WHY IS DAVID BOWIE BEING SO WORSHIPPED?

A few weeks ago Lemmy of Motor head died. At the time many celebrities spoke of how great a man Lemmy was: hellraiser, life and soul of the party; spoke his mind. All that kind of stuff was said. But in the subsequent days after his death, among all the tributes I never once heard anyone mention his fascination for Nazi paraphernalia. He tried to dimiss this macabre fascination as one of either just an appreciation of their uniforms, or stating that nobody was less Nazi than him. But I don't collect Nazi paraphernalia. My friends and family don't. Do you? Do your friends and family collect Nazi paraphernalia? Do their friends and family? I posted an interview of Lemmy by John Robb and posted some photos of his collection in WHY DON'T YOU COLLECT NAZI MEMORABILIA? which questioned Lemmy's interest in Nazi paraphernalia, suggesting that it was much, much more than just an appreciation of their uniforms, as shown by the many, many Nazi daggers, swords and flags on his walls (and that was just what we got to see!).

On the same day that Lemmy died, the drummer of The Specials, John Bradbury, also died. As a member of The Specials campaigned to free Nelson Mandela.

But whose death got the vast majority of the coverage?

Yaarrp. Lemmy, the closet Nazi, the bottle-of-Jack-Daniels-a-day, the shagged-1000-women man.

Another musician died today: David Bowie.

My view of Bowie is; good musician but a fucking weirdo and possible tool of the global elite.

I have some appreciation of Bowie's music but not his alter egos.

But I would like to bring your attention to two aspects of Bowie.

First, his questionable sexuality. Just last week, a former landlady of his, with whom he had an affair, wrote in the newspapers that she was surprised when he began to 'confess' to his homo/bisexuality, and she thought it was so fake. So do I. So why would Bowie 'pretend' to be homo/bisexual? Was it fake? Or was he pushing an agenda? Recall that in 1969 Dr Richard Day stated that homo and bisexuality would be pushed as part of the "anything goes" agenda to reduce population.

But I think the second is the most disturbing. This is Bowie speaking during an interview that was published by the NME in August 1975:

"You've got to have an extreme right front come up and sweep everything off its feet and tidy everything up. Then you can get a new form of liberalism.

"There's some form of ghost force liberalism permeating the air in America, but it's got to go, because it's got no foundation at all, apart from a set of laws that were established way back in the bloody '50s and early '60s and have no bearing at all in the '70s. (The Supreme Court in America was at its most liberal in the late '50s, early '60s.)

"So the best thing that can happen is for an extreme right Government to come. It'll do something positive at least to the cause commotion in people and they'll either accept the dictatorship or get rid of it.

[source : Classic David Bowie Interview: Adolf Hitler And The Need For A New Right, The Quietus, http://thequietus.com/articles/03598-david-bowie-nme-interview-about-adolf-hitler-and-new-nazi-rock-movement, 25th January 2010]

And here he is again, this time quoted in Playboy calling for a fascist leader in Great Britain:

Britain is ready for a fascist leader...I think Britain could benefit from a fascist leader. After all, fascism is really nationalism...I believe very strongly in fascism, people have always responded with greater efficiency under a regimental leadership…Adolf Hitler was one of the first rock stars...You’ve got to have an extreme right front come up and sweep everything off its feet and tidy everything up.

[source : The MU’s response to David Bowie’s “Nazi” salute, The Musicians' Union: A Social History, http://www.muhistory.com/from-the-archive-2-mu-response-to-david-bowies-nazi-salute/, 6th October 2012]

Yaarrp. Bowie called for extreme right fascist Government dictatorships in both the UK and USA!!

And that second source, Musician's History, decribes how that quotation from Bowie contributed to the creation of the Rock Against Racism movement.

Now, his apologists dismiss this as due to very excessive cocaine use. Really? Yes. Really. You mean we are supposed to idolise David Bowie who called for extreme fascist governmnents in the UK and USA...but he called for this because he was totally fucked up on cocaine?!

Er, I don't think so.

So let's just recap what has happened in the last few weeks:
1. Lemmy dies, he was praised as a 'hellraiser' but he was actually a closet Nazi (do you collect Nazi daggers and swords and try dismiss this as an appreciation of Nazi uniforms?), and the mainstream media dedicates so much time to his death;
2. David Bowie dies, he was praised as a 'rebel', but he too was a closet Nazi who pushed the bisexual/transgender "anything goes" agenda, and the mainstream media dedicates so much time to his death;
3. John Bradbury dies (the same day as Lemmy), but there is barely a whisper of his death in the mainstream media. Why? Was it because Bradbury had no hint of being a Nazi and had actually campaigned to free Nelson Mandela?