BILDERBERG BOLLOCKS

Why is the NATO media hyping up Russia's homosexuality laws to the point of hysteria, yet no mention is made of our glorious ally, the diabolical medieval Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, regarding its flogging and possible state execution of gays, or its role in the supply of cutthroat Jihadis in Syria or the patsies for 9/11?

This is The Gay Elephant in the Pink Living Room.

So why is the NATO media hyping up Russia's homosexuality laws to the point of hysteria, yet no mention is made of our glorious ally, the diabolical medieval Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, regarding its flogging and possible state execution of gays, or its role in the supply of cutthroat Jihadis in Syria or the patsies for 9/11?

It is because Putin has done our cowardly warmongering 'leaders' like a kipper, and they are desperate to put whatever pressure they can on him and Russia, even stooping so low as to believe that a snowflake could end Putin's Presidency.

But now that that pink line of attack has been erased, the case of the TV channel Dozhd has now concerned The Washington Post so much that one of their editorials is dedicated to the shunning of Dozhd by the Russian media. The editorial begins:

FROM HIS first days in power, Russian President Vladimir Putin realized that control over television was critical to maintaining his hold over the huge country. Mr. Putin tightened his grip on the major broadcast television stations, wresting the powerful Channel 1 away from the oligarch Boris Berezovsky.

[source : Putin’s knives in the night threaten an independent Russian broadcaster, Editorial, The Washington Post, 14th February 2014]

Our media is far from 'free', and hasn't been free for decades, since at least the second world war, when Operation Mockingbird was implemented, and only a handful of corporations own everything of any significance.

And as for that crook Berezovsky, he was no angel, on the edge of nuclear smuggling rings and engaged in all sorts of dodgy business, and he was possibly murdered because he was planning on returning to Russia. Oh, what tales he could have told! A few days ago it was ruled that The Home Secretary should provide more solid reasons for not holding a public inquiry into the murder of Alexander Litvinenko. Litvinenko was Berezovsky's gofer. I was one of the first to ridicule the suggestion that Russia murdered Litvinenko, and was ridiculed for it. But I too think that the reason given as to why there is no public inquiry into the murder of Litvinenko is flimsy at best. The reason given is to preserve international and trade relations. But for at least 2 years there has been immense pressure applied to Putin to acquiesce to an attack on Syria. Immense. Our NATO leaders are that desperate to attack Syria that they threatened Putin via Prince Bandar bin Sultan that they would unleash hell on earth on Syria to pressure Putin into dumping Assad. What happened in August last year? A massive false flag attack in which the first reports stated that well over 1000 civilians had been killed by chemical weapons. My argument is that, if our leaders are that desperate to oust Assad that they are prepared to run such a false flag attack then surely they would relish the opportunity to lay bare before the world all the slam dunk evidence they have that Russia murdered Litvinenko. Surely such evidence would pressure Putin to acquiesce to an attack on Syria. But whenever an opportunity arises for such evidence to be revealed the British government hides behind some wafer thin argument and their 'evidence' lies in a dark cupboard somewhere in the deep vaults of Whitehall.

That is, if such slam dunk evidence actually exists...

While I am on the subject of Litvinenko, there is still the problem of 3 small objects that were up his arse when he was first admitted to hospital. This was reported in The Independent but was very quickly 'disappeared' down the memory hole, replaced by images of the melting radioactive traitor. But I'vé kept a record of it:

The poison used to attack the former Russian spy Alexander Litvinenko remained unknown last night as doctors searching for a radioactive toxin focused their efforts on pieces of "dense matter" found in his intestines.

The team treating Mr Litvinenko at University College Hospital in central London believe the defector must have knowingly swallowed the three pieces of material which have become lodged in his colon.

X-rays have shown that two of the items are of a similar size to a 2p coin and the other is the shape of a figure "8", according to a hospital source. But it is not yet known whether the three items are linked to Mr Litvinenko's illness, which has left him without a functioning immune system, due to the failure of his bone marrow, and liver damage. Tests are being carried out to identify the pieces of material.

[source : Doctors treating poisoned Russian focus on objects in his colon, The Independent, http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/doctors-treating-poisoned-russian-focus-on-objects-in-his-colon-425435.html, Accessed 23/06/2012, original article published 23rd November 2006]

And that was the last we heard of that.

But back to the WP editorial.

TV Dozhd pushed the boundaries of the permitted with biting satire, talk shows and extensive news coverage of opposition leaders, including Alexei Navalny, as well as the massive street protests against Mr. Putin in 2011 and 2012.

Navalny is the Wall Street candidate, sponsored by the National Endowment for Democracy. And the 'massive street protests', as the WP calls them, was called The White Revolution, just another colour revolution sponsored by the West, like the Rose Revolution in Georgia that brought The Tie Muncher of Tblisi Saakashvili to power who launched an attack on villagers in South Ossetia as they slept in their beds, provoking Russia and hoping to drag the USA into the conflict. Other colour revolutions were Orange in Ukraine, Green in Iran, and a miserable Jasmine in China.

The FT warned Putin not to run in its editorials in early 2011.

And the WP ends so theatrically:

Ostensibly taking offense at the Leningrad poll cynically provides a bit of patriotic cover. But the result is the same: It looks like yet another light in Russia’s democratic struggle — the refreshing openness of TV Dozhd — is about to go dark.

The 'refreshing openness' of Wall Street propaganda?

For decades The Washington Post was owned by a family, the Graham, who were ever present at one of the most secretive meetings in the world, Bilderberg, where no reporter who attends can report on the proceedings or his/her career is finished. The WP was sold last year to Jeff Bezos...A BILDERBERGER!

WHAT.

A.

LOAD.

OF.

BOLLOCKS!!