While the USA and UK whinge about the much welcomed jailing of Rothschild agent Mikhail Khordokovsky we are killing thousands of Pakistan civilians in non-UN-sanctioned unmanned drone attacks. The US calls these murdered innocent civilians 'suspected militants'. The Pakistanis call them mum, dad, brother, sister, granny, grandad etc.
And we wonder why Muslims of all nationalities want to come here and allegedly blow us up!? Only today Dave "our Dave" Cameron has reminded of this alleged threat (not mentioning that MI5 allowed such terrorists to operate out of London with a Covenant of Security for years).
============================
From http://www.presstv.ir/detail/157975.html
US urged to end Unauthorized strikes
A huge gathering of tribal elders have called for an immediate end to the ongoing non-UN-sanctioned drone attacks in the northwestern Pakistan.
The tribal meeting in northwestern city of Peshawar expressed serious concern over civilian casualties in drone strikes, a Press TV correspondent reported on Thursday. Several prominent leaders of political and Islamic parties also attended the tribal event.
They called on the Islamabad government to strongly condemn the attacks and to quit its alliance with the US in the so-called war on terror.
People from Pakistan's tribal regions hold the US responsible for what they call violation of human rights and massive killings of innocent civilians through the deadly attacks in their regions.
Over 50 people have lost their lives and many more have been wounded in North Waziristan region in recent week.
The unsanctioned US airstrikes in Pakistan have increased since President Barack Obama took office in 2009.
Washington claims its airstrikes target militants who cross the Pakistani border into Afghanistan to help the Taliban fight US-led foreign forces.
However, locals say civilians are the main victims of the non-UN-sanctioned attacks. Thousands of civilians have reportedly been killed in about 200 drone raids over the past six years.
The United Nations says the US-operated drone strikes in Pakistan pose a growing challenge to the international rule of law.
Philip Alston, UN special envoy on extrajudicial killings, said in a report in late October that the attacks were undermining the rules designed to protect the right of life.
Alston also said he feared that the drone killings by the US Central Intelligence Agency could develop a "playstation" mentality.
A recent report by the Brookings Institution says the illegal strikes have taken the lives of 10 civilians for every militant killed.
Islamabad has repeatedly condemned the strikes as a violation of its sovereignty, asserting that such attacks have proved counterproductive in US-led war against terrorism.
JR/MGH
© Copyright 2010 Press TV. All rights reserved.
Friday, December 31, 2010
Thursday, December 30, 2010
THE MAN
The Meteorological Office has been caught red-handed (pardon the pun) again. Despite saying it would not predict the climate for this winter it did. It said it would be mild. It was wrong. Just like last year, and the year before. On every occasion it has been wrong. The reason for this was exposed by The Daily Mail when it reported on the history of who has been in charge of the MO recently.
You could be forgiven for expecting the head of the MO to be a meteorologist, someone who knows about physics and astrophysics and has had years of successful experience of predicting weather and climate.
But in bizzaro world UK, where we bailout out greedy reckless bankers while condemning generations of innocent kids to a lifetime of unbearable poverty and crime, the head of the MO has none of this!
No! In bizarro world UK the head of the MO, while it has been unsuccessfully predicting times of boiling seas and melting lands unless we kill billions of people because they produce too much CO2, has been head of the WWF!
And who created the WWF? NAZI BILDERBERGERS!
So who is 'the man'?
The man is Piers Corbyn. Not much to look at. No sharp suit. No mass media hanging on his every word, like Prince Philip's top mate Al Gore.
But man, can he predict the weather and climate!
He forecast months ago the deep freeze we have experienced, and predicts a mini ice age. This corresponds with the reasons as to why the NWO decided to grab the Middle East and Caspian. They know a long deep freeze is coming and want to control as much oil and gas as possible. Sell it only to the rich and those deemed as slaves, and the rest can perish in the ice and snow, reducing population.
But there's a potential problem.
They can control the oil and gas, and thus drive up their price, but if Russia is not playing ball then Russia can capitalize on the high prices and enrich and educate their people. The same with Iran. No need for IMF bailouts and severe austerity in the form of savage cuts in education and health. Russia and Iran would be self sufficient, and thus independent, and also enriching themselves.
For some strange reason The Guardian does not do Piers Corbyn. It fawns over mass murderer Obama and his Nazi T4 death panels, and defends Rothschild agent and economic rapist Khordokovsky, but when a plain and simple man successfully predicts the seasonal climate, and also predicts global cooling and a mini ice age contrary to the Mockingbird media, then forget it.
You could be forgiven for expecting the head of the MO to be a meteorologist, someone who knows about physics and astrophysics and has had years of successful experience of predicting weather and climate.
But in bizzaro world UK, where we bailout out greedy reckless bankers while condemning generations of innocent kids to a lifetime of unbearable poverty and crime, the head of the MO has none of this!
No! In bizarro world UK the head of the MO, while it has been unsuccessfully predicting times of boiling seas and melting lands unless we kill billions of people because they produce too much CO2, has been head of the WWF!
And who created the WWF? NAZI BILDERBERGERS!
So who is 'the man'?
The man is Piers Corbyn. Not much to look at. No sharp suit. No mass media hanging on his every word, like Prince Philip's top mate Al Gore.
But man, can he predict the weather and climate!
He forecast months ago the deep freeze we have experienced, and predicts a mini ice age. This corresponds with the reasons as to why the NWO decided to grab the Middle East and Caspian. They know a long deep freeze is coming and want to control as much oil and gas as possible. Sell it only to the rich and those deemed as slaves, and the rest can perish in the ice and snow, reducing population.
But there's a potential problem.
They can control the oil and gas, and thus drive up their price, but if Russia is not playing ball then Russia can capitalize on the high prices and enrich and educate their people. The same with Iran. No need for IMF bailouts and severe austerity in the form of savage cuts in education and health. Russia and Iran would be self sufficient, and thus independent, and also enriching themselves.
For some strange reason The Guardian does not do Piers Corbyn. It fawns over mass murderer Obama and his Nazi T4 death panels, and defends Rothschild agent and economic rapist Khordokovsky, but when a plain and simple man successfully predicts the seasonal climate, and also predicts global cooling and a mini ice age contrary to the Mockingbird media, then forget it.
WHAT (OR MORE TO THE POINT WHO) COULD BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DRAMATIC INCREASE IN BIRTH DEFECTS IN FALLUJAH
I have no shame in repeating this article from the Trickyleaks Mockingbird Media asset The Guardian because it shows just how tricky the Mockingbird Media is.
An article to be published in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health will report on the spontaneous abortions, deformations and bias in infant gender in Fallujah after the battles of 2004.
Depleted uranium is suspected.
In Vietnam it was Agent Orange. In Iraq it was DU.
What caused these is up for debate.
What is not is who.
Who is responsible? The USA.
But despite pushing for mass genocide at Copenhagen last year and backing the manmade global warming theory, The Guardian still has to present an air of concern and respectability by reporting on such a devastation of Fallujah, so that the liberal-minded get sucked into the mass genocide agenda, just like Richard Curtis did when he produced that sick, sick, sick video for 10:10 in which schoolkids (and in fact anyone) who did not agree with the bogus theory of manmade global warming were simply blown up. No trial. No questions. BANG! Blood and guts all over the show. It has to. It has to pretend that it cares for you and your family when it (or elements within) cannot wait to see you whither and die so that the human population is down to the level desired by the Nazi Rockefellers and Prince Philip of about 1 billion maximum, but preferably 1/2 billion.
=======================
From http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/dec/30/faulluja-birth-defects-iraq
Research links rise in Falluja birth defects and cancers to US assault
• Defects in newborns 11 times higher than normal
• 'War contaminants' from 2004 attack could be cause
A study examining the causes of a dramatic spike in birth defects in the Iraqi city of Falluja has for the first time concluded that genetic damage could have been caused by weaponry used in US assaults that took place six years ago.
The research, which will be published next week, confirms earlier estimates revealed by the Guardian of a major, unexplained rise in cancers and chronic neural-tube, cardiac and skeletal defects in newborns. The authors found that malformations are close to 11 times higher than normal rates, and rose to unprecedented levels in the first half of this year – a period that had not been surveyed in earlier reports.
An article to be published in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health will report on the spontaneous abortions, deformations and bias in infant gender in Fallujah after the battles of 2004.
Depleted uranium is suspected.
In Vietnam it was Agent Orange. In Iraq it was DU.
What caused these is up for debate.
What is not is who.
Who is responsible? The USA.
But despite pushing for mass genocide at Copenhagen last year and backing the manmade global warming theory, The Guardian still has to present an air of concern and respectability by reporting on such a devastation of Fallujah, so that the liberal-minded get sucked into the mass genocide agenda, just like Richard Curtis did when he produced that sick, sick, sick video for 10:10 in which schoolkids (and in fact anyone) who did not agree with the bogus theory of manmade global warming were simply blown up. No trial. No questions. BANG! Blood and guts all over the show. It has to. It has to pretend that it cares for you and your family when it (or elements within) cannot wait to see you whither and die so that the human population is down to the level desired by the Nazi Rockefellers and Prince Philip of about 1 billion maximum, but preferably 1/2 billion.
=======================
From http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/dec/30/faulluja-birth-defects-iraq
Research links rise in Falluja birth defects and cancers to US assault
• Defects in newborns 11 times higher than normal
• 'War contaminants' from 2004 attack could be cause
A study examining the causes of a dramatic spike in birth defects in the Iraqi city of Falluja has for the first time concluded that genetic damage could have been caused by weaponry used in US assaults that took place six years ago.
The research, which will be published next week, confirms earlier estimates revealed by the Guardian of a major, unexplained rise in cancers and chronic neural-tube, cardiac and skeletal defects in newborns. The authors found that malformations are close to 11 times higher than normal rates, and rose to unprecedented levels in the first half of this year – a period that had not been surveyed in earlier reports.
SO THE USA WANTS LEGAL TRANSPARENCY?
The USA, the same USA that is defending the economic rapist and Rothschild agent Mikhail Khordokovsky, has decided not to assist an investigation into secret CIA prisons in Poland. Rumours of such prisons have been rampant for years, but have not been confirmed.
The United States of Ass-holes (sorry but I've been watching Meet the Fockers recently) could simply deny the allegations and assist the Polish investigation without any hindrance and with all haste and sincerity.
But no.
The USA refuses to cooperate and instead condemns the imprisonment of a Rothschild agent that followed a transparent lawful process.
Shush, you evil Illuminati ass-holes! This is what happens when you raise your ugly head above the inverted, irregular and incomplete pentagram pointing down into the White House!
=============================
From http://rt.com/news/us-poland-cia-prison/
US refuses to co-operate in probe over alleged CIA secret prisons
The US is refusing to help Poland investigate claims of a secret CIA prison, which allegedly operated in the country between 2003 and 2005.
Warsaw prosecutors have spent the past two years looking into the supposed hidden facilities.
Washington's refusal to help was reported by a Polish news agency just days after a Palestinian terror suspect claimed he had been secretly shipped to the country and tortured in one of the prisons.
The United States of Ass-holes (sorry but I've been watching Meet the Fockers recently) could simply deny the allegations and assist the Polish investigation without any hindrance and with all haste and sincerity.
But no.
The USA refuses to cooperate and instead condemns the imprisonment of a Rothschild agent that followed a transparent lawful process.
Shush, you evil Illuminati ass-holes! This is what happens when you raise your ugly head above the inverted, irregular and incomplete pentagram pointing down into the White House!
=============================
From http://rt.com/news/us-poland-cia-prison/
US refuses to co-operate in probe over alleged CIA secret prisons
The US is refusing to help Poland investigate claims of a secret CIA prison, which allegedly operated in the country between 2003 and 2005.
Warsaw prosecutors have spent the past two years looking into the supposed hidden facilities.
Washington's refusal to help was reported by a Polish news agency just days after a Palestinian terror suspect claimed he had been secretly shipped to the country and tortured in one of the prisons.
Tuesday, December 28, 2010
WHAT DOES NATO STAND FOR?
All these years we have been led to believe that NATO was an acronym for North Atlantic Treaty Organisation, when it is actually the NArco Terrorist Organisation.
You see, before NATO invaded Afghanistan the ISI/CIA-funded Taliban had gone out of control and had eradicated the opium crop. This upset the drug pushers...a lot! But then bin Laden, requiring kidney dialysis and hiding in a cave, allegedly managed to take the limeade out of the US military and fly passenger planes into the Pentagon and WTC 1 and 2 (which somehow defied the laws of physics and also brought down WTC7), so NATO invoking Article V invaded Afghanistan, where they say bin Laden was hiding. They said they would publish an extensive dossier proving bin Laden did it and where he was hiding, but they didn't. Anyway, the drug pushers were in luck, for within a few years opium production was back upto record levels, all thanks to NATO, the NArco Terrorist Organisation.
When it comes to NATO you can't believe a word they say. I refer you to the alleged member of the al-Quds brigade of the IRG who was arrested on Christmas Eve on suspicion of smuggling arms from Iran into Afghanistan. Despite all the shouting and screaming from NATO, foaming at the mouth for war on Iran, it turns out that the suspect wasn't a member of the IRG at all! Ooops!
You see, before NATO invaded Afghanistan the ISI/CIA-funded Taliban had gone out of control and had eradicated the opium crop. This upset the drug pushers...a lot! But then bin Laden, requiring kidney dialysis and hiding in a cave, allegedly managed to take the limeade out of the US military and fly passenger planes into the Pentagon and WTC 1 and 2 (which somehow defied the laws of physics and also brought down WTC7), so NATO invoking Article V invaded Afghanistan, where they say bin Laden was hiding. They said they would publish an extensive dossier proving bin Laden did it and where he was hiding, but they didn't. Anyway, the drug pushers were in luck, for within a few years opium production was back upto record levels, all thanks to NATO, the NArco Terrorist Organisation.
If you need muscle to protect your drugs, and nobody else can help, and if you can find them, maybe you can hire...The NATO-Team.
When it comes to NATO you can't believe a word they say. I refer you to the alleged member of the al-Quds brigade of the IRG who was arrested on Christmas Eve on suspicion of smuggling arms from Iran into Afghanistan. Despite all the shouting and screaming from NATO, foaming at the mouth for war on Iran, it turns out that the suspect wasn't a member of the IRG at all! Ooops!
THE GUARDIAN EDITORIAL DEFENDING ROTHSCHILD AGENT KHORDOKOVSKY IS CONDEMNED BY PUBLIC
The editorial in Trickyleaks Mockingbird Media asset The Guardian today attempts to defend Mikhail Khordokovsky, and it appears to have been written by Khordokovsky himself. A large number of comments have been posted by members of the public, and the vast majority of those comments condemn the editorial and support the verdict and the action of Russia in jailing the Rothschild agent Khordokovsky.
The editorial is entitled "Mikhail Khodorkovsky: Russia's political prisoner".
A number of the comments refer to the number of people being held without trial in Guantanamo Bay, and rampage that the UK and USA have been on in the last decade or two.
This comment from Geronimo says it all
It is possible that Khodorkovsky is a sacrificial lamb, witting or unwitting.
The editorial is entitled "Mikhail Khodorkovsky: Russia's political prisoner".
A number of the comments refer to the number of people being held without trial in Guantanamo Bay, and rampage that the UK and USA have been on in the last decade or two.
This comment from Geronimo says it all
Oh, right... so Khordokovsky's grotesque asset-stripping of the Ex-Soviet Union under Yeltsin isn't in question, but it's not fair that he has to serve a few years in jail, while his mate Berezovsky is free in London as guest of successive UK governments, despite (allegedly) even more grotesque shenanigans, not definitely excluding his mate Litvinenko's grotesque demise?
And frankly, after the Iraq invasion and many other crimes against humanity, it's a bit rich for the US and UK to be taking the high moral ground against the Russian administration. Especially since their own highly political campaign against Putin is based largely on disinformation and innuendo, rather than anything that would stand up in a court of law in the US or UK, in the unlikely event that the court was entirely free of political influence.
It is possible that Khodorkovsky is a sacrificial lamb, witting or unwitting.
THE TIMING OF OPERATION GET VINCE CABLE
Did you notice that they waited until AFTER the vote on student tuition fees?
Monday, December 27, 2010
YET MORE ANTI RUSSIA CABLES FROM TRICKYLEAKS ON A SIGNIFICANT DAY
In Russia today Mikhail Khodorkovsky was found guilty of theft and money laundering, and will be sentenced later.
In the UK today, and in fact not just the UK but the whole world via the internet, Trickyleaks released a cable from the US Embassy in Moscow which is entitled RULE OF LAW LIPSTICK ON A POLITICAL PIG: KHODORKOVSKIY CASE PLODS ALONG
So who is Mikhail Khodorkovsky and what are his connections and activities?
Mikhail Khodorkovsky is one of the oligarchs who made a fortune raping Russia. His connections extend into the heart of the British ruling elite, as described in the report published earlier this year entitled "Rothschilds Run British Intelligence Operation into Russia through JNR and Diligence", available to read at http://www.larouchepac.com/node/13871
Isn't it amazing that such a cable would be leaked on the day that Khodorkovsky was found guilty...AGAIN!
And isn't it amazing that not one cable released by Trickyleaks disputes the bogus 9/11 theory that a man requiring kidney dialysis and hiding in a cave managed to out fox the greatest military in the world and fly a passenger plane into its HQ, the Pentagon, as well as bring down WTC 1, 2 and 7, in the space of a few hours, resulting in the US invading the energy rich Middle East and Caspian regions and setting up camp on Russia's back door step.
Well, actually, it's not that amazing when Assange believes that's what happened!
In the UK today, and in fact not just the UK but the whole world via the internet, Trickyleaks released a cable from the US Embassy in Moscow which is entitled RULE OF LAW LIPSTICK ON A POLITICAL PIG: KHODORKOVSKIY CASE PLODS ALONG
So who is Mikhail Khodorkovsky and what are his connections and activities?
Mikhail Khodorkovsky is one of the oligarchs who made a fortune raping Russia. His connections extend into the heart of the British ruling elite, as described in the report published earlier this year entitled "Rothschilds Run British Intelligence Operation into Russia through JNR and Diligence", available to read at http://www.larouchepac.com/node/13871
The main investment vehicle of the Rothschilds into Russia and Eastern Europe is JNR UK Ltd, an investment bank specializing in Eastern Europe and Russia. JNR stands for Jacob and Nathaniel Rothschild. Since Feb. 2003, Nathaniel Rothschild has been director of JNR. JNR has offices in Guernsey and Switzerland. The decision to run JNR out of its Swiss and Guernsey offices was made for tax reasons. Most of the revenues are derived from outside the UK.
Through JNR the Rothschilds run their operations inside Russia and Eastern Europe in conjunction with the Russian oligarchy. As previously reported, Nathaniel Rothschild, as director of JNR, is the chief advisor to Russian aluminum oligarch Oleg Deripaska and Deripaska's Rusal, the world's largest aluminum company, in which Rothschild is also heavily invested. In addition to his relationship to Oleg Deripaska, Nathaniel Rothschild's best friend is another Russian billionaire oligarch, Roman Abramovich. An earlier operation, the Wellsian, Open Russia Foundation, which was set up by the Rothschilds with Russian oligarch Khodorkovsky, was shut down in 2006 by Russian authorities after Khodorkovsky's criminal conviction.
Just prior to his arrest, Khodorkovsky attempted to hand over control of the Yukos oil company to Jacob Rothschild. Khodorkovsky had a "previously unknown arrangement" with Jacob Rothschild for the latter to take control of the former's Yukos stock in the event that the former could no longer "act as a beneficiary" of the shares. This effort to give control of Yukos to Rothschild was thwarted when, in 2004, the government of Russia seized and sold Yukos's largest production unit in compensation for large back tax bills.
In 2007, JNR acquired a corporate intelligence firm called Diligence to coordinate its intelligence operations in Russia as well as elsewhere. Diligence was founded in 2000 by Nick Day, a former British special forces and MI5 operative, and ex-CIA agent Mike Baker, who no longer works for the company. Day reportedly saw an opening for a new business when British companies were entering emerging markets, targeting Russia. According to Handelsblatt, more than half of their roughly 100 employees are former members of an intelligence service.
Michael Howard, former UK Conservative Party leader sits on Diligence's advisory board beside Judge William Webster, former director of the CIA and FBI, and Edward Mathias, managing director of Carlyle. Diligence describes itself as an intelligence-gathering and risk-management firm. It now boasts offices in London, Washington, Moscow and Hong Kong.
Isn't it amazing that such a cable would be leaked on the day that Khodorkovsky was found guilty...AGAIN!
And isn't it amazing that not one cable released by Trickyleaks disputes the bogus 9/11 theory that a man requiring kidney dialysis and hiding in a cave managed to out fox the greatest military in the world and fly a passenger plane into its HQ, the Pentagon, as well as bring down WTC 1, 2 and 7, in the space of a few hours, resulting in the US invading the energy rich Middle East and Caspian regions and setting up camp on Russia's back door step.
Well, actually, it's not that amazing when Assange believes that's what happened!
Saturday, December 25, 2010
ASSANGE CLAIMS MEDIA BIAS
Julian Assange is now claiming that there is bias in the media that is publishing his leaks. He claims that the media have only published 1-2% of the files related to Israel, and that this is due to "sensitivities". As I understand it, Assange claimed this in an interview with Ahmed Mansour of al Jazeera on 23/12/2010, and the interview is available to watch at the end of this blog. However, the interviewer's questions are not asked in English and Assange's answers, though in English, are dubbed so that Assange's answers in English cannot be understood.
But in to published excerpts from the interview Assange claims that Israel did indeed use British passports for an assassination in Dubai. Assange also denies meeting with Israeli officials for payment.
Excerpts from the interview are now given from
http://www.thepeninsulaqatar.com/qatar/136564-wikileaks-to-release-israel-documents-in-six-months.html
But I thought Wikileaks was created to leak secret information, not for the Ziomedia to edit and publish what it wanted us to read?
Perhaps, or perhaps not, this explains why one of the latest cables is one in which Miss 9/11, Condoleeza Rice claims that Israel destroyed a suspected nuclear reactor in Syria in 2007.
And perhaps, or perhaps not, this explains why some cables have been published with such unwarranted alarmism, and I refer to the case of the alleged purchase of missiles by Iran from North Korea, or that the undead Osama bin Laden is alive and well and living it up in various nations hostile to Israel, such as Iran or Pakistan.
I have to admit that some of the leaks from Wikileaks have been of public interest. There is a useful article on this by Glen Greenwald entitled What WikiLeaks revealed to the world in 2010, but I also have to admit, and have been doing so, that I have been suspicious of a pro-Israel bias in the 'reporting' of the leaks.
But should this come as a surprise when Assange believes
1. 9/11 was run by a man requiring kidney dialysis hiding in a cave,
2. Nutternyahu is a good man,
3. when Nutternyahu said on 9/11 that 9/11 would be good for Israel and confirmed that it had been so a few years later
Perhaps, or perhaps not, this is what happens when you hand editorial control over to the Mockingbird Media.
Perhaps, or perhaps not, this explains why I cannot find a report in The Guardian about these latest comments by Assange.
And perhaps, or perhaps not, Assange is bona fide. Very naive for allowing the warmongering New York Times, the geoncidal Guardian and the Gladio Spiegel, all bona fide members of the Mockingbird Media, to edit the leaks for him, but bona fide nonetheless.
I guess the question could boil down to do you trust John Pilger?
But in to published excerpts from the interview Assange claims that Israel did indeed use British passports for an assassination in Dubai. Assange also denies meeting with Israeli officials for payment.
Excerpts from the interview are now given from
http://www.thepeninsulaqatar.com/qatar/136564-wikileaks-to-release-israel-documents-in-six-months.html
An Arabic newspaper called Al Haqeeq conducted an interview with one of your former colleagues who said you have a deal with Israel not to publish these secret files.
This is not true. We have been accused as agents of Iran and CIA by this former colleague who was working for Germany in the past and was dismissed from his job after we published American military documents related to Germany.
We were the biggest institution receiving official funding from the US but after we released a video tape about killing people in cold blood in Iraq in 2007, the funding stopped and we had to depend on individuals for finance.
When will you publish the files related to Israel on your website?
We will publish 3700 files and the source is the American embassy in Tel Aviv. Prime Minister Netanyahu was traveling to Paris to talk to the US ambassador there. You will see more information about that in six months.
Do these Israeli files speak about the July 2006 Israeli war against Lebanon?
Yes there is some information about that and these files were classified as top secret.
Is there any relation with these files and the assassination of Hamas military leader Al Mabhoh in Dubai?
Yes there are some indication to this and may be some special reports published by newspapers. Mossad agents used Australian, British and European passports to travel to Dubai and there are diplomatic files about that.
Are there any security service companies providing information to international airports and monitoring passengers even in the Arab countries?
There are some files about American and Israeli security companies that tried to intervene in certain areas. For example, in Brazil, the American embassy put some Israeli security companies during the Olympic Games.
Are there any files about agencies providing intelligence information about famous personalities in the Arab world?
I am not sure about that but there are files about Hezbollah in Lebanon. In one of these files Lebanon government complained against cables passing near the French embassy. American are always very much worried about the telecommunications network.
Are there any files about Israeli agents in the Arab world including some Arab royal palaces.
Most of the files related to Mossad are classified as top secret but there may be some files related to the role of Mossad in killing Lebanese military leader in Damascus by sniper bullets.
There 2,500 files related to Mossad and I have read only 1000. So I don’t know about everythiong, I need more journalists including Arabs to read and analyse and put everything in the context for the benefit of the readers.
We have 17,000 files where the word Qatar has been mentioned, the source of 3,000 of these files is the American embassy in Doha.
What is the most interesting file about Qatar that was not published?
There is a lot to be read. The name of Waddah Khanfar has been mentioned in 504 files. Some of these files have been published by The Guardian.
How do the Americans view Al Jazeera in these files?
There were some meetings between people from Al Jazeera and the US embassy where the latter suggested coverage of certain things in a certain way.
There are files about a TV channel in Dubai which the Americans said can be used against Al Jazeera and when this channel tried to move in the American direction, people stopped watching it.
The Americans despite having a base here were angry about the presence of an Iranian bank in Qatar but Qatar said it would not close it but would not open new banks. Despite that this bank established many more branches in Doha. Qatar is trying to create a balance between the Arab world and the America.
The Americans appreciate having their largest base in Doha but Qatar does not agree with all American requirements and Al Jazeera is a good example for that.
But I thought Wikileaks was created to leak secret information, not for the Ziomedia to edit and publish what it wanted us to read?
Perhaps, or perhaps not, this explains why one of the latest cables is one in which Miss 9/11, Condoleeza Rice claims that Israel destroyed a suspected nuclear reactor in Syria in 2007.
And perhaps, or perhaps not, this explains why some cables have been published with such unwarranted alarmism, and I refer to the case of the alleged purchase of missiles by Iran from North Korea, or that the undead Osama bin Laden is alive and well and living it up in various nations hostile to Israel, such as Iran or Pakistan.
I have to admit that some of the leaks from Wikileaks have been of public interest. There is a useful article on this by Glen Greenwald entitled What WikiLeaks revealed to the world in 2010, but I also have to admit, and have been doing so, that I have been suspicious of a pro-Israel bias in the 'reporting' of the leaks.
But should this come as a surprise when Assange believes
1. 9/11 was run by a man requiring kidney dialysis hiding in a cave,
2. Nutternyahu is a good man,
3. when Nutternyahu said on 9/11 that 9/11 would be good for Israel and confirmed that it had been so a few years later
Perhaps, or perhaps not, this is what happens when you hand editorial control over to the Mockingbird Media.
Perhaps, or perhaps not, this explains why I cannot find a report in The Guardian about these latest comments by Assange.
And perhaps, or perhaps not, Assange is bona fide. Very naive for allowing the warmongering New York Times, the geoncidal Guardian and the Gladio Spiegel, all bona fide members of the Mockingbird Media, to edit the leaks for him, but bona fide nonetheless.
I guess the question could boil down to do you trust John Pilger?
Friday, December 24, 2010
THE MURDOCH TIMES AND BBC REPORTS OF IRANIAN REVOLUTIONARY GUARD ARMS SMUGGLER ARE COMPLETE BULLSHIT
Merry Bullshit, everybody!
I awoke this morning to the highly 'respectable' and 'regarded' (used in the loosest possible terms) (Nazi) BBC Radio 4 telling me, and thus you, that a member of the al-Quds branch of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard had been arrested on suspicion of smuggling arms from Iran into Afghanistan. Every half hour the news bulletin on this grew and grew and grew, so that by mid-morning you could believe that the Taliban were a creation of Iran, that they got all their arms from the IRG and were using these arms to kill British soldiers, the implication being that we should therefore declare war on Iran immediately.
It must also be noted that the only UK newspapers reporting on this are The Times (Murdoch) and The Daily Telegraph (with an insider helping Murdoch).
But now NATO are saying that the man who has been arrested is not a member of the IRG at all, amd will not even confirm that he is Iranian.
But for whatever reason, The Times and The Daily Telegraph are not reporting that
1. The Taliban was created by the Pakistan ISI with CIA money
2. The Taliban got out of control, destroyed the opium and wanted too much money for the pipelines being proposed that would run across their areas of control, so shortly before 9/11 they were threatened with "a carpet of gold or a carpet of bombs". They got the bombs.
3. The US military is now in cahoots with the new Taliban (after the old out-of-control Taliban had been replaced) and Aghan drug lords after the opium crop has been increased to record levels and needs protecting with US muscle.
4. Russia and Iran want this opium crop destroyed and heroin smuggling stopped because it is wrecking their nations, while the New World Order want it expanded for fantastic private profits and to destroy the lives of sovereign nations and their peoples.
Hence any possible line of attack on Iran or Russia, as false as it may be, is useful to the heroin-smuggling, carpet-bombing, civilian-murdering New World Order.
==================================
From http://www.dawn.com/2010/12/24/iranian-officer-captured-in-afghanistan-nato.html
Nato backtracks on ‘Iran arms smuggler’ held in Afghanistan
KABUL: A man accused of smuggling weapons into Afghanistan was not a member of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard’s elite al-Quds unit, coalition forces said Friday, withdrawing a previous claim.
The Nato-led International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) had previously said the man, who was captured by US special forces Saturday, was from al-Quds, which specialises in foreign operations.
It later retracted the statement but still accused him of being involved in smuggling weapons from Iran into Kandahar, a Taliban heartland in the south of Afghanistan where fighting is among the fiercest in the country.
ISAF added that the man, who was captured in Zhari district, had direct links to Taliban leaders in the province. Its spokesman would not comment on whether he was Iranian.
I awoke this morning to the highly 'respectable' and 'regarded' (used in the loosest possible terms) (Nazi) BBC Radio 4 telling me, and thus you, that a member of the al-Quds branch of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard had been arrested on suspicion of smuggling arms from Iran into Afghanistan. Every half hour the news bulletin on this grew and grew and grew, so that by mid-morning you could believe that the Taliban were a creation of Iran, that they got all their arms from the IRG and were using these arms to kill British soldiers, the implication being that we should therefore declare war on Iran immediately.
It must also be noted that the only UK newspapers reporting on this are The Times (Murdoch) and The Daily Telegraph (with an insider helping Murdoch).
But now NATO are saying that the man who has been arrested is not a member of the IRG at all, amd will not even confirm that he is Iranian.
But for whatever reason, The Times and The Daily Telegraph are not reporting that
1. The Taliban was created by the Pakistan ISI with CIA money
2. The Taliban got out of control, destroyed the opium and wanted too much money for the pipelines being proposed that would run across their areas of control, so shortly before 9/11 they were threatened with "a carpet of gold or a carpet of bombs". They got the bombs.
3. The US military is now in cahoots with the new Taliban (after the old out-of-control Taliban had been replaced) and Aghan drug lords after the opium crop has been increased to record levels and needs protecting with US muscle.
4. Russia and Iran want this opium crop destroyed and heroin smuggling stopped because it is wrecking their nations, while the New World Order want it expanded for fantastic private profits and to destroy the lives of sovereign nations and their peoples.
Hence any possible line of attack on Iran or Russia, as false as it may be, is useful to the heroin-smuggling, carpet-bombing, civilian-murdering New World Order.
==================================
From http://www.dawn.com/2010/12/24/iranian-officer-captured-in-afghanistan-nato.html
Nato backtracks on ‘Iran arms smuggler’ held in Afghanistan
KABUL: A man accused of smuggling weapons into Afghanistan was not a member of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard’s elite al-Quds unit, coalition forces said Friday, withdrawing a previous claim.
The Nato-led International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) had previously said the man, who was captured by US special forces Saturday, was from al-Quds, which specialises in foreign operations.
It later retracted the statement but still accused him of being involved in smuggling weapons from Iran into Kandahar, a Taliban heartland in the south of Afghanistan where fighting is among the fiercest in the country.
ISAF added that the man, who was captured in Zhari district, had direct links to Taliban leaders in the province. Its spokesman would not comment on whether he was Iranian.
Thursday, December 23, 2010
OPERATION GET VINCE CABLE
It now appears that Vince Cable was not the only target for The Daily Telegraph. Reporters were sent out with secret recording equipment to pretend to be constituents of a number of LibDem ministers, which implies to me that the DT was on a fishing trip to catch LibDems in vulnerable situations probably with the goal of disrupting the coalition. The relationship between constituent and MP is similar to that of patient and doctor. I've spoken to my MP face to face once and would expect that what was said was kept between the both of us. That implied trust between constituent and MP has now been broken.
But what happened with Vince Cable is very suspicious.
I knew that Cable would be got, and said so in May. But the way he was got raises some very serious questions.
For although it was The Daily Telegraph who did the fishing it was the BBC's Robert Peston who somehow got to break the big story of Cable's war on Murdoch. Cable's kingdom was subsequently reduced, and it now looks like a man who opposed the expansion of the Bilderberg Murdoch empire, Vince Cable, is to be replaced by a man who does support the expansion of the Bilderberg Murdoch empire, Jeremy Hunt.
One could ask, and a lot of people have been asking, why did The Daily Telegraph not report the big story, that Cable had declared war on Murdoch, immediately? Perhaps because of the outcome? That Cable, who would more than likely have ruled against the expansion, would be denied the responsibility of taking that decision. Surely the outcome that has manifested is against the interests of the The Daily Telegraph.
So why would somebody leak the Cable recordings to the BBC to the detriment of their employer?
Reasons could be
1. personal financial gain
2. other
And the "other" is where my suspicion lies.
There is a network of intelligence operatives buried in our media. I call it the Mockingbird Media, after the CIA's Operation Mockingbird. It serves the Bilderberg agenda. It lies to us. It sends us into wars. It serves to keep us occupied with trivia and useless boring entertainment rather than to inform us.
Not every employee in the media is a member of this network, but some are.
One of the main warmongers of the last decade was The Daily Telegraph. It published documents that accused George Galloway of taking kickbacks from Saddam Hussein. Galloway took them to court and won.
The Daily Telegraph released the expense claims of MPs via Ex-SAS major John Wick, but does nothing to expose Bilderberg or the corrupt and fraudulent practices of our banking system, so public anger is directed at MPs not the banks.
The Daily Telegraph has one journalist/blogger of some integrity and independence, James Delingpole, but that's about it.
The Daily Telegraph could not have published the Cable recording because nobody would understand why it had done so if it gave a competitor an advantage.
This very curious leak to Peston benefits two groups; Bilderberg Murdoch, and the banks. Cable is politically wounded for now. After New Year he could be gone from the Cabinet.
But what happened with Vince Cable is very suspicious.
I knew that Cable would be got, and said so in May. But the way he was got raises some very serious questions.
For although it was The Daily Telegraph who did the fishing it was the BBC's Robert Peston who somehow got to break the big story of Cable's war on Murdoch. Cable's kingdom was subsequently reduced, and it now looks like a man who opposed the expansion of the Bilderberg Murdoch empire, Vince Cable, is to be replaced by a man who does support the expansion of the Bilderberg Murdoch empire, Jeremy Hunt.
One could ask, and a lot of people have been asking, why did The Daily Telegraph not report the big story, that Cable had declared war on Murdoch, immediately? Perhaps because of the outcome? That Cable, who would more than likely have ruled against the expansion, would be denied the responsibility of taking that decision. Surely the outcome that has manifested is against the interests of the The Daily Telegraph.
So why would somebody leak the Cable recordings to the BBC to the detriment of their employer?
Reasons could be
1. personal financial gain
2. other
And the "other" is where my suspicion lies.
There is a network of intelligence operatives buried in our media. I call it the Mockingbird Media, after the CIA's Operation Mockingbird. It serves the Bilderberg agenda. It lies to us. It sends us into wars. It serves to keep us occupied with trivia and useless boring entertainment rather than to inform us.
Not every employee in the media is a member of this network, but some are.
One of the main warmongers of the last decade was The Daily Telegraph. It published documents that accused George Galloway of taking kickbacks from Saddam Hussein. Galloway took them to court and won.
The Daily Telegraph released the expense claims of MPs via Ex-SAS major John Wick, but does nothing to expose Bilderberg or the corrupt and fraudulent practices of our banking system, so public anger is directed at MPs not the banks.
The Daily Telegraph has one journalist/blogger of some integrity and independence, James Delingpole, but that's about it.
The Daily Telegraph could not have published the Cable recording because nobody would understand why it had done so if it gave a competitor an advantage.
This very curious leak to Peston benefits two groups; Bilderberg Murdoch, and the banks. Cable is politically wounded for now. After New Year he could be gone from the Cabinet.
Wednesday, December 22, 2010
WIKILEAKS 'LEAKS' A PUBLIC REPORT FROM 2008, AND GUESS WHAT?
A few days ago the twelve alleged Islamic terrorists of Christmas were arrested on suspicion of plotting to blow up several unnamed targets across the UK. No guns or explosives have been found (or if so not reported), and the alleged plot was halted for safety reasons.
But now, with superb timing, the superduper Wikileaks organisation in conjunction with the Mockingbird Media has 'leaked' a cable that refers to a report that was released by the Centre for Social Cohesion in 2008!
The report is entitled Islam on Campus, and its conclusions are based on the answers of just 600 of the estimated 90,000 Islamic students in higher education in British universities. Apparently 32% of Islamic respondents agreed that it was justifiable to killl in the name of religion. However, that number is made up of two answers;
1. Yes in order to preserve and promote that religion
Muslim 4%
Non Muslim 1%
2. Yes, but only if that religion is under attack
Muslim 28%
Non Muslim 1%
[source : Islam on Campus, Centre for Social Cohesion, 2008, Diagram 24, page 43]
To explain this we must go back to yesteryear. We, that is USA-Europe-Israel, have been camped in the predominantly Muslim area of the Caspian and Middle East for centuries, extracting oil and gas. And since 9/11 our corporate presence in the region has expanded and been backed up with more muscle in the form of NATO and US military bases. There is no reciprocal invasion of our nations by the Middle Eastern countries, and I am sure that if there was then the number of non Muslims answering "Yes, but only if that religion is under attack" would be much much higher.
The Daily Mail is the only newspaper I can find reporting on this cable.
======================
From http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1340599/The-latest-WikiLeaks-revelation-1-3-British-Muslim-students-killing-Islam-40-want-Sharia-law.html
The latest WikiLeaks revelation: 1 in 3 British Muslim students back killing for Islam and 40% want Sharia law
By Daily Mail Reporter
Last updated at 8:36 AM on 22nd December 2010
Around a third of young British Muslims favour killing in the name of Islam, according to a survey revealed by the WikiLeaks' publication of U.S. diplomatic cables.
A survey of 600 Muslim students at 30 universities throughout Britain found that 32 per cent of Muslim respondents believed killing in the name of religion is justified.
A U.S. diplomatic cable from January 2009 quoted a poll by the Centre for Social Cohesion as saying 54 per cent wanted a Muslim party to represent their world view in Parliament and 40 per cent want Muslims in the UK to be under Sharia law.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1340599/The-latest-WikiLeaks-revelation-1-3-British-Muslim-students-killing-Islam-40-want-Sharia-law.html#ixzz18q2CRdpo
But now, with superb timing, the superduper Wikileaks organisation in conjunction with the Mockingbird Media has 'leaked' a cable that refers to a report that was released by the Centre for Social Cohesion in 2008!
The report is entitled Islam on Campus, and its conclusions are based on the answers of just 600 of the estimated 90,000 Islamic students in higher education in British universities. Apparently 32% of Islamic respondents agreed that it was justifiable to killl in the name of religion. However, that number is made up of two answers;
1. Yes in order to preserve and promote that religion
Muslim 4%
Non Muslim 1%
2. Yes, but only if that religion is under attack
Muslim 28%
Non Muslim 1%
[source : Islam on Campus, Centre for Social Cohesion, 2008, Diagram 24, page 43]
To explain this we must go back to yesteryear. We, that is USA-Europe-Israel, have been camped in the predominantly Muslim area of the Caspian and Middle East for centuries, extracting oil and gas. And since 9/11 our corporate presence in the region has expanded and been backed up with more muscle in the form of NATO and US military bases. There is no reciprocal invasion of our nations by the Middle Eastern countries, and I am sure that if there was then the number of non Muslims answering "Yes, but only if that religion is under attack" would be much much higher.
The Daily Mail is the only newspaper I can find reporting on this cable.
======================
From http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1340599/The-latest-WikiLeaks-revelation-1-3-British-Muslim-students-killing-Islam-40-want-Sharia-law.html
The latest WikiLeaks revelation: 1 in 3 British Muslim students back killing for Islam and 40% want Sharia law
By Daily Mail Reporter
Last updated at 8:36 AM on 22nd December 2010
Around a third of young British Muslims favour killing in the name of Islam, according to a survey revealed by the WikiLeaks' publication of U.S. diplomatic cables.
A survey of 600 Muslim students at 30 universities throughout Britain found that 32 per cent of Muslim respondents believed killing in the name of religion is justified.
A U.S. diplomatic cable from January 2009 quoted a poll by the Centre for Social Cohesion as saying 54 per cent wanted a Muslim party to represent their world view in Parliament and 40 per cent want Muslims in the UK to be under Sharia law.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1340599/The-latest-WikiLeaks-revelation-1-3-British-Muslim-students-killing-Islam-40-want-Sharia-law.html#ixzz18q2CRdpo
Tuesday, December 21, 2010
THE FINAL GLOBAL WAR ON VINCE CABLE
Shortly after the General Election this year, on 15th May I posted the blog entitled THE GLOBAL WAR ON VINCE CABLE. I predicted that Vince, due to his overt and strong anti-bank feelings, would be under attack and possibly removed so that the banks could have a much easier time without Vince Cable blasting them and trying to reel them in to reduce their power. Cable had written a book about the current financial crisis, and knew something of the details of the collapse, but like Gillian Tett he believes in the Shit Happens theory of history, ignoring the facts that it is always the same cabal who comes out on top after any crises they have engineered.
Anyway, Cable's speech at the Lib Dem conference, in which he referred to the spivs and gamblers, was strong but obviously not strong enough because The Daily Telegraph sent two female reporters pretending to be constituents of Cable's. They tricked him into opening up to them on a couple of issues. Result? Labour is now calling for his head.
Labour calling for Vince Cable's head?
Yeah, you heard that correct.
Labour is calling for Vince Cable's head.
Who else in the ConDem coalition could scare the banks more than Cable? NOBODY!
Labour created the current financial crisis, and the ConDem coalition is continuing the crisis by allowing the banks to continue their derivatives gambling, something that Cable wanted stopped and could have stopped.
NB Cable has been caught over remarks regarding Rupert Murdoch. Cable opposed the expansion of the Murdoch Empire. Murdoch is Bilderberg. Cable is not. What Bilderberg wants, Bilderberg gets.
Vince Cable must remain in his post to bring the banks to heel.
Heel, banks! Heel!
Anyway, Cable's speech at the Lib Dem conference, in which he referred to the spivs and gamblers, was strong but obviously not strong enough because The Daily Telegraph sent two female reporters pretending to be constituents of Cable's. They tricked him into opening up to them on a couple of issues. Result? Labour is now calling for his head.
Labour calling for Vince Cable's head?
Yeah, you heard that correct.
Labour is calling for Vince Cable's head.
Who else in the ConDem coalition could scare the banks more than Cable? NOBODY!
Labour created the current financial crisis, and the ConDem coalition is continuing the crisis by allowing the banks to continue their derivatives gambling, something that Cable wanted stopped and could have stopped.
NB Cable has been caught over remarks regarding Rupert Murdoch. Cable opposed the expansion of the Murdoch Empire. Murdoch is Bilderberg. Cable is not. What Bilderberg wants, Bilderberg gets.
Vince Cable must remain in his post to bring the banks to heel.
Heel, banks! Heel!
Monday, December 20, 2010
THE TWELVE ALLEGED TERRORISTS OF CHRISTMAS
Twelve people have been arrested today on the suspicion of the commission, preparation or instigation of an act of terrorism in the UK.
But as with the alleged plot to blow up Europe by the mysterious Abdul Jabbar a few months ago, just a month before the US mid-term elections, there is some confusion as to the status of the plot.
The Daily Mail is screaming that the plot is at an advance stage [1], in which case I would expect some materials to be found, and the report even contradicts itself with a quote from Metropolitan Police Assistant Commissioner John Yates, national lead for counter-terrorism, who is quoted as saying
However other UK media are reporting a different status of the plot which is in agreement with Yates.
The Independent reports the same quotes from Yates above, but half the report is dedicated to recalling the aforementioned alleged attack to blow up Europe by the mysterious Abdul Jabbar, as well as references to 9/11.[2]
The Guardian takes the same line as The Independent, but refers to the intelligence, or lack of, that led to the arrests.
The Daily Telegraph also takes this same line, and also refers to the recent attack in Stockholm.
So currently the Mockingbird media is more or less taking the same calm line on these arrests, in that
1. the alleged plot is in its early stages (except for The Daily Mail which claims the plot is advanced but then contradicts itself, which could imply something to us...)
2. no specific intelligence is given
3. the arrests are being made for safety
4. but references to Mumbai-style attacks (that didn't occur), 9/11, the Blazing Underpants bomber and more recently Stockholm are also made just to reinforce the theory that all Muslims are terrorists.
On the first day of Christmas Allah gave to me a terrorist in a pear tree...
[1] Anti-terror squad arrest 12 men 'planning UK terror attack': Christmas plot at advanced stage, say police, The Daily Mail, 20/12/2010
[2] Twelve held following major anti-terror swoop, The Independent, 20/12/2010
[3] Anti-terror police arrest 12 in UK raids, The Guardian, 20/12/2010
[4] Anti-terror police arrest 12 people in nationwide raids, The Daily Telegraph, 20/12/2010
But as with the alleged plot to blow up Europe by the mysterious Abdul Jabbar a few months ago, just a month before the US mid-term elections, there is some confusion as to the status of the plot.
The Daily Mail is screaming that the plot is at an advance stage [1], in which case I would expect some materials to be found, and the report even contradicts itself with a quote from Metropolitan Police Assistant Commissioner John Yates, national lead for counter-terrorism, who is quoted as saying
"The operation is in its early stages so we are unable to go into detail at this time about the suspected offences...However, I believe it was necessary at this time to take action in order to ensure public safety."[1]
However other UK media are reporting a different status of the plot which is in agreement with Yates.
The Independent reports the same quotes from Yates above, but half the report is dedicated to recalling the aforementioned alleged attack to blow up Europe by the mysterious Abdul Jabbar, as well as references to 9/11.[2]
The Guardian takes the same line as The Independent, but refers to the intelligence, or lack of, that led to the arrests.
Counter-terror officials believed a bombing attack was being prepared and arrested the men.
The closeness of Christmas appears to have been a factor, but it is not clear whether investigators were nervous because of any specific intelligence that an attack was imminent, or whether the "landmark" date made them anxious.[3]
The Daily Telegraph also takes this same line, and also refers to the recent attack in Stockholm.
It is not thought the men have any connection with Taimur Abdulwahab al-Abdaly, the Stockholm suicide bomber who lived in Luton for many years.[4]
So currently the Mockingbird media is more or less taking the same calm line on these arrests, in that
1. the alleged plot is in its early stages (except for The Daily Mail which claims the plot is advanced but then contradicts itself, which could imply something to us...)
2. no specific intelligence is given
3. the arrests are being made for safety
4. but references to Mumbai-style attacks (that didn't occur), 9/11, the Blazing Underpants bomber and more recently Stockholm are also made just to reinforce the theory that all Muslims are terrorists.
On the first day of Christmas Allah gave to me a terrorist in a pear tree...
[1] Anti-terror squad arrest 12 men 'planning UK terror attack': Christmas plot at advanced stage, say police, The Daily Mail, 20/12/2010
[2] Twelve held following major anti-terror swoop, The Independent, 20/12/2010
[3] Anti-terror police arrest 12 in UK raids, The Guardian, 20/12/2010
[4] Anti-terror police arrest 12 people in nationwide raids, The Daily Telegraph, 20/12/2010
Sunday, December 19, 2010
THE IMF ARE GANGSTAZ
Do not be offended by the foul language of the previous blog. Such language which is associated with gangstaz was used for artistic effect, to get it through that the IMF are indeed gangstaz, simple and plain gangstaz, but dressed in suits.
Instead of shaking down the local shop owners for 'protection money' they shake down whole countries.
Instead of loan sharking at exorbitant rates they manipulate economies so that a $1 billion loan turns into a $50 billion loan.
Instead of pushing dope on the street corner they demand severe austerity which leads to poverty and death in huge numbers.
In comparison to the IMF the first kind of gangsta, the small time local gangsta who might sell an ounce of methamphetamine or burgle a house or steal a car, is a saint. The differences between the two are that the IMF think global and the IMF wear suits.
So remember, the IMF are International Mother Fucking gangstaz,
IMF = International Mutha Fuckaz
Instead of shaking down the local shop owners for 'protection money' they shake down whole countries.
Instead of loan sharking at exorbitant rates they manipulate economies so that a $1 billion loan turns into a $50 billion loan.
Instead of pushing dope on the street corner they demand severe austerity which leads to poverty and death in huge numbers.
In comparison to the IMF the first kind of gangsta, the small time local gangsta who might sell an ounce of methamphetamine or burgle a house or steal a car, is a saint. The differences between the two are that the IMF think global and the IMF wear suits.
So remember, the IMF are International Mother Fucking gangstaz,
IMF = International Mutha Fuckaz
Saturday, December 18, 2010
LIKE BILDERBERG SOROS, BILDERBERG IMF CHIEF AGAIN PROPOSES YET MORE EUROPEAN INTEGRATION TO SAVE EURO
The Bilderberg International Mother Fucker (IMF) Chief Dominique Strauss-Kahn has again implicitly blackmailed Eurozone nations to back the Euro, no matter what.
You don't become Chief International Mother Fucker without being a complete sociopath. As soon as Strauss-Kahn was imposed as Chief International Mother Fucker he was charged with harrassing women for sex, charges which were dropped after pressure.
The IMF has been proposed as the de facto economic branch of the world government. It's role is to allegedly distribute wealth, but is in fact just an extension of the Nazi economic policies after the Rockefellers et al financed the Nazis and their eugenic policies.
The real situation is this. They call it the free market and freedom and democracy, when it is really a rigged market with them being able to create money out of nothing, them being able to rip us off and send us into war and them imposing our political leaders upon us.
By again proposing yet more European monetary and political integration the Chief International Mother Fucker Dominique Strauss-Kahn is again driving the agenda towards world government.
And such financial chaos as this would not have occured had it not been for the Rothschild Inter Alpha Group, whose banks are being bailed out by sovereign nations, who are then scurrying to the IMF for bailouts, dumping private gambling debts onto taxpayers and thus surrendering national sovereignty to the International Mother Fuckers.
==============
From http://uk.reuters.com/article/idUKTRE6BF45I20101217
IMF chief worried about Europe domino effect
(Reuters) - The head of the International Monetary Fund said on Thursday he was worried that EU leaders' piecemeal approach to Europe's debt crisis was encouraging markets to pick off weak countries one by one.
Dominique Strauss-Kahn appeared to endorse the idea of common euro bonds, saying they could be a useful tool, but added the political will to give power to the center of Europe was the main hurdle to their creation.
"I am worried, and that's why I am urging the Europeans ... to provide a comprehensive solution because this piecemeal approach ... obviously doesn't work," Strauss-Kahn told Reuters. "The markets are just waiting for what's next."
Due to its cumbersome decision-making structure, the euro zone has tended to offer countries such as Greece and Ireland rescues only once they were "at the edge of the cliff," he said. That approach has created a domino effect.
Interviewed at a Thomson Reuters Newsmaker event, Strauss-Kahn spoke as European Union leaders began a two-day summit at which they agreed changes to the European Union's governing treaty to create a permanent mechanism for handling financial crises.
"You can't have a single currency, especially in times when you have troubles, without having more coordination and economic policy," Strauss-Kahn said, also calling on the EU to revisit with more rigor the bank stress tests it carried out earlier this year.
Saying decision-making among the 16 countries of the euro zone was too slow, Strauss-Kahn said he was confident that the resources to address countries' debt problems were available in Europe but "fair or unfair, there's skepticism in the markets so the problem has to be addressed."
"You can't have a single currency, especially in times when you have troubles, without having more coordination and economic policy,...fair or unfair, there's skepticism in the markets so the problem has to be addressed."
You don't become Chief International Mother Fucker without being a complete sociopath. As soon as Strauss-Kahn was imposed as Chief International Mother Fucker he was charged with harrassing women for sex, charges which were dropped after pressure.
The IMF has been proposed as the de facto economic branch of the world government. It's role is to allegedly distribute wealth, but is in fact just an extension of the Nazi economic policies after the Rockefellers et al financed the Nazis and their eugenic policies.
The real situation is this. They call it the free market and freedom and democracy, when it is really a rigged market with them being able to create money out of nothing, them being able to rip us off and send us into war and them imposing our political leaders upon us.
By again proposing yet more European monetary and political integration the Chief International Mother Fucker Dominique Strauss-Kahn is again driving the agenda towards world government.
And such financial chaos as this would not have occured had it not been for the Rothschild Inter Alpha Group, whose banks are being bailed out by sovereign nations, who are then scurrying to the IMF for bailouts, dumping private gambling debts onto taxpayers and thus surrendering national sovereignty to the International Mother Fuckers.
==============
From http://uk.reuters.com/article/idUKTRE6BF45I20101217
IMF chief worried about Europe domino effect
(Reuters) - The head of the International Monetary Fund said on Thursday he was worried that EU leaders' piecemeal approach to Europe's debt crisis was encouraging markets to pick off weak countries one by one.
Dominique Strauss-Kahn appeared to endorse the idea of common euro bonds, saying they could be a useful tool, but added the political will to give power to the center of Europe was the main hurdle to their creation.
"I am worried, and that's why I am urging the Europeans ... to provide a comprehensive solution because this piecemeal approach ... obviously doesn't work," Strauss-Kahn told Reuters. "The markets are just waiting for what's next."
Due to its cumbersome decision-making structure, the euro zone has tended to offer countries such as Greece and Ireland rescues only once they were "at the edge of the cliff," he said. That approach has created a domino effect.
Interviewed at a Thomson Reuters Newsmaker event, Strauss-Kahn spoke as European Union leaders began a two-day summit at which they agreed changes to the European Union's governing treaty to create a permanent mechanism for handling financial crises.
"You can't have a single currency, especially in times when you have troubles, without having more coordination and economic policy," Strauss-Kahn said, also calling on the EU to revisit with more rigor the bank stress tests it carried out earlier this year.
Saying decision-making among the 16 countries of the euro zone was too slow, Strauss-Kahn said he was confident that the resources to address countries' debt problems were available in Europe but "fair or unfair, there's skepticism in the markets so the problem has to be addressed."
Friday, December 17, 2010
ARROGANT JAMES BOND VILLAINS
You know the villains in James Bond movies? They always have two things in common.
1. They want to control the world
2. They always think they are unbeatable and confess the details of the plot.
Bond subsequently saves the world and usually ends up with a luscious unforgettable woman.
I'm thinking of something Pastor Lindsey Williams said a few days ago on the Alex Jones show, that "they" apparently have this 'code of honour', or ethic, which forces them to tell us what they are going to do before they do it.
Perhaps this alleged code of honour will be their undoing, in telling us.
Or perhaps they've said too much already.
Or perhaps they haven't said enough and with enough clarity. For example, if I said I was going to crash the global economy is it 'acceptable' enough to satisfy this 'ethic' that I just hint at a few figures that are briefly referred to in passing in a paragraph in the FT? Or should those details be laid out with great clarity in a 10 minute bulletin on the BBC 6 O' Clock News?
Either way, I do believe that there is an arrogance to these globalist villains, despite their secrecy at Bilderberg (which completely contradicts this 'ethic' that they tell us what they're going to do before they do it), and that it will be their undoing.
1. They want to control the world
2. They always think they are unbeatable and confess the details of the plot.
Bond subsequently saves the world and usually ends up with a luscious unforgettable woman.
I'm thinking of something Pastor Lindsey Williams said a few days ago on the Alex Jones show, that "they" apparently have this 'code of honour', or ethic, which forces them to tell us what they are going to do before they do it.
Perhaps this alleged code of honour will be their undoing, in telling us.
Or perhaps they've said too much already.
Or perhaps they haven't said enough and with enough clarity. For example, if I said I was going to crash the global economy is it 'acceptable' enough to satisfy this 'ethic' that I just hint at a few figures that are briefly referred to in passing in a paragraph in the FT? Or should those details be laid out with great clarity in a 10 minute bulletin on the BBC 6 O' Clock News?
Either way, I do believe that there is an arrogance to these globalist villains, despite their secrecy at Bilderberg (which completely contradicts this 'ethic' that they tell us what they're going to do before they do it), and that it will be their undoing.
Thursday, December 16, 2010
POSSIBLE CONTRADICTORY PREDICTIONS
The last few days on Alex Jones radio show have seen two incredible predictions.
The first came from Porter Stansberry, who said the Federal Reserve would bailout the Euro.
Then yesterday Pastor Lindsey Williams said that the Euro would collapse to be followed within weeks by the dollar.
It is possible that the Federal Reserve could attempt to bailout the Euro, but the bailout fails, so that both the Euro and dollar collapse very quickly, one after the other, probably Euro first.
But Stansberry did not state this. He said the dollar would collapse, not the Euro.
And Williams did not state that the Fed would try to bailout the Euro but fail.
So...
The first came from Porter Stansberry, who said the Federal Reserve would bailout the Euro.
Then yesterday Pastor Lindsey Williams said that the Euro would collapse to be followed within weeks by the dollar.
It is possible that the Federal Reserve could attempt to bailout the Euro, but the bailout fails, so that both the Euro and dollar collapse very quickly, one after the other, probably Euro first.
But Stansberry did not state this. He said the dollar would collapse, not the Euro.
And Williams did not state that the Fed would try to bailout the Euro but fail.
So...
Tuesday, December 14, 2010
WHEN WIKILEAKS IS GONE THE NEW YORK TIMES WILL STILL HAVE PRESENCE ON THE INTERNET
There is now open talk on BBC radio about killing the internet, and that if it is done then it will be due to Wikileaks. This was discussed on BBC Radio 4's phone in today, You and Yours, which today was entitled, Has Wikileaks struck a blow for open society?
One of the partners of Wikileaks is The New York Times, which is Bilderberg and CFR due to its owner Arthur Ochs Sulzberger, and is also pro-war.
If the kill switch is used on the internet it will be to give the internet to news organisations such as The NYT so that they and their Mockingbird kinsfolk can propagate their pro-war, pro-genocide, pro-world fascist world tyranny without any opposition.
It is therefore useful that we be suspicious of Wikileaks, for when they do try to kill the internet because of something that Wikileaks releases via The NYT etc claiming that we are also 'dangerous' because of our support for Wikileaks then that claim can be denied.
Yes, we need leaks...but real leaks. Leaks of hardcore facts, not opinions of low level diplomats. Leaks confirming standowns on 9/11. Leaks that 7/7 was an inside job. Leaks that prove the current financial crisis was planned decades ago.
But would the Mockingbird Media publish such leaks?
One of the partners of Wikileaks is The New York Times, which is Bilderberg and CFR due to its owner Arthur Ochs Sulzberger, and is also pro-war.
If the kill switch is used on the internet it will be to give the internet to news organisations such as The NYT so that they and their Mockingbird kinsfolk can propagate their pro-war, pro-genocide, pro-world fascist world tyranny without any opposition.
It is therefore useful that we be suspicious of Wikileaks, for when they do try to kill the internet because of something that Wikileaks releases via The NYT etc claiming that we are also 'dangerous' because of our support for Wikileaks then that claim can be denied.
Yes, we need leaks...but real leaks. Leaks of hardcore facts, not opinions of low level diplomats. Leaks confirming standowns on 9/11. Leaks that 7/7 was an inside job. Leaks that prove the current financial crisis was planned decades ago.
But would the Mockingbird Media publish such leaks?
SOROS TELLS EUROPE TO SAVE THE BANKS NOT THE NATIONS TO SAVE THE EU
The undead George Soros, the man who nearly bankrupted this nation and made a billion in the process (and still survives, but only just), has now told the EU to save the banks not the nations of the EU. He appears to be very concerned that the EU project may fail if the banks are not recapitalised immediately. The point is that if the current Euro crisis is not resolved quickly then the constituent nations of the EU could leave the Euro and thus destroy decades of Bilderberg manipulation in creating one of the main stepping stones to world government.
Where the "emergency funds" come from that Soros proposes is not stated, but I can guess it will be the IMF, the Bilderberg sister organisation to the EU and part of the coming world government apparatus that stated that it wants to run the global economy and will do so very soon.
Soros does show some humanity (if a vampire can do so) in recognising that dumping the debts of private banks onto the taxpayer is "politically unacceptable", but perhaps if taxpayer anger had not been so overt then he may be quite happy to dump private debts onto taxpayers. On the other hand, if the IMF wants to run the world (perhaps with the inglorious Gordon Brown at the helm) then bankrupting nations is required to 'persuade' them (with a gun to their head) to accept IMF bailouts.
And where would the IMF get the money for the bailouts? It would create it out of nothing, something that sovereign nation states could and should do so that they are not beholden to an organisation hell bent on imposing fascist austerity on behalf of the banks that caused the current financial crisis in the first place!
They fink weer styoopid.
[source : Europe should rescue banks before states, The FT, 14/12/2010]
Where the "emergency funds" come from that Soros proposes is not stated, but I can guess it will be the IMF, the Bilderberg sister organisation to the EU and part of the coming world government apparatus that stated that it wants to run the global economy and will do so very soon.
Soros does show some humanity (if a vampire can do so) in recognising that dumping the debts of private banks onto the taxpayer is "politically unacceptable", but perhaps if taxpayer anger had not been so overt then he may be quite happy to dump private debts onto taxpayers. On the other hand, if the IMF wants to run the world (perhaps with the inglorious Gordon Brown at the helm) then bankrupting nations is required to 'persuade' them (with a gun to their head) to accept IMF bailouts.
And where would the IMF get the money for the bailouts? It would create it out of nothing, something that sovereign nation states could and should do so that they are not beholden to an organisation hell bent on imposing fascist austerity on behalf of the banks that caused the current financial crisis in the first place!
They fink weer styoopid.
[source : Europe should rescue banks before states, The FT, 14/12/2010]
PEACE MAY BE NEAR NOW THAT HOLBROOKE IS DEAD
Soetoro now has a great opportunity for change now that Richard Holbrooke is dead.
Holbrooke was no diplomat, as the Nazi BBC is implying today.
Holbrooke was a warmonger of the lowest form.
During the war in 2008 that was started deliberately by Georgia it was Holbrooke who called for all out war on Russia.
Holbrooke, with Kissinger, also drove the genocide in East Timor.
Do not shed a tear for Holbrooke. The world is a teeny weeny bit safer today. Under Holbrooke the US and NATO have been bombing and killing the civilians of Pakistan and Afghanistan in order to fuel the Jihad. NATO needs a Jihad to stay in the region to protect and facilitate the opium trade, and to create more Jihadis to come over here to create terror so that the police state can be implemented.
But sadly the decision on who his replacement will be is left to a fake Nobel Peace Prize winner, President Obama, so we can expect another warmonger.
Holbrooke was no diplomat, as the Nazi BBC is implying today.
Holbrooke was a warmonger of the lowest form.
During the war in 2008 that was started deliberately by Georgia it was Holbrooke who called for all out war on Russia.
Holbrooke, with Kissinger, also drove the genocide in East Timor.
Do not shed a tear for Holbrooke. The world is a teeny weeny bit safer today. Under Holbrooke the US and NATO have been bombing and killing the civilians of Pakistan and Afghanistan in order to fuel the Jihad. NATO needs a Jihad to stay in the region to protect and facilitate the opium trade, and to create more Jihadis to come over here to create terror so that the police state can be implemented.
But sadly the decision on who his replacement will be is left to a fake Nobel Peace Prize winner, President Obama, so we can expect another warmonger.
Sunday, December 12, 2010
WIKILEAKS DOES LITVINENKO
There is a cable in the latest Wikileaks releases that raises some very grave and interesting questions.
Readers of this blog should by now be aware that I am deeply scpetical of Wikileaks and the way it is being used by the Mockingbird Media. Assange may be just a useful idiot (he believes 9/11 was run by a man in a cave on a dialysis machine) and unaware that our media is mockingbird. His relationship with The Guardian (which pushed the Green Nazi agenda at Copenhagen last year), The New York Times (pro-war and Bilderberg) and Der Spiegel (German Mockingbird and Gladio) does not show him in a good light, and implies that Assange is naive at best.
I do not know if Wikileaks released all the anti-Russia cables on the day before FIFA awarded the World Cup 2018, but it was intriguing to say the least that such cables regurgitating the usual smears were published on that day. But who does the leaking and who does the publishing? The Mockingbird Media does the publishing.
Which brings me onto this latest leak referring to the radioactive and photogenic death of Alexander Litvinenko in 2006.
In this latest leak it is claimed that
[source : http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/us-embassy-cables-documents/90864?intcmp=239]
To me this implies that Russia knew who was smuggling the stuff, but it also implies that the British did too!
So if the British knew who the smugglers were then why have they not arrested the smugglers on suspicion of murder?
Yes, they claimed that Andrei Lugovoi was the killer, yet Lugovoi was photographed with his family just hours after he had allegedly poisoned Litvinenko by sprinkling Polonium-210 into some tea, thus risking the lives of his family. Lugovoi was also not a trained assassin, as far as we know, and definitely not in the skilled use of nuclear material as tools of assassination.
This claim may well be bogus and unsubstantiated, but the claim was definitely made, and in a diplomatic situation, and to a man with serious links directly into the heart of the US intelligence community and State Department, Henry Crumpton.
And the claim was made by Russian Special Presidential Representative Anatoliy Safonov.
You also have to recall all the many allegations that have been made against Putin and Russia.
Lugovoi was an ex-bodyguard meeting with Litvinenko on some business, and claims that British Intelligence tried to recruit him to dig up some dirt on Putin for Litvinenko. Lugovoi refused.
When Anna Politkovskaya was murdered, who in the Mockingbird Media was the prime suspect? Putin. Why? Because according to them she was murdered on his birthday and it was a birthday present. But now even the newspaper that Politkovskaya believes that Putin had nothing to do with her murder.
A recent allegation against Putin is that he has secretly divorced his wife and hooked up with a young and flexible female gymnast.
In the morning of August 8th 2008 shortly after the tie-munching Soros agent Saakashvili had bombed South Ossetian civilians to death while they slept in their beds, who did the Mockingbird Media blame? Russia.
The list of allegations is long, and generally false.
Russia is no saint, but when you have a New World Order in the Anglo-American-Venetian Establishment that we have, cheering on mock human sacrifices at the faggy Bohemian Grove, engineering world wars and holocausts, and trying to enslave the whole world after a drastic reduction in human population, then you can't afford to be a saint.
I can believe the allegation set forth in the aformentioned cable, that Russia was tracking a nuclear material smuggling operation into Great Britain, but was told by British authorities that it was "under control".
I am not saying I believe it to be the only possible explanation, but putting the assassination into the context of all the other allegations, I think it deserves some investigation, and immediately.
Who was tracking the smuggling operation, on both the British and Russian sides?
Who was being tracked?
Was Polonium-210 one of the nuclear materials of concern?
Who made the statement that it was "under control", how, when and to whom?
Readers of this blog should by now be aware that I am deeply scpetical of Wikileaks and the way it is being used by the Mockingbird Media. Assange may be just a useful idiot (he believes 9/11 was run by a man in a cave on a dialysis machine) and unaware that our media is mockingbird. His relationship with The Guardian (which pushed the Green Nazi agenda at Copenhagen last year), The New York Times (pro-war and Bilderberg) and Der Spiegel (German Mockingbird and Gladio) does not show him in a good light, and implies that Assange is naive at best.
I do not know if Wikileaks released all the anti-Russia cables on the day before FIFA awarded the World Cup 2018, but it was intriguing to say the least that such cables regurgitating the usual smears were published on that day. But who does the leaking and who does the publishing? The Mockingbird Media does the publishing.
Which brings me onto this latest leak referring to the radioactive and photogenic death of Alexander Litvinenko in 2006.
In this latest leak it is claimed that
Russian authorities in London had known about and followed individuals moving radioactive substances into the city but were told by the British that they were under control before the poisoning took place.
[source : http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/us-embassy-cables-documents/90864?intcmp=239]
To me this implies that Russia knew who was smuggling the stuff, but it also implies that the British did too!
So if the British knew who the smugglers were then why have they not arrested the smugglers on suspicion of murder?
Yes, they claimed that Andrei Lugovoi was the killer, yet Lugovoi was photographed with his family just hours after he had allegedly poisoned Litvinenko by sprinkling Polonium-210 into some tea, thus risking the lives of his family. Lugovoi was also not a trained assassin, as far as we know, and definitely not in the skilled use of nuclear material as tools of assassination.
This claim may well be bogus and unsubstantiated, but the claim was definitely made, and in a diplomatic situation, and to a man with serious links directly into the heart of the US intelligence community and State Department, Henry Crumpton.
And the claim was made by Russian Special Presidential Representative Anatoliy Safonov.
You also have to recall all the many allegations that have been made against Putin and Russia.
Lugovoi was an ex-bodyguard meeting with Litvinenko on some business, and claims that British Intelligence tried to recruit him to dig up some dirt on Putin for Litvinenko. Lugovoi refused.
When Anna Politkovskaya was murdered, who in the Mockingbird Media was the prime suspect? Putin. Why? Because according to them she was murdered on his birthday and it was a birthday present. But now even the newspaper that Politkovskaya believes that Putin had nothing to do with her murder.
A recent allegation against Putin is that he has secretly divorced his wife and hooked up with a young and flexible female gymnast.
In the morning of August 8th 2008 shortly after the tie-munching Soros agent Saakashvili had bombed South Ossetian civilians to death while they slept in their beds, who did the Mockingbird Media blame? Russia.
The list of allegations is long, and generally false.
Russia is no saint, but when you have a New World Order in the Anglo-American-Venetian Establishment that we have, cheering on mock human sacrifices at the faggy Bohemian Grove, engineering world wars and holocausts, and trying to enslave the whole world after a drastic reduction in human population, then you can't afford to be a saint.
I can believe the allegation set forth in the aformentioned cable, that Russia was tracking a nuclear material smuggling operation into Great Britain, but was told by British authorities that it was "under control".
I am not saying I believe it to be the only possible explanation, but putting the assassination into the context of all the other allegations, I think it deserves some investigation, and immediately.
Who was tracking the smuggling operation, on both the British and Russian sides?
Who was being tracked?
Was Polonium-210 one of the nuclear materials of concern?
Who made the statement that it was "under control", how, when and to whom?
Wednesday, December 08, 2010
THE EXTRATERRESTRIAL FACTOR
We don't need Simon Cowell's The Shitty X Factor.
But we definitely don't need the tyrannical ExtraTerrestrial Factor!
Human race get off your knees? Not so sure about the use of the lion, the animal that kills the cubs of another lion so that his progeny take over the pride, but David Icke's latest book begs one question:
How do we declare harmonic independence from the moon?
And there are different levels to harmonic.
I've always had my suspicions about the moon. As a young teenager I was that interested in astronomy that I wanted to go to university to become an astronomer. I built my own telescope to observe the Pleiades, and the stars of Orion. For some reason I always found that area of our night sky of great interest.
And of course...the moon.
Ah, the moon. Our unique satellite that only shows us the same side all the freakin' time. The moon that is hollow. The moon that creates our seasons and tides.
From whence it came is a mystery.
What purpose it serves is known to only a few.
But who gives a lunar fcuk! It's nearly the final of X Factor!
But we definitely don't need the tyrannical ExtraTerrestrial Factor!
Human race get off your knees? Not so sure about the use of the lion, the animal that kills the cubs of another lion so that his progeny take over the pride, but David Icke's latest book begs one question:
How do we declare harmonic independence from the moon?
And there are different levels to harmonic.
I've always had my suspicions about the moon. As a young teenager I was that interested in astronomy that I wanted to go to university to become an astronomer. I built my own telescope to observe the Pleiades, and the stars of Orion. For some reason I always found that area of our night sky of great interest.
And of course...the moon.
Ah, the moon. Our unique satellite that only shows us the same side all the freakin' time. The moon that is hollow. The moon that creates our seasons and tides.
From whence it came is a mystery.
What purpose it serves is known to only a few.
But who gives a lunar fcuk! It's nearly the final of X Factor!
Thursday, December 02, 2010
THE PROPOSED END GAME
Listen to this folks!
I had no idea that this interview existed.
This is exactly what I have been trying to get across was the plan; that Israel, having been created out of the two previous wars, would be used to start a devastating World War 3 with mass use of horrible powerful WMDs leaving the world vastly depopulated but virtually intact due to the nature of the WMDs (chemical, biological and neutron bombs).
The mysterious Georgia Guidestones propose a maximum human population of 500,000,000.
It also gives insight into the psyche of the sociopaths of the Spew World Order who are trying to engineer such a war and have the resources to do so because we, like complete dumb dickheads, have given them the power to create money out of nothing, a power that we as soveriegn nations can use for our benefit, not theirs.
We must dump these mofoz and their banks, take back the power to create our own money as sovereign nations and use that money to build nations we can pass onto our kids with great pride.
I had no idea that this interview existed.
This is exactly what I have been trying to get across was the plan; that Israel, having been created out of the two previous wars, would be used to start a devastating World War 3 with mass use of horrible powerful WMDs leaving the world vastly depopulated but virtually intact due to the nature of the WMDs (chemical, biological and neutron bombs).
The mysterious Georgia Guidestones propose a maximum human population of 500,000,000.
It also gives insight into the psyche of the sociopaths of the Spew World Order who are trying to engineer such a war and have the resources to do so because we, like complete dumb dickheads, have given them the power to create money out of nothing, a power that we as soveriegn nations can use for our benefit, not theirs.
We must dump these mofoz and their banks, take back the power to create our own money as sovereign nations and use that money to build nations we can pass onto our kids with great pride.
RUSSIAN WIKILEAKS DESIGNED TO BRING WORLD CUP BACK HOME TO ENGLAND AND GET ONE OVER PUTIN
If you, like me, were wondering why today of all days there was so much anti-Russia sentiment from the latest bunch of Wiki'leaks' then you should by now know.
FIFA awarded the 2018 World Cup to Russia.
Much was made that Putin did not attend the meeting in Zurich to promote the Russian bid. There was much speculation. What did his absence imply? Did Russia have it in the bag so there was no need to attend? Or did Putin not want to attend in case Russia did not win?
Before today Russia was the favourite to win anyway.
The England bid was led by David Beckham, but it also contained one William, Prince of Wales, currently the toast of England due to his engagement to Kate Middleton. Wills spoke and almost begged for the competition to be awarded to England. His plea was played over and over and over on (Nazi) BBC Radio 5 Live. How would it look if Russia under Putin won the bid, with FIFA shunning the darling Prince of the British Monarchy?
Hence today, of all days, in a desperate last attempt, the Mockingbird Media regurgitated the smears and unproven allegations relating to Russia and Putin. We were told that the 'leaks' proved that Russia is corrupt and run by criminals, that Putin "probably" knew about the photogenic radioactive murder of Litvinenko, that Russia provoked the war with Georgia in 2008, and that Putin has a multi billion dollar fortune stashed away for a rainy day. And in case we had forgotten what he looked like photos of Putin were published (just like photos of Osama bin Laden were published when an earlier set of 'leaks' showed that bin Laden was alive and well and living in Iran to trick Congress into granting tens of billions of dollars to the Pentagoons to continue the wars in the Caspian).
So there you have it folks. Todays reports in the Mockingbird Media based on the latest Wiki'leaks' were an attempt to embarrass Putin, to steal the World Cup 2018 from Russia, the big favourite to win the bid before today's decision by FIFA.
I say, chaps. What rotten luck. I guess it's back to smuggling all that Afghan opium for the Spew World Order.
FIFA awarded the 2018 World Cup to Russia.
Much was made that Putin did not attend the meeting in Zurich to promote the Russian bid. There was much speculation. What did his absence imply? Did Russia have it in the bag so there was no need to attend? Or did Putin not want to attend in case Russia did not win?
Before today Russia was the favourite to win anyway.
The England bid was led by David Beckham, but it also contained one William, Prince of Wales, currently the toast of England due to his engagement to Kate Middleton. Wills spoke and almost begged for the competition to be awarded to England. His plea was played over and over and over on (Nazi) BBC Radio 5 Live. How would it look if Russia under Putin won the bid, with FIFA shunning the darling Prince of the British Monarchy?
Hence today, of all days, in a desperate last attempt, the Mockingbird Media regurgitated the smears and unproven allegations relating to Russia and Putin. We were told that the 'leaks' proved that Russia is corrupt and run by criminals, that Putin "probably" knew about the photogenic radioactive murder of Litvinenko, that Russia provoked the war with Georgia in 2008, and that Putin has a multi billion dollar fortune stashed away for a rainy day. And in case we had forgotten what he looked like photos of Putin were published (just like photos of Osama bin Laden were published when an earlier set of 'leaks' showed that bin Laden was alive and well and living in Iran to trick Congress into granting tens of billions of dollars to the Pentagoons to continue the wars in the Caspian).
So there you have it folks. Todays reports in the Mockingbird Media based on the latest Wiki'leaks' were an attempt to embarrass Putin, to steal the World Cup 2018 from Russia, the big favourite to win the bid before today's decision by FIFA.
I say, chaps. What rotten luck. I guess it's back to smuggling all that Afghan opium for the Spew World Order.
WHY HAVE BRITISH POLICE NOT ARRESTED ASSANGE?
Apparently British Police have known the whereabouts of Assange for weeks, but have not arrested him despite his presence on Interpol's wanted list.
Of course, he may be left in peace to imply that he is being protected and is therefore an agent of someone.
But it is also possible that they do not want to actually arrest him because then the evidence would have to be revealed and tested in a public trial, and that it may be better to have this cloud of alleged rapist following him wherever he goes.
Either way, it's all very tricky.
Take your pick.
===================================
From http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1334899/WIKILEAKS-Why-Julian-Assange-arrested-British-police.html
Why haven't British police arrested WikiLeaks boss on Interpol wanted list even though they know where he is?
By David Gardner
Last updated at 11:10 AM on 2nd December 2010
Questions are being raised over why WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange isn’t under arrest tonight after police in London revealed they have known his whereabouts for more than a month.
Australian-born Assange, 39, has been hiding in plain sight in Britain despite being on Interpol’s wanted list.
The world’s biggest international police organisation took out a formal arrest warrant against the WikiLeaks boss following a request from Sweden, where he is sought on charges of rape and sexual molestation.
But Scotland Yard officers are yet to receive any official instructions to arrest him, according to reports in the UK, where Assange has been staying since the end of October.
U.S. government officials, furious over the raft of secret diplomatic cables released this week by the whistleblower website, were left wondering why Assange had not been picked up.
‘If there is an Interpol arrest warrant authorising the British police to arrest him, it is hard to see what they are waiting for,’ said one aide.
‘The inquiry into the criminal nature of the leaks is still at a preliminary stage in Washington, but Sweden clearly thinks the charges against him are serious enough for him to be extradited back there.’
© Associated Newspapers Ltd
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1334899/WIKILEAKS-Why-Julian-Assange-arrested-British-police.html#ixzz16x9fixZ2
Of course, he may be left in peace to imply that he is being protected and is therefore an agent of someone.
But it is also possible that they do not want to actually arrest him because then the evidence would have to be revealed and tested in a public trial, and that it may be better to have this cloud of alleged rapist following him wherever he goes.
Either way, it's all very tricky.
Take your pick.
===================================
From http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1334899/WIKILEAKS-Why-Julian-Assange-arrested-British-police.html
Why haven't British police arrested WikiLeaks boss on Interpol wanted list even though they know where he is?
By David Gardner
Last updated at 11:10 AM on 2nd December 2010
Questions are being raised over why WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange isn’t under arrest tonight after police in London revealed they have known his whereabouts for more than a month.
Australian-born Assange, 39, has been hiding in plain sight in Britain despite being on Interpol’s wanted list.
The world’s biggest international police organisation took out a formal arrest warrant against the WikiLeaks boss following a request from Sweden, where he is sought on charges of rape and sexual molestation.
But Scotland Yard officers are yet to receive any official instructions to arrest him, according to reports in the UK, where Assange has been staying since the end of October.
U.S. government officials, furious over the raft of secret diplomatic cables released this week by the whistleblower website, were left wondering why Assange had not been picked up.
‘If there is an Interpol arrest warrant authorising the British police to arrest him, it is hard to see what they are waiting for,’ said one aide.
‘The inquiry into the criminal nature of the leaks is still at a preliminary stage in Washington, but Sweden clearly thinks the charges against him are serious enough for him to be extradited back there.’
© Associated Newspapers Ltd
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1334899/WIKILEAKS-Why-Julian-Assange-arrested-British-police.html#ixzz16x9fixZ2
I CANNOT BELIEVE IT'S NOT 9/11
Hmm.
So Wikileaks is 'leaked' a load of data alleging (not proving) that Russia is a corrupt Mafia state, that Putin has a secret multi billion dollar fortune stashed away for retirement, that Putin "probably" knew about the photogenic radioactive murder of the MI6 agent Litvinenko, and that Russia provoked tie-munching Saakashvili to bomb South Ossetian civilians as they lay asleep in their beds so we should therefore feel sorry for the tie-muncher.
But do you not find it strange that in all these leaks not one has questioned 9/11? or Bilderberg? or the CFR? or the New World Order?
Russia and others such as Iran are very very keen to stop the opium smuggling out of Afghanistan. Before 9/11 the Taliban had almost eradicated the opium crop. But since 9/11 and the NATO invasion of Afghanistan (despite not showing the evidence on bin Laden they said they had and nine years later have still not shown the evidence), the opium crop is back to record levels and the US military is actually protecting it!!
And isn't the brother of Karzai in bed with the NATO invaders and smuggling the aforementioned opium?
Yet Wikileaks wants to reprint unproven allegations from years ago?
And why now?
When this latest lot was released the main 'leak' was that Iran had purchased some long range missiles from North Korea. It has since been quietly stated that there is no proof that such a purchase was made and that even if it had the missiles were unoperational. But it still scared the shit of a large percentage of the Western world, particularly as the US Navy was running joint operations with South Korea.
If Wikileaks wants to leak some real devastating information then get some data that indicates that 9/11 was an inside job.
Ooops. I forgot Assange believes 9/11 was run by a man in a cave on a dialysis machine, so that's not gonna happen.
So Wikileaks is 'leaked' a load of data alleging (not proving) that Russia is a corrupt Mafia state, that Putin has a secret multi billion dollar fortune stashed away for retirement, that Putin "probably" knew about the photogenic radioactive murder of the MI6 agent Litvinenko, and that Russia provoked tie-munching Saakashvili to bomb South Ossetian civilians as they lay asleep in their beds so we should therefore feel sorry for the tie-muncher.
But do you not find it strange that in all these leaks not one has questioned 9/11? or Bilderberg? or the CFR? or the New World Order?
Russia and others such as Iran are very very keen to stop the opium smuggling out of Afghanistan. Before 9/11 the Taliban had almost eradicated the opium crop. But since 9/11 and the NATO invasion of Afghanistan (despite not showing the evidence on bin Laden they said they had and nine years later have still not shown the evidence), the opium crop is back to record levels and the US military is actually protecting it!!
And isn't the brother of Karzai in bed with the NATO invaders and smuggling the aforementioned opium?
Yet Wikileaks wants to reprint unproven allegations from years ago?
And why now?
When this latest lot was released the main 'leak' was that Iran had purchased some long range missiles from North Korea. It has since been quietly stated that there is no proof that such a purchase was made and that even if it had the missiles were unoperational. But it still scared the shit of a large percentage of the Western world, particularly as the US Navy was running joint operations with South Korea.
If Wikileaks wants to leak some real devastating information then get some data that indicates that 9/11 was an inside job.
Ooops. I forgot Assange believes 9/11 was run by a man in a cave on a dialysis machine, so that's not gonna happen.
Wednesday, December 01, 2010
THE WAR ON MERVYN KING
On 25th October this year in a speech he gave in New York City, Mervyn King, the Governor of the Bank of England, said the following
King has made known his apparent anger at the banks and the banking system.
So what do we find in the current bunch of Wikileaks? That King privately criticised Oik and Our Dave as being out of their depth, a comment that was apparently made to Louis Susman.
Needless to say, there are calls for Mervyn King to resign or be sacked.
Of all the many ways of organising banking, the worst is the one we have today.
King has made known his apparent anger at the banks and the banking system.
So what do we find in the current bunch of Wikileaks? That King privately criticised Oik and Our Dave as being out of their depth, a comment that was apparently made to Louis Susman.
Needless to say, there are calls for Mervyn King to resign or be sacked.
THE NAZI BBC
I am horrified at BBC Radio 5 Live this morning. The Victoria Derbyshire Show has this morning looked at the case of Tony Nicklinson. Tony has locked-in syndrome, and he and his wife Jane are campaigning for a change in the law so that Jane can assist Tony to commit suicide without Jane being prosecuted for murder.
The main reason why Tony wishes to commit suicide is that he believes his quality of life is so low that he thinks it is not worth living.
With the savage cuts in public finances in the pipeline, as a consequence of the reckless behaviour of the banks that financed and collaborated with the Nazis, specifically J P Morgan Chase and the cabal of banks controlled by Bilderberg and the Rothschild Inter Alpha Group, there will be growing pressure on the aged, the infirm, the weak, the sick and the disabled to feel that either (1) they are a burden, or (2) their quality of life is so low that they will wish to leave this world. For the Nazi bankers who caused this financial crisis, this would be heaven.
There is an obvious campaign to drastically reduce human population. You saw it in that sicko video produced for 10:10 by Tony Curtis; anyone who disagreed with the bogus theory of manmade global warming is fair game for blowing up without trial. The Nazi green movement is financed by the same banks and bankers who caused the current financial crisis.
But how can these banks and bankers cause so much chaos, and finance whatever political movement they want to achieve their tyrannical dictatorship over a drastically reduced microchipped human population? Because they can create money out of nothing, out of thin air, and we as a sovereign nation cannot and do not! Thus we are servants to the lenders.
So why does the Victoria Derbyshire Show not address this simple question of who controls our money supply, and then look at the campaign of Positive Money who wish to change the law so that we, this quasi-sovereign nation of the United Kingdom, creates its own money instead of depending on megalomaniac Nazi bankers, who have clearly shown that they are unworthy of the power of creating money out of nothing.
By creating our own money, we as a nation would have so much more money to spend on developing our nation, and also providing much better health care. We will never achieve utopia, but we would have a much better nation, one to be proud of, instead of this shithole.
The main reason why Tony wishes to commit suicide is that he believes his quality of life is so low that he thinks it is not worth living.
With the savage cuts in public finances in the pipeline, as a consequence of the reckless behaviour of the banks that financed and collaborated with the Nazis, specifically J P Morgan Chase and the cabal of banks controlled by Bilderberg and the Rothschild Inter Alpha Group, there will be growing pressure on the aged, the infirm, the weak, the sick and the disabled to feel that either (1) they are a burden, or (2) their quality of life is so low that they will wish to leave this world. For the Nazi bankers who caused this financial crisis, this would be heaven.
There is an obvious campaign to drastically reduce human population. You saw it in that sicko video produced for 10:10 by Tony Curtis; anyone who disagreed with the bogus theory of manmade global warming is fair game for blowing up without trial. The Nazi green movement is financed by the same banks and bankers who caused the current financial crisis.
But how can these banks and bankers cause so much chaos, and finance whatever political movement they want to achieve their tyrannical dictatorship over a drastically reduced microchipped human population? Because they can create money out of nothing, out of thin air, and we as a sovereign nation cannot and do not! Thus we are servants to the lenders.
So why does the Victoria Derbyshire Show not address this simple question of who controls our money supply, and then look at the campaign of Positive Money who wish to change the law so that we, this quasi-sovereign nation of the United Kingdom, creates its own money instead of depending on megalomaniac Nazi bankers, who have clearly shown that they are unworthy of the power of creating money out of nothing.
By creating our own money, we as a nation would have so much more money to spend on developing our nation, and also providing much better health care. We will never achieve utopia, but we would have a much better nation, one to be proud of, instead of this shithole.
Saturday, November 27, 2010
WHO IS THE MOST DANGEROUS PERSON IN THE WORLD?
For years I have believed that you, sovereign independent unmicrochipped you, are the most dangerous person in the world. You still have the ability and capacity to first comprehend what is going on with money and its issuance and the present rush towards a tyrannical world government, but then more importantly do something about it.
But I have sadly come to the conclusion that the most dangerous person in the world is...Simon Cowell.
He must stop that useless, boring, unentertaining X Factor immediately.
It is distracting too many people at a critical time in human history.
The slots currently allocated to X Factor can then be used to show Money As Debt, The Money Masters, Secrets of Oz, etc.
But I have sadly come to the conclusion that the most dangerous person in the world is...Simon Cowell.
He must stop that useless, boring, unentertaining X Factor immediately.
It is distracting too many people at a critical time in human history.
The slots currently allocated to X Factor can then be used to show Money As Debt, The Money Masters, Secrets of Oz, etc.
JIM CORR ISSUES CALL FOR MASS IRISH PROTEST
This is a passionate and accurate call for mass protest by the Irish people against the financial attack on Ireland.
Jim correctly calls for a national bank to issue debt free money for the nation of Ireland, and stop the senseless and suicidal borrowing from brutal megalomaniacs whose intent is tyrannical world government.
Jim Corr for Taoiseach!
Jim correctly calls for a national bank to issue debt free money for the nation of Ireland, and stop the senseless and suicidal borrowing from brutal megalomaniacs whose intent is tyrannical world government.
Jim Corr for Taoiseach!
Monday, November 22, 2010
IT IS MONDAY SO IT MUST BE ROTHSCHILDS IN NEED DAY
Let's be a bit more specific.
Not all banks are in need.
AIB is in desperate need to repay its foreign loans. But who does AIB owe? It is RBS.
Both AIB and RBS are members of the Rothschild Inter Alpha Group.
We bought up RBS after it had been inflated to become the largest bank in the world in terms of assets, and then run into the ground by Bilderbergers Sir Peter Sutherland and Sir Tom McKillop. There is now talk of AIB also being nationalised.
Fortunately the UK is not under the jackboot of the IMF, but we also face the prospect of severe austerity, with millions dumped onto the dole, millions to lose their homes and a great persecution and dying of the weak, the sick and the infirm. This is why assisted suicide has been pushed recently. We are living under the same families who deliberately created Hitler and all his eugenics and T4 programs for war. The Duke of Edinburgh wants to be reincarnated as a deadly virus to vastly reduce human population. The UN Biodiversity Assessment proposed a maximum human population of 1 billion. The mysterious Georgia Guidestones propose a maximum human population of 1/2 billion.
The most important fact to learn today is that there is a cabal on this planet who want you dead. They've been at it for centuries with Malthus, then Darwin, then Hitler, then the Club of Rome/Green Movement. None have worked, so it's the severe austerity program for us, while they bathe in luxury.
Mass unemployment, homelessness, hunger. That's our lot.
Unless we bang this lot up in prison and start creating our own money.
We can all start again, create our own money, as much of it as we want and build a nation we can be extremely proud of.
Not all banks are in need.
AIB is in desperate need to repay its foreign loans. But who does AIB owe? It is RBS.
Both AIB and RBS are members of the Rothschild Inter Alpha Group.
We bought up RBS after it had been inflated to become the largest bank in the world in terms of assets, and then run into the ground by Bilderbergers Sir Peter Sutherland and Sir Tom McKillop. There is now talk of AIB also being nationalised.
Fortunately the UK is not under the jackboot of the IMF, but we also face the prospect of severe austerity, with millions dumped onto the dole, millions to lose their homes and a great persecution and dying of the weak, the sick and the infirm. This is why assisted suicide has been pushed recently. We are living under the same families who deliberately created Hitler and all his eugenics and T4 programs for war. The Duke of Edinburgh wants to be reincarnated as a deadly virus to vastly reduce human population. The UN Biodiversity Assessment proposed a maximum human population of 1 billion. The mysterious Georgia Guidestones propose a maximum human population of 1/2 billion.
The most important fact to learn today is that there is a cabal on this planet who want you dead. They've been at it for centuries with Malthus, then Darwin, then Hitler, then the Club of Rome/Green Movement. None have worked, so it's the severe austerity program for us, while they bathe in luxury.
Mass unemployment, homelessness, hunger. That's our lot.
Unless we bang this lot up in prison and start creating our own money.
We can all start again, create our own money, as much of it as we want and build a nation we can be extremely proud of.
Saturday, November 20, 2010
IT IS STILL BANKERS IN NEED DAY
£18 million for those children that are still need?
Well, they can wait for another year.
Meanwhile, every day is Bankers in Need Day.
Today is Bankers in Need Day.
Tomorrow is Bankers in Need Day.
Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, Saturday and Sunday of every week of every month are all Bankers in Need Day.
Until you tell them otherwise, every day is Bankers in Need Day, because they will suck you dry and have you pay for your own slavery.
Well, they can wait for another year.
Meanwhile, every day is Bankers in Need Day.
Today is Bankers in Need Day.
Tomorrow is Bankers in Need Day.
Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, Saturday and Sunday of every week of every month are all Bankers in Need Day.
Until you tell them otherwise, every day is Bankers in Need Day, because they will suck you dry and have you pay for your own slavery.
Friday, November 19, 2010
DON'T FORGET TO BAIL OUT THE BANKERS TONIGHT
Today is Children in Need Day, and folks have been upto their charitable works, raising tens of millions for just that, children in need.
But don't forget to throw a few spare coppers to the people in real desperate need, the bankers. Because every day is Bankers in Need Day. And they need not tens of millions, not even tens of billions, but easily hundreds of billions, and likely trillions.
So do not waste a penny. Give to the Bankers in Need today, and give with a smile. Go on. You know you want to.
We can create hundreds of billions to bail out the banks, just like that.
But for whatever reason, no matter how hard we try, we just can't seem to bail the children out of need.
What a pathetic species we are.
But don't forget to throw a few spare coppers to the people in real desperate need, the bankers. Because every day is Bankers in Need Day. And they need not tens of millions, not even tens of billions, but easily hundreds of billions, and likely trillions.
So do not waste a penny. Give to the Bankers in Need today, and give with a smile. Go on. You know you want to.
We can create hundreds of billions to bail out the banks, just like that.
But for whatever reason, no matter how hard we try, we just can't seem to bail the children out of need.
What a pathetic species we are.
BILDERBERG IMF CHIEF CALLS FOR EUROPEAN STATES TO CEDE MORE SOVEREIGNTY TO SOLVE FINANCIAL CRISIS
Well, would you Adam 'n Eve it?
Following the recent statement ofGollum van Rompuy that the nation state is now dead, one of his kinsfolk, Bilderberg's very own MD of the IMF Dominique Strauss-Kahn, has called on European states to cede yet more sovereignty.
But cede it to what?
Strauss-Kahn is apparently calling for a body that is 'independent' of the EU and yet at the centre of the EU. Is he suggesting a mini-IMF for the EU alone, or a branch of the IMF in the heart of Europe?
[source : IMF chief Dominique Strauss-Kahn urges leaders to cede more sovereignty to EU, The Daily Telegraph, 19/11/2010]
Following the recent statement of
But cede it to what?
Strauss-Kahn is apparently calling for a body that is 'independent' of the EU and yet at the centre of the EU. Is he suggesting a mini-IMF for the EU alone, or a branch of the IMF in the heart of Europe?
"The wheels of co-operation move too slowly. The centre must seize the initiative in all areas key to reaching the common destiny of the union, especially in financial, economic and social policy. Countries must be willing to cede more authority to the centre...The sovereign crisis is not over...The area’s institutions were simply not up to the task of managing a crisis – even setting up a temporary solution proved to be a drawn-out process. One [solution] is to shift the main responsibility for enforcement of fiscal discipline and key structural reforms away from the Council. This would minimize the risk of narrow national interests interfering with effective implementation of the common rules."
[source : IMF chief Dominique Strauss-Kahn urges leaders to cede more sovereignty to EU, The Daily Telegraph, 19/11/2010]
ROTHSCHILD RISKS
We know for a fact that the EU is a Bilderberg project.
So why would the Rothschilds through their Inter Alpha Group risk bringing the EU project down through all this gambling with financial derivatives? I mean, we are talking hundreds of billions in bailouts across Europe alone.
Well, one answer is that they expected to win in their fixed casino, but somehow it's all gone wrong, and that the problem with Ireland, for example, is just one unexpected error, as huge as it may be.
But another answer is that they did it on purpose. The IMF wants to control the global economy, and very soon. But the EU is supposed to contain some of the wealthiest nations on the planet. So how can you get the IMF into those wealthier countries to control them? Well, you could bring their banking and financial systems to their knees, via a coordinated scam, and then send in the IMF to the rescue. That scam involves at least two branches;
1. integrate European nations into a single bloc of cooperating and converging nations, legally bound by a treaty (in this case The Treaty of Lisbon) that they must honour,
2. create a group of banks cooperating across national borders to bring havoc to the single bloc of cooperating nations by placing bets which are called financial derivatives.
I personally do not believe that the Rothschilds, as greedy as they are, would jeopardise the EU by unnecessary risk-taking.
I am much more persuaded by the "they did it on purpose" answer. The IMF, currently run by Bilderberger Dominique Strauss-Kahn, has publicly stated that it is preparing to control the whole global economy. Gordon Brown, our inglorious former PM and graduate of the Bilderberg Class of 1991, who arguably single-handedly caused the current crisis with the creation of the FSA and light-touch regulation of the City of London, argued for a new global financial architecture and is in the running to become the next MD of the IMF. Most of the MDs of the IMF have been Bilderberg.
The IMF is on the march into Europe.
It is the British Empire in disguise.
So why would the Rothschilds through their Inter Alpha Group risk bringing the EU project down through all this gambling with financial derivatives? I mean, we are talking hundreds of billions in bailouts across Europe alone.
Well, one answer is that they expected to win in their fixed casino, but somehow it's all gone wrong, and that the problem with Ireland, for example, is just one unexpected error, as huge as it may be.
But another answer is that they did it on purpose. The IMF wants to control the global economy, and very soon. But the EU is supposed to contain some of the wealthiest nations on the planet. So how can you get the IMF into those wealthier countries to control them? Well, you could bring their banking and financial systems to their knees, via a coordinated scam, and then send in the IMF to the rescue. That scam involves at least two branches;
1. integrate European nations into a single bloc of cooperating and converging nations, legally bound by a treaty (in this case The Treaty of Lisbon) that they must honour,
2. create a group of banks cooperating across national borders to bring havoc to the single bloc of cooperating nations by placing bets which are called financial derivatives.
I personally do not believe that the Rothschilds, as greedy as they are, would jeopardise the EU by unnecessary risk-taking.
I am much more persuaded by the "they did it on purpose" answer. The IMF, currently run by Bilderberger Dominique Strauss-Kahn, has publicly stated that it is preparing to control the whole global economy. Gordon Brown, our inglorious former PM and graduate of the Bilderberg Class of 1991, who arguably single-handedly caused the current crisis with the creation of the FSA and light-touch regulation of the City of London, argued for a new global financial architecture and is in the running to become the next MD of the IMF. Most of the MDs of the IMF have been Bilderberg.
The IMF is on the march into Europe.
It is the British Empire in disguise.
NO SURRENDER TO THE IMF
No surrender
No surrender
No surrender to the IMF
Ireland must not surrender to the IMF.
Ireland must break from the Eurozone and regain its national sovereignty.
Ireland was told a pack of lies so it would vote for the Treaty of Lisbon.
No surrender
No surrender
No surrender to the IMF
No surrender
No surrender to the IMF
Ireland must not surrender to the IMF.
Ireland must break from the Eurozone and regain its national sovereignty.
Ireland was told a pack of lies so it would vote for the Treaty of Lisbon.
No surrender
No surrender
No surrender to the IMF
Thursday, November 18, 2010
NOT SO FAST, NORMAN,
Norman Tebbit has a dig at Ken Clarke in The Daily Telegraph today.
Clarke, the inglorious Churchill Insurance dog look-alike, is a Bilderberger, with so much Bilderberg blood running through his veins that he sat on the Steering Committee for several years. And as we know, the EU is a Bilderberg project to construct one continental bloc subservient to a world government, with similar supranational organisations across the world such as the African Union, the North American Union, the Asia-Pacific Union etc etc ad nauseum.
But Tebbit is also a Bilderberger. He attended only once, he admits, just to see what it was all about.
[source : Britain is in crisis. If he wins, Dave will have more to worry about than forcing 'Cameron Cuties' on the grassroots, The Daily Telegraph, 19/02/2010]
Tebbit is now claiming that he told our currenttraitor Minister for Justice that the Euro project would end in distaster, so now Tebbit is gloating at the fate of Ireland and the presumed fate of other nations in the Eurozone.
[source : I told Ken Clarke that the euro project would end in disaster. It seems I was right, The Daily Telegraph, 18/11/2010]
What Tebbit fails to mention is the IMF factor. Tebbit fails to recognise the global aspect of the EU, that it is just one project of several designed to usurp national sovereignty. I think Tebbit thinks the EU is now dead. But the EU PresidentGollum van Rompuy, who was elected by Bilderberg but not by the 300 million EU citizens, recently stated that the nation state is dead. The IMF today made Ireland an offer it can't refuse, with a bailout of 100 billion Euros. That is how serious they are about saving the Eurozone and thus the EU. And they'll do the same for Spain, Portugal and whoever else is in trouble.
It is blindingly obvious that there would be problems with converging the economies of over twenty nations occupied by 300 million citizens. But Tebbit does not seem to recognise just how serious these one world megalomaniac fools are.
They engineered two world wars to get a world government established, and have so far not quite achieved the goal. The UN does have some global authority but it is not the one world dictatorship that the serious Bilderbergers want.
They want our quiet and grateful consent. This current crisis is designed to create further global governance. And if we don't give it, then they'll try the conquest plan, which is a major war centred on attack and/or invasion of Iran.
THESE FUCKERS MEAN BUSINESS!
This is no time to gloat. They must be stopped.
And it would help if you publicly stated on your blog what was said at the Bilderberg meeting that you attended.
And as for Ken Clarke. Ken, do you want to betray our nation to a one world dictatorship run by the banks and warmongers who engineered 9/11 and all the major wars of the 20th Century?
Clarke, the inglorious Churchill Insurance dog look-alike, is a Bilderberger, with so much Bilderberg blood running through his veins that he sat on the Steering Committee for several years. And as we know, the EU is a Bilderberg project to construct one continental bloc subservient to a world government, with similar supranational organisations across the world such as the African Union, the North American Union, the Asia-Pacific Union etc etc ad nauseum.
But Tebbit is also a Bilderberger. He attended only once, he admits, just to see what it was all about.
I did go to one Bilderberg meeting (on the advice of my officials that I should know what it was all about). I was never invited to another – which tells you something about both the Bilderbergers and me.
[source : Britain is in crisis. If he wins, Dave will have more to worry about than forcing 'Cameron Cuties' on the grassroots, The Daily Telegraph, 19/02/2010]
Tebbit is now claiming that he told our current
It was back in the mid 1990s that I argued with Ken Clarke, an enthusiast for the euro, that it could not last unless the EU states adopting it gave up their central banks, finance ministers, and powers over taxation and spending to a single European authority. If that was not done, I reckoned that within 10 to 20 years there would be a crisis in the eurozone, as the economies of member states diverged.
[source : I told Ken Clarke that the euro project would end in disaster. It seems I was right, The Daily Telegraph, 18/11/2010]
What Tebbit fails to mention is the IMF factor. Tebbit fails to recognise the global aspect of the EU, that it is just one project of several designed to usurp national sovereignty. I think Tebbit thinks the EU is now dead. But the EU President
It is blindingly obvious that there would be problems with converging the economies of over twenty nations occupied by 300 million citizens. But Tebbit does not seem to recognise just how serious these one world megalomaniac fools are.
They engineered two world wars to get a world government established, and have so far not quite achieved the goal. The UN does have some global authority but it is not the one world dictatorship that the serious Bilderbergers want.
They want our quiet and grateful consent. This current crisis is designed to create further global governance. And if we don't give it, then they'll try the conquest plan, which is a major war centred on attack and/or invasion of Iran.
THESE FUCKERS MEAN BUSINESS!
This is no time to gloat. They must be stopped.
And it would help if you publicly stated on your blog what was said at the Bilderberg meeting that you attended.
And as for Ken Clarke. Ken, do you want to betray our nation to a one world dictatorship run by the banks and warmongers who engineered 9/11 and all the major wars of the 20th Century?
REPOST : THE IMF IS PLANNING TO CONTROL THE WORLD ECONOMY
In April 2009 The Bilderberg Washington Post reported that the IMF was actively planning for a time in the not too distant future when it would control the global economy. When that time came it would have much power than it does now.
Today it made Ireland an offer it can't refuse.
?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!
From http://thetruthserumblog.blogspot.com/2009/04/imf-is-planning-to-control-world.html
THE IMF IS PLANNING TO CONTROL THE WORLD ECONOMY
A report in The Bilderberg Washington Post today suggests that the IMF is actively planning and organising for a time, just a few years from now, when it will control the world economy.
The report, entitled "A Bigger, Bolder Role Is Imagined For the IMF", also suggests that the IMF would be less ideological. I find this very, very hard to believe. For decades the IMF has been notorious for intervening in economies across the world offering help but in return those economies had to undergo substantial opening up to American and European corporations and implementing severe cuts in social welfare such as health and education.
Three weeks ago the IMF was given a significant injection of money at the G20 London Summit.
The Managing Director of the IMF is Dominique Strauss-Kahn, who attended Bilderberg in 2000 and became MD of the IMF in 2007 with very strong support from the USA and Europe. Within months he was under investigation.
========================
From http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/04/19/AR2009041902242.html?hpid=topnews
A Bigger, Bolder Role Is Imagined For the IMF
Changes Suggest Shift in How Global Economy Is Run
By Anthony Faiola
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, April 20, 2009
Inside a cavernous assembly hall in downtown Washington, dignitaries gather twice a year for routine meetings of the International Monetary Fund. Before long, though, the room could take center stage in the IMF's transformation into a veritable United Nations for the global economy.
Surrounded by blond wood paneling and a digital screen the size of a cinema's, central bankers and finance ministers would meet to convene a financial security council of sorts. Serving almost as ambassadors to the IMF, they would debate ways to put out the world's economic fires and stifle reckless policies before they ignite new ones.
Bowing to a new economic world order, the IMF would grant fresh powers to the likes of China, India and Brazil. It would have vastly expanded authority to act as a global banker to governments rich and poor. And with more flexibility to effectively print its own money, it would have the ability to inject liquidity into global markets in a way once limited to major central banks, including the U.S. Federal Reserve.
That image of a radically transformed IMF -- whose role in the global economy had turned largely advisory in recent years -- is now coming together through internal IMF documents, interviews and think-tank reports. Finance ministers from major nations will begin grappling with the formidable details of the IMF's makeover this weekend when they converge in Washington for the fund's biannual assembly.
The changes, broadly outlined by President Obama and other leaders of the Group of 20 nations in London earlier this month, could take months, even years to take shape. But the IMF is all but certain to take a central role in managing the world economy. As a result, Washington is poised to become the power center for global financial policy, much as the United Nations has long made New York the world center for diplomacy.
The IMF's mission is expanding so broadly that its managing director, Dominique Strauss-Kahn, said in an interview that the organization -- which underwent deep cuts last year before the financial crisis swept the globe -- may boost staffing in coming months, potentially creating dozens of high-paying jobs in the District.
Today it made Ireland an offer it can't refuse.
?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!
From http://thetruthserumblog.blogspot.com/2009/04/imf-is-planning-to-control-world.html
THE IMF IS PLANNING TO CONTROL THE WORLD ECONOMY
A report in The Bilderberg Washington Post today suggests that the IMF is actively planning and organising for a time, just a few years from now, when it will control the world economy.
The report, entitled "A Bigger, Bolder Role Is Imagined For the IMF", also suggests that the IMF would be less ideological. I find this very, very hard to believe. For decades the IMF has been notorious for intervening in economies across the world offering help but in return those economies had to undergo substantial opening up to American and European corporations and implementing severe cuts in social welfare such as health and education.
Three weeks ago the IMF was given a significant injection of money at the G20 London Summit.
The Managing Director of the IMF is Dominique Strauss-Kahn, who attended Bilderberg in 2000 and became MD of the IMF in 2007 with very strong support from the USA and Europe. Within months he was under investigation.
========================
From http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/04/19/AR2009041902242.html?hpid=topnews
A Bigger, Bolder Role Is Imagined For the IMF
Changes Suggest Shift in How Global Economy Is Run
By Anthony Faiola
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, April 20, 2009
Inside a cavernous assembly hall in downtown Washington, dignitaries gather twice a year for routine meetings of the International Monetary Fund. Before long, though, the room could take center stage in the IMF's transformation into a veritable United Nations for the global economy.
Surrounded by blond wood paneling and a digital screen the size of a cinema's, central bankers and finance ministers would meet to convene a financial security council of sorts. Serving almost as ambassadors to the IMF, they would debate ways to put out the world's economic fires and stifle reckless policies before they ignite new ones.
Bowing to a new economic world order, the IMF would grant fresh powers to the likes of China, India and Brazil. It would have vastly expanded authority to act as a global banker to governments rich and poor. And with more flexibility to effectively print its own money, it would have the ability to inject liquidity into global markets in a way once limited to major central banks, including the U.S. Federal Reserve.
That image of a radically transformed IMF -- whose role in the global economy had turned largely advisory in recent years -- is now coming together through internal IMF documents, interviews and think-tank reports. Finance ministers from major nations will begin grappling with the formidable details of the IMF's makeover this weekend when they converge in Washington for the fund's biannual assembly.
The changes, broadly outlined by President Obama and other leaders of the Group of 20 nations in London earlier this month, could take months, even years to take shape. But the IMF is all but certain to take a central role in managing the world economy. As a result, Washington is poised to become the power center for global financial policy, much as the United Nations has long made New York the world center for diplomacy.
The IMF's mission is expanding so broadly that its managing director, Dominique Strauss-Kahn, said in an interview that the organization -- which underwent deep cuts last year before the financial crisis swept the globe -- may boost staffing in coming months, potentially creating dozens of high-paying jobs in the District.
MI6 IS DIRECTING EU FOREIGN POLICY
Senior veteran EU diplomats believe that MI6 is directing EU foreign policy. These diplomats believe that the inexperienced Baroness Ashton is being advised by Robert Cooper who is a close friend of MI6 chief John Sawers.
[source : Britain's MI6 to divert EU foreign policy, Press TV, 18/11/2010]
Both Cooper and Sawers are Governors of The Ditchley Foundation, which looks like a nest of New World Order vipers; Lord Carrington, Lord Kerr, a number of Bilderbergers, some suspects in the Iraq dodgy dossier saga, bankers from Goldman Sachs and Warburg, etc.
However, Britain's intelligence agency is using the inexperienced Ashton to run the EU foreign policy. Veteran EU diplomats firmly believe that Lady Ashton's deputy [Robert] Cooper is acting as the EU's shadow foreign policy chief. Cooper is a close friend of the MI6 chief John Sawers.
[source : Britain's MI6 to divert EU foreign policy, Press TV, 18/11/2010]
Both Cooper and Sawers are Governors of The Ditchley Foundation, which looks like a nest of New World Order vipers; Lord Carrington, Lord Kerr, a number of Bilderbergers, some suspects in the Iraq dodgy dossier saga, bankers from Goldman Sachs and Warburg, etc.
IRELAND ACCEPTS AN OFFER IT CAN'T REFUSE
To save the Rothschild Inter Alpha group Ireland has been first encouraged, then warned, and finally after days of refusing to cooperate, the IMF was sent in and made Ireland an offer it can't refuse.
This is the shape of things to come for Europe.
For decades we have sat idly by as the IMF destroyed Africa and parts of Asia.
But now after using derivatives and forming the Eurozone, Europe is to worship at the altar of the IMF, beholden to its demands.
I recall James Paul Warburg stating to the US Senate,
We are still at the consent stage, I think, but just about.
If they decide they cannot get consent and go for conquest instead then the Albert Pike third world war scenario will be restarted with a blatant attack on Iran, either directly on Iran or via Lebanon.
The Albert Pike three world war theory is just one plan, Plan B, but because we have had to suffer two world wars before now and they still do not have an overt world government, even now in 2010, then I think that this proves that at each stage they have tried to implement a world government a world war was required, ie conquest.
So they try consent, then if they can't get consent they start a world war and try conquest. But they don't start a world war without guaranteeing that they will be on the winning side. Hence they built up Germany but in both previous world wars they surrounded Germany with USA and Russia so that Germany didn't stand a chance. They then tried consent with the League of Nations and the United Nations. The League failed. The UN survived and has some authority, but as Brzezinski stated in that video of him admitting that they are in big trouble, the UN is not yet the world government that they want and need.
So they are still trying consent, for now, but if they don't get it then expect an attack on Iran.
I am.
===============================
From http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1330417/George-Osborne-ready-bail-devt-ridden-Ireland-OUR-billions.html
Debt-ridden Ireland will get an IMF loan worth tens of billions, Central Bank chief confirms
By Hugo Duncan and Tim Shipman
Last updated at 9:39 AM on 18th November 2010
The Governor of Ireland's Central Bank today said he expects the country to get a loan worth tens of billions through an International Monetary Fund-European Union rescue package.
But Professor Patrick Honohan said he believes influential IMF-EU experts will not demand any radical alteration of the Government's savings plans once they inspect Exchequer and bank books.
'It's not my call. It's the Government at the end. It's my expectation that that is what is likely to happen,' he told Irish state broadcaster RTE Radio.
Prof Honohan spoke after it was revealed that British taxpayers may have to stump up billions of pounds to help save the debt-laden country from collapse.
© Associated Newspapers Ltd
This is the shape of things to come for Europe.
For decades we have sat idly by as the IMF destroyed Africa and parts of Asia.
But now after using derivatives and forming the Eurozone, Europe is to worship at the altar of the IMF, beholden to its demands.
I recall James Paul Warburg stating to the US Senate,
"We shall have world government, whether or not we like it. The question is only whether world government will be achieved by consent or by conquest."
We are still at the consent stage, I think, but just about.
If they decide they cannot get consent and go for conquest instead then the Albert Pike third world war scenario will be restarted with a blatant attack on Iran, either directly on Iran or via Lebanon.
The Albert Pike three world war theory is just one plan, Plan B, but because we have had to suffer two world wars before now and they still do not have an overt world government, even now in 2010, then I think that this proves that at each stage they have tried to implement a world government a world war was required, ie conquest.
So they try consent, then if they can't get consent they start a world war and try conquest. But they don't start a world war without guaranteeing that they will be on the winning side. Hence they built up Germany but in both previous world wars they surrounded Germany with USA and Russia so that Germany didn't stand a chance. They then tried consent with the League of Nations and the United Nations. The League failed. The UN survived and has some authority, but as Brzezinski stated in that video of him admitting that they are in big trouble, the UN is not yet the world government that they want and need.
So they are still trying consent, for now, but if they don't get it then expect an attack on Iran.
I am.
===============================
From http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1330417/George-Osborne-ready-bail-devt-ridden-Ireland-OUR-billions.html
Debt-ridden Ireland will get an IMF loan worth tens of billions, Central Bank chief confirms
By Hugo Duncan and Tim Shipman
Last updated at 9:39 AM on 18th November 2010
The Governor of Ireland's Central Bank today said he expects the country to get a loan worth tens of billions through an International Monetary Fund-European Union rescue package.
But Professor Patrick Honohan said he believes influential IMF-EU experts will not demand any radical alteration of the Government's savings plans once they inspect Exchequer and bank books.
'It's not my call. It's the Government at the end. It's my expectation that that is what is likely to happen,' he told Irish state broadcaster RTE Radio.
Prof Honohan spoke after it was revealed that British taxpayers may have to stump up billions of pounds to help save the debt-laden country from collapse.
© Associated Newspapers Ltd
BBC NOT TO SHOW DOCUMENTARY IMPLICATING HEZBOLLAH IN HARIRI ASSASSINATION
The BBC has decided to not show a documentary that it commissioned from a London-based Saudi production company called ORTV. The documentary called Murder in Beirut alleges that Hezbollah killed Rafik Hariri.
I would be wary of ORTV.
First, Saudi Arabia is a creation of British and American manipulation. The Sauds were armed by the British to stab the Arabs in the back after the Arabs had rebelled against the Ottomans. In return, to control the Arabs on behalf of the Anglo-American Establishment, the Sauds were given the land we now call Saudi Arabia and all its oil. The Sauds follow Wahhabism, and it is Wahhabism that created Islamic Fundamentalist Terrorism, that was allowed to be based in London through the Covenant of Security with MI5. The circle was thus complete.
But a few of ORTV documentaries hint at the allegiance that ORTV ultimately has.
One is entitled The Atomic Republic of Iran. I cannot find one produced by ORTV called The Atomic Apartheid State of Israel.
Another documentary is entitled Iran's Rebel Voices, which sympathises with the Green Revolution that tried unsuccessfuly to overthrow the Iranian government last year, and is yet another colour revolution of MI6/CIA/Mossad.
Yet another is Saudi Arabia Goes Global, which appears to be a glorifying pro-Saudi documentary.
Yet another is King Abdullah, which praises King Abdullah and shows fawning interviews of George "Warmonger Waterboarder" Bush and Tony "the Butcher of Baghdad" Blair.
Yet another is King Fahd, similar to King Abdullah.
And yet another is Inside Saddam's Iraq, which allegedly takes a closer look at Saddam Hussein and his reign over Iraq. Does it mention his CIA links, how he was armed and helped by the USA and UK during the Iran-Iraq War, and how his behaviour served the Anglo-American-Israeli Establishment so well?
A London-based pro-Saudi production company makes a documentary implicating Hezbollah in the assassination of Rafik Hariri? Would you Adam 'n Eve it?
==================================
From http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010/nov/17/bbc-lebanon-film-rafik-hariri
BBC series on Rafiq al-Hariri pulled as tension rises in Lebanon
• Programmes examine assassination of former PM
• Tribunal may be about to accuse Hezbollah members
* Ian Black, Middle East editor
* guardian.co.uk, Wednesday 17 November 2010 21.56 GMT
The BBC has suddenly pulled a documentary film series about the assassination of the former Lebanese prime minister Rafiq al-Hariri as tensions mount in Beirut over expectations that Hezbollah operatives are about to be accused of involvement in the killing.
The first of three parts of Murder in Beirut was scheduled to be broadcast on BBC World this Saturday, but the producer was told without warning on Tuesday that it was being delayed.
The BBC said the film had not yet complied with its editorial guidelines. No new date has been set. But the decision to postpone it was taken after a Lebanese newspaper described how it accused the militant Shia group of the 2005 assassination, in which Hariri and 22 others were killed by a massive car bomb.
The point of the film, al-Akhbar claimed in a front-page article on Monday, was "to implicate Hezbollah in the crime", with one image showing partial details of a man described as a former member of the organisation's foreign operations unit. Today extracts were broadcast on al-Jadeed TV, a pro-Syrian channel.
Tension has mounted sharply in Lebanon in recent weeks amid expectations that a UN-backed international tribunal will shortly issue indictments in the case, the country's equivalent of the Kennedy assassination. Hezbollah's leader, Hassan Nasrallah, warned last week that he would "cut off the hand" of anyone who tried to arrest its members. Hezbollah, the most powerful military and political force in Lebanon, is supported by Iran and Syria and has repeatedly accused the tribunal of serving US and Israeli interests.
Sa'ad Hariri, the dead man's son and current prime minister, has insisted that he, Nasrallah and other leaders will not let Lebanon "explode" over the issue.
The series was made by ORTV, a British-Saudi production company, and originally commissioned by al-Arabiyya TV, the Saudi-owned satellite channel. The first version was completed last summer but never broadcast as Saudi Arabia sought to improve relations with Syria. BBC World then commissioned a re-edited version.
Initially Syria was widely blamed for the killing but it has become clear in recent months that Hezbollah is suspected of involvement, fuelling fears that Lebanon's rivalries will escalate dangerously if indictments are issued.
The tribunal, based in a suburb of The Hague, began work in March 2009. In a new twist, Lebanese media reported that Alireza Asghari, a former Iranian revolutionary guard general who defected to the US, provided information about the role of Hezbollah's Imad Mughniyeh, who was assassinated in Damascus in 2008.
The films include interviews with decision-makers in Beirut, Damascus, Washington and Paris, promising to tell "the gripping inside story of what's really at stake in the struggle for power in the Middle East". The BBC has not been warned specifically not to screen the series, but insiders admit there is nervousness about its impact in the current volatile climate.
Nadim Shehadi, a Lebanon expert at the Chatham House thinktank in London, said: "There is an atmosphere of terror in Beirut. It may be a deliberate campaign to apply pressure to the tribunal. It is almost as if there is a communications strategy."
The producer, Christopher Mitchell, told the Guardian: "It is true that the film's transmission has suddenly been postponed. I am assured by the BBC that the series hasn't been dropped. Stories about the Middle East are … highly sensitive and go through a lengthy period of fact-checking and approval. I hope it will appear in the near future. Was this justified? I don't yet know, though I understand the sensitivities involved. Murder in Beirut tackles a difficult subject and everybody on the production worked hard to make sure it was as fair and accurate as possible. Naturally we are very disappointed that the broadcast has been delayed."
A BBC spokesman said: "All programmes shown by BBC World News must comply with the BBC's editorial guidelines. This applies equally to programmes we commission from the BBC, independents or, in this case, bought-in programmes. From time to time, the compliance process requires more time to complete. This can affect scheduling. This series of programmes falls into this category."
Rafiq Hariri was a billionaire businessman who served twice as Lebanese prime minister and helped rebuild central Beirut after the ravages of the civil war. A Sunni Muslim who was backed by Saudi Arabia, and a close friend of France's Jacques Chirac, he fell victim to divisions about Syrian influence in Lebanon. But his murder on 14 February 2005 triggered mass protests and international pressure that led to the removal of Syrian forces after nearly 30 years. Syria's president, Bashar al-Assad, has always denied any involvement and the focus recently has been on the possible involvement in the killing of Hezbollah, part of Lebanon's parliamentary opposition as well as a powerful militia which is credited with leading resistance to Israel since the 1982 invasion. General Gabi Ashkenazi, the Israeli army chief of staff, said this week that if the tribunal were to indict Hezbollah members it would probably lead to a coup d'état.
guardian.co.uk © Guardian News and Media Limited 2010
I would be wary of ORTV.
First, Saudi Arabia is a creation of British and American manipulation. The Sauds were armed by the British to stab the Arabs in the back after the Arabs had rebelled against the Ottomans. In return, to control the Arabs on behalf of the Anglo-American Establishment, the Sauds were given the land we now call Saudi Arabia and all its oil. The Sauds follow Wahhabism, and it is Wahhabism that created Islamic Fundamentalist Terrorism, that was allowed to be based in London through the Covenant of Security with MI5. The circle was thus complete.
But a few of ORTV documentaries hint at the allegiance that ORTV ultimately has.
One is entitled The Atomic Republic of Iran. I cannot find one produced by ORTV called The Atomic Apartheid State of Israel.
Another documentary is entitled Iran's Rebel Voices, which sympathises with the Green Revolution that tried unsuccessfuly to overthrow the Iranian government last year, and is yet another colour revolution of MI6/CIA/Mossad.
Yet another is Saudi Arabia Goes Global, which appears to be a glorifying pro-Saudi documentary.
Yet another is King Abdullah, which praises King Abdullah and shows fawning interviews of George "Warmonger Waterboarder" Bush and Tony "the Butcher of Baghdad" Blair.
Yet another is King Fahd, similar to King Abdullah.
And yet another is Inside Saddam's Iraq, which allegedly takes a closer look at Saddam Hussein and his reign over Iraq. Does it mention his CIA links, how he was armed and helped by the USA and UK during the Iran-Iraq War, and how his behaviour served the Anglo-American-Israeli Establishment so well?
A London-based pro-Saudi production company makes a documentary implicating Hezbollah in the assassination of Rafik Hariri? Would you Adam 'n Eve it?
==================================
From http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010/nov/17/bbc-lebanon-film-rafik-hariri
BBC series on Rafiq al-Hariri pulled as tension rises in Lebanon
• Programmes examine assassination of former PM
• Tribunal may be about to accuse Hezbollah members
* Ian Black, Middle East editor
* guardian.co.uk, Wednesday 17 November 2010 21.56 GMT
The BBC has suddenly pulled a documentary film series about the assassination of the former Lebanese prime minister Rafiq al-Hariri as tensions mount in Beirut over expectations that Hezbollah operatives are about to be accused of involvement in the killing.
The first of three parts of Murder in Beirut was scheduled to be broadcast on BBC World this Saturday, but the producer was told without warning on Tuesday that it was being delayed.
The BBC said the film had not yet complied with its editorial guidelines. No new date has been set. But the decision to postpone it was taken after a Lebanese newspaper described how it accused the militant Shia group of the 2005 assassination, in which Hariri and 22 others were killed by a massive car bomb.
The point of the film, al-Akhbar claimed in a front-page article on Monday, was "to implicate Hezbollah in the crime", with one image showing partial details of a man described as a former member of the organisation's foreign operations unit. Today extracts were broadcast on al-Jadeed TV, a pro-Syrian channel.
Tension has mounted sharply in Lebanon in recent weeks amid expectations that a UN-backed international tribunal will shortly issue indictments in the case, the country's equivalent of the Kennedy assassination. Hezbollah's leader, Hassan Nasrallah, warned last week that he would "cut off the hand" of anyone who tried to arrest its members. Hezbollah, the most powerful military and political force in Lebanon, is supported by Iran and Syria and has repeatedly accused the tribunal of serving US and Israeli interests.
Sa'ad Hariri, the dead man's son and current prime minister, has insisted that he, Nasrallah and other leaders will not let Lebanon "explode" over the issue.
The series was made by ORTV, a British-Saudi production company, and originally commissioned by al-Arabiyya TV, the Saudi-owned satellite channel. The first version was completed last summer but never broadcast as Saudi Arabia sought to improve relations with Syria. BBC World then commissioned a re-edited version.
Initially Syria was widely blamed for the killing but it has become clear in recent months that Hezbollah is suspected of involvement, fuelling fears that Lebanon's rivalries will escalate dangerously if indictments are issued.
The tribunal, based in a suburb of The Hague, began work in March 2009. In a new twist, Lebanese media reported that Alireza Asghari, a former Iranian revolutionary guard general who defected to the US, provided information about the role of Hezbollah's Imad Mughniyeh, who was assassinated in Damascus in 2008.
The films include interviews with decision-makers in Beirut, Damascus, Washington and Paris, promising to tell "the gripping inside story of what's really at stake in the struggle for power in the Middle East". The BBC has not been warned specifically not to screen the series, but insiders admit there is nervousness about its impact in the current volatile climate.
Nadim Shehadi, a Lebanon expert at the Chatham House thinktank in London, said: "There is an atmosphere of terror in Beirut. It may be a deliberate campaign to apply pressure to the tribunal. It is almost as if there is a communications strategy."
The producer, Christopher Mitchell, told the Guardian: "It is true that the film's transmission has suddenly been postponed. I am assured by the BBC that the series hasn't been dropped. Stories about the Middle East are … highly sensitive and go through a lengthy period of fact-checking and approval. I hope it will appear in the near future. Was this justified? I don't yet know, though I understand the sensitivities involved. Murder in Beirut tackles a difficult subject and everybody on the production worked hard to make sure it was as fair and accurate as possible. Naturally we are very disappointed that the broadcast has been delayed."
A BBC spokesman said: "All programmes shown by BBC World News must comply with the BBC's editorial guidelines. This applies equally to programmes we commission from the BBC, independents or, in this case, bought-in programmes. From time to time, the compliance process requires more time to complete. This can affect scheduling. This series of programmes falls into this category."
Rafiq Hariri was a billionaire businessman who served twice as Lebanese prime minister and helped rebuild central Beirut after the ravages of the civil war. A Sunni Muslim who was backed by Saudi Arabia, and a close friend of France's Jacques Chirac, he fell victim to divisions about Syrian influence in Lebanon. But his murder on 14 February 2005 triggered mass protests and international pressure that led to the removal of Syrian forces after nearly 30 years. Syria's president, Bashar al-Assad, has always denied any involvement and the focus recently has been on the possible involvement in the killing of Hezbollah, part of Lebanon's parliamentary opposition as well as a powerful militia which is credited with leading resistance to Israel since the 1982 invasion. General Gabi Ashkenazi, the Israeli army chief of staff, said this week that if the tribunal were to indict Hezbollah members it would probably lead to a coup d'état.
guardian.co.uk © Guardian News and Media Limited 2010
Wednesday, November 17, 2010
UK GIVES HARIRI INVESTIGATION ONE MILLION POUNDS
Now that the Lebanon has recognised that it is being manipulated over the assassination of Rafik Hariri, having been encouraged to blame Syria and drive Syria out of Lebanon as per the A Clean Break agenda, the UK government is now giving £1 million to the tribunal that initially and incorrectly accused Syria and some Lebanese military of the assassination.
This comes at a time when Bilderberg supremo Ken Clarke, the current 'Justice' Minister, is to slash Legal Aid in the UK.
So we give £1 million to a proven corrupt 'investigation' that has a semi-secret agenda, but at the same time slash Legal Aid to British citizens who may well suffer miscarriages of justice as a result?
Hmm. Just one more factoid in Bizarro World!
===================================
From http://presstv.ir/detail/151386.html
Britain to fuel controversy in Lebanon
Wed Nov 17, 2010 1:5PM
Britain has announced a controversial move to contribute £1 million to the US-sponsored special tribunal probing the 2005 assassination of former Lebanese
British Foreign Secretary William Hague said London will provide the funding in 2011 to support the US-backed tribunal claiming it aims to find justice for a political assassination.
"It is important that international justice be done and that we hold those guilty of serious crimes to account," Hague said in a statement.
Hague insisted contributing to the court, which has already received a £18.88 million ($30 million) funding from the US, is “the only way to ensure long term stability” in the Middle Eastern country.
He also called on the international community to continue to provide financial support to the probe.
The new commitment increases London's total contribution to £2.3 million.
This comes as analysts believe backing the tribunal, which was set up in 2007 to investigate political assassinations including that of Hariri in 2005, is aimed at triggering hostilities between political groups in Lebanon.
The contributions to the US-sponsored proceedings also come amid increasing anger and suspicion in Lebanon about the tribunal's work.
Visiting chairman of the US Senate Foreign Relations Committee, John Kerry, went as far as claiming on Monday that Lebanon's Prime Minister Saad Hariri is powerless to change the course of the investigations.
"Prime Minister Hariri doesn't have the power to change the tribunal," Kerry said. "Lebanon doesn't have the power to change the tribunal”.
The tribunal is supposed to be 51% funded by international donors while getting 49% of its financing from Lebanon's government, but Lebanon's contribution is currently blocked in parliament.
AMR/HE
© Copyright 2010 Press TV. All rights reserved.
This comes at a time when Bilderberg supremo Ken Clarke, the current 'Justice' Minister, is to slash Legal Aid in the UK.
So we give £1 million to a proven corrupt 'investigation' that has a semi-secret agenda, but at the same time slash Legal Aid to British citizens who may well suffer miscarriages of justice as a result?
Hmm. Just one more factoid in Bizarro World!
===================================
From http://presstv.ir/detail/151386.html
Britain to fuel controversy in Lebanon
Wed Nov 17, 2010 1:5PM
Britain has announced a controversial move to contribute £1 million to the US-sponsored special tribunal probing the 2005 assassination of former Lebanese
British Foreign Secretary William Hague said London will provide the funding in 2011 to support the US-backed tribunal claiming it aims to find justice for a political assassination.
"It is important that international justice be done and that we hold those guilty of serious crimes to account," Hague said in a statement.
Hague insisted contributing to the court, which has already received a £18.88 million ($30 million) funding from the US, is “the only way to ensure long term stability” in the Middle Eastern country.
He also called on the international community to continue to provide financial support to the probe.
The new commitment increases London's total contribution to £2.3 million.
This comes as analysts believe backing the tribunal, which was set up in 2007 to investigate political assassinations including that of Hariri in 2005, is aimed at triggering hostilities between political groups in Lebanon.
The contributions to the US-sponsored proceedings also come amid increasing anger and suspicion in Lebanon about the tribunal's work.
Visiting chairman of the US Senate Foreign Relations Committee, John Kerry, went as far as claiming on Monday that Lebanon's Prime Minister Saad Hariri is powerless to change the course of the investigations.
"Prime Minister Hariri doesn't have the power to change the tribunal," Kerry said. "Lebanon doesn't have the power to change the tribunal”.
The tribunal is supposed to be 51% funded by international donors while getting 49% of its financing from Lebanon's government, but Lebanon's contribution is currently blocked in parliament.
AMR/HE
© Copyright 2010 Press TV. All rights reserved.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)