REUTERS CLAIMS UKRAINE REBEL COMMANDER TOLD THEM THAT REBELS HAD BUK BUT HE THEN DENIES HE SAID THAT

EXCLUSIVE: Ukraine rebel commander confirms to Reuters fighters had BUK missile system: http://t.co/1LyPK7xmWe pic.twitter.com/AkwzTU0BO0

— Reuters Top News (@Reuters) July 23, 2014

I just spoke to Alexander Khodakovsky. Denies all the details in the @ReutersWorld story (http://t.co/Z5Bb57hxK6) Says "misunderstood" Odd

— Gabriel Gatehouse (@ggatehouse) July 23, 2014

Khodakovsky was fired as DNR "security minister" a few days before #MH17 went down. Russia and the rebels could claim it's bad blood.

— max seddon (@maxseddon) July 23, 2014

It is not "odd".

Reuters is owned by the Rothschilds and their network.

Most of the NATO media is.

And if you read what Khodakovsky is quoted as saying, he does not confirm anything, only that he 'heard' something.

And Sky News tonight had 2 aviation experts looking at a photograph of what was said to have been a piece of MH17. Their conclusion from this one piece of evidence was that MH17 was shot down by a BUK.

But who controlled that BUK?

Who had the training to use it?

If the rebels captured one then was it operational? And could they use it?

And why has the Ukraine Govt not released the ATC transcripts? Even after Russia released some of its evidence, provoking NATO to backtrack on their initial claims that it was "Putin's Missile" that shot down MH17?