Two weeks ago I posted "A Primer in Conspiraloonacy" and mentioned it at Rachel of North London's blog, where it appeared to cause a furore because immediately the insults and stalking began with no attempt to disprove the thesis set out. Since then I have posted a quote from a Director of the Bank of England to support the thesis which sets out in plain English what a fraud the banking system is, and which also helps to explain how a global conspiracy can be managed and financed by a select self-appointed elite, because they can create as much money as they want for their evil, megalomaniac purpose; a world government which they control. Just in case people cannot understand the outrageousness, audacity and fraudulence involved in how money can be created by these self-appointed money masters I also provided three days ago an example of how this system works with The Bank of Fraud.
We in the UK now allegedly owe £1 TRILLION through personal debt to these self-appointed money masters. Or do we? If the banks etc are just creating the 'money' by printing paper or writing a number into a spreadsheet, what exactly do we owe? Perhaps more importantly, what does the rest of the world e.g. Africa, owe to these self-appointed money masters? Not one blog has disproved my claim, or even addressed it. Why? There is a suspicious silence on this subject in the blogosphere. Charles Clarke is in trouble for allowing over 200 foreign criminals to avoid deportation. Wow! Compared to the death that third world debt has caused, created by our sick banking system, that is nothing. Clarke may go, even Blair, to be replaced by another clone. Meanwhile the banks are continuing to create paper and electronic money, conning people and countries into thinking they are being loaned real physical money, when in fact they are being loaned thin air or paper. In return the banks want the world.
So, what's more important; Clarke, and even Blair, to go? Or to expose this fraudulent banking system and how it has been used for evil, megalomaniac purposes and, as Josiah Stamp suggests, to take that power away from the banks because if we don't they will continue to create credit for themselves to take control of the world and eventually you?
I have to say, I was suspicious. Now I am almost certain.
Friday, April 28, 2006
Tuesday, April 25, 2006
SO, WHO HAS WRITTEN TO THE BANK OF ENGLAND?
Last week I posted a quote from a former Director of the Bank of England, Sir Josiah Stamp, in which he describes in plain English how our banking system works.
In case you still cannot grasp how much of a fraud our banking system is, here is an example;
But also imagine this; what if Mr Z is a bad, bad man, and will do anything for money, including start a war which will help the owners of The Bank of Fraud to increase their control? The Bank of Fraud can issue Mr Z with a 'loan' by issuing a promissory note. Mr Z can then spend that 'money' by buying weapons and paying agents to start a war. The people Mr Z pays can then ask The Bank of Fraud for repayment, and The Bank of Fraud can then ask its debtors to repay their loans, and some may even end up in bonded slavery to the bank. The war does what it was supposed to do and the owners of The Bank of Fraud have increased their control. And they can easily write off Mr Z's debt so Mr Z owes the bank nothing!
This is basically what has happened and is happening.
The Bank of Fraud can issue money to whoever it likes and for whatever purpose it likes!
"Banking was conceived in iniquity and was born in sin. The Bankers own the earth. Take it away from them, but leave them the power to create deposits, and with the flick of the pen they will create enough deposits to buy it back again. However, take it away from them, and all the great fortunes like mine will disappear and they ought to disappear, for this would be a happier and better world to live in. But, if you wish to remain the slaves of Bankers and pay the cost of your own slavery, let them continue to create deposits".- SIR JOSIAH STAMP,(President of the Bank of England in the 1920's so he should definitely know)
In case you still cannot grasp how much of a fraud our banking system is, here is an example;
A bank, The Bank of Fraud, has one gold bar in its vault worth £100, and does not have any debts owed to it to call upon. Mr X asks the bank for a loan of £100, the bank agrees and issues a promissory banknote for £100 to Mr X.
Mrs Y also asks the bank for a loan of £100, the bank agrees and issues a promissory banknote for £100 to Mrs Y.
Each loan agreement would give the bank £7 in interest, so that the total repayment is £107.
So now Mr X and Mrs Y each owe the bank £100.
Now Mr X and Mrs Y begin to repay The Bank of Fraud with interest, so that when the loans have been repaid in full The Bank of Fraud has £314 (= £100[gold] + £107 +£107) all from one gold bar worth £100.
Is this the biggest fraud you have ever seen in your life?
To issue the 'loans' (and the word is used in its losest definition) the bank does not have any other debts to call on, and does not get the money from anywhere else e.g. selling assets. It simply has printed two promissory banknotes each for £100 thereby 'creating' £200 (for at the beginning there was only the one bar of gold worth £100).
Question; to whom does the gold bar belong?
The gold bar has stayed in the bank's vault, so the bank has physical control of the gold bar. But the bank also issued promissory banknotes to Mr X and Mrs Y.
What if Mr X and Mrs Y leave the bank and immediately pass the notes onto Mr A and Mrs B in exchange for goods/services. But then the economy crashes, and Mr A and Mrs B arrive at the doors of The Bank of Fraud and demand payment (for the notes are promissory notes to pay £100 in gold). The Bank of Fraud only has £100 in gold, but Mr X and Mrs Y 'owe' the bank £100 each. So the bank demands immediate repayment of half of each loan in gold, and in order to do this Mr X and Mrs Y must each sell all their belongings and they are left penniless. But they still owe The Bank of Fraud £50 each, and the bank will not accept bankruptcy, but will accept bonded slavery.
Thus Mr X and Mrs Y believing they were 'loaned' £100 each have now become slaves to The Bank of Fraud.
What exactly did the bank 'loan' to Mr X and Mrs Y?
Is the word 'loan' used erroneously?
Has the bank deceived Mr X and Mrs Y into believing that control and/or ownership of the £100 bar of gold has been transferred to them, when it has not?
And what happens when we live in a cashless society when electronic money is the only 'money' there is?
But also imagine this; what if Mr Z is a bad, bad man, and will do anything for money, including start a war which will help the owners of The Bank of Fraud to increase their control? The Bank of Fraud can issue Mr Z with a 'loan' by issuing a promissory note. Mr Z can then spend that 'money' by buying weapons and paying agents to start a war. The people Mr Z pays can then ask The Bank of Fraud for repayment, and The Bank of Fraud can then ask its debtors to repay their loans, and some may even end up in bonded slavery to the bank. The war does what it was supposed to do and the owners of The Bank of Fraud have increased their control. And they can easily write off Mr Z's debt so Mr Z owes the bank nothing!
This is basically what has happened and is happening.
The Bank of Fraud can issue money to whoever it likes and for whatever purpose it likes!
Monday, April 24, 2006
SO, THEY DID KNOW ALL ALONG!
Yes, we knew they knew Iraq had no WMD. That's why the phrase "WMD-related activities" was used. And remember Cheney and Rumsfeld saying, "we know where they are; they're around the area of Tikrit, and North, East, South and West of Baghdad...".
From http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/23/60-minutes-cia-official-reveals-bush-cheney-rice-were-personally-told-iraq-had-no-wmd-in-fall-2002/
60 Minutes: CIA Official Reveals Bush, Cheney, Rice Were Personally Told Iraq Had No WMD in Fall 2002
Tonight on 60 Minutes, Tyler Drumheller, the former chief of the CIA’s Europe division, revealed that in the fall of 2002, President Bush, Vice President Cheney, then-National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice and others were told by CIA Director George Tenet that Iraq’s foreign minister — who agreed to act as a spy for the United States — had reported that Iraq had no active weapons of mass destruction program.
OK, so when do did the Bliar know?
But what sort of force would lie like that?
From http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/23/60-minutes-cia-official-reveals-bush-cheney-rice-were-personally-told-iraq-had-no-wmd-in-fall-2002/
60 Minutes: CIA Official Reveals Bush, Cheney, Rice Were Personally Told Iraq Had No WMD in Fall 2002
Tonight on 60 Minutes, Tyler Drumheller, the former chief of the CIA’s Europe division, revealed that in the fall of 2002, President Bush, Vice President Cheney, then-National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice and others were told by CIA Director George Tenet that Iraq’s foreign minister — who agreed to act as a spy for the United States — had reported that Iraq had no active weapons of mass destruction program.
BRADLEY: According to Drumheller, CIA Director George Tenet delivered the news about the Iraqi foreign minister at a high level meeting at the White House.
DRUMHELLER: The President, the Vice President, Dr. Rice…
BRADLEY: And at that meeting…?
DRUMHELLER: They were enthusiastic because they said they were excited that we had a high-level penetration of Iraqis.
BRADLEY: And what did this high level source tell you?
DRUMHELLER: He told us that they had no active weapons of mass destruction program.
BRADLEY: So, in the fall of 2002, before going to war, we had it on good authority from a source within Saddam’s inner circle that he didn’t have an active program for weapons of mass destruction?
DRUMHELLER: Yes.
BRADLEY: There’s no doubt in your mind about that?
DRUMHELLER: No doubt in my mind at all.
BRADLEY: It directly contradicts, though, what the President and his staff were telling us.
DRUMHELLER: The policy was set. The war in Iraq was coming, and they were looking for intelligence to fit into the policy, to justify the policy.
OK, so when do did the Bliar know?
But what sort of force would lie like that?
Saturday, April 22, 2006
REPOST : DISAPPOINTMENT AND SUSPICION
I recently concentrated four years of part-time research into what is known as The New World Order in a blog entry called "A PRIMER IN CONSPIRALOONACY".
In that blog entry I stated that certain people in this world have the power to create money, money money for themselves, their friends and cronies, and for dictators and wars, while the rest of us must work increasingly like PoWs just to have enough left over for a brief holiday somewhere in the sun.
When I first learned that the power to create money is not in the hands of the government but is instead in the hands of private individuals I was very angry, for I then saw how a global conspiracy could be financed.
When I read what the people who have this tremendous power of life and death have done, at first I didn't believe it. I didn't think anyone could be that organised, but more importantly also have that evil force inside of them to drive them and commit the alleged crimes against humanity.
Instead of either 1) instantly dismissing the allegations, or 2) taking the allegations as stated, I checked them out.
I checked out if indeed Fractional Reserve Banking is in operation by asking the Bank of England if it was true. They replied that indeed it was.
I checked out the allegation that the Bolshevik Revolution was financed and controlled by Wall Street and the City of London. see Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution by Antony C Sutton.
I checked out the allegation that Soviet Russia was virtually built by the West (USA, UK and Germany). see Western Technology and Soviet Economic Development by Antony C Sutton
I checked out the allegation that Nazi Germany was also financed and created by Wall Street and the City of London. see Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler by Antony C Sutton, Trading with the Enemy; The Nazi - American Money Plot 1933-1949 by Charles Higham, and George Bush; The Unauthorized Biography by Webster Tarpley.
I checked out the allegation that British Intelligence through Giuseppe Mazzini's Young Europe and Freemasonry were intimately involved in the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand of Austria. see The Secret Powers Behind Revolution by Vicomte Leon de Poncins, and the outstanding works by Webster Tarpley on Giuseppe Mazzini and British Intelligence during the 19th Century.
Besides these I checked out Tragedy and Hope by Carroll Quigley, The Creature from Jekyll Island by G. Edward Griffin, The Rockefeller File and None Dare Call It Conspiracy by Gary Allen, and Secrets of The Federal Reserve by Eustace Mullins.
With all this read and processed, there is absolutely no doubt in my mind that what I wrote in "A PRIMER IN CONSPIRALOONACY" is true. But it also makes sense. It explains how Great Britain and the USA have come to dominate the world so. It is nothing to do with being chosen by some God, or serendipity, and everything to do with manipulation, fraud, murder and genocide.
Hence the inverted, incomplete and irregular pentagram directly to the North of the White House.
It doesn't matter if the people with this power to create money claim to be Jews, Hindus, or Martians. What they have done is just plain WRONG! When you understand what they have done (and I urge readers, particularly readers with interests in "secret history", to read all the aforementioned books and authors) then you see through these self-appointed money masters. You see through their manipulating and lying.
As with all things it's taking that first step into the unknown. I was apprehensive at first, for I couldn't quite believe that what was alleged could ever be concealed.
But can you guess who owns the news outlets and publishers? clue: they can create lot and lots of money to buy news outlets and publishers.
Can you also guess who tempts politicians with cushy posts as advisors and consultants? clue: they can create lot and lots of money to own corporations and think tanks who can employ powerful politicians after office.
Take that first step today.
In that blog entry I stated that certain people in this world have the power to create money, money money for themselves, their friends and cronies, and for dictators and wars, while the rest of us must work increasingly like PoWs just to have enough left over for a brief holiday somewhere in the sun.
When I first learned that the power to create money is not in the hands of the government but is instead in the hands of private individuals I was very angry, for I then saw how a global conspiracy could be financed.
When I read what the people who have this tremendous power of life and death have done, at first I didn't believe it. I didn't think anyone could be that organised, but more importantly also have that evil force inside of them to drive them and commit the alleged crimes against humanity.
Instead of either 1) instantly dismissing the allegations, or 2) taking the allegations as stated, I checked them out.
I checked out if indeed Fractional Reserve Banking is in operation by asking the Bank of England if it was true. They replied that indeed it was.
I checked out the allegation that the Bolshevik Revolution was financed and controlled by Wall Street and the City of London. see Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution by Antony C Sutton.
I checked out the allegation that Soviet Russia was virtually built by the West (USA, UK and Germany). see Western Technology and Soviet Economic Development by Antony C Sutton
I checked out the allegation that Nazi Germany was also financed and created by Wall Street and the City of London. see Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler by Antony C Sutton, Trading with the Enemy; The Nazi - American Money Plot 1933-1949 by Charles Higham, and George Bush; The Unauthorized Biography by Webster Tarpley.
I checked out the allegation that British Intelligence through Giuseppe Mazzini's Young Europe and Freemasonry were intimately involved in the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand of Austria. see The Secret Powers Behind Revolution by Vicomte Leon de Poncins, and the outstanding works by Webster Tarpley on Giuseppe Mazzini and British Intelligence during the 19th Century.
Besides these I checked out Tragedy and Hope by Carroll Quigley, The Creature from Jekyll Island by G. Edward Griffin, The Rockefeller File and None Dare Call It Conspiracy by Gary Allen, and Secrets of The Federal Reserve by Eustace Mullins.
With all this read and processed, there is absolutely no doubt in my mind that what I wrote in "A PRIMER IN CONSPIRALOONACY" is true. But it also makes sense. It explains how Great Britain and the USA have come to dominate the world so. It is nothing to do with being chosen by some God, or serendipity, and everything to do with manipulation, fraud, murder and genocide.
Hence the inverted, incomplete and irregular pentagram directly to the North of the White House.
It doesn't matter if the people with this power to create money claim to be Jews, Hindus, or Martians. What they have done is just plain WRONG! When you understand what they have done (and I urge readers, particularly readers with interests in "secret history", to read all the aforementioned books and authors) then you see through these self-appointed money masters. You see through their manipulating and lying.
As with all things it's taking that first step into the unknown. I was apprehensive at first, for I couldn't quite believe that what was alleged could ever be concealed.
But can you guess who owns the news outlets and publishers? clue: they can create lot and lots of money to buy news outlets and publishers.
Can you also guess who tempts politicians with cushy posts as advisors and consultants? clue: they can create lot and lots of money to own corporations and think tanks who can employ powerful politicians after office.
Take that first step today.
REPOST : A PRIMER IN CONSPIRALOONACY (and it's lizard-free!)
"Give me control of a nation's currency and I care not who makes the laws".
This quotation is attributed to Mayer Amschel Rothschild. He had five sons and one was sent to each of London, Paris, Vienna, Naples and Frankfurt, and they each opened a bank. They coordinated their lending policies. The son who came to London, Nathan, ripped off the stock brokers of London during the Battle of Waterloo and made a fortune, virtually buying up all British government bonds at a fraction of their true value after he pretended that Wellington had lost while already knowing that Wellington had in fact won. With this fortune Nathan bought out the then privately-owned Bank of England in 1825, and since then the Rothschilds have been directing British domestic and foreign policies. They controlled the issuance of the British currency. They could decide how much money was in circulation. But more importantly they could create money for whoever they wanted through a system of banking called Fractional Reserve Banking. This system allows the Rothschilds, and bankers in general, to simply create money with a stroke of a pen. They can create money for themselves, their friends and cronies, for dictators and for wars, while we must work, work, work leaving little time for anything else.
So with all this power to create money, what do you do with it? Research cancer and methods for stopping it? Abolish poverty and hunger? Or do you fund a couple of dictators and world wars?
Well, we still have a charity for cancer research, and suffered Hitler and Stalin and fought two world wars, each leading to an attempt at world government!
The 19th Century is known as The Age of Rothschild. Through the coordinated policies of their Rothschild family banks, and their control of central banks such as The Bank of England (the banks which issued the national currency), they were the financiers of the British, French and German empires. They also tried to gain control of the USA through several attempts at creating a privately-owned bank, even creating the 1861 Civil War. Each succesful attempt only lasted a handful of years before the American people understood what a Rothschild-controlled-and-owned central bank does; it serves the Rothschilds and not the people. In 1913 they finally got their privately-owned central bank in the form of The Federal Reserve after years of plunging the US economy from boom to bust and paying agents to lobby for the need for a central bank to stop the economic chaos they were in fact creating! This trick is called The Hegelian Dialectic. Create a problem, manage the reaction, and implement the solution. It's basically creating an excuse to do what you want. [For example, say one country's government wants to invade another country but does not have a reasonable enough excuse for the public to support the invasion. Waddya do? Howzabout set up a bunch of patsies, have them hijack a couple of planes on a particular day and arrange several simulations of terrorist attacks for that same day(just like Cheney did), then have your air force stand down, and in the confusion allow the patsies to fly into a few important buildings? (Check out Operation Northwoods). Your public are then baying for blood and you can invade wherever you say the culprits came from!]
Edward VII isolated Germany, creating a series of treaties and gentleman's agreements with the powers of The Congress of Vienna. A British Intelligence network called Young Europe, with Freemasonry, assassinated Archduke Ferdinand. The Archduke himself knew that Freemasonry wanted him dead, and it was also known in certain Freemasonic circles that the Archduke was going to be shot dead. Freemasonry is run from Freemasons Hall, London (where BBC series "Spooks" was made). The British then pretended to mediate for peace between Austria and Serbia, and told Germany it would not get involved in any war. Germany had previously shown that it would back down at the potential for conflict with Britain. So with Britain indicating that it would not involve itself in the conflict Germany encouraged Austria to pursue a military solution. So Austria, with support from Germany, declared war and the treaties and agreements arranged by Edward VII then began to fall into place, and countries took sides. As soon as Germany invaded Belgium as part the Schlieffen Plan to take out Paris the British then cited an obscure treaty with Belgium and joined the Great War. Britain had already sent its Expeditionary Force with supplies in anticipation of this move by Germany. Thus Germany and Austria were tricked into aggression by Britain. But by 1916 the Allies were in financial trouble. The USA and its newly created Federal Reserve couldn't lend the Allies money because the USA had not formally declared war. The war was 3000 miles away and the American public had no stomach for it. So The Lusitania was allowed to be sunk by Germany (when Churchill was in charge of the Navy) while it was carrying American passengers and illegally carrying ammunition. The USA went wild and formally joined the war in 1917. Germany didn't stand a chance and a year later the war ended. This then led to the Treaty of Versailles which labelled Germany as the aggressor and ordered Germany to pay enormous war reparations. The first attempt at a World Governnment was made with The League of Nations. Its HQ was donated by the Rockefellers, co-conspirators and fellow central bankers with the Rothschilds via their shares in the privately-owned Federal Reserve. The enormous demand for money during the war from The Federal Reserve from the Allies then allowed the likes of the Rothschilds and Rockefellers to create lots and lots of money which fed the 1920's boom. But in Germany Wall Street banks also created the cartels such as IG Farben which would come to dominate the German war industries. Kaiser Wilhem II was told by a Freemason that Freemasonry i.e. Britain, wanted to destroy the central european powers.
The League of Nations failed because the USA voted out of it. In order to help persuade the USA that it should join a world government The Royal Institute of International Affairs was created in Britain, and its sister The Council on Foreign Relations in the USA. Since then all Presidents of the USA have been members of the CFR. The League of Nations had been sold as the answer to all man's problems caused by World War 1. In order to create another World Government which would survive, a longer and bloodier war was required.
So Hitler was financed by Wall Street into power. A patsy was blamed for the Reichstag Fire and Hitler assumed total control. American industries collaborated with Germany to build its war industries. Rockefellers gave IG Farben the patents to manufacture synthetic oil and rubber, absolutely necessary for a mobile land war machine. Germany had little access to either. Rockefeller also financed the racial and mental hygiene studies in Berlin. Ford built tanks. The list is endless. Hitler was allowed to rebuild Germany specifically for war. The Treaty of Versailles had reduced Germany's defences to virtually nil, but in the space of 15 years, and despite Hitler's demands for expansion, he was allowed by the Allies to rebuild the Wehrmacht. He invaded France, Austria, Czechoslovakia and finally Poland. He was reclaiming what the Treaty of Versailles had taken away. This was all set out in the Nazi Party manifesto, which is why he received substantial Wall Street support because Wall Street wanted another terrible war. Britain then declares war to defend Poland and the Rothschild crony Churchill is appointed PM.
Regarding ideologies, Hitler's enemy was Communism. Russia had been under attack from Great Britain since the mid 19th Century. Young Russia, controlled from London, was created for terrorism within Russia. Derivatives of Young Russia made several assassination attempts on the Tsar and his officials and succeeded. Communism, like Islamic Fundamentalism, was fostered in London. The Communist Party was created in London, with Marx and Engels being paid to write the manifesto. The 1848 revolutions were controlled from London and run out of Freemasonic lodges. In 1905 a revolution financed by Rothschild agent Schiff failed. But in 1917 The Bolshevik Revolution was successful at overthrowing the Russian monarchy. We associate this revolution with Lenin and Trotsky. Lenin was sent into Russia in a sealed train by Germany with "the Rothschild gold", or rather an element within Germany working for the Rothschilds, namely Freemason and Rothschild-cousin Bethmann-Hollweg. Trotsky was living it up in New York and set sail for Russia. He was stopped en route in Canada suspected of being a German agent, but was released with the help of British and American miilitary officials. Once in Russia Lenin and Trotsky were supervised by British Agent Bruce Lockhart and the American Raymond Robins. It was MI6 agent Captain George Hill who created the Cheka to destroy the counter-revolution so that the Bolsheviks would retain control. Schiff and others from the Rothschild circle later admitted to financing the Bolsheviks. They were rewarded with juicy contracts for natural resources and industrial and military development. Thus Wall Street and the City of London created and built Communist Russia.
So from the start the Soviet Empire had been helped into creation by Wall Street and the City of London. Similarly for Nazi Germany. These two fight. Pearl Harbour was 1) provoked, and 2) allowed to happen, thus bringing the USA into the war. During the war the factories of Wall Street subsids in Germany were not bombed. Several suggestions from Abwehr Chief Admiral Canaris that he hand Hitler over to the Allies were refused. Both of these actions allowed the war to go on and on, leading to more death and destruction, and increasing the likelihood that a world government would be accepted aferwards by the survivors.
So after nearly six years of yet another world war the world was ready to accept a world government; The United Nations. And again, the Rockefellers donated the HQ for this world government, which ironically is on the grounds of a former slaughterhouse.
The UN has since been gradually assuming more and more control over governments.
Intermediate supernational organizations are growing in influence; NATO is in Afghanistan and is now being sent to Africa. The EU and NAFTA are creating virtual governments and expanding. Once our governments have ceded more control to the likes of the EU and NATO then it will be much easier for the EU etc to cede total control to the UN.
And who housed the UN? The Rockefellers.
And who financed the Rockefellers? The Rothschilds.
Both are major shareholders in The Federal Reserve, with the Rothschilds having more control.
This has all been financed by the banking system known as Fractional Reserve Banking which allows the banks to create paper and electronic money that did not exist and lend it out as if it was backed by some precious metal, when it is not. In return the bankers want your car, your house, your country, your world and ultimately you in debt slavery. They currently hold the 3rd world in debt slavery and are now after you.
Do you get it now?
First, understand what Fractional Reserve Banking is, and then ask the Bank of England if such a banking system is in operation.
But also ask yourself; if they are prepared to have millions and millions of men, women and children die in world wars, and from hunger and starvation due to a debt they don't really owe, how hard is it for them to order a terrorist attack on London, or Washington and New York? (Remember Londonistan and Hempher)
This quotation is attributed to Mayer Amschel Rothschild. He had five sons and one was sent to each of London, Paris, Vienna, Naples and Frankfurt, and they each opened a bank. They coordinated their lending policies. The son who came to London, Nathan, ripped off the stock brokers of London during the Battle of Waterloo and made a fortune, virtually buying up all British government bonds at a fraction of their true value after he pretended that Wellington had lost while already knowing that Wellington had in fact won. With this fortune Nathan bought out the then privately-owned Bank of England in 1825, and since then the Rothschilds have been directing British domestic and foreign policies. They controlled the issuance of the British currency. They could decide how much money was in circulation. But more importantly they could create money for whoever they wanted through a system of banking called Fractional Reserve Banking. This system allows the Rothschilds, and bankers in general, to simply create money with a stroke of a pen. They can create money for themselves, their friends and cronies, for dictators and for wars, while we must work, work, work leaving little time for anything else.
So with all this power to create money, what do you do with it? Research cancer and methods for stopping it? Abolish poverty and hunger? Or do you fund a couple of dictators and world wars?
Well, we still have a charity for cancer research, and suffered Hitler and Stalin and fought two world wars, each leading to an attempt at world government!
The 19th Century is known as The Age of Rothschild. Through the coordinated policies of their Rothschild family banks, and their control of central banks such as The Bank of England (the banks which issued the national currency), they were the financiers of the British, French and German empires. They also tried to gain control of the USA through several attempts at creating a privately-owned bank, even creating the 1861 Civil War. Each succesful attempt only lasted a handful of years before the American people understood what a Rothschild-controlled-and-owned central bank does; it serves the Rothschilds and not the people. In 1913 they finally got their privately-owned central bank in the form of The Federal Reserve after years of plunging the US economy from boom to bust and paying agents to lobby for the need for a central bank to stop the economic chaos they were in fact creating! This trick is called The Hegelian Dialectic. Create a problem, manage the reaction, and implement the solution. It's basically creating an excuse to do what you want. [For example, say one country's government wants to invade another country but does not have a reasonable enough excuse for the public to support the invasion. Waddya do? Howzabout set up a bunch of patsies, have them hijack a couple of planes on a particular day and arrange several simulations of terrorist attacks for that same day(just like Cheney did), then have your air force stand down, and in the confusion allow the patsies to fly into a few important buildings? (Check out Operation Northwoods). Your public are then baying for blood and you can invade wherever you say the culprits came from!]
Edward VII isolated Germany, creating a series of treaties and gentleman's agreements with the powers of The Congress of Vienna. A British Intelligence network called Young Europe, with Freemasonry, assassinated Archduke Ferdinand. The Archduke himself knew that Freemasonry wanted him dead, and it was also known in certain Freemasonic circles that the Archduke was going to be shot dead. Freemasonry is run from Freemasons Hall, London (where BBC series "Spooks" was made). The British then pretended to mediate for peace between Austria and Serbia, and told Germany it would not get involved in any war. Germany had previously shown that it would back down at the potential for conflict with Britain. So with Britain indicating that it would not involve itself in the conflict Germany encouraged Austria to pursue a military solution. So Austria, with support from Germany, declared war and the treaties and agreements arranged by Edward VII then began to fall into place, and countries took sides. As soon as Germany invaded Belgium as part the Schlieffen Plan to take out Paris the British then cited an obscure treaty with Belgium and joined the Great War. Britain had already sent its Expeditionary Force with supplies in anticipation of this move by Germany. Thus Germany and Austria were tricked into aggression by Britain. But by 1916 the Allies were in financial trouble. The USA and its newly created Federal Reserve couldn't lend the Allies money because the USA had not formally declared war. The war was 3000 miles away and the American public had no stomach for it. So The Lusitania was allowed to be sunk by Germany (when Churchill was in charge of the Navy) while it was carrying American passengers and illegally carrying ammunition. The USA went wild and formally joined the war in 1917. Germany didn't stand a chance and a year later the war ended. This then led to the Treaty of Versailles which labelled Germany as the aggressor and ordered Germany to pay enormous war reparations. The first attempt at a World Governnment was made with The League of Nations. Its HQ was donated by the Rockefellers, co-conspirators and fellow central bankers with the Rothschilds via their shares in the privately-owned Federal Reserve. The enormous demand for money during the war from The Federal Reserve from the Allies then allowed the likes of the Rothschilds and Rockefellers to create lots and lots of money which fed the 1920's boom. But in Germany Wall Street banks also created the cartels such as IG Farben which would come to dominate the German war industries. Kaiser Wilhem II was told by a Freemason that Freemasonry i.e. Britain, wanted to destroy the central european powers.
The League of Nations failed because the USA voted out of it. In order to help persuade the USA that it should join a world government The Royal Institute of International Affairs was created in Britain, and its sister The Council on Foreign Relations in the USA. Since then all Presidents of the USA have been members of the CFR. The League of Nations had been sold as the answer to all man's problems caused by World War 1. In order to create another World Government which would survive, a longer and bloodier war was required.
So Hitler was financed by Wall Street into power. A patsy was blamed for the Reichstag Fire and Hitler assumed total control. American industries collaborated with Germany to build its war industries. Rockefellers gave IG Farben the patents to manufacture synthetic oil and rubber, absolutely necessary for a mobile land war machine. Germany had little access to either. Rockefeller also financed the racial and mental hygiene studies in Berlin. Ford built tanks. The list is endless. Hitler was allowed to rebuild Germany specifically for war. The Treaty of Versailles had reduced Germany's defences to virtually nil, but in the space of 15 years, and despite Hitler's demands for expansion, he was allowed by the Allies to rebuild the Wehrmacht. He invaded France, Austria, Czechoslovakia and finally Poland. He was reclaiming what the Treaty of Versailles had taken away. This was all set out in the Nazi Party manifesto, which is why he received substantial Wall Street support because Wall Street wanted another terrible war. Britain then declares war to defend Poland and the Rothschild crony Churchill is appointed PM.
Regarding ideologies, Hitler's enemy was Communism. Russia had been under attack from Great Britain since the mid 19th Century. Young Russia, controlled from London, was created for terrorism within Russia. Derivatives of Young Russia made several assassination attempts on the Tsar and his officials and succeeded. Communism, like Islamic Fundamentalism, was fostered in London. The Communist Party was created in London, with Marx and Engels being paid to write the manifesto. The 1848 revolutions were controlled from London and run out of Freemasonic lodges. In 1905 a revolution financed by Rothschild agent Schiff failed. But in 1917 The Bolshevik Revolution was successful at overthrowing the Russian monarchy. We associate this revolution with Lenin and Trotsky. Lenin was sent into Russia in a sealed train by Germany with "the Rothschild gold", or rather an element within Germany working for the Rothschilds, namely Freemason and Rothschild-cousin Bethmann-Hollweg. Trotsky was living it up in New York and set sail for Russia. He was stopped en route in Canada suspected of being a German agent, but was released with the help of British and American miilitary officials. Once in Russia Lenin and Trotsky were supervised by British Agent Bruce Lockhart and the American Raymond Robins. It was MI6 agent Captain George Hill who created the Cheka to destroy the counter-revolution so that the Bolsheviks would retain control. Schiff and others from the Rothschild circle later admitted to financing the Bolsheviks. They were rewarded with juicy contracts for natural resources and industrial and military development. Thus Wall Street and the City of London created and built Communist Russia.
So from the start the Soviet Empire had been helped into creation by Wall Street and the City of London. Similarly for Nazi Germany. These two fight. Pearl Harbour was 1) provoked, and 2) allowed to happen, thus bringing the USA into the war. During the war the factories of Wall Street subsids in Germany were not bombed. Several suggestions from Abwehr Chief Admiral Canaris that he hand Hitler over to the Allies were refused. Both of these actions allowed the war to go on and on, leading to more death and destruction, and increasing the likelihood that a world government would be accepted aferwards by the survivors.
So after nearly six years of yet another world war the world was ready to accept a world government; The United Nations. And again, the Rockefellers donated the HQ for this world government, which ironically is on the grounds of a former slaughterhouse.
The UN has since been gradually assuming more and more control over governments.
Intermediate supernational organizations are growing in influence; NATO is in Afghanistan and is now being sent to Africa. The EU and NAFTA are creating virtual governments and expanding. Once our governments have ceded more control to the likes of the EU and NATO then it will be much easier for the EU etc to cede total control to the UN.
And who housed the UN? The Rockefellers.
And who financed the Rockefellers? The Rothschilds.
Both are major shareholders in The Federal Reserve, with the Rothschilds having more control.
This has all been financed by the banking system known as Fractional Reserve Banking which allows the banks to create paper and electronic money that did not exist and lend it out as if it was backed by some precious metal, when it is not. In return the bankers want your car, your house, your country, your world and ultimately you in debt slavery. They currently hold the 3rd world in debt slavery and are now after you.
Do you get it now?
First, understand what Fractional Reserve Banking is, and then ask the Bank of England if such a banking system is in operation.
But also ask yourself; if they are prepared to have millions and millions of men, women and children die in world wars, and from hunger and starvation due to a debt they don't really owe, how hard is it for them to order a terrorist attack on London, or Washington and New York? (Remember Londonistan and Hempher)
Thursday, April 20, 2006
LET'S SHMOKE 'EM OUT
One of my favourite lines in Michael Moore's film "Fahrenheit 9/11" is from a clip of an old cowboy film. One man holding a rifle and a cigarette in his mouth suggests to several others, and presumably regarding some rogues, "Let's shmoke 'em out".
I wish Moore would use his film-making talent to expose the banking system, in particular The Federal Reserve.
But I like it when upstanding, law-abiding citizens decide to rid themselves of rogue elements, with lines like "Let's shmoke 'em out". Sometimes they are so transparent and amateur.
I wish Moore would use his film-making talent to expose the banking system, in particular The Federal Reserve.
But I like it when upstanding, law-abiding citizens decide to rid themselves of rogue elements, with lines like "Let's shmoke 'em out". Sometimes they are so transparent and amateur.
ABU MUSAB AL-ZARQAWI : THE PSYOP
We trembled at the mere whisper of his name. This 20 foot tall Goliath destroying the occupying forces in Iraq with a flick of his little toe.
This is the image we have of Abu Musab al-Zarqawi. He was blamed for everything that occured in Iraq. Kidnappings and beheadings, bombings, the insurgency. The works. He was al-Qaeda in Iraq. Occupying forces laid waste to whole communities in their quest to hunt this man down.
But last week came the admission, long suspected, that there was more a myth about the man being created by psyops within the occupying forces.
Michael Chossudovsky analyses these latest reports at http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=CHO20060418&articleId=2275
But if al-Zarqawi didn't do half the stuff he was blamed for, then who did?
From the aformentioned article:
If they can do that there with him, why not over here at home with someone else?
This is the image we have of Abu Musab al-Zarqawi. He was blamed for everything that occured in Iraq. Kidnappings and beheadings, bombings, the insurgency. The works. He was al-Qaeda in Iraq. Occupying forces laid waste to whole communities in their quest to hunt this man down.
But last week came the admission, long suspected, that there was more a myth about the man being created by psyops within the occupying forces.
Michael Chossudovsky analyses these latest reports at http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=CHO20060418&articleId=2275
But if al-Zarqawi didn't do half the stuff he was blamed for, then who did?
From the aformentioned article:
In an unusual twist, the Washington Post in a recent article, has acknowledged that the role of Zarqawi had been deliberately "magnified" by the Pentagon with a view to galvanizing public support for the US-UK led "war on terrorism":
The military's propaganda program, according to the Washington Post, has "largely been aimed at Iraqis, but seems to have spilled over into the U.S. media. One briefing slide about U.S. "strategic communications" in Iraq, prepared for Army Gen. George W. Casey Jr., the top U.S. commander in Iraq, describes the "home audience" as one of six major targets of the American side of the war." (WP, op cit.)
An internal document produced by U.S. military headquarters in Iraq, states that "the Zarqawi PSYOP program is the most successful information campaign to date." (WP, op cit) .
If they can do that there with him, why not over here at home with someone else?
Wednesday, April 19, 2006
VOICES FROM THE INSIDE
Voices from the inside have spoken out to tell us of the existence of this immoral banking system, which allows certain self-appointed individuals to create money for themselves, their friends and cronies, and for dictators and wars.
There are crazy conspiracy theories, e.g. Elvis and Santa Claus are controlling the world. But what evidence is there for this?
And yet I can suggest that some self-appointed people have the power to create money, as much money as they want, which they can then use to pay people to do this, that and the other to gain control of the world (and you can prove this to yourself that this power exists by asking the Bank of England itself) and this is also labelled a conspiracy theory.
But debunking one conspiracy theory e.g. Elvis & Santa, does not automatically debunk all of them.
You can ask the Bank of England today, and start from there!
What have these people with this power to create money done? Why are they allowing the 3rd world to die off? Why are charities out in the high streets every Saturday afternoon begging for spare coppers? Events, particularly world wars, need money, and lots of it. Where did that money come from?
Also, is it not possible that agents are being paid to come up with ridiculous conspiracy theories and accusations to give honest researchers a bad name?
[cue verbal abuse]
"It is well that the people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning." -- Henry Ford
"Banking was conceived in iniquity and was born in sin. The Bankers own the earth. Take it away from them, but leave them the power to create deposits, and with the flick of the pen they will create enough deposits to buy it back again. However, take it away from them, and all the great fortunes like mine will disappear and they ought to disappear, for this would be a happier and better world to live in. But, if you wish to remain the slaves of Bankers and pay the cost of your own slavery, let them continue to create deposits".- SIR JOSIAH STAMP,(President of the Bank of England in the 1920's so he should definitely know)
There are crazy conspiracy theories, e.g. Elvis and Santa Claus are controlling the world. But what evidence is there for this?
And yet I can suggest that some self-appointed people have the power to create money, as much money as they want, which they can then use to pay people to do this, that and the other to gain control of the world (and you can prove this to yourself that this power exists by asking the Bank of England itself) and this is also labelled a conspiracy theory.
But debunking one conspiracy theory e.g. Elvis & Santa, does not automatically debunk all of them.
You can ask the Bank of England today, and start from there!
What have these people with this power to create money done? Why are they allowing the 3rd world to die off? Why are charities out in the high streets every Saturday afternoon begging for spare coppers? Events, particularly world wars, need money, and lots of it. Where did that money come from?
Also, is it not possible that agents are being paid to come up with ridiculous conspiracy theories and accusations to give honest researchers a bad name?
[cue verbal abuse]
Monday, April 17, 2006
DISAPPOINTMENT AND SUSPICION
I recently concentrated four years of part-time research into what is known as The New World Order in a blog entry called "A PRIMER IN CONSPIRALOONACY".
In that blog entry I stated that certain people in this world have the power to create money, money money for themselves, their friends and cronies, and for dictators and wars, while the rest of us must work increasingly like PoWs just to have enough left over for a brief holiday somewhere in the sun.
When I first learned that the power to create money is not in the hands of the government but is instead in the hands of private individuals I was very angry, for I then saw how a global conspiracy could be financed.
When I read what the people who have this tremendous power of life and death have done, at first I didn't believe it. I didn't think anyone could be that organised, but more importantly also have that evil force inside of them to drive them and commit the alleged crimes against humanity.
Instead of either 1) instantly dismissing the allegations, or 2) taking the allegations as stated, I checked them out.
I checked out if indeed Fractional Reserve Banking is in operation by asking the Bank of England if it was true. They replied that indeed it was.
I checked out the allegation that the Bolshevik Revolution was financed and controlled by Wall Street and the City of London. see Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution by Antony C Sutton.
I checked out the allegation that Soviet Russia was virtually built by the West (USA, UK and Germany). see Western Technology and Soviet Economic Development by Antony C Sutton
I checked out the allegation that Nazi Germany was also financed and created by Wall Street and the City of London. see Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler by Antony C Sutton, Trading with the Enemy; The Nazi - American Money Plot 1933-1949 by Charles Higham, and George Bush; The Unauthorized Biography by Webster Tarpley.
I checked out the allegation that British Intelligence through Giuseppe Mazzini's Young Europe and Freemasonry were intimately involved in the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand of Austria. see The Secret Powers Behind Revolution by Vicomte Leon de Poncins, and the outstanding works by Webster Tarpley on Giuseppe Mazzini and British Intelligence during the 19th Century.
Besides these I checked out Tragedy and Hope by Carroll Quigley, The Creature from Jekyll Island by G. Edward Griffin, The Rockefeller File and None Dare Call It Conspiracy by Gary Allen, and Secrets of The Federal Reserve by Eustace Mullins.
With all this read and processed, there is absolutely no doubt in my mind that what I wrote in "A PRIMER IN CONSPIRALOONACY" is true. But it also makes sense. It explains how Great Britain and the USA have come to dominate the world so. It is nothing to do with being chosen by some God, or serendipity, and everything to do with manipulation, fraud, murder and genocide.
Hence the inverted, incomplete and irregular pentagram directly to the North of the White House.
It doesn't matter if the people with this power to create money claim to be Jews, Hindus, or Martians. What they have done is just plain WRONG! When you understand what they have done (and I urge readers, particularly readers with interests in "secret history", to read all the aforementioned books and authors) then you see through these self-appointed money masters. You see through their manipulating and lying.
As with all things it's taking that first step into the unknown. I was apprehensive at first, for I couldn't quite believe that what was alleged could ever be concealed.
But can you guess who owns the news outlets and publishers? clue: they can create lot and lots of money to buy news outlets and publishers.
Can you also guess who tempts politicians with cushy posts as advisors and consultants? clue: they can create lot and lots of money to own corporations and think tanks who can employ powerful politicians after office.
Take that first step today.
In that blog entry I stated that certain people in this world have the power to create money, money money for themselves, their friends and cronies, and for dictators and wars, while the rest of us must work increasingly like PoWs just to have enough left over for a brief holiday somewhere in the sun.
When I first learned that the power to create money is not in the hands of the government but is instead in the hands of private individuals I was very angry, for I then saw how a global conspiracy could be financed.
When I read what the people who have this tremendous power of life and death have done, at first I didn't believe it. I didn't think anyone could be that organised, but more importantly also have that evil force inside of them to drive them and commit the alleged crimes against humanity.
Instead of either 1) instantly dismissing the allegations, or 2) taking the allegations as stated, I checked them out.
I checked out if indeed Fractional Reserve Banking is in operation by asking the Bank of England if it was true. They replied that indeed it was.
I checked out the allegation that the Bolshevik Revolution was financed and controlled by Wall Street and the City of London. see Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution by Antony C Sutton.
I checked out the allegation that Soviet Russia was virtually built by the West (USA, UK and Germany). see Western Technology and Soviet Economic Development by Antony C Sutton
I checked out the allegation that Nazi Germany was also financed and created by Wall Street and the City of London. see Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler by Antony C Sutton, Trading with the Enemy; The Nazi - American Money Plot 1933-1949 by Charles Higham, and George Bush; The Unauthorized Biography by Webster Tarpley.
I checked out the allegation that British Intelligence through Giuseppe Mazzini's Young Europe and Freemasonry were intimately involved in the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand of Austria. see The Secret Powers Behind Revolution by Vicomte Leon de Poncins, and the outstanding works by Webster Tarpley on Giuseppe Mazzini and British Intelligence during the 19th Century.
Besides these I checked out Tragedy and Hope by Carroll Quigley, The Creature from Jekyll Island by G. Edward Griffin, The Rockefeller File and None Dare Call It Conspiracy by Gary Allen, and Secrets of The Federal Reserve by Eustace Mullins.
With all this read and processed, there is absolutely no doubt in my mind that what I wrote in "A PRIMER IN CONSPIRALOONACY" is true. But it also makes sense. It explains how Great Britain and the USA have come to dominate the world so. It is nothing to do with being chosen by some God, or serendipity, and everything to do with manipulation, fraud, murder and genocide.
Hence the inverted, incomplete and irregular pentagram directly to the North of the White House.
It doesn't matter if the people with this power to create money claim to be Jews, Hindus, or Martians. What they have done is just plain WRONG! When you understand what they have done (and I urge readers, particularly readers with interests in "secret history", to read all the aforementioned books and authors) then you see through these self-appointed money masters. You see through their manipulating and lying.
As with all things it's taking that first step into the unknown. I was apprehensive at first, for I couldn't quite believe that what was alleged could ever be concealed.
But can you guess who owns the news outlets and publishers? clue: they can create lot and lots of money to buy news outlets and publishers.
Can you also guess who tempts politicians with cushy posts as advisors and consultants? clue: they can create lot and lots of money to own corporations and think tanks who can employ powerful politicians after office.
Take that first step today.
Sunday, April 16, 2006
THE SEQUENCE OF EVENTS (a brief intro to British Foreign Policy in the Middle East)
1. create and control a nasty, terrorist strain of Islam through an agent called Hempher
2. create and sustain a colony within Islamic territory for Jews (Israel), leading to anger within Muslim community and young, angry men and women joining this nasty strain of Islam
3. arm that colony (Israel) with nukes
4. have your terrorists make a number of attacks on this colony over the years so they get a name for themselves
5. then run a false-flag op on your soil, have your terrorists blamed for the terrorism, and invade the region
6. create a furore over a country seeking a peaceful nuclear power process (Iran)
7. invade said country (Iran) to stop it from producing nukes
8. said country (Iran) then attacks the colony (Israel)
9. the colony (Israel) then nukes said country (Iran)
10. RUN A LONG, GLOBAL WAR INVOLVING NUKES, BIO'S, CHEM'S and TERROR
11. when war ends form a totalitarian world government to stop wars that you created
This is the sequence of events I see happening. Do you see how long range this has been? Hempher created Wahhabism in the early 19th Century, 200 years ago! It may go back further than that to the beginning of Islam.
When I talk of 'Britain' and 'British' I do not mean the British people. I refer to an elite based in London who control Britain from behind the scenes and are after control of the whole world. Previous attempts at world government have been The League of Nations and The United Nations.
Is it natural to want to rule the world? Possibly. If someone came up to me and said, "Here you go, dude. Take control of the world", I wouldn't say no. If I ruled the world it would be very much different to what it is today.
But am I prepared to kill people for it? NO.
But I can guess that some people 1) do want to rule the world and enslave everybody, and 2) are prepared to kill, kill, kill to achieve that goal.
But what sort of psychological make-up would such a group of people have?
I will bring to your attention the inverted, irregular and incomplete pentagram to the north of The White House in Washington DC.
If they can put that there then they mean business. Big, bloody, warmongering, terrorist business.
HAPPY EASTER!
I
2. create and sustain a colony within Islamic territory for Jews (Israel), leading to anger within Muslim community and young, angry men and women joining this nasty strain of Islam
3. arm that colony (Israel) with nukes
4. have your terrorists make a number of attacks on this colony over the years so they get a name for themselves
5. then run a false-flag op on your soil, have your terrorists blamed for the terrorism, and invade the region
6. create a furore over a country seeking a peaceful nuclear power process (Iran)
7. invade said country (Iran) to stop it from producing nukes
8. said country (Iran) then attacks the colony (Israel)
9. the colony (Israel) then nukes said country (Iran)
10. RUN A LONG, GLOBAL WAR INVOLVING NUKES, BIO'S, CHEM'S and TERROR
11. when war ends form a totalitarian world government to stop wars that you created
This is the sequence of events I see happening. Do you see how long range this has been? Hempher created Wahhabism in the early 19th Century, 200 years ago! It may go back further than that to the beginning of Islam.
When I talk of 'Britain' and 'British' I do not mean the British people. I refer to an elite based in London who control Britain from behind the scenes and are after control of the whole world. Previous attempts at world government have been The League of Nations and The United Nations.
Is it natural to want to rule the world? Possibly. If someone came up to me and said, "Here you go, dude. Take control of the world", I wouldn't say no. If I ruled the world it would be very much different to what it is today.
But am I prepared to kill people for it? NO.
But I can guess that some people 1) do want to rule the world and enslave everybody, and 2) are prepared to kill, kill, kill to achieve that goal.
But what sort of psychological make-up would such a group of people have?
I will bring to your attention the inverted, irregular and incomplete pentagram to the north of The White House in Washington DC.
If they can put that there then they mean business. Big, bloody, warmongering, terrorist business.
HAPPY EASTER!
I
Friday, April 14, 2006
AN EXPERIMENT WITH MICROWAVED WATER
This picture is taken from http://www.execonn.com/sf/ which describes a science fair project. After 9 days of watering the plant being gien microwaved water is dead, while the plpant given boiled water is very much alive! It shows what could be happening inside our bodies right now, and also could explain the increase in the use of microwaves for telecommunication. Microwaves are extremely dangerous to the human body. The brain is particularly susceptible to influence from microwaves. When the latest military/police communication system TETRA was trialed the participants reported feelings of lack of awareness and aggression. This is not surprising. The CIA were experimenting with microwaves on people in the 1970's and similar results were reported.
Thursday, April 13, 2006
A PRIMER IN CONSPIRALOONACY (and it's lizard-free!)
"Give me control of a nation's currency and I care not who makes the laws".
This quotation is attributed to Mayer Amschel Rothschild. He had five sons and one was sent to each of London, Paris, Vienna, Naples and Frankfurt, and they each opened a bank. They coordinated their lending policies. The son who came to London, Nathan, ripped off the stock brokers of London during the Battle of Waterloo and made a fortune, virtually buying up all British government bonds at a fraction of their true value after he pretended that Wellington had lost while already knowing that Wellington had in fact won. With this fortune Nathan bought out the then privately-owned Bank of England in 1825, and since then the Rothschilds have been directing British domestic and foreign policies. They controlled the issuance of the British currency. They could decide how much money was in circulation. But more importantly they could create money for whoever they wanted through a system of banking called Fractional Reserve Banking. This system allows the Rothschilds, and bankers in general, to simply create money with a stroke of a pen. They can create money for themselves, their friends and cronies, for dictators and for wars, while we must work, work, work leaving little time for anything else.
So with all this power to create money, what do you do with it? Research cancer and methods for stopping it? Abolish poverty and hunger? Or do you fund a couple of dictators and world wars?
Well, we still have a charity for cancer research, and suffered Hitler and Stalin and fought two world wars, each leading to an attempt at world government!
The 19th Century is known as The Age of Rothschild. Through the coordinated policies of their Rothschild family banks, and their control of central banks such as The Bank of England (the banks which issued the national currency), they were the financiers of the British, French and German empires. They also tried to gain control of the USA through several attempts at creating a privately-owned bank, even creating the 1861 Civil War. Each succesful attempt only lasted a handful of years before the American people understood what a Rothschild-controlled-and-owned central bank does; it serves the Rothschilds and not the people. In 1913 they finally got their privately-owned central bank in the form of The Federal Reserve after years of plunging the US economy from boom to bust and paying agents to lobby for the need for a central bank to stop the economic chaos they were in fact creating! This trick is called The Hegelian Dialectic. Create a problem, manage the reaction, and implement the solution. It's basically creating an excuse to do what you want. [For example, say one country's government wants to invade another country but does not have a reasonable enough excuse for the public to support the invasion. Waddya do? Howzabout set up a bunch of patsies, have them hijack a couple of planes on a particular day and arrange several simulations of terrorist attacks for that same day(just like Cheney did), then have your air force stand down, and in the confusion allow the patsies to fly into a few important buildings? (Check out Operation Northwoods). Your public are then baying for blood and you can invade wherever you say the culprits came from!]
Edward VII isolated Germany, creating a series of treaties and gentleman's agreements with the powers of The Congress of Vienna. A British Intelligence network called Young Europe, with Freemasonry, assassinated Archduke Ferdinand. The Archduke himself knew that Freemasonry wanted him dead, and it was also known in certain Freemasonic circles that the Archduke was going to be shot dead. Freemasonry is run from Freemasons Hall, London (where BBC series "Spooks" was made). The British then pretended to mediate for peace between Austria and Serbia, and told Germany it would not get involved in any war. Germany had previously shown that it would back down at the potential for conflict with Britain. So with Britain indicating that it would not involve itself in the conflict Germany encouraged Austria to pursue a military solution. So Austria, with support from Germany, declared war and the treaties and agreements arranged by Edward VII then began to fall into place, and countries took sides. As soon as Germany invaded Belgium as part the Schlieffen Plan to take out Paris the British then cited an obscure treaty with Belgium and joined the Great War. Britain had already sent its Expeditionary Force with supplies in anticipation of this move by Germany. Thus Germany and Austria were tricked into aggression by Britain. But by 1916 the Allies were in financial trouble. The USA and its newly created Federal Reserve couldn't lend the Allies money because the USA had not formally declared war. The war was 3000 miles away and the American public had no stomach for it. So The Lusitania was allowed to be sunk by Germany (when Churchill was in charge of the Navy) while it was carrying American passengers and illegally carrying ammunition. The USA went wild and formally joined the war in 1917. Germany didn't stand a chance and a year later the war ended. This then led to the Treaty of Versailles which labelled Germany as the aggressor and ordered Germany to pay enormous war reparations. The first attempt at a World Governnment was made with The League of Nations. Its HQ was donated by the Rockefellers, co-conspirators and fellow central bankers with the Rothschilds via their shares in the privately-owned Federal Reserve. The enormous demand for money during the war from The Federal Reserve from the Allies then allowed the likes of the Rothschilds and Rockefellers to create lots and lots of money which fed the 1920's boom. But in Germany Wall Street banks also created the cartels such as IG Farben which would come to dominate the German war industries. Kaiser Wilhem II was told by a Freemason that Freemasonry i.e. Britain, wanted to destroy the central european powers.
The League of Nations failed because the USA voted out of it. In order to help persuade the USA that it should join a world government The Royal Institute of International Affairs was created in Britain, and its sister The Council on Foreign Relations in the USA. Since then all Presidents of the USA have been members of the CFR. The League of Nations had been sold as the answer to all man's problems caused by World War 1. In order to create another World Government which would survive, a longer and bloodier war was required.
So Hitler was financed by Wall Street into power. A patsy was blamed for the Reichstag Fire and Hitler assumed total control. American industries collaborated with Germany to build its war industries. Rockefellers gave IG Farben the patents to manufacture synthetic oil and rubber, absolutely necessary for a mobile land war machine. Germany had little access to either. Rockefeller also financed the racial and mental hygiene studies in Berlin. Ford built tanks. The list is endless. Hitler was allowed to rebuild Germany specifically for war. The Treaty of Versailles had reduced Germany's defences to virtually nil, but in the space of 15 years, and despite Hitler's demands for expansion, he was allowed by the Allies to rebuild the Wehrmacht. He invaded France, Austria, Czechoslovakia and finally Poland. He was reclaiming what the Treaty of Versailles had taken away. This was all set out in the Nazi Party manifesto, which is why he received substantial Wall Street support because Wall Street wanted another terrible war. Britain then declares war to defend Poland and the Rothschild crony Churchill is appointed PM.
Regarding ideologies, Hitler's enemy was Communism. Russia had been under attack from Great Britain since the mid 19th Century. Young Russia, controlled from London, was created for terrorism within Russia. Derivatives of Young Russia made several assassination attempts on the Tsar and his officials and succeeded. Communism, like Islamic Fundamentalism, was fostered in London. The Communist Party was created in London, with Marx and Engels being paid to write the manifesto. The 1848 revolutions were controlled from London and run out of Freemasonic lodges. In 1905 a revolution financed by Rothschild agent Schiff failed. But in 1917 The Bolshevik Revolution was successful at overthrowing the Russian monarchy. We associate this revolution with Lenin and Trotsky. Lenin was sent into Russia in a sealed train by Germany with "the Rothschild gold", or rather an element within Germany working for the Rothschilds, namely Freemason and Rothschild-cousin Bethmann-Hollweg. Trotsky was living it up in New York and set sail for Russia. He was stopped en route in Canada suspected of being a German agent, but was released with the help of British and American miilitary officials. Once in Russia Lenin and Trotsky were supervised by British Agent Bruce Lockhart and the American Raymond Robins. It was MI6 agent Captain George Hill who created the Cheka to destroy the counter-revolution so that the Bolsheviks would retain control. Schiff and others from the Rothschild circle later admitted to financing the Bolsheviks. They were rewarded with juicy contracts for natural resources and industrial and military development. Thus Wall Street and the City of London created and built Communist Russia.
So from the start the Soviet Empire had been helped into creation by Wall Street and the City of London. Similarly for Nazi Germany. These two fight. Pearl Harbour was 1) provoked, and 2) allowed to happen, thus bringing the USA into the war. During the war the factories of Wall Street subsids in Germany were not bombed. Several suggestions from Abwehr Chief Admiral Canaris that he hand Hitler over to the Allies were refused. Both of these actions allowed the war to go on and on, leading to more death and destruction, and increasing the likelihood that a world government would be accepted aferwards by the survivors.
So after nearly six years of yet another world war the world was ready to accept a world government; The United Nations. And again, the Rockefellers donated the HQ for this world government, which ironically is on the grounds of a former slaughterhouse.
The UN has since been gradually assuming more and more control over governments.
Intermediate supernational organizations are growing in influence; NATO is in Afghanistan and is now being sent to Africa. The EU and NAFTA are creating virtual governments and expanding. Once our governments have ceded more control to the likes of the EU and NATO then it will be much easier for the EU etc to cede total control to the UN.
And who housed the UN? The Rockefellers.
And who financed the Rockefellers? The Rothschilds.
Both are major shareholders in The Federal Reserve, with the Rothschilds having more control.
This has all been financed by the banking system known as Fractional Reserve Banking which allows the banks to create paper and electronic money that did not exist and lend it out as if it was backed by some precious metal, when it is not. In return the bankers want your car, your house, your country, your world and ultimately you in debt slavery. They currently hold the 3rd world in debt slavery and are now after you.
Do you get it now?
First, understand what Fractional Reserve Banking is, and then ask the Bank of England if such a banking system is in operation.
But also ask yourself; if they are prepared to have millions and millions of men, women and children die in world wars, and from hunger and starvation due to a debt they don't really owe, how hard is it for them to order a terrorist attack on London, or Washington and New York? (Remember Londonistan and Hempher)
This quotation is attributed to Mayer Amschel Rothschild. He had five sons and one was sent to each of London, Paris, Vienna, Naples and Frankfurt, and they each opened a bank. They coordinated their lending policies. The son who came to London, Nathan, ripped off the stock brokers of London during the Battle of Waterloo and made a fortune, virtually buying up all British government bonds at a fraction of their true value after he pretended that Wellington had lost while already knowing that Wellington had in fact won. With this fortune Nathan bought out the then privately-owned Bank of England in 1825, and since then the Rothschilds have been directing British domestic and foreign policies. They controlled the issuance of the British currency. They could decide how much money was in circulation. But more importantly they could create money for whoever they wanted through a system of banking called Fractional Reserve Banking. This system allows the Rothschilds, and bankers in general, to simply create money with a stroke of a pen. They can create money for themselves, their friends and cronies, for dictators and for wars, while we must work, work, work leaving little time for anything else.
So with all this power to create money, what do you do with it? Research cancer and methods for stopping it? Abolish poverty and hunger? Or do you fund a couple of dictators and world wars?
Well, we still have a charity for cancer research, and suffered Hitler and Stalin and fought two world wars, each leading to an attempt at world government!
The 19th Century is known as The Age of Rothschild. Through the coordinated policies of their Rothschild family banks, and their control of central banks such as The Bank of England (the banks which issued the national currency), they were the financiers of the British, French and German empires. They also tried to gain control of the USA through several attempts at creating a privately-owned bank, even creating the 1861 Civil War. Each succesful attempt only lasted a handful of years before the American people understood what a Rothschild-controlled-and-owned central bank does; it serves the Rothschilds and not the people. In 1913 they finally got their privately-owned central bank in the form of The Federal Reserve after years of plunging the US economy from boom to bust and paying agents to lobby for the need for a central bank to stop the economic chaos they were in fact creating! This trick is called The Hegelian Dialectic. Create a problem, manage the reaction, and implement the solution. It's basically creating an excuse to do what you want. [For example, say one country's government wants to invade another country but does not have a reasonable enough excuse for the public to support the invasion. Waddya do? Howzabout set up a bunch of patsies, have them hijack a couple of planes on a particular day and arrange several simulations of terrorist attacks for that same day(just like Cheney did), then have your air force stand down, and in the confusion allow the patsies to fly into a few important buildings? (Check out Operation Northwoods). Your public are then baying for blood and you can invade wherever you say the culprits came from!]
Edward VII isolated Germany, creating a series of treaties and gentleman's agreements with the powers of The Congress of Vienna. A British Intelligence network called Young Europe, with Freemasonry, assassinated Archduke Ferdinand. The Archduke himself knew that Freemasonry wanted him dead, and it was also known in certain Freemasonic circles that the Archduke was going to be shot dead. Freemasonry is run from Freemasons Hall, London (where BBC series "Spooks" was made). The British then pretended to mediate for peace between Austria and Serbia, and told Germany it would not get involved in any war. Germany had previously shown that it would back down at the potential for conflict with Britain. So with Britain indicating that it would not involve itself in the conflict Germany encouraged Austria to pursue a military solution. So Austria, with support from Germany, declared war and the treaties and agreements arranged by Edward VII then began to fall into place, and countries took sides. As soon as Germany invaded Belgium as part the Schlieffen Plan to take out Paris the British then cited an obscure treaty with Belgium and joined the Great War. Britain had already sent its Expeditionary Force with supplies in anticipation of this move by Germany. Thus Germany and Austria were tricked into aggression by Britain. But by 1916 the Allies were in financial trouble. The USA and its newly created Federal Reserve couldn't lend the Allies money because the USA had not formally declared war. The war was 3000 miles away and the American public had no stomach for it. So The Lusitania was allowed to be sunk by Germany (when Churchill was in charge of the Navy) while it was carrying American passengers and illegally carrying ammunition. The USA went wild and formally joined the war in 1917. Germany didn't stand a chance and a year later the war ended. This then led to the Treaty of Versailles which labelled Germany as the aggressor and ordered Germany to pay enormous war reparations. The first attempt at a World Governnment was made with The League of Nations. Its HQ was donated by the Rockefellers, co-conspirators and fellow central bankers with the Rothschilds via their shares in the privately-owned Federal Reserve. The enormous demand for money during the war from The Federal Reserve from the Allies then allowed the likes of the Rothschilds and Rockefellers to create lots and lots of money which fed the 1920's boom. But in Germany Wall Street banks also created the cartels such as IG Farben which would come to dominate the German war industries. Kaiser Wilhem II was told by a Freemason that Freemasonry i.e. Britain, wanted to destroy the central european powers.
The League of Nations failed because the USA voted out of it. In order to help persuade the USA that it should join a world government The Royal Institute of International Affairs was created in Britain, and its sister The Council on Foreign Relations in the USA. Since then all Presidents of the USA have been members of the CFR. The League of Nations had been sold as the answer to all man's problems caused by World War 1. In order to create another World Government which would survive, a longer and bloodier war was required.
So Hitler was financed by Wall Street into power. A patsy was blamed for the Reichstag Fire and Hitler assumed total control. American industries collaborated with Germany to build its war industries. Rockefellers gave IG Farben the patents to manufacture synthetic oil and rubber, absolutely necessary for a mobile land war machine. Germany had little access to either. Rockefeller also financed the racial and mental hygiene studies in Berlin. Ford built tanks. The list is endless. Hitler was allowed to rebuild Germany specifically for war. The Treaty of Versailles had reduced Germany's defences to virtually nil, but in the space of 15 years, and despite Hitler's demands for expansion, he was allowed by the Allies to rebuild the Wehrmacht. He invaded France, Austria, Czechoslovakia and finally Poland. He was reclaiming what the Treaty of Versailles had taken away. This was all set out in the Nazi Party manifesto, which is why he received substantial Wall Street support because Wall Street wanted another terrible war. Britain then declares war to defend Poland and the Rothschild crony Churchill is appointed PM.
Regarding ideologies, Hitler's enemy was Communism. Russia had been under attack from Great Britain since the mid 19th Century. Young Russia, controlled from London, was created for terrorism within Russia. Derivatives of Young Russia made several assassination attempts on the Tsar and his officials and succeeded. Communism, like Islamic Fundamentalism, was fostered in London. The Communist Party was created in London, with Marx and Engels being paid to write the manifesto. The 1848 revolutions were controlled from London and run out of Freemasonic lodges. In 1905 a revolution financed by Rothschild agent Schiff failed. But in 1917 The Bolshevik Revolution was successful at overthrowing the Russian monarchy. We associate this revolution with Lenin and Trotsky. Lenin was sent into Russia in a sealed train by Germany with "the Rothschild gold", or rather an element within Germany working for the Rothschilds, namely Freemason and Rothschild-cousin Bethmann-Hollweg. Trotsky was living it up in New York and set sail for Russia. He was stopped en route in Canada suspected of being a German agent, but was released with the help of British and American miilitary officials. Once in Russia Lenin and Trotsky were supervised by British Agent Bruce Lockhart and the American Raymond Robins. It was MI6 agent Captain George Hill who created the Cheka to destroy the counter-revolution so that the Bolsheviks would retain control. Schiff and others from the Rothschild circle later admitted to financing the Bolsheviks. They were rewarded with juicy contracts for natural resources and industrial and military development. Thus Wall Street and the City of London created and built Communist Russia.
So from the start the Soviet Empire had been helped into creation by Wall Street and the City of London. Similarly for Nazi Germany. These two fight. Pearl Harbour was 1) provoked, and 2) allowed to happen, thus bringing the USA into the war. During the war the factories of Wall Street subsids in Germany were not bombed. Several suggestions from Abwehr Chief Admiral Canaris that he hand Hitler over to the Allies were refused. Both of these actions allowed the war to go on and on, leading to more death and destruction, and increasing the likelihood that a world government would be accepted aferwards by the survivors.
So after nearly six years of yet another world war the world was ready to accept a world government; The United Nations. And again, the Rockefellers donated the HQ for this world government, which ironically is on the grounds of a former slaughterhouse.
The UN has since been gradually assuming more and more control over governments.
Intermediate supernational organizations are growing in influence; NATO is in Afghanistan and is now being sent to Africa. The EU and NAFTA are creating virtual governments and expanding. Once our governments have ceded more control to the likes of the EU and NATO then it will be much easier for the EU etc to cede total control to the UN.
And who housed the UN? The Rockefellers.
And who financed the Rockefellers? The Rothschilds.
Both are major shareholders in The Federal Reserve, with the Rothschilds having more control.
This has all been financed by the banking system known as Fractional Reserve Banking which allows the banks to create paper and electronic money that did not exist and lend it out as if it was backed by some precious metal, when it is not. In return the bankers want your car, your house, your country, your world and ultimately you in debt slavery. They currently hold the 3rd world in debt slavery and are now after you.
Do you get it now?
First, understand what Fractional Reserve Banking is, and then ask the Bank of England if such a banking system is in operation.
But also ask yourself; if they are prepared to have millions and millions of men, women and children die in world wars, and from hunger and starvation due to a debt they don't really owe, how hard is it for them to order a terrorist attack on London, or Washington and New York? (Remember Londonistan and Hempher)
Wednesday, April 12, 2006
FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE SOUGHT
Are there any wealthy anti-NWOers out there willing to help me financially to train to become a lawyer?
I have reached a crossroads in my life and am wondering which way to go; law or something else. This is probably the last crossroads in my life and therefore probably the last chance I will get to become a lawyer, except if I win the Lottery. I have applied to enter Law School and am receiving offers now, having applied late. I'm seeing my bank soon about a large loan they do for these kind of studies, but even if I get it I think that will still not be enough. It's so bloody expensive, particularly to study at the award-winning respected institutions.
What I need is a Labour-Party type loan; one that may never require paying back, or at least not for a while for it will take four years to qualify. I'm sorry but I cannot offer any peerages, only someone who will understand the NWO and be prepared to fight them in their courts.
I have reached a crossroads in my life and am wondering which way to go; law or something else. This is probably the last crossroads in my life and therefore probably the last chance I will get to become a lawyer, except if I win the Lottery. I have applied to enter Law School and am receiving offers now, having applied late. I'm seeing my bank soon about a large loan they do for these kind of studies, but even if I get it I think that will still not be enough. It's so bloody expensive, particularly to study at the award-winning respected institutions.
What I need is a Labour-Party type loan; one that may never require paying back, or at least not for a while for it will take four years to qualify. I'm sorry but I cannot offer any peerages, only someone who will understand the NWO and be prepared to fight them in their courts.
Tuesday, April 11, 2006
DID CHENEY GIVE IRAN "THE BOMB"?
Greg Szymanski is reporting that in 1991 a B52 went 'missing' in Iran with nukes on board! The US Defence Secretary at the time was none other than Dick Cheney. However Cheney failed to report the missing B52 and its nukes.
Tuesday, April 04, 2006
THE USUAL SUSPECT ON THE WAR PATH AGAIN
Rupert Murdoch's The Sun is at it again. Before the invasion of Iraq it was The Sun with headlines such as "45 Minutes From Doom" and "He's Got 'Em. Let's Get Him". And after 3 years of invading Iraq the weapons to which The Sun was referring have still not been found (though there are some who will say that they were somehow smuggled into Syria under the watchful eyes of the US spy satellites).
Today we read Israeli (surprise, surprise) sources telling The Sun that Iran will be nuclear by 2007 and that therefore sanctions will not have time to work so a military strike is the only option.
From http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2006150433,00.html
Well, I trust Hans Blix, who says Iran is at least five years away from a bomb. Blix said Iraq had no WMD, and it turned out that way.
From http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory?id=1800396
I have stated here that the USA, or rather the criminal element within the USA who ran the 9/11 op, cannot hang about on Iran because the 9/11 Truth Movement is really starting to break through, with Alex Jones appearing on CNN and MTV and making good arguments, referring to persons of standing who support the thesis that 9/11 was a government op. A strike on Iran, as reported on Sunday and here, would inevitably lead to more terrorism in the USA, and would thus allow this criminal element to openly implement a Police State a la Nazi Germany (which is the whole point). To add to this list of notable persons who believe 9/11 was an inside job we can now add Dr Robert M Bowman, who was head of the US Star Wars missile defense program. He has now come out and named Cheney as the prime suspect.
From http://www.propagandamatrix.com/articles/april2006/040406mainsuspect.htm
Hold on tight. 2006 is going to be a rough ride!
Today we read Israeli (surprise, surprise) sources telling The Sun that Iran will be nuclear by 2007 and that therefore sanctions will not have time to work so a military strike is the only option.
From http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2006150433,00.html
By TOM NEWTON DUNN
Defence Editor
IRAN’S nuclear bomb plans will be unstoppable by 2007, it emerged last night.
The shock forecast puts massive pressure on Tony Blair and US President George Bush to solve the growing security crisis.
And it dramatically increases the chances of an American air strike against the rogue Islamic state.
Israeli officials revealed yesterday that Iran will have completed work on key machinery needed to build nukes by early next year.
One said: “Iran is racing to the point of no return. Action needs to be taken as soon as possible.”
Western leaders fear the bomb-building plan could plunge the Middle East into World War Three.
Diplomatic attempts to persuade the Ayatollahs to abandon it have been bogged down by rows with Russia and China.
Previously it was thought Iran was at least two years away from being able to build a nuclear weapon.
But intelligence has shown that Iranian scientists are just months from perfecting the equipment to enrich uranium — the vital ingredient for a bomb.
Well, I trust Hans Blix, who says Iran is at least five years away from a bomb. Blix said Iraq had no WMD, and it turned out that way.
From http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory?id=1800396
OSLO, Norway Apr 3, 2006 (AP)— Former U.N. chief weapons inspector Hans Blix said Monday that Iran is a least five years away from developing a nuclear bomb, leaving time to peacefully negotiate a settlement.
Blix, attending an energy conference in western Norway, said he doubted the U.S. would resort to invading Iran.
"But there is a chance that the U.S. will use bombs or missiles against several sites in Iran," he was quoted by Norwegian news agency NTB as saying. "Then, the reactions would be strong, and would contribute to increased terrorism."
Blix said there is still time for dialogue over Iran's nuclear enrichment program, which Tehran insists is for peaceful purposes but the West fears is part of a secret nuclear weapons program.
"We have time on our side in this case. Iran can't have a bomb ready in the next five years," Blix was quoted as saying.
I have stated here that the USA, or rather the criminal element within the USA who ran the 9/11 op, cannot hang about on Iran because the 9/11 Truth Movement is really starting to break through, with Alex Jones appearing on CNN and MTV and making good arguments, referring to persons of standing who support the thesis that 9/11 was a government op. A strike on Iran, as reported on Sunday and here, would inevitably lead to more terrorism in the USA, and would thus allow this criminal element to openly implement a Police State a la Nazi Germany (which is the whole point). To add to this list of notable persons who believe 9/11 was an inside job we can now add Dr Robert M Bowman, who was head of the US Star Wars missile defense program. He has now come out and named Cheney as the prime suspect.
From http://www.propagandamatrix.com/articles/april2006/040406mainsuspect.htm
The former head of the Star Wars missile defense program under Presidents Ford and Carter has gone public to say that the official version of 9/11 is a conspiracy theory and his main suspect for the architect of the attack is Vice President Dick Cheney.
Dr. Robert M. Bowman, Lt. Col., USAF, ret. flew 101 combat missions in Vietnam. He is the recipient of the Eisenhower Medal, the George F. Kennan Peace Prize, the President’s Medal of Veterans for Peace, the Society of Military Engineers Gold Medal (twice), six Air Medals, and dozens of other awards and honors. His Ph.D. is in Aeronautics and Nuclear Engineering from Caltech. He chaired 8 major international conferences, and is one of the country’s foremost experts on National Security.
Bowman worked secretly for the US government on the Star Wars project and was the first to coin the very term in a 1977 secret memo. After Bowman realized that the program was only ever intended to be used as an aggressive and not defensive tool, as part of a plan to initiate a nuclear war with the Soviets, he left the program and campaigned against it.
In an interview with The Alex Jones Show aired nationally on the GCN Radio Network, Bowman (pictured below) stated that at the bare minimum if Osama bin Laden and Al-Qaeda were involved in 9/11 then the government stood down and allowed the attacks to happen. He said it is plausible that the entire chain of military command were unaware of what was taking place and were used as tools by the people pulling the strings behind the attack.
Bowman outlined how the drills on the morning of 9/11 that simulated planes crashing into buildings on the east coast were used as a cover to dupe unwitting air defense personnel into not responding quickly enough to stop the attack.
"The exercises that went on that morning simulating the exact kind of thing that was happening so confused the people in the FAA and NORAD....that they didn't they didn't know what was real and what was part of the exercise," said Bowman
"I think the people who planned and carried out those exercises, they're the ones that should be the object of investigation."
Asked if he could name a prime suspect who was the likely architect behind the attacks, Bowman stated, "If I had to narrow it down to one person....I think my prime suspect would be Dick Cheney."
Bowman said that privately his military fighter pilot peers and colleagues did not disagree with his sentiments about the real story behind 9/11.
Bowman agreed that the US was in danger of slipping into a dictatorship and stated, "I think there's been nothing closer to fascism than what we've seen lately from this government."
Bowman slammed the Patriot Act as having, "Done more to destroy the rights of Americans than all of our enemies combined."
Bowman trashed the 9/11 Commission as a politically motivated cover-up with abounding conflicts of interest, charging, "The 9/11 Commission omitted anything that might be the least bit suspicious or embarrassing or in any way detract from the official conspiracy so it was a total whitewash."
"There needs to be a true investigation, not the kind of sham investigations we have had with the 9/11 omission and all the rest of that junk," said Bowman.
Asked if the perpetrators of 9/11 were preparing to stage another false-flag attack to reinvigorate their agenda Bowman agreed that, "I can see that and I hope they can't pull it off, I hope they are prevented from pulling it off but I know darn good and well they'd like to have another one."
A mainstay of the attack pieces against Charlie Sheen have been that he is not credible enough to speak on the topic of 9/11. These charges are ridiculed by the fact that Sheen is an expert on 9/11 who spends hours a day meticulously researching the topic, something that the attack dogs have failed to do, aiming their comments solely at Sheen's personal life and ignoring his invitation to challenge him on the facts.
In addition, from the very start we have put forth eminently credible individuals only for them to be ignored by the establishment media. Physics Professors, former White House advisors and CIA analysts, the father of Reaganomics, German Defense Ministers and Bush's former Secretary of the Treasury, have all gone public on 9/11 but have been uniformly ignored by the majority of the establishment press.
Will Robert Bowman also be blackballed as the mainstream continue to misrepresent the 9/11 truth movement as an occupation of the fringe minority?
Bowman is currently running for Congress in Florida's 15th District.
Hold on tight. 2006 is going to be a rough ride!
Sunday, April 02, 2006
WHO SAYS SUNDAYS ARE BORING?
The Sunday Telegraph is reporting that the government is going to hold talks with the “Defence Chiefs” about an Offensive military strike on Iran.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/04/02/wiran02.xml&sSheet=/portal/2006/04/02/ixportaltop.html
The Washington Post is reporting that “experts” are warning that if attacked Iran is likely to retaliate through terrorism, in Iraq, Europe and the USA. They believe that these Iranian-backed terrorists are better organized and financed than the al-Qaeda outfit who brought us 9/11!
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/01/AR2006040100981.html
The Observer is reporting the shock-horror concession in the narrative of events that Iraq was a factor in the London 7/7 bombings of last year.
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,,1745085,00.html
The New York Times is reporting that Iraq is indeed splitting along religious lines, as predicted by myself and others, with people living in mixed religion areas leaving for the safety of areas dominated by their religion.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/02/world/middleeast/02iraq.html?hp&ex=1144036800&en=f8918f6ac70104fb&ei=5094&partner=homepage
So what is Blair doing? While the NHS is crumbling, strikes over pensions, calls for him to go soon, society becoming more unequal, sex, drink and drugs everywhere, and with official warnings that war breeds terrorism from his own investigation (shock, horror), Blair is flying around the world asking for a global war!
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/04/02/wiran02.xml&sSheet=/portal/2006/04/02/ixportaltop.html
The Washington Post is reporting that “experts” are warning that if attacked Iran is likely to retaliate through terrorism, in Iraq, Europe and the USA. They believe that these Iranian-backed terrorists are better organized and financed than the al-Qaeda outfit who brought us 9/11!
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/01/AR2006040100981.html
The Observer is reporting the shock-horror concession in the narrative of events that Iraq was a factor in the London 7/7 bombings of last year.
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,,1745085,00.html
The New York Times is reporting that Iraq is indeed splitting along religious lines, as predicted by myself and others, with people living in mixed religion areas leaving for the safety of areas dominated by their religion.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/02/world/middleeast/02iraq.html?hp&ex=1144036800&en=f8918f6ac70104fb&ei=5094&partner=homepage
So what is Blair doing? While the NHS is crumbling, strikes over pensions, calls for him to go soon, society becoming more unequal, sex, drink and drugs everywhere, and with official warnings that war breeds terrorism from his own investigation (shock, horror), Blair is flying around the world asking for a global war!
MESSAGES IN MICHAEL BAY'S FILM "PEARL HARBOR"?
Before "Pearl Harbor" was filmed the producers said they wanted to make the film as close to real life as possible, but to also use some artistic licence.
But why would anyone want to make a film of the Pearl Harbour attack, particularly a romantic film? I believe that it has something to do with the year in which it was released, 2001. A "new Pearl Harbour" occured on 11th September of that year when several planes flew into the WTC, and something hit the Pentagon, and something hit the ground in Pennsylvania. The phrase "a new Pearl Harbour" was used by PNAC in a document of theirs which called for exactly what the USA is doing now, with war, Iraq, Iran etc etc etc.
I have already identified a potential message in "Pearl Harbor". In real life towards the end of the attack several Curtiss P40's did manage to get airborne and shoot some Japanese planes down. In the film a reference is made to this when the heroes Hartnett and Affleck manage to get airborne in planes with numbers 306 (=3+0+6=9) and 308 (=3+0+8=11). The message is that on 9/11 America would be attacked and retaliate. I need to establish the historical accuracy of this, if 306 and 308 were at Pearl Harbour and if so were they were flown on that day. We also need to ask Bay why he used 306 and 308 in that scene, because there are around 20 different P40s visible during the attack scenes, all with different numbers. 302 appears a lot (a reference to the Pentagon? 302 = 3+0+2 = 5)
You may think this is not a particularly decisive piece of evidence. I would agree, but would add that there is a potential for it to be a message, or even a warning.
So what else is there in the film of "Pearl Harbor"?
OK, Bay said he wanted to make the events of 7th December 1941 as real as possible in the film. When you watch the film see how many numbers of the ships in the harbour you can see. There were, according to official sources, over 100 ships in the harbour. See http://www.navsource.org/Naval/pearl.htm for ship hull numbers. During the attack scenes, and I have watched it many times now with pen and paper at the ready, I can see only one ship hull number. In fact if you watch carefully the hull numbers on all the ships are painted over in steel grey and blanked out. The only hull number you see is 1062. But when you check the navsource link above 1062 is not there. And that's because 1062 was a sub chaser and was not floated until 1943!
So why, if Bay wanted to be so historically accurate, is he blanking out all the ship hull numbers and allowing us to see one ship hull number which was not officially floated until 1943?
Well, 1062 = 1+0+6+2 = 9.
Another 9 to add to the 9 and 11 on the planes Hartnett and Affleck fly in.
But there's more.
After Pearl Harbour America decided to bomb Tokyo in what became known as the Doolittle Raid. In the film the pilots who are forced to land in occupied China return to the USA on a plane with the tail number 17265. This can also be made into 9/11.
17265 = 1/72/65 = 1/9/11 = 11th September 2001.
Again I need to establish the historical accuracy of this. Did the pilots return on a plane with tail number 17265? If not, then why is Bay using that particular number?
This may seem wild and wacky, but Pearl Harbour was the blockbuster of that year.
However another film won more awards that year, "Traffic". That film contains the most blatant message that 9/11 was going to occur that year. There are two scenes in which the foreground is dominated by several boxes, each with 911 stamped on them. YOU CAN'T MISS 'EM!
So put all this together.
The film which walked away from the Oscar's was "Traffic" which contains two scenes with boxes stamped with 911 dominating the scenes.
The blockbuster "Pearl Harbor", said to be historically accurate, uses a ship which had not been built, and had pilots in planes 306 and 308 shooting down Japanese planes.
I would argue that blanking out all ship hull numbers and allowing us to see the hull number of one that had not even been built is way, way beyond "artistic licence", and that there is something going on that should be researched. This I intend to do.
But why would anyone want to make a film of the Pearl Harbour attack, particularly a romantic film? I believe that it has something to do with the year in which it was released, 2001. A "new Pearl Harbour" occured on 11th September of that year when several planes flew into the WTC, and something hit the Pentagon, and something hit the ground in Pennsylvania. The phrase "a new Pearl Harbour" was used by PNAC in a document of theirs which called for exactly what the USA is doing now, with war, Iraq, Iran etc etc etc.
I have already identified a potential message in "Pearl Harbor". In real life towards the end of the attack several Curtiss P40's did manage to get airborne and shoot some Japanese planes down. In the film a reference is made to this when the heroes Hartnett and Affleck manage to get airborne in planes with numbers 306 (=3+0+6=9) and 308 (=3+0+8=11). The message is that on 9/11 America would be attacked and retaliate. I need to establish the historical accuracy of this, if 306 and 308 were at Pearl Harbour and if so were they were flown on that day. We also need to ask Bay why he used 306 and 308 in that scene, because there are around 20 different P40s visible during the attack scenes, all with different numbers. 302 appears a lot (a reference to the Pentagon? 302 = 3+0+2 = 5)
You may think this is not a particularly decisive piece of evidence. I would agree, but would add that there is a potential for it to be a message, or even a warning.
So what else is there in the film of "Pearl Harbor"?
OK, Bay said he wanted to make the events of 7th December 1941 as real as possible in the film. When you watch the film see how many numbers of the ships in the harbour you can see. There were, according to official sources, over 100 ships in the harbour. See http://www.navsource.org/Naval/pearl.htm for ship hull numbers. During the attack scenes, and I have watched it many times now with pen and paper at the ready, I can see only one ship hull number. In fact if you watch carefully the hull numbers on all the ships are painted over in steel grey and blanked out. The only hull number you see is 1062. But when you check the navsource link above 1062 is not there. And that's because 1062 was a sub chaser and was not floated until 1943!
So why, if Bay wanted to be so historically accurate, is he blanking out all the ship hull numbers and allowing us to see one ship hull number which was not officially floated until 1943?
Well, 1062 = 1+0+6+2 = 9.
Another 9 to add to the 9 and 11 on the planes Hartnett and Affleck fly in.
But there's more.
After Pearl Harbour America decided to bomb Tokyo in what became known as the Doolittle Raid. In the film the pilots who are forced to land in occupied China return to the USA on a plane with the tail number 17265. This can also be made into 9/11.
17265 = 1/72/65 = 1/9/11 = 11th September 2001.
Again I need to establish the historical accuracy of this. Did the pilots return on a plane with tail number 17265? If not, then why is Bay using that particular number?
This may seem wild and wacky, but Pearl Harbour was the blockbuster of that year.
However another film won more awards that year, "Traffic". That film contains the most blatant message that 9/11 was going to occur that year. There are two scenes in which the foreground is dominated by several boxes, each with 911 stamped on them. YOU CAN'T MISS 'EM!
So put all this together.
The film which walked away from the Oscar's was "Traffic" which contains two scenes with boxes stamped with 911 dominating the scenes.
The blockbuster "Pearl Harbor", said to be historically accurate, uses a ship which had not been built, and had pilots in planes 306 and 308 shooting down Japanese planes.
I would argue that blanking out all ship hull numbers and allowing us to see the hull number of one that had not even been built is way, way beyond "artistic licence", and that there is something going on that should be researched. This I intend to do.
Saturday, April 01, 2006
WHY DID BRITAIN BRING IRANIAN GUNMEN INTO IRAQ?
The Times is reporting that Britain brought Iranians into Iraq
The full and small article on this needs to be quoted in its entirety to understand the manipulation of a civil war to blamed on Iran that the British are trying to arrange so that yet more pressure can be brought onto Iran. Remember the claims surfacing last year that Iran was meddling in Iraq and supplying infrared devices for roadside bombs. We now know that Iran was brought into Iraq by Britain, and that the infrared devices were put into the terrorist hands via a joint operation between the FBI and MI5 via Kevin Fulton.
From http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,7374-2113630,00.html
The full and small article on this needs to be quoted in its entirety to understand the manipulation of a civil war to blamed on Iran that the British are trying to arrange so that yet more pressure can be brought onto Iran. Remember the claims surfacing last year that Iran was meddling in Iraq and supplying infrared devices for roadside bombs. We now know that Iran was brought into Iraq by Britain, and that the infrared devices were put into the terrorist hands via a joint operation between the FBI and MI5 via Kevin Fulton.
From http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,7374-2113630,00.html
Iranian militiamen were brought in by Britain
By Dominic Kennedy
MILITIAMEN from an Iranian-backed force were deliberately recruited by Britain to join the new Iraqi security services after Saddam Hussein was overthrown, the Government has admitted.
The sectarian Badr organisation, trained in exile by Iran’s Revolutionary Guards, is suspected of violently pursuing its own agenda after being allowed to enlist in national units. John Reid, the Defence Secretary, disclosed in a Commons written answer to the Plaid Cymru MP Adam Price that it had been official policy to welcome the Shia gunmen. “Following the end of the conflict in Iraq, the Coalition Provision Authority sought to reintegrate militia members into civil society,” Mr Reid said. “This process included members of the Badr organisation, formerly known as the Badr Corps, among others.”
Sunnis have accused the Badr organisation of torturing prisoners, a claim rejected by the Shia-dominated Government. Bayar Jabor, the Interior Minister, was a member of the militia. The organisation’s stronghold is southern Iraq, where British troops have been based since the war.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)