WHEREFORE BY THEIR SILENCE YE SHALL KNOW THEM

One day early last year, during a lecture, I sat next to someone who I had known for a few months. She had helped me out when my car wouldn't start. While we waited for a mechanic to arrive we got talking and briefly got to know and suss each other out a bit. During the aforementioned lecture we started talking and I told her for the first time that I had a deep interest in modern history and current affairs, hoping that she would be interested, but I was not asked anything further on this. In subsequent emails I repeated that I had a deep interest in modern history and current affairs, and provided a small part of what I knew, hoping to spark her interest and provoke a response. But again, no questions were asked on this. So I did not divulge every little fact and theory I knew because I thought it would be too much, because I was not being asked any questions, despite providing some information that I thought was thought-provoking.

So from this I guessed that other people were not ready. And if they were not ready at that time then they were not ready earlier. What I had was over 20 years of research and experience that gave me a totally different view of the world. It takes that amount of time in order to be able to predict when a false flag attack is about to occur in Syria, why it will happen, and also name the culprit. Those who wanted to know would have been asking questions, like I had been asking for over 20 years, so I had placed what I knew on the internet for others, who were asking questions, to find.

People seem quite happy with the world, despite all the poverty and hunger and war. People have brains to see what's going on around them but they seem to shrug their shoulders and accept it. Some love football and nothing else. Some love music and nothing else. Others have their own interests and/or pleasures too. But then some, like me, love to know how the world really works, why it's so fucking shit, and not be taken for mugs and treated like shit, spending nearly every free minute that they have gathering and analysing information. Before lectures, during breaks, during lunch; reading, reading, reading.

But then something happened. I haven't a clue why, but for some unexplained reason she stopped communicating. However, this occured just as I started to talk about Bohemian Grove and the architecture of Washington DC, in particular Moloch.

I've asked several times why, and as yet have received no answer. There may be a completely innocent reason. But it does seem a bit of a coincidence...

And this is not the first time that this has happened, so maybe there is something in common.

I guess the time was not quite right then for the information to be heard and accepted as truth, but, as it has been suggested, it might be now, particularly after even The Marsten House felt the force and voted against war on Syria.

And if she ever reads this then I would still like to know why? I've asked several times.

THIS BLOG IS IN PRAISE OF...

For several months The warmongering ZioGuardian has been running a version of an editorial entitled In Praise Of... in which something is praised by The Guardian editorial board. Recent things praised have been the three-toed sloth, dingoes and the DIY dinner service.

Today The warmongering ZioGuardian is in praise of Brown Moses.

Moses has no qualifications in weapons whatsoever yet he has for some reason become a NATO media darling in Weapons of Mass Destruction, particularly in Syria.

Why?

Because he is trying to pin the horrific events in Ghouta of 21st August last year on President Bashar al Assad and the Syrian Arab Army.

Here is what The Guardian says in praise of Brown Moses:

"Wisdom reekin' outa me ..." sings Frank Zappa in his song Brown Moses. That may be why Eliot Higgins chose the name for his blog where he charts the unreported news from parts of Syria where conflict is so brutal no journalist or aid worker would sensibly visit. With a background in finance and administration and speaking no Arabic, Mr Higgins was already monitoring YouTube and Twitter for videos and stills of the internal war before he was made redundant last October. Now, backed by a crowdsourced fund, he works full time from his home in Nottingham analysing images. He has taught himself how chemical weapons are made, how to use Google Earth so that he can pinpoint the exact place footage was filmed, and how to identify shells and find out where they come from. His work, including a project with the New York Times on arms smuggling, is widely respected. He's pushed back the frontier of citizen journalism.

[source : In praise of … Brown Moses, The Guardian, http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/apr/16/in-praise-of-brown-moses-blog-syria-higgins, 16th April 2014]

At the moment Brown Moses is trying to destroy Seymour Hersh via Hersh's knowledge of Volcano rockets. Moses also tried to destroy the Mint Press article, which blamed Ghouta on rebels who had been given chemicals by al Nusra Front who had in turn been given the chemicals by Prince Bandar bin Sultan of Saudi Arabia.

Needless to say, Brown Moses has failed in these endeavours.

However, there have been some developments on the latest Seymour Hersh article, specifically that Hersh reported that Porton Down had said the chemicals used at Ghouta were not from Syria's arsenal. According to The Times foreign correspondent Tom Coghlan

MoD's Defence Science and Technology Laboratory spokesman said absolute confidence that the sarin analysed was from Syrian regime stocks

— Tom Coghlan (@TomCoghlan) April 8, 2014

However, a Google search indicates that Coghlan does not appear to have published this claim in The Times. And we have to ask why not. Is it because to do so would bring attention to Seymour Hersh and his reports? Or because to do so would require some kind of legal confirmation and/or backing?

I also expressed some doubts about the latest Hersh article, which I believe pointed the finger at Turkey much more than they deserve. Ghouta was levels above anything that Turkey had done previously, but Saudi Arabia had recent form in doing something like Ghouta; it ran 9/11, which is why 28 pages of the official report into 9/11 were redacted!!!

Moses has apparently hooked up with a London-based WMD consultant called Dan Kaszeta, who worked for the US military and Secret Service (so no possibility that he might be CIA or other alphabet agency). Kaszeta is that good that his first professional opinion was that Sarin was not used at Ghouta, but over time that opinion has changed. One needs to ask who Kaszeta's clients have been, are and could be in the future...

However, their analyses completely omit the global geopolitics of events in Syria.

They trust the United Nations.

They trust NATO.

They trust Saudi Arabia.

They appear willingly oblivious to the violence in Syria being part of a long term plan for war on seven nations in five years as revealed to General Wesley Clark, which was instigated by the inside job 9/11 and amended in 2007 to allow Saudi Arabia to unleash cutthroat Jihadis onto Syria...AS SEYMOUR HERSH PREDICTED WOULD HAPPEN YEARS BEFORE IT HAPPENED!!

They also appear oblivious to the FACT that Prince Bandar bin Sultan was dispatched to Moscow to threaten Putin with unleashing hell in Syria if Putin didn't dump Assad. A few weeks after this threat was issued and rejected by Putin there was Ghouta.

I saw massive significance in this visit and asked that you all write to your MP to warn him/her of the coming carnage in Syria. The Saudi-backed rebels were suffering defeat after defeat and needed a spectacular event to provoke a large scale military intervention by NATO on their behalf, as happened in Libya.

Initial estimates of the dead approached 2000.

Within days this was revised down to a few hundred.

But videos surfaced showing men dead but then later alive.

And Mother Agnes Mariam claimed that children kidnapped from Lattakia had been identified by their parents in videos claiming to show the aftermath of Ghouta. She was very unprofessionally harassed off the Stop The War conference by Jeremy Scahill, who later teamed up with Glenn Greenwald in a new media venture.

And still 8 months after it happened the intercepted communications we were told existed which proved that the Syrian Arab Army did it have not been released. The major conduit of this allegation was the Israeli intelligence-run Debkafile. Israel is one of, if not THE, main beneficiaries of all the wars since 9/11, which occured on a day when Zionist agents had control of the US military when it went conveniently AWOL for the Zionist warmongers eager to implement their plans as proposed in A Clean Break and Rebuilding America's Defenses.

One citizen blogger organisation who I think are demolishing Brown Moses is Who Attacked Ghouta?

So far I believe:
1. the evidence that Assad did it is flimsy at best, and is being gradually destroyed and losing credibility;
2. that Assad would kill thousands of his own people when this was precisely what NATO and Saudi Arabia and their cutthroat rebels wanted, and risk turning not only the Syrian Arab Army but also the Syrian people against him, defies all logic. I ask, why have the Syrian people and/or the SAA not rushed to oust him after Ghouta? They have had 8 months to find out themselves through their own private internal inquiries.;
3. the rebels had been developing chemical weapons, had tested them on animals and had issued threats on video of using chemical weapons;
4. that Bandar's threat issued to Putin resulted in Ghouta, and despite the vain efforts of Brown Moses to destroy the Mint Press article, all fingers point at Prince Bandar being involved in some ways, though not pulling the trigger.

And that The Guardian cried with joy when Assad agreed to relinquish his chemical weapons without once mentioning Israel's more powerful, terrifying and destructive arsenal of WMDs, and also not bring attention to the aforementioned plan revealed to General Wesley Clark, betrays their allegiance: NATO.

So this blog is in praise of...Who Attacked Ghouta?

THE CHURCH OF WAR

There is a new religion.

It is called war.

Disciples of war usually work in offices of government or banks.

Rarely do they visit the front lines, and even more rare are the occasions when they have actually fired a gun and/or experienced the consequences.

Disciples of war love to pose and beat their chests and send others to fight and die by lying through their teeth.

The High Priests of War have children, which is evidence enough that making love does not make love.

The cathedral of war is The Marsten House.

DOES THE BRITISH GOVERNMENT WANT OBAMA TO RELEASE THE REDACTED 28 PAGES ON 9/11?

Further to the video of the press conference on the redacted 28 pages I posted earlier, the main sponsors of the bill demanding that those 28 pages be released in full, Walter Jones and Stephen Lynch, sent a letter to President Obama on 10th April setting out their case and the support they have from the families of the 9/11 victims.

But what does the British Government think?

Should Obama declassify the 28 pages?

Let's find out.

PETITION FOR ALASKA TO REJOIN RUSSIA

Less than a month and over 42000 signatures already!

https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/alaska-back-russia/SFG1ppfN

MORE UKRAINE MILITARY IGNORE NEO NAZI PUTSCHIST ORDERS TO SUPPRESS SLAVYANSK

The Ukraine military is crumbling. As soon as they confront the Ukrainian people they realise that the people are not 'terrorists', as the neo Nazi NATO-sponsored putschists describe them, but ordinary people just like them with legitimate concerns.

But in reserve is the brownshirt National Guard which is made up of hardcore neo-Nazi Maidan thugs who can't wait to steam in and crush some pro-Russian heads.

Reports from Slavyansk say that the army troops sent to the eastern Ukrainian city for an “anti-terrorist operation” are leaving en masse. Some troops are openly voicing support for the eastern Ukrainians, while others are speaking out against a war.

According to Interfax, citing local self-defense activists, some 300 Ukrainian troops agreed to lay down their weapons and “go home” following negotiations in Slavyansk.

[source : Dozens of Ukrainian troops surrender APCs, withdraw from Slavyansk, RT, http://rt.com/news/ukraine-troops-withdraw-slavyansk-940/?utm_medium=twitter&utm_source=twitterfeed, 16th April 2014]

ASK NOT WHAT CAN HUMANITY DO FOR YOU ASK WHAT YOU CAN DO FOR HUMANITY

28 pages of the inquiry into 9/11 were redacted. They remain redacted to this day.

WHY?!

Because they will reveal who sponsored 9/11.

We know it was Saudi Arabia, but we still need those 28 pages as slam dunk evidence.

9/11 is the event of the 21st Century.

Without it there would have been no invasion of Afghanistan and the subsequent record production of opium for heroin, no invasion of Iraq, no war on Lebanon, no 7/7, no war on Libya, and no invasion by cutthroat Jihadis of Syria.

For the sake of humanity I ask President Obama to release those 28 pages in full.

In failing to release those 28 pages President Obama is complicit in the crime of the century.

WICKED WICKED BANDAR HAS OFFICIALLY BEEN REPLACED

This news has been coming for months. It was first reported in January.

(Reuters) - Saudi Arabian intelligence chief Prince Bandar bin Sultan, the architect of Riyadh's attempts to bring down Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, has been removed from his post, state media reported on Tuesday.

..."Prince Bandar was relieved of his post at his own request and General Youssef al-Idrissi was asked to carry out the duties of the head of general intelligence," state news agency SPA said, citing a royal decree.

[source : Saudi spy chief, architect of Syria policy, replaced, Reuters, http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/04/15/us-saudi-intelligence-idUSBREA3E1HT20140415, 15th April 2014]

WE ARE ALL BOYS WHO WON'T SHOOT OUR OWN PEOPLE

The Ukrainian Defence Minister is denying that a unit of the Ukrainian military has defected from the neo-Nazi NATO-sponsored putschists to support the people of Ukraine.

He is beginning to look and sound like Comical Ali, who in 2003 was filmed saying that Baghdad would never fall into the hands of the Coalition of the Willing as American tanks drove past behind him.

With the rise of social media there are gerzillions of photographs and film of the tank and APCs bearing Russian flags.

And here is what one member of the defecting unit has told a Reuters reporter:

A soldier manning one of the troop carriers now under the control of pro-Russian separatists identified himself to Reuters as being a member of Ukraine's 25th paratrooper division from Dnipropetrovsk.

He said: "All the soldiers and the officers are here. We are all boys who won't shoot our own people."

FACEBOOK JIHADI PREACHERS FUELLING JIHAD AGAINST SYRIA

This report adds to the FACT that MI5 were and still are allowing radical Muslim preachers to incite violence in Syria in a Covenant of Security because it is current British foreign policy. Michael Adebalajo was allowed to preach Jihad against President Bashar al Assad by MI5 before he butchered Lee Rigby.

The Guardian is reporting on a study made by two researchers from King's College London into

how social media is being harnessed by a network of radical preachers to inspire and guide British and other western Muslims waging jihad in Syria.

...The information allowed the analysts to identify a "set of new spiritual authorities" who have the largest followings. The report says they are the American-based cleric Ahmad Musa Jibril and the Australian preacher Musa Cerantonio. Both speak English and are based in the west.

Although there is no evidence to suggest these individuals are physically involved in facilitating the flow of foreign fighters to Syria, or that they are co-ordinating their activity with jihadist organisations, they are playing the role of cheerleaders. "It is clear that they are important figures whose political, moral and spiritual messages are considered attractive to a number of foreign fighters," the researchers conclude.

"Syria may be the first conflict in which a large number of western fighters have been documenting their involvement in conflict in real-time, and where – in turn – social media represents an essential source of information and inspiration to them," the report, a product of a year-long study, concludes.

...The study says Jibril is now the most "liked" personality on Facebook among the foreign fighters they tracked and is followed by 60% of foreign jihadists in Syria on Twitter.

[source : Revealed: the radical clerics using social media to back British jihadists in Syria, The Guardian, http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/apr/15/preachers-spiritual-cheerleaders-social-media-syria-london-university, 16th April 2014]

So just how can these people, preachers in the UK, USA and Australia and Jihadis in Syria, operate like this, on the internet, where everything is watched so intensely?

Because they are allowed to.

Because it is current British and American foreign policy to fuel the Jihad against Syria.

Why don't they shut down Jibril's accounts immediately?

UKRAINE USES GUNSHIPS TO PUT DOWN REBELLION. HAVEN'T WE HEARD THAT SOMEWHERE BEFORE?

It is being reported that the neo-Nazi NATO-sponsored unelected putschists have used helicopter gunships to put down the rebellion of pro-Russia Ukrainians in Kramatorsk.

A prolonged and increasingly vicious confrontation in eastern Ukraine turned into armed conflict today as Ukrainian troops used helicopter gunships to seize back an airport that had been held by pro-Russian militiamen.

The attack at Kramatorsk came as ground forces with armour gathered around Slovyansk, which had become a symbolic stronghold for well-armed separatists.

At Kramatorsk, two of the aircraft carried out strafing runs, before two others landed troops. Four people were believed to have been injured, but claims of people killed, some of them civilians, could not be verified.

[source : Ukraine crisis: Helicopter gunships take country closer to all-out war, The Independent, http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/ukraine-crisis-obama-calls-on-putin-to-rein-in-armed-prorussian-separatists-9261011.html, 15th April 2014]

But haven't we heard this before?

And when we did was it not said to be a very bad thing?

Yes, we have heard this before.

In Syria.

And it was said to be very, very bad, that bad that for years there have been several attempts to implement a No Fly Zone over Syria.

But there are several crucial differences between Ukraine and Syria:
1. the protestors in East Ukraine are genuinely from East Ukraine, while the protestors in Syria are from virtually every corner of the universe;
2. the protestors in East Ukraine have genuine concerns and grievances after watching an anti-Russia NATO-sponsored violent neo-Nazi coup in Kiev, while the protestors in Syria have been smuggled into Syria by the likes of Great Britain to grind down the indefatigable Syrian people though horrific terror.

It will be interesting to see and hear how NATO politicians contrast this use of helicopter gunships in Ukraine to that in Syria.

WHAT ARE YOU DOING AND WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO NOW?

Now that you know all this?

After everything that your fathers, grandfathers, great grandfathers went through in WW1 and WW2?

Did they fight and die for all this bullshit and fascism and lying and cheating and stealing and murdering?

Their blood is running through your veins.

Was it all so that you would enjoy and look forward to being mugged off every day?

Was it all for nought?

To watch The Only Way Is Essex?

To ostracise?

To shop?

To shrug your shoulders?

Or like little kings and queens expect others to get you out of this mess?

THE VIEW FROM ILKLEY MOOR IS SPOILED BY THIS CESSPIT

There is a fantastic view of the Yorkshire Dales from Ilkley Moor.

But then there is this eye sore; The Golf Balls of Menwith Hill.

A monstrosity.

An unnecessary cesspit of unnecessary spies.


I wouldn't be surprised if they were watching me having a number three yesterday.

IN THE CROWD

The Jam - In The Crowd (Live)


When I'm in the crowd, I don't see anything
My mind goes a blank, in the humid sunshine
when I'm in the crowd I don't see anything.

I fall into a trance, at the supermarket
the noise flows me along, as I catch falling cans
of baked beans on toast, technology is the most.

and everyone seems just like me,
they struggle hard to set themselves free
and their waiting for the change.

When I'm in the crowd, I can't remember my name
and my only link is a pots of Wall's ice cream
when I'm in the crowd - I don't see anything

Sometimes I think that it's a plot,
an equilibrium melting pot
The government sponsors underhand.

When I'm in the crowd
When I'm in the crowd
When I'm in the crowd

And everyone seems that they're acting a dream
'cause they're just not thinking about each other
and they're taking orders, which are media spawned
and they should know better, now you have been warned

and don't forget you saw it here first.

in the crowd, I don't see a thing
My mind goes a blank, in the humid sunshine
when I'm in the crowd I don't see anything.

And life just simply moves along
in simple houses, simple jobs
and no ones wanting for the change

When I'm in the crowd
When I'm in the crowd
When I'm in the crowd

Writer: WELLER, PAUL JOHN
Lyrics © Universal Music Publishing Group

I'M NOT CONFUSED. IT'S BRAZEN HYPOCRISY.

Fantastic take on the brazen hypocrisy of NATO politicians on just about everything.

I'm confused. A few weeks ago we were told in the West that people occupying government buildings in Ukraine was a very good thing. These people, we were told by our political leaders and elite media commentators, were 'pro-democracy protestors'.

The US government warned the Ukrainian authorities against using force against these 'pro-democracy protestors' even if, according to the pictures we saw, some of them were neo-Nazis who were throwing Molotov cocktails and other things at the police and smashing up statues and setting fire to buildings.

Now, just a few weeks later, we're told that people occupying government buildings in Ukraine are not 'pro-democracy protestors' but 'terrorists' or 'militants'.

Why was the occupation of government buildings in Ukraine a very good thing in January, but it is a very bad thing in April? Why was the use of force by the authorities against protestors completely unacceptable in January, but acceptable now? I repeat: I'm confused. Can anyone help me?

[source : Neil Clark, I'm confused, can anyone help me?, RT, http://rt.com/op-edge/west-leaders-ukraine-democracy-600/, 15th April 2014]

Since publication the neo-Nazi NATO-sponsored unelected putschists have begun to violently and tragically attack the pro-Russia protesters demanding a referendum to join Russia.

A MOCKERY OF JOURNALISM

The Guardian and The Washington Post have been awarded The Pulitzer Prize for Public Service for their work with and on Ed Snowden and his 'revelations' of mass surveillance by the NSA and GCHQ.

This is a mockery of journalism.

The Pulitzer Board should hang their heads in shame.

And here is why.

First, we knew about Echelon in 1999. We knew/suspected that surveillance would have evolved with, if not dictated, social media. Elements of US and British law contain paragraphs which virtually state that we are being spied on and we can't do anything about it, and that all our 'liberating' technology, such as smartphones and system software, were designed with backdoors for the spies to listen in and control.

But the second reason is much more nefarious.

On September 11th 2001 four passenger planes were allegedly hijacked and flew unimpeded for nearly 2 hours before flying into the WTC and even the HQ of the alleged most powerful military in the world, The Pentagon!

Shortly after that murdered September day, the former Commander of NATO Forces in Europe General Wesley Clark was told of a plan for war on seven nations in five years. Clark is on Youtube revealing this plan.

Here he is.


And here he is again, in a different interview/speech.


Clark also described this plan in his book Winning Modern Wars.

We invaded Afghanistan because we were told that Osama bin Laden was the culprit behind 9/11. We were told that an extensive dossier proving his guilt was being compiled. But it was never released. The FBI page on bin Laden did not explicitly list 9/11 as a crime of which bin Laden was accused. Bin Laden was allegedly hiding out in Afghanistan, so we went into Afghanistan to bring peace and democracy and prosperity. Instead we restored opium production to record levels, while the Taliban have become more of a threat. Our ruling families have been running the opium trade for centuries. Bin Laden died from Marfan Syndrome years ago.

So with opium production restored, it was on with the plan revealed to General Wesley Clark.

Iraq in 2003.
Lebanon in 2006.

But by 2007 the plan was moribund so Plan B was implemented which involved unleashing cutthroat Jihadis sponsored by Saudi Arabia onto some of the nations named to Clark. But to provide them with cover as 'freedom fighters' The Arab Spring was engineered by American NGOs and the CIA.

The Jihadis were first unleashed onto Libya in 2011.

And since 2011 the Jihadis have been in Syria, butchering their way in a vain and futile attempt to crush the indefatigable spirit of the Syrian people and their Syrian Arab Army.

The major nation supporting Syria against this illegal aggression and invasion is Russia. Last summer Prince Bandar went to Russia and made a lovely, heartwarming threat to Putin: dump Assad and Saudi Arabia would buy multi billions of dollars of Russian weapons and allow Russia to operate in the Middle East; or else Bandar would attack the Sochi Winter Olympics and unleash hell in Syria.

Putin rejected this offer.

A few weeks after this threat was issued there was a horrific use of chemical weapons at Ghouta.

Now, throughout last summer The Washington Post was demanding war on Syria, and would issue editorials, sometimes several times per week, demanding that Obama bomb Syria. This was because the Saudi-backed Jihadis were being annihilated. This is why Bandar went to Russia to threaten Putin.

But what was the response of The Guardian?

Along with the rest of the Bilderberg/NATO media, The Guardian immediately and consistently accused Assad of Ghouta, despite abundant and overwhelming evidence and logic that the rebels had chemical weapons, had tested them on live rabbits, and had issued threats on video of using chemical weapons, and they needed something spectacular to provoke an intervention on their behalf.

The whole point of Ghouta was to provoke an overt large scale military intervention by NATO on behalf of the rebels because the rebels were being destroyed by the SAA.

The Guardian played its part in this warmongering by consistently accusing Assad and suggesting, and still suggests, that there should be war on Syria due to the Responsibility to Protect (R2P).

So we have to ask:
1. why do The Guardian and The Washington Post demand war on Syria and not publish all this information regarding the plan revealed to General Wesley Clark and the subsequent wars, the unleashing of cutthroat Jihadis, The (fake) Arab Spring and evidence that the rebels did Ghouta?
2. yet publish the 'revelations' of Ed Snowden about mass surveillance?
3. and why the Pulitzer Board, some of whom are journalists themselves, have not bothered to piece all this together, and if they have then why has it not been published?

And what makes this an even bigger mockery of journalism is that some of the above information came from and has been corroborated by the intrepid journalism of a Pulitzer Prize winner, Seymour Hersh.

I also ask: what exactly have the revelations of Ed Snowden done?

As I detailed yesterday, last weekend I observed the general public and their reaction to a small group of people trying to bring attention to Palestine. Very few people showed any concern. Some even laughed and tutted.

But there wasn't any group protesting mass state surveillance. On the contrary, I would bet that most were thankful for it. Because of al Qaeda.

YET MI5 ALLOWED PREACHERS LIKE MICHAEL ADEBALAJO TO ENCOURAGE MUSLIMS TO JOIN THE JIHAD IN SYRIA AGAINST ASSAD, where they are now being trained by and are fighting alongside al Qaeda in Syria, MI5 having a Covenant of Security with the Islamic extremists.

What was a headline last week? MI5 are concerned that British Jihadis in Syria will return to continue the Jihad in and on Great Britain!!

WHAT A FUCKING CRUEL JOKE IS BEING PLAYED ON THE BRITISH PEOPLE!!

All that Snowden has done has conditioned the British people to ever increasing intrusion in and surveillance of their daily lives by the state. And they are thankful for it because of the boogeyman al Qaeda, that we created and have allied with in Libya and Syria.

What a mockery of journalism.

And of our fathers and grandfathers who risked their lives for freedom and democracy in WW1 and WW2.

A MOCKERY!!

IT'S A BEAUTIFUL MORNING

A Beautiful Morning. The Rascals. (1968) [With lyrics]

HOW TO RIDICULE THE LINK BETWEEN THE FREEMASONS AND THE ASSASSINATION OF ARCH DUKE FERDINAND AND MAKE A CAREER OUT OF IT

In Sarajevo : Political Murder, Joachim Remak ridicules the claims by the assassins of Arch Duke Ferdinand that they were Freemasons, had received the material for the assassination from Freemasons abroad and knew and were encouraged by the fact that Freemasonry had condemned Ferdinand to death 2 years earlier. Remak suggests that the whole story was made up through a series of knocks on the walls made between the assassins during the night before they gave their testimony!!

That night, it seems, Princip and Cabrinovic agreed, by the covert system of knocks which the prisoners used to communicate between their cells, to pursue the subject of the Masons.

[source : Joachim Remak, Sarajevo : Political Murder, Page 225]

However, if it was all made up through a series of knocks on the walls then surely some simple interrogation would have demolished these claims? Not so. Apparently their testimony held up.

Cross-examination would shake neither his nor Princip's testimony.

Remak then mocks General Luddendorf who researched and believed that the assassins were all Freemasons and were part of "a secret department in the British Foreign Office which specialized in political assassinations".

Remak then mocks an article which predicted Ferdinand's assassination that was published on 15th September 1912 in Revue Internationale des Sociétés Secretes, NEARLY TWO YEARS BEFORE Ferdinand was assassinated! But when Remak refers to it he does not state when the article was published. I wonder what Remak would have made of the note written by Diana which predicted the manner of her death.

And Remak refers to several memoirs of high ranking officials...except Kaiser Wilhelm's.

Wilhelm states that he was told by a distinguished German Freemason that Freemasonry had engineered the war to create a power vacuum in Central Europe. That power vacuum was occupied by The League of Nations.

To the victor the spoils. The Allies rewrote history, erased history, mocked history to propagate their views of how and why the war started, and are thus portrayed as innocent.

Remak is considered as one of THE authorities on World War 1. We are told that the general facts about the origin of World War 1 are that a man called Colonel Dragutin Dimitrijevic, aka Apis, as head of the Intelligence Department in the Serbian General Staff, and also a member of the Black Hand, ordered the assassination of Arch Duke Ferdinand, and that he confessed to this.

But here is what Remak says about this:

The exact dates and circumstances of how Franz Ferdinand's murder was planned although not the motives, for those are very plain indeed have never been established with absolute certainty, and probably never will be. The plot's surviving participants have either kept silent or told stories widely at variance with one another, and a written confession left by Apis himself (which was suppressed by a succession of Belgrade governments until its release by Tito's in 1953) is plainly a mixture of truth and untruth. The following account, therefore, can claim no more than that it is based on the most likely among several stories and on the testimony of the more credible among the witnesses, and must remain open to some amount of doubt.

[source : Joachim Remak, Sarajevo : Political Murder, Page 54]

So far from being well established fact, the claim that Apis ordered the assassination is open to some serious doubt. Remak then goes on over several chapters to flesh out the theory that Apis was responsible, and along away mocks the British/Freemasonry theory by suggesting that the assassins made it all up through a series of knocks on the walls at night!!

But the British/Freemasonry theory makes much more sense:
1. Freemasonry had condemned Ferdinand to death in 1912 and was looking for but had not found willing assassins (a fact that Remak conveniently omits);
2. But through Ciganovic Freemasonry supplied the assassins with the material for the assassination;
3. Upon the assassination the British did all they could to encourage war and entice Germany into invading Belgium;
4. And as soon as Germany invaded Belgium the Treaty of London 1839 was cited as the casus belli.

Perhaps General Luddendorf was right. Perhaps there was "a secret department in the British Foreign Office which specialized in political assassinations".

The British had been planning WW1 through Grand Master of the United Grand Lodge of England Prince and later King Edward for decades, establishing a Balkan Committee to manipulate nationalism through organisations created by British agent and top Freemason Giuseppe Mazzini.

IT ALL MAKES PERFECT SENSE!!

ROTHSCHILD RECALL SCAM NOT LOOKING SO SEXY NOW, EH?

It is kicking off in Ukraine.

Our government supported neo Nazis in a violent coup that Victoria Nuland has admitted was financed by the USA to the tune of $5 billion.

In response, the East of Ukraine, having been encouraged by Crimea and seeing the neo Nazis take power in Kiev in the way did, want to join Russia. So they have occupied buildings demanding referendums. NATO accuses Russia of instigating the crisis. Lavrov demands to see the evidence for these accusations, and so far none has been shown. The Kiev fascists have tried intimidation by issuing ultimatums and deadlines...or else. But the deadlines have passed without any action. In fact more pro-Russians have occupied more buildings in other cities demanding referendums.

And the reason why there has been very little action taken by Kiev is because the Ukraine military and police will not execute their orders.

So the neo Nazi thugs are being drafted in.

And it now looks very suspiciously like the Director of the CIA John Brennan went to Ukraine about the same time that the unelected President of Ukraine announced his ultimatums.

#Obama #WhiteHouse admits #CIA boss #Brennan's weekend in #Kiev #Ukraine -At time fascist #Turchinov issued order for violence vs civilians

— WebsterGTarpley (@WebsterGTarpley) April 14, 2014

#Turchinov a Sawdust fascist-Still LITTLE ACTION 12 hours after expiration of #Brennan-inspired ultimatum vs pro-#Russia eastern cities

— WebsterGTarpley (@WebsterGTarpley) April 14, 2014

But instead of really focusing on this, Russia Today wanted to interview the latest member of THE Rothschild banking family, Zac Goldsmith, FOR THE THIRD TIME, about his relatively unimportant recall effort, which was not needed to oust Maria Miller.

And Goldsmith does not even have an exemplary voting and attendance record!!!

WHAT A FUCKING JOKE!!!

EVEN MORE AND EVEN HAPPIER HAPPY HAPPY HUMANS

During a walk on Ilkley Moor today I came to the same very depressing conclusion as last week:

that the human race must be happy with everything that is going on in the world.

Happy with their ignorance.

Happy with the lies they are told.

Happy with bringing children into a world they have no idea about.

Happy with the wars their children may fight due to the lies they are told.

Happy with the wars they pay for due to the lies they are told.

Happy with the state spying on every little thing they do.

Happy with the poverty.

Happy with the austerity.

Happy with the fascism.

Happy. Happy. Happy.

Otherwise, why do they do the things they do instead of seeking out answers to their questions.

And if they don't have any questions as to why the world is such a shit hole then does this imply they are happy?

And otherwise why are they not out on the streets, occupying buildings, demanding change?

Eye-watering austerity to bail out fascist bankers. Intrusive state surveillance (which is far more intrusive and insidious than Snowden is being allowed to reveal). War on Syria via proxy cutthroat Jihadis with the full moral, political, financial and military support of the British government.

And all this in the centenary of World War 1.

Did our ancestors fight and die for this?

During a walk around a North England city last weekend I saw many happy people, many happy couples, many of whom were holding hands, and many of whom accompanied children. There was a very small group of people trying to focus the attention of these happy happy humans onto the plight of Palestine. 99.9% of the happy happy humans walked on by, without a care in the world. There may have been a few glances across to see what all the noise was about. I even heard a few tuts. But the happy happy humans just smiled, held hands, did their shopping, went home, had sex, went out for a few beers down the pub, went home again, perhaps had, or tried to have, sex again in their drunken stupor, then went to sleep.

But it's what they deserve, innit?

After at least 40 hours of brain-numbing soul-destroying drudgery?

Well, that's what they think.

But I wonder what would happen if sex was banned?

Riots. Anarchy. Police helicopters being shot out of the sky. Murder. Arson. Looting. Bloody mayhem.

And there's the rub.

99.9% of people care more about sex than the causes of world war and terrorism. And Palestine is right up there as a major cause of both. But 99.9% of the happy happy humans simply do not care.

And when they are told the causes of war and terrorism they don't want to know, and in some cases even ostracise you!

Perhaps we are just erotic animals.

And if we are then have we been, or are we being, genetically engineered that way, or in other ways? Perhaps electromagnetically? Chemically?

Or by suggesting this am I just making excuses up for heartless, selfish apathy?

Ben Chapman - Erotic Animals - Flesh Mix

AWAY FROM THE NUMBERS

There are a few levels to this, speaking personally.

Perhaps I need to get away from 'the numbers'.

The Jam - Away From the Numbers


Things are getting just too cozy for me
And I see people as they see me
Gonna break away and gain control
You free your mind
You free your soul

I was the type who knocked at old men
(history's easy)
Who together at tables sit and drink beer
(somewhere is really)
Then I saw that I was really the same
So this link's breaking away from the chain

Away from the numbers
Away from the numbers
Is where I'm gonna be
Away from the numbers
Away from the numbers
Is where I am free

Away from the numbers
Away from the numbers
Is where I'm gonna be

I was sick and tired of my little niche
Well gonna break away and find where life is

And all those fools I thought were my friends
(coaching is easy)
They now stare at me and don't see a thing
(reality's so hard)
Till their life is over and they start to moan
How they never had the chance to make good

Away from the numbers
Away from the numbers
Is where I'm gonna be
Away from the numbers
(away from the numbers)
Away from the numbers
Is where I am free
Is where I am free
Is where I'm gonna be
Is reality
Reality's so hard, reality's so hard...

IF WORLD WAR ONE WAS A BAR FIGHT

There is an interesting view of WW1 on the No Glory website.

Michael Gove won't like this. Imagine #WW1 was a bar fight: a different way to understand World War One. http://t.co/yo5nVYKFU8

— Stop the War (@STWuk) April 13, 2014

The general drift is that one nation spilled some beer over another nation and all the others joined in the brawl. In this parody nobody is to blame, and the whole point is that war is senseless.

Yes. War is senseless.

But somebody is to blame.

And that somebody is this Disunited Fascist Queendom.

This is taking the same point of view that John Rees expressed, that the war was going to happen anyway.

THIS IS WRONG!!

For example, the parody begins with this:

Austria demands Serbia buy it a whole new suit because of the new beer stains on its trouser leg.

But who spilled the beer? And why?

The general take is that Serbian revolutionaries killed Arch Duke Ferdinand. So this No Glory parody should possibly instead start with

Austria demands Serbia buy it a whole new suit because Serbia threw some beer over its trouser leg.

This would be a bit more accurate.

But the assassins of Ferdinand were Freemasons, were given the material for the assassination by Freemasons abroad and were encouraged that Freemasonry had condemned Ferdinand to death.

So what would be much more accurate is:

Austria demands Serbia buy it a whole new suit because Serbia, under the orders of British Freemasonry, threw some beer over its trouser leg.

Now that would be much more accurate.

There is also this line in the No Glory parody:

Britain and France ask Germany whether it’s looking at Belgium.

This should be amended to state what should have happened:

Britain and France ask Germany whether it’s looking at Belgium, because if it was then Britain would destroy Germany as soon as Germany even glanced at Belgium.

That is what should have happened. But what actually happened was that:
1. King George V told Kaiser Wilhelm that Great Britain would not become involved in any war;
2. Sir Edward Grey was quite neutral over Belgium and did not make it clear what Great Britain would do if Germany invaded Belgium.

So in this No Glory parody Great Britain is absolved of all responsibility.

But without Great Britain condemning Ferdinand to death in Freemasonic lodges in 1912 there would have been no assassination.

And without British manipulation of the subsequent outrage, by enticing Germany to invade Belgium by not showing any concern or intention to join the brawl, there would have been no war.

So what at first appears to be a rather clever take on WW1 is actually a very dangerous and disappointing pro-establishment apology.

Tut. Tut. Tut.

LEST WE FORGET ZAC GOLDSMITH VOTED FOR WAR ON SYRIA

Why did the self proclaimed maverick vote for war on Syria?

IF ZAC GOLDSMITH WANTS TO CLEAN UP BRITISH POLITICS HE CAN START BY EXPOSING WHAT HE AND HIS IN LAWS THE ROTHSCHILDS KNOW ABOUT 9/11 AND THE SUBSEQUENT WARS

Zac Goldsmith MP has been on Russia Today THREE times pushing recall.

But where does recall come on your list of political priorities? Particularly at this time when there is a real prospect of war with Russia on 2 fronts, Syria and Ukraine? And with all the eye-watering austerity being implemented by Goldsmith's party as the ordinary British taxpayer bails out, and soon bails in, The City of London which is ruled by Goldmsith's in-laws THE Rothschild banking family?

Well, recall comes way down on my list, particularly when Maria Miller was ousted without it.

There is very strong evidence that we have been and currently are engaged in illegal military action because of a little nation that was carved out of the former Ottoman Empire by Goldmsith's in-laws, the Rothschilds. That little nation, which was officially came into existence only in 1948, is now considered the 10th most powerful nation on the planet, possessing a nuclear arsenal that threatens the Middle East, an arsenal that Goldsmith's in-laws are suspected of giving that little nation through treason and espionage against this nation. That little nation stands accused of ignoring a multitude of United Nations resolutions. That little nation killed 1500 people in a contrived war in late 2008 after it provoked some in Gaza to break a ceasefire and kill less than 10 Israelis with rockets.

That little nation is Israel.

In 1996 a document called A Clean Break was written by a demented cabal of rabid Zionists calling for war on Iraq, Iran, Syria and Lebanon (for Hezbollah).

Four years later that same cabal, having formed The Project for a New American Century in 1998, wrote Rebuilding America's Defenses stating that the greatest threats to US national security were...Iraq and Iran. They wrote that they needed a "new Pearl Harbor" to provoke the American people into multiple simultaneous wars across the globe.

That "new Pearl Harbor" was 9/11.

On 9/11 senior and founding members of PNAC were in very, very, very powerful and influential positions in the
US government, military and media apparatus as four alleged hijacked passenger planes flew unimpeded for nearly 2 hours around the most protected airspace in the world before eventually flying one of them into the HQ of the US military, The Pentagon!!

I mean, c'mon people!! WAKE UP!!!!!!

Shortly after this blatant inside Ziojob, General Wesley Clark was told of a plan for war on seven nations in five years: Iraq, Iran, Syria and Lebanon, with Libya, Sudan and Somalia.

Clark accuses senior and founding members of the Zionist PNAC of a foreign policy coup.

You will note that, surprise, surprise, the first four nations named above also appear in A Clean Break.

Although bin Laden was accused of 9/11, authors of A Clean Break were brought in to provide propaganda to blame Israel's enemies.

This is the sequence of wars since 9/11:
Afghanistan (2001) for opium not bin Laden who died from Marfan Syndrome shortly after 9/11.
Iraq (2003)
Lebanon (2006)
Libya (2011)
Syria (2011 - )

By 2007 this plan was moribund, so The Arab Spring was engineered to provide cover for cutthroat Jihadis to be unleashed by Saudi Arabia onto Lebanon, Syria and Iran, but they were first unleashed onto Libya, with NATO acting as their air force.

We are currently supporting morally, politically, financially and militarily medieval barbaric cutthroat Jihadis as they butcher their way through Syria, cutting the throats of defenceless Syrian children on their vain and futile attempt to oust President Bashar al Assad as per this plan revealed to Clark.

If Goldsmith wants to clean up politics he can start by revealing what he and his in-laws the Rothschilds know about 9/11 and all the subsequent wars and medieval cutthroat Jihadis...and all the wars that are planned.

GALLOWAY TWITTERATI FALLING FOR GOLDSMITH PUBLIC RELATIONS SCAM VIA RUSSIA TODAY

Zac Goldsmith is a Member of Parliament for The Conservative Party.

He also recently married into THE Rothschild banking family. His wife is a direct descendant of Nathan Mayer Rothschild who was one of five sons distributed across Europe to take over European banking. N M Rothschild established N M Rothschild in London and was good friends and business partners with Moses Montefiore who married Rothschild's sister. These 2 families, Rothschild and Montefiore are absolutely essential to the advancement of Zionism and thus all the war and terror in the Middle East.

Here are a few responses to the latest appearance of Goldsmith on RT.

@georgegalloway's Sputnik, MP @ZacGoldsmith talks about his recall of bent MP's bill. (12Apr2014) https://t.co/5VOUoQpUU7

— liarpoliticians (@liarpoliticians) April 12, 2014

This twitter account LiarPoliticians describes themselves as

A B'stard who hates the lies and deception of politicians who these days, many are just in it for themselves.

More worryingly, here is Max Keiser describing Rothschild Goldsmith as having "vision".

Gotta get @georgegalloway and @ZacGoldsmith on @KeiserReport for a little right/left debate with these 2 top MP's who both have vision.

— Max Keiser (@maxkeiser) April 8, 2014

Here is another fawning tweet.

@ZacGoldsmith, a diamond in the rough, talks recall with @georgegalloway on@RT_Sputnik - True democracy to scare MPs. http://t.co/tsJDdhwj1O

— Robert j Marston (@robmarstonm) April 13, 2014

So far there is nothing negative, but also no mention whatsoever in any tweet or on any appearance thus far of Goldsmith on Rothschild Russia Today is made that Goldsmith is now a fully paid up member of THE Rothschild banking family and thus carries all that Zionist warmonger terrorist baggage (or pays someone to carry it for him).

WHY?

WHY?

WHY?

WHY?

WHY?

WHY?

WHY?

I'm calling this out as a PR scam by the Rothschilds, in particular Lord Jacob Rothschild.

I shall be following this up with a few questions about RT. I think it has been at the least infiltrated.

ps Galloway has a few doubts about 9/11 but appears to believe in quite a lot of the official 9/11 fairytale.

IS THE SELF PROCLAIMED MAVERICK ZAC GOLDSMITH MP HAVING A LAUGH?

Zac Goldsmith recently married into THE Rothschild banking family. His wife is a direct descendant of Nathan Mayer Rothschild who was sent to London and established N M Rothschild.

Goldsmith appears to be trying to create a reputation as some kind of rebel. However, Goldsmith is...a member of The Conservative Party!!

So my first question is: can you be a rebel if you are both a member of THE Rothschild banking family AND a Conservative MP?

My answer would be, are you having a laugh?

I managed to see Goldsmith on his latest appearance on Russia Today, on George Galloway's Sputnik on Russia Today this morning. Due to the recent scandal surrounding former Conservative Minister Maria Miller, Galloway began bringing attention to Goldsmith's attempt to clean up politics through the introduction of the right to recall.

During the show Goldsmith used the word maverick to describe himself.

And he stated that it is the duty of every MP to hold the government accountable to their constituents.

But how much of a maverick and/or rebel is Goldsmith?

First, we almost went to war on Syria last year. The Marsten House voted against war. But the maverick Goldsmith voted for it!!

And according to The Public Whip, Goldsmith has the following voting record:
Rebellions - 68 votes out of 784 (8.7%)

Attendance - 784 votes out of 1024 (76.6%)

And most of his 'rebellions' are on very minor votes.

On this record, is Goldsmith a 'maverick' and/or a 'rebel'?

Again my answer would be, are you having a laugh?

So:
1. first the anti-bankster Max Keiser has a very chummy chat with this most recent member of THE Rothschild banking family, Zac Goldmsith;
2. a few weeks later Afshin Rattansi interviewed Goldsmith on Going Underground;
3. now the anti-Zionist George Galloway has a very chummy chat with the most recent member of THE Rothschild Zionist family.

On all three appearances the topic was recall.

But we didn't need recall to oust Miller.

There are far more important things in politics than recall, such as the eye-watering austerity that The Conservative Party, for whom Goldsmith is a MP, is implementing due to the muggins British taxpayer bailing out The City of London which is ruled by...The Rothschilds, with its latest member Zac Goldsmith MP!!

I ask again: WTF is going on with Goldsmith and Russia Today?

I ask again: should Russia Today rename itself Rothschild Today?

Please, can anyone who is a constituent of Goldsmith get onto him about (a) his voting record, and (b) how and why his appearances on Russia Today were arranged.

ZAC GOLDSMITH ON RUSSIA TODAY AGAIN

Zac Goldsmith MP is on George Galloway's show on Russia Today, Sputnik. This has to be the strangest combination of host and guest on TV!

Goldsmith was on The Keiser Report late last year pushing his recall motion in a very friendly chat with Max Keiser. Goldsmith will be doing the same on Sputnik. I have yet to see Goldsmith on Sputnik, but here is a photo of Galloway with Goldmsith.

Bahrain: blood on the tracks & @ZacGoldsmith on honour in politics! Don't miss it tomorrow @RT_com @georgegalloway pic.twitter.com/QhAJ9rv0JY

— Sputnik (@RT_sputnik) April 11, 2014

Goldsmith recently married into THE Rothschild banking family. Goldsmith's wife is a direct descendant of the Nathan Mayer Rothschild who came to London and founded NM Rothschild and who allegedly made a fortune out of The Battle of Waterloo by pretending that Wellington had lost when he knew Wellington had won. Goldsmith's wife's sister was at one point married to Goldsmith's brother, so there is definitely a Goldsmith-Rothschild thing going on.

The late father of Goldsmith's wife was a trustee of Yad Hanadiv, a foundation established in memory of Baron Edmond de Rothschild, the Rothschild who began to colonise Palestine for the Zionists. Lord Jacob Rothschild is currently the Chair of the Board of Trustees of Yad Hanadiv.

There has to be something going on here. First anti-bankster Keiser, now anti-Zionist Galloway, inviting Goldsmith onto their shows for chummy chats, particularly when Goldsmith voted for war on Syria? Goldsmith's recall motion is not that important. Maria Miller was ousted without it.

Note how Galloway refers to Goldsmith's quest : honour in politics.

Hmm. Honour in politics.

Can you be a Rothschild and claim honour in politics?

With all that Zionist baggage?

WTF is going on here?

THE GUARDIAN CONTINUES TO SHILL FOR NATO

I have covered at length how The Guardian/Observer group shills for NATO, and is thus part of the NATO media empire. The Guardian/Observer Group:
1. after the horrific events at Ghouta last August immediately and consistently blamed Assad despite overwhelming evidence and logic that the rebels were the culprits;
2. cried with joy that Syria had agreed to relinquish its chemical weapons without mentioning that Israel has a much larger, more devastating and more terrifying arsenal of WMDs that should also be destroyed asap;
3. during the war on Libya pushed for NATO to ignore the spirit of UN SCR 1973 and become the Jihadi Air Force to kill Gaddafi (and has since allowed Owen Jones to shill for NATO by publishing Jones' apology for NATO killing Gaddafi);
4. steadfastly supported convicted embezzler and Rothschild gimp Mikhail Khordokovsky;
5. has not once covered General Wesley Clark and the plan revealed to him for war on seven nations in five years;
6. romanticised the recent events in Ukraine as one of downtrodden masses rebelling against cruel Russophile tyrants when in reality there was a NATO-sponsored violent fascist coup using neo-Nazis to install a pro-IMF, pro-NATO government run by a banker who proudly lists NATO and The National Endowment for Fascism Democracy as partners in his Soros-linked Open Ukraine Foundation.

All this, of course, brings into question the whole Ed Snowden saga, for it was The Guardian who brought us The Snowden Revelations all last summer.

Yesterday NATO released satellite images of what it says is of the build up of Russian forces on the Russia-Ukraine border, possibly in advance of a Russian invasion of Ukraine. The Guardian dutifully reports this NATO view of events, but at least, but only briefly, refers to a Russian response to NATO's claim:

Moscow has denied it is preparing an invading force. The Russian foreign ministry insisted on Wednesday that troops near Ukraine’s border posed no threat and the movements were nothing more than the “everyday activity of Russian troops on its territory”.

[source : Satellite images reveal Russian military buildup on Ukraine's border, The Guardian, http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/apr/10/satellite-images-russian-military-ukraine-border, 10th April 2014]

But as usual, as with the Syrian fighter jet shot down by Turkey a few weeks ago (Turkey was providing cover the rebels entering Syria from Turkey and the jet was attacking the rebels on Syrian soil), The Guardian doesn't quite tell the whole story.

The photographs are of troops on the Russia-Ukraine border...but they were taken in August 2013 during a joint exercise between Russia and Ukraine.

“These shots, which were distributed by NATO, show Russian Armed Forces units of the Southern Military District, which in the summer of last year were taking part in various drills, including near the Ukrainian border,” the General Staff official told RIA Novosti.

Large military drills held in the south of Russia last year included Combat Commonwealth 2013 – a joint air defense exercise of the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS). Back then, Ukrainian troops participated in the international drills.

[source : NATO’s Russian troop build-up satellite images ‘show 2013 drills’, RT, http://rt.com/news/nato-satellite-images-drills-712/, 10th April 2014]

STOP BUYING THE GUARDIAN AND THE OBSERVER!!

YOU ARE ONLY PAYING FOR YOUR OWN PROPAGANDA!!

Read The Truth Serum for free.

DID BRITISH INTELLIGENCE SUPPLY THE CHEMICALS USED BY THE REBELS IN SYRIA? AND IS ROBERT FISK PROTECTING THEM?

Robert Fisk has written about the latest Seymour Hersh article, and drops a quiet bombshell before referring to Hersh:

The Syrian government were, of course, the first to claim that the sarin gas which killed hundreds of Syrian civilians in the Damascus suburb of Ghouta last August had come from Turkey - and had then been used by Islamist groups in the hope that the West would blame Assad and turn its strategic weapons against the regime. When The Independent enquired about the attacks in Syria, Russian sources stated that the chemicals had not been sold to Assad. They had come from stocks sold by Moscow to the former Gaddafi regime in Libya.

[source : Robert Fisk, Turkey's actions in Syria see PM Recep Tayyip Erdogan go from model Middle East 'strongman' to tin-pot dictator, The Independent, http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/turkeys-actions-in-syria-see-pm-recep-tayyip-erdogan-go-from-model-middle-east-strongman-to-tinpot-dictator-9252366.html, 10th April 2014]

The quiet bombshell, if you didn't hear it, was the statement that the Sarin used at Ghouta came from stocks that were in Gaddafi's arsenal.

Fisk then refers to Hersh a paragraph later:

That most controversial of American investigative journalists, Seymour Hersh - I confess he is an old mate of mine even though he often uses my most hated phrase, anonymous “officials” and “experts”, as his sources - has now published his own disturbing and compelling research on the use of chemicals in Syria and points the finger at Turkey for allowing rebels to use sarin in an earlier chemical attack against the Syrian village of Khan al-Assal.

Fisk then refers to Hersh's statement about the rat line running weapons from Gaddafi's looted arsenal to the Syrian rebels via Turkey:

Erdogan, according to Hersh, had allowed the Americans to ship a 'rat line' of weapons from Libya via Turkey to the Syrian rebels - hence the connection to earlier shipments of sarin to Libya from the then Soviet Union. Hersh says that for months after the Ghouta attack occurred, this 'rat line' continued.

Fisk does not go into further details about this rat line.

But here is what Hersh actually said:

A highly classified annex to the report, not made public, described a secret agreement reached in early 2012 between the Obama and Erdoğan administrations. It pertained to the rat line. By the terms of the agreement, funding came from Turkey, as well as Saudi Arabia and Qatar; the CIA, with the support of MI6, was responsible for getting arms from Gaddafi’s arsenals into Syria. A number of front companies were set up in Libya, some under the cover of Australian entities. Retired American soldiers, who didn’t always know who was really employing them, were hired to manage procurement and shipping.

[source : Seymour Hersh, The Red Line and the Rat Line, London Review of Books, http://www.lrb.co.uk/v36/n08/seymour-m-hersh/the-red-line-and-the-rat-line, 4th April 2014]

Two things to note:
1. Fisk states that the Sarin used at Ghouta came from Gaddafi's arsenal;
2. But although Fisk refers to the Hersh article, and mentions the rat line running looted weapons from Gaddafi's arsenal, Fisk does not mention that Hersh stated that MI6 were involved in this.

So is it possible that MI6 helped to supply the Sarin to the Syrian rebels that was used at Ghouta?

And is Fisk helping to cover this up by omitting that MI6 ran looted weapons from Gaddafi's arsenal?

I recently covered the very well hidden role of the British in Syria in BLOODY TREACHEROUS BRITISH INVOLVEMENT IN THE SLAUGHTER IN SYRIA.

DONKEYS LED BY DONKEYS

Or is it iLemmings led by iLemmings?

Or war addicts led by war addicts?

Or sex addicts led by sex addicts?

Maybe all of the above.

Whatever.

It won't be truth addicts leading the world into the abyss. No. They'll be ridiculed, perhaps ostracised, maybe even lynched by a baying mob driven into a rabid frenzy of lust for war, sex, drugs and pointless, banal sudoku.

A PIG WEARING LIPSTICK AT THE TROUGH

@BolsoverBeast: 1: Cabinet minister rips off public for £45k 2: Pays back £5.8k 3: Minister receives £17k for resigning She's up £56.2k

— Tony Gosling (@TonyGosling) April 9, 2014

BLOODY TREACHEROUS BRITISH INVOLVEMENT IN THE SLAUGHTER IN SYRIA

From reading the NATO media you may think that Great Britain has no involvement in Syria, and what involvement there is 'humanitarian' and/or 'nonlethal'.

The latest article by Seymour Hersh adds more evidence that this Disunited Fascist Sceptred Isle has been instigating the slaughter in Syria and, for obvious reasons, has been covering up its bloody involvement.

Here is The Daily Star reporting that British Special Forces were in Syria in late 2011, but that they were there on a sort of reconnaisance mission. However, this suggestion will be destroyed very shortly.

As the unrest and killings escalate in the troubled Arab state, agents from MI6 and the CIA are already in Syria assessing the situation, a security official has revealed.

Special forces are also talking to Syrian dissident soldiers.

They want to know about weapons and communications kit rebel forces will need if the Government decides to help.

“MI6 and the CIA are in Syria to infiltrate and get at the truth,” said the well-placed source.

“We have SAS and SBS not far away who want to know what is happening and are finding out what kit dissident soldiers need.

“Syria supports Hezbollah. That threatens Israel and the whole of the Middle East.

“This has been given the highest priority as the whole thing could implode.

“This is all going like Libya but this will be bigger and bloodier.

[source : Syria will be bloodiest yet, The Daily Star, http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/227911/Syria-will-be-bloodiest-yet, 1st January 2012]

Now, the above report suggests that the British were in Syria on a reconnaissance mission. This following report on an interview by former French foreign minister Roland Dumas destroys that suggestion. Dumas states that as early as 2009 the British were planning on smuggling Jihadis into Syria!

“I’m going to tell you something. I was in England two years before the violence in Syria on other business. I met with top British officials, who confessed to me that they were preparing something in Syria,” said Dumas.

He continued by saying, “This was in Britain not in America. Britain was organizing an invasion of rebels into Syria. They even asked me, although I was no longer minister for foreign affairs, if I would like to participate.”

Responding to a question on the motive behind inciting violence in Syria, Dumas said, "Very simple! With the very simple aim! To overthrow the Syrian government, because in the region, it's important to understand, that the Syrian regime makes anti-Israeli talk,” said Dumas

The former foreign minister added that he had been told by an Israeli prime minister a long time ago that Tel Aviv would seek to “destroy” any country that did not “get along” with it in the region.

[source : UK planned war on Syria before unrest began: French ex-foreign minister, Press TV, http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2013/06/16/309276/uk-planned-war-on-syria-before-unrest/, 16th June 2013]

And now Hersh exposes how MI6 smuggled Gaddafi's weapons into Syria.

A highly classified annex to the report, not made public, described a secret agreement reached in early 2012 between the Obama and Erdoğan administrations. It pertained to the rat line. By the terms of the agreement, funding came from Turkey, as well as Saudi Arabia and Qatar; the CIA, with the support of MI6, was responsible for getting arms from Gaddafi’s arsenals into Syria. A number of front companies were set up in Libya, some under the cover of Australian entities. Retired American soldiers, who didn’t always know who was really employing them, were hired to manage procurement and shipping.

[source : Seymour Hersh, The Red Line and the Rat Line, London Review of Books, http://www.lrb.co.uk/v36/n08/seymour-m-hersh/the-red-line-and-the-rat-line, 4th April 2014]

Gaddafi was killed after UN SCR 1973 was twisted out of all recognition by NATO from a protect-the-civilians to a get-Gaddafi-at-all-costs campaign. British Special Forces played their part by training, arming and guiding the Jihadis on the ground while NATO, supported by The Guardian, became the Jihadi Air Force. The wars on Iraq, Lebanon, Libya and Syria are part of a series of wars revealed to General Wesley Clark shortly after the inside job 9/11. Clark is on Youtube stating this, yet no NATO media will report on it!

The use of Jihadis as a proxy force was exposed by Seymour Hersh as early as 2007 in his The Redirection in which he exposed the plot of the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia to unleash cutthroat Jihadis onto some of the nations named to General Wesley Clark.

Nasr went on, “The Saudis have considerable financial means, and have deep relations with the Muslim Brotherhood and the Salafis”—Sunni extremists who view Shiites as apostates. “The last time Iran was a threat, the Saudis were able to mobilize the worst kinds of Islamic radicals. Once you get them out of the box, you can’t put them back.”

...In the past year, the Saudis, the Israelis, and the Bush Administration have developed a series of informal understandings about their new strategic direction. At least four main elements were involved, the U.S. government consultant told me. First, Israel would be assured that its security was paramount and that Washington and Saudi Arabia and other Sunni states shared its concern about Iran.

Second, the Saudis would urge Hamas, the Islamist Palestinian party that has received support from Iran, to curtail its anti-Israeli aggression and to begin serious talks about sharing leadership with Fatah, the more secular Palestinian group. (In February, the Saudis brokered a deal at Mecca between the two factions. However, Israel and the U.S. have expressed dissatisfaction with the terms.)

The third component was that the Bush Administration would work directly with Sunni nations to counteract Shiite ascendance in the region.

Fourth, the Saudi government, with Washington’s approval, would provide funds and logistical aid to weaken the government of President Bashir Assad, of Syria.

[source : Seymour Hersh, The Redirection, New Worker Magazine, http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2007/03/05/070305fa_fact_hersh?currentPage=all, 5th March 2007]

To give these "worst kinds of Islamic radicals" cover as 'freedom fighters' The Arab Spring was engineered by various NGOs in the USA who trained young radicals from Tunisia and Egypt to kick it all off.

A loose timeline for these events is:
2001 - 9/11 and the plan for war on seven nations in five years implemented, but with a brief call into Afghanistan to kick out the Taliban and restore opium production;
2007 - the war on seven nations in five years was not going so well a Plan B as reported by Seymour Hersh in The Redirection, to unleash cutthroat Jihadis, was implemented, specifically targeting Syria;
2008 - The Arab Spring was engineered to give the cutthroat Jihadis cover as 'freedom fighters';
2009 - Roland Dumas was asked by the British to help them smuggle the cutthroat Jihadis into Syria;
2010 - The Arab Spring begins
2011 - Revolution in Tunisia and Egypt, and NATO begins war on Libya after unleashing the cutthroat Jihadis in a bid to oust Gaddafi;
2011 - After killing Gaddafi the Jihadis and Gaddafi's weapons are transported to Syria, where they have been reinforced by Jihadis from all over the globe in a bid to oust President Bashar al Assad.

The claims of Dumas that Israel is involved can be supported by the document A Clean Break which proposes Israeli aggression on Iraq, Iran, Syria and Lebanon (Lebanon was attacked in 2006).

Besides these reports, there is this evidence from the latest Hersh article referenced above that the British government knew that the horrific events that occured in Ghouta in August last year were not the result of any action of President Bashar al Assad but they were still prepared to attack Syria after blaming Assad.

British intelligence had obtained a sample of the sarin used in the 21 August attack and analysis demonstrated that the gas used didn’t match the batches known to exist in the Syrian army’s chemical weapons arsenal.

...The joint chiefs also knew that the Obama administration’s public claims that only the Syrian army had access to sarin were wrong. The American and British intelligence communities had been aware since the spring of 2013 that some rebel units in Syria were developing chemical weapons.

...Britain and France were both to play a part[in the attack on Syria]. On 29 August, the day Parliament voted against Cameron’s bid to join the intervention, the Guardian reported that he had already ordered six RAF Typhoon fighter jets to be deployed to Cyprus, and had volunteered a submarine capable of launching Tomahawk missiles.

...The UK defence staff who relayed the Porton Down findings to the joint chiefs were sending the Americans a message, the former intelligence official said: ‘We’re being set up here.’

It is time the British people drew their red line in Syria.

I know that I am.

My grandfathers didn't risk their lives invading France in 1944 so that a bunch of fascist cowards could mug us off and spend our hard earned tax supporting and protecting that utopia of freedom, democracy and human rights, The medieval Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, as it unleashes demonically-possessed cutthroat Jihadis onto defenceless Syrian children, and knowingly lies to us to start a war.

Did yours?

And to think that these fuckers stand at the Cenotaph on Remembrance Sunday with solemn faces!!

THE STORY OF LOVE AND HATE AGAIN

Again from one of my favourite films, Do The Right Thing.

From http://www.anyclip.com/movies/do-the-right-thing/love-and-hate/

[there should be a clip from the film here]

Mook : Radio Raheem!

Radio Raheem : Mook.

Mook : What's happening?

Radio Raheem : It's your world.

Mook : Where you headed to?

Radio Raheem : I'm going to get a slice.

Mook : You going to Sal's?

Radio Raheem : I'll check you back there.

Mook : On the rebound.

Radio Raheem : You bet.

Mook : All right.

Oh, shit!

Let me check it out.

That's the hype!

Radio Raheem : Newest latest.

Let me tell you the story of right hand/left hand. It's a tale of good and evil.

Hate.
It was with this hand that Cain iced his brother.

Love.
These five fingers, they go straight to the soul of man.

The right hand...
the hand of love.
The story of life is this...

Static.

One hand is always fighting the other hand,
and the left hand is kicking much ass.
I mean, it looks like the right hand... love... is finished.
But hold on. Stop the presses.
The right hand's coming back.
He got the left hand on the ropes now.
That's right. Yeah. Ooh!
It's a devastating right, and hate is hurt.
Down! Ooh! Ooh!
Left hand, hate, K.O.'d by love.

If I love you, I love you.
But if I hate you...

Mook : There it is... love and hate.

Radio Raheem : I love you, brother.

Mook : Bet. Radio Raheem, check you later. Peace.

HAPPY HAPPY HUMANS

While on a good walk this afternoon on a beautiful South Cumbria fell I came to the very depressing conclusion that the human race must be happy with everything that is going on in the world.

Happy with their ignorance.

Happy with the lies they are told.

Happy with bringing children into a world they have no idea about.

Happy with the wars their children may fight due to the lies they are told.

Happy with the wars they pay for due to the lies they are told.

Happy with the state spying on every little thing they do.

Happy with the poverty.

Happy with the austerity.

Happy with the fascism.

Happy. Happy. Happy.

Otherwise, why do they do the things they do instead of seeking out answers to their questions.

And if they don't have any questions as to why the world is such a shit hole then does this imply they are happy?

WHY DOES HERSH POINT FINGER AT TURKEY NOT SAUDI ARABIA FOR GHOUTA?

In his latest investigation into the horrific event at Ghouta in August last year, Seymour Hersh, through his sources is pointing his finger at Turkey. But can we believe it?

The theory behind this allegation is that Turkey wanted to trick Obama into attacking Syria to remove Assad because if Assad wins then Turkey thinks that it will be a probable target for the defeated rebels.

The evidence for accusing Turkey in this latest article of Hersh rests on intelligence that was gathered on Turkey before and after 21st August. But my doubt in this rests on this statement:

The post-attack intelligence on Turkey did not make its way to the White House.

[source : Seymour Hersh, The Red Line and the Rat Line, http://www.lrb.co.uk/2014/04/06/seymour-m-hersh/the-red-line-and-the-rat-line, 4th April 2014]

So why was this intelligence reportedly not passed to the White House then but is being leaked out now?

This accusation that Turkey is the culprit behind Ghouta is made stronger by the recent secret recording of high level Turkish officials plotting a false flag attack to give Turkey the pretext to start war on Syria.

I find the timing of that secret recording and this article of Hersh more than coincidental.

Who made that recording? And why?

A week or two before Ghouta I predicted that a huge false flag attack was about to occur in Syria after reading a report on the meeting between Prince Bandar bin Sultan and President Vladimir Putin last summer. I urged you all to inform your MPs about it. In that meeting Bandar issued a lovely threat to Putin: if Putin would dump Assad then Saudi Arabia would buy multi billions of dollars worth of weapons from Russia and allow Russia to operate in the Middle East; if not then terrorists would be unleashed onto the Sochi Winter Olympics and hell on earth would be unleashed in Lebanon and Syria.

Note that no such meeting occured between a Turkish official and Putin.

Putin rejected this deal.

Shortly after this meeting the HQ of Hezbollah in Lebanon was attacked, and since then Lebanon has slowly descended into chaos again, with bombing after bombing after bombing following a period of relative calm after the Israeli-engineered war on Hezbollah in 2006.

Also note that after Ghouta that Russia was much more interested in Saudi Arabia than Turkey.

However, Turkey is not blameless. Turkey has been playing a covert role in the illegal war on Syria, allowing the rebels to live in and enter Syria from Turkey. Over the last week or two, rebels entered Syria with the overt military assistance from Turkey, who bombarded Syrian military positions in Syria as rebels entered Syria from Turkey and shot down a Syrian fighter jet as it was attacking the aforementioned rebels. On 11th May last year two car bombs exploded in Reyhanli in Turkey. Turkey immediately blamed Syria. A few days later Turkish PM Erdogan was in Washington DC demanding that Syria had crossed Obama's red line. Obama wisely rejected the accusation. But on 27th March this year Turkey finally admitted that al Qaeda had bombed Reyhanli.

Speaking at the 992nd meeting of the Permanent Council of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) on March 27, Turkey’s Ambassador Tacan Ildem was the first Turkish official to state that the Reyhanli attack was carried out by al-Qaeda: “More recently a massive bomb attack in the Reyhanli town center, carried out by al-Qaeda elements operating out of Syria, caused 52 deaths and 146 injuries,” he said.

[source : Turkey admits Reyhanli was attacked by al-Qaeda, Al Monitor, www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2014/04/reyhanli-qaeda-bombing-attack-admits.html, 4th April 2014]

It is one thing to blame a car bomb on Syria when you know it was al Qaeda, but several levels above that to organise a false flag attack to kill hundreds of people to trick the USA into a war.

Of the two nations, Turkey and Saudi Arabia, who has the form?

Turkey is accused of a genocide of Armenians. But that was nearly 100 years ago. But since then?

But Saudi Arabia has already been involved in something similar but much more nefarious and much more recently; 9/11.

9/11 involved hijacking passenger planes to attack America on its own soil, killing nearly 3000. Whoever organised that can organise something like Ghouta.

Saudi Arabia's role in 9/11 is being protected by someone, and this latest Hersh article could be in the same league. I am not accusing Hersh of being an asset, but I am wondering why Saudi Arabia is barely mentioned in this latest Hersh article.

It was Hersh who reported The Redirection in March of 2007 which accused the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia of conspiring to unleash the nastiest cutthroat Jihadis onto Iran, Syria and Lebanon, a prediction that has come true. So Hersh cannot be dismissed easily.

Some corroboration can be taken from the article by Dale Gavlak and Yahya Ababneh published by Mint Press which accused Prince Bandar bin Sultan and Jabhat al-Nusra (JAN) of smuggling chemical weapons into Ghouta which exploded by accident after they were handled by rebels not trained to handle them. Hersh mentions JAN several times in his article but links them to Turkey not Saudi Arabia.

Prime Minister Recep Erdoğan was known to be supporting the al-Nusra Front, a jihadist faction among the rebel opposition, as well as other Islamist rebel groups. ‘We knew there were some in the Turkish government,’ a former senior US intelligence official, who has access to current intelligence, told me, ‘who believed they could get Assad’s nuts in a vice by dabbling with a sarin attack inside Syria – and forcing Obama to make good on his red line threat.’

So:
1. Turkey has form in trying to trick the USA into attacking Syria by stating that Syria attacked Reyhanli last May, but now says that it was al Qaeda;
2. Turkey has form in plotting false flag attacks, as shown by that recent secret recording;
3. but Saudi Arabia has much more form from:
a) its involvement in attacking the USA itself on 9/11;
b) threatening Russia with unleashing hell in Syria;
c) accusations by residents of Ghouta that Saudi Arabia and JAN had chemicals in Ghouta.

PUT OUR HEADS TOGETHER AGAIN

I posted this a few weeks ago, but I think it is fantastic and says a lot, much more than anything that that talentless doped-up Miley Cyrus can say.

DESTROYING CAREERS

Am I the only person in this Disunited Fascist Queendom who is pushing the FACT that it was the British monarchy through its network of Freemasonry who engineered World War One?

Take this little speech by John Rees that was tweeted on Stop The War.

@JohnWRees at #WW1 Great Debate on lessons of war for today @STWuk http://t.co/WzlHLECl1r

— Dan Poulton (@heedlines) April 3, 2014

Rees appears to be arguing that the war was going to happen anyway because it was all about competing empires, but at the same time appears to be suggesting that WW2 was a consequence of WW1, and that the roots of WW1 were sewn much earlier than June 1914. Unfortunately, in this short clip Rees does not elaborate on his argument, and I would be very interested to find out what he said, because as I understand it he is not far wrong.

Except on one very crucial point.

Rees' statement that the war was going to happen anyway is wrong, and absolves the aforementioned culprits of any blame for the mass ritual slaughter that we call World War 1.

My first question is: is world government the ultimate empire?

The answer is, of course it is...but only if you control it!

The USA, Germany and Russia were cooperating, not building empires. These three were implementing The American System of Economics and rapidly developing through trade routes via land-based trains beyond the reach of the British Navy. The British Empire was the greatest at that time but could not fight all 3 on its own. So it got them to fight each other. This was engineered through The Balkan Committee (see How the British Crown created the Balkan powderkeg by Joseph Brewda), the British Freemasonic network killed Arch Duke Ferdinand, and Sir Edward Grey and King George V tricked Germany into invading Belgium. Kaiser Wilhelm later wrote that he was told by a distinguished Freemason that Freemasonry engineered the war to create a power vacuum in Central Europe.

What replaced The Austro-Hungarian Empire? The League of Nations.

Who suggested The League of Nations? The first mention I can find is from none other than Sir Edward Grey, who got his fellow conspirator Colonel Edward Mandel House, who was the top adviser to KKK supporter President Woodrow Wilson, to propose The League of Nations in a speech he wrote for Wilson.

And because World War 1 did not produce the world government that the British Empire wanted, because the rebellious USA voted out of The League of Nations, the Anglophile nest of Wall Street agents created both Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia in preparation for World War 2.

After WW2 The League of Nations was replaced by the European Union, while the world government moved to New York and is now called The United Nations.

The rest, as they say, is history.

Or is it?

I cannot read any of this anywhere, not even on any anti-war site.

So, why are the anti-war movement and historians such as Professor Niall Ferguson ignoring this slam dunk evidence that the British monarchy through its network of Freemasonry engineered World War 1 and World War 2 to create a world government as the ultimate form of empire?

Would acknowledging this destroy a lot of careers?

LITTLE BOY SOLDIERS

As NATO continues its unnecessary and naked aggression on behalf of the Bohemian Grove Satanist kleptocracy by pushing right up to Russia's border with Ukraine, here is a little song I grew up with.

There is a line in the lyrics that says:

It was done beneath the flag of democracy.

That should be amended to read:

It was done beneath the flag of kleptocracy.

The Jam - Setting sons - Little boy soldiers


It's funny how you never knew what my name was.
Our only contact was a form for the election.
These days I find that I don't listen,
These days I find that we're out of touch.
These days I find that I'm too busy.
So why the attention now you want my assistance -
What have you done for me?

You've gone and got yourself in trouble.
Now you want me to help you out.

These days I find that I can't be bothered,
These days I find that it's all too much,
To pick up a gun and shoot a stranger,
But I've got no choice so here I come - war games.

I'm up on the hills, playing little boy soldiers,
Reconnaissance duty up at 5:30.
Shoot shoot shoot and kill the natives,
You're one of us and we love you for that.

Think of honour, Queen and country,
You're a blessed son of the British Empire,
God's on our side and so is Washington.

Come out on the hills with the little boy soldiers.
Come out on the hills play the little boy soldiers.
Come out on the hills play the little boy soldiers.

Come on outside - I'll sing you a lullaby,
Or tell a tale of how goodness prevailed.

We ruled the world - we killed and robbed,
The fucking lot - but we don't feel bad.

It was done beneath the flag of democracy kleptocracy.
You'll believe.
And I do - yes I do - yes I do -
yes I do - yes I do - yes I do!

These days I find that I can't be bothered,
To argue with or well, what's the point?
Better to take your shots and drop down dead,
then they send you home in a pine overcoat

With a letter to your mum

Saying find enclosed one son, one medal and a note to say he won.

IS THERE MORE TO THE OUSTING OF BRENDAN EICH?

For Windows OS there are three contenders for most popular browser: MS Internet Explorer, Google Chrome and Mozilla Firefox. MS is Bill Gates. Google is CIA/NSA.

But what about Mozilla?

Eich was with Mozilla virtually from the start, and with his tech knowledge and creativity has helped to build Mozilla into a force with some very popular products.

His appointment as CEO of Mozilla provoked a campaign from OKCupid to boycott Mozilla. OKCupid is currently owned by IAC/InterActiveCorp. The Chairman of IAC/InterActiveCorp is Barry Diller. Diller has an impressive background in media and entertainment, creating Fox. Diller currently has several other positions. He has sat on the board of Coca Cola since 2002.

So how did the decision of OKCupid to boycott Mozilla arise?

So far I cannot find anything on this.

However, Eich was the focus of this campaign by OKCupid because of his support for anti gay marriage law. This is being widely reported in most media.

But did you know that,

In fact, Eich is sponsoring Ascend, a project that helps “underemployed, LGBTQ, Latin@, and African American populations” get in-depth technical training and support from the open-source community.

[source : The public trial of Mozilla CEO Brendan Eich (interview), VentureBeat, http://venturebeat.com/2014/04/02/the-public-trial-of-mozilla-ceo-brendan-eich-interview/, 2nd April 2014]

So:
1. how did the decision to boycott Mozilla by OKCupid arise?
2. does this action lend more support to the NATO gay agenda which is beginning to force homosexuality onto us as part of the population control agenda?
3. is this an attack on Mozilla for not acquiescing to the full spectrum domination agenda of the intelligence agencies?