Of course, Palestine is far too small to accommodate more than a fraction of the Jewish race, nor do the majority of national Jews wish to go there. But if, as may well happen, there should be created in our own lifetime by the banks of the Jordan a Jewish State under the protection of the British Crown, which might comprise three or four millions of Jews, an event would have occurred in the history of the world which would, from every point of view, be beneficial, and would be especially in harmony with the truest interests of the British Empire.
[source : ZIONISM versus BOLSHEVISM : A STRUGGLE FOR THE SOUL OF THE JEWISH PEOPLE, Sunday Herald, http://www.adespicabletruce.org.uk/page83.html, 8th February 1920]
Sunday, January 31, 2016
PURE ZIONIST MICHAEL DUGHER THREATENS CORBYN IN ORTHODOX RIGHT WING DAILY MAIL
You can't make this stuff up: in the right wing Daily Mail, a Labour MP, very prominent and active in Labour Friends of Israel, has threatened Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn by issuing 4 targets for Corbyn:
Dugher gave the keynote speech at the We Believe in Israel conference last year, when he said this:
You mean terrorism and blowing defenceless kids to bits?
Winning the London mayoral election – as many expect – would 'not be enough'; Labour must gain up to 300 seats in English town halls, hold on to power in Wales and make inroads into the SNP's control of the Scottish Parliament. 'Jeremy has said we did badly in Scotland because we weren't Left-wing enough – we'll see if that is right,' he says, throwing down the gauntlet.
...Dugher, former spin doctor to Gordon Brown, is a reverse image of pro-Palestinian, shell-suited, Left-wing, national-anthem-mumbling, vegetarian, teetotal, pacifist Corbyn.
Robustly pro-Israel, ('most of us Labour Right-wingers are'), sharp suited ('my constituents expect me to be smart') and staunchly patriotic ('I belt out the national anthem'), he also sends himself up: 'I eat the occasional vegetable and have a sherry at Christmas.'
In fact Dugher is one of the few MPs who could drink Nigel Farage under the table. His idea of a night out is six pints of Guinness with his muckers and a curry rounded off by karaoke, where show-off Dugher hogs the limelight with pitch-perfect renditions of Sinatra classics.
[source : You have 99 days to prove you can win, or it'll be time to go: Top Labour rebel issues 'May Day' election warning to Comrade Corbyn, Daily Mail, http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3424749/You-99-days-prove-win-ll-time-tell-Politburo-power-Soviets-won-t-cut-masses-Labour-rebel-issues-day-election-warning-Comrade-Corbyn.html, 31st January 2016]
Dugher gave the keynote speech at the We Believe in Israel conference last year, when he said this:
...the reason I support Israel – the reason I believe in Israel – is because, like America, Israel is more than just a country.
It’s an idea. An idea founded on a set of values and principles.
An idea that is worth fighting for.
...The founding fathers of the State of Israel built a country on a rock of great ideals: democracy; liberty; rights for all citizens; freedom of religion; opportunity; social justice; and equality.
...In 1948, talking about the creation of the State of Israel, President Truman said: “I believe it has a glorious future before it. As not just another sovereign nation, but as an embodiment of the great ideals of our civilisation.”
These ideals are still very much alive in Israel today.
[source : LFI vice chair ,Michael Dugher MP, gives keynote speech at ‘We Believe in Israel’ conference, Labour Friends of Israel, http://www.lfi.org.uk/lfi-vice-chair-michael-dugher-mp-gives-keynote-speech-at-we-believe-in-israel-conference/,22nd March 2015]
You mean terrorism and blowing defenceless kids to bits?
T4 TORIES TRY TO PROTECT BRITISH TAX HAVENS USED BY NSA-CIA-GOOGLE
Says it all really: the T4 Tories are trying to protect British tax havens, such as Bermuda, which are used by companies such as the NSA/CIA creature we know and love as Google to dodge/evade/avoid tax.
From The Observer:
11% of £ 30 billion, the share from the UK market, is £ 3.3 billion.
So shouldn't we be taxing the NSA/CIA creature Google, which is trying to enslave us all, at British tax rates on this £ 3.3 billion?
Last week it was announced to great fanfare that Google would pay £ 130 million in back tax from the last 10 years.
But even if this was from just one year, this paltry sum would be just 4%!!
So here we have Bilderberger George Osborne trying to protect Google, which is trying to enslave us all, by agreeing that they would pay in tax at the most just 4% on their profits from the UK!!
From The Observer:
Google is expected to announce on Monday that it has amassed £30bn of profits from non-US sales in Bermuda, where companies are not liable to pay corporation tax. The UK is Google’s largest non-US market, accounting for 11% of its global revenues, according to documents filed in America.
11% of £ 30 billion, the share from the UK market, is £ 3.3 billion.
So shouldn't we be taxing the NSA/CIA creature Google, which is trying to enslave us all, at British tax rates on this £ 3.3 billion?
Last week it was announced to great fanfare that Google would pay £ 130 million in back tax from the last 10 years.
But even if this was from just one year, this paltry sum would be just 4%!!
So here we have Bilderberger George Osborne trying to protect Google, which is trying to enslave us all, by agreeing that they would pay in tax at the most just 4% on their profits from the UK!!
Tories lobbying to protect Google’s £30bn island tax haven https://t.co/Z5rHlFzAfl
— The Guardian (@guardian) January 30, 2016Saturday, January 30, 2016
WHY DONALD GUMP WOULD NOT BE SO BAD FOR THE WALL STREET WARMONGERS
1. Gump loves Israel (still), and in particular Netanyahu, even though in 2014 Netanyahu blew 520 defenceless kids in Gaza to bits;
2. Gump would defend Saudi Arabia, and believes that it is Iran who is the aggressor in the Middle East;
3. Gump is attacking or praising individual Federal Reserve managing personnel for their policies, but not The Federal Reserve system istelf, which needs to be brought into public ownership and, as Webster Tarpley suggests, create trillions in zero interest loans for infrastructure and education.
So although he may not be a member of the establishment in the USA, unlike the Clintons and Bushes of this world, he would not be so bad for the Wall Street warmongers. They would more than likely get their wars and retain their economic power. And after a few years in The White House he may well be very much under their control through advisers and intelligence.
If and when Gump starts talking about re-investigating 9/11, then I'll give him a little support.
But until then, he will be to me just yet another privileged fascist clown for the rich.
2. Gump would defend Saudi Arabia, and believes that it is Iran who is the aggressor in the Middle East;
3. Gump is attacking or praising individual Federal Reserve managing personnel for their policies, but not The Federal Reserve system istelf, which needs to be brought into public ownership and, as Webster Tarpley suggests, create trillions in zero interest loans for infrastructure and education.
So although he may not be a member of the establishment in the USA, unlike the Clintons and Bushes of this world, he would not be so bad for the Wall Street warmongers. They would more than likely get their wars and retain their economic power. And after a few years in The White House he may well be very much under their control through advisers and intelligence.
If and when Gump starts talking about re-investigating 9/11, then I'll give him a little support.
But until then, he will be to me just yet another privileged fascist clown for the rich.
Friday, January 29, 2016
IT IS SUCH BEAUTIFUL WEATHER FOR THE BOLTON MONARCHY TO DELETE THOSE REPORTS
If you have nothing else to do over this shit weekend but treat me like I am a piece of shit (like yo have done for the last year or so), then why not delete those reports?
It's dead easy.
If you don't trust what I say in those reports (which would explain why you have not deleted them) then delete them.
But if you do trust them but haven't been arsed to offer to help me then what does that say about you?
But remember this: I didn't flog you them. I gave them to you free in great trust.
That trust has been betrayed.
It's dead easy.
If you don't trust what I say in those reports (which would explain why you have not deleted them) then delete them.
But if you do trust them but haven't been arsed to offer to help me then what does that say about you?
But remember this: I didn't flog you them. I gave them to you free in great trust.
That trust has been betrayed.
PWEASE DON'T VIOLATE THE SAFE SPACE OF INFOWHORES AND HURT THEIR FEEWINGS
That safe space is the following total abomination and disgrace: President Andrew Jackson, brutal holder of 300 slaves for his plantation The Hermitage, and misguided fool of British agent Martin van Buren, who used Jackson to destroy America's wealth and economy by withdrawing America's wealth from The Second Bank of the United States of America and placing it all in the banks his mates owned and ran, who then used that wealth to speculate by creating money out of thin air, which evetually led to the panic of 1837 and the crash of the American economy.
But there is one big problem: Infowhores love the guy!!! Jackson, that is. Alex 'my ancestors fought for the Confederacy' Jones regularly plays songs praising Jackson!!
So, if you feel that there is something seriously wrong with Andrew Jackson, pwease don't violate the safe space of Infowhores and hurt their feewings by pointing out just what a total fucktard Jackson was by instigating The Trail of Tears after a Cherokee had saved his life, Jackson thanking his Cherokee saviour by telling him that Jackson would forever be his bestest mate in the whole wide world.
Some mate Jackson musy have been, eh?
I'm sorry, Infowhores. I violated your safe space then I shall say a thousand Hail Donald Gump's for penance.
But there is one big problem: Infowhores love the guy!!! Jackson, that is. Alex 'my ancestors fought for the Confederacy' Jones regularly plays songs praising Jackson!!
So, if you feel that there is something seriously wrong with Andrew Jackson, pwease don't violate the safe space of Infowhores and hurt their feewings by pointing out just what a total fucktard Jackson was by instigating The Trail of Tears after a Cherokee had saved his life, Jackson thanking his Cherokee saviour by telling him that Jackson would forever be his bestest mate in the whole wide world.
Some mate Jackson musy have been, eh?
I'm sorry, Infowhores. I violated your safe space then I shall say a thousand Hail Donald Gump's for penance.
INFOWHORES
The problem with infowars is this:
Have Infowars retracted all that bullshit white-supremacist adulation of President Andrew 'Turd' Jackson?
Naarrp.
All that bravado. All that confidence. All that arrogance. All that derring do.
And what do you get?
Half-truths (at best) and being flogged into a rip-off in the bargain!
But the sad, sad situation is this: Infowars is not, repeat not, alone.
BTW, I think we had better start asking why PJW likes to dress up as an animal.
Transanimal? Is that even a word?
They have to make a living
so they're flogging instead of giving.
Have Infowars retracted all that bullshit white-supremacist adulation of President Andrew 'Turd' Jackson?
Naarrp.
All that bravado. All that confidence. All that arrogance. All that derring do.
And what do you get?
Half-truths (at best) and being flogged into a rip-off in the bargain!
But the sad, sad situation is this: Infowars is not, repeat not, alone.
BTW, I think we had better start asking why PJW likes to dress up as an animal.
Transanimal? Is that even a word?
HILARIOUS PISS TAKE OF DONALD TRUMPETY GUMP
Donald Trumpety Gump has changed his accent!!
WATCH: Brit actor gives Donald Trump cockney accent and the results are hilarious https://t.co/ZZW5i3BMiB pic.twitter.com/skqmR62sWi
— Daily Star (@Daily_Star) January 29, 2016TTS VERY BELATED TWEET OF THE DAY
This was posted 7 months ago:
So what does this tweet actually say?
It says that although Trumpety Trump says he wants to Make America Great Again by bringing jobs back to America, when he has the opportunity to lead by example he fucks it up...BIG TIME...and uses cheap Mexican labour instead!!
And Trump wants Mexico to build a wall along the US-Mexican border. Why? To keep Mexicans out but not his products made from cheap Mexican labour? Are his products going to be thrown over the wall?
But this is about par: Trump is a privileged, white American male, who was 'given' Manhattan by his racist father, who built on the fortune of the original immigrant Trump (that was derived from brothels) by misrepresentation, profiteering of WW2 veterans and renting to whites only.
BTW, how's that re-education of Trumpety Trump goin'? I haven't heard him shout his mouth off about 9/11 yet.
🐸☕️ pic.twitter.com/19h8BOQSrF
— Adrian Carrasquillo (@Carrasquillo) July 1, 2015So what does this tweet actually say?
It says that although Trumpety Trump says he wants to Make America Great Again by bringing jobs back to America, when he has the opportunity to lead by example he fucks it up...BIG TIME...and uses cheap Mexican labour instead!!
And Trump wants Mexico to build a wall along the US-Mexican border. Why? To keep Mexicans out but not his products made from cheap Mexican labour? Are his products going to be thrown over the wall?
But this is about par: Trump is a privileged, white American male, who was 'given' Manhattan by his racist father, who built on the fortune of the original immigrant Trump (that was derived from brothels) by misrepresentation, profiteering of WW2 veterans and renting to whites only.
BTW, how's that re-education of Trumpety Trump goin'? I haven't heard him shout his mouth off about 9/11 yet.
SURPRISE! OXFORD UNIVERSITY TO KEEP STATUE OF RACIST RHODES BECAUSE A SMALL NUMBER OF DONORS EACH THREATEN TO WITHHOLD THEIR MILLION POUND DONATIONS
Oriel College has decided to keep their statue of the blatant racist and British imperialist Cecil Rhodes.
Why?
Because the college relies on a small number of donors, most of whom are alumni, each of whom have either stopped their million pound donations or have threatened to withhold their million pound donations!
And as graduates of Oxford University are overwhelmingly while and male then we can then assume that most of, if not all, of these donors are white and male.
Basically, Rhodes attended Oxford for just 3 months but then went to South Africa financed by the Rothschilds and built a monopoly of South African diamonds, doing so using brutality and racist laws. He became that rich that he created a country, which was named after him: Rhodesia, now known as Zimbabwe. The fortune from that monopoly was then left to Lord Alfred Milner to build a world government that Great Britain would control. Milner is seriously implicated in the engineering of events leading upto and during WW1.
With this decision Oxford Univeristy has shown that it hasn't got a clue about history (or if it does it does not wish to propagate true history), and that it is beholden to a super-rich white, male cabal.
Why?
Because the college relies on a small number of donors, most of whom are alumni, each of whom have either stopped their million pound donations or have threatened to withhold their million pound donations!
And as graduates of Oxford University are overwhelmingly while and male then we can then assume that most of, if not all, of these donors are white and male.
Basically, Rhodes attended Oxford for just 3 months but then went to South Africa financed by the Rothschilds and built a monopoly of South African diamonds, doing so using brutality and racist laws. He became that rich that he created a country, which was named after him: Rhodesia, now known as Zimbabwe. The fortune from that monopoly was then left to Lord Alfred Milner to build a world government that Great Britain would control. Milner is seriously implicated in the engineering of events leading upto and during WW1.
With this decision Oxford Univeristy has shown that it hasn't got a clue about history (or if it does it does not wish to propagate true history), and that it is beholden to a super-rich white, male cabal.
Wednesday, January 27, 2016
SURPRISE! BELGIUM WAS AWARE OF PARIS TERROR CELL IN 2012
Well. Well. Well.
Would you Adam-and-Steve it?
It looks like Belgium was aware of the terror cell that attacked Paris last November. I am not surprised by this. Belgiun is the home of NATO. NATO ran Operation Gladio a few decades ago to terrorise Europe. The Paris terror cell was based just a few miles down the road from NATO HQ in Brussells. The Paris terror led to both France and the UK bombing Syria.
From the RT report:
Would you Adam-and-Steve it?
It looks like Belgium was aware of the terror cell that attacked Paris last November. I am not surprised by this. Belgiun is the home of NATO. NATO ran Operation Gladio a few decades ago to terrorise Europe. The Paris terror cell was based just a few miles down the road from NATO HQ in Brussells. The Paris terror led to both France and the UK bombing Syria.
From the RT report:
Belgian security services knew about the terrorist cell responsible for the fatal Paris attacks in November 2015 for over three years, local paper reports.
Brussels-based Het Laatste Nieuws (HLN) newspaper claims to have come in possession of a security service paper dating April 2012, which indicated some suspicious activity in an apartment in the Brussels district of Molenbeek.
The officers recorded residents discussing possible attacks against Western democracy and ways to acquire explosives and weapons. The cell members also traveled to Syria several times, the paper says.
The apartment belonged to Gelel Attar, currently in detention over suspicion of being directly involved in Paris terror attacks on November 13 last year.
Attar was considered to be the right hand of recruiter Khalid Zerkani, who sent two other Paris attackers to Syria, including the assault’s coordinator Abdelhamid Abaaoud. Zerkani is reported to have been present at the Molenbeek apartment meetings in 2012, however Belgian security hesitated to arrest him as it would result in shutting down Zerkani’s network, HLN says.
Attar, a Belgian of Moroccan origin, was apprehended in the town of Mohammedia near Casablanca, Morocco, on January 15, after traveling through Turkey, Germany, the Netherlands and Belgium, media report.
The alleged Islamic State (IS, formerly ISIS/ISIL) member was detained on an international arrest warrant, issued after he was convicted in absentia last year and sentenced to five years of prison for participation in the activities of a terrorist group by Belgian court, Eric Van Der Sypt, a spokesman for the Belgian federal prosecutor, said as cited by local media. However he expressed doubt that Attar will be extradited to Belgium, as Morocco does not normally surrender its nationals.
Belgian security was aware of Paris Attackers’s terror cell since 2012 - report https://t.co/QOCMcwUKuZ pic.twitter.com/0bPxhrf5mZ
— RT (@RT_com) January 26, 2016MEET WINSTON CHURCHILL
In his attack on socialism few weeks ago, PJW quoted Winston Churchill attacking socialism (he also quoted Jimmy Savile bestest mate Margaret Thatcher).
But who was Churchill? What did he stand for?
There is this myth that he was a moral British bulldog who won WW2 singlehandedly. But I ask: why is what he knew about the Japanese fleet in dearly December 1941 still secret? I think he knew what was the Japanese fleet was doing and what its ultimate target was but he did not inform FDR. There is sufficient evidence that the British had broken not just the Japanese diplomatic code but also their military code. On the otherhand, the USA had broken the diplomatic code but only a fraction of the Japanese military code. The British were keeping FDR out of the loop. In fact, in the film Tora! Tora! Tora! there is a brief scene in which on the wall in an office of intelligence there is a list of personnel who were being informed of what the British knew...and FDR is not listed! So in my opinion Churchill let the Japanese fleet sneak upon Pearl Harbour in order to drag the USA into WW2.
But besides this, the list of Churchill's crimes against humanity is very, very long. Here are just a few of them.
No wonder PJW quoted Churchill!!
But who was Churchill? What did he stand for?
There is this myth that he was a moral British bulldog who won WW2 singlehandedly. But I ask: why is what he knew about the Japanese fleet in dearly December 1941 still secret? I think he knew what was the Japanese fleet was doing and what its ultimate target was but he did not inform FDR. There is sufficient evidence that the British had broken not just the Japanese diplomatic code but also their military code. On the otherhand, the USA had broken the diplomatic code but only a fraction of the Japanese military code. The British were keeping FDR out of the loop. In fact, in the film Tora! Tora! Tora! there is a brief scene in which on the wall in an office of intelligence there is a list of personnel who were being informed of what the British knew...and FDR is not listed! So in my opinion Churchill let the Japanese fleet sneak upon Pearl Harbour in order to drag the USA into WW2.
But besides this, the list of Churchill's crimes against humanity is very, very long. Here are just a few of them.
To the vast majority of the world, where the sun once never set on the British empire, Winston Churchill remains a great symbol of racist Western imperialist tyranny, who stood on the wrong side of history.
The myth of Churchill is Britain’s greatest propaganda tool because it rewrites Churchill’s true history in order to whitewash Britain’s past imperialist crimes against humanity. The Churchill myth also perpetuates Britain’s ongoing neo-colonial and neo-liberal policies, that still, to the is day, hurt the very people around the world that Churchill was alleged to have helped civilise.
The same man whose image is polished and placed on British mantelpieces as a symbol of all that is Great about Britain was an unapologetic racist and white supremacist. “I hate Indians, they are a beastly people with a beastly religion”, he once bellowed. As Churchill put it, Palestinians were simply “barbaric hordes who ate little but camel dung.”
...Apart from being an unrepentant racist, Churchill was also a staunch proponent of the use of terrorism as a weapon of war.
During the Kurdish rebellion against the British dictatorship in 1920, Churchill remarked that he simply did not understand the “squeamishness” surrounding the use of gas by civilized Great Britain as a weapon of terror. “I am strongly in favour of using gas against uncivilised tribes, it would spread a lively terror,” he remarked.
In the same year, as Secretary of State for War, Churchill sent the infamous Black and Tans to Ireland to fight the IRA. The group became known for vicious terrorist attacks on civilians which Churchill condoned and encouraged.
...Churchill’s legacy in the Far East, Middle East, South Asia and Africa is certainly not one of an affable British Lionheart, intent on spreading civilization amongst the natives of the world. To people of these regions the imperialism, racism, and fascism of a man like Winston Churchill can be blamed for much of the world’s ongoing conflicts and instability.
...The arbitrary lines drawn in Middle Eastern sand by Churchillian imperialism were never going to withstand the test of time. To this day, Churchill’s actions have denied Jordanians, Iraqis, Kurds and Palestinians anything resembling true democracy and national stability.
The intractable Israeli-Palestinian conflict can also be traced directly back to Churchill’s door at number 10 Downing Street and his decision to hand over the “Promised Land” to both Arabs and Jews. Churchill gave practical effect to the Balfour declaration of 1917, which expressed Britain’s support for the creation of a Jewish homeland, resulting in the biggest single error of British foreign policy in the Middle East.
...Pulitzer-prize winning historian, Professor Caroline Elkins, highlights Churchill’s many crimes in Kenya in her book Britain’s Gulag: The Brutal End of Empire in Kenya. Professor Elkins explains how Churchill’s soldiers “whipped, shot, burned, and mutilated Mau Mau suspects”, all in the name of British “civilization”. It is said that President Obama’s grandfather Hussein Onyango Obama never truly recovered from the torture he endured from Churchill’s men.
The Nobel Prize-winning economist Amartya Sen has proved how in Bengal in 1943 Churchill engineered one of the worst famines in human history for profit.
Over three million civilians starved to death whilst Churchill refused to send food aid to India. Instead, Churchill trumpeted that “the famine was their own fault for breeding like rabbits.” Churchill intentionally hoarded grain to sell for profit on the open market after the Second World War instead of diverting it to starving inhabitants of a nation controlled by Britain. Churchill’s actions in India unquestionably constituted a crime against humanity.
...Churchill shared far more ideologically in common with Hitler than most British historians care to admit. For instance, Churchill was a keen supporter of eugenics, something he shared in common with Germany’s Nazi leadership, who were estimated estimated to have killed 200,000 disabled people and forcibly sterilised twice that number. Churchill drafted a highly controversial piece of legislation, which mandated that the mentally ill be forcibly sterilized. In a memo to the Prime Minister in 1910, Winston Churchill cautioned, “the multiplication of the feeble-minded is a very terrible danger to the race”. He also helped organise the International Eugenics Conference of 1912, which was the largest meeting of proponents of eugenics in history.
Churchill had a long standing belief in racial hierarchies and eugenics. In Churchill’s view, white protestant Christians were at the very top of the pyramid, above white Catholics, while Jews and Indians were only slightly higher than Africans.
[source : Winston Churchill: Britain’s “Greatest Briton” Left a Legacy of Global Conflict and Crimes Against Humanity, Global Research, http://www.globalresearch.ca/winston-churchill-britains-greatest-briton-left-a-legacy-of-global-conflict-and-crimes-against-humanity/5503018, 23rd January 2016]
No wonder PJW quoted Churchill!!
THE ULTIMATE SMARTPHONE EXPERIENCE
Just before a lecture yesterday, I popped into the toilet for a quick jimmy riddle. A few seconds later a student walks in, reading and skimming his smartphone, but while he had his jimmy riddle he continued reading and skimming his smartphone! And because he had only used one hand throughout his jimmy riddle, he only washed that one hand afterwards, and did so while reading and skimming his smartphone!
Tuesday, January 26, 2016
WE'RE GOING TO WALK THROUGH THE ENEMY LINES
This was the absolute genius idea of Douglas Haig during WW1: walk through the enemy lines.
I would definitely urge you all to watch Oh What a Lovely War over and over again. We owe it to our ancestors, after what they went through.
One of the great things that Oh What a Lovely War does is expose the class system during WW1: that before WW1, the working class was considered trash, but after Freemasonry had assassinated Ferdinand then it was all about King and Country.
This is precisely the mentality of The Bolton Monarchy: you are expected to sacrifce yourself for the Bolton Monarchy while they fuck and brew their lethal, addictive potions to hypnotise the masses.
So I have one suggestion for The Bolton Monarchy: I am perfectly happy to continue to refer to you as The Bolton Monarcnhy while you and your friends and family treat me like I am a piece of shit willing to lay down my life for you just because you are The Bolton Monarchy!!
So the deal is this: destroy those reports (I have given you ideas) and I will move on; or ignore me and I shall continue this until my dying day.
I am not having you lot treating me like I am a piece of shit!!! Like I am your cannon fodder.
Who the fuck do you lot think you are?!?!?!?!?!? The Buckingham Palace monarchy?
Just because you fuck around, you expect us to love you and buy your lethal, addictive potions and sacrifice our lives for you?
Who the fuck do you are?!?!?!?!?!?
I would definitely urge you all to watch Oh What a Lovely War over and over again. We owe it to our ancestors, after what they went through.
One of the great things that Oh What a Lovely War does is expose the class system during WW1: that before WW1, the working class was considered trash, but after Freemasonry had assassinated Ferdinand then it was all about King and Country.
This is precisely the mentality of The Bolton Monarchy: you are expected to sacrifce yourself for the Bolton Monarchy while they fuck and brew their lethal, addictive potions to hypnotise the masses.
So I have one suggestion for The Bolton Monarchy: I am perfectly happy to continue to refer to you as The Bolton Monarcnhy while you and your friends and family treat me like I am a piece of shit willing to lay down my life for you just because you are The Bolton Monarchy!!
So the deal is this: destroy those reports (I have given you ideas) and I will move on; or ignore me and I shall continue this until my dying day.
I am not having you lot treating me like I am a piece of shit!!! Like I am your cannon fodder.
Who the fuck do you lot think you are?!?!?!?!?!? The Buckingham Palace monarchy?
Just because you fuck around, you expect us to love you and buy your lethal, addictive potions and sacrifice our lives for you?
Who the fuck do you are?!?!?!?!?!?
DOES DAVID ICKE HAVE ANOTHER BOOK TO FLOG?
It looks like it.
Two decades or so ago Alex Jones called David Icke "the turd in the punch bowl".
Yet today I have posted a video of Icke on Jones' radio show discussing the migrant wave into Europe and its consquences, one of which is world government.
My point is this: who else has flogged one their books through someone who decades earlier had called them the "turd in the punch bowl"?
And not only that, but Icke flogs this idea of Rothschild Zionism. But what do we know? Jones is on Youtube proudly announcing his support for the Jewish State of Israel, i.e. Rothschild Zionism!
And not only that, I called for a protest outside Freemasons Hall on 28th June 2014. This was to protest the Freemasonic/British royalty engineering of WW1. On the day, guess who turned up? Yaarrp. Only me. Icke was AWOL, even though just one week before he had proclaimed that the Freemasons were trying to kill him and had threatened him.
And not only that, I had stated on this blog that I had donated £ 500 to his cause.
So when I see Icke flogging his book on the show of Alex Jones, who decades earlier had called Icke, "the turd in the punch bowl", I wah wah wah wah wonder: WTF is going on?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?
I understand that Jones has to flog so many products in whatever way he can in order to keep his (or his masters') and his employees, i.e. PJW, very dodgy and fascistic version of history and economics alive.
But Icke?
He is what got me started in all this!!!
To see him flog his latest book on Jones' channel makes me a little bit sick.
If he is that desperate for money then it suggests to me that he has nothing to lose but join me by taking out a loan and refuse to pay it back to see how the banks react.
What?
You mean, he has too much to lose...
THE FUCKING SELL OUT!!!
Two decades or so ago Alex Jones called David Icke "the turd in the punch bowl".
Yet today I have posted a video of Icke on Jones' radio show discussing the migrant wave into Europe and its consquences, one of which is world government.
My point is this: who else has flogged one their books through someone who decades earlier had called them the "turd in the punch bowl"?
And not only that, but Icke flogs this idea of Rothschild Zionism. But what do we know? Jones is on Youtube proudly announcing his support for the Jewish State of Israel, i.e. Rothschild Zionism!
And not only that, I called for a protest outside Freemasons Hall on 28th June 2014. This was to protest the Freemasonic/British royalty engineering of WW1. On the day, guess who turned up? Yaarrp. Only me. Icke was AWOL, even though just one week before he had proclaimed that the Freemasons were trying to kill him and had threatened him.
And not only that, I had stated on this blog that I had donated £ 500 to his cause.
So when I see Icke flogging his book on the show of Alex Jones, who decades earlier had called Icke, "the turd in the punch bowl", I wah wah wah wah wonder: WTF is going on?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?
I understand that Jones has to flog so many products in whatever way he can in order to keep his (or his masters') and his employees, i.e. PJW, very dodgy and fascistic version of history and economics alive.
But Icke?
He is what got me started in all this!!!
To see him flog his latest book on Jones' channel makes me a little bit sick.
If he is that desperate for money then it suggests to me that he has nothing to lose but join me by taking out a loan and refuse to pay it back to see how the banks react.
What?
You mean, he has too much to lose...
THE FUCKING SELL OUT!!!
Monday, January 25, 2016
ICKE AND JONES TALK ABOUT ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT
I just watched this:
David Icke talks to Alex Jones and Exposes Secret Of The Migrant Wave
Apparently, the migrant wave was all planned years ago, and it is designed to implement world government.
But the migrant wave is due to the war in Syria, which should have been over years ago. That's why they ran the false flag in August 2013, and have been forced to implement a US DIA plan proposed in 2012 in order to create Daesh. This was done because they are years behind in their plans, particularly regarding Syria. This suggests to me that this migrant wave was not planned at all, but is in fact a consequence of them being years behind. I thus consider that Icke and Jones are scaremongering, creating fear that the elite are still in total control when in fact they are losing it...badly!
Another suggestion made in the video is that the migrant wave is to break down borders and minimise patriotism.
If so, then what about this: border patrols are back, fences are going up, nationalism is on the rise, internal border checks could be re-introduced and Schengen is doomed.
This migrant wave is, currently at least, having the opposite effect of bringing us all together: natiionalism, racism and fascism are on the rise; internal borders are going up, even if it is just a metal fence.
And one last thing: Icke is always banging on about us being all one conciousness, from the tiniest plankton to the mightiest elephant. If so, then what is wrong with us mixing a little? Perhaps this mixing could bring us all together?
Not that I support the rapes and the gropes. Any9one found guilty should be processed under the laws of the nation where such crimes are committed.
But what about the bankers?
Perhaps there is an opportunity here, for us all to understand that we are indeed all one, all being manipulated by a bunch of fucked-up warmongering paedos. I'll agree with Jones: they are scared.
And now with this migrant wave, there are more of us to control...in Europe anyway. It is harder to control more people...
So my advice is: stop the fearmongering. This migrant wave was not planned at all. This migrant wave is due to the war in Syria going on for far too long, which suggests to me that they are not in total control at all.
In my opinion they are losing control, they know it, and that is why they are scared.
David Icke talks to Alex Jones and Exposes Secret Of The Migrant Wave
Apparently, the migrant wave was all planned years ago, and it is designed to implement world government.
But the migrant wave is due to the war in Syria, which should have been over years ago. That's why they ran the false flag in August 2013, and have been forced to implement a US DIA plan proposed in 2012 in order to create Daesh. This was done because they are years behind in their plans, particularly regarding Syria. This suggests to me that this migrant wave was not planned at all, but is in fact a consequence of them being years behind. I thus consider that Icke and Jones are scaremongering, creating fear that the elite are still in total control when in fact they are losing it...badly!
Another suggestion made in the video is that the migrant wave is to break down borders and minimise patriotism.
If so, then what about this: border patrols are back, fences are going up, nationalism is on the rise, internal border checks could be re-introduced and Schengen is doomed.
Schengen kaput? 'Possibility exists' EU to change internal border controls https://t.co/cXYRwccl6X pic.twitter.com/y29UMdc8xa
— RT (@RT_com) January 25, 2016This migrant wave is, currently at least, having the opposite effect of bringing us all together: natiionalism, racism and fascism are on the rise; internal borders are going up, even if it is just a metal fence.
And one last thing: Icke is always banging on about us being all one conciousness, from the tiniest plankton to the mightiest elephant. If so, then what is wrong with us mixing a little? Perhaps this mixing could bring us all together?
Not that I support the rapes and the gropes. Any9one found guilty should be processed under the laws of the nation where such crimes are committed.
But what about the bankers?
Perhaps there is an opportunity here, for us all to understand that we are indeed all one, all being manipulated by a bunch of fucked-up warmongering paedos. I'll agree with Jones: they are scared.
And now with this migrant wave, there are more of us to control...in Europe anyway. It is harder to control more people...
So my advice is: stop the fearmongering. This migrant wave was not planned at all. This migrant wave is due to the war in Syria going on for far too long, which suggests to me that they are not in total control at all.
In my opinion they are losing control, they know it, and that is why they are scared.
H M TREASURY DOES NOT KNOW WHAT TAX RATE IS FOR GOOGLE
The Osborne-Schmidt-Bilderberg link needs to be investigated over this tax farce.
Get Osborne in the dock...NOW!!
Get Osborne in the dock...NOW!!
Treasury minister admits the government has NO IDEA what Google's effective tax rate is
https://t.co/mo71weRSl5 pic.twitter.com/N6ML4YB2J6
— Mirror Politics (@MirrorPolitics) January 25, 2016BRITISH CORRUPTION
The big cheese at Google, Eric Schmidt, and the big cheese in HM Treasury, George Osborne, met several times in the last decade at the super-secretive Bilderberg meetings. Over the weekend it was announced to great fanfare that Google would pay a fraction of what they really owe in tax. Osborne proclaimed this a triumph! Google was founded with CIA/NSA seed money and is thus working to enslave us all through providing technological services, such as their search engine (which is used to discover what we are thinking from our queries, and can control human awareness by censoring the responses to our queries) all the way through to driverless cars.
Today, the Atlantic Council Non-resident Senior Fellow, Eliot Higgins, has tweeted this:
But does this Google deal not stink to high heaven of corruption?
And it is happening here, in Great Britain.
Today, the Atlantic Council Non-resident Senior Fellow, Eliot Higgins, has tweeted this:
We're aiming to get involved with more Ukrainian anti-corruption investigative journalism like this in the future https://t.co/fIMBlzJBDC
— Eliot Higgins (@EliotHiggins) January 24, 2016But does this Google deal not stink to high heaven of corruption?
And it is happening here, in Great Britain.
Saturday, January 23, 2016
SURPRISE! USA TO INVADE AND PUT BOOTS ON THE GROUND IN LIBYA, SYRIA AND IRAQ ALLEGEDLY TO DESTROY THEIR BASTARD DAESH
In 2012 the US DIA proposed a dastardly plan to isolate President Bashar al Assad of Syria: to facilitate the rise of a Salafist entity. This was after the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia agreed in early 2007 that the latter would unleash the worst international cutthroat Jihadis onto Syria, Lebanon and Iran.
That Salafist entity we know as Daesh.
Recall that Libya, Syria and Iraq were named to General Wesley Clark shortly after 9/11 as targets for war and regime change.
Do you think the USA and Turkey will withdraw from any ground they liberate from Daesh in Syria or Iraq?
Nah. Me neither.
Same goes for Libya.
That Salafist entity we know as Daesh.
Recall that Libya, Syria and Iraq were named to General Wesley Clark shortly after 9/11 as targets for war and regime change.
#US, #Turkey are ready for #military solution’ in #Syria if #peace talks fail https://t.co/GONuaUMavt pic.twitter.com/BTlWRsh3Ob
— Sputnik (@SputnikInt) January 23, 2016
Do you think the USA and Turkey will withdraw from any ground they liberate from Daesh in Syria or Iraq?
Nah. Me neither.
US considering '#military action' in #Libya to 'save' Africa from #Daesh https://t.co/H9QGA8IvqY #LibyaCrisis pic.twitter.com/QFLB16zMGl
— Sputnik (@SputnikInt) January 23, 2016
Same goes for Libya.
WHAT ELSE DOES GOOGLE OWE?
Our beloved pro-fascist NATO-controlled media is very happy to tell us that Google is paying back tax of £ 130 million.
But how much a fraction is this of what they really owe?
And what are the details of this deal?
Eric Schmidt, the CEO and Chairman of Google, has attended Bilderberg every year since 2008 except for 2009 and 2012. Curiously, he would have met George Osborne there a few times!
Google was created with CIA/NSA money, is a tool of the insidious US intelligence apparatus, and is trying to worm its way into every facet of our lives, to spy on and control us, from discovering what we are interested in and censoring information through their search engine, to developing driverless cars.
Naughty, naughty Google.
But how much a fraction is this of what they really owe?
And what are the details of this deal?
Eric Schmidt, the CEO and Chairman of Google, has attended Bilderberg every year since 2008 except for 2009 and 2012. Curiously, he would have met George Osborne there a few times!
Google was created with CIA/NSA money, is a tool of the insidious US intelligence apparatus, and is trying to worm its way into every facet of our lives, to spy on and control us, from discovering what we are interested in and censoring information through their search engine, to developing driverless cars.
Naughty, naughty Google.
THE SOURCE OF TRUMPETY TRUMP'S APPARENT RACISM
The Real Donald Trumpety Trump has made some outrageous remarks which suggest he is a racist. Not a card-carrying member of the KKK, but a racist nonetheless. The two most outrageous remarks were:
1. deporting Mexicans in the USA back to Mexico and then forcing Mexico to build a wall along the USA-Mexico border similar to that which his beloved Israel has built to keep the Palestinians out of Israel:
2. banning all Muslim immigration (and possibly visits) to the USA.
Earlier this month I posted MEET THE TRUMPETY TRUMPS which gave a brief description of the Trumps and the source of their wealth, which turned out to be the great American industries of brothels, profiteering off WW2 veterans, and racial discrimination.
I recommend that you read this in The Guardian today about the musician Woody Guthrie's experience of being a tenant of Trump after Guthrie had served in the US merchant navy during WW2.
And lest we forget: Trumpety Trump's daddy was somehow arrested during a brawl between the KKK and the police (clue: Trump's daddy was not a cop).
Let's face it: Donald is a rich and privileged white American male, who was 'given' Manhattan, and exhibits some of his father's racism, and also sadly Zionism and fascism.
UPDATE: OMG! I've just realised why Infowars worship Trumpety Trump!
1. deporting Mexicans in the USA back to Mexico and then forcing Mexico to build a wall along the USA-Mexico border similar to that which his beloved Israel has built to keep the Palestinians out of Israel:
2. banning all Muslim immigration (and possibly visits) to the USA.
Earlier this month I posted MEET THE TRUMPETY TRUMPS which gave a brief description of the Trumps and the source of their wealth, which turned out to be the great American industries of brothels, profiteering off WW2 veterans, and racial discrimination.
I recommend that you read this in The Guardian today about the musician Woody Guthrie's experience of being a tenant of Trump after Guthrie had served in the US merchant navy during WW2.
[Fred] Trump would be investigated by a US Senate committee in 1954 for profiteering off of public contracts, not least by overestimating his Beach Haven building charges to the tune of $3.7m.
...In 1979, 12 years after Guthrie had succumbed to the death sentence of Huntington’s Disease, Village Voice reporter Wayne Barrett published a two-part exposé about Fred and Donald Trump’s real estate empire.
Barrett devoted substantial attention to the cases brought against the Trumps in 1973 and 1978 by the Civil Rights Division of the US Justice Department. A major charge was that “racially discriminatory conduct by Trump agents” had “created a substantial impediment to the full enjoyment of equal opportunity”. The most damning evidence had come from Trump’s own employees. As Barrett summarizes:
According to court records, four superintendents or rental agents confirmed that applications sent to the central [Trump] office for acceptance or rejection were coded by race. Three doormen were told to discourage blacks who came seeking apartments when the manager was out, either by claiming no vacancies or hiking up the rents. A super said he was instructed to send black applicants to the central office but to accept white applications on site. Another rental agent said that Fred Trump had instructed him not to rent to blacks. Further, the agent said Trump wanted “to decrease the number of black tenants” already in the development “by encouraging them to locate housing elsewhere.”
And lest we forget: Trumpety Trump's daddy was somehow arrested during a brawl between the KKK and the police (clue: Trump's daddy was not a cop).
Let's face it: Donald is a rich and privileged white American male, who was 'given' Manhattan, and exhibits some of his father's racism, and also sadly Zionism and fascism.
UPDATE: OMG! I've just realised why Infowars worship Trumpety Trump!
A PASSIONATE PLEA TO THE DELIGHTFUL BUT ABOVE ALL HELPFUL BOLTON MONARCHY
Pretty please, with sugar on top: destroy those reports.
If you can't even be arsed to answer a few questions, and continue to treat me like I am a piece of shit while I risk my life and livelihood for you, I think it just good old fashioned courtesy and good manners to acquiesce.
In the meantime, carry on brewing your lethal, addictive potions to hypnotise the masses into believeing that they are powerless so there is no point in doing anything else but guzzle your potions and watch footy!
If you can't even be arsed to answer a few questions, and continue to treat me like I am a piece of shit while I risk my life and livelihood for you, I think it just good old fashioned courtesy and good manners to acquiesce.
In the meantime, carry on brewing your lethal, addictive potions to hypnotise the masses into believeing that they are powerless so there is no point in doing anything else but guzzle your potions and watch footy!
Friday, January 22, 2016
NATO EXPANDS IN UKRAINE
This is just one of the reasons why NATO, contrary to their founding principles, supported neo-Nazis as they first shot protestors and police, then set Kiev on fire, then chased out Yanukovich, then formed a junta run by their man Yats, and then indiscriminately bombed and shelled civilians in East Ukraine protesting against the Nazism of the Nazi junta run by NATO's man Yats.
If they can get Ukraine into NATO (as was agreed at the NATO summit in April 2008) then NATO can plonk first strike nuclear missiles on Russia's doorstep.
If they can get Ukraine into NATO (as was agreed at the NATO summit in April 2008) then NATO can plonk first strike nuclear missiles on Russia's doorstep.
forget the russians NATO has invaded ukraine pic.twitter.com/j0gA3uQNS2
— barry hamill (@baz2000) January 22, 2016Thursday, January 21, 2016
WAS BORIS BEREZOVSKY SMUGGLING NUCLEAR MATERIAL?
Boris Berezovsky was one of those oligarchs who shafted Russia following the fall of the Berlin Wall and then fled Russia to escape the fury of the Russian people. Some fled to Israel, others fled to London. Berezovsky began to finance colour revolutions in former Soviet republics, and threatened a violent revolution in Russia to overthrow Putin. Berezovsky was that powerful that he was basically given one full BBC Question Time to rant about and against Putin.
Berezovsky was found dead in his house in 2013.
There were rumours that Berezovsky was involved in smuggling nuclear material.
In RUSSIA WAS FOLLOWING A NUCLEAR SMUGGLING RING IN LONDON IN 2006 BUT GREAT BRITAIN TOLD RUSSIA IT WAS ALL UNDER CONTROL I quote a cable in which it is claimed that Russia was following a nuclear smuggling ring in London but was told by Great Britain that it was all under control.
But during the search of Berezovsky's house after his death, this happened:
Why would a PED go off, indicating dangerous levels of radiation?
Berezovsky was found dead in his house in 2013.
There were rumours that Berezovsky was involved in smuggling nuclear material.
In RUSSIA WAS FOLLOWING A NUCLEAR SMUGGLING RING IN LONDON IN 2006 BUT GREAT BRITAIN TOLD RUSSIA IT WAS ALL UNDER CONTROL I quote a cable in which it is claimed that Russia was following a nuclear smuggling ring in London but was told by Great Britain that it was all under control.
But during the search of Berezovsky's house after his death, this happened:
Mr Berezovsky was declared dead at the scene by a paramedic. On leaving the premises, the paramedic's personal electronic dosimeter (PED) was triggered. The device measures the air for potentially dangerous levels of radiation.
However, specialist officers who attended the scene subsequently found no trace of radiation of chemical agents and have said there is no health risk.
[source : Boris Berezovsky found dead on bathroom floor behind locked door, The Daily Telegraph, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/russia/9951125/Boris-Berezovsky-found-dead-on-bathroom-floor-behind-locked-door.html, Accessed 2248 GMT 24th March 2013]
Why would a PED go off, indicating dangerous levels of radiation?
RUSSIA WAS FOLLOWING A NUCLEAR SMUGGLING RING IN LONDON IN 2006 BUT GREAT BRITAIN TOLD RUSSIA IT WAS ALL UNDER CONTROL
A cable from 26th December 2006 states:
10. (S) In the course of their exchange, Safonov made the following passing statements:
--Safonov claimed that Russian authorities in London had known about and followed individuals moving radioactive substances into the city but were told by the British that they were under control before the poisoning took place.
[source : US embassy cables: Russian official hints that Russia was not involved in Litvinenko murder, The Guardian, http://www.theguardian.com/world/us-embassy-cables-documents/90864?intcmp=239, 11th December 2010]
THIS PARTICULAR PICTURE PAINTS A THOUSAND WORDS
For nearly 7 years the British government refused to hold an inquiry into the death of Alexander Litvinenko, instead saying that they had the proof that Russia did it but we can't see it.
But then in 2013 the British government suddenly changed its mind, just as Russia began to get involved in Syria.
Much of the 'evidence' presented to the inquiry was presented in secret.
Today the judge leading the inquiry has published his findings, and surprise...he has found that Russia "probably" ordered the assassination of Litvinenko, and that Putin "probably" had some involvement too.
But here is a picture that paints a thousand words:
This is one of the alleged murderers, Andrei Lugovoi, with his family just a few hours after he allegedly murdered Litvinenko with Polonium 210. I ask: if you had administered Polonium 210 to kill someone who was your friend/business partner, would you, covered in this dangerous radioactive substance, go to a football match with your family, thus risking the life of your family?
Lugovoi was asked to become an agent for MI6, but he refused. These allegations against him led to the loss of a multi-million dollar contract.
And the vast majority of Polonium 210 is bought by one nation: the USA.
And then there are the two counsels to the inquiry: Robin Tam was counsel for MI5 and the FCO during the belated inquiry into the death of Diana; and Ben Emmerson is counsel to the Historic Child Abuse Inquiry, and has been criticised by victims.
But if Russia did murder Litvinenko, then why would they?
Litvinenko was a traitor. He worked for another traitor, Boris Berezovsky, and also for MI6 writing anti-Putin propaganda, accusing Putin of being behind 9/11 and all the Islamic terrorism, and calling Putin a peadophile among other things.
But we do have to ask, why did the British government refuse to hold an inquiry into Litvinenko for 7 years, keeping its alleged 'evidence' secret, only deciding to hold an inquiry when Russia began to get involved in Syria? And then when the inquiry gets going, why is much of the evidence is presented in secret?
And why only now, when Russia is annihilating the international cutthroat Jihadis who were unleashed onto Syria by the NATO/Zionist/Gulf states, is it alleged that Putin "probably" murdered Litvinenko?
But then in 2013 the British government suddenly changed its mind, just as Russia began to get involved in Syria.
Much of the 'evidence' presented to the inquiry was presented in secret.
Today the judge leading the inquiry has published his findings, and surprise...he has found that Russia "probably" ordered the assassination of Litvinenko, and that Putin "probably" had some involvement too.
But here is a picture that paints a thousand words:
This is one of the alleged murderers, Andrei Lugovoi, with his family just a few hours after he allegedly murdered Litvinenko with Polonium 210. I ask: if you had administered Polonium 210 to kill someone who was your friend/business partner, would you, covered in this dangerous radioactive substance, go to a football match with your family, thus risking the life of your family?
Lugovoi was asked to become an agent for MI6, but he refused. These allegations against him led to the loss of a multi-million dollar contract.
And the vast majority of Polonium 210 is bought by one nation: the USA.
And then there are the two counsels to the inquiry: Robin Tam was counsel for MI5 and the FCO during the belated inquiry into the death of Diana; and Ben Emmerson is counsel to the Historic Child Abuse Inquiry, and has been criticised by victims.
But if Russia did murder Litvinenko, then why would they?
Litvinenko was a traitor. He worked for another traitor, Boris Berezovsky, and also for MI6 writing anti-Putin propaganda, accusing Putin of being behind 9/11 and all the Islamic terrorism, and calling Putin a peadophile among other things.
But we do have to ask, why did the British government refuse to hold an inquiry into Litvinenko for 7 years, keeping its alleged 'evidence' secret, only deciding to hold an inquiry when Russia began to get involved in Syria? And then when the inquiry gets going, why is much of the evidence is presented in secret?
And why only now, when Russia is annihilating the international cutthroat Jihadis who were unleashed onto Syria by the NATO/Zionist/Gulf states, is it alleged that Putin "probably" murdered Litvinenko?
Wednesday, January 20, 2016
THE TWO GREATEST CRIMES OF THE BRITISH EMPAH
I was stunned to read of the survey which revealed that Brits are proud of their brutal heritage (that they are unaware of). The Independent reported the results of that survey here.
The Independent then came up with five of the worst atrocities carried out by the British Empire (see here).
But the greatest crimes of the British Empah were WW1 and WW2!!
Grand Master of the UGLE, King Edward VII, engineered the alliances that formed during WW1. Following the assassination Arch Duke Ferdinand, King George told Kaiser Wilhelm that he hoped Great Britain would remain neutral, which implied to Kaiser Wilhelm that George and Great Britain would keep out of any war, thus leading to Germany (and other nations) mobilising. But when Germany invaded Belgium, King George ordered British Foreign Secretary Sir Edward Grey to get Great Britain into the war!
So why did Great Britain engineer WW1? The USA, Germany and Russia were adopting The American System of Economics and overtaking Great Britain and its imperialism and slavery as the dominant economic systems, and they were also building land-based railway networks to transport goods beyond the reach and control of the powerful British navy. So Great Britain got them all to fight each other to cause so much bloody carnage and destruction that nations would sacrifice their national sovereignty to a world government to stop such wars occuring again, but also a world government which Great Britain would control. That first attempt at world government was The League of Nations.
But the USA did not join the league, despite Sir Edward Grey advising Woodrow Wilson, because the USA had not suffered that many casualties during WW1, having joined the war in 1917.
So Anglophile Wall Street began to finance both Soviet Russia and Nazi Germany. With these two extreme but opposing ideologies in such close geographical proximity a second world war was very likely. And to drag the USA into the war early on, Winston Churchill withheld information from FDR on the location and target of the Japanese fleet steaming towards Pearl Harbour.
After 6 years of world war, the USA fighting for nearly 4 years, we now have a world government: The United Nations.
The UN is based in the USA.
The UN is pushing all this climate change stuff to control economies, and is supported by a network of the IMF and continental/regional governments.
And who is at the front of the pack demanding that we all reduce our carbon footprint and take one shower a year while he flies to Saudi Arabia to prance around with a sword with the Saudi headchoppers?
Yaarrp. Prince Charles.
QED
WW1 and WW2 are the two greatest crimes of the British Empah.
But the worst is yet to come...
The Independent then came up with five of the worst atrocities carried out by the British Empire (see here).
But the greatest crimes of the British Empah were WW1 and WW2!!
Grand Master of the UGLE, King Edward VII, engineered the alliances that formed during WW1. Following the assassination Arch Duke Ferdinand, King George told Kaiser Wilhelm that he hoped Great Britain would remain neutral, which implied to Kaiser Wilhelm that George and Great Britain would keep out of any war, thus leading to Germany (and other nations) mobilising. But when Germany invaded Belgium, King George ordered British Foreign Secretary Sir Edward Grey to get Great Britain into the war!
So why did Great Britain engineer WW1? The USA, Germany and Russia were adopting The American System of Economics and overtaking Great Britain and its imperialism and slavery as the dominant economic systems, and they were also building land-based railway networks to transport goods beyond the reach and control of the powerful British navy. So Great Britain got them all to fight each other to cause so much bloody carnage and destruction that nations would sacrifice their national sovereignty to a world government to stop such wars occuring again, but also a world government which Great Britain would control. That first attempt at world government was The League of Nations.
But the USA did not join the league, despite Sir Edward Grey advising Woodrow Wilson, because the USA had not suffered that many casualties during WW1, having joined the war in 1917.
So Anglophile Wall Street began to finance both Soviet Russia and Nazi Germany. With these two extreme but opposing ideologies in such close geographical proximity a second world war was very likely. And to drag the USA into the war early on, Winston Churchill withheld information from FDR on the location and target of the Japanese fleet steaming towards Pearl Harbour.
After 6 years of world war, the USA fighting for nearly 4 years, we now have a world government: The United Nations.
The UN is based in the USA.
The UN is pushing all this climate change stuff to control economies, and is supported by a network of the IMF and continental/regional governments.
And who is at the front of the pack demanding that we all reduce our carbon footprint and take one shower a year while he flies to Saudi Arabia to prance around with a sword with the Saudi headchoppers?
Yaarrp. Prince Charles.
QED
WW1 and WW2 are the two greatest crimes of the British Empah.
But the worst is yet to come...
Sunday, January 17, 2016
MUSIC FOR ROBOTS
If you can't feel your feet move to this then you are a soulless robot.
Just as long as your feet do something rhythymic. Legs? Good. Hips? Even gooderer. Arms too? Ace!
We weren't made to be servile to a bunch of artless, warmongering scum. Were we?
FRUIT LOOPS - DANCE.DANCE.DANCE
Just as long as your feet do something rhythymic. Legs? Good. Hips? Even gooderer. Arms too? Ace!
We weren't made to be servile to a bunch of artless, warmongering scum. Were we?
FRUIT LOOPS - DANCE.DANCE.DANCE
Saturday, January 16, 2016
TTS BOOK OF THE DAY
Hitler's Shadow : Nazi War Criminals, U.S. Intelligence, and the Cold War, by Richard Breitman and Norman J.W. Goda
.@MarkSleboda1 @NinaByzantina MI6+Bandera began late 40s
"Nazi War Criminals, U.S. Intelligence, and the Cold War" https://t.co/jEJStTD4y1
— Moon of Alabama (@MoonofA) January 15, 2016DEAREST DEAREST BOLTON MONARCHY
I don't suppose you've made my dreams come true by destroying those reports?
Hmm, honey pie?
Naah. Thought not...
Hmm, honey pie?
Naah. Thought not...
FIRST FEMALE VICE CHANCELLOR OF OXFORD UNIVERSITY ATTACKS BULLINGDON CLUB
I wonder how long she'll be in that position...
Oxford vice-chancellor slams dining club https://t.co/1SyiyPd0mw
— Financial Times (@FT) January 16, 2016FT COVERS UP THE REDIRECTION
The FT has had a stab at covering up The Redirection that Seymour Hersh reported in March 2007.
The FT article actually covers A Clean Break and PNAC, but does not go into too much depth into the links between the two, that PNAC wanted a lot more than just war on Iraq and that 9/11 was the "new Pearl Harbor" that PNAC had proposed in their warmongering document Rebuilding America's Defenses, which occured when senior and founding members of PNAC were in control of the USA and its military on 9/11.
But according to the FT article, there is no conspiracy in Syria!!!
All that violence, hatred, war and headchopping in Syria? To the FT it is just "happenstance", i.e. it just happened!!
THIS IS TOTAL BOLLOCKS!!
For a timeline of the war in Syria see here.
The war in Syria is just one of seven that was planned decades ago and revealed to General Wesley Clark shortly after 9/11. But because by 2007 there had been only 2 wars, the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia agreed that the latter would unleash the worst international cutthroat Jihadis onto Syria, Lebanon and Iran (this is The Redirection), and the US State Dept engineered The Arab Spring to provide these Jihadis with cover as 'freedom fighters'. And because those Jihadis failed to oust Assad, a US DIA plan proposed in 2012 for a Salafist entity to be facilitated in Syria to isolate Assad has been implemented, that entity is Islamic State.
It really is that simple.
Read this shameful attempt at a cover up by the FT:
The FT article actually covers A Clean Break and PNAC, but does not go into too much depth into the links between the two, that PNAC wanted a lot more than just war on Iraq and that 9/11 was the "new Pearl Harbor" that PNAC had proposed in their warmongering document Rebuilding America's Defenses, which occured when senior and founding members of PNAC were in control of the USA and its military on 9/11.
But according to the FT article, there is no conspiracy in Syria!!!
All that violence, hatred, war and headchopping in Syria? To the FT it is just "happenstance", i.e. it just happened!!
THIS IS TOTAL BOLLOCKS!!
For a timeline of the war in Syria see here.
The war in Syria is just one of seven that was planned decades ago and revealed to General Wesley Clark shortly after 9/11. But because by 2007 there had been only 2 wars, the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia agreed that the latter would unleash the worst international cutthroat Jihadis onto Syria, Lebanon and Iran (this is The Redirection), and the US State Dept engineered The Arab Spring to provide these Jihadis with cover as 'freedom fighters'. And because those Jihadis failed to oust Assad, a US DIA plan proposed in 2012 for a Salafist entity to be facilitated in Syria to isolate Assad has been implemented, that entity is Islamic State.
It really is that simple.
Read this shameful attempt at a cover up by the FT:
How the #MiddleEast became a breeding ground for conspiracy theories (free to read)
https://t.co/5p48zORYxc pic.twitter.com/Tao04oTmrC
— Financial Times (@FT) January 16, 2016Friday, January 15, 2016
TRUMPETY TRUMP IS A LITTLE ZIOAMERICAN IMPERIALIST
What was Trumpety Trump's repsonse to Iran capturing American sailors in Iranian waters?
Now imagine if his beloved Israel (does he love Israel more than he doe America?) had captured Iranian sailors in Israeli waters? Israel would have demanded that the USA attack Iran (and if Trumpety Trump were POTUS I think he would)
Iran treated the American sailors very, very well, considering the sailors were found in Iranian waters.
Doesn't he still not know that there is a long term plan for war and regime change in seven countries in five years for the benefit of his beloved Israel, one of those countries being Iran?
Trumpety Trump should have instead asked: WTF were our sailors doing in Iranian waters?
Once again, this suggests that there is an inner imperialist within Trumpety Trump.
So far, under Trumpety Trump the USA would still be a warmongering, fascist nation.
Do you think Iran would have acted so tough if they were Russian sailors? Our country was humiliated.
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) January 14, 2016Now imagine if his beloved Israel (does he love Israel more than he doe America?) had captured Iranian sailors in Israeli waters? Israel would have demanded that the USA attack Iran (and if Trumpety Trump were POTUS I think he would)
Iran treated the American sailors very, very well, considering the sailors were found in Iranian waters.
Doesn't he still not know that there is a long term plan for war and regime change in seven countries in five years for the benefit of his beloved Israel, one of those countries being Iran?
Trumpety Trump should have instead asked: WTF were our sailors doing in Iranian waters?
Once again, this suggests that there is an inner imperialist within Trumpety Trump.
So far, under Trumpety Trump the USA would still be a warmongering, fascist nation.
Thursday, January 14, 2016
NOW THE USA DECLARES WAR ON LATIN AMERICA
Not happy with war in Ukraine, Syria and Iraq, provoking Iran and Russia and China, including staking a claim for the South China Sea, the USA has found a new but familiar enemy: Latin America.
Latin America suffered American imperialism during the 1980's.
But now they're back again, badder and meaner. Ooh rah!!
Latin America suffered American imperialism during the 1980's.
But now they're back again, badder and meaner. Ooh rah!!
#Pentagon calls for “pivot” to target #LatinAmerica - World #Socialist Web Site https://t.co/TFMeasdH7b
— World Socialist WS (@WSWS_Updates) January 13, 2016TRUMPETY TRUMP STILL DANCING AROUND 9/11
First he accused Jeb Bush of 9/11.
Then he stated that thousands of Muslims in New York celebrated 9/11 on the day.
Now Trump has accused Clinton of 9/11.
But when will Trumpety Trump accuse his bestest mate Netanyahu?
Kevin Barrett at Veterans Today has made an analysis of Trumpety Trump's 9/11 accusations and concludes that Trumpety Trump is telling half-truths and avoiding accusing the real culprits, and that if Trumpety Trump does know the truth about 9/11 he is keeping quiet for now to save his life.
I'm not sure about this analysis. I would expect a lot more from Trumpety Trump if he knew. But the election isn't until late this year, so between now and then Trumpety Trump might, just might, start demanding a new inquiry into 9/11...
Then he stated that thousands of Muslims in New York celebrated 9/11 on the day.
Now Trump has accused Clinton of 9/11.
But when will Trumpety Trump accuse his bestest mate Netanyahu?
Kevin Barrett at Veterans Today has made an analysis of Trumpety Trump's 9/11 accusations and concludes that Trumpety Trump is telling half-truths and avoiding accusing the real culprits, and that if Trumpety Trump does know the truth about 9/11 he is keeping quiet for now to save his life.
Trump could be taken out if he told full truth about 9/11 - https://t.co/5ghQzTqBJa pic.twitter.com/pAkx97Saw4
— VeteransTodayNetwork (@veteranstoday) January 13, 2016I'm not sure about this analysis. I would expect a lot more from Trumpety Trump if he knew. But the election isn't until late this year, so between now and then Trumpety Trump might, just might, start demanding a new inquiry into 9/11...
CHINA GIRL WAS NOT ABOUT A CHINA GIRL
Bowie's China Girl was not about a girl from China.
It was about heroin.
And was co-written with Iggy Pop while they were in Berlin.
Here is what they got up to in Berlin:
It was about heroin.
And was co-written with Iggy Pop while they were in Berlin.
Here is what they got up to in Berlin:
Later that year, David packed up and moved to Berlin, later saying: “I needed to completely change my environment and the people I knew.
“I had a small handful of what one might call normal friends. The rest were dealers. It was extremely unhealthy.”
He took Coco and Iggy with him, hoping to help Iggy kick his drug habit, as well as his own. It was a mission doomed to failure, given the propensity of drugs in the city.
Iggy once confided to Rolling Stone that in a typical week, he and David spent two days intoxicated, two days recovering and three days sober.
David later said: “I didn’t have any idea until I got there that Berlin was the smack capital of Europe.”
He finally got properly clean after being awarded custody of his son Zowie in 1980, following his divorce from wife Angie.
He admitted: “I never fully kicked until the mid-Eighties. I’ve an addictive personality, and it took hold of my life.
“I’m ambivalent about it now. It was an extraordinary thing to have to go through. I wouldn’t want to go through it again, but I’m sort of glad I did.”
In his later, sober years, David spent much time and energy helping young people face their drug habits, including Guns N’ Roses guitarist Slash and make-up artist Carolyn Cowan, who he met on a video shoot.
She said: “I’m so grateful for his intervention. David saved my life. He was never judgmental, just kind.”
[source : Even Mick Jagger was worried by how much cocaine David Bowie was doing, The Sun, http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/showbiz/6859685/Mick-Jagger-was-worried-about-how-much-cocaine-David-Bowie-was-doing.html, 14th January 2016]
Wednesday, January 13, 2016
INFOWARS QUOTE CHURCHILL AND THATCHER IN ATTACK ON SOCIALISM
I've seen it all now.
PJW is quoting Churchill and Thatcher to attack socialism!!
And yaarrp. That is the same Churchill who:
1. worked tirelessly to get Great Britain into WW1;
2. fucked up big time during WW1 over the Dardanelles that he was demoted and then resigned;
3. unleashed the Black and Tans onto Ireland;
4. withheld information from FDR on the Japanese fleet steaming towards Pearl Harbour so that the USA could be dragged into WW2 (that's why the official records of this information have been kept secret for 75 years!).
And that is just the tip of the iceberg concerning Churchill: a brutal tool of the British monarchy.
And yaarrp. That is the same Thatcher who:
1. was very good friends with Jimmy Savile;
2. fucked the British coal industry so we now import poor quality coal and get ripped off;
3. liberalised The City of London which contributed to the great financial crash of 2008.
And that is just the tip of the iceberg concerning Thatcher: a brutal tool of the British monarchy.
At about 4:06 into the video PJW discusses Venezuela and its shortage of toilet paper, blaming this on socialism. But what is the real cause of this shortage? CAPITALISM!!
Here is the explanation:
PJW cites China as a good example of capitalism. Yet in the last few years Infowars have been using China as a bad example of capitalism because factory workers are being worked so hard that they would rather throw themselves out of their factory windows and kill themselves (for example, the Apple factory at Shenzen).
Yaarrp. I've seen it all now.
PJW is quoting Churchill and Thatcher to attack socialism!!
And yaarrp. That is the same Churchill who:
1. worked tirelessly to get Great Britain into WW1;
2. fucked up big time during WW1 over the Dardanelles that he was demoted and then resigned;
3. unleashed the Black and Tans onto Ireland;
4. withheld information from FDR on the Japanese fleet steaming towards Pearl Harbour so that the USA could be dragged into WW2 (that's why the official records of this information have been kept secret for 75 years!).
And that is just the tip of the iceberg concerning Churchill: a brutal tool of the British monarchy.
And yaarrp. That is the same Thatcher who:
1. was very good friends with Jimmy Savile;
2. fucked the British coal industry so we now import poor quality coal and get ripped off;
3. liberalised The City of London which contributed to the great financial crash of 2008.
And that is just the tip of the iceberg concerning Thatcher: a brutal tool of the British monarchy.
At about 4:06 into the video PJW discusses Venezuela and its shortage of toilet paper, blaming this on socialism. But what is the real cause of this shortage? CAPITALISM!!
Here is the explanation:
Assume that an importer brings into the country $1mn of toilet paper using official dollars obtained from the government at the preferential rate (toilet paper is an essential that receives preferential dollars and is also highly scarce at its regulated price). Faced with the prospect of selling the good at regulated prices at a maximum 20% nominal profit rate, there are very high incentives for the importer or associated arbitrageurs to re-export the good and resell it abroad.
Let us assume that 50% of the imported good is re-exported under these conditions and resold at the original $500,000 price. If the importer uses those dollars to import Iphones (a good which receives no preferential dollars and is sold at unregulated prices consistent with the parallel market rate in Venezuela), then the importer will be able to capture a handsome 13,400% return and be able to consume the proceeds in Venezuela.
[source : An economist just explained Venezuela's chronic shortage of toilet paper, Business Insider, http://uk.businessinsider.com/why-venezuela-is-running-out-of-toilet-paper-2015-11, 10th November 2015]
PJW cites China as a good example of capitalism. Yet in the last few years Infowars have been using China as a bad example of capitalism because factory workers are being worked so hard that they would rather throw themselves out of their factory windows and kill themselves (for example, the Apple factory at Shenzen).
Yaarrp. I've seen it all now.
TTS DAFT ATLANTIC COUNCIL TWEET OF THE DAY
Eliot Higgins' new employers, The Atlantic Council, which was founded by the same men who created NATO, have tweeted this about General Breedlove's latest comments on Russia:
Former US Ambassador to Ukraine, John Herbst, believes there has been a change in attitudes in aggressive rhetoric towards Russia, that many more now agree with them, but also that the same logic that Russia used to annex Crimea could also be applied to the Baltic states (fear, fear, fear).
The original CS Monitor article dumps all the blame on Russia: Russia invaded Ukraine; Russia started war in Syria. All that kind of stuff, which then apologises for Breedlove's anti-Russia statements.
But under Breedlove, Ukraine was destabilised by a gang of neo-Nazi thugs, who chased out Yanukovich after he had decided to align with Putin. His replacement, Yatsenyuk, was a partner of NATO through his foundation Open Ukraine (and also partners of NED and US Embassy in Kiev), and was handpicked by Victoria Nuland. NATO media portrayed these neo-Nazi thugs as romantic revolutionaries rebelling against a Soviet-style tyranny, when it was they who actually shot dead both protestors and police in Maidan to provoke the violence that ultimately led to Yanukovich fleeing. This was against NATO's founding principles of stabilising Europe and opposition to extreme nationalists. Following this coup, NATO then began to instill fear of Russia taking over the whole of East Europe, when it was NATO who started the destabilisation by supporting the neo-Nazis.
And as for Syria, as shown by Seymour Hersh's article The Redirection, which was published in March 2007, the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia had by 2007 agreed that the latter would unleash the nastiest international cutthroat Jihadis onto Syria, Lebanon and Iran. After nearly 5 years of this covert invasion, Syria was close to defeat, so Assad invited Russia to help him take out the Jihadis. NATO calls this 'Russian aggression'. And in response to Russia's successful rolling back of these Jihadis, what happens? There is a terrorist attack in Paris, which, surprise surprise, was run out of a base just a few miles from NATO HQ (after NATO had run Operation Gladio a few decades ago to terrorise Europe). The Paris attack persuaded an initially sceptical British and French public to bomb Syria.
It's just relentless Atlantic Council bollocks.
.@JohnEdHerbst on why it's time for NATO to start getting tough with Russia: https://t.co/J0xZs8gWgF pic.twitter.com/FL7GXVazsL
— AtlanticCouncil (@AtlanticCouncil) January 13, 2016Former US Ambassador to Ukraine, John Herbst, believes there has been a change in attitudes in aggressive rhetoric towards Russia, that many more now agree with them, but also that the same logic that Russia used to annex Crimea could also be applied to the Baltic states (fear, fear, fear).
The original CS Monitor article dumps all the blame on Russia: Russia invaded Ukraine; Russia started war in Syria. All that kind of stuff, which then apologises for Breedlove's anti-Russia statements.
But under Breedlove, Ukraine was destabilised by a gang of neo-Nazi thugs, who chased out Yanukovich after he had decided to align with Putin. His replacement, Yatsenyuk, was a partner of NATO through his foundation Open Ukraine (and also partners of NED and US Embassy in Kiev), and was handpicked by Victoria Nuland. NATO media portrayed these neo-Nazi thugs as romantic revolutionaries rebelling against a Soviet-style tyranny, when it was they who actually shot dead both protestors and police in Maidan to provoke the violence that ultimately led to Yanukovich fleeing. This was against NATO's founding principles of stabilising Europe and opposition to extreme nationalists. Following this coup, NATO then began to instill fear of Russia taking over the whole of East Europe, when it was NATO who started the destabilisation by supporting the neo-Nazis.
And as for Syria, as shown by Seymour Hersh's article The Redirection, which was published in March 2007, the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia had by 2007 agreed that the latter would unleash the nastiest international cutthroat Jihadis onto Syria, Lebanon and Iran. After nearly 5 years of this covert invasion, Syria was close to defeat, so Assad invited Russia to help him take out the Jihadis. NATO calls this 'Russian aggression'. And in response to Russia's successful rolling back of these Jihadis, what happens? There is a terrorist attack in Paris, which, surprise surprise, was run out of a base just a few miles from NATO HQ (after NATO had run Operation Gladio a few decades ago to terrorise Europe). The Paris attack persuaded an initially sceptical British and French public to bomb Syria.
It's just relentless Atlantic Council bollocks.
TTS THOUGHT FOR T'DAY ON WAKING PEOPLE UP
If you claim to be 'waking people up', and making a living out of it (and in some cases a very nice living, thank you very much), then you have a responsibility to be waking people up with the truth.
The big problem is that there seems to be multiple truths, when there is only one truth.
The big problem is that there seems to be multiple truths, when there is only one truth.
Tuesday, January 12, 2016
WHAT DOES WRITING AND SINGING A SONG ACTUALLY DO?
It can inspire.
Or provide energy.
But what does writing and singing a song actually do?
David Bowie at Live Aid 1985:
Remember, this bastard, fucked up on cocaine, praised Hitler and demanded an extreme fascist government in the UK!!
After our fathers and grandfathers sacrificed their lives so that we wouldn't live under fascism (even though we do!!)
FUCK THAT SHIT!!!
Or provide energy.
But what does writing and singing a song actually do?
David Bowie at Live Aid 1985:
Remember, this bastard, fucked up on cocaine, praised Hitler and demanded an extreme fascist government in the UK!!
After our fathers and grandfathers sacrificed their lives so that we wouldn't live under fascism (even though we do!!)
FUCK THAT SHIT!!!
FARCE : WHAT WAS NIGEL FARAGE DOING FRONTING HAIRCUT 100?
Check it out for yourself!
Are Nick Heywood and Nigel "I claimed someone tried to assassinate me but it was actually a load of bollox" Farage actually the same person?
The question is: did Nick/Nigel go "off to the right"?
Are Nick Heywood and Nigel "I claimed someone tried to assassinate me but it was actually a load of bollox" Farage actually the same person?
I went off to the right
Without saying good goodbye
Where does it go from here?
Is it down to the lake I fear?
Ay ay ay ay ay ah
Ay ay ay ay ay ah...
The question is: did Nick/Nigel go "off to the right"?
BOWIE'S FAILED ATTEMPT AT REDEMPTION
During the mid-1970s David Bowie made some outrageous statements, praising Hitler and calling for an extreme fascist dictatorship in the UK. It has been suggested in DID BOWIE SEEK REDEMPTION FOR HIS NASTY NAZISM? that Bowie showed some remorse for his pro-Nazi statements in his song Word on a Wing and sought some kind of redemption.
I now present to you one of the cheeziest Christmas duets: Bowie and Bing Crosby singing The Little Drummer Boy in 1977...one year after his famous Thin White Duke alter ego and the quasi-fascist Station to Station album.
Did Bowie deserve redemption for his pro-Hitler/fascist statements?
Let's see:
1. Ashes to Ashes;
2. Fashion;
3. Under Pressure;
4. China Girl;
5. Dancing in the Street.
He did not feature in Let Them Know It's Christmas in 1984, but did appear in Live Aid 1985, but did not appear in the Free Nelson Mandela concert in 1988 (though many who appeared in Live Aid in 1985 did).
If I was god I would recognise his attempt at redemption...but I could not redeem him.
Why?
Because in a cocaine-induced psychosis he praised Hitler and demanded an extreme fascist dictatorship in the UK!!!
FUCK THAT!!
It is one thing to take cocaine in small doses and/or recreationally, i.e. in clubs, but it is totally another thing to sniff all the cocaine in the universe, believing in your invincibility due to your fame from writing pro-homosexual songs, and then demand praise Hitler and demand fascism!!
A FUCKING MASSIVE FAIL!!
It really is that simple.
I now present to you one of the cheeziest Christmas duets: Bowie and Bing Crosby singing The Little Drummer Boy in 1977...one year after his famous Thin White Duke alter ego and the quasi-fascist Station to Station album.
Did Bowie deserve redemption for his pro-Hitler/fascist statements?
Let's see:
1. Ashes to Ashes;
2. Fashion;
3. Under Pressure;
4. China Girl;
5. Dancing in the Street.
He did not feature in Let Them Know It's Christmas in 1984, but did appear in Live Aid 1985, but did not appear in the Free Nelson Mandela concert in 1988 (though many who appeared in Live Aid in 1985 did).
If I was god I would recognise his attempt at redemption...but I could not redeem him.
Why?
Because in a cocaine-induced psychosis he praised Hitler and demanded an extreme fascist dictatorship in the UK!!!
FUCK THAT!!
It is one thing to take cocaine in small doses and/or recreationally, i.e. in clubs, but it is totally another thing to sniff all the cocaine in the universe, believing in your invincibility due to your fame from writing pro-homosexual songs, and then demand praise Hitler and demand fascism!!
A FUCKING MASSIVE FAIL!!
It really is that simple.
THERE IS ONLY ONE TRUTH
Lest we forget: there is only one truth.
There are many charlatans and snake oil salesmen/women and straight up propagandists, all telling us the 'truth', flogging this book flogging that health product; flogging the other DVD.
But there is one teeny, weeny problem: there is only one truth.
Thus they don't agree!!
Not 100% anyway.
One of the things they all seem to agree on is that, currently, money is created out of nothing by privately-owned banks. But despite all of them telling us this, what are they actually doing to stop this? Tell you and expect you to take all the risks in stopping this nefarious practice? Are they members of Positive Money, or similar?
There is only one truth.
Yet they all disagree...except on one thing: money!
It is my thinking that if we can get this sorted out then everything else will fall into place...
There are many charlatans and snake oil salesmen/women and straight up propagandists, all telling us the 'truth', flogging this book flogging that health product; flogging the other DVD.
But there is one teeny, weeny problem: there is only one truth.
Thus they don't agree!!
Not 100% anyway.
One of the things they all seem to agree on is that, currently, money is created out of nothing by privately-owned banks. But despite all of them telling us this, what are they actually doing to stop this? Tell you and expect you to take all the risks in stopping this nefarious practice? Are they members of Positive Money, or similar?
There is only one truth.
Yet they all disagree...except on one thing: money!
It is my thinking that if we can get this sorted out then everything else will fall into place...
DID BOWIE SEEK REDEMPTION FOR HIS NASTY NAZISM?
I was just going to write about Bowie's Starman, when I decided to look at what other people thought were his best songs.
One writer has stated this:
In the mid-1970s, Bowie, and Eric Clapton, came out with some racist, fascist statements which eventually led to the creation of the Rock Against Racism movement. We are expected to dismiss these statements, attributing them to their excessive cocaine abuse.
But I again ask: why are the deaths of Lemmy and Bowie covered so much by the warmongering mainstream media when there is barely a whisper of the death of John Bradbury?
Anyway, what do Starman lyrics suggest to you?
To me they suggest that we should just have a good time.
Let all the children boogie, he says.
But what about finding out who engineered WW1 and WW2, and why?
Why ignore all that history?
This is the same message that Lemmy had: just get fucked, man, drink, shag (and collect Nazi paraphernalia).
I have to say that there appears to be some change in Bowie's music and philosophy after his flirt with Nazism. But can he ever be forgiven for praising Hitler and demanding an extreme fascist government in Great Britain, just because his 'brain' was totally fucked up from outrageously excsessive cocaine abuse? In my eyes: NO FUCKING WAY!
My grandfathers landed on the beaches of Normandy in June 1944 because The Shitty of London had created Hitler and the Nazis for a second world war. Bowie knew nothing of this, and showed no interest either.
One writer has stated this:
Blackstar isn’t the first album Bowie made at death’s door. When he made Station to Station he was paranoid and malnourished, strung out on coke and black magic. The album bristles with fascist and diabolic imagery and yet there in the middle of side two comes this breathless, passionate, theologically very straightforward hymn: “Lord I kneel and over you my word on a wing, I’m trying hard to fit into your scheme of things.” I wasn’t surprised years later to discover that the title was nothing to do with trains but with the Stations of the Cross. I know nothing of Bowie’s religious beliefs but this grasp at redemption has often fed my own. At the height of the icy, controlling Thin White Duke period, he makes himself vulnerable and weak and invites grace in. It’s a personal Passion. It’s also incredibly beautiful.
[source : Frank Cottrell, My favourite Bowie song – by Florence, Marianne Faithfull, Julien Temple, Noel Fielding and more, The Guardian, http://www.theguardian.com/music/musicblog/2016/jan/12/my-favourite-bowie-song-florence-welch-marianne-faithfull-corey-taylor-matty-healy-and-more, 12th January 2016]
In the mid-1970s, Bowie, and Eric Clapton, came out with some racist, fascist statements which eventually led to the creation of the Rock Against Racism movement. We are expected to dismiss these statements, attributing them to their excessive cocaine abuse.
But I again ask: why are the deaths of Lemmy and Bowie covered so much by the warmongering mainstream media when there is barely a whisper of the death of John Bradbury?
Anyway, what do Starman lyrics suggest to you?
Didn't know what time it was and the lights were low
I leaned back on my radio
Some cat was layin' down some rock 'n' roll 'lotta soul,
he said
Then the loud sound did seem to fade
Came back like a slow voice on a wave of phase
That weren't no D.J. that was hazy cosmic jive
[CHORUS]
There's a starman waiting in the sky
He'd like to come and meet us
But he thinks he'd blow our minds
There's a starman waiting in the sky
He's told us not to blow it
Cause he knows it's all worthwhile
He told me:
Let the children lose it
Let the children use it
Let all the children boogie
I had to phone someone so I picked on you
Hey, that's far out so you heard him too!
Switch on the TV
we may pick him up on channel two
Look out your window I can see his light
If we can sparkle he may land tonight
Don't tell your poppa or he'll get us locked up in fright
[CHORUS (x2)]
La, la, la, la, la, la, la, la
To me they suggest that we should just have a good time.
Let all the children boogie, he says.
But what about finding out who engineered WW1 and WW2, and why?
Why ignore all that history?
This is the same message that Lemmy had: just get fucked, man, drink, shag (and collect Nazi paraphernalia).
I have to say that there appears to be some change in Bowie's music and philosophy after his flirt with Nazism. But can he ever be forgiven for praising Hitler and demanding an extreme fascist government in Great Britain, just because his 'brain' was totally fucked up from outrageously excsessive cocaine abuse? In my eyes: NO FUCKING WAY!
My grandfathers landed on the beaches of Normandy in June 1944 because The Shitty of London had created Hitler and the Nazis for a second world war. Bowie knew nothing of this, and showed no interest either.
REMEMBER WHEN PUTIN WAS THE DEVIL?
I remember a time when particular news outlets were calling out Putin as the Devil, twisting everything he said and did into evidence to support such claims. One such piece of evidence was a photo of Putin with the King of Jordan, and Putin had his right hand in his suit, which some interpreted as a sign of the devil.
But now Putin has overtly called out the global elite and has issued a challenge to them.
This is in addition to destroying the international cutthroat Jihadis that the global elite unleashed onto Syria.
But now Putin has overtly called out the global elite and has issued a challenge to them.
A report prepared by the Security Council (SCRF) circulating in the Kremlin today states that President Putin has issued orders that his people must be protected from GMO “food” and Western pharmaceuticals “at all costs.”
The report says that President Putin believes the next stage of human evolution is currently in “grave risk” and that Western and global powers are “intentionally decelerating the process for their personal gain.”
“We as a species have the choice to continue to develop our bodies and brains in a healthy upward trajectory, or we can follow the Western example of recent decades and intentionally poison our population with genetically altered food, pharmaceuticals, vaccinations, and fast food that should be classified as a dangerous, addictive drug.”
“We must fight this. A physically and intellectually disabled population is not in our interests,” the report states.
[source : Putin: Human Evolution Under Threat By Big Pharma, GMO, Vaccines, Your News Wire, http://yournewswire.com/putin-human-evolution-under-threat-by-big-pharma-gmo-vaccines/, 12th January 2016]
This is in addition to destroying the international cutthroat Jihadis that the global elite unleashed onto Syria.
IS STEFAN MOLYNUEX A GATEKEEPER?
I referred to Stefan Molyneux a few days ago after watching a video he had posted on the Israel-Paleestine conflict which though pro-Palestine protected the Rothschilds and the Frankist/Sabbatean religion.
PJW has today stated that he is to appear on Molyneux's show next month.
But what does Molyneux believe about 9/11?
He believes that the US Government probably didn't do it (see opening comments in the video below).
WHAT A RAMBLE!!
However, this video was published 7 years ago, so Molyneux could have changed his mind since then (but if he has I can't find it!)
But a good analysis of what Molyneux thought at the time can be found here.
PJW has today stated that he is to appear on Molyneux's show next month.
But what does Molyneux believe about 9/11?
He believes that the US Government probably didn't do it (see opening comments in the video below).
WHAT A RAMBLE!!
However, this video was published 7 years ago, so Molyneux could have changed his mind since then (but if he has I can't find it!)
But a good analysis of what Molyneux thought at the time can be found here.
STOP THE NONSENSE
The Stop The War Coalition have indicated their appreciation of David Bowie, making his I'd Rather be High their Song of the Week.
But what did Bowie do when he was high, i.e. totally fucked up from excessive cocaine use?
He praised Hitler and demanded extreme right wing fascist governments for both the UK and USA!
Stop the War shoud stop this nonsense and ask:
1. why are Lemmy and Bowie being so worshipped by a mainstream media that demands war;
2. when Lemmy was a definite closet Nazi and Bowie could have been one but his pro-Hitler/fascist statements could be attributed to him being totally fucked up from excessive cocaine use.
GET A GRIP!
And while they're at it, they should also ask who engineered WW1, WW2 and why.
Song of the week | #DavidBowie I'd Rather Be High | A song about a soldier traumatised by war | VIDEO & LYRICS: https://t.co/NGUg3rmI2X
— Stop the War (@STWuk) January 11, 2016But what did Bowie do when he was high, i.e. totally fucked up from excessive cocaine use?
He praised Hitler and demanded extreme right wing fascist governments for both the UK and USA!
Stop the War shoud stop this nonsense and ask:
1. why are Lemmy and Bowie being so worshipped by a mainstream media that demands war;
2. when Lemmy was a definite closet Nazi and Bowie could have been one but his pro-Hitler/fascist statements could be attributed to him being totally fucked up from excessive cocaine use.
GET A GRIP!
And while they're at it, they should also ask who engineered WW1, WW2 and why.
Monday, January 11, 2016
BOWIE FACTCHECK
Just to make sure: Bowie did praise Hitler and demand a fascist government for Great Britain (he must have died with a smile on his face then!), when my grandfathers (and many others) landed on the beaches of Normandy in June 1944, both returning completely destroyed when WW2 ended?
WHY DID BOWIE NOT PLAY AT THE FREE NELSON MANDELA CONCERT BUT DID AT LIVE AID IN 1985?
Another absentee at the Free Nelson Mandela concert in 1988: Motorhead.
Motorhead were also absent from Live Aid 1985.
So the deaths of closet Nazis Lemmy and Bowie are headline news for a day, while the death of John Bradbury, drummer of The Specials, is barely whispered.
Motorhead were also absent from Live Aid 1985.
So the deaths of closet Nazis Lemmy and Bowie are headline news for a day, while the death of John Bradbury, drummer of The Specials, is barely whispered.
EVER WONDERD WHY BOWIE'S SONGS AND LYRICS WERE A BIT QUIRKY?
He used to type stuff into a computer, the computer would randomly make up stuff from that input, and then Bowie would see what he could make of it.
Is that art?
I don't think he came up with all that Nazi/Hitler/fascist stuff using that method.
Is that art?
I don't think he came up with all that Nazi/Hitler/fascist stuff using that method.
SURPRISE! NATO AND REBEL MEDIA USE STARVATION IMAGES FROM ELSEWHERE AND FROM ANOTHER TIME CLAIMING THEY ARE FROM MADAYA
I wonder what else they are faking?
Are the rebels stopping civilians from leaving?
Are the rebels using the civilians as human shields?
Have the rebels confiscated earlier supplies and are now selling them at exorbitant prices?
If they can fake these images then why not?
All this NATO/rebel propaganda is designed to provoke a NATO/Zionist/Gulf state 'humanitarian' intervention...similar to August 2013.
It really is that simple!
Are the rebels stopping civilians from leaving?
Are the rebels using the civilians as human shields?
Have the rebels confiscated earlier supplies and are now selling them at exorbitant prices?
If they can fake these images then why not?
All this NATO/rebel propaganda is designed to provoke a NATO/Zionist/Gulf state 'humanitarian' intervention...similar to August 2013.
It really is that simple!
EXPLAINING THE REDIRECTION
On 11th September 2001, several passenger planes were allegedly hijacked, and then flown into the WTC and even The Pentagon. This act of terrorism provided the USA with an excuse to go to war on the world. But just a year before, an organisation called The Project for a New American Century had published a document calling for the USA to assert its superpower status and go to war on a several nations, namely Iraq and Iran, but recognised the need for a "new Pearl Harbor" to persuade a sceptical American public to support such wars. PNAC was overtly Zionist and on 9/11 several of its leading founding members were in charge of the suspiciously AWOL US military while President George W Bush was in Flordia reading an upside-down book about a pet goat to some schoolkids. PNAC interconnected with a bunch of Zionists who in 1996 had written A Clean Break for then PM of Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu, which called for 'engagement' of Israel's neighbours: Iraq, Iran, Syria and Lebanon/Hezbollah. Shortly after 9/11 General Wesley Clark was informed of a planned for war and regime change in seven countries in five years. Those seven countries were Iraq, Iran, Syria and Lebanon (named in A Clean Break) together with Libya, Sudan and Somalia.
After a brief diversion into Afghanistan to restore the opium harvests (not find an already dead Osama bin Laden), that plan has been implemented. We went to war on Iraq in 2003 based on a pack of lies, and Israel engineered a war on Lebanon in 2006 (and lost!). So by 2007 that plan was moribund.
To inject some life into that plan, the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia agreed that the latter would unleash the worst international cutthroat Jihadis onto Syria, Lebanon and Iran (named in A Clean Break). This was reported by Seymour Hersh in The Redirection which was published in The New Yorker Magazine in March 2007. However, these Jihadis were first unleashed onto Libya (named to Clark), and were given cover as 'freedom fighters' by the US State Department-engineered Arab Spring. For whatever reason Russia and China abstained on UN SCR 1973, but within days of NATO implementing that resolution there were calls to get Gaddafi. UN SCR was supposed to protect civilians by implementing a No Fly Zone. But the 'civilians' being protected by NATO were actually al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, and they were assisted on the ground by British Special Forces. Eventually, with NATO as their air force, and with advice and assistance from special forces from Great Britain and some Gulf states, as well as their finance, Gaddafi was indeed 'got'.
And after Gaddafi's murder those Jihadis were smuggled into Syria, along with Libya's weapons (including chemcials as reported by the OPCW recently).
But why would the apparent sworn enemies Saudi Arabia and Israel gang up on these nations, to cause all this violence and bloodshed and headchopping?
For some insight, it is useful to understand where these two nations, Israel and Saudi Arabia, come from.
Israel was given to the Zionists during WW1 when Zionists suggested that, as at the time Great Britain was close to defeat in WW1, they could bring the isolationist USA into the war on the side of Great Britain. The payment for this would be Palestine.
A history of the subsequent backstabbing and manipulation by Great Britain over Palestine for the Zionists can be found here, and includes a good description of how and why Saudi Arabia was created.
After a brief diversion into Afghanistan to restore the opium harvests (not find an already dead Osama bin Laden), that plan has been implemented. We went to war on Iraq in 2003 based on a pack of lies, and Israel engineered a war on Lebanon in 2006 (and lost!). So by 2007 that plan was moribund.
To inject some life into that plan, the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia agreed that the latter would unleash the worst international cutthroat Jihadis onto Syria, Lebanon and Iran (named in A Clean Break). This was reported by Seymour Hersh in The Redirection which was published in The New Yorker Magazine in March 2007. However, these Jihadis were first unleashed onto Libya (named to Clark), and were given cover as 'freedom fighters' by the US State Department-engineered Arab Spring. For whatever reason Russia and China abstained on UN SCR 1973, but within days of NATO implementing that resolution there were calls to get Gaddafi. UN SCR was supposed to protect civilians by implementing a No Fly Zone. But the 'civilians' being protected by NATO were actually al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, and they were assisted on the ground by British Special Forces. Eventually, with NATO as their air force, and with advice and assistance from special forces from Great Britain and some Gulf states, as well as their finance, Gaddafi was indeed 'got'.
And after Gaddafi's murder those Jihadis were smuggled into Syria, along with Libya's weapons (including chemcials as reported by the OPCW recently).
But why would the apparent sworn enemies Saudi Arabia and Israel gang up on these nations, to cause all this violence and bloodshed and headchopping?
For some insight, it is useful to understand where these two nations, Israel and Saudi Arabia, come from.
Israel was given to the Zionists during WW1 when Zionists suggested that, as at the time Great Britain was close to defeat in WW1, they could bring the isolationist USA into the war on the side of Great Britain. The payment for this would be Palestine.
A history of the subsequent backstabbing and manipulation by Great Britain over Palestine for the Zionists can be found here, and includes a good description of how and why Saudi Arabia was created.
WHY IS DAVID BOWIE BEING SO WORSHIPPED?
A few weeks ago Lemmy of Motor head died. At the time many celebrities spoke of how great a man Lemmy was: hellraiser, life and soul of the party; spoke his mind. All that kind of stuff was said. But in the subsequent days after his death, among all the tributes I never once heard anyone mention his fascination for Nazi paraphernalia. He tried to dimiss this macabre fascination as one of either just an appreciation of their uniforms, or stating that nobody was less Nazi than him. But I don't collect Nazi paraphernalia. My friends and family don't. Do you? Do your friends and family collect Nazi paraphernalia? Do their friends and family? I posted an interview of Lemmy by John Robb and posted some photos of his collection in WHY DON'T YOU COLLECT NAZI MEMORABILIA? which questioned Lemmy's interest in Nazi paraphernalia, suggesting that it was much, much more than just an appreciation of their uniforms, as shown by the many, many Nazi daggers, swords and flags on his walls (and that was just what we got to see!).
On the same day that Lemmy died, the drummer of The Specials, John Bradbury, also died. As a member of The Specials campaigned to free Nelson Mandela.
But whose death got the vast majority of the coverage?
Yaarrp. Lemmy, the closet Nazi, the bottle-of-Jack-Daniels-a-day, the shagged-1000-women man.
Another musician died today: David Bowie.
My view of Bowie is; good musician but a fucking weirdo and possible tool of the global elite.
I have some appreciation of Bowie's music but not his alter egos.
But I would like to bring your attention to two aspects of Bowie.
First, his questionable sexuality. Just last week, a former landlady of his, with whom he had an affair, wrote in the newspapers that she was surprised when he began to 'confess' to his homo/bisexuality, and she thought it was so fake. So do I. So why would Bowie 'pretend' to be homo/bisexual? Was it fake? Or was he pushing an agenda? Recall that in 1969 Dr Richard Day stated that homo and bisexuality would be pushed as part of the "anything goes" agenda to reduce population.
But I think the second is the most disturbing. This is Bowie speaking during an interview that was published by the NME in August 1975:
And here he is again, this time quoted in Playboy calling for a fascist leader in Great Britain:
Yaarrp. Bowie called for extreme right fascist Government dictatorships in both the UK and USA!!
And that second source, Musician's History, decribes how that quotation from Bowie contributed to the creation of the Rock Against Racism movement.
Now, his apologists dismiss this as due to very excessive cocaine use. Really? Yes. Really. You mean we are supposed to idolise David Bowie who called for extreme fascist governmnents in the UK and USA...but he called for this because he was totally fucked up on cocaine?!
Er, I don't think so.
So let's just recap what has happened in the last few weeks:
1. Lemmy dies, he was praised as a 'hellraiser' but he was actually a closet Nazi (do you collect Nazi daggers and swords and try dismiss this as an appreciation of Nazi uniforms?), and the mainstream media dedicates so much time to his death;
2. David Bowie dies, he was praised as a 'rebel', but he too was a closet Nazi who pushed the bisexual/transgender "anything goes" agenda, and the mainstream media dedicates so much time to his death;
3. John Bradbury dies (the same day as Lemmy), but there is barely a whisper of his death in the mainstream media. Why? Was it because Bradbury had no hint of being a Nazi and had actually campaigned to free Nelson Mandela?
On the same day that Lemmy died, the drummer of The Specials, John Bradbury, also died. As a member of The Specials campaigned to free Nelson Mandela.
But whose death got the vast majority of the coverage?
Yaarrp. Lemmy, the closet Nazi, the bottle-of-Jack-Daniels-a-day, the shagged-1000-women man.
Another musician died today: David Bowie.
My view of Bowie is; good musician but a fucking weirdo and possible tool of the global elite.
I have some appreciation of Bowie's music but not his alter egos.
But I would like to bring your attention to two aspects of Bowie.
First, his questionable sexuality. Just last week, a former landlady of his, with whom he had an affair, wrote in the newspapers that she was surprised when he began to 'confess' to his homo/bisexuality, and she thought it was so fake. So do I. So why would Bowie 'pretend' to be homo/bisexual? Was it fake? Or was he pushing an agenda? Recall that in 1969 Dr Richard Day stated that homo and bisexuality would be pushed as part of the "anything goes" agenda to reduce population.
But I think the second is the most disturbing. This is Bowie speaking during an interview that was published by the NME in August 1975:
"You've got to have an extreme right front come up and sweep everything off its feet and tidy everything up. Then you can get a new form of liberalism.
"There's some form of ghost force liberalism permeating the air in America, but it's got to go, because it's got no foundation at all, apart from a set of laws that were established way back in the bloody '50s and early '60s and have no bearing at all in the '70s. (The Supreme Court in America was at its most liberal in the late '50s, early '60s.)
"So the best thing that can happen is for an extreme right Government to come. It'll do something positive at least to the cause commotion in people and they'll either accept the dictatorship or get rid of it.
[source : Classic David Bowie Interview: Adolf Hitler And The Need For A New Right, The Quietus, http://thequietus.com/articles/03598-david-bowie-nme-interview-about-adolf-hitler-and-new-nazi-rock-movement, 25th January 2010]
And here he is again, this time quoted in Playboy calling for a fascist leader in Great Britain:
Britain is ready for a fascist leader...I think Britain could benefit from a fascist leader. After all, fascism is really nationalism...I believe very strongly in fascism, people have always responded with greater efficiency under a regimental leadership…Adolf Hitler was one of the first rock stars...You’ve got to have an extreme right front come up and sweep everything off its feet and tidy everything up.
[source : The MU’s response to David Bowie’s “Nazi” salute, The Musicians' Union: A Social History, http://www.muhistory.com/from-the-archive-2-mu-response-to-david-bowies-nazi-salute/, 6th October 2012]
Yaarrp. Bowie called for extreme right fascist Government dictatorships in both the UK and USA!!
And that second source, Musician's History, decribes how that quotation from Bowie contributed to the creation of the Rock Against Racism movement.
Now, his apologists dismiss this as due to very excessive cocaine use. Really? Yes. Really. You mean we are supposed to idolise David Bowie who called for extreme fascist governmnents in the UK and USA...but he called for this because he was totally fucked up on cocaine?!
Er, I don't think so.
So let's just recap what has happened in the last few weeks:
1. Lemmy dies, he was praised as a 'hellraiser' but he was actually a closet Nazi (do you collect Nazi daggers and swords and try dismiss this as an appreciation of Nazi uniforms?), and the mainstream media dedicates so much time to his death;
2. David Bowie dies, he was praised as a 'rebel', but he too was a closet Nazi who pushed the bisexual/transgender "anything goes" agenda, and the mainstream media dedicates so much time to his death;
3. John Bradbury dies (the same day as Lemmy), but there is barely a whisper of his death in the mainstream media. Why? Was it because Bradbury had no hint of being a Nazi and had actually campaigned to free Nelson Mandela?
Sunday, January 10, 2016
CONFIRMED : ELIOT HIGGINS IS NO LONGER AN INDEPENDENT JOURNALIST
A few weeks ago he said he was going to be a Fellow at The Atlantic Council, whose founders also founded NATO. The Atlantic Council is run by some of the most satanic, bloodthirsty, callous scum-of-the-earth (e.g. Kissinger (Director), Albright (Honorary Director)).
Now he has confirmed his Fellow status at The Atlantic Council, and thus confirms that he is no longer an independent journalist (if he ever was, considering his knowledge that the rebels in Syria had Sarin, but as with the plan for war and regime change in seven countries in five years, he keeps his mouth shut, collects awards, somehow gets offered a PhD despite not being a graduate (and who is paying the fees and maintenance?) and now is appointed a Fellow at arguably one of the most warmongering think tanks on the planet).
Now he has confirmed his Fellow status at The Atlantic Council, and thus confirms that he is no longer an independent journalist (if he ever was, considering his knowledge that the rebels in Syria had Sarin, but as with the plan for war and regime change in seven countries in five years, he keeps his mouth shut, collects awards, somehow gets offered a PhD despite not being a graduate (and who is paying the fees and maintenance?) and now is appointed a Fellow at arguably one of the most warmongering think tanks on the planet).
Just had my profile added to the Atlantic Council site - Nonresident Senior Fellow for New Information Frontiers . https://t.co/cDx8mqCjFf
— Eliot Higgins (@EliotHiggins) January 10, 2016WHY IS THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA COVERING THE DEATH OF LEMMY SO MUCH?
The lead singer of Motorhead, Lemmy, died on 28th December 2015.
But on the same day the drummer for The Specials, John Bradbury, also died.
Yet Lemmy's death was widely reported by the mainstream media, with many celebrities expressing their sympathies and praising Lemmy, and even Infowars got in on the sycophancy.
Motorhead and Lemmy were known for the song Ace of Spades.
What do these lyrics suggest to you? Lemmy was a 'hellraiser' who not just collected Nazi memorabilia, but was actually proud of his collection of not just uniforms but many, many Nazi daggers, shields, flags and swords (and this was just what we were allowed to see). I ask, why don't you collect Nazi memorabilia?
But what did Bradbury do? As a member of The Specials he campaigned to get Nelson Mandela freed.
So Lemmy the hellraiser with a freaky fascination in the Nazis is headline news, but Bradbury who campaigned to free Nelson Mandela is nowhere.
But on the same day the drummer for The Specials, John Bradbury, also died.
Yet Lemmy's death was widely reported by the mainstream media, with many celebrities expressing their sympathies and praising Lemmy, and even Infowars got in on the sycophancy.
Motorhead and Lemmy were known for the song Ace of Spades.
If you like to gamble, I tell you I'm your man,
You win some, lose some, all the same to me,
The pleasure is to play, makes no difference what you say,
I don't share your greed, the only card I need is
The Ace Of Spades
Playing for the high one, dancing with the devil,
Going with the flow, it's all the game to me,
Seven or Eleven, snake eyes watching you,
Double up or quit, double stake or split,
The Ace Of Spades
You know I'm born to lose, and gambling's for fools,
But that's the way I like it baby,
I don't wanna live for ever,
And don't forget the joker!
Pushing up the ante, I know you wanna see me,
Read 'em and weep, the dead man's hand again,
I see it in your eyes, take one look and die,
The only thing you see, you know it's gonna be,
The Ace Of Spades
What do these lyrics suggest to you? Lemmy was a 'hellraiser' who not just collected Nazi memorabilia, but was actually proud of his collection of not just uniforms but many, many Nazi daggers, shields, flags and swords (and this was just what we were allowed to see). I ask, why don't you collect Nazi memorabilia?
But what did Bradbury do? As a member of The Specials he campaigned to get Nelson Mandela freed.
So Lemmy the hellraiser with a freaky fascination in the Nazis is headline news, but Bradbury who campaigned to free Nelson Mandela is nowhere.
Saturday, January 09, 2016
THE TRUTH ABOUT THE TRUTH ABOUT MONEY
According to Anthony Gucciardi at Infowars, there should be more money in the hands of 'good' people. Yes that it is true. And as an 'entrepreneur' he would like to generate more money for more 'good' people so that he and Alex and everyone else could give more to 'charity'.
Yet it is exactly these kind of people, Alex Jones, Paul Joseph Watson, Anthony Gucciardi, David Icke, Tony Gosling, and all the rest, who know that money is created out of thin air, but all they do is tell you as a side dish in the process of 'waking people up'. At least Max Keiser is trying to introduce an alternative, but he is tied at the brain to Zac Goldsmith, and his idea Bitcoin is actually helping the globalist elite by introducing a viable, functional digital currency!!
WHAT ARE THEY DOING TO PROVE THAT WE OWE NOTHING?!
Yeah, they can tell us some 'truth': shape-shifting reptilians run the planet; Jesus Christ actually existed; President Andrew Jackson was a humanitarian. But in the process flog some stuff and make a living out of conspiracy theories (and in some cases a very nice living).
But what exaxctly are they doing for you?
All the above could join me in trying to prove that we owe nothing to the banks by taking out a loan and refuse to pay it back to see how the banks react. As 'leaders' of the resistance they could encourage many others to do the same. Such a resistance, a non-compliance, could grow...and grow...and grow. As court cases occur, theirs at first, we could learn counter arguments to banks' arguments until the final victory.
Or are they not prepared to take such a risk, to lose all they have...
But no. They all tell you the 'truth', of which there is only one, but they all propagate different truths and make a living out of it.
So, until they all put their money where their mouths are I shall consider them all cowards: happy to flog this and that idea in order to flog this and that product (be it health product or book or video). But to actually do something practical that could help everyone to instaneously become rich by proving that we all owe sweet FA to the banks, but risk everything they own in the process? Fuk dat shit, bro'!
Yet it is exactly these kind of people, Alex Jones, Paul Joseph Watson, Anthony Gucciardi, David Icke, Tony Gosling, and all the rest, who know that money is created out of thin air, but all they do is tell you as a side dish in the process of 'waking people up'. At least Max Keiser is trying to introduce an alternative, but he is tied at the brain to Zac Goldsmith, and his idea Bitcoin is actually helping the globalist elite by introducing a viable, functional digital currency!!
WHAT ARE THEY DOING TO PROVE THAT WE OWE NOTHING?!
Yeah, they can tell us some 'truth': shape-shifting reptilians run the planet; Jesus Christ actually existed; President Andrew Jackson was a humanitarian. But in the process flog some stuff and make a living out of conspiracy theories (and in some cases a very nice living).
But what exaxctly are they doing for you?
All the above could join me in trying to prove that we owe nothing to the banks by taking out a loan and refuse to pay it back to see how the banks react. As 'leaders' of the resistance they could encourage many others to do the same. Such a resistance, a non-compliance, could grow...and grow...and grow. As court cases occur, theirs at first, we could learn counter arguments to banks' arguments until the final victory.
Or are they not prepared to take such a risk, to lose all they have...
But no. They all tell you the 'truth', of which there is only one, but they all propagate different truths and make a living out of it.
So, until they all put their money where their mouths are I shall consider them all cowards: happy to flog this and that idea in order to flog this and that product (be it health product or book or video). But to actually do something practical that could help everyone to instaneously become rich by proving that we all owe sweet FA to the banks, but risk everything they own in the process? Fuk dat shit, bro'!
LETTING THE ZIONISTS OFF THE HOOK
The Real Alex Jones has tweeted this video by Stefan Molyneux.
But who is Molyneux?
I watched another video of his on the Israel-Palestine conflict.
Molyneux does say a lot of truth, more than most, but to me pins Zionism on the rabbis rather than the Rothschilds. Indeed, Molyneux mentions the Rothschilds just once, when he discusses The Balfour Declaration.
According to Molyneux, Zionism began in 1861 when some rabbis decided that Jews could never live with non-Jews so they began to encourage wealthy Jewish bankers to buy Palestine from the Ottomans.
But well before this, Moses Montefiore had decided to dedicate his life and fortune to establishing a Jewish colony in Palestine. And well before this, the founder of the Rothschild banking dynasty, Mayer Amschel, was a follower and financier of Jacob Frank, who claimed that he was the reincarnation of Sabbatai Zevi, who claimed that he was the Messiah returned to lead the Jews back to Palestine. Thus, Frank was implicitly claiming that he was the Messiah. Moses Montefiore and Nathan Mayer Rothschild were brother-in-laws having married two daughters of Levy Barent Cohen.
The Rothschilds financed the first Jewish settlement Rishon-leZion, which Baron Edmond de Rothschild turned into a winery to support the settlement.
But it is how Molyneux avoids discussing the following which raises some doubt about his sincerity:
1. the Nazis and the Zionists collaborated during the 1930s to transfer German Jews to Palestine;
2. the Warburgs financed this transfer:
3. the Warburgs organised opposition to international boycotts of the Nazis;
4. the Warburgs were at the centre of German government finance and economics;
5. the Warburgs were the largest stockholders in I G Farben, described as "a state within a state", which financed Nazis at home and abroad;
6. the Warburgs were great family friends with the Rothschilds, with each family sending their sons to each others banking houses for training.
By avoiding discussion of WW2 Molynuex also avoids discussion of just how many Jews died in WW2. The claim by Israelis is that 6 million Jews died. But just last week a rabbi stated that less than 1 million died.
I'm not sure I can trust Molyneux, but he does say more truth than most.
Islam started the war against the west and is now working with the left - https://t.co/4CdlWSdp7Q
— Alex Jones (@RealAlexJones) January 8, 2016But who is Molyneux?
I watched another video of his on the Israel-Palestine conflict.
Molyneux does say a lot of truth, more than most, but to me pins Zionism on the rabbis rather than the Rothschilds. Indeed, Molyneux mentions the Rothschilds just once, when he discusses The Balfour Declaration.
According to Molyneux, Zionism began in 1861 when some rabbis decided that Jews could never live with non-Jews so they began to encourage wealthy Jewish bankers to buy Palestine from the Ottomans.
But well before this, Moses Montefiore had decided to dedicate his life and fortune to establishing a Jewish colony in Palestine. And well before this, the founder of the Rothschild banking dynasty, Mayer Amschel, was a follower and financier of Jacob Frank, who claimed that he was the reincarnation of Sabbatai Zevi, who claimed that he was the Messiah returned to lead the Jews back to Palestine. Thus, Frank was implicitly claiming that he was the Messiah. Moses Montefiore and Nathan Mayer Rothschild were brother-in-laws having married two daughters of Levy Barent Cohen.
The Rothschilds financed the first Jewish settlement Rishon-leZion, which Baron Edmond de Rothschild turned into a winery to support the settlement.
But it is how Molyneux avoids discussing the following which raises some doubt about his sincerity:
1. the Nazis and the Zionists collaborated during the 1930s to transfer German Jews to Palestine;
2. the Warburgs financed this transfer:
3. the Warburgs organised opposition to international boycotts of the Nazis;
4. the Warburgs were at the centre of German government finance and economics;
5. the Warburgs were the largest stockholders in I G Farben, described as "a state within a state", which financed Nazis at home and abroad;
6. the Warburgs were great family friends with the Rothschilds, with each family sending their sons to each others banking houses for training.
By avoiding discussion of WW2 Molynuex also avoids discussion of just how many Jews died in WW2. The claim by Israelis is that 6 million Jews died. But just last week a rabbi stated that less than 1 million died.
I'm not sure I can trust Molyneux, but he does say more truth than most.
ACADEMIC : ISLAMIC SHARIA COURTS AND JEWISH BETH DIN COUNCILS ARE VERY SIMILAR
While Israel destroys Gaza, bombs babies to bits, builds illegal settlements and runs false flag terror attacks using Muslims, Muslims harrass women and execute terror attacks under the supervision of Zionist/NATO/Gulf state intelligence services.
They are just as bad as each other.
They are just as bad as each other.
The study by Ms Zee, from Leiden University in the Netherlands, first came to attention last month when The Independent revealed her findings that Muslim sharia courts allegedly set out to frustrate women whose husbands do not want them to leave. Her work has been backed by the crossbench peer Baroness Cox, who is sponsoring a law that could restrict religious courts and calls Ms Zee’s evidence the “tip of the iceberg”.
The academic, whose book will be launched on Tuesday at a House of Lords event chaired by the former High Court judge Baroness Butler-Sloss, said there were striking similarities between sharia courts and Jewish Orthodox Beth Din councils in how they deal with women seeking a “religious divorce”.
[source : UK Jewish Orthodox councils 'institutionalising marital captivity and upholding discriminatory religious laws', The Independent, http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/uk-jewish-orthodox-councils-institutionalising-marital-captivity-and-upholding-discriminatory-a6803256.html, 8th January 2016]
Friday, January 08, 2016
OOPSADAISY! FARAGE ADMITS CLAIM OF AN ASSASSINATION ATTEMPT WAS A LOAD OF OLD BOLLOCKS
The UKIP clowns are indeed imploding!
First Carswell calls for Farage to go.
Then Farage claims that someone tried to kill him by loosening a nut on a wheel on his car, which came off while he was driving at high speed on a French motorway.
Then it was claimed that Carswell was the alleged assassin.
But now, Farage admits that it was all made up!!
For further details see:
First Carswell calls for Farage to go.
Then Farage claims that someone tried to kill him by loosening a nut on a wheel on his car, which came off while he was driving at high speed on a French motorway.
Then it was claimed that Carswell was the alleged assassin.
But now, Farage admits that it was all made up!!
Nigel Farage has said he made a "terrible, terrible mistake" by speaking to journalists about a car accident in France, which was branded as an assassination attempt.
...The wheel came off Mr Farage's Volvo V70 while he was driving on a motorway, but French police and mechanics have since said there was no sign of foul play.
... The anti-EU campaigner had previously told how mechanics in France said the nuts on his wheel had been unscrewed.
He said: "The French police looked at it and said that sometimes nuts on one wheel can come a bit loose – but not on all four… The mechanics were absolutely certain of [foul play] but I have decided to take no further action."
For further details see:
Nigel Farage: I made a 'terrible, terrible mistake' over assassination attempt claims https://t.co/HPqYrbsxQO pic.twitter.com/pMcT8yE9zH
— The Telegraph (@Telegraph) January 8, 2016