Shortly after 7/7 I wrote to the ISC prophesising an Israeli invasion of Gaza. Settlers were being pulled out of the area amidst great protest from them. Why would the Isreali govt do such a thing to its own people? I suggested to the ISC that 7/7 was allowed to happen to drum up support for such an invasion, or at least create sympathy for such an invasion.
On 11th September 2001 during a live interview after the false-flag terror attacks of that day, Benjamin Netanyahu said that 9/11 was good for Israel and would create sympathy for Israel. I believe our 9/11, 7/7, was designed to provoke similar emotions.
Gradually the noose has been tightening around Gaza. Power cuts. Bulldozing of walls by occupants of Gaza to get into Egypt to buy essential supplies following Israeli blockades.
And now this report from EIR suggests that Israel is finally preparing to invade Gaza.
If it does I predict hell. For this is what Israel was created for. Naked aggression against starving, weak, unprotected Palestinian civilians to provoke anger and outrage, and ultimately war, And with Netanyahu, Lieberman and Barak in control that war will turn nuclear. And when it does everyone will be involved, thus turning a regional war into a full scale nuclear world war.
Just as requested by Albert Pike.
I ask Russian President Vladimir Putin not to wait for follow-up meetings from Annapolis, but to get in there NOW and arrange an extraordinary emergency meeting of all states who attended Annapolis, plus Iran. It is clear the neighbouring states of Israel have no trust in America. It is also clear it is America driving the rush to war.
======================================
From http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2008/3504lar_gaza_war_insane.html
This article appears in the January 25, 2008 issue of Executive Intelligence Review.
LaRouche: Israeli War Plans
Against Gaza Are Insane
by Jeffrey Steinberg
On Jan. 17, Lyndon LaRouche warned Israeli leaders that if they go forward with their reported plans to conduct large-scale military operations inside the Gaza Strip, they will be unleashing chaos throughout the region, and sabotaging any hopes of a regional peace breakthrough. "It would be insane, suicidally insane," LaRouche commented. "Israel's own self-destruction would be virtually assured."
LaRouche issued the warning after EIR had received detailed reports from Israeli and U.S. intelligence sources, that a recent meeting of the Israeli security cabinet, following President George Bush's recent eight-day visit to the region, had approved massive military operations into Gaza, to uproot Hamas command and control, and to assassinate or arrest leading Hamas figures—all in the name of "peace." Indeed, even before Bush completed his regional tour, Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) units launched a series of targeted military operations in Gaza against Hamas, killing dozens of people, including the son of a prominent Hamas leader. The Israeli actions followed on the heels of the U.S. President's visit to Ramallah, on the West Bank, where he held a meeting and media availability with Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas. This led the PA leader to threaten to resign on Jan. 18, unless the Israeli military operations were immediately halted. Abbas is reportedly furious at the Americans and the Israelis for what appears to to him to have been a setup, giving the impression that he had somehow signed off on the assaults into Gaza.
Barak's Blind Ambitions
According to both the Israeli and American sources, Labor Party leader and Minister of Defense Ehud Barak has been a proponent of the Gaza strikes, arguing that no two-state solution to the Israel-Palestine conflict is possible, so long as Hamas remains a strong and popular force among Palestinians, and retains control over Gaza. It is an open secret in Israel that Barak is convinced that military victories in the Gaza campaign can catapult him back into the prime ministership.
According to one well-placed Israeli source, the Olmert cabinet has approved a large-scale military invasion, to occur anytime after April. This, however, is premised on the survival of the Olmert government, which is awaiting the release of the Winograd Commission report on Jan. 30, 2008. The Commission has conducted a thorough review of the disastrous July 2006 Israeli invasion of Lebanon, which aimed to crush Hezbollah. After a month of air strikes and ground operations, Israel halted the invasion, having failed to seriously damage Hezbollah's forces in southern Lebanon.
It was a nightmare defeat for Israel. The Chief of Staff of the Israeli Defense Forces, Air Force Gen. Dan Haloutz, was forced to resign, and the new Israeli military leadership overhauled their Northern Front war plans, to take into account Hezbollah's surprisingly effective asymmetric warfare operations. Any new Israeli military operation against Hezbollah would, according to American and Israeli sources, involve massive air and ground conventional attacks by the IDF, and would likely precipitate a war with Syria, and perhaps, even Iran.
If the Winograd report focuses the blame on Prime Minister Olmert, there could be further cabinet resignations, forcing early elections. In that case, Likud leader and former Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is waiting in the wings. He has been an open advocate of Israeli preventive strikes against Iran's purported nuclear weapons sites. Recent polls suggest that Netanyahu would win a snap election for prime minister. A close ally of U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney and others in the pro-British war party in Washington, Netanyahu would also likely launch a full-scale invasion of Gaza, but, unlike misguided Labor Party leaders, who believe that peace with the Palestinians can be achieved over the political corpse of Hamas, Netanyahu would see the smashing of Gaza as a guarantee that peace would be off the table for the indefinite future.
Wednesday, January 23, 2008
Friday, January 18, 2008
BRITISH GAS PRICES UP 15%. TEACHERS GET 2.45%
Real inflation is allegedly at 4.5% (but it's much higher than that).
'nuff sed.
Except to the coppers, remember 1984. You battered those miners in dark alleyways. They knew we had 200 years of fuel independence with top quality coal, and they got battered.
And what do you get now? Your own financial kick in the teeth. Just like the rest of us.
First they came for the miners, but I wasn't a miner so I didn't speak up.
Then they came for the teachers, but I wasn't a teacher so I didn't speak up.
Then they came for us coppers, but by then there was noone left to speak up for me, because everyone was so bloody demoralised by our fanatical bullying and harrassment.
'nuff sed.
Except to the coppers, remember 1984. You battered those miners in dark alleyways. They knew we had 200 years of fuel independence with top quality coal, and they got battered.
And what do you get now? Your own financial kick in the teeth. Just like the rest of us.
First they came for the miners, but I wasn't a miner so I didn't speak up.
Then they came for the teachers, but I wasn't a teacher so I didn't speak up.
Then they came for us coppers, but by then there was noone left to speak up for me, because everyone was so bloody demoralised by our fanatical bullying and harrassment.
BANKS : "WE DON'T HAVE TO BE FAIR"
The banks are in the dock over bank charges.
The OFT is arguing that ridiculous charges for overdrafts are not set out clearly under current unfair contract terms. The banks argue they are, and anyway, they don't have to be fair.
I have personal experience of this when I was charged the equivalent of 50% for an overdraft. I understand there are people who have experienced much more outrageous charges for going just a few pence or pounds overdrawn and charged £30 or more.
The banks argue that they don't have to be fair.
This is the classic attitude of the banks, and supports the thesis that I and many others have claimed; that the banks have totally abused the power they have to create money out of nothing, pass it off as if the Bank of England had created it (because we use BofE notes, not NatWest, HSBC notes etc), and then use that money they created out of nothing to finance world wars and bloody revolutions which kill tens if not hundreds of millions of civilians.
In a word, this argument shows the attitude of the banks; arrogance.
They argue that they don't have to be fair to us to protect a nice little £3.5 billion earner.
They use our money!! The cheeky bastards.
We are slowly being forced into depending on them due to the slow introduction of the cashless society in preparation for the microchip implant. Our wages etc go straight into bank accounts and are not paid in cash. And because of that they have more control over our money than ever! And now they argue they don't have to be fair!
I read that some of the traitors to the human race protecting the banks in this case are charging £1000 per hour, and have already clocked up £1m each in fees!
This court case will show the banks for what they are;
they create money out of nothing, and can turn this shithole world into heaven very easily, but instead they finance world wars, genocidal dictators and bloody revolutions to give them more power, and then argue they don't have to be fair to us, the people who unwittingly give them the power to create money out of nothing in the first place.
This may also go some way in increasing the call for the power to create money out of nothing be stripped from the banks and given back to us, the people, so we can decide who is given money.
I am convinced that if, in the first half of the 20th Century, the Federal Reserve and the Bank of England were not privately owned but were in the hands of officials elected into office or appointed by elected officials, and given responsibility for stabilising the economy and regulating the currency then neither Communism nor Fascism would have existed and World War 2 would have been avoided.
The banks, with this power to create money out of nothing, have never been fair to us. And the way in which the banks are defending their outrageous overdraft charges is classic; "we don't have to be fair".
============================
from http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=508881&in_page_id=1770
Banks argue that there's no reason for them to be fair, as court battle on overdraft fees begins
By BECKY BARROW and JAMES CONEY - More by this author » Last updated at 00:46am on 18th January 2008
The banks contend that they do not have to take fairness into account when calculating overdraft fees
High Street banks claimed yesterday that overdraft charges which rake in billions of pounds a year are not subject to normal 'fairness' rules.
In the first day of a long-awaited legal battle, the banks insisted they have the right to charge the fees that can be as high as £38 even if a customer has slipped only a few pence into the red.
Campaigners claim the actual cost to the bank is as little as £2.50.
Experts estimate that banks make about £3.5billion a year from unauthorised overdraft fees.
The OFT is arguing that ridiculous charges for overdrafts are not set out clearly under current unfair contract terms. The banks argue they are, and anyway, they don't have to be fair.
I have personal experience of this when I was charged the equivalent of 50% for an overdraft. I understand there are people who have experienced much more outrageous charges for going just a few pence or pounds overdrawn and charged £30 or more.
The banks argue that they don't have to be fair.
This is the classic attitude of the banks, and supports the thesis that I and many others have claimed; that the banks have totally abused the power they have to create money out of nothing, pass it off as if the Bank of England had created it (because we use BofE notes, not NatWest, HSBC notes etc), and then use that money they created out of nothing to finance world wars and bloody revolutions which kill tens if not hundreds of millions of civilians.
In a word, this argument shows the attitude of the banks; arrogance.
They argue that they don't have to be fair to us to protect a nice little £3.5 billion earner.
They use our money!! The cheeky bastards.
We are slowly being forced into depending on them due to the slow introduction of the cashless society in preparation for the microchip implant. Our wages etc go straight into bank accounts and are not paid in cash. And because of that they have more control over our money than ever! And now they argue they don't have to be fair!
I read that some of the traitors to the human race protecting the banks in this case are charging £1000 per hour, and have already clocked up £1m each in fees!
This court case will show the banks for what they are;
they create money out of nothing, and can turn this shithole world into heaven very easily, but instead they finance world wars, genocidal dictators and bloody revolutions to give them more power, and then argue they don't have to be fair to us, the people who unwittingly give them the power to create money out of nothing in the first place.
This may also go some way in increasing the call for the power to create money out of nothing be stripped from the banks and given back to us, the people, so we can decide who is given money.
I am convinced that if, in the first half of the 20th Century, the Federal Reserve and the Bank of England were not privately owned but were in the hands of officials elected into office or appointed by elected officials, and given responsibility for stabilising the economy and regulating the currency then neither Communism nor Fascism would have existed and World War 2 would have been avoided.
The banks, with this power to create money out of nothing, have never been fair to us. And the way in which the banks are defending their outrageous overdraft charges is classic; "we don't have to be fair".
============================
from http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=508881&in_page_id=1770
Banks argue that there's no reason for them to be fair, as court battle on overdraft fees begins
By BECKY BARROW and JAMES CONEY - More by this author » Last updated at 00:46am on 18th January 2008
The banks contend that they do not have to take fairness into account when calculating overdraft fees
High Street banks claimed yesterday that overdraft charges which rake in billions of pounds a year are not subject to normal 'fairness' rules.
In the first day of a long-awaited legal battle, the banks insisted they have the right to charge the fees that can be as high as £38 even if a customer has slipped only a few pence into the red.
Campaigners claim the actual cost to the bank is as little as £2.50.
Experts estimate that banks make about £3.5billion a year from unauthorised overdraft fees.
Wednesday, January 16, 2008
SHOULD THE QUEEN TAKE THE STAND IN THE DIANA INQUEST?
There is much chatter in the papers today about the Mishcon Note, in which he records Diana claiming she was to be got rid of in a car crash, and the Queen would abdicate. Mishcon was concerned enough to ask for Diana's security to be increased.
The papers, and commentators, attempt to laugh such claims off because the Queen did not abdicate.
But who has asked her? Was she going to abdicate, but changed her mind? If so, what changed her mind?
If she had decided to abdicate but changed her mind this would shine a completely different light on the Mishcon Note.
Another question that could be asked of The Queen, should she take to the stand, would be, who are those 'dark forces' you mentioned to Paul Burrell?
But one thing that cannot be denied; it does not look good when Diana predicts the exact manner of her death, and high ranking police officers withhold evidence that indicates she knew how she was going to die.
The papers, and commentators, attempt to laugh such claims off because the Queen did not abdicate.
But who has asked her? Was she going to abdicate, but changed her mind? If so, what changed her mind?
If she had decided to abdicate but changed her mind this would shine a completely different light on the Mishcon Note.
Another question that could be asked of The Queen, should she take to the stand, would be, who are those 'dark forces' you mentioned to Paul Burrell?
But one thing that cannot be denied; it does not look good when Diana predicts the exact manner of her death, and high ranking police officers withhold evidence that indicates she knew how she was going to die.
Tuesday, January 15, 2008
BLAIR IS FIVE TIMES THE TRAITOR TO THE HUMAN RACE
Reports are now saying that Blair will get not £0.5million, but FIVE TIMES THAT, £2.5million, for his advisory role to JP Morgan Chase.
Meanwhile, Iraq's oil is still lined up to be handed to the Anglo-Americans despite Blair telling us it would go to the Iraqis, NATO is still trying to capture the Caspian, and the Middle East needs a set of full-time, fully-funded bona fide peace negotiators (not Kissinger Associates) to sort out the NWO-manufactured warmongering there.
Ain't it funny how there's always money for war and advisors, and not for charity and peace negotiators?
=========================
From http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=508157&in_page_id=1770
Tony Blair will be paid £2.5m a year for his post at US investment bank JP Morgan, it was revealed today.
It is the first of a series of posts that could see the former prime minister rake in a staggering £40million.
He is expected to advise JP Morgan on the political and economic changes brought about by globalisation, according to the BBC.
Since leaving Number 10, Mr Blair has been an unpaid envoy to the Middle East and an after-dinner speaker.
Meanwhile, Iraq's oil is still lined up to be handed to the Anglo-Americans despite Blair telling us it would go to the Iraqis, NATO is still trying to capture the Caspian, and the Middle East needs a set of full-time, fully-funded bona fide peace negotiators (not Kissinger Associates) to sort out the NWO-manufactured warmongering there.
Ain't it funny how there's always money for war and advisors, and not for charity and peace negotiators?
=========================
From http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=508157&in_page_id=1770
Tony Blair will be paid £2.5m a year for his post at US investment bank JP Morgan, it was revealed today.
It is the first of a series of posts that could see the former prime minister rake in a staggering £40million.
He is expected to advise JP Morgan on the political and economic changes brought about by globalisation, according to the BBC.
Since leaving Number 10, Mr Blair has been an unpaid envoy to the Middle East and an after-dinner speaker.
Monday, January 14, 2008
INVERTED STARS AND STRIPES CONFIRMED
A search on Flickr with "clinton new hampshire manchester" returns some photos by WBUR. They confirm the inverted stars and stripes at Clinton's Manchester rally.
The history of this paticular flag needs to be researched.
Who chose it?
Who manufactured it?
The history of this paticular flag needs to be researched.
Who chose it?
Who manufactured it?
CURIOUS PHOTOS OF HILLARY CLINTON'S FINAL RALLY IN NEW HAMPSHIRE
Hillary Clinton's website has a series of photos taken from her final rally before the New Hampshire Primary.
http://www.hillaryclinton.com/hq/newhampshire/
Scroll to the bottom of the page.
The Stars and Stripes behind the stage has the stars the correct (good) way; two points down, one point up.
But the Stars and Stripes on the wall are the incorrect (bad) way; two points up, one point down.
I have had a quick look on Flickr to confirm this but have so far not found a photo of that Stars and Stripes on the wall.
ps the slideshow on Clinton's website indicates it was Hillary herself who uploaded the photos!
http://www.hillaryclinton.com/hq/newhampshire/
Scroll to the bottom of the page.
The Stars and Stripes behind the stage has the stars the correct (good) way; two points down, one point up.
But the Stars and Stripes on the wall are the incorrect (bad) way; two points up, one point down.
I have had a quick look on Flickr to confirm this but have so far not found a photo of that Stars and Stripes on the wall.
ps the slideshow on Clinton's website indicates it was Hillary herself who uploaded the photos!
Sunday, January 13, 2008
LARGE INCREASE IN MURDERS DUE TO WAR VETERANS
A study into crimes resulting in violence and murder in the USA has revealed a shocking but not unexpected finding; the large increase in such crimes in the last six years is due to veterans returning from the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
=================
From http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080113/ap_on_re_us/killings_after_combat
NEW YORK - At least 121 Iraq and Afghanistan war veterans have committed a killing or been charged in one in the United States after returning from combat, The New York Times reported Sunday.
The newspaper said it also logged 349 homicides involving all active-duty military personnel and new veterans in the six years since military action began in Afghanistan, and later Iraq. That represents an 89-percent increase over the previous six-year period, the newspaper said.
About three-quarters of those homicides involved Iraq and Afghanistan war veterans, the newspaper said. The report did not illuminate the exact relationship between those cases and the 121 killings also mentioned in the report.
=================
From http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080113/ap_on_re_us/killings_after_combat
NEW YORK - At least 121 Iraq and Afghanistan war veterans have committed a killing or been charged in one in the United States after returning from combat, The New York Times reported Sunday.
The newspaper said it also logged 349 homicides involving all active-duty military personnel and new veterans in the six years since military action began in Afghanistan, and later Iraq. That represents an 89-percent increase over the previous six-year period, the newspaper said.
About three-quarters of those homicides involved Iraq and Afghanistan war veterans, the newspaper said. The report did not illuminate the exact relationship between those cases and the 121 killings also mentioned in the report.
PRISONERS TO BE CHIPPED LIKE DOGS
I have predicted this for years now.
The shortage of cells in prisons that we have in the UK does not just happen overnight. It takes years. For such a situation to have arisen implies to me a deliberate policy.
Why?
Because the ultimate aim of the social engineering we are going through is a microchipped human population.
To condition us to such an idea we were encouraged to 'chip our pets after a highly publicised series of pet nappings.
When the two young girls from Soham disappeared, what was suggested?
When Madeleine McCann disappeared, what was suggested?
And now the engineered surplus prison population has led to the goverment considering 'chipping prisoners.
They can't 'chip everyone immediately. They have to condition us to the idea that certain sections of society need 'chipping, for their own protection (alzheimers) or to protect us from them (violent criminals who rape 90 year old grannies). So to scare us into 'chipping the kids, paedophiles are released early or are not imprisoned at all. Criminals are another section of society that the general population wants protection from. So 'chip them too? How can this situation be made acceptable to us? Engineer a shortage of places in prison?
You're damn right!
The idea of 'chipping humans is against our concept of freedom.
To create a generation of violent, lawless criminals to sentence and then 'chip, we have been buying our children, our brothers and sisters violent computer games and films! We have been creating and financing the situation we are in ourselves!
These people tricking us into this are clever. But they are also very mentally sick. They create false terror. They engineer wars. They can change the status of the whole of humanity over night, because they have the power to create virtually unlimited quantities of money, but they don't. No, they don't care about us. This false concern for our safety is absolute bollocks, and I don't believe it.
Instead they want the human population drastically reduced in size, so they are busy engineering WW3 so we do the job for them and kill each other, and those who are allowed to live afterwards are microchipped for total surveillance.
===================================
From http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/politics/article3333852.ece
Prisoners 'to be chipped like dogs'
Hi-tech 'satellite' tagging planned in order to create more space in jails
Civil rights groups and probation officers furious at 'degrading' scheme
By Brian Brady, Whitehall Editor
Published: 13 January 2008
Ministers are planning to implant "machine-readable" microchips under the skin of thousands of offenders as part of an expansion of the electronic tagging scheme that would create more space in British jails.
Amid concerns about the security of existing tagging systems and prison overcrowding, the Ministry of Justice is investigating the use of satellite and radio-wave technology to monitor criminals.
But, instead of being contained in bracelets worn around the ankle, the tiny chips would be surgically inserted under the skin of offenders in the community, to help enforce home curfews. The radio frequency identification (RFID) tags, as long as two grains of rice, are able to carry scanable personal information about individuals, including their identities, address and offending record.
The shortage of cells in prisons that we have in the UK does not just happen overnight. It takes years. For such a situation to have arisen implies to me a deliberate policy.
Why?
Because the ultimate aim of the social engineering we are going through is a microchipped human population.
To condition us to such an idea we were encouraged to 'chip our pets after a highly publicised series of pet nappings.
When the two young girls from Soham disappeared, what was suggested?
When Madeleine McCann disappeared, what was suggested?
And now the engineered surplus prison population has led to the goverment considering 'chipping prisoners.
They can't 'chip everyone immediately. They have to condition us to the idea that certain sections of society need 'chipping, for their own protection (alzheimers) or to protect us from them (violent criminals who rape 90 year old grannies). So to scare us into 'chipping the kids, paedophiles are released early or are not imprisoned at all. Criminals are another section of society that the general population wants protection from. So 'chip them too? How can this situation be made acceptable to us? Engineer a shortage of places in prison?
You're damn right!
The idea of 'chipping humans is against our concept of freedom.
To create a generation of violent, lawless criminals to sentence and then 'chip, we have been buying our children, our brothers and sisters violent computer games and films! We have been creating and financing the situation we are in ourselves!
These people tricking us into this are clever. But they are also very mentally sick. They create false terror. They engineer wars. They can change the status of the whole of humanity over night, because they have the power to create virtually unlimited quantities of money, but they don't. No, they don't care about us. This false concern for our safety is absolute bollocks, and I don't believe it.
Instead they want the human population drastically reduced in size, so they are busy engineering WW3 so we do the job for them and kill each other, and those who are allowed to live afterwards are microchipped for total surveillance.
===================================
From http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/politics/article3333852.ece
Prisoners 'to be chipped like dogs'
Hi-tech 'satellite' tagging planned in order to create more space in jails
Civil rights groups and probation officers furious at 'degrading' scheme
By Brian Brady, Whitehall Editor
Published: 13 January 2008
Ministers are planning to implant "machine-readable" microchips under the skin of thousands of offenders as part of an expansion of the electronic tagging scheme that would create more space in British jails.
Amid concerns about the security of existing tagging systems and prison overcrowding, the Ministry of Justice is investigating the use of satellite and radio-wave technology to monitor criminals.
But, instead of being contained in bracelets worn around the ankle, the tiny chips would be surgically inserted under the skin of offenders in the community, to help enforce home curfews. The radio frequency identification (RFID) tags, as long as two grains of rice, are able to carry scanable personal information about individuals, including their identities, address and offending record.
Saturday, January 12, 2008
BLAIR : LAST CHANCE FOR PEACE IN MIDDLE EAST
Haaretz is quoting Blair as saying [1]
"You've got to be careful of saying this is the last chance for it,...But it's hard for me to see how you're going to get a peace agreement done if the present initiative fails because if it fails things will move backwards again."
"If we lose the momentum that's been built up after the Annapolis conference and then the Paris conference where we got big international support for the Palestinians, if all of that is then squandered and drains away then I think you will find a very difficult situation indeed, so there is no alternative but to push forward and to do so with determination,"
"So far I remain cautiously optimistic that something can be done and I remain absolutely of the view that it has to be done,"
"Sure, it is absolutely possible to have a peace deal by the end of the year if people want to make it happen,"
So why is Blair taking a $1m job with JP Morgan while he is still Middle East peace envoy?
Is it so he can steer the Middle East into a situation so that he can 'advise' JP Morgan Chase how to profit from it?
Surely there is a conflict of interest in his two roles; brokering peace while working for one of the banks that has profitted enormously from world wars?
[1] http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/943920.html
"You've got to be careful of saying this is the last chance for it,...But it's hard for me to see how you're going to get a peace agreement done if the present initiative fails because if it fails things will move backwards again."
"If we lose the momentum that's been built up after the Annapolis conference and then the Paris conference where we got big international support for the Palestinians, if all of that is then squandered and drains away then I think you will find a very difficult situation indeed, so there is no alternative but to push forward and to do so with determination,"
"So far I remain cautiously optimistic that something can be done and I remain absolutely of the view that it has to be done,"
"Sure, it is absolutely possible to have a peace deal by the end of the year if people want to make it happen,"
So why is Blair taking a $1m job with JP Morgan while he is still Middle East peace envoy?
Is it so he can steer the Middle East into a situation so that he can 'advise' JP Morgan Chase how to profit from it?
Surely there is a conflict of interest in his two roles; brokering peace while working for one of the banks that has profitted enormously from world wars?
[1] http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/943920.html
Thursday, January 10, 2008
BLAIR TO ADVISE JP MORGAN CHASE
That f&%*^@# Blair has finally sold what ever remained of his soul. He is to advise JP Morgan Chase.
The history of Morgan is one of blood. The blood of our fathers and grandfathers and great grandfathers, who fought in Flanders mud, sailed on the cold Atlantic on frigates and destroyers during World War 1. The blood of those who died from the sinking of The Lusitania. The blood of those who died from the Russian Revolutions, the Red Terror and Stalin's famines and purges. The blood of those who died in World War 2. The blood of those who died at the hands of Mao Tse-tung.
Morgan was one of the great manipulators and financiers, who along with the Rockefellers, Jacob Schiff, and the Rothschilds, engineered the creation of the most tragic hoax ever foisted upon mankind, The Federal Reserve. The Federal Reserve allows its owners to create virtually unlimited quantities of money, which has been used to engineer and finance all the bloody world wars and revolutions, and genocidal economic policies that mankind suffered during the 20th Century. It is no coincidence that during the 20th Century we fought two world wars against each other. The Federal Reserve was able to finance it all, directly or indirectly. It is also no coincidence that during the 20th Century Communism grew into the power and threat it was. The Federal Reserve was able to finance it all, directly or indirectly.
With this act of betrayal to mankind, that f&%*^@# Blair has finally revealed to the world what a traitor to the human race he really is.
If he gives all his fees from this appointment to worthy causes and/or uses that money in ways that will teach his fellow man the common history of engineered bloodshed we all have, then perhaps we can begin to forgive him and accept him back into the human race.
But until then, if you see Blair in the street, do not talk to him. Turn your back to him and remain silent. Do not acknowledge him. For he is a f&%*^@# (and that is Faustus, not the rude six letter word beginning with f. count the letters)
The history of Morgan is one of blood. The blood of our fathers and grandfathers and great grandfathers, who fought in Flanders mud, sailed on the cold Atlantic on frigates and destroyers during World War 1. The blood of those who died from the sinking of The Lusitania. The blood of those who died from the Russian Revolutions, the Red Terror and Stalin's famines and purges. The blood of those who died in World War 2. The blood of those who died at the hands of Mao Tse-tung.
Morgan was one of the great manipulators and financiers, who along with the Rockefellers, Jacob Schiff, and the Rothschilds, engineered the creation of the most tragic hoax ever foisted upon mankind, The Federal Reserve. The Federal Reserve allows its owners to create virtually unlimited quantities of money, which has been used to engineer and finance all the bloody world wars and revolutions, and genocidal economic policies that mankind suffered during the 20th Century. It is no coincidence that during the 20th Century we fought two world wars against each other. The Federal Reserve was able to finance it all, directly or indirectly. It is also no coincidence that during the 20th Century Communism grew into the power and threat it was. The Federal Reserve was able to finance it all, directly or indirectly.
With this act of betrayal to mankind, that f&%*^@# Blair has finally revealed to the world what a traitor to the human race he really is.
If he gives all his fees from this appointment to worthy causes and/or uses that money in ways that will teach his fellow man the common history of engineered bloodshed we all have, then perhaps we can begin to forgive him and accept him back into the human race.
But until then, if you see Blair in the street, do not talk to him. Turn your back to him and remain silent. Do not acknowledge him. For he is a f&%*^@# (and that is Faustus, not the rude six letter word beginning with f. count the letters)
Wednesday, January 09, 2008
WHY WERE NEW HAMPSHIRE POLLS SO WRONG?
Perhaps they weren't.
Perhaps the voting mechanism was wrong!
Allegations are surfacing of vote rigging in New Hampshire. Votes for Ron Paul have not been counted.
The voting machines can be easily interfered with and the votes changed.
"Those who cast the votes decide nothing. Those who count the votes decide everything." - attributed to Josef Stalin.
Perhaps the voting mechanism was wrong!
Allegations are surfacing of vote rigging in New Hampshire. Votes for Ron Paul have not been counted.
The voting machines can be easily interfered with and the votes changed.
"Those who cast the votes decide nothing. Those who count the votes decide everything." - attributed to Josef Stalin.
Monday, January 07, 2008
NEARLY GULF OF TONKIN II
So many of us believe a Gulf of Tonkin-type event is scheduled in the Strait of Hormuz, to give pretext for war on Iran. Something is going to happen this year. Bush and Cheney have gone too far, done too much, to ever leave power.
But we'll know...
=========================
From http://www.guardian.co.uk/iran/story/0,,2236817,00.html
US ships 'threatened' by Iranian boats
Dan Glaister in Los Angeles
Monday January 7, 2008
Guardian Unlimited
Tensions between the US and Iran resurfaced today when Pentagon officials alleged that Iranian warships threatened three US Navy vessels in the Strait of Hormuz.
The alleged incident comes after a period of relative calm in relations between the two countries and ahead of a rare visit to Iran by Mohamed ElBaradei, the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency.
According to Pentagon officials, US forces were about to fire at the boats, thought to be from the Revolutionary Guard, when the Iranians turned away at the last moment.
But we'll know...
=========================
From http://www.guardian.co.uk/iran/story/0,,2236817,00.html
US ships 'threatened' by Iranian boats
Dan Glaister in Los Angeles
Monday January 7, 2008
Guardian Unlimited
Tensions between the US and Iran resurfaced today when Pentagon officials alleged that Iranian warships threatened three US Navy vessels in the Strait of Hormuz.
The alleged incident comes after a period of relative calm in relations between the two countries and ahead of a rare visit to Iran by Mohamed ElBaradei, the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency.
According to Pentagon officials, US forces were about to fire at the boats, thought to be from the Revolutionary Guard, when the Iranians turned away at the last moment.
Sunday, January 06, 2008
WEBSITE v BOOK
I am taking my website down for financial reasons (though this may be only temporarily for a few months). I have been compiling more research and compiling it into a book, which will be available free online quite soon.
In book format the info can be given or sent to certain people very easily, e.g. cd to friends and family, and in a more readable format. So far there are approaching 200 pages, which is readable within a few hours, with most of the chapters written and edited, but some sections still need to be verified.
After that? I dunno.
I definitely feel a big change coming.
In book format the info can be given or sent to certain people very easily, e.g. cd to friends and family, and in a more readable format. So far there are approaching 200 pages, which is readable within a few hours, with most of the chapters written and edited, but some sections still need to be verified.
After that? I dunno.
I definitely feel a big change coming.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)