whatever we want to happen will happen.
If we want peace, we will have peace.
If we want a fairer world, we will have a fairer world.
If we want to expose paedophile rings, we will expose paedophile rings.
It is up to us. Not them. Shit happens because we let it.
"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing" (or words to that effect) - Edmund Burke.
Monday, December 31, 2007
2007 WAS THE YEAR IN WHICH...
British military personnel were left unprotected in disputed waters in the Persian Gulf, and captured by Iran. But instead of resolving the dispute diplomatically, both Britain and the USA were willing to push it all the way to war.
Madeleine McCann was abducted just as awkward questions were being asked in British media about who knew what and when about 7/7. This troublesome line of questions ceased immediately and for several months a global campaign to Find Madeleine was followed in the mainstream media. There were the predictable and shameless suggestions that kids should be microchipped. However, no mention was ever made of the many thousands of kids who disappear, or hundreds of thousands of kids who die of malnutrition and/or preventable diseases due to genocidal policies such as those suggested by Henry "Ranting Scrooge" Kissinger in NSSM200.
The British war against Russia increased, with Russia exercising more control over Russia's natural resources, as well as Shell and BP. There were allegations that Berezovsky was to be assassinated, but the British intercepted the alleged assassin, but very strangely let the assassin go without any charge!? Berezovsky got over an hour on BBC to spew his vitriol against Putin. Russia subsequently sentenced Berezovsky in abenstia (for he would not go back to defend himself) to six years for embezzlement.
Following a visit to Russia, Saudi Arabia decided it would attend the Annapolis meeting, which encouraged Syria to also attend. There now appears to be some consensus on forming and following a regional peace mission. But then the turd in the punch bowl, ObL, released another statement (from the grave?) calling for war on Israel. Again, the timing is highly suspicious.
Madeleine McCann was abducted just as awkward questions were being asked in British media about who knew what and when about 7/7. This troublesome line of questions ceased immediately and for several months a global campaign to Find Madeleine was followed in the mainstream media. There were the predictable and shameless suggestions that kids should be microchipped. However, no mention was ever made of the many thousands of kids who disappear, or hundreds of thousands of kids who die of malnutrition and/or preventable diseases due to genocidal policies such as those suggested by Henry "Ranting Scrooge" Kissinger in NSSM200.
The British war against Russia increased, with Russia exercising more control over Russia's natural resources, as well as Shell and BP. There were allegations that Berezovsky was to be assassinated, but the British intercepted the alleged assassin, but very strangely let the assassin go without any charge!? Berezovsky got over an hour on BBC to spew his vitriol against Putin. Russia subsequently sentenced Berezovsky in abenstia (for he would not go back to defend himself) to six years for embezzlement.
Following a visit to Russia, Saudi Arabia decided it would attend the Annapolis meeting, which encouraged Syria to also attend. There now appears to be some consensus on forming and following a regional peace mission. But then the turd in the punch bowl, ObL, released another statement (from the grave?) calling for war on Israel. Again, the timing is highly suspicious.
EXTRA SPECIAL BLOGS
Here are two blogs of note;
http://aangirfan.blogspot.com/2007/12/back-to-stone-age.html
http://aangirfan.blogspot.com/2007/12/madeleine-mccann-murat-michaela-and-mi5.html
The first suggests why there is an attempt to destablilise Pakistan. I have to say that when I heard Musharraf make several claims against British Intelligence a year or so ago I thought he wasn't long for this world. I never thought that Bhutto would be sent in and assassinated to destabilise him.
The second suggests that the Portuguese investigation is being guided/corrupted by the global Freemason/paedophile ring. Readers should know already of my suspicion about the timing and media manipulation of Madeleine's abduction, as it occured just as our press was asking awkward questions about 7/7 and Operation Crevice and who knew what and when.
http://aangirfan.blogspot.com/2007/12/back-to-stone-age.html
http://aangirfan.blogspot.com/2007/12/madeleine-mccann-murat-michaela-and-mi5.html
The first suggests why there is an attempt to destablilise Pakistan. I have to say that when I heard Musharraf make several claims against British Intelligence a year or so ago I thought he wasn't long for this world. I never thought that Bhutto would be sent in and assassinated to destabilise him.
The second suggests that the Portuguese investigation is being guided/corrupted by the global Freemason/paedophile ring. Readers should know already of my suspicion about the timing and media manipulation of Madeleine's abduction, as it occured just as our press was asking awkward questions about 7/7 and Operation Crevice and who knew what and when.
Saturday, December 29, 2007
LONDON BANKERS HAVE LOST THE PLOT
In The Daily Telegraph today there is an arse-licking article entitled "Bankers and Kids", and it goes like this...
=======================
A friend in need on the City's doorstep
Last Updated: 3:20am GMT 29/12/2007
Supposedly hard-nosed bankers are changing the lives of deprived children, and at the same time gaining a new perspective on their own priorities. Josephine Moulds reports
John Bennett, consultant to hedge fund group Man Investments, has seen a lot in his 30-year career in the City. He watched the 1987 market crash and subsequent Names scandal at Lloyd's of London while entrenched in the insurance industry, then he ran the financial advisory business of a top 20 accountancy firm, taking him to his current job at Man.
Volunteers at Kids Company; A friend in need on the City's doorstep
Volunteers can help brighten up the environment, lead drama sessions or simply give the children what they need most - time, attention and something to aspire to
However, despite living in interesting times, one of his most memorable moments recently has not come from the troubled credit markets but from Mark, a young man he mentors.
Despite his crippling shyness, Mark had agreed to make a speech to a crowd of 200 people about Kids Company, the charity that supported him when he was kicked out of home.
Bennett helped him write the speech, and all the way along reassured his charge that he would happily step in at the last minute if Mark lost his nerve, or take over halfway through if necessary.
On the day, a large audience of luminaries gathered, among them Bob Geldof and BBC grandee Alan Yentob. Mark stood up and started to read the speech. But then he stopped, put down his notes and spoke from the heart about this fantastic charity and what it had done for him.
It was a tearful moment, a happy tale of triumph over adversity. "You can't buy that sort of stuff," says Bennett, who has volunteered as a mentor with Kids Company for the past two years. Set up in 1996, the London-based charity has flourished under founder Camila Batmanghelidjh to become a reference point for children's organisations across the country. Batmanghelidjh herself is so well known and commands such respect among politicians that she is helping shape government policy towards children.
=============================
The overall aim of the article is to portray "supposedly hard-nosed bankers" in a very charitable light, and asks the question; How can the bankers be such genocidal bastards if they can fork out thousands to help poor kids just a mile away from their luxurious offices?
Kids Company sounds very much like the Rothschild scheme to help kids. I posted about that scheme after finding a report about corporate social responsibility on the Rothschild website. In their scheme Rothschild employees (though not the Rothschilds themselves) act as mentors to local under-priviliged kids, helping with their maths etc.
If only the teachers involved knew the real power the bankers have, and how that power has been abused for selfish megalomaniac purposes, sending man to fight man in needless world wars in order to gain total control of the world.
One has to ask why such an article has been compiled and published?
===================================
Imagine there’s no bankers
It’s easy if you try
No more wars or hunger
Just peace beneath a pale blue sky
Imagine all the people living life in peace, yoo hoo
Imagine there’s no bankers
Preying on the poor
With their vulture hedge funds
And always wanting more
Imagine all the people living for themselves, yay hay
You may say I’m a dreamer
But I’m not the only one
Wanting control over our money
So the world will live as one
Imagine there’s no bankers
Issuing all our money
Which is created out of nothing
So we live in virtual slavery
Imagine all the people living happily, yoo hoo
Imagine there’s no bankers
Financing all the genocide
Creating Hitlers and Stalins
To force us into taking sides
Imagine all the people living life in peace, yay hay
You may say I’m a dreamer
But I’m not the only one
Wanting control over our money
So the world will live as one
Imagine there’s no bankers
Wanting to rule us all
Through their blood-soaked UN
From behind a large concrete wall
Imagine there's no bankers
Controlling all of the world
Through their selected leaders
Selected at Bilderberg
Imagine all the people living in freedom, yoo hoo
You may say I’m a dreamer
But I’m not the only one
Wanting control over our money
So the world will live as one
=======================
A friend in need on the City's doorstep
Last Updated: 3:20am GMT 29/12/2007
Supposedly hard-nosed bankers are changing the lives of deprived children, and at the same time gaining a new perspective on their own priorities. Josephine Moulds reports
John Bennett, consultant to hedge fund group Man Investments, has seen a lot in his 30-year career in the City. He watched the 1987 market crash and subsequent Names scandal at Lloyd's of London while entrenched in the insurance industry, then he ran the financial advisory business of a top 20 accountancy firm, taking him to his current job at Man.
Volunteers at Kids Company; A friend in need on the City's doorstep
Volunteers can help brighten up the environment, lead drama sessions or simply give the children what they need most - time, attention and something to aspire to
However, despite living in interesting times, one of his most memorable moments recently has not come from the troubled credit markets but from Mark, a young man he mentors.
Despite his crippling shyness, Mark had agreed to make a speech to a crowd of 200 people about Kids Company, the charity that supported him when he was kicked out of home.
Bennett helped him write the speech, and all the way along reassured his charge that he would happily step in at the last minute if Mark lost his nerve, or take over halfway through if necessary.
On the day, a large audience of luminaries gathered, among them Bob Geldof and BBC grandee Alan Yentob. Mark stood up and started to read the speech. But then he stopped, put down his notes and spoke from the heart about this fantastic charity and what it had done for him.
It was a tearful moment, a happy tale of triumph over adversity. "You can't buy that sort of stuff," says Bennett, who has volunteered as a mentor with Kids Company for the past two years. Set up in 1996, the London-based charity has flourished under founder Camila Batmanghelidjh to become a reference point for children's organisations across the country. Batmanghelidjh herself is so well known and commands such respect among politicians that she is helping shape government policy towards children.
=============================
The overall aim of the article is to portray "supposedly hard-nosed bankers" in a very charitable light, and asks the question; How can the bankers be such genocidal bastards if they can fork out thousands to help poor kids just a mile away from their luxurious offices?
Kids Company sounds very much like the Rothschild scheme to help kids. I posted about that scheme after finding a report about corporate social responsibility on the Rothschild website. In their scheme Rothschild employees (though not the Rothschilds themselves) act as mentors to local under-priviliged kids, helping with their maths etc.
If only the teachers involved knew the real power the bankers have, and how that power has been abused for selfish megalomaniac purposes, sending man to fight man in needless world wars in order to gain total control of the world.
One has to ask why such an article has been compiled and published?
===================================
Imagine there’s no bankers
It’s easy if you try
No more wars or hunger
Just peace beneath a pale blue sky
Imagine all the people living life in peace, yoo hoo
Imagine there’s no bankers
Preying on the poor
With their vulture hedge funds
And always wanting more
Imagine all the people living for themselves, yay hay
You may say I’m a dreamer
But I’m not the only one
Wanting control over our money
So the world will live as one
Imagine there’s no bankers
Issuing all our money
Which is created out of nothing
So we live in virtual slavery
Imagine all the people living happily, yoo hoo
Imagine there’s no bankers
Financing all the genocide
Creating Hitlers and Stalins
To force us into taking sides
Imagine all the people living life in peace, yay hay
You may say I’m a dreamer
But I’m not the only one
Wanting control over our money
So the world will live as one
Imagine there’s no bankers
Wanting to rule us all
Through their blood-soaked UN
From behind a large concrete wall
Imagine there's no bankers
Controlling all of the world
Through their selected leaders
Selected at Bilderberg
Imagine all the people living in freedom, yoo hoo
You may say I’m a dreamer
But I’m not the only one
Wanting control over our money
So the world will live as one
Wednesday, December 26, 2007
ROBERT MORRIS
I had never really looked at Morris before. I had known he was behind the Bank of North America, but didn't know that much about him. Since Anton Chaitkin recently published an article on President Andrew Jackson I have been revising my limited knowledge of the American Revolution.
Robert Morris became the financier of the American Revolution. Morris had built a fortune from his partnership with Thomas Willing in Willing Morris and Company, which dealt in import, export and banking. This occurred due to his election as Superintendent of Finance from 1781 to 1784. As Superintendent of Finance he requested that he also be able to do business, even though he may profit from some of his decisions. If he did make personal profit then he later ploughed it into personally financing the revolution from his own pocket, risking everything he had. In this position Morris proposed the creation of a national bank, called The Bank of North America. The revolutionaries were broke and credit was extremely hard to get. Morris was one of the wealthiest,if not the wealthiest, men supporting the revolution and supplied some of the capital for the bank, but it was insufficient. Benjamin Franklin persuaded the French to loan the revolutionaries some gold to finance the revolution. Morris then had this deposited in the newly created Bank of North America, and used fractional reserve banking to create many millions in paper money which was then used to buy the bank stock, and to pay the revolutionaries and for supplies. Morris also risked his own credit and finances to pay for certain Continental Army operations, including the defeat of Cornwallis. So for this Morris was known as The Financier.
After the war of independence, Morris went back into the import and export business, and was a well respected man for his endeavours to finance the revolution. He quickly built up another fortune, and bought several million acres of land anticipating building farms and great towns for the expected great influx of immigrants, but the mass immigration never occurred and he began to owe his latest fortune and more. Morris proposed Washington as President. On becoming President, Washington asked Morris to become Secretary of the Treasury. Morris refused and instead proposed Alexander Hamilton. Morris had earlier written “On Public Credit” in which he proposed a national bank. One of Hamilton’s first duties was to solve the monetary crisis of the new republic which was seriously in debt. Hamilton proposed the First Bank of the United States, which was controlled by Morris’ partner Thomas Willing and was based on Morris’ ideas of public credit.
Morris later spent four years in debtors’ prison due to the failed land purchases. New laws were enacted to get Morris out debtor's prison. A few years after release he died in poverty in 1806.
Morris' story has persuaded me that money is a very, very complex concept, and the study of money is perhaps one of the greatest challenges to man. I still believe very strongly that the power to create money should never ever be in private hands as it is today, for it gives way too much power to certain people who, as they have shown, cannot be trusted with it and abuse that power for their own selfish megalomaniac purposes. During the US Civil War Abraham Lincoln saved the USA from the international bankers with Greenbacks, which were paper money backed by virtually nothing, but the country had faith in them and so they were accepted which kept the Union. Similarly, it would seem that Morris proposed nearly the same thing as Lincoln, but there was an element of privateering, but I believe any profit that Morris did make he used to pay for the revolution.
Robert Morris became the financier of the American Revolution. Morris had built a fortune from his partnership with Thomas Willing in Willing Morris and Company, which dealt in import, export and banking. This occurred due to his election as Superintendent of Finance from 1781 to 1784. As Superintendent of Finance he requested that he also be able to do business, even though he may profit from some of his decisions. If he did make personal profit then he later ploughed it into personally financing the revolution from his own pocket, risking everything he had. In this position Morris proposed the creation of a national bank, called The Bank of North America. The revolutionaries were broke and credit was extremely hard to get. Morris was one of the wealthiest,if not the wealthiest, men supporting the revolution and supplied some of the capital for the bank, but it was insufficient. Benjamin Franklin persuaded the French to loan the revolutionaries some gold to finance the revolution. Morris then had this deposited in the newly created Bank of North America, and used fractional reserve banking to create many millions in paper money which was then used to buy the bank stock, and to pay the revolutionaries and for supplies. Morris also risked his own credit and finances to pay for certain Continental Army operations, including the defeat of Cornwallis. So for this Morris was known as The Financier.
After the war of independence, Morris went back into the import and export business, and was a well respected man for his endeavours to finance the revolution. He quickly built up another fortune, and bought several million acres of land anticipating building farms and great towns for the expected great influx of immigrants, but the mass immigration never occurred and he began to owe his latest fortune and more. Morris proposed Washington as President. On becoming President, Washington asked Morris to become Secretary of the Treasury. Morris refused and instead proposed Alexander Hamilton. Morris had earlier written “On Public Credit” in which he proposed a national bank. One of Hamilton’s first duties was to solve the monetary crisis of the new republic which was seriously in debt. Hamilton proposed the First Bank of the United States, which was controlled by Morris’ partner Thomas Willing and was based on Morris’ ideas of public credit.
Morris later spent four years in debtors’ prison due to the failed land purchases. New laws were enacted to get Morris out debtor's prison. A few years after release he died in poverty in 1806.
Morris' story has persuaded me that money is a very, very complex concept, and the study of money is perhaps one of the greatest challenges to man. I still believe very strongly that the power to create money should never ever be in private hands as it is today, for it gives way too much power to certain people who, as they have shown, cannot be trusted with it and abuse that power for their own selfish megalomaniac purposes. During the US Civil War Abraham Lincoln saved the USA from the international bankers with Greenbacks, which were paper money backed by virtually nothing, but the country had faith in them and so they were accepted which kept the Union. Similarly, it would seem that Morris proposed nearly the same thing as Lincoln, but there was an element of privateering, but I believe any profit that Morris did make he used to pay for the revolution.
Tuesday, December 25, 2007
INVESTIGATE ISRAELI INFILTRATION OF BRITISH POLITICS
A group of very concerned British citizens have written a letter to the Committee on Standards in Public Life calling for an investigation into the Israeli influence on British politics. They ask that everyone who supports this call write to the committee urging such an investigation.
Mr Peter Ramsden
Secretary to the Committee
Committee on Standards in Public Life
35 Great Smith Street
London SW1P 3BQ
email: public@standards.x.gsi.gov.uk
I believe there is alot more going on than just Israeli brutality. I believe that such brutality is designed to provoke outrage and encourage terrorism, on both sides, to provoke world war. Others believe that Israel is, or was, part of a British Imperialist strategy in the Middle East focused on oil. Others simply believe it is "the Jews". Either way, such brutality must be stopped.
======================
From http://www.unobserver.com/layout5.php?id=4209&blz=1
WILL NOBODY BRING CHRISTMAS CHEER TO BESIEGED AND STARVING GAZA?
2007-12-23 | Group urges Standards Committee to stamp out Israeli influence that paralyses heart of British government
As the twenty-one month long siege of Gaza becomes a death sentence for yet more civilians, a group in the UK with experience of the Occupied Territories is urging the Committee on Standards in Public Life to examine whether there is undue Israeli influence at the heart of British government.
The blockade stops vital medical supplies going in and prevents chronically sick patients (including children) transferring to proper hospital treatment outside Gaza. Israel’s deep penetration of our political system, says the group, is preventing Britain from taking a principled stand on Middle East matters, including the long catalogue of grotesque violations of Palestinian human rights, of which the Gaza siege is only the latest example. Conservative Friends of Israel, for example, claim the support of 80 percent of Tory MPs.
Signatories to the letter include Mona Baker, Karl Sabbagh, Derek Summerfield and Felicity Arbuthnot.
Spokesman for the group is David Halpin, a trauma surgeon, who has spent all of the last five years of his retirement standing with the Palestinians for Justice. He has seen the destruction of lives, limbs, livings and hope at first hand. He advised the Hamas government how they should investigate the use of illegal weapons by Israel. In March, he lead a team of seven UK doctors into Gaza. The Dove and Dolphin Medical Centre was opened then. This is named after the symbolic voyage he led five years ago from which the charity was named... www.doveanddolphin.co.uk
He says: "It is insufficient that humans should weep beneath the crucifixion of the Palestine people in 2007 AD. They must halt it forthwith."
Mr Peter Ramsden
Secretary to the Committee
Committee on Standards in Public Life
35 Great Smith Street
London SW1P 3BQ
email: public@standards.x.gsi.gov.uk
I believe there is alot more going on than just Israeli brutality. I believe that such brutality is designed to provoke outrage and encourage terrorism, on both sides, to provoke world war. Others believe that Israel is, or was, part of a British Imperialist strategy in the Middle East focused on oil. Others simply believe it is "the Jews". Either way, such brutality must be stopped.
======================
From http://www.unobserver.com/layout5.php?id=4209&blz=1
WILL NOBODY BRING CHRISTMAS CHEER TO BESIEGED AND STARVING GAZA?
2007-12-23 | Group urges Standards Committee to stamp out Israeli influence that paralyses heart of British government
As the twenty-one month long siege of Gaza becomes a death sentence for yet more civilians, a group in the UK with experience of the Occupied Territories is urging the Committee on Standards in Public Life to examine whether there is undue Israeli influence at the heart of British government.
The blockade stops vital medical supplies going in and prevents chronically sick patients (including children) transferring to proper hospital treatment outside Gaza. Israel’s deep penetration of our political system, says the group, is preventing Britain from taking a principled stand on Middle East matters, including the long catalogue of grotesque violations of Palestinian human rights, of which the Gaza siege is only the latest example. Conservative Friends of Israel, for example, claim the support of 80 percent of Tory MPs.
Signatories to the letter include Mona Baker, Karl Sabbagh, Derek Summerfield and Felicity Arbuthnot.
Spokesman for the group is David Halpin, a trauma surgeon, who has spent all of the last five years of his retirement standing with the Palestinians for Justice. He has seen the destruction of lives, limbs, livings and hope at first hand. He advised the Hamas government how they should investigate the use of illegal weapons by Israel. In March, he lead a team of seven UK doctors into Gaza. The Dove and Dolphin Medical Centre was opened then. This is named after the symbolic voyage he led five years ago from which the charity was named... www.doveanddolphin.co.uk
He says: "It is insufficient that humans should weep beneath the crucifixion of the Palestine people in 2007 AD. They must halt it forthwith."
LOVE AND HATE ON CHRISTMAS DAY
Even though I know today is actually a load of bollocks, and is based on an ancient babylonian sun religion, I wish everyone a merry christmas (in that I believe in the sentiment and intention, but not the religion itself).
Everyone, that is, except the international-warmongering-bankster-traitors-to-the-human-race, and their minions, gofers and puppets, and the satanists they front for. They are the most detested beings on this planet. But what do they care? They've got billions, can easily create more billions for themselves and war, and think they own the world.
2008 WILL be the year.
But for now, relax and enjoy the fake holidays given to us by our jailers.
Everyone, that is, except the international-warmongering-bankster-traitors-to-the-human-race, and their minions, gofers and puppets, and the satanists they front for. They are the most detested beings on this planet. But what do they care? They've got billions, can easily create more billions for themselves and war, and think they own the world.
2008 WILL be the year.
But for now, relax and enjoy the fake holidays given to us by our jailers.
Saturday, December 22, 2007
PUTIN’S ALLEGED $40 BILLION FORTUNE
An allegation was made in Die Welt on 12th November that Vladimir Putin was sitting on a fortune, which he had accrued during his tenure in the Kremlin after appointing comrades to powerful positions. The allegation was made by Stanislav Belkovsky. In 2002 Belkovsky co-founded The Council for National Strategy, resigned from that, and then co-founded the National Strategy Institute in 2004.
So who financed Belkovsky’s The Council for National Strategy and National Strategy Institute?
Belkovsky is credited with either predicting, preparing the Russian public for, or warning the Russian public of, the assault on Yukos and Khodorkovsky in a series of articles in 2003 and blaming it on a group of oligarchs.
However, several commentators have linked Belkovsky with Boris Berezovsky, but, as far as I know, no evidence has been put forth to support this. One such article entitled “Oligarchs, True and False”, by Vladimir Pribylovsky was published by The Jamestown Foundation, which has Zbigniew Brzezinski on its board.
The allegations made by Belkovsky about Putin’s fortune were made at an opportune time for certain people. The substance of those allegations also adds to the opportunism. Belkovsky also alleged that the Russian economy is about to fail, that Putin has been lucky with high oil prices, and that Putin would retire from politics and take up a high profile position, for example as head of the International Olympic Committee, just to protect himself from internal and external enemies.
The allegations were published on 12th November in Die Welt. The Russian elections were held a few weeks later on the 2nd December. Die Welt is published by Axel Springer AG, which openly supports Israel, was one of several European newspapers to publish the cartoons of Mohammed in early 2006 that sparked Muslim riots across the world, and is managed by Bilderberger (2005) Matthias Dopfner.
Following Time magazine awarding Putin the title Man of the Year 2007, the Belkovsky allegations resurfaced in UK newspapers.
Today, one of the allegations made by Belkovsky has been debunked. The oil company Gunvor was alleged by Belkovsky to be at least 75% controlled by Putin. Gunvor’s CEO Torbjorn Tornqvist has today written a letter to The Guardian in reply to The Guardian’s article on Belkovsky’s claims published on 21st December. Gunvor states;
I think there is trick, trick, trickery afoot from certain camps based in London, trying to capitalise on, or engineer, destabilization brought about since Putin named his preferred successor. The website http://www.apn.ru is reportedly run by the The National Strategy Institute [1], and is believed to be financed by Berezovsky.[2]
Examine the timing and accuracy of the allegations;
1.a few weeks before the Russian parliamentary elections, Belkovsky claims Putin is sitting on a multi-billion dollar fortune.
2.The allegations are printed in a pro-Israel, Muslim-hating German newspaper run by a Bilderberger.
3.a few days after Putin is named Man of the Year, and he has named his preferred successor, the same allegations are recycled in The Guardian.
4.today, one of those allegations has been denied in a letter to The Guardian.
[1]http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/news/russia/2007/russia-070925-rferl02.htm
[2]http://www.rferl.org/specials/russia/babitsky/part2.asp
So who financed Belkovsky’s The Council for National Strategy and National Strategy Institute?
Belkovsky is credited with either predicting, preparing the Russian public for, or warning the Russian public of, the assault on Yukos and Khodorkovsky in a series of articles in 2003 and blaming it on a group of oligarchs.
However, several commentators have linked Belkovsky with Boris Berezovsky, but, as far as I know, no evidence has been put forth to support this. One such article entitled “Oligarchs, True and False”, by Vladimir Pribylovsky was published by The Jamestown Foundation, which has Zbigniew Brzezinski on its board.
The allegations made by Belkovsky about Putin’s fortune were made at an opportune time for certain people. The substance of those allegations also adds to the opportunism. Belkovsky also alleged that the Russian economy is about to fail, that Putin has been lucky with high oil prices, and that Putin would retire from politics and take up a high profile position, for example as head of the International Olympic Committee, just to protect himself from internal and external enemies.
The allegations were published on 12th November in Die Welt. The Russian elections were held a few weeks later on the 2nd December. Die Welt is published by Axel Springer AG, which openly supports Israel, was one of several European newspapers to publish the cartoons of Mohammed in early 2006 that sparked Muslim riots across the world, and is managed by Bilderberger (2005) Matthias Dopfner.
Following Time magazine awarding Putin the title Man of the Year 2007, the Belkovsky allegations resurfaced in UK newspapers.
Today, one of the allegations made by Belkovsky has been debunked. The oil company Gunvor was alleged by Belkovsky to be at least 75% controlled by Putin. Gunvor’s CEO Torbjorn Tornqvist has today written a letter to The Guardian in reply to The Guardian’s article on Belkovsky’s claims published on 21st December. Gunvor states;
“Your story (Putin, the Kremlin power struggle and the $40bn fortune, December 21) contained serious inaccuracies about Gunvor, the oil-trading firm of which I am the chief executive officer. In fairness to the Guardian, which I know to be a reputable and serious newspaper, you are not the first to print information about supposed links to President Putin.
First, it is plain wrong to state that President Putin owns any part of Gunvor, or is a beneficiary of its activities. This company is majority owned by its founders, Guennadi Timtchenko and myself, with a minority of the shares held by a third investor. None of the shares in this organisation are held by President Putin or by anyone allied with him.
The media seem to believe that this company makes multibillion-dollar profits each year, and that it mysteriously enjoys profit margins way out of kilter with others in the oil-trading sector. I wish this were the case, but the truth is that our profits are in the hundreds of millions, not the billions; this is the norm for a business of our scale operating in our sector. We are a well-run organisation and I am proud of our activities and our record - but it is simply wrong to suggest that we benefit from favours granted over trading contracts in Russia and leading to multibillion-dollar profits.
Some of the inaccurate stories about Gunvor seem to have gained currency because my co-founder, Mr Timtchenko, did indeed know President Putin in the days before the latter became famous. However, suggestions that they share a KGB heritage or have been in business together are wide of the mark.
Torbjorn Tornqvist
CEO, Gunvor Group, Geneva..”
I think there is trick, trick, trickery afoot from certain camps based in London, trying to capitalise on, or engineer, destabilization brought about since Putin named his preferred successor. The website http://www.apn.ru is reportedly run by the The National Strategy Institute [1], and is believed to be financed by Berezovsky.[2]
Examine the timing and accuracy of the allegations;
1.a few weeks before the Russian parliamentary elections, Belkovsky claims Putin is sitting on a multi-billion dollar fortune.
2.The allegations are printed in a pro-Israel, Muslim-hating German newspaper run by a Bilderberger.
3.a few days after Putin is named Man of the Year, and he has named his preferred successor, the same allegations are recycled in The Guardian.
4.today, one of those allegations has been denied in a letter to The Guardian.
[1]http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/news/russia/2007/russia-070925-rferl02.htm
[2]http://www.rferl.org/specials/russia/babitsky/part2.asp
Sunday, December 16, 2007
DECREASE BANK CAPITAL REQUIREMENT?
Yesterday in The Daily Telegraph Peter Spencer of Ernst & Young suggested that the capital requirement for banks be decreased from 8% to 6%. He suggested this would spark a rise in the number of interbank loans and thus ease the current "credit crisis".
What will he suggest if this doesn't work? A 0% capital requirement? Is this the ultimate goal of the engineered "credit crisis"?
I do not believe that this crisis appeared out of nowhere undetected. Something like the saga surrounding Nick Leeson I can believe occuring undetected. But in this crisis major banks are losing billions.
The system is a lot closer to 0% capital requirement anyway. Any bank notes declared as capital are worthless in themselves, and can only be exchanged for yet more paper with different coloured ink on them.
============================
From http://www.larouchepac.com/news/2007/12/15/banks-are-insolvent-so-ease-rules-auditor-says.html
Banks Are Insolvent, So Ease the Rules, Auditor Says
Increase Decrease
December 15, 2007 (LPAC)--Auditors are in a tough spot these post-Enron days, with the demise of Arthur Andersen on everyone's mind. If the auditors refuse to rubber-stamp the banks' fictitious valuations, the banks collapse,-- but if the auditors allow the fiction, they run the risk of being severely punished for malfeasance down the road. Hence the suggestion by Ernst & Young Item Club's Peter Spencer in today's London Telegraph, that the British "government must suspend a set of key banking regulations at the heart of the current financial crisis, or risk seeing the economy spiral towards a future that could `make 1929 look like a walk in the park'."
Spencer tries to blunt the clear meaning of his statement, by claiming that the banks are refusing to lend to each other, not because they are insolvent, but rather that they are being prevented from lending to each other by overly restrictive government regulations! The regulations he blames are the capital requirements set by the international Basel agreements, which require the banks to have an 8 percent capital reserve, which Spencer said should be cut to about 6 percent.
In reality, the idea that a mere 2 percent reduction in capital requirements would head off a crisis that would make 1929 look like a "walk in the park," is absurd, as both Spencer and the Telegraph know. What the auditors are really saying, is that the banks are already insolvent, and that the capital requirements must be lowered so that the auditors can continue to certify their books. Which is only an indirect way of admitting the banks are indeed insolvent, despite his denial.
What will he suggest if this doesn't work? A 0% capital requirement? Is this the ultimate goal of the engineered "credit crisis"?
I do not believe that this crisis appeared out of nowhere undetected. Something like the saga surrounding Nick Leeson I can believe occuring undetected. But in this crisis major banks are losing billions.
The system is a lot closer to 0% capital requirement anyway. Any bank notes declared as capital are worthless in themselves, and can only be exchanged for yet more paper with different coloured ink on them.
============================
From http://www.larouchepac.com/news/2007/12/15/banks-are-insolvent-so-ease-rules-auditor-says.html
Banks Are Insolvent, So Ease the Rules, Auditor Says
Increase Decrease
December 15, 2007 (LPAC)--Auditors are in a tough spot these post-Enron days, with the demise of Arthur Andersen on everyone's mind. If the auditors refuse to rubber-stamp the banks' fictitious valuations, the banks collapse,-- but if the auditors allow the fiction, they run the risk of being severely punished for malfeasance down the road. Hence the suggestion by Ernst & Young Item Club's Peter Spencer in today's London Telegraph, that the British "government must suspend a set of key banking regulations at the heart of the current financial crisis, or risk seeing the economy spiral towards a future that could `make 1929 look like a walk in the park'."
Spencer tries to blunt the clear meaning of his statement, by claiming that the banks are refusing to lend to each other, not because they are insolvent, but rather that they are being prevented from lending to each other by overly restrictive government regulations! The regulations he blames are the capital requirements set by the international Basel agreements, which require the banks to have an 8 percent capital reserve, which Spencer said should be cut to about 6 percent.
In reality, the idea that a mere 2 percent reduction in capital requirements would head off a crisis that would make 1929 look like a "walk in the park," is absurd, as both Spencer and the Telegraph know. What the auditors are really saying, is that the banks are already insolvent, and that the capital requirements must be lowered so that the auditors can continue to certify their books. Which is only an indirect way of admitting the banks are indeed insolvent, despite his denial.
Friday, December 14, 2007
TREACHERY WITH A SMILE
Here is treachery with a smile.
This is Gordon Brown signing a document that increases the power of the organisation that we were told in the 1970's would just be a common market. That organisation is now assuming the role of a large nation; President, Army, foreign policy, currency, etc. Similar organisations are appearing in Africa, Asia, Americas.
This is Gordon Brown signing a document that increases the power of the organisation that we were told in the 1970's would just be a common market. That organisation is now assuming the role of a large nation; President, Army, foreign policy, currency, etc. Similar organisations are appearing in Africa, Asia, Americas.
Thursday, December 13, 2007
C'MON W! LET'S ALL GET PIST ON PEACE!
Ace ranter Henry Kissinger, like John Bolton last week, has been allowed to publish yet another rant in the WP. And like Bolton, everyone's favourite ranter Kissinger attacks the US intelligence community for coming up with the wrong estimate on Iran (wrong for the warmongers anyway).
It is highly significant that both Bolton and Kissinger have been able to write sucharticles rants in the WP. Both are vehement warmongering Israel-firsters.
It is also highly significant that neither have mentioned Israel's nukes, which we are 100% confident exist thanks to the Rothschilds, and neither have mentioned the US Army War College finding in 2006 that should Israel "de-nuke" then the nuclear arms race in the Middle East would not exist, and we wouldn't be having all these rants and threats of war.
So c'mon W! Let's all get pissed on peace. If reports are to be believed, you are intent on leaving a lasting peace in the Middle East. Kissinger, Bolton, Cheney etc are all traitors. Traitors not just to America, but to the whole human race.
NB note the title of Kissy's article. "Why Spying and Policymaking Don't Mix". Did he write a similar article about Feith and the Office of Special Plans before Iraq? I don't recall reading one.
============================
From http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/12/12/AR2007121202331.html
Misreading the Iran Report
Why Spying and Policymaking Don't Mix
By Henry A. Kissinger
Thursday, December 13, 2007; Page A35
The extraordinary spectacle of the president's national security adviser obliged to defend the president's Iran policy against a National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) raises two core issues: How are we now to judge the nuclear threat posed by Iran? How are we to judge the intelligence community's relationship with the White House and the rest of the government?
It is highly significant that both Bolton and Kissinger have been able to write such
It is also highly significant that neither have mentioned Israel's nukes, which we are 100% confident exist thanks to the Rothschilds, and neither have mentioned the US Army War College finding in 2006 that should Israel "de-nuke" then the nuclear arms race in the Middle East would not exist, and we wouldn't be having all these rants and threats of war.
So c'mon W! Let's all get pissed on peace. If reports are to be believed, you are intent on leaving a lasting peace in the Middle East. Kissinger, Bolton, Cheney etc are all traitors. Traitors not just to America, but to the whole human race.
NB note the title of Kissy's article. "Why Spying and Policymaking Don't Mix". Did he write a similar article about Feith and the Office of Special Plans before Iraq? I don't recall reading one.
============================
From http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/12/12/AR2007121202331.html
Misreading the Iran Report
Why Spying and Policymaking Don't Mix
By Henry A. Kissinger
Thursday, December 13, 2007; Page A35
The extraordinary spectacle of the president's national security adviser obliged to defend the president's Iran policy against a National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) raises two core issues: How are we now to judge the nuclear threat posed by Iran? How are we to judge the intelligence community's relationship with the White House and the rest of the government?
Friday, December 07, 2007
IMAGINE
Imagine there’s no bankers
It’s easy if you try
No more wars or hunger
Just peace beneath a pale blue sky
Imagine all the people living life in peace, yoo hoo
Imagine there’s no bankers
Preying on the poor
With their vulture hedge funds
And always wanting more
Imagine all the people living for themselves, yay hay
You may say I’m a dreamer
But I’m not the only one
Wanting control over our money
So the world will live as one
Imagine there’s no bankers
Issuing all our money
Which is created out of nothing
So we live in virtual slavery
Imagine all the people living happily, yoo hoo
Imagine there’s no bankers
Financing all the genocide
Creating Hitlers and Stalins
To force us into taking sides
Imagine all the people living life in peace, yay hay
You may say I’m a dreamer
But I’m not the only one
Wanting control over our money
So the world will live as one
Imagine there’s no bankers
Wanting to rule us all
Through their blood-soaked UN
From behind a large concrete wall
Imagine there's no bankers
Controlling all of the world
Through their selected leaders
Selected at Bilderberg
Imagine all the people living in freedom, yoo hoo
You may say I’m a dreamer
But I’m not the only one
Wanting control over our money
So the world will live as one
It’s easy if you try
No more wars or hunger
Just peace beneath a pale blue sky
Imagine all the people living life in peace, yoo hoo
Imagine there’s no bankers
Preying on the poor
With their vulture hedge funds
And always wanting more
Imagine all the people living for themselves, yay hay
You may say I’m a dreamer
But I’m not the only one
Wanting control over our money
So the world will live as one
Imagine there’s no bankers
Issuing all our money
Which is created out of nothing
So we live in virtual slavery
Imagine all the people living happily, yoo hoo
Imagine there’s no bankers
Financing all the genocide
Creating Hitlers and Stalins
To force us into taking sides
Imagine all the people living life in peace, yay hay
You may say I’m a dreamer
But I’m not the only one
Wanting control over our money
So the world will live as one
Imagine there’s no bankers
Wanting to rule us all
Through their blood-soaked UN
From behind a large concrete wall
Imagine there's no bankers
Controlling all of the world
Through their selected leaders
Selected at Bilderberg
Imagine all the people living in freedom, yoo hoo
You may say I’m a dreamer
But I’m not the only one
Wanting control over our money
So the world will live as one
Thursday, December 06, 2007
THE MORALITY OF TOP LAWYERS
There is an interesting report in The Daily Mail today about lawyers.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=499997&in_page_id=1770
The headline that caught my eye was "Female partner at leading solicitors had threesome with two young trainees".
This caught my eye because kids read the internet, right?
I can see a number of conversations along the lines of
"Mummy? Daddy? What's a threesome?".
"Well, it's where three..."
But the last couple of paragraphs is where the real story is.
The report is actually based on a survey of lawyers in the annual Christmas quiz set by lawyers' magazine Legal Business.
The last paragraph of the report is
"Our quiz seems to suggest that morality levels in the legal profession are directly linked to earnings, with one decreasing as the other increases."
There are very highly paid men and women lawyers in The City of London and Wall Street prepared to stand up for and protect the world war mongers and creaters of genocidal economic programs.
Paul Weller while in The Style Council wrote the following lyrics for "The Whole Point of No Return", which contains the following line
The laws made for and by the rich
Why is the law made for and by the rich?
Why are they rich in the first place?
Because the banking system gives them power to create virtually unlimited quantities of money, to pay greedy and traitors-to-the-human-race lawyers to write up and defend the law.
That threesome is nowhere near the immorality of the top lawyers.
============================================
"The Whole Point of No Return" by The Style Council
The lords and ladies pass a ruling
That sons and girls go hand in land
From good stock and the best breeding
Paid for by the servile class
Who have been told all lie in state
To bow down forth and face their fate
Its so easy.
So, so easy
All righteousness did build thy arrow
To shoot it straight into their lies
Who would expect the mighty sparrow
Could rid our world of all their kind?
Rising up and taking back
The property of every man
Oh its easy.
So, so easy
Rising up to break this thing
From family trees the dukes do swing
Just one blow to scratch the itch
The laws made for and by the rich
It would be easy.
So, so easy.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=499997&in_page_id=1770
The headline that caught my eye was "Female partner at leading solicitors had threesome with two young trainees".
This caught my eye because kids read the internet, right?
I can see a number of conversations along the lines of
"Mummy? Daddy? What's a threesome?".
"Well, it's where three..."
But the last couple of paragraphs is where the real story is.
The report is actually based on a survey of lawyers in the annual Christmas quiz set by lawyers' magazine Legal Business.
The last paragraph of the report is
"Our quiz seems to suggest that morality levels in the legal profession are directly linked to earnings, with one decreasing as the other increases."
There are very highly paid men and women lawyers in The City of London and Wall Street prepared to stand up for and protect the world war mongers and creaters of genocidal economic programs.
Paul Weller while in The Style Council wrote the following lyrics for "The Whole Point of No Return", which contains the following line
The laws made for and by the rich
Why is the law made for and by the rich?
Why are they rich in the first place?
Because the banking system gives them power to create virtually unlimited quantities of money, to pay greedy and traitors-to-the-human-race lawyers to write up and defend the law.
That threesome is nowhere near the immorality of the top lawyers.
============================================
"The Whole Point of No Return" by The Style Council
The lords and ladies pass a ruling
That sons and girls go hand in land
From good stock and the best breeding
Paid for by the servile class
Who have been told all lie in state
To bow down forth and face their fate
Its so easy.
So, so easy
All righteousness did build thy arrow
To shoot it straight into their lies
Who would expect the mighty sparrow
Could rid our world of all their kind?
Rising up and taking back
The property of every man
Oh its easy.
So, so easy
Rising up to break this thing
From family trees the dukes do swing
Just one blow to scratch the itch
The laws made for and by the rich
It would be easy.
So, so easy.
BOLTON ATTACKS NIE REPORT ON IRAN
The Washington Post has today published an attack by John Bolton on the NIE report on Iran. Bolton produces no evidence whatsoever that Iran has been attempting to produce a nuclear weapon. This correlates with what Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov said yesterday, in that Russia has no evidence that Iran ever followed a nuclear weapons program.
In his WP piece Bolton reminds us that he was Undersecretary of State for Arms Control in 2003. This was when the "coalition of the killing" went into Iraq telling us that Iraq had WMD and that they knew exactly where they were. To date, no such WMD has been found. However, despite telling us that Iraqi oil would be used for the Iraqis, the Iraq Oil Privatisation Law, which will hand control over Iraq's oil to Anglo-Americans, is being passed.
So can we ever believe John Bolton and his moustache again? I seriously doubt it.
I think that a compromise was reached between Cheney and the intelligence community. The year 2003 automatically makes one think that perhaps the invasion of Iraq did make Iran think twice about its nuclear weapon programme.
And there lies the trick, for you then assume that Iran did have a nuclear weapon programme. And if it did, then it could start it up again. So we had better invade etc etc.
But as Lavrov said; what evidence is at all that Iran ever did or does have a nuclear weapon programme?
=============================
From http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/12/05/AR2007120502234.html?hpid=opinionsbox1
The Flaws In the Iran Report
By John R. Bolton
Thursday, December 6, 2007; Page A29
Rarely has a document from the supposedly hidden world of intelligence had such an impact as the National Intelligence Estimate released this week. Rarely has an administration been so unprepared for such an event. And rarely have vehement critics of the "intelligence community" on issues such as Iraq's weapons of mass destruction reversed themselves so quickly.
All this shows that we not only have a problem interpreting what the mullahs in Tehran are up to, but also a more fundamental problem: Too much of the intelligence community is engaging in policy formulation rather than "intelligence" analysis, and too many in Congress and the media are happy about it. President Bush may not be able to repair his Iran policy (which was not rigorous enough to begin with) in his last year, but he would leave a lasting legacy by returning the intelligence world to its proper function.
In his WP piece Bolton reminds us that he was Undersecretary of State for Arms Control in 2003. This was when the "coalition of the killing" went into Iraq telling us that Iraq had WMD and that they knew exactly where they were. To date, no such WMD has been found. However, despite telling us that Iraqi oil would be used for the Iraqis, the Iraq Oil Privatisation Law, which will hand control over Iraq's oil to Anglo-Americans, is being passed.
So can we ever believe John Bolton and his moustache again? I seriously doubt it.
I think that a compromise was reached between Cheney and the intelligence community. The year 2003 automatically makes one think that perhaps the invasion of Iraq did make Iran think twice about its nuclear weapon programme.
And there lies the trick, for you then assume that Iran did have a nuclear weapon programme. And if it did, then it could start it up again. So we had better invade etc etc.
But as Lavrov said; what evidence is at all that Iran ever did or does have a nuclear weapon programme?
=============================
From http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/12/05/AR2007120502234.html?hpid=opinionsbox1
The Flaws In the Iran Report
By John R. Bolton
Thursday, December 6, 2007; Page A29
Rarely has a document from the supposedly hidden world of intelligence had such an impact as the National Intelligence Estimate released this week. Rarely has an administration been so unprepared for such an event. And rarely have vehement critics of the "intelligence community" on issues such as Iraq's weapons of mass destruction reversed themselves so quickly.
All this shows that we not only have a problem interpreting what the mullahs in Tehran are up to, but also a more fundamental problem: Too much of the intelligence community is engaging in policy formulation rather than "intelligence" analysis, and too many in Congress and the media are happy about it. President Bush may not be able to repair his Iran policy (which was not rigorous enough to begin with) in his last year, but he would leave a lasting legacy by returning the intelligence world to its proper function.
Wednesday, December 05, 2007
EDUCATION. EDUCATION. EDUCATION.
That's what that b&"*^%rd Blair said when he moved into No. 10 10 years ago.
But apparently our youth, those who will vote in the next series of governments in the decades to come, have slipped down the world education league tables.
However, do not fear for the sort of people we are bringing up, for they can buy booze which is cheaper than water, then batter a guy to death when he asks them to stop their drunken rowdiness, and then go and play a video game called "kill and torture as many virtual people as you can v. 3.0", and then watch some soft porn on MTV.
Just what sort of psyche will our kids have when they grow up?
================================
From http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=499753&in_page_id=1770
Billions spent on education, but British schools slump in the world league
By LAURA CLARK - More by this author »
Last updated at 23:58pm on 4th December 2007
Britain has nosedived down the world education league despite billions of pounds of extra spending on schools, an international study revealed yesterday.
The findings are the third in a week to highlight falling education standards in a country with a schools budget that has risen to more than £50billion a year.
Our schools now stand at 24th in a table of teenagers' achievement in maths, level with Poland and down from eighth in six years.
But apparently our youth, those who will vote in the next series of governments in the decades to come, have slipped down the world education league tables.
However, do not fear for the sort of people we are bringing up, for they can buy booze which is cheaper than water, then batter a guy to death when he asks them to stop their drunken rowdiness, and then go and play a video game called "kill and torture as many virtual people as you can v. 3.0", and then watch some soft porn on MTV.
Just what sort of psyche will our kids have when they grow up?
================================
From http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=499753&in_page_id=1770
Billions spent on education, but British schools slump in the world league
By LAURA CLARK - More by this author »
Last updated at 23:58pm on 4th December 2007
Britain has nosedived down the world education league despite billions of pounds of extra spending on schools, an international study revealed yesterday.
The findings are the third in a week to highlight falling education standards in a country with a schools budget that has risen to more than £50billion a year.
Our schools now stand at 24th in a table of teenagers' achievement in maths, level with Poland and down from eighth in six years.
Monday, December 03, 2007
THE OTHER RUSSIA
I have posted about Kasparov’s The Other Russia before.
Here are the members of The Other Russia from The National Endowment for Democracy;
Frank Conatser
Nadia Diuk
Carl Gershman
Marc Schliefer
John Squier
Other persons of interest;
Anthony Russell Brenton, Ambassador of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to the Russian Federation
Richard C Holbrooke, Council on Foreign Relations
Michael McFaul, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Dick Morris, Political Adviser
Bruce Jackson, President, Project on Transitional Democracies, and PNAC
The aim of The Project on Transitional Democracies is
"The Project on Transitional Democracies has been organized to exploit the opportunities to accelerate democratic reform and integration which we believe will exist in the broader Euro-Atlantic region over the next decade. The Project is a multi-year endeavor aimed at accelerating the pace of reform in Europe's post-1989 democracies and advancing the date for the integration of these democracies into the institutions of the Euro-Atlantic.”
i.e. the aim of The Project on Transitional Democracies is to assimilate as much as the former Soviet Empire into the NATO/EU sphere as fast as possible. Hence its name.
So when Putin accuses us of interfering in Russian politics is he correct? Christ, Ambassador “Big Mouth” Brenton is a member of The Other Russia!! “Big Mouth” says nothing of the NED/PNAC/CFR influence on The Other Russia.
As long as we have the NWO in Washington and London, we can never play fair. We can never play by the rules, because they don’t. They have proven themselves beyond doubt to be very mentally sick and evil. They engineered, financed and profited sickeningly from WW1 and WW2. They invaded Iraq in 2003 and killed a half million, and at least double that during the 1990’s, just in Iraq alone! This shows they are prepared to do anything to get what they want, and that is total global domination of all of the world’s people and its natural resources.
So when United Russia gets 62% of the vote, implying Putin’s rule for several more years at least, you can bet these NED/PNAC/CFR guys are pissed off. I don’t know whether to believe all or some of the allegations made against the voting procedures in Russia, but I am willing to bet a significant portion are false, and the others are true, if only to protect the Russian people from the NWO!
Who is trying to stop war on Iran?
Who is correctly accusing NATO of mission creep?
Who is correctly accusing BushCheney & Co of preparing another 9/11 or Pearl
Harbour?
Who is correctly accusing BushCheney & Co of installing missiles in Poland that can be easily turned from defence against Iran to offence against Russia?
Who is hated by the people we hate?
Nobody is perfect. Nobody is all things to all men and women. But at the moment, I believe we should consider the following very closely; my enemy’s enemy is my friend.
Of course, I may be wrong. Putin may be one of them, requiring the threat of NATO etc to remain in power to build a bigger police state. But the only concentration camps I hear about are those in the USA built by Wackenhut to be filled with Americans after the very Pearl Harbour event Putin is warning us of.
But if Putin is one of them, why is he accusing BushCheney & Co. of preparing another Pearl Harbour for yet more American-instigated war? And how can he assimilate Russia into NATO after all he has said?
Here are the members of The Other Russia from The National Endowment for Democracy;
Frank Conatser
Nadia Diuk
Carl Gershman
Marc Schliefer
John Squier
Other persons of interest;
Anthony Russell Brenton, Ambassador of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to the Russian Federation
Richard C Holbrooke, Council on Foreign Relations
Michael McFaul, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Dick Morris, Political Adviser
Bruce Jackson, President, Project on Transitional Democracies, and PNAC
The aim of The Project on Transitional Democracies is
"The Project on Transitional Democracies has been organized to exploit the opportunities to accelerate democratic reform and integration which we believe will exist in the broader Euro-Atlantic region over the next decade. The Project is a multi-year endeavor aimed at accelerating the pace of reform in Europe's post-1989 democracies and advancing the date for the integration of these democracies into the institutions of the Euro-Atlantic.”
i.e. the aim of The Project on Transitional Democracies is to assimilate as much as the former Soviet Empire into the NATO/EU sphere as fast as possible. Hence its name.
So when Putin accuses us of interfering in Russian politics is he correct? Christ, Ambassador “Big Mouth” Brenton is a member of The Other Russia!! “Big Mouth” says nothing of the NED/PNAC/CFR influence on The Other Russia.
As long as we have the NWO in Washington and London, we can never play fair. We can never play by the rules, because they don’t. They have proven themselves beyond doubt to be very mentally sick and evil. They engineered, financed and profited sickeningly from WW1 and WW2. They invaded Iraq in 2003 and killed a half million, and at least double that during the 1990’s, just in Iraq alone! This shows they are prepared to do anything to get what they want, and that is total global domination of all of the world’s people and its natural resources.
So when United Russia gets 62% of the vote, implying Putin’s rule for several more years at least, you can bet these NED/PNAC/CFR guys are pissed off. I don’t know whether to believe all or some of the allegations made against the voting procedures in Russia, but I am willing to bet a significant portion are false, and the others are true, if only to protect the Russian people from the NWO!
Who is trying to stop war on Iran?
Who is correctly accusing NATO of mission creep?
Who is correctly accusing BushCheney & Co of preparing another 9/11 or Pearl
Harbour?
Who is correctly accusing BushCheney & Co of installing missiles in Poland that can be easily turned from defence against Iran to offence against Russia?
Who is hated by the people we hate?
Nobody is perfect. Nobody is all things to all men and women. But at the moment, I believe we should consider the following very closely; my enemy’s enemy is my friend.
Of course, I may be wrong. Putin may be one of them, requiring the threat of NATO etc to remain in power to build a bigger police state. But the only concentration camps I hear about are those in the USA built by Wackenhut to be filled with Americans after the very Pearl Harbour event Putin is warning us of.
But if Putin is one of them, why is he accusing BushCheney & Co. of preparing another Pearl Harbour for yet more American-instigated war? And how can he assimilate Russia into NATO after all he has said?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)