaceful alternative to Remembrance Sunday. We know the true history of the engineering before, during and after WW1.
This year Remembrance Sunday will take place on 11th November, three weeks from today.
As usual there will be the usual suspects laying wreathes in memory of the fallen, while creating terror and war in North Africa and the Middle East in order to advance an agenda for what is looking more and more like the third and final world war of a series of planned world wars that have so far been successful, otherwise we would not be having Remembrance Sunday.
It makes me sick to say the least that TV will show the likes of Hague (minus his al Qaeda bandana I suspect) and der Fuhrer Cameron (while old sick folk are being basically murdered in our hospitals) laying wreathes.
We need an alternative but very peaceful alternative to Remembrance Sunday. We know the true history of the engineering before, during and after WW1.
IF PRESIDENT OBAMA STATES THAT HE WILL REINVESTIGATE 9/11 THEN HE WILL WIN
It looks, sounds and smells like Obama is being dumped by the same powers that put him into The White House in the first place.
The incident in Benghazi in which Ambassador Stevens was killed was a setup and is being milked to blame Obama in order to get Romney elected. Dr Webster Tarpley is exposing this. If what Tarpley says is true, that the CIA protection team went AWOL on the day of the murder, and other stuff, then that is pretty strong evidence that there is a faction within the CIA working to get Obama kicked out.
I have always believed that 9/11 was designed and executed to kick off the WW3 that would be the third world war of three allegedly proposed in a plan attributed to Freemasonic sicko Albert Pike. Immediately after 9/11 General Wesley Clark was told of a plan for war and regime change in seven nations in five years; Iraq, Lebanon, Libya, Syria, Iran, Somalia and Sudan. This is basically the same list named in A Clean Break and Rebuilding America's Defenses. The first three names on that list can be ticked. The fourth, Syria, has been experiencing a covert and now overt invasion by lunatic Jihadis who have been led to believe that they are in Israel killing Jews! This invasion is being run by the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia, as exposed by Seymour Hersh, and assisted by NATO member Turkey with extra finance from Sunni Anglophile Qatar, home of al Jazeera.
But it is now late 2012. Over eleven years have passed since 9/11. And the plan for war and regime change in seven nations in five years is way, way behind.
So what is Obama doing to advance it?
Well, he helped to attack Libya last year, arguably illegally, which has prompted Walter Jones to issue HR 107.
In Syria, despite many calls to intervene Obama is much more aloof, or appears to be. There is not the overt assistance as in Libya, but Lillary Clinton was driving the Friends of Syria with Hasty Hague. But after all the massacres by al Qaeda and FSA blamed on Assad, and rumours of chemical weapons, etc, there is no overt military assistance.
Ditto Iran. For years we have been told that Iran is within minutes of developing a nuclear bomb and lobbing one in the direction of Tel Aviv. But still no war.
No war on Syria.
No war on Iran.
The plan was stalling, and has now stalled. It is moribund. It has ceased to be. It is an ex-plan. The wheels have come off and are flying off in all directions.
We all know that Israel did 9/11. That was why it was created and sustained in the first place, many decades ago.
And Netanyahu is poohing his pants. That is why there is so much support for Romney. Both go back a long way. Obama and Netanyahu cannot stand each other.
So is Obama being dumped because he is not advancing the agenda for that major war in the Middle East? Is that because he will not? Or cannot? If he cannot is it because of HR 107? If so then what can Romney do about HR 107 that Obama cannot?
As I suggested a few days ago, there is that much scepticism about governments everywhere that we cannot believe anything they say. Most Americans believed JFK was shot by Lee Harvey Oswald from the book depository with a single bullet. But not any more. I just took a look at the wikipedia page on opinion polls about 9/11. Within a few years of 9/11 there was already a very significant minority who did not believe the official 9/11 story. But If you add up the don't believes, the don't knows and those who want 9/11 reinvestigated then the believers suddenly make the minority.
9/11 has been the major driver for an aggressive foreign policy that has now seriously pissed off America. Reinvestigating 9/11 is a winner. It will bring many 9/11 sceptics out to vote for whoever states they will reinvestigate 9/11, but also those who have been unsure about 9/11 and are now sick of the wars.
The incident in Benghazi in which Ambassador Stevens was killed was a setup and is being milked to blame Obama in order to get Romney elected. Dr Webster Tarpley is exposing this. If what Tarpley says is true, that the CIA protection team went AWOL on the day of the murder, and other stuff, then that is pretty strong evidence that there is a faction within the CIA working to get Obama kicked out.
I have always believed that 9/11 was designed and executed to kick off the WW3 that would be the third world war of three allegedly proposed in a plan attributed to Freemasonic sicko Albert Pike. Immediately after 9/11 General Wesley Clark was told of a plan for war and regime change in seven nations in five years; Iraq, Lebanon, Libya, Syria, Iran, Somalia and Sudan. This is basically the same list named in A Clean Break and Rebuilding America's Defenses. The first three names on that list can be ticked. The fourth, Syria, has been experiencing a covert and now overt invasion by lunatic Jihadis who have been led to believe that they are in Israel killing Jews! This invasion is being run by the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia, as exposed by Seymour Hersh, and assisted by NATO member Turkey with extra finance from Sunni Anglophile Qatar, home of al Jazeera.
But it is now late 2012. Over eleven years have passed since 9/11. And the plan for war and regime change in seven nations in five years is way, way behind.
So what is Obama doing to advance it?
Well, he helped to attack Libya last year, arguably illegally, which has prompted Walter Jones to issue HR 107.
In Syria, despite many calls to intervene Obama is much more aloof, or appears to be. There is not the overt assistance as in Libya, but Lillary Clinton was driving the Friends of Syria with Hasty Hague. But after all the massacres by al Qaeda and FSA blamed on Assad, and rumours of chemical weapons, etc, there is no overt military assistance.
Ditto Iran. For years we have been told that Iran is within minutes of developing a nuclear bomb and lobbing one in the direction of Tel Aviv. But still no war.
No war on Syria.
No war on Iran.
The plan was stalling, and has now stalled. It is moribund. It has ceased to be. It is an ex-plan. The wheels have come off and are flying off in all directions.
We all know that Israel did 9/11. That was why it was created and sustained in the first place, many decades ago.
And Netanyahu is poohing his pants. That is why there is so much support for Romney. Both go back a long way. Obama and Netanyahu cannot stand each other.
So is Obama being dumped because he is not advancing the agenda for that major war in the Middle East? Is that because he will not? Or cannot? If he cannot is it because of HR 107? If so then what can Romney do about HR 107 that Obama cannot?
As I suggested a few days ago, there is that much scepticism about governments everywhere that we cannot believe anything they say. Most Americans believed JFK was shot by Lee Harvey Oswald from the book depository with a single bullet. But not any more. I just took a look at the wikipedia page on opinion polls about 9/11. Within a few years of 9/11 there was already a very significant minority who did not believe the official 9/11 story. But If you add up the don't believes, the don't knows and those who want 9/11 reinvestigated then the believers suddenly make the minority.
9/11 has been the major driver for an aggressive foreign policy that has now seriously pissed off America. Reinvestigating 9/11 is a winner. It will bring many 9/11 sceptics out to vote for whoever states they will reinvestigate 9/11, but also those who have been unsure about 9/11 and are now sick of the wars.
Saturday, October 20, 2012
A CAR BOMB ASSASSINATION IN LEBANON IS BLAMED ON SYRIA. SOUND FAMILIAR?
In February 2005 Rafik Hariri was assassinated when his car was blown up. Syria was immediately blamed. During the following anger a Cedar Revolution occured and Syria withdrew from Lebanon. This left Lebanon much less protected from Israeli aggression, so not surprisingly a year later Israel contrived a war on Lebanon.
But the initial allegations accusing Syria of the assassination of Hariri have been shown to be false. The Special Tribunal for Lebanon accused and held four men for several years due to a bunch of lies, and eventually released them. So the STL then accused Hezbollah, and well over a year ago said it would release the evidence to the public but as far as I am aware this has not been done.
But we know for a fact that in 1996 A Clean Break was written for then PM Netanyahu. It said
Hezbollah released footage of what it said was recorded from an Israeli drone whose communications had been hacked. It showed that the drone was following Rafik Hariri's movements. There were also several Israeli aircraft over Beirut on the day of Hariri's assassination.
So
1. Hariri was assassinated, which was instantly blamed on Syria.
2. this forced Syria to withdraw from Lebanon.
3. with Syria out of Lebanon, Israel started a war against Lebanon in 2006.
4. but by 2011 the initial allegations against Syria had still not been proven so new ones were made against Hezbollah.
5. so Hezbollah released footage that it claims was hacked from an Israeli drone that was following Hariri.
6. years before this Israel wrote that it would "engage" Hezbollah, Syria and Iran in Lebanon, using proxies.
In 2007 Seymour Hersh published The Redirection in which it was revealed that Israel had made a Faustian pact with Saudi Arabia to unleash Islamic terrorists on Syria.
Also in 2007 Francesco Cossiga stated that most of the world's intelligence agencies know that Israel did 9/11.
So when I hear that there has been yet another assassination by car bomb in Lebanon you can make an educated guess as to who did it.
But the initial allegations accusing Syria of the assassination of Hariri have been shown to be false. The Special Tribunal for Lebanon accused and held four men for several years due to a bunch of lies, and eventually released them. So the STL then accused Hezbollah, and well over a year ago said it would release the evidence to the public but as far as I am aware this has not been done.
But we know for a fact that in 1996 A Clean Break was written for then PM Netanyahu. It said
Securing the Northern Border
Syria challenges Israel on Lebanese soil. An effective approach, and one with which American can sympathize, would be if Israel seized the strategic initiative along its northern borders by engaging Hizballah, Syria, and Iran, as the principal agents of aggression in Lebanon, including by:
striking Syria’s drug-money and counterfeiting infrastructure in Lebanon, all of which focuses on Razi Qanan.
paralleling Syria’s behavior by establishing the precedent that Syrian territory is not immune to attacks emanating from Lebanon by Israeli proxy forces.
striking Syrian military targets in Lebanon, and should that prove insufficient, striking at select targets in Syria proper
[source : A Clean Break : A New Strategy for Securing the Realm, The Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies, http://www.israeleconomy.org/strat1.htm]
Hezbollah released footage of what it said was recorded from an Israeli drone whose communications had been hacked. It showed that the drone was following Rafik Hariri's movements. There were also several Israeli aircraft over Beirut on the day of Hariri's assassination.
So
1. Hariri was assassinated, which was instantly blamed on Syria.
2. this forced Syria to withdraw from Lebanon.
3. with Syria out of Lebanon, Israel started a war against Lebanon in 2006.
4. but by 2011 the initial allegations against Syria had still not been proven so new ones were made against Hezbollah.
5. so Hezbollah released footage that it claims was hacked from an Israeli drone that was following Hariri.
6. years before this Israel wrote that it would "engage" Hezbollah, Syria and Iran in Lebanon, using proxies.
In 2007 Seymour Hersh published The Redirection in which it was revealed that Israel had made a Faustian pact with Saudi Arabia to unleash Islamic terrorists on Syria.
Also in 2007 Francesco Cossiga stated that most of the world's intelligence agencies know that Israel did 9/11.
So when I hear that there has been yet another assassination by car bomb in Lebanon you can make an educated guess as to who did it.
Friday, October 19, 2012
WORLD WAR ONE WAS STILL A CONSPIRACY
Now it is Ed West's turn.
West has written in The Daily Telegraph on Seamus Milne's "redwash" of history. This is in reference to Milne's alleged far left politics and his cynicism of the forthcoming 'celebrations' of WW1.
But West shows his total ignorance with this statement.
But Great Britain engineered the conflict!
Britain began engineering the conflict decades before Arch Duke Ferdinand was assassinated, and well before Germany became any sort of possible threat!
IT WAS FREEMASONRY WOT DUNNIT.
Prince Edward as Grand Master of the United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE) engineered the series of treaties that fell quickly into place upon the assassination of Arch Duke Ferdinand. Then Edward's son George V tricked Germany into marching into Belgium.
And this is a crucial point against West's argument, that Germany was so strong that Britain had to defeat Germany; Germany basically asked for Britain's permission to march into Belgium to get to Paris!!
When Germany asked for this permission George V said that it was not Britain's quarrel and would stay out of it, but when Germany invaded Belgium, Britain cited an obscure treaty it had with Belgium that it did not need to enforce and declared war on Germany.
Besides the decades of manipulation to encircle Germany given the correct event there was also decades of failed manipulation to get the Czar of Russia overthrown and replaced by a Communist dictatorship, and decades of failed attempts to get a Jewish colony in Palestine.
Edward VII was Grand Master of UGLE. During the trial of the assassins of Ferdinand it was found that the assassins were Freemasons and had received assistance and encouragement from Freemasons abroad. Wilhelm II later claimed that he was told by a distinguished Freemason that Freemasonry had planned it all to create a power vacuum in Central Europe.
THEY ENGINEERED WW1!
It was not competing empires, as Milne argues.
It was not a righteous Great Britain being forced into putting down a tyrannical German despot, as West argues.
WW1 laid the foundations for the troubles of today.
Palestine was given to the Zionists, who tried to fill it with Jews but failed, even after cooperating with the Nazis.
The League of Nations, based in Geneva and financed by the Rockefellers, was created to fill that power vacuum, but the USA voted to stay out of it. So the power vacuum in Central Europe was then filled by the Wall Street-financed Nazis, who went on a rampage and invaded the Wall Street-financed Communist USSR, and also declared war on the USA after Pearl Harbour 1941. From this war grew the United Nations, also financed by the Rockefellers, and also Israel after the Holocaust finally persuaded world Jewry that Palestine was the only safe haven for them from a cruel and harsh world.
The UN is gradually assuming more and more control of the world, while Israel has provoked Islamic terrorism (which was protected by the Covenant of Security) and did 9/11 to kick off some kind of Clash of Civilizations.
I am not a Professor of Modern History. But I do hold a PhD in Applied Mathematics so I do have some appreciation of research and logic. I fear that many historians have been scared off the Zionist and Freemasonry arguments. They shouldn't be, because when you look at the evidence it is undeniable and crystal clear that the major events of modern history have been engineered with the aim of creating a tyrannical world government with depopulation and eugenics on its mind.
In 1782 at the Congress of Wilhemsbad, Freemasonry and the Illuminati agreed to join forces and try to rule the world. This congress really did occur, and the Illuminati was not a fictitious organisation. It really did exist. Books were written about them. People wrote about them. The Bavarian government hunted them down for treason and warned European royalty of them, but the founder Adam Weishaupt was protected by one of the members of the Illuminati, the Duke of Saxe Gotha.
Now get a load of this!
This is what the official site of the British Monarchy says about Edward VII.
Now re-read what I just wrote about Edward VII being Grand Master as he engineered the treaties well before WW1, and his son George V tricking Germany into invading Belgium, etc.
So it should now be painfully obvious what has happened. The Illuminati (who really did exist) found sanctuary in the House of Saxe-Gotha, and then managed to gain control of the British Monarchy through a marriage to Queen Victoria, and have since been implementing a diabolical plan for 3 world wars, involving the creation, the population and sustenance of Israel to provoke global terrorism, to establish the world government that they and Freemasonry agreed to unite for in 1782 at The Congress of Wilhelmsbad.
QED
West has written in The Daily Telegraph on Seamus Milne's "redwash" of history. This is in reference to Milne's alleged far left politics and his cynicism of the forthcoming 'celebrations' of WW1.
But West shows his total ignorance with this statement.
Britain was dragged into this conflict not because of imperialism or capitalism but fears over Germany’s navy, which threatened the British Isles.
[source : The Left's redwashing of the First World War, The Daily Telegraph, http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/edwest/100185728/the-lefts-redwashing-of-the-first-world-war/, 19/10/2012]
But Great Britain engineered the conflict!
Britain began engineering the conflict decades before Arch Duke Ferdinand was assassinated, and well before Germany became any sort of possible threat!
IT WAS FREEMASONRY WOT DUNNIT.
Prince Edward as Grand Master of the United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE) engineered the series of treaties that fell quickly into place upon the assassination of Arch Duke Ferdinand. Then Edward's son George V tricked Germany into marching into Belgium.
And this is a crucial point against West's argument, that Germany was so strong that Britain had to defeat Germany; Germany basically asked for Britain's permission to march into Belgium to get to Paris!!
When Germany asked for this permission George V said that it was not Britain's quarrel and would stay out of it, but when Germany invaded Belgium, Britain cited an obscure treaty it had with Belgium that it did not need to enforce and declared war on Germany.
Besides the decades of manipulation to encircle Germany given the correct event there was also decades of failed manipulation to get the Czar of Russia overthrown and replaced by a Communist dictatorship, and decades of failed attempts to get a Jewish colony in Palestine.
Edward VII was Grand Master of UGLE. During the trial of the assassins of Ferdinand it was found that the assassins were Freemasons and had received assistance and encouragement from Freemasons abroad. Wilhelm II later claimed that he was told by a distinguished Freemason that Freemasonry had planned it all to create a power vacuum in Central Europe.
THEY ENGINEERED WW1!
It was not competing empires, as Milne argues.
It was not a righteous Great Britain being forced into putting down a tyrannical German despot, as West argues.
WW1 laid the foundations for the troubles of today.
Palestine was given to the Zionists, who tried to fill it with Jews but failed, even after cooperating with the Nazis.
The League of Nations, based in Geneva and financed by the Rockefellers, was created to fill that power vacuum, but the USA voted to stay out of it. So the power vacuum in Central Europe was then filled by the Wall Street-financed Nazis, who went on a rampage and invaded the Wall Street-financed Communist USSR, and also declared war on the USA after Pearl Harbour 1941. From this war grew the United Nations, also financed by the Rockefellers, and also Israel after the Holocaust finally persuaded world Jewry that Palestine was the only safe haven for them from a cruel and harsh world.
The UN is gradually assuming more and more control of the world, while Israel has provoked Islamic terrorism (which was protected by the Covenant of Security) and did 9/11 to kick off some kind of Clash of Civilizations.
I am not a Professor of Modern History. But I do hold a PhD in Applied Mathematics so I do have some appreciation of research and logic. I fear that many historians have been scared off the Zionist and Freemasonry arguments. They shouldn't be, because when you look at the evidence it is undeniable and crystal clear that the major events of modern history have been engineered with the aim of creating a tyrannical world government with depopulation and eugenics on its mind.
In 1782 at the Congress of Wilhemsbad, Freemasonry and the Illuminati agreed to join forces and try to rule the world. This congress really did occur, and the Illuminati was not a fictitious organisation. It really did exist. Books were written about them. People wrote about them. The Bavarian government hunted them down for treason and warned European royalty of them, but the founder Adam Weishaupt was protected by one of the members of the Illuminati, the Duke of Saxe Gotha.
Now get a load of this!
This is what the official site of the British Monarchy says about Edward VII.
The only British monarch of the House of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha was King Edward VII, who reigned for nine years at the beginning of the modern age in the early years of the twentieth century.
[source : House of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha, http://www.royal.gov.uk/HistoryoftheMonarchy/KingsandQueensoftheUnitedKingdom/Saxe-Coburg-Gotha/Saxe-Coburg-Gotha.aspx, (Accessed 18 October 2012)]
Now re-read what I just wrote about Edward VII being Grand Master as he engineered the treaties well before WW1, and his son George V tricking Germany into invading Belgium, etc.
So it should now be painfully obvious what has happened. The Illuminati (who really did exist) found sanctuary in the House of Saxe-Gotha, and then managed to gain control of the British Monarchy through a marriage to Queen Victoria, and have since been implementing a diabolical plan for 3 world wars, involving the creation, the population and sustenance of Israel to provoke global terrorism, to establish the world government that they and Freemasonry agreed to unite for in 1782 at The Congress of Wilhelmsbad.
QED
Thursday, October 18, 2012
WORLD WAR ONE WAS A CONSPIRACY
Seamus Milne wrote in The Guardian two days ago about World War One, or to be more specific he was commenting on the suggestion from der Fuhrer David Cameron of spending £50 million on a "truly national commemoration" of World War One, with school visits to the trenches, etc.
Milne has fallen into the trap of the economic theory of history, as others have, which proposes that all wars have been due to economics and competing empires. Milne's background? PPE at Oxford (one of the favourite routes for MPs), Economics at Birkbeck, and then far left politics, possibly sympathetic communism.
Of all the history I have read on WW1, nobody answers this question : why did Kaiser Wilhelm II write in his memoirs that he believes that Freemasonry is to blame?
Why would the King of Germany suggest that?
Was it to pass the blame? Many do blame Germany for starting WW1. Germany was defeated and forced to accept blame. The Treaty of Versailles then devastated Germany. But there is strong, and royal, evidence that Germany was tricked into invading Belgium, with Wilhelm II having been led to believe by the King of England that Great Britain would not involve itself in any war on the continent, but as soon as Germany invaded Belgium Great Britain cited an obscure treaty with Belgium that it did not need to enforce and declared war on Germany.
Did Wilhelm II have some evidence to support his Freemasonic allegation? Well, he cites "a distinguished Freemason" who told him that Freemasonry planned it all to create a power vacuum in Central Europe.
So is there any evidence to support this?
YES!
The event that kicked off WW1 was the assassination of Arch Duke Ferdinand. But guess what? It was well known that Ferdinand had been condemnded to death by Freemasonry...AND HE KNEW IT! And guess something else; the assassins were Freemasons and received assistance from Freemasons abroad!
But that was just the trigger. Decades before the assassination the Grand Master of the United Grand Lodge of England had been creating a series of alliances that would trap Germany, given the right event. That man was King Edward VII, and suspected Jack the Ripper.
Wilhelm II states that the reason for WW1 was to create a power vacuum in Central Europe. This is partly true. The devastating Treaty of Versailles led to the rise of a nationalist Hitler supported by Wall Street. But other consequences of WW1 were that Russia was finally destabilised enough, after decades of failed manipulation, so that a Communist revolution finally succeeded (Jacob Schiff proudly boasted of his finance of and assistance to the revolutionaries), and Palestine was taken from the Ottomans after the British through TE Lawrence tricked the Arabs into joining the British and rebelling against the German allies the Ottomans. But the Arabs were later stabbed in the back when the British and Americans backed the ibn Saud tribe to take control of the territory, who later created Saudi Arabia, with Palestine given to the Jews through the Balfour Declaration and later conferences and treaties.
But the anticipated world government born from WW1 did not survive. The League of Nations failed because the USA voted out of it, because the USA had fought in the war only during the final months and did not experience death like the rest, such as France and Great Britain.
So a Second World War was required.
With Wall Street behind both Communism and Nazism, WW2 was bound to occur between the two extreme ideologies. Communist spies in the USA gave the USSR the bomb, and we also gave the USSR Eastern Europe, despite going to war to save Poland from tyranny. Many German Jews did not take up the opportunity to migrate to Palestine, despite initial assistance from the Nazis, which turned into racist attacks, and then the Holocaust, which did eventually persuade the Jews that Palestine was the only safe haven for them from a cruel and harsh world.
So today we see a serious, serious war brewing in the Middle East.
And the driving force?
ISRAEL!
A Clean Break and Rebuilding America's Defenses, were both written by the same bunch of Zionutters, and both demanded war on Israel's enemies, but with American muscle. The trigger for the series of wars in the Middle East was 9/11, which is blamed, by most if not all the world's intelligence agencies, on Israel. (See Francesco Cossiga November 2007)
Can you see a common factor?
WW1? Palestine was taken from the Ottomans.
WW2? Despite a decade or so of at first assistance and then intimidation from the Wall Street-financed Nazis, German Jews wanted to stay at home. As did most of world Jewry. But after the Holocaust...?
WW3? 9/11 was done by Israel and Saudi Arabia (CONFIRMED!), and is threatening to develop into the WW3 of the plan attributed to the Freemasonic sicko Albert Pike, resulting in a tyrannical world government that would rapidly implement drastic human population reduction and eugenics policies.
But back to Milne.
There is a danger that if this conspiracy is not recognised then we will fall into a trap, because we think that "hey, shit happens".
Yes, shit does happen. People die in motorway crashes. People fall down stairs and break their backs. Rabbits get run over.
Shit happens.
But these are very minor events.
But when it comes to monumental events, such as world wars, then there is a blatantly obvious conspiracy, with the same cabal behind it all, creating trillions out of thin air to finance it all.
Milne is absolutely write to mock der Fuhrer with this nationalistic WW1 'celebration'. We are at this very minute killing old folk in hospitals by dodgy doctors putting them on The Liverpool Care Pathway for no other reason than to save money because we bailed out fascist bankers when we should have sent them to jail for a very, very, very long time. Most patients who were put on the LCP but then taken off it have survived for a long time after. But we are also indirectly financing al Qaeda in Syria. We helped them in Libya. We gave them sanctuary with the Covenant of Security.
And as for Jimmy Savile and the establishment that knew and protected him...?
Milne is one of the better journalists at The Guardian.
But it does my head in when someone like Milne still peddles the "shit happens" theory of history, blaming it all on economic forces.
Israel was not created due to economic forces. It is a parasite of the USA.
When is Charlie Skelton being appointed Editor in Chief at The Guardian?
Milne's mildly praiseworthy rant is
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/oct/16/first-world-war-imperial-bloodbath?INTCMP=SRCH
Milne has fallen into the trap of the economic theory of history, as others have, which proposes that all wars have been due to economics and competing empires. Milne's background? PPE at Oxford (one of the favourite routes for MPs), Economics at Birkbeck, and then far left politics, possibly sympathetic communism.
Of all the history I have read on WW1, nobody answers this question : why did Kaiser Wilhelm II write in his memoirs that he believes that Freemasonry is to blame?
Why would the King of Germany suggest that?
Was it to pass the blame? Many do blame Germany for starting WW1. Germany was defeated and forced to accept blame. The Treaty of Versailles then devastated Germany. But there is strong, and royal, evidence that Germany was tricked into invading Belgium, with Wilhelm II having been led to believe by the King of England that Great Britain would not involve itself in any war on the continent, but as soon as Germany invaded Belgium Great Britain cited an obscure treaty with Belgium that it did not need to enforce and declared war on Germany.
Did Wilhelm II have some evidence to support his Freemasonic allegation? Well, he cites "a distinguished Freemason" who told him that Freemasonry planned it all to create a power vacuum in Central Europe.
So is there any evidence to support this?
YES!
The event that kicked off WW1 was the assassination of Arch Duke Ferdinand. But guess what? It was well known that Ferdinand had been condemnded to death by Freemasonry...AND HE KNEW IT! And guess something else; the assassins were Freemasons and received assistance from Freemasons abroad!
But that was just the trigger. Decades before the assassination the Grand Master of the United Grand Lodge of England had been creating a series of alliances that would trap Germany, given the right event. That man was King Edward VII, and suspected Jack the Ripper.
Wilhelm II states that the reason for WW1 was to create a power vacuum in Central Europe. This is partly true. The devastating Treaty of Versailles led to the rise of a nationalist Hitler supported by Wall Street. But other consequences of WW1 were that Russia was finally destabilised enough, after decades of failed manipulation, so that a Communist revolution finally succeeded (Jacob Schiff proudly boasted of his finance of and assistance to the revolutionaries), and Palestine was taken from the Ottomans after the British through TE Lawrence tricked the Arabs into joining the British and rebelling against the German allies the Ottomans. But the Arabs were later stabbed in the back when the British and Americans backed the ibn Saud tribe to take control of the territory, who later created Saudi Arabia, with Palestine given to the Jews through the Balfour Declaration and later conferences and treaties.
But the anticipated world government born from WW1 did not survive. The League of Nations failed because the USA voted out of it, because the USA had fought in the war only during the final months and did not experience death like the rest, such as France and Great Britain.
So a Second World War was required.
With Wall Street behind both Communism and Nazism, WW2 was bound to occur between the two extreme ideologies. Communist spies in the USA gave the USSR the bomb, and we also gave the USSR Eastern Europe, despite going to war to save Poland from tyranny. Many German Jews did not take up the opportunity to migrate to Palestine, despite initial assistance from the Nazis, which turned into racist attacks, and then the Holocaust, which did eventually persuade the Jews that Palestine was the only safe haven for them from a cruel and harsh world.
So today we see a serious, serious war brewing in the Middle East.
And the driving force?
ISRAEL!
A Clean Break and Rebuilding America's Defenses, were both written by the same bunch of Zionutters, and both demanded war on Israel's enemies, but with American muscle. The trigger for the series of wars in the Middle East was 9/11, which is blamed, by most if not all the world's intelligence agencies, on Israel. (See Francesco Cossiga November 2007)
Can you see a common factor?
WW1? Palestine was taken from the Ottomans.
WW2? Despite a decade or so of at first assistance and then intimidation from the Wall Street-financed Nazis, German Jews wanted to stay at home. As did most of world Jewry. But after the Holocaust...?
WW3? 9/11 was done by Israel and Saudi Arabia (CONFIRMED!), and is threatening to develop into the WW3 of the plan attributed to the Freemasonic sicko Albert Pike, resulting in a tyrannical world government that would rapidly implement drastic human population reduction and eugenics policies.
But back to Milne.
There is a danger that if this conspiracy is not recognised then we will fall into a trap, because we think that "hey, shit happens".
Yes, shit does happen. People die in motorway crashes. People fall down stairs and break their backs. Rabbits get run over.
Shit happens.
But these are very minor events.
But when it comes to monumental events, such as world wars, then there is a blatantly obvious conspiracy, with the same cabal behind it all, creating trillions out of thin air to finance it all.
Milne is absolutely write to mock der Fuhrer with this nationalistic WW1 'celebration'. We are at this very minute killing old folk in hospitals by dodgy doctors putting them on The Liverpool Care Pathway for no other reason than to save money because we bailed out fascist bankers when we should have sent them to jail for a very, very, very long time. Most patients who were put on the LCP but then taken off it have survived for a long time after. But we are also indirectly financing al Qaeda in Syria. We helped them in Libya. We gave them sanctuary with the Covenant of Security.
And as for Jimmy Savile and the establishment that knew and protected him...?
Milne is one of the better journalists at The Guardian.
But it does my head in when someone like Milne still peddles the "shit happens" theory of history, blaming it all on economic forces.
Israel was not created due to economic forces. It is a parasite of the USA.
When is Charlie Skelton being appointed Editor in Chief at The Guardian?
Milne's mildly praiseworthy rant is
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/oct/16/first-world-war-imperial-bloodbath?INTCMP=SRCH
Wednesday, October 17, 2012
WILL PRESIDENT OBAMA REINVESTIGATE 11 SEPTEMBER 2001?
Or at least think about it?
Or at least say he is thinking about it?
I am asking this because I have a tremendous amount of respect for Webster Tarpley, who has done some research into the events of 11 September 2012 in Benghazi during which US Ambassador to Libya Christopher Stephens was murdered. Tarpley is accusing the CIA Mormon Mafia for those events, in order to blame Obama, and which are being blamed on Obama, by most of the media, and some very surprising corners of the media too.
To me, the CIA Mormon Mafia-controlled media doth protest too much on this, and it smells like a stitch up, with Netanyahu directing some events somewhere to get his old buddy Romney elected.
But if you add the possible expose of Obama's real father.
And this from a recent article in Press TV (which possibly not coincidentally has recently been silenced)
CJCS Dempsey has so far strongly resisted any attempt at war on Iran. All American interference in Syria so far has been CIA. But there was significant overt US military assistance given to the war on Libya.
The original 9/11 is going the way of the JFK assassination. As time goes by more and more see the corruption and fraud in the official version. But we learn fast, and instead of taking decades to understand this, it now only takes years.
In other words, many know now for a fact that 9/11 was an inside job.
11 September 2001 was an inside job by a circle in which Netanyahu was crucial if not instrumental.
11 September 2012 was an inside job, but not by Obama.
Obama could redeem himself by reopening 9/11. I believe he was not involved, but may know now some things that could point the way for the truth to come to light.
And for that many many many people, not just in America but around the world, would be eternally grateful.
Both 9/11s were inside jobs.
Both 9/11s were inside jobs.
Both 9/11s were inside jobs.
Both 9/11s were inside jobs.
Both 9/11s were inside jobs.
Both 9/11s were inside jobs.
Both 9/11s were inside jobs.
Both 9/11s were inside jobs.
Or at least say he is thinking about it?
I am asking this because I have a tremendous amount of respect for Webster Tarpley, who has done some research into the events of 11 September 2012 in Benghazi during which US Ambassador to Libya Christopher Stephens was murdered. Tarpley is accusing the CIA Mormon Mafia for those events, in order to blame Obama, and which are being blamed on Obama, by most of the media, and some very surprising corners of the media too.
To me, the CIA Mormon Mafia-controlled media doth protest too much on this, and it smells like a stitch up, with Netanyahu directing some events somewhere to get his old buddy Romney elected.
But if you add the possible expose of Obama's real father.
And this from a recent article in Press TV (which possibly not coincidentally has recently been silenced)
Some of the same high-level sources who point to Richard Clarke as the US boss of the Israeli-instigated 9/11 false flag operation also claim that President Obama, Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Gen. Dempsey, and other powerful Americans are considering exposing the truth about 9/11 during a second Obama term. In other words, Obama's re-election could put Israel out of business, and get Netanyahu hanged from the nearest lamp-post.
[source : Israel seeks war on Iran to keep lid on 9/11, PressTV, http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2012/09/20/262683/israel-seeks-iran-war-to-keep-lid-on-911/, 21/09/2012]
CJCS Dempsey has so far strongly resisted any attempt at war on Iran. All American interference in Syria so far has been CIA. But there was significant overt US military assistance given to the war on Libya.
The original 9/11 is going the way of the JFK assassination. As time goes by more and more see the corruption and fraud in the official version. But we learn fast, and instead of taking decades to understand this, it now only takes years.
In other words, many know now for a fact that 9/11 was an inside job.
11 September 2001 was an inside job by a circle in which Netanyahu was crucial if not instrumental.
11 September 2012 was an inside job, but not by Obama.
Obama could redeem himself by reopening 9/11. I believe he was not involved, but may know now some things that could point the way for the truth to come to light.
And for that many many many people, not just in America but around the world, would be eternally grateful.
Both 9/11s were inside jobs.
Both 9/11s were inside jobs.
Both 9/11s were inside jobs.
Both 9/11s were inside jobs.
Both 9/11s were inside jobs.
Both 9/11s were inside jobs.
Both 9/11s were inside jobs.
Both 9/11s were inside jobs.
Tuesday, October 16, 2012
AND NOW FOR WORLD GOVERNMENT
Are you having a laugh?
Is he having a laugh?
...
It ain't gonna happen.
The inside job 9/11 happened 12 years ago.
And guess what?
NO WORLD GOVERNMENT!
Nobody wants a world government.
What they do want is cooperating sovereign nations.
Is he having a laugh?
...
It ain't gonna happen.
The inside job 9/11 happened 12 years ago.
And guess what?
NO WORLD GOVERNMENT!
Nobody wants a world government.
What they do want is cooperating sovereign nations.
Sunday, October 14, 2012
WAS 9/11 WORTH IT?
As an inside job, was 9/11 worth it?
All that secrecy.
All that manipulation.
All that stress.
All that worrying about being found out.
Well, part of the plan was revealed by General Wesley Clark, who said he was told shortly after 9/11 that there was going to be war and regime change in seven nations in five years; Iraq, Lebanon, Libya, Syria, Iran, Sudan and Somalia. Iraq was one of them, and the war on Iraq started officially in March 2003. Five years later was March 2008. During that time there had been a war on Lebanon, which was one of the seven nations named. Israel engineered that war by sending troops into an area known to be controlled by Hezbollah and then demanding their release knowing they were already dead. But somehow, with a supposed superior military, Israel lost that war.
So, eleven years after 9/11, what is the situation?
Iraq was successfully invaded, but the rebellion took longer to quell and seriously stalled the plan at the first hurdle. After Iraq was invaded attention turned to Lebanon, and Rafik Hariri was assassinated. His murder was incorrectly blamed on Syria, who were forced to leave Lebanon. A year later Israel contrived a war that it somehow managed to lose, actually leaving Hezbollah stronger. Several attempts were made to start war on Iran, but failed. UN SCR 1973 allowed NATO to establish a NFZ over Libya, but this quickly morphed into a blatant operation to 'get Gaddafi', which eventually happened in October 2011. But in the process it became apparent that a relationship was required between NATO and al Qaeda and their mates. This was exposed by Seymour Hersh in The Redirection in 2007 and Libya provided initial evidence. Events in Syria have supported the allegations put forth in The Redirection, that the USA is now aligned with al Qaeda, who allegedly flew the planes into the WTC and The Pentagon on that murdered September day.
But Syria is kicking al Qaeda butt, despite AQ receiving hundreds of millions of dollars from Saudi Arabia and Qatar. Turkey has been nurturing al Qaeda, and now that clown Erdogan is showing signs of insanity and/or dementia. Can he really be trusted?
Taking into everything into account, 9/11 was initially successful. Most of the USA and the world were fooled...for a while. And perhaps if the regimes in those seven nations had been toppled by the summer of 2008 then maybe it could have been labelled a success.
But in 2007 Francesco Cossiga stated that the world's intelligence agencies know Israel was involved. Saudi Arabia was too. Both are now upto their necks in blood in Syria.
It is now late 2012.
The wars have failed. Only two regimes of the initial seven nations have been removed. Hezbollah is now even stronger, flying its own drones hundreds of miles into Israeli airspace. Sure, Saddam and Gaddafi have gone, but now al Qaeda is on the loose, threatening jihad all the the way to The White House.
And now even the current POTUS and CJCS are letting it be known that they are considering going public on 9/11. Though why they don't just come out with it is beyond me. 99.9% of the whole world would be extremely grateful. I assume it is fear of death. The CJCS was recently attacked in Afghanistan, and a few days ago someone shot at Obama's campaign office. I assume that neither the current CJCS or POTUS had anything to do with 9/11, but you can bet that 11 years after 9/11 that there has been some sort of private investigation into 9/11 by the US military and intelligence community and they have a pretty good idea about know whodunnit.
All that secrecy.
All that manipulation.
All that stress.
All that worrying about being found out.
Well, part of the plan was revealed by General Wesley Clark, who said he was told shortly after 9/11 that there was going to be war and regime change in seven nations in five years; Iraq, Lebanon, Libya, Syria, Iran, Sudan and Somalia. Iraq was one of them, and the war on Iraq started officially in March 2003. Five years later was March 2008. During that time there had been a war on Lebanon, which was one of the seven nations named. Israel engineered that war by sending troops into an area known to be controlled by Hezbollah and then demanding their release knowing they were already dead. But somehow, with a supposed superior military, Israel lost that war.
So, eleven years after 9/11, what is the situation?
Iraq was successfully invaded, but the rebellion took longer to quell and seriously stalled the plan at the first hurdle. After Iraq was invaded attention turned to Lebanon, and Rafik Hariri was assassinated. His murder was incorrectly blamed on Syria, who were forced to leave Lebanon. A year later Israel contrived a war that it somehow managed to lose, actually leaving Hezbollah stronger. Several attempts were made to start war on Iran, but failed. UN SCR 1973 allowed NATO to establish a NFZ over Libya, but this quickly morphed into a blatant operation to 'get Gaddafi', which eventually happened in October 2011. But in the process it became apparent that a relationship was required between NATO and al Qaeda and their mates. This was exposed by Seymour Hersh in The Redirection in 2007 and Libya provided initial evidence. Events in Syria have supported the allegations put forth in The Redirection, that the USA is now aligned with al Qaeda, who allegedly flew the planes into the WTC and The Pentagon on that murdered September day.
But Syria is kicking al Qaeda butt, despite AQ receiving hundreds of millions of dollars from Saudi Arabia and Qatar. Turkey has been nurturing al Qaeda, and now that clown Erdogan is showing signs of insanity and/or dementia. Can he really be trusted?
Taking into everything into account, 9/11 was initially successful. Most of the USA and the world were fooled...for a while. And perhaps if the regimes in those seven nations had been toppled by the summer of 2008 then maybe it could have been labelled a success.
But in 2007 Francesco Cossiga stated that the world's intelligence agencies know Israel was involved. Saudi Arabia was too. Both are now upto their necks in blood in Syria.
It is now late 2012.
The wars have failed. Only two regimes of the initial seven nations have been removed. Hezbollah is now even stronger, flying its own drones hundreds of miles into Israeli airspace. Sure, Saddam and Gaddafi have gone, but now al Qaeda is on the loose, threatening jihad all the the way to The White House.
And now even the current POTUS and CJCS are letting it be known that they are considering going public on 9/11. Though why they don't just come out with it is beyond me. 99.9% of the whole world would be extremely grateful. I assume it is fear of death. The CJCS was recently attacked in Afghanistan, and a few days ago someone shot at Obama's campaign office. I assume that neither the current CJCS or POTUS had anything to do with 9/11, but you can bet that 11 years after 9/11 that there has been some sort of private investigation into 9/11 by the US military and intelligence community and they have a pretty good idea about know whodunnit.
Saturday, October 13, 2012
ESTABLISHMENT WAS UNAWARE OF JIMMY SAVILE'S CONDUCT
Are you having a laugh?
Are they having a laugh?
Are they having a laugh?
Thursday, October 11, 2012
I HAVEN'T USED THIS WORD IN A LONG LONG TIIME
I heard the news about Turkey forcing a Syrian civilian air passenger plane to land in Turkey briefly last night. Details were scarce then.
But this morning RT, not surprisingly, had this news as their headline, and with much more detail. And when I heard the details I had to think not once, not twice, but three times about what I had heard. And then I used a word I have not used in a long long time; unbe-fucking-lievable!
This is more of a swipe at Russia than it is at Syria.
And Turkey would not display such madness unless NATO was fully behind it.
But this morning RT, not surprisingly, had this news as their headline, and with much more detail. And when I heard the details I had to think not once, not twice, but three times about what I had heard. And then I used a word I have not used in a long long time; unbe-fucking-lievable!
This is more of a swipe at Russia than it is at Syria.
And Turkey would not display such madness unless NATO was fully behind it.
Monday, October 08, 2012
ARABLEAKS
Does anyone believe the Wikileak-style 'leaks' on Syria currently being 'leaked' by al Arabiya?
NOT ME!
What a farce.
But they do expose how Wikileaks is being used.
NOT ME!
What a farce.
But they do expose how Wikileaks is being used.
Saturday, October 06, 2012
JIMMY SAVILE IS THE TIP OF THE ICEBERG
The revelations about Jimmy Savile and friends are just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to our inglorious establishment. Although Radio One was supposed to represent rebellion it was simply a disguise for the establishment to push their criminal and satanist lifestyle on us, a criminal lifestyle that continues today by flying planes into the WTC and Pentagon and blaming al Qaeda in order to start a series of wars in which al Qaeda is now our ally!
YOU COULD NOT MAKE THIS STUFF UP!!
That series of wars is supposed to result in a terrible WW3 so that the establishment can get away with robbing us of tens if not hundreds of trillions of pounds, dollars and euros in an engineered financial crisis, and establish an all powerful one world government that they would control and implement drastic population reduction and eugenics policies.
David Icke was, is and will be right all the time on this one. There is something 'not of this world' about them.
YOU COULD NOT MAKE THIS STUFF UP!!
That series of wars is supposed to result in a terrible WW3 so that the establishment can get away with robbing us of tens if not hundreds of trillions of pounds, dollars and euros in an engineered financial crisis, and establish an all powerful one world government that they would control and implement drastic population reduction and eugenics policies.
David Icke was, is and will be right all the time on this one. There is something 'not of this world' about them.
Tuesday, October 02, 2012
SYRIA IS BEING OVERTLY INVADED WITH OUR ASSISTANCE
The BND of Germany have found that 95% of the rebs are not Syrian, but foreign.
And a lot of 'em are al Qaeda members or sympathisers.
Nice one, Hague! Wear your al Qaeda bandana with pride.
But this is what the Covenant of Security was all about.
Meanwhile, the so-called German BND (Bundesnachrichtendienst / German Federal Intelligence Service) has admitted in an official report that only 5% of the armed terrorists in Syria are really Syrians and, thus, 95% of these Western-backed terrorists and religious fanatics are from other countries.
According to the German newspaper “Die Welt”, the German Federal Intelligence Service (BND / Bundesnachrichtendienst) has published this statement in a new official and detailed report about their findings on the so-called “revolution” in Syria.
In addition, it is also said that the German Federal Intelligence Service (BND / Bundesnachrichtendienst) has detailed listed the accounts of the nationalities of these foreign-supported fighters in Syria and even their locations in the country.
Thus, allegedly the majority of the armed fighters in Syria come from several African countries and it is likely that a lot of these fighters from these African countries are members of the so-called al-Qaeda (also known as al-CIAda).
It seems that the German Federal Intelligence Service (BND / Bundesnachrichtendienst) assumes that the amount of foreign-backed terrorists in Syria can be estimated at a number of 14,800 armed persons.
[source : Syria: Another Arms Depot in Damascus – Most terrorists are foreigners, Syria News, http://www.syrianews.cc/syria-arms-depot-damascus-terrorists-foreigners/, 02/10/2012]
And a lot of 'em are al Qaeda members or sympathisers.
Nice one, Hague! Wear your al Qaeda bandana with pride.
But this is what the Covenant of Security was all about.
