We in this Disunited Fascist Kingdom desperately need a new banking system.
For years we have been tricked into ignoring the banks in the United States that quickly made the USA a threat to the British Empire; The First and Second Banks of the United States.
Michael Kirsch and Anton Chaitkin destroyed the myth of the traitor Andrew Jackson, who destroyed The Second Bank of The United States as a plot to wreck the economy of the USA for the British Empire.
Kirsch has now presented draft legislation for a bank modelled on the The First and Second Banks of the United States. This is free and available at http://larouchepac.com/restorethebank
Kirsch also spoke a few weeks ago describing this draft legislation. The video of this is available to watch at http://larouchepac.com/node/25457
This is exactly what we need in this DFK...now.
Thursday, February 28, 2013
Wednesday, February 27, 2013
LITVINENKO EVIDENCE WITHHELD BY BRITISH GOVERNMENT AND HOW THIS LINKS TO SYRIA
The British Government has been accused of withholding evidence from the inquest into the radioactive Russian traitor Alexander Litvinenko, whose wife Marina believes this is being done to protect trade between Great Britain and Russia.
On September 11th 2001 four passenger planes were allegedly hijacked and flown around the North East sector of American airspace for nearly two hours before flying into the the WTC 1 and 2 and even the flipping Pentagon without any shot being fired. Shortly after this General Wesley Clark was told in two different meetings how the USA would engage in war and regime change in seven nations in five years. The nations named to Clark were Iraq, Lebanon, Libya, Syria, Sudan, Somalia and Iran. Most of these had previously been named in two Zionist warmongering documents, A Clean Break and Rebuilding America's Defenses, the latter explicitly stating that a "new Pearl Harbor" would be required to transform the opinion of the American public to go on such a bloody rampage.
So Iraq was invaded in 2003 based the pretext that Iraq had been involved in 9/11 and had WMD. Neither was true.
There was a small war contrived by Israel on Lebanon in 2006.
But by 2007 this plan revealed to Clark was moribund. So an agreement was reached between Israel, Saudi Arabia and the USA to unleash cutthroat Jihadis onto several of the nations named to Clark. Libya was the first to suffer this plague of cutthroat Jihadi locusts. Since killing Gaddafi, an ally in the war on terror having given the names of suspected al Qaeda to CIA and MI6, these Jihadis have been busy in North Africa and Syria.
And so to Syria.
Last year there was enormous pressure placed on Russia to support an invasion and/or military intervention in Syria. Russia has refused. Russia waited and investigated the massacres that the NATO media screamed had been committed by Assad, and found such allegations false or inconclusive. So any kind of evidence that could put further pressure on Russia to acquiesce in the destruction of Syria and the replacement of Assad would be very useful.
So to recap:
1. a cabal of kiddie-fiddling warmongering megalomaniacs did the inside job 9/11 to get at nations like Iraq, Syria and Iran. Their plan stalled so they have unleashed an uncontrollable plague of cutthroat Jihadi locusts onto a number of nations, one of them currently Syria.
2. Russia has rejected military intervention in Syria, despite enormous pressure following several false flag massacres blamed by NATO media on Assad and his supporters.
So if the British government had evidence that Russia was indeed behind the death of the radioactive Russian traitor Litvinenko would that evidence not be released to put even more pressure on Russia to relent and allow military intervention in Syria?
What we have seen in this controversial death from the British government is lots and lots of finger pointing but very little hard evidence. And when prompted to provide such evidence the British government hides behind Public interest immunity (PII).
For years it was just rumour and idle speculation that Litvinenko was actually working for MI6. It has only recently been confirmed that this was in fact the case. Litvinenko even had his own handler "Martin" and his private mobile number.
So I think the question is, at the moment which is more important: some small trade agreements between Great Britain and Russia, or kicking Assad out of Syria to eventually get Iran?
And remember, they did the inside job 9/11 to get these nations!
I believe the latter. Only yesterday it was announced that the USA has broadened the definition of non-lethal aid to include virtually everything except rifles and heavy artillery, so that now the al Qaeda rebs will receive armour-plated vests and armoured personnel carriers from the USA and the guns, artillery and ammo from Saudi Arabia and Qatar. This shows just how much ousting Assad means to them.
On September 11th 2001 four passenger planes were allegedly hijacked and flown around the North East sector of American airspace for nearly two hours before flying into the the WTC 1 and 2 and even the flipping Pentagon without any shot being fired. Shortly after this General Wesley Clark was told in two different meetings how the USA would engage in war and regime change in seven nations in five years. The nations named to Clark were Iraq, Lebanon, Libya, Syria, Sudan, Somalia and Iran. Most of these had previously been named in two Zionist warmongering documents, A Clean Break and Rebuilding America's Defenses, the latter explicitly stating that a "new Pearl Harbor" would be required to transform the opinion of the American public to go on such a bloody rampage.
So Iraq was invaded in 2003 based the pretext that Iraq had been involved in 9/11 and had WMD. Neither was true.
There was a small war contrived by Israel on Lebanon in 2006.
But by 2007 this plan revealed to Clark was moribund. So an agreement was reached between Israel, Saudi Arabia and the USA to unleash cutthroat Jihadis onto several of the nations named to Clark. Libya was the first to suffer this plague of cutthroat Jihadi locusts. Since killing Gaddafi, an ally in the war on terror having given the names of suspected al Qaeda to CIA and MI6, these Jihadis have been busy in North Africa and Syria.
And so to Syria.
Last year there was enormous pressure placed on Russia to support an invasion and/or military intervention in Syria. Russia has refused. Russia waited and investigated the massacres that the NATO media screamed had been committed by Assad, and found such allegations false or inconclusive. So any kind of evidence that could put further pressure on Russia to acquiesce in the destruction of Syria and the replacement of Assad would be very useful.
So to recap:
1. a cabal of kiddie-fiddling warmongering megalomaniacs did the inside job 9/11 to get at nations like Iraq, Syria and Iran. Their plan stalled so they have unleashed an uncontrollable plague of cutthroat Jihadi locusts onto a number of nations, one of them currently Syria.
2. Russia has rejected military intervention in Syria, despite enormous pressure following several false flag massacres blamed by NATO media on Assad and his supporters.
So if the British government had evidence that Russia was indeed behind the death of the radioactive Russian traitor Litvinenko would that evidence not be released to put even more pressure on Russia to relent and allow military intervention in Syria?
What we have seen in this controversial death from the British government is lots and lots of finger pointing but very little hard evidence. And when prompted to provide such evidence the British government hides behind Public interest immunity (PII).
For years it was just rumour and idle speculation that Litvinenko was actually working for MI6. It has only recently been confirmed that this was in fact the case. Litvinenko even had his own handler "Martin" and his private mobile number.
So I think the question is, at the moment which is more important: some small trade agreements between Great Britain and Russia, or kicking Assad out of Syria to eventually get Iran?
And remember, they did the inside job 9/11 to get these nations!
I believe the latter. Only yesterday it was announced that the USA has broadened the definition of non-lethal aid to include virtually everything except rifles and heavy artillery, so that now the al Qaeda rebs will receive armour-plated vests and armoured personnel carriers from the USA and the guns, artillery and ammo from Saudi Arabia and Qatar. This shows just how much ousting Assad means to them.
Monday, February 25, 2013
THEY DID THE INSIDE JOB 9/11 TO GET IRAN
They did 9/11 to get Iran.
Iran is named in A Clean Break, Rebuilding America's Defenses and was named to General Wesley Clark shortly after the inside job 9/11.
They will not let Iran stand up to them.
Hence my scepticism in the historically inaccurate and anti-Iran film Argo winning Best Picture.
Assad is still in power, with growing support from the Syrian people, but Syria is broken and weak.
Iran is named in A Clean Break, Rebuilding America's Defenses and was named to General Wesley Clark shortly after the inside job 9/11.
They will not let Iran stand up to them.
Hence my scepticism in the historically inaccurate and anti-Iran film Argo winning Best Picture.
Assad is still in power, with growing support from the Syrian people, but Syria is broken and weak.
BEST PICTURE
The historically inaccurate and anti-Iran film Argo has won Best Picture at this year's Oscars.
This does not bode well.
The director Ben Affleck was not nominated for Best Director. So what is it about the film that deserves Best Picture award if the direction was not worthy of nomination?
This does not bode well.
The director Ben Affleck was not nominated for Best Director. So what is it about the film that deserves Best Picture award if the direction was not worthy of nomination?
Tuesday, February 19, 2013
THIS IS WHAT DID IT FOR ME ME ME
Shostakovich Symphonies 5, 6, 7, 8 and 10.
But this...
Maybe just for this lifetime...
STARLIGHT - NUMERO UNO
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2tPQD2DUo20
But this...
Maybe just for this lifetime...
STARLIGHT - NUMERO UNO
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2tPQD2DUo20
TIGER FEET
Oh dear!
Yet another...
The Sugar Hill Gang - Rappers Delight ( Ben Liebrand Mix )
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Np6Txx8otig&feature=related
Yet another...
The Sugar Hill Gang - Rappers Delight ( Ben Liebrand Mix )
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Np6Txx8otig&feature=related
COME ALIVE
Another Legends classic!
But instead of making love in London we should march on and storm our Paedo Parliament and make a citizen's arrest of a few paedos...
Orchestra JB - Come Alive
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KYQZcFIylNE&feature=related
But instead of making love in London we should march on and storm our Paedo Parliament and make a citizen's arrest of a few paedos...
Orchestra JB - Come Alive
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KYQZcFIylNE&feature=related
Monday, February 18, 2013
ISRAEL DESPERATE TO BLAME HEZBOLLAH FOR BURGAS
The Bulgarian Foreign Minister is to present evidence to the EU this week that Hezbollah executed the bombing of a bus in Burgas, Bulgaria last July.
The evidence is flimsy at best.
The real identities of the suspects are still unknown, and no names have been provided. So how can Bulgaria blame Hezbollah? Because forged licences were printed on a printer somehow traced to Lebanon, and apparently there was a small increase in phone calls between Bulgaria and Lebanon in the days before the bombing.
And that is about it!
This kind of 'evidence' could be very easily fabricated.
And is it not highly suspicious that within hours of the bombing Benjamin Netanyahu had convicted Iran and Hezbollah and suggested that we must bomb Iran because the bombers were on their way to London to bomb the Olympic Games?
So why would Hezbollah bomb Jews in Bulgaria? Now that is a tough question. Hezbollah would have nothing to gain by bombing a few Jews in Bulgaria. Some 'experts' have suggested that Iran through Hezbollah retaliated to the blatant assassinations by Israel of Iranian nuclear scientists. But Bulgaria is one of a handful of nations who have formally recognised Palestine as a state. And by bombing in Bulgaria, inside the EU, this would give Israel the perfect opportunity to demand sanctions against Hezbollah, maybe a freeze on Hezbollah's assets in Europe.
Here is what Haaretz is reporting.
So here it appears as though the bomber's DNA is not recognised, and somehow the printer used for the creation of forged driver's licences was traced to Lebanon!
This excerpt from a report in The Washington Post just about sums the situation up.
So here is the WP basically saying the identities of the suspects are unknown, or if they are known then for some strange reason they are not being released, thus giving the suspects chance to escape! And the EU currently considers Hezbollah a legitimate political organisation.
So that is it. That is the strongest evidence that Bulgaria has to convict Hezbollah. Forged licences printed by a printer in Lebanon, dodgy unknown DNA and a few phone calls between Bulgaria and Lebanon.
WHAT A LOAD OF BULLSHIT!
And what is more suspicious about how the Bulgarian Foreign Minister concluded that Hezbollah was behind the Burgas bombing is his relationship with the USA. Mladenov's Wikipedia page lists that he went to Kings College London to gain a MA in War Studies, and later ran Soros' Open Society in Bulgaria. He then joined The World Bank. He has since developed deep links between the USA and Bulgaria. He stinks of an insider; pro-European integration, pro-USA.
But would Israel bomb a bus in Bulgaria to blame Hezbollah to frame Hezbollah, to get it blacklisted so that its assets in Europe were taken?
I can name two very high profile events from which Israel benefited but is the prime suspect.
The first is the inside job 9/11. Francesco Cossiga stated in 2007 that most of the world's intelligence agencies know that Israel with the USA itself did 9/11. Jews died on 9/11.
The second is the assassination of Rafik Hariri in Beirut in February 2005.
Both of these apparently unconnected events are actually joined at the hip. This is because 9/11 was executed to implement a plan laid out in A Clean Break and Rebuilding America's Defenses, two documents written by the same cabal of Zionutters. General Wesley Clark was told shortly after the inside job 9/11 that there would be war and regime change in seven nations in five years. Those seven nations were Iraq, Lebanon, Libya, Syria, Sudan, Somalia and Iran. The war in Lebanon occured in 2006. It was a war contrived by Israel, as admitted by Olmert. But before this war The Special Tribunal for Lebanon first accused Syria of the assassination of Hariri, which led to The Cedar Revolution and the withdrawal by Syria from Lebanon. The evidence against Syria was later found to be a load of bollocks. So the STL blamed Hezbollah and said that it would present the evidence. Over TWO YEARS LATER and that evidence has not been presented. However Hezbollah has presented evidence that it claims implicates Israel. That evidence consists of hacked communications from Israeli drones flying illegally over Beirut tracking Hariri's movements.
Every event in the Middle East and North Africa on and since 11th September 2001 is due to Israeli aggression. Israel was created by Zionists, themselves traumatised by the Holocaust, terrorising nearly a million Palestinians off their farms and lands. Terror is in the DNA of Zionism.
I am deeply deeply sceptical that Hezbollah was behind Burgas. Hezbollah had everything to lose, while Israel had everything to gain...and has form.
And the 'evidence' is very poor at best and could be easily fabricated.
The evidence is flimsy at best.
The real identities of the suspects are still unknown, and no names have been provided. So how can Bulgaria blame Hezbollah? Because forged licences were printed on a printer somehow traced to Lebanon, and apparently there was a small increase in phone calls between Bulgaria and Lebanon in the days before the bombing.
And that is about it!
This kind of 'evidence' could be very easily fabricated.
And is it not highly suspicious that within hours of the bombing Benjamin Netanyahu had convicted Iran and Hezbollah and suggested that we must bomb Iran because the bombers were on their way to London to bomb the Olympic Games?
So why would Hezbollah bomb Jews in Bulgaria? Now that is a tough question. Hezbollah would have nothing to gain by bombing a few Jews in Bulgaria. Some 'experts' have suggested that Iran through Hezbollah retaliated to the blatant assassinations by Israel of Iranian nuclear scientists. But Bulgaria is one of a handful of nations who have formally recognised Palestine as a state. And by bombing in Bulgaria, inside the EU, this would give Israel the perfect opportunity to demand sanctions against Hezbollah, maybe a freeze on Hezbollah's assets in Europe.
Here is what Haaretz is reporting.
DNA samples of his [the suspected suicide bomber on the bus] were sent to several Western intelligence agencies but none of them could find a match to anyone in their records. The only clue that connected him to the terrorists who survived and fled was a SIM card and a forged Canadian driver’s license that were found in a small town on the Bulgarian-Romanian border. The items, which belonged to a cell member who got away, had DNA traces that were very similar to the DNA of the suicide terrorist. The forged driver’s licenses that all three of them carried yielded the most significant smoking gun, since with the help of foreign intelligence sources the Bulgarians managed to locate the printer that had produced the forged documents − and it wasn’t in Canada or in the United States, but in Lebanon.
...The investigation found that there was an increase in the number of calls between Burgas and Lebanon in the days that preceded the attack, among them several suspicious calls that were apparently between the cell members and Hezbollah officials.
[source : Bulgaria to reveal how it traced Hezbollah to deadly attack on Israeli tourists in Burgas, Haaretz, http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/bulgaria-to-reveal-how-it-traced-hezbollah-to-deadly-attack-on-israeli-tourists-in-burgas-1.504124, Haaretz]
So here it appears as though the bomber's DNA is not recognised, and somehow the printer used for the creation of forged driver's licences was traced to Lebanon!
This excerpt from a report in The Washington Post just about sums the situation up.
Three men are suspected in the attack, including the bomber.
The latter’s identity has not been established. The names of the two other suspects, believed to still be alive, have not been made public.
The European Union, of which Bulgaria is a member, which regards Hezbollah as a legitimate political organization and has resisted calls to blacklist the group or declare it a terrorist organization.
[source : Hezbollah says no comment on Bulgarian report blaming it for killing Israelis in July, WP, http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/middle_east/hezbollah-refuses-to-comment-on-bulgarian-report-on-july-bombing-that-killed-5-israelis/2013/02/16/6c958248-784f-11e2-b102-948929030e64_story.html, 16th February 2013]
So here is the WP basically saying the identities of the suspects are unknown, or if they are known then for some strange reason they are not being released, thus giving the suspects chance to escape! And the EU currently considers Hezbollah a legitimate political organisation.
So that is it. That is the strongest evidence that Bulgaria has to convict Hezbollah. Forged licences printed by a printer in Lebanon, dodgy unknown DNA and a few phone calls between Bulgaria and Lebanon.
WHAT A LOAD OF BULLSHIT!
And what is more suspicious about how the Bulgarian Foreign Minister concluded that Hezbollah was behind the Burgas bombing is his relationship with the USA. Mladenov's Wikipedia page lists that he went to Kings College London to gain a MA in War Studies, and later ran Soros' Open Society in Bulgaria. He then joined The World Bank. He has since developed deep links between the USA and Bulgaria. He stinks of an insider; pro-European integration, pro-USA.
But would Israel bomb a bus in Bulgaria to blame Hezbollah to frame Hezbollah, to get it blacklisted so that its assets in Europe were taken?
I can name two very high profile events from which Israel benefited but is the prime suspect.
The first is the inside job 9/11. Francesco Cossiga stated in 2007 that most of the world's intelligence agencies know that Israel with the USA itself did 9/11. Jews died on 9/11.
The second is the assassination of Rafik Hariri in Beirut in February 2005.
Both of these apparently unconnected events are actually joined at the hip. This is because 9/11 was executed to implement a plan laid out in A Clean Break and Rebuilding America's Defenses, two documents written by the same cabal of Zionutters. General Wesley Clark was told shortly after the inside job 9/11 that there would be war and regime change in seven nations in five years. Those seven nations were Iraq, Lebanon, Libya, Syria, Sudan, Somalia and Iran. The war in Lebanon occured in 2006. It was a war contrived by Israel, as admitted by Olmert. But before this war The Special Tribunal for Lebanon first accused Syria of the assassination of Hariri, which led to The Cedar Revolution and the withdrawal by Syria from Lebanon. The evidence against Syria was later found to be a load of bollocks. So the STL blamed Hezbollah and said that it would present the evidence. Over TWO YEARS LATER and that evidence has not been presented. However Hezbollah has presented evidence that it claims implicates Israel. That evidence consists of hacked communications from Israeli drones flying illegally over Beirut tracking Hariri's movements.
Every event in the Middle East and North Africa on and since 11th September 2001 is due to Israeli aggression. Israel was created by Zionists, themselves traumatised by the Holocaust, terrorising nearly a million Palestinians off their farms and lands. Terror is in the DNA of Zionism.
I am deeply deeply sceptical that Hezbollah was behind Burgas. Hezbollah had everything to lose, while Israel had everything to gain...and has form.
And the 'evidence' is very poor at best and could be easily fabricated.
Sunday, February 17, 2013
SURPRISES AND COINCIDENCES
Argo has been the 'surprise' winner of film awards this season. The film is based in Iran around the time of the Iranian Revolution of 1979, and is directed by Ben Affleck. The film has been made and released at a very curious time. Iran has been the ultimate target of Israeli aggression for decades. Israel, with the assistance of the USA and Saudi Arabia, did 9/11 to implement a plan that had been proposed in two documents, A Clean Break and Rebuilding America's Defenses, and revealed to General Wesley Clark when he was told shortly after the inside job 9/11 that the USA would wage war and regime change on seven nations in five years. Those seven nations were:
Iraq (2003)
Lebanon (2006)
Libya (2011)
Syria (ongoing through NATO proxy terrorist scum supplied by Saudi Arabia)
Sudan
Somalia
Iran
Clark was told this in late 2001. It is now early 2013, and of those seven nations only two have had their governments changed, Iraq and Libya. Lebanon was dragged into a small war in 2006. But by 2007 this plan was moribund, so as revealed by Seymour Hersh in The Redirection the true Axis-of-Evil, the USA, Saudi Arabia and Israel, had reached an agreement that Saudi Arabia would unleash vicious cutthroat Jihadis onto Libya and Syria. In 2011 NATO twisted UN SCR 1973 out of all recognition and bombed and bombed and bombed and bombed and bombed and bombed and bombed and bombed and bombed and bombed and bombed a clear and unobstructed path for these Jihadis all the way into Tripoli to illegally kill Gaddafi, having first trained and advised them in the battlefield through special forces of Qatar, UK and France. Those same Jihadis were then transported to Turkey to attack Syria in a proxy covert war.
The heroes of 2012, the Syrian military, have so far been successful in stopping these cutthroat Jihadis from toppling Assad. However, Syria is weakened and may well be unable to assist Iran should a war on Iran begin.
But it looks like the 'people' who dreamed up this plan for war and regime change in seven nations in five years and kicked it all off via the inside job 9/11 are going to see it through. War on Iran is the plan. So it is no surprise that a film portraying Iran as a huge threat to the USA has been made and released at this time.
But can you remember what other film Ben Affleck is associated with that I think helped to prepare America to go to war after 9/11? Affleck was one of the stars of Michael Bay's Pearl Harbor. There had already been one film, Tora! Tora! Tora!, made about the Japanese attack on the US port in Hawaii in 1941, an attack that could have been stopped. Pearl Harbor claimed to be historically accurate, but it wasn't, and I found some curious coincidences with numbers and symbolism in that film. I believe that Pearl Harbor was made to remind the USA of a surprise attack and what could be done about it, to prepare the American public for that transformation of society as proposed in Rebuilding America's Defenses which suggested that "a new Pearl Harbor" was needed to convince the American public to wage simultaneous wars across the globe.
Is it just 'coincidence' that Affleck has directed this anti-Iran film at a time when the Establishment through the Zionist entity is desperate to start war on Iran?
And just how accurate is Argo? Apparently not very. One of the characters in the film, the Canadian Ambassador to Iran at the time of the revolution, has criticised the accuracy of the film.
So we have Affleck, who starred in the historically inaccurate but very emotional Pearl Harbor with lots of symbolism, now directing a historically inaccurate anti-Iran film when war on Iran is the ultimate plan, and that film is the 'surprise' winner of award after award after award.
Surprise?
Coincidence?
NOT BLOODY LIKELY!
Iraq (2003)
Lebanon (2006)
Libya (2011)
Syria (ongoing through NATO proxy terrorist scum supplied by Saudi Arabia)
Sudan
Somalia
Iran
Clark was told this in late 2001. It is now early 2013, and of those seven nations only two have had their governments changed, Iraq and Libya. Lebanon was dragged into a small war in 2006. But by 2007 this plan was moribund, so as revealed by Seymour Hersh in The Redirection the true Axis-of-Evil, the USA, Saudi Arabia and Israel, had reached an agreement that Saudi Arabia would unleash vicious cutthroat Jihadis onto Libya and Syria. In 2011 NATO twisted UN SCR 1973 out of all recognition and bombed and bombed and bombed and bombed and bombed and bombed and bombed and bombed and bombed and bombed and bombed a clear and unobstructed path for these Jihadis all the way into Tripoli to illegally kill Gaddafi, having first trained and advised them in the battlefield through special forces of Qatar, UK and France. Those same Jihadis were then transported to Turkey to attack Syria in a proxy covert war.
The heroes of 2012, the Syrian military, have so far been successful in stopping these cutthroat Jihadis from toppling Assad. However, Syria is weakened and may well be unable to assist Iran should a war on Iran begin.
But it looks like the 'people' who dreamed up this plan for war and regime change in seven nations in five years and kicked it all off via the inside job 9/11 are going to see it through. War on Iran is the plan. So it is no surprise that a film portraying Iran as a huge threat to the USA has been made and released at this time.
But can you remember what other film Ben Affleck is associated with that I think helped to prepare America to go to war after 9/11? Affleck was one of the stars of Michael Bay's Pearl Harbor. There had already been one film, Tora! Tora! Tora!, made about the Japanese attack on the US port in Hawaii in 1941, an attack that could have been stopped. Pearl Harbor claimed to be historically accurate, but it wasn't, and I found some curious coincidences with numbers and symbolism in that film. I believe that Pearl Harbor was made to remind the USA of a surprise attack and what could be done about it, to prepare the American public for that transformation of society as proposed in Rebuilding America's Defenses which suggested that "a new Pearl Harbor" was needed to convince the American public to wage simultaneous wars across the globe.
Is it just 'coincidence' that Affleck has directed this anti-Iran film at a time when the Establishment through the Zionist entity is desperate to start war on Iran?
And just how accurate is Argo? Apparently not very. One of the characters in the film, the Canadian Ambassador to Iran at the time of the revolution, has criticised the accuracy of the film.
Former Canadian Ambassador to Iran Ken Taylor has heavily criticized the anti-Iran American film Argo, saying that the screenwriter has “no idea what he's talking about."
“The amusing side is the script writer (Chris Terrio) in Hollywood had no idea what he's talking about,” Taylor said during an audience with Ryerson University students in Toronto on Thursday, CBC reports.
...Political analysts say Argo unmasks the elaborate US scheme to employ every medium in its propaganda apparatus to incite Iranophobia across the globe.
Observers have further lashed out at the director of Argo for portraying a stereotyped and caricatured view of the Iranian society and noted that Affleck has consciously sought to ridicule the very customs and traditions of Iran.
In mid-January, Iran announced plans to mount a big cinematic project on the 1979 US embassy incident to give a true image of the historical event distorted in Argo.
[source : ‘Argo’ writer has no idea what he's talking about: Ex-Canada envoy, Press TV, http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2013/02/17/289403/excanada-envoy-argo-got-it-all-wrong/, 17th February 2013]
So we have Affleck, who starred in the historically inaccurate but very emotional Pearl Harbor with lots of symbolism, now directing a historically inaccurate anti-Iran film when war on Iran is the ultimate plan, and that film is the 'surprise' winner of award after award after award.
Surprise?
Coincidence?
NOT BLOODY LIKELY!
Saturday, February 16, 2013
A ONE LEGGED SEX MACHINE?
THIS IS ONE REASON WHY I LOVE PLANET EARTH!
Some have their geographical reasons. But sometimes you just can't do anything but shake your head and laugh your head off!
Some have their geographical reasons. But sometimes you just can't do anything but shake your head and laugh your head off!
CROSS-DRESSING comic Eddie Izzard is related to a one-legged ‘sex machine’ who has fathered 93 kids – and has two more on the way!
Eddie made the discovery while researching his family’s DNA for a new BBC documentary.
He met his “ancestral cousin” – 64-year-old Daad Murad Al-Baluchi – in the United Arab Emirates while filming Meet The Izzards.
Eddie also found that his mother’s ancestors were Namibian bush people while his father’s family can be traced back to the Saxons.
Meet The Izzards on BBC1 next Wednesday and Thursday at 9pm.
Read more: http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/showbiz/tv/4797662/Eddie-Izzard-is-related-to-a-one-legged-sex-machine-reveals-BBC-doco.html#ixzz2L5RzfNDU
CHECK
Before reposting or linking to an article or blog please read what that publication or blog has suggested about you beforehand.
I am aware of one very well known writer who has recently been linking to blogs but from a blogger blogspot that has previously attacked him several times.
Once checked, ask why that spot began siding with that author and note the time that it occured.
I am aware of one very well known writer who has recently been linking to blogs but from a blogger blogspot that has previously attacked him several times.
Once checked, ask why that spot began siding with that author and note the time that it occured.
I CRIED
How spooky is this?
A Year 7 (i.e. first year, 11 year old) sang this solo beautifully in assembly last week. This is on the same day that a very important deja vu occured; not only the same day but time of day.
A Year 7 (i.e. first year, 11 year old) sang this solo beautifully in assembly last week. This is on the same day that a very important deja vu occured; not only the same day but time of day.
Tuesday, February 12, 2013
ANOTHER FACTOID
Gary Allen writes in None Dare Call It Conspiracy
No specific reference is given.
The problem here is that History of The Great American Fortunes by Gustav Myers is a THREE volume work!
And after some research this citation by Allen does not give any specific reference in History of The Great American Fortunes. However this is what Myers writes in Vol 3:
This reference Number 5 contains the Allen quote:
But Mullins in World Order p35 says that in the Panic of 1837 the Rothschilds let their agents W.L. & M.S. Joseph go under while they backed Belmont.
And on p4 Mullins states:
My question is : why does Mullins begin this alleged long time control over banking in the United States at 1837, AFTER the traitor Andrew Jackson had destroyed the Second Bank of the United States and the US economy?
Surely if W.L. & M.S. Joseph were so powerful we would be familiar with this name as we are with Belmont, Morgan, Loeb, etc.
This is not definite proof but supports the thesis that the Rothschilds had NOTHING to do with with The First or The Second Bank of The United States. There is a definite plot to portray these banks as having been under Rothschild control so that we do not look at them, study them and see how they financed the creation of the USA in it early years.
But, even though America did not have a central bank after President Jackson abolished it in 1836, the European financiers and their American agents managed to obtain a great deal of control over our monetary system. Gustavus Myers, in his History of The Great American Fortunes, reveals:
"Under the surface, the Rothschilds long had a powerful influence in dictating American financial laws. The law records show that they were powers in the old Bank of the United States [abolished by Andrew Jackson]."
No specific reference is given.
The problem here is that History of The Great American Fortunes by Gustav Myers is a THREE volume work!
And after some research this citation by Allen does not give any specific reference in History of The Great American Fortunes. However this is what Myers writes in Vol 3:
The two things worked well together. By means of financial laws, corruptly passed, the bankers, both international and national, compelled the people of the United States, through their Government, to present them with the funds with which to buy up railroads and other forms of property.5
This reference Number 5 contains the Allen quote:
5 Under the surface, the Rothschilds have long had a powerful influence in dictating American financial laws. The law records show that they were powers in the old Bank of the United States. August Belmont and Company were their American representatives. In 1873 it was estimated that $375,000,000 of American railroad securities were held abroad, chiefly by foreign bankers. The Final Report of the Industrial Commission in 1902 estimated (see page 404 of that report) the amount of these securities held by foreign banking houses and others abroad at about $3,100,000,000.
But Mullins in World Order p35 says that in the Panic of 1837 the Rothschilds let their agents W.L. & M.S. Joseph go under while they backed Belmont.
In 1931, W. Averell Harriman, son of E.H. Harriman, merged his banking house, W.A. Harriman & Co. with Brown Bros, to form the present firm of Brown Bros. Harriman. In 1933, Brown Bros. Harriman backed the expansion of CBS, in which they have maintained a large position. The Brown Bros, firm occupied offices on the comer of Wall Street and Hanover which had been occupied by J.L. & J.S. Joseph Co., the American representatives of the Rothschilds. Josephs went broke in the Panic of 1837, having been cut loose by the Rothschilds, who were now operating through August Belmont and George Peabody & Co.
And on p4 Mullins states:
For more than a century, a widespread belief has been deliberately fostered in the United States that the Rothschilds were of little significance in the American financial scene. With this cover, they have been able to manipulate political and financial developments in this country to their own advantage. In 1837, the Rothschilds let their American representative, W.L. & M.S. Joseph, go bankrupt in the Crash, while they threw their cash reserves behind a newcomer, August Belmont, and their secret representative, George Peabody of London. Bermingham notes in "Our Crowd", "In the Panic of 1837, Belmont was able to perform a service which he would repeat in subsequent panics, thanks to the hugeness of the Rothschild reservoir of capital, to start out in America operating his own Federal Reserve System."
After 1837, August Belmont (Schonberg) was publily advertised in the financial press as the American representative of the Rothschilds. When Belmont participated in a financial operation, everyone knew that the Rothschilds were involved. When Belmont took no part, and the transaction was handled by J.P. Morgan & Co., and or by Kuhn, Loeb Co., everyone "knew" that
the Rothschilds were not involved.
My question is : why does Mullins begin this alleged long time control over banking in the United States at 1837, AFTER the traitor Andrew Jackson had destroyed the Second Bank of the United States and the US economy?
Surely if W.L. & M.S. Joseph were so powerful we would be familiar with this name as we are with Belmont, Morgan, Loeb, etc.
This is not definite proof but supports the thesis that the Rothschilds had NOTHING to do with with The First or The Second Bank of The United States. There is a definite plot to portray these banks as having been under Rothschild control so that we do not look at them, study them and see how they financed the creation of the USA in it early years.
Sunday, February 10, 2013
THE SECOND BANK OF THE UNITED STATES IN THE GRAND SCHEME OF THINGS
The Second Bank of the United States (BUS2) was destroyed by the traitor Andrew Jackson and his anglophile handlers. Jackson hated paper money after losing most of his fortune in a bank crash. This was used by anglophiles to destroy the BUS2 which was financing the creation of a USA that was rapidly becoming a developed industrial nation and a threat to the British Empire.
Now, a lot of disinformation has been put out to portray Jackson as a hero for destroying the BUS2. Some claim, without evidence, that Biddle was an agent of the Rothschilds. These same people claim that Jackson hated the Rothschilds. But these same people do not address why Jackson made the Rothschilds the bankers to the USA!
The BUS2 and The Bank of England were privately-owned central banks. They issued the national currency which was created out of thin air based on a small quantity of specie. This is fact. The US government held only 20% of the stock of the BUS2. The rest, as Jackson pointed out, was held by investors, many of them European. The likes of Astor, Girard and Brown Brothers held stock in BUS2. So why would these kind of investors who held stock in the bank want to destroy it? Surely if their only motive was profit they would keep their investment in The BUS2? Apparently not. These particular investors pulled their investment before Jackson destroyed the bank. I would suggest that these particular investors did not like what Biddle was doing with the bank and the USA itself.
As yet nobody has explained the presence of the inverted, irregular and incomplete pentagram in the 1791 street plan of Washington DC that is directly North of The White House. I have recently read that John Quincy Adams, anti-Mason and pro-BUS2, accused Thomas Jefferson of being a member of The Illuminati. As I understand it only three men had control over the design of Washington DC; L'Enfant, Washington and Jefferson. Jefferson, like Jackson, did not trust paper money and banks being able to create money out of thin air. This power to create money out of thin air can be used for good or bad. Jefferson believed that only bad could come from this power, particularly if this power was given to privately owned banks. Hence Jefferson's famous banking quotes. But what Biddle, with support from Adams, did was to use this power to create money out of thin air for good. Under Biddle the USA was transformed within years.
I strongly believe that the USA had a destiny long before 1776, dating back 6000 years or so. The Freemasonic celebrations and ceremonies etc that occured during the founding of Washington DC prove this, as do the alignments of some streets and objects with the sun. The USA is the most powerful military nation on Earth, with bases in nearly every country on Earth. When you consider the White House pentagram and Moloch on the pyramid in the street plan of Washington DC I believe that it is highly probable that this was the destiny of America, to be the world's dominant nation, terrorising, invading, murdering, defrauding, etc. But the American revolutionaries of 1776 went a bit too...revolutionary, and took their freedom and the development of a free and prosperous USA very, very seriously indeed. The revolutionaries saw the power of creating money out of thin air as a force for good, not just evil like The Bank of England used it.
But for the USA to have this destiny it had to develop into that nation. I suggest that the BUS2 was creating an America that was overtaking The British Empire and was not under the control of the satanists who controlled England at the time. The USA had to develop into a world superpower but only at the correct rate. If the BUS2 had survived and built a free and prosperous America which was full of lovers of freedom, liberty and justice then it would have no doubt launched a devastating war on Great Britain and given that evil empire a jolly good thrashing.
This is probably not that revolutionary a suggestion, that the British Empire saw the USA as a threat. But history has been explained so far by two suggestions; the first is that the revolution of 1776 was genuine and had no other motive; the second is that the revolution was not genuine but was a giant hoax which was followed by the creation of a series of privately-owned banks.
This third suggestion combines my belief that the USA had a 6000 year old destiny, that the revolution was provoked to achieve that destiny, but things got a little out of hand and the revolutionaries took their revolution just a bit too seriously such that the USA could have reached its destiny not under the control of the satanists.
Anyway. What else does this mean other than the USA being a satanic force?
Now, a lot of disinformation has been put out to portray Jackson as a hero for destroying the BUS2. Some claim, without evidence, that Biddle was an agent of the Rothschilds. These same people claim that Jackson hated the Rothschilds. But these same people do not address why Jackson made the Rothschilds the bankers to the USA!
The BUS2 and The Bank of England were privately-owned central banks. They issued the national currency which was created out of thin air based on a small quantity of specie. This is fact. The US government held only 20% of the stock of the BUS2. The rest, as Jackson pointed out, was held by investors, many of them European. The likes of Astor, Girard and Brown Brothers held stock in BUS2. So why would these kind of investors who held stock in the bank want to destroy it? Surely if their only motive was profit they would keep their investment in The BUS2? Apparently not. These particular investors pulled their investment before Jackson destroyed the bank. I would suggest that these particular investors did not like what Biddle was doing with the bank and the USA itself.
As yet nobody has explained the presence of the inverted, irregular and incomplete pentagram in the 1791 street plan of Washington DC that is directly North of The White House. I have recently read that John Quincy Adams, anti-Mason and pro-BUS2, accused Thomas Jefferson of being a member of The Illuminati. As I understand it only three men had control over the design of Washington DC; L'Enfant, Washington and Jefferson. Jefferson, like Jackson, did not trust paper money and banks being able to create money out of thin air. This power to create money out of thin air can be used for good or bad. Jefferson believed that only bad could come from this power, particularly if this power was given to privately owned banks. Hence Jefferson's famous banking quotes. But what Biddle, with support from Adams, did was to use this power to create money out of thin air for good. Under Biddle the USA was transformed within years.
I strongly believe that the USA had a destiny long before 1776, dating back 6000 years or so. The Freemasonic celebrations and ceremonies etc that occured during the founding of Washington DC prove this, as do the alignments of some streets and objects with the sun. The USA is the most powerful military nation on Earth, with bases in nearly every country on Earth. When you consider the White House pentagram and Moloch on the pyramid in the street plan of Washington DC I believe that it is highly probable that this was the destiny of America, to be the world's dominant nation, terrorising, invading, murdering, defrauding, etc. But the American revolutionaries of 1776 went a bit too...revolutionary, and took their freedom and the development of a free and prosperous USA very, very seriously indeed. The revolutionaries saw the power of creating money out of thin air as a force for good, not just evil like The Bank of England used it.
But for the USA to have this destiny it had to develop into that nation. I suggest that the BUS2 was creating an America that was overtaking The British Empire and was not under the control of the satanists who controlled England at the time. The USA had to develop into a world superpower but only at the correct rate. If the BUS2 had survived and built a free and prosperous America which was full of lovers of freedom, liberty and justice then it would have no doubt launched a devastating war on Great Britain and given that evil empire a jolly good thrashing.
This is probably not that revolutionary a suggestion, that the British Empire saw the USA as a threat. But history has been explained so far by two suggestions; the first is that the revolution of 1776 was genuine and had no other motive; the second is that the revolution was not genuine but was a giant hoax which was followed by the creation of a series of privately-owned banks.
This third suggestion combines my belief that the USA had a 6000 year old destiny, that the revolution was provoked to achieve that destiny, but things got a little out of hand and the revolutionaries took their revolution just a bit too seriously such that the USA could have reached its destiny not under the control of the satanists.
Anyway. What else does this mean other than the USA being a satanic force?
MAKING EVEN MORE SENSE OF EUSTACE MULLINS AND EZRA POUND
Secrets of The Federal Reserve by Eustace Mullins is considered to be one of the classics in conspiracy theory literature, describing how international bankers took control of America. I believed in it for years, but always had this little niggle in the back of my mind that something was not right about it. Its general flow, its narrative had something to it; it sounded, felt, seemed right...but then again not quite.
In the last month or so I have been driven to find out what that little niggle in the back of my mind was. And I believe I have found the problem.
To start, Mullins says that Ezra Pound paid him to write about The Federal Reserve. At the time Pound was locked up in a psychiatric hospital waiting to be tried for treason after ranting against FDR and Jews from fascist Italy during WW2. Pound was a strong supporter of Martin van Buren and Andrew Jackson. The recent works of Anton Chaitkin and Michael Kirsch destroy the image of van Buren and Jackson as heroes waging war on the international bankers.
So what were Pound's sources? Here is a small list of Ezra Pound's sources. This is beginning to make more sense. Pound's view of van Buren and thus Jackson is due to van Buren himself! To be more specific van Buren's autobiography.
Yesterday I hinted that maybe while in hospital something happened to Pound. Well get this. His doctor was apparently working for what would become the MK Ultra program! This devastating information comes from a Beatrice Mott who claims to have been a friend of Mullins towards the end of his life.
Here is Mott describing Pound's time in hospital.
Mott also hints that perhaps Mullins' research and referencing skills could have been better, giving examples of when she asked Mullins for specific references to back up statements in the book Mullins would evade giving the reference, and would often simply reply that it is all in The Library of Congress. However, Mott also hints that maybe there was more to Mullins.
Pound's war time radio rants were compiled by Leonard Doob and published as Ezra Pound Speaking. Pound is very close to the truth, except for his love of van Buren and Jackson. It would make sense for the NWO to get at Pound, incarcerate him for years in a hospital that was linked to the CIA with a doctor linked to the CIA and then allow an unknown 'writer' to befriend him to write lots of anti-Semitic books that are poorly referenced. I mean, do we have any proof that Pound paid Mullins? Any receipts? If Pound did not pay Mullins then how did Mullins finance himself while allegedly spending day after day after day reading virtually everything in The Library of Congress?
As with all disinformation, there is a lot of true fact but this is obscured by bad untrue information. The Second Bank of The United States was a good bank. It was rapidly creating a United States that threatened the British Empire. So according to the British it had to be destroyed. Van Buren and Jackson did this as agents of The British Empire. And Van Buren would not declare this in his autobiography, now would he? Van Buren would portray himself and his allies as heroes. Such a bank as The Second Bank of The United States must be made to appear bad so that nobody would ever dare suggest creating such a bank again. Hence Secrets of The Federal Reserve? Because that is the source that is cited by many as providing the definitive history of banking in the USA. Documentaries have been based on the work of Mullins. Books too. However, Mullins stated that Henry Clews stated several facts about The Bank of England and the Rothschilds. But when you read Clews' book Clews does not make those statements. If anything Clews blames Jackson for screwing up the economy!
This is making much more sense of Eustace Mullins and Ezra Pound and the little unsourced factoids in Mullins' books. The one little unsourced factoid that I have as yet been unable to source has been the claim that Biddle was an agent of the Rothschilds. I am prepared to believe that for whatever reason Mullins made that one up!
For who would challenge an author, the oracle, who allegedly spent years reading nearly everything in The Library of Congress?
In the last month or so I have been driven to find out what that little niggle in the back of my mind was. And I believe I have found the problem.
To start, Mullins says that Ezra Pound paid him to write about The Federal Reserve. At the time Pound was locked up in a psychiatric hospital waiting to be tried for treason after ranting against FDR and Jews from fascist Italy during WW2. Pound was a strong supporter of Martin van Buren and Andrew Jackson. The recent works of Anton Chaitkin and Michael Kirsch destroy the image of van Buren and Jackson as heroes waging war on the international bankers.
So what were Pound's sources? Here is a small list of Ezra Pound's sources. This is beginning to make more sense. Pound's view of van Buren and thus Jackson is due to van Buren himself! To be more specific van Buren's autobiography.
Ezra Pound
In the 1930s, when Martin Van Buren was mostly forgotten as a national figure, an unlikely champion of the eighth president emerged: the poet Ezra Pound. Embittered by the awesome destruction of World War I, Pound settled in Italy in the 1930s and embraced fascism and anti-Semitic conspiracy theories about Jewish financiers. Against the backdrop of Europe in tumult he produced one of his most famous works, The Cantos, his epic-length poem divided into 120 sections. Pound cites hundreds of figures in his unwieldy polemic on society, culture and government. He had special admiration for the Jeffersonians he saw as enemies of the Bank of the United States, particularly Andrew Jackson and Van Buren. In Cantos XXXVII (1934), Pound opens, “‘Thou shalt not,’ said Martin Van Buren, ‘jail ‘em for debt.’ ” He quotes parts from Van Buren’s Autobiography in the poem: “From the real committee of Bank’s directors the government’s directors have been excluded … Bank president controlling government’s funds to the betrayal of the nation … government funds obstructing the government … and has sequestered the said funds of the government … acting in illegal secret, pouring oil on the press, giving nominal loans on inexistent security … on precedent that Mr. Hamilton has never hesitated to jeopard the general for advance of particular interests.”
The Cantos is not the only time Pound praised Van Buren. In a letter to the poet Harriet Monroe, Pound called him a “a national hero,” whose story was one of the “few clean and decent pages” in American history. Pound’s history is faulty. He saw Van Buren as a resolute foe of banks when he was merely critical of their excesses—a liberal but hardly radical view in his time. Van Buren was clear in his positions and his letters that he was no enemy of state banks. To be fair to Pound, he did not have the scholarship we have today to work with. He noted that his sources for Van Buren included Edward M. Shephard’s 1888 biography, George Bancroft’s Martin Van Buren to the End of His Public Career (1889) and, of course, the Autobiography. All of these books are highly flawed and unreliable when it comes to Van Buren’s position on the banks and the Democratic Party. Pound’s admiration for Van Buren shows that the current right-wing love affair with Van Buren has its antecedents.
[source : Ezra Pound, American Talleyrand, From http://americantalleyrand.com/?p=246, accessed 10th February 2013]
Yesterday I hinted that maybe while in hospital something happened to Pound. Well get this. His doctor was apparently working for what would become the MK Ultra program! This devastating information comes from a Beatrice Mott who claims to have been a friend of Mullins towards the end of his life.
Here is Mott describing Pound's time in hospital.
And here is where the story goes sour. Pound was a feared political prisoner incarcerated because of what he said in Italy about America’s involvement with the international bankers and warmongering. Pound was watched twenty four hours a day and was under the supervision of Dr. Winfred Overholser, the superintendent of the hospital.
Overholser was employed by the Office of Strategic Services (the CIA’s forerunner) to test drugs for the personality-profiling program, what would be called MK-ULTRA. (See John Marks’ The Search for “the Manchurian Candidate”: The CIA and Mind-Control.) Personality profiling was St. Elizabeth’s bread and butter: The asylum was a natural ally to the agency.
Overholser was also a distinguished professor in the Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences Department of George Washington University. This department provided students as test patients for the Frankfurt Schools’ personality profiling work, which the CIA was very interested in. Prophets of Deceit, first written by Leo Löwenthal and Norbert Guterman in 1948, reads like a clumsy smear against Pound.
[source : This Difficult Individual Eustace Mullins — and the Remarkable Ezra Pound, The Occidental Observer, http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/authors/Mott-Mullins.html, 20th March 2010]
Mott also hints that perhaps Mullins' research and referencing skills could have been better, giving examples of when she asked Mullins for specific references to back up statements in the book Mullins would evade giving the reference, and would often simply reply that it is all in The Library of Congress. However, Mott also hints that maybe there was more to Mullins.
It does seem odd that a nationalist student [Mullins] would be allowed to continue the work of the dangerously brilliant Pound right under Winny’s nose. The story gets even stranger, as Mr. Mullins describes his stay in Washington during this time. He was housed at the Library of Congress — apparently he lived in one of the disused rooms in the Jefferson building and became good friends with Elizabeth Bishop.
Bishop was the Library of Congress’ “Consultant in Poetry” — quite a plum position. She was also identified by Frances Stonor Saunders as working with Nicolas Nabokov in Rio de Janeiro. Nabokov was paid by the CIA to handle South American-focused anti-Stalinist writers. (See The Cultural Cold War: The CIA and the World of Arts and Letters.) If what Saunders says is true, then it puts Eustace in strange company at that time of his life.
According to the CIA’s in-house historians, the Library was also a central focus for intelligence gathering after the war, so it is doubly unlikely that just anybody would be allowed to poke around there after hours.
Whatever the motivation for letting Mullins in to see Pound was, the result has been that confusion, misinformation and unverifiable literature have clouded Pound’s message about the financial industry’s role in war. Fortunately Pound did plenty of his own writing.
Pound's war time radio rants were compiled by Leonard Doob and published as Ezra Pound Speaking. Pound is very close to the truth, except for his love of van Buren and Jackson. It would make sense for the NWO to get at Pound, incarcerate him for years in a hospital that was linked to the CIA with a doctor linked to the CIA and then allow an unknown 'writer' to befriend him to write lots of anti-Semitic books that are poorly referenced. I mean, do we have any proof that Pound paid Mullins? Any receipts? If Pound did not pay Mullins then how did Mullins finance himself while allegedly spending day after day after day reading virtually everything in The Library of Congress?
As with all disinformation, there is a lot of true fact but this is obscured by bad untrue information. The Second Bank of The United States was a good bank. It was rapidly creating a United States that threatened the British Empire. So according to the British it had to be destroyed. Van Buren and Jackson did this as agents of The British Empire. And Van Buren would not declare this in his autobiography, now would he? Van Buren would portray himself and his allies as heroes. Such a bank as The Second Bank of The United States must be made to appear bad so that nobody would ever dare suggest creating such a bank again. Hence Secrets of The Federal Reserve? Because that is the source that is cited by many as providing the definitive history of banking in the USA. Documentaries have been based on the work of Mullins. Books too. However, Mullins stated that Henry Clews stated several facts about The Bank of England and the Rothschilds. But when you read Clews' book Clews does not make those statements. If anything Clews blames Jackson for screwing up the economy!
This is making much more sense of Eustace Mullins and Ezra Pound and the little unsourced factoids in Mullins' books. The one little unsourced factoid that I have as yet been unable to source has been the claim that Biddle was an agent of the Rothschilds. I am prepared to believe that for whatever reason Mullins made that one up!
For who would challenge an author, the oracle, who allegedly spent years reading nearly everything in The Library of Congress?
Saturday, February 09, 2013
OPEN YOUR MIND
This is an appeal to everyone, but particularly to those who still believe in Saint Andrew Jackson.
Read the publications of Anton Chaitkin and Michale Kirsch from 2006 onwards on this. I know that this contradicts Eustace Mullins and therefore everything that he wrote. I am becoming more and more suspicious of Mullins and particularly Pound. They kept Pound isolated in a tiny cell for weeks, and that is the minimum of what we know what they did. What else did they to him all that time he was isolated? And that he couldn't remember?
But I need to be absolutely 100% sure of history before I stand up in a court of law and refer to and call witnesses on the history of privately-owned banking.
U.S.U.R.A. - Open Your Mind (Classic Mix)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sEgiNag27WI&feature=related
Read the publications of Anton Chaitkin and Michale Kirsch from 2006 onwards on this. I know that this contradicts Eustace Mullins and therefore everything that he wrote. I am becoming more and more suspicious of Mullins and particularly Pound. They kept Pound isolated in a tiny cell for weeks, and that is the minimum of what we know what they did. What else did they to him all that time he was isolated? And that he couldn't remember?
But I need to be absolutely 100% sure of history before I stand up in a court of law and refer to and call witnesses on the history of privately-owned banking.
U.S.U.R.A. - Open Your Mind (Classic Mix)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sEgiNag27WI&feature=related
THE CITIZEN'S ARREST
Is this an arcane idea from ancient antiquity? Perhaps a myth? A legend? A hope?
NO!
According toGod Wikipedia the Citizen's Arrest is still operational and legal.
So if you have reasonable grounds for the arrest of a paedophile then you are perfectly within the law to arrest that person and drag him or her to the nearest police station where he or she will hopefully be detained, charged, prosecuted and given a custodial sentence for a very, very, very long time (and a strand of their DNA taken for analysis to see if this detestable behaviour really does 'run in the family' so to speak).
NO!
According to
So if you have reasonable grounds for the arrest of a paedophile then you are perfectly within the law to arrest that person and drag him or her to the nearest police station where he or she will hopefully be detained, charged, prosecuted and given a custodial sentence for a very, very, very long time (and a strand of their DNA taken for analysis to see if this detestable behaviour really does 'run in the family' so to speak).
THINKING ABOUT YOUR LOVE
When I'm sleeping
I've got you in my dreams
Your love is creeping
Deep into my veins
...Girl I'm thinking about your love
Never knew it could be so good
Thinking of your tender touch
Never knew I could care so much
Skipworth & Turner - Thinkin' About Your Love
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OZbmriIciIc
I've got you in my dreams
Your love is creeping
Deep into my veins
...Girl I'm thinking about your love
Never knew it could be so good
Thinking of your tender touch
Never knew I could care so much
Skipworth & Turner - Thinkin' About Your Love
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OZbmriIciIc
ONE SMALL STEP FOR CYPRUS. ONE GIANT LEAP FOR PALESTINE.
It is being reported that little Cyprus has stood up to the bullying murdering Zionist entity and has allowed the creation of an embassy for Palestine, giving the embassy full diplomatic status. This is yet another breakthrough after the UN GA voted to upgrade the status of Palestine.
Step by step a State of Palestine is being created. Slowly but surely. The world has had enough.
Readers please note the list of countries who have already done this. Bulgaria is named. Burgas is in Bulgaria and was the in the news this week after Bulgaria finally relented to Israeli pressure of various forms and said that Hezbollah may have committed the bombing. I seriously doubt this. Why would Hezbollah bomb a bus in Bulgaria which has recognised the State of Palestine and also play right into the hands of the Zionist entity so that Israel and the USA could demand that the EU place sanctions on Hezbollah and take all Hezbollah's money in European accounts?
Israel was born through terror. It survives through terror.
Anyway. Bravo, little Cyprus!
Step by step a State of Palestine is being created. Slowly but surely. The world has had enough.
Readers please note the list of countries who have already done this. Bulgaria is named. Burgas is in Bulgaria and was the in the news this week after Bulgaria finally relented to Israeli pressure of various forms and said that Hezbollah may have committed the bombing. I seriously doubt this. Why would Hezbollah bomb a bus in Bulgaria which has recognised the State of Palestine and also play right into the hands of the Zionist entity so that Israel and the USA could demand that the EU place sanctions on Hezbollah and take all Hezbollah's money in European accounts?
Israel was born through terror. It survives through terror.
Anyway. Bravo, little Cyprus!
Cyprus has given the “state of Palestine” an embassy, even though it still says that a “Palestinian state” needs to be established through negotiations with Israel.
AFP reported Cyprus said on Friday it has upgraded its relations with the Palestinian Authority to full diplomatic mission status, one of just eight European Union countries to do so.
The decision was announced by the Cypriot Foreign Minister Erato Kozakou-Marcoullis during an official visit by the Palestinian Authority’s Foreign Minister Riyad al-Malki.
"I informed my Palestinian counterpart of the decision of the government to upgrade the status of the Palestinian diplomatic representation in Cyprus from that of a Diplomatic Mission to that of an Embassy of the State of Palestine,” Marcoullis told reporters, according to AFP.
She said that this "important decision" was in line with the recognition of a Palestinian state in 1988 by Cyprus, and follows seven other EU members that have recognized a Palestinian State -- Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Romania, and Slovakia.
A Cyprus Representation Office opened in Ramallah in 2009.
Malki said the decision sent a "very important message," adding, "We hope this courageous step taken by Cyprus will be taken by others in the European Union."
The PA’s ambassador to Nicosia, Walid Al-Hassan, told AFP, "Now we have diplomatic representation in Cyprus like any other country in the world. This applies to our legal situation and the immunity which accompanies diplomatic status.”
On November 29, Cyprus also voted in favor of PA Chairman Mahmoud Abbas’s bid for upgraded UN General Assembly status.
"All official correspondence will now be done in the name of the State of Palestine. Cyprus is the first European state to upgrade Palestinian status since the UN vote," Hassan told AFP.
Marcoullis said Cyprus expressed "full support" for resolving aspirations for Palestinian statehood and sovereignty and those of Israel for security, through a comprehensive negotiated peace based on a two-state solution.
Nicosia backs an enhanced EU role in efforts for renewed and substantial peace efforts in 2013.
In the months that have passed since the UN vote, Abbas has taken several steps to officially name the areas he controls "the State of Palestine".
He first ordered all of the PA's institutions to stop using the term "Palestinian National Authority" on official documents and replace it with the term 'the State of Palestine'.
Abbas then issued new guidelines ordering the PA government to re-issue passports, identity cards, registration documents, vehicle licenses, driver's licenses, stamps and postmarks.
Abbas's new guidelines dictate that a new emblem which reads "the State of Palestine" be placed on all re-issued documents.
The PA’s Minister of Communication said last month that the first stamp to carry the name “State of Palestine” will be issued for the benefit of PA diplomatic offices abroad.
(Arutz Sheva’s North American Desk is keeping you updated until the start of Shabbat in New York. The time posted automatically on all Arutz Sheva articles, however, is Israeli time.)
[source : Cyprus Gives 'Palestine' Full Diplomatic Status, INN, http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/165036#.URYXvPIXYSE, 8th February]
Friday, February 08, 2013
GOT TO GIVE IT UP
Got to give it up - Marvin Gaye
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fp7Q1OAzITM
And here is a fantastic use of this. The choreography is brilliant but could be performed just a little bit better...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fp7Q1OAzITM
And here is a fantastic use of this. The choreography is brilliant but could be performed just a little bit better...
HAVE YOU HEARD THE ONE ABOUT PRIVATELY OWNED BANKS CREATNG MONEY OUT OF THIN AIR?
It's a joke.
It's a huge joke.
One huge gigantic ginormous fucking joke...ON YOU!!
It's a huge joke.
One huge gigantic ginormous fucking joke...ON YOU!!
Wednesday, February 06, 2013
LOST IT
YOU ARE UNDER MY POWER.
IT IS THE POWER OF LOVE.
Four To The Floor - Lost It
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h-tNjjm8Npg&feature=related
IT IS THE POWER OF LOVE.
Four To The Floor - Lost It
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h-tNjjm8Npg&feature=related
BULGARIA POINTS FINGER FOR BURGAS AT HEZBOLLAH
The Burgas bombing of July 2012 in which several Israelis were killed has played directly into the hands of the Zionist entity. As such we must be highly suspicious of this.
Within hours of the bombing Israel had named the ringleader and had released a drawn image of his face, stating that he was on his way to London to bomb the Olympics. And get this. Israel also claimed that we should therefore bomb Iran!
Since then the Israeli media has jumped on the slightest mention of the bombing to blame Hezbollah. Bulgaria has so far refused to do this, but has this week finally relented and said that passports found near the bus implicate Hezbollah. And this comes after the most bizarre incident in Bulgaria in which a man with a pistol walked onto a stage at a political conference and pointed a gun at the speaker. Perhaps the two are related? Perhaps not.
But back to these passports. Bulgaria has allegedly had these passports for months and has so far refused to state that Hezbollah was involved, but only now says that those passports found near the bus implicate Hezbollah. Have we heard of something similar before? Yes we have. Shortly after 9/11 passports were 'found' in pristine condition that implicated the alleged hijackers. Similar forms of ID were 'found' in the tube tunnels of London after 7/7.
The Bilderberg Post is now citing this allegation by Bulgaria to call for Europe to take action against Hezbollah, something that Europe has so far been reluctant to do.
This WP editorial also cites the now totally discredited plot by Iran to assassinate the Saudi Ambassador to the USA inside the USA(!!) as evidence that Hezbollah and Iran are getting away with murder and must be controlled (preferably bombed to smithereens).
Meanwhile Lebanon has expressed its doubt in the allegations by saying that Bulgaria should 're-evaluate' the findings, offering to assist in the investigation in whatever way it can.
Hezbollah denies the allegation.
Have we seen attempts by Israel to blame Hezbollah for murder before? YES! The most famous is the assassination of Rafik Hariri in February 2005. The Special Tribunal for Lebanon created to investigate the assassination at first blamed Syria. The Cedar Revolution occured in Lebanon and Syria withdrew. But the charges were trumped up. So now Hezbollah is blamed. The STL said two years ago that it would release the evidence. As far as I know that evidence has not been released. But what the assassination did was satisfy the Israeli document A Clean Break, by challenging Syria and Iran in Lebanon. And what Hezbollah did was release video of interceptions from Israeli drones flying illegally over Beirut and following Hariri's car.
In fact, virtually everything that has occured since the inside job 9/11 has satisfied the warlust of the Zionist entity, which implicates Israel as the perp of 9/11. Indeed this was expressed by Francesco Cossiga in late 2007 when he said that all the intel agencies of the world know that Israel and the USA did 9/11. He should have added Saudi Arabia too. These three components of the true Axis-of-Evil have since unleashed al Qaeda and its affiliates onto Libya and now Syria, as part of a drive to inject some life into a rapidly dying plan revealed to General Wesley Clark shortly after the inside job 9/11. That plan was for war and regime change in seven nations in five years. They are woefully behind in that plan. And falling further behind by the day as the heroes of 2012 the Syrian military kick al Qaeda butt. Hence the provocation by Israel attacking a Syrian research facility shortly after Iran said that an attack on Syria is an attack on Iran.
The solution to this warmongering madness is to remove Benjamin Netanyahu, force him to resign, or impeach him (or whatever the Israeli version is). He is a madman, controlled by lunatics in London determined to unleash hell on Earth by dragging the USA into a horrible WW3 with Russia and/or China.
Within hours of the bombing Israel had named the ringleader and had released a drawn image of his face, stating that he was on his way to London to bomb the Olympics. And get this. Israel also claimed that we should therefore bomb Iran!
Since then the Israeli media has jumped on the slightest mention of the bombing to blame Hezbollah. Bulgaria has so far refused to do this, but has this week finally relented and said that passports found near the bus implicate Hezbollah. And this comes after the most bizarre incident in Bulgaria in which a man with a pistol walked onto a stage at a political conference and pointed a gun at the speaker. Perhaps the two are related? Perhaps not.
But back to these passports. Bulgaria has allegedly had these passports for months and has so far refused to state that Hezbollah was involved, but only now says that those passports found near the bus implicate Hezbollah. Have we heard of something similar before? Yes we have. Shortly after 9/11 passports were 'found' in pristine condition that implicated the alleged hijackers. Similar forms of ID were 'found' in the tube tunnels of London after 7/7.
The Bilderberg Post is now citing this allegation by Bulgaria to call for Europe to take action against Hezbollah, something that Europe has so far been reluctant to do.
The United States, which long ago designated Hezbollah as a terrorist organization, has been pressing European leaders to do the same so that the group’s funds in European banks and other financial assets can be targeted. Several governments, led by France, have resisted; they worry that sanctions could further destabilize Lebanon or subject European peacekeepers in the south of that country to reprisals. Bulgaria’s findings should end the debate. Inaction would mean accepting that Europe can be a free-fire zone for Iran and its proxies.
[source : European Union must respond to Hezbollah’s attack in Bulgaria, WP, http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/european-union-must-respond-to-hezbollahs-attack-in-bulgaria/2013/02/05/2b21ddf6-6fd1-11e2-ac36-3d8d9dcaa2e2_story.html?hpid=z3, 6th February 2013]
This WP editorial also cites the now totally discredited plot by Iran to assassinate the Saudi Ambassador to the USA inside the USA(!!) as evidence that Hezbollah and Iran are getting away with murder and must be controlled (preferably bombed to smithereens).
Meanwhile Lebanon has expressed its doubt in the allegations by saying that Bulgaria should 're-evaluate' the findings, offering to assist in the investigation in whatever way it can.
Lebanese Prime Minister Najib Mikati has called on the Bulgarian government to re-evaluate the results of a probe which accuses the Hezbollah resistance movement of involvement in a bomb attack on a bus carrying Israeli tourists in Bulgaria last year.
"Lebanon trusts that the Bulgarian authorities will undertake a serious evaluation of the results of the investigation and affirms that it is ready to cooperate with Bulgaria to shed light on the circumstances" of the bombing in the eastern city of Burgas, AFP quoted Mikati as saying in on Tuesday.
[source : Lebanon to Bulgaria: re-evaluate results of bus bombing probe, Press TV, http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2013/02/06/287487/lebanon-asks-bulgaria-to-review-bomb-probe/, 6th February 2013]
Hezbollah denies the allegation.
Have we seen attempts by Israel to blame Hezbollah for murder before? YES! The most famous is the assassination of Rafik Hariri in February 2005. The Special Tribunal for Lebanon created to investigate the assassination at first blamed Syria. The Cedar Revolution occured in Lebanon and Syria withdrew. But the charges were trumped up. So now Hezbollah is blamed. The STL said two years ago that it would release the evidence. As far as I know that evidence has not been released. But what the assassination did was satisfy the Israeli document A Clean Break, by challenging Syria and Iran in Lebanon. And what Hezbollah did was release video of interceptions from Israeli drones flying illegally over Beirut and following Hariri's car.
In fact, virtually everything that has occured since the inside job 9/11 has satisfied the warlust of the Zionist entity, which implicates Israel as the perp of 9/11. Indeed this was expressed by Francesco Cossiga in late 2007 when he said that all the intel agencies of the world know that Israel and the USA did 9/11. He should have added Saudi Arabia too. These three components of the true Axis-of-Evil have since unleashed al Qaeda and its affiliates onto Libya and now Syria, as part of a drive to inject some life into a rapidly dying plan revealed to General Wesley Clark shortly after the inside job 9/11. That plan was for war and regime change in seven nations in five years. They are woefully behind in that plan. And falling further behind by the day as the heroes of 2012 the Syrian military kick al Qaeda butt. Hence the provocation by Israel attacking a Syrian research facility shortly after Iran said that an attack on Syria is an attack on Iran.
The solution to this warmongering madness is to remove Benjamin Netanyahu, force him to resign, or impeach him (or whatever the Israeli version is). He is a madman, controlled by lunatics in London determined to unleash hell on Earth by dragging the USA into a horrible WW3 with Russia and/or China.
Monday, February 04, 2013
WE NEED A REVOLUTION IN BANKING NOT ELECTRIFIED RINGFENCING
Ringfencing and 'electrification' is not Glass-Steagall.
The bankers will soon get around the current laws with their financial shenanigans.
The bankers are wrecking the world.
We don't need them. They need us and our gullibility.
We need a revolution in banking.
NO TO PRIVATELY OWNED BANKS IN THE UK GAMBLING AND CREATING MONEY OUT OF THIN AIR.
YES TO A STATE OWNED BANK CREATING CREDIT FOR THE NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE AND MUTUALLY BENEFICIAL INTERNATIONAL PROGRAMS.
The bankers will soon get around the current laws with their financial shenanigans.
The bankers are wrecking the world.
We don't need them. They need us and our gullibility.
We need a revolution in banking.
NO TO PRIVATELY OWNED BANKS IN THE UK GAMBLING AND CREATING MONEY OUT OF THIN AIR.
YES TO A STATE OWNED BANK CREATING CREDIT FOR THE NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE AND MUTUALLY BENEFICIAL INTERNATIONAL PROGRAMS.
Sunday, February 03, 2013
WE NEED AND CAN HAVE A BANK LIKE THE SECOND BANK OF THE UNITED STATES
The more I read the more I believe we need and can have a bank exactly like the Second Bank of The United States (BUS2) that was destroyed by the traitor President Andrew Jackson. The bank should operate exactly like BUS2, with publicly elected officials for a fixed term, with banks similar to US state banks in Northern Ireland, Scotland, Wales and England, perhaps even sub-banks in counties and/or cities and/or regions who would have more detailed local knowledge, but one central bank to regulate and control the pound (or whatever the currency is called) with tariffs on imports, sound control of specie, and financing of national and perhaps international programs that would be mutually beneficial. The bank should finance national public works that would help to generate wealth and allow small and family business to grow and flourish. We can be nearly 100% self reliant. We have an abundance of fresh water and superb farm land. We have the best coal in the world and 200 years of it. Our education system and transport infrastructure need improving. And we definitely need to overhaul the Nazi NHS that is now killing both old and young alike. But with the proper credit system we could advance these rapidly. For now that bank could be called The Bank of The United Kingdom, but once the monarchy has been abolished this could change to The Bank of the Republic of Britain.
We, the muggins British taxpayer, have put up with this current corrupt and self-serving banking system for far too long. This system has given too much undeserved power to a criminal cabal who have engineered world wars and genocide and intend reducing human population down to around one billion, and whether it was planned 150 years ago (as Albert Pike planned and I believe he, or someone else, did) or it has been engineered only recently, the situation in the Middle East is looking more and more like the trigger for WW3 that I thought it would be after the inside job 9/11.
However, there is one aspect of BUS2 that I am suspicious of, and that is that the BUS2 was a privately owned central bank. Yes, it was used differently than say The Bank of England has been. But the US government held only 20% of the stock of BUS2. 20%! The names associated with BUS2 were Girard and Astor who had questionable allegiances. Perhaps these were needed for their specie. This may need to be addressed with this new bank, with private stockholders (but vetted) at first, but whose stock could be bought after. I would prefer the new bank to be initially 100% owned by the people in the form of a republican government owning 100% of the stock, but realise this may take time to achieve and that perhaps stock could be bought by other well intentioned investors, but only initially.
This is my suggestion as to how to save this Disunited Fascist Kingdom. We can be united against the EU, neither fascist nor communist just free, and make a peaceful transition from a Kingdom to a Republic.
But we want, need and can have a fairer banking system, one that serves the people not a kleptocracy. There was definitely a plot by Great Britain to destroy the Second Bank of The United States and there has definitely been a subsequent plot to cover that plot up by portraying Andrew Jackson as a hero battling the Rothschilds. But if he hated the Rothschilds so much why did he make them bankers to the US?! Even Mullins states this happened but did not question why Jackson would do this.
And when you read what the BUS2 did and how it worked you will understand why. Within just a few years it had enabled the USA to become a huge threat to the British empire. And its operation was not that complex. But it helped the ordinary man in the street who just wanted to get on and contribute to create wealth for himself, his family and his new young nation.
We can be a Great Britain again, but without the slave-trading, warmongering, kiddie-fiddling, fascist kleptocracy that has ruled us since the 16th Century.
We, the muggins British taxpayer, have put up with this current corrupt and self-serving banking system for far too long. This system has given too much undeserved power to a criminal cabal who have engineered world wars and genocide and intend reducing human population down to around one billion, and whether it was planned 150 years ago (as Albert Pike planned and I believe he, or someone else, did) or it has been engineered only recently, the situation in the Middle East is looking more and more like the trigger for WW3 that I thought it would be after the inside job 9/11.
However, there is one aspect of BUS2 that I am suspicious of, and that is that the BUS2 was a privately owned central bank. Yes, it was used differently than say The Bank of England has been. But the US government held only 20% of the stock of BUS2. 20%! The names associated with BUS2 were Girard and Astor who had questionable allegiances. Perhaps these were needed for their specie. This may need to be addressed with this new bank, with private stockholders (but vetted) at first, but whose stock could be bought after. I would prefer the new bank to be initially 100% owned by the people in the form of a republican government owning 100% of the stock, but realise this may take time to achieve and that perhaps stock could be bought by other well intentioned investors, but only initially.
This is my suggestion as to how to save this Disunited Fascist Kingdom. We can be united against the EU, neither fascist nor communist just free, and make a peaceful transition from a Kingdom to a Republic.
But we want, need and can have a fairer banking system, one that serves the people not a kleptocracy. There was definitely a plot by Great Britain to destroy the Second Bank of The United States and there has definitely been a subsequent plot to cover that plot up by portraying Andrew Jackson as a hero battling the Rothschilds. But if he hated the Rothschilds so much why did he make them bankers to the US?! Even Mullins states this happened but did not question why Jackson would do this.
And when you read what the BUS2 did and how it worked you will understand why. Within just a few years it had enabled the USA to become a huge threat to the British empire. And its operation was not that complex. But it helped the ordinary man in the street who just wanted to get on and contribute to create wealth for himself, his family and his new young nation.
We can be a Great Britain again, but without the slave-trading, warmongering, kiddie-fiddling, fascist kleptocracy that has ruled us since the 16th Century.
IS THIS LOVE?
Whitesnake - Is This Love?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=loM99T_XEyk
I should have known better
Than to let you go alone,
It's times like these
I can't make it on my own
Wasted days, and sleepless nights
And I can't wait to see you again
I find I spend my time
Waiting on your call,
How can I tell you, baby
My back's against the wall
I need you by my side
To tell me it's alright,
'Cos I don't think I can take anymore
Is this love that I'm feeling,
Is this the love, that I've been searching for
Is this love or am I dreaming,
This must be love,
'Cos it's really got a hold on me,
A hold on me...
I can't stop the feeling
I've been this way before
But, with you I've found the key
To open any door
I can feel my love for you
Growing stronger day by day,
An' I can't wait to see you again
So I can hold you in my arms
Is this love that I'm feeling,
Is this the love, that I've been searching for
Is this love or am I dreaming,
This must be love,
'Cos it's really got a hold on me,
A hold on me...
Is this love that I'm feeling,
Is this the love, that I've been searching for...
Is this love or am I dreaming,
Is this the love, that I've been searching for...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=loM99T_XEyk
I should have known better
Than to let you go alone,
It's times like these
I can't make it on my own
Wasted days, and sleepless nights
And I can't wait to see you again
I find I spend my time
Waiting on your call,
How can I tell you, baby
My back's against the wall
I need you by my side
To tell me it's alright,
'Cos I don't think I can take anymore
Is this love that I'm feeling,
Is this the love, that I've been searching for
Is this love or am I dreaming,
This must be love,
'Cos it's really got a hold on me,
A hold on me...
I can't stop the feeling
I've been this way before
But, with you I've found the key
To open any door
I can feel my love for you
Growing stronger day by day,
An' I can't wait to see you again
So I can hold you in my arms
Is this love that I'm feeling,
Is this the love, that I've been searching for
Is this love or am I dreaming,
This must be love,
'Cos it's really got a hold on me,
A hold on me...
Is this love that I'm feeling,
Is this the love, that I've been searching for...
Is this love or am I dreaming,
Is this the love, that I've been searching for...
Friday, February 01, 2013
BUT WILLIAM THE ROOT CAUSE IS YOU
In response to the blatantly illegal bombing of a Syrian research facility by Israel, Foreign Minister William Hague has refused to condemn the action.
But William the root cause is you!
You, NATO, Israel, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and Turkey.
You are using extremist Jihadis to attack a sovereign nation state that is an enemy of the Zionist entity...AND YOU ARE LOSING!
The heroes of 2012, the Syrian military, are repelling the Jihadis. Every day it it reported that that 10 or 20 or 30 or more Jihadis are now dead Jihadis. Every day it is reported that the Syrian people hate the NATO proxy terrorist scum. Every day it is reported that the Jihadis are on the run. Every day it is reported that the NATO proxy terrorist scum are destroying peaceful towns and villages, looting and massacring.
The Syrian people are rallying around their President.
The world is awake to your criminal cabal.
Shut up and get our boys out of Syria...NOW!
UK Foreign Secretary William Hague said that rather than condemning the actions of Israel, attention should be focussed on addressing ''the root causes'' of the crisis in Syria.
[source : William Hague: I'm not condemning Israel over 'attack' on Syria, BBC, http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-21285348, 31st January 2013]
But William the root cause is you!
You, NATO, Israel, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and Turkey.
You are using extremist Jihadis to attack a sovereign nation state that is an enemy of the Zionist entity...AND YOU ARE LOSING!
The heroes of 2012, the Syrian military, are repelling the Jihadis. Every day it it reported that that 10 or 20 or 30 or more Jihadis are now dead Jihadis. Every day it is reported that the Syrian people hate the NATO proxy terrorist scum. Every day it is reported that the Jihadis are on the run. Every day it is reported that the NATO proxy terrorist scum are destroying peaceful towns and villages, looting and massacring.
The Syrian people are rallying around their President.
The world is awake to your criminal cabal.
Shut up and get our boys out of Syria...NOW!