WHAT IS KISSINGER RANTING ON ABOUT NOW?

Dr Henry 'Strangelove' Kissinger has been given the opportunity to rant in The Washington Post today. His rant entitled "The Next Steps With Iran" tries to paint Iran as a backward country which needs bringing frm the dark ages into the modern world.

There is however no mention of why, despite sitting on a huge lake of oil and gas, Iran needs to be 'modernized'.

That whole area, consisting of Iran, Iraq, Syria, Saudia Arabia, Egypt and Palestine, is a sordid tale of Anglo-American interference and manipulation. New nations were created and new borders drawn by the West. Rulers were imposed, and were overthrown and replaced by new ones allied to the West if they didn't do as the Anglo-Americans wanted, particularly in Iran. Dr Mohammad Mossadegh nationalized the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company (AIOC) to use the profits for Iran. So what did the Anglo-Americans do? Overthrew and replaced him, and with the aid of Mossad then created the brutal SAVAK to prevent any counter-revolution. AIOC became British Petroleum in 1954. Mossadegh was voted "The Iranian of the Century" in 2000 by readers of The Iranian for his stand against the Anglo-American Oil companies.

Kissinger, like a number of Neocons, is foaming at the mouth, begging for a confrontation with Iran. There is even ANOTHER comment entitled "Iran's nuclear threat must be faced" in The Daily Telegraph calling for war on Iran.

But Does Kissinger want the Iranian sand, or the Iranian oil?

Or is there a deeper motive?

WHAT IS IT ABOUT GAGHAN, SODERBERGH AND CLOONEY?

Three Kings - [Clooney] Clooney is one of several US Army soldiers who steal a treasure of gold in Iraq during Gulf War I. Released in 1999.

Traffic - [Gaghan and Soderbergh] Traffic ran away with the Oscars in 2001, and contained two scenes in which several boxes in the foreground were stamped with "9/11"

Syriana - [Clooney, Gaghan and Soderbergh] in a post earlier this year I speculated that Syria was next in line, not Iran. Syriana follows the story of Bob, played by Clooney, who had been in Beirut during the '80s and had infiltrated Hizb Allah, who is sent back to Beirut to kidnap one of two sons of a dying emir who is next in line to inherit a kingdom of oil, and who is not corruptible and willing to play the US stooge. Bob is instead kidnapped by Hizb Allah, and tortured, and eventually killed by a missile fired by the US aimed to kill the emir's son he had initially been sent to kidnap. The story in Syriana was inspired by See No Evil by CIA agent Robert Baer.

Clooney also starred in the 1993 TV Movie Without Warning: Terror in the Towers based on the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Centre (which was known of by the FBI).

Probably just a coincidence.

BIN LADEN CITED 1996 ISRAELI ATTACK ON QANA IN HIS FIRST FATWA

Scouring blogger for news on the recent mass murder at Qana I have been directed to the first fatwa issued by Osama bin Laden against the USA. This was issued 23rd August 1996 in the London-based Al Quds Al Arabi and was entitled "Declaration of War against the Americans Occupying the Land of the Two Holy Places."

From http://www.pbs.org/newshour/terrorism/international/fatwa_1996.html

Allah's blessing and salutations on His slave and messenger who said: " The people are close to an all encompassing punishment from Allah if they see the oppressor and fail to restrain him." It should not be hidden from you that the people of Islam had suffered from aggression, iniquity and injustice imposed on them by the ZionistCrusaders alliance and their collaborators to the extent that the Muslims blood became the cheapest and their wealth as loot in the hands of the enemies. Their blood was spilled in Palestine and Iraq. The horrifying pictures of the massacre of Qana, in Lebanon are still fresh in our memory. Massacres in Tajakestan, Burma, Cashmere, Assam, Philippine, Fatani, Ogadin, Somalia, Erithria, Chechnia and in BosniaHerzegovina took place, massacres that send shivers in the body and shake the conscience. All of this and the world watch and hear, and not only didn't respond to these atrocities, but also with a clear conspiracy between the USA and its' allies and under the cover of the iniquitous United Nations, the dispossessed people were even prevented from obtaining arms to defend themselves.

In early 1996 Israel had bombed the region around Qana in Operation Grapes of Wrath, resulting in Lebanese civilians seeking refuge in a UN camp. But as we have seen Israel has no respect for the UN and Israel destroyed the UN camp, killing 102 men, women and children. Robert Fisk wrote in The Independent,

It was a massacre. Not since Sabra and Chatila had I seen the innocent slaughtered like this. The Lebanese refugee women and children and men lay in heaps, their hands or arms or legs missing, beheaded or disemboweled. There were well over a hundred of them. A baby lay without a head. The Israeli shells had scythed through them as they lay in the United Nations shelter, believing that they were safe under the world's protection. Like the Muslims of Srebrenica, the Muslims of Qana were wrong.

Similar descriptions are now being used today.

One has to ask; Is Israel trying to provoke al-Qaeda?

CAN ISRAEL NOW IGNORE ANY UN RESOLUTION ON IMMEDIATE CEASEFIRE?

Haaretz is reporting that yesterday France distributed a draft resolution to all fifteen members of the Security Council calling for an immediate ceasefire and the deployment of an international peacekeeping force. If this is passed can Israel ignore it, considering it is citing UNSC Resolution 1559 to defend its actions?

And if it does ignore it, what then?

From http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/744083.html

France presents UN draft resolution calling for immediate ceasefire

France has drawn up a draft UN Security Council resolution that would call for an immediate cessation of hostilities in Israel and Lebanon and prepare for the deployment of an international force.

The document, distributed to the 15 Security Council members on Saturday, anticipates a draft resolution the United States is planning that would place up to 20,000 peacekeepers along Lebanon's borders with Israel and with Syria.

On Monday, UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan will preside over a meeting of possible troop contributors to such a force, which would include the 25-member European Union, which has expressed interest, as well as Turkey and nations now contributing to a UN peacekeeping force in Lebanon.

Chirac, whose country has emerged as the potential leader of the force, has said troops could not be sent until there was a cease-fire accompanied by a political deal.

In many respects, the French draft is similar to proposals the United States and Annan have been discussing, except that it calls for an immediate end to the fighting. The United States alone has refused to back such calls, arguing that conditions first had to be ripe for a sustainable cease-fire.

BUSH TELLS SOME TRUTH BUT BLAIR TRIES TO CORRECT BUSH

At the press conference yesterday President George W Bush appeared to accept that the foreign policy of the USA played some part in the motivation for the synthetic terror attack we know as 9/11.

From http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/07/20060728-1.html

PRESIDENT BUSH: David Gregory.

Q Thank you. Mr. President, both of you, I'd like to ask you about the big picture that you're discussing. Mr. President, three years ago, you argued that an invasion of Iraq would create a new stage of Arab-Israeli peace. And yet today, there is an Iraqi Prime Minister who has been sharply critical of Israel. Arab governments, despite your arguments, who have criticized Hezbollah, have now changed their tune. Now they're sharply critical of Israel. And despite from both of you, warnings to Syria and Iran to back off support from Hezbollah, effectively, Mr. President, your words are being ignored. So what has happened to America's clout in this region that you've committed yourself to transform?

PRESIDENT BUSH: David, it's an interesting period because instead of having foreign policies based upon trying to create a sense of stability, we have a foreign policy that addresses the root causes of violence and instability.

For a while, American foreign policy was just, let's hope everything is calm, kind of managed calm. But beneath the surface brewed a lot of resentment and anger that was manifested in its -- on September the 11th.

But then Blair, not unexpectedly, continued his rallying cries for war just as he did earlier this year in three speeches he gave around the world, and tried to make out that this was not the case and that actually this terrorism has been going on for years and intends to destroy us so we must therefore confront it and destroy it (no mention whatsoever of Londonistan) and that 9/11 was what they wanted to do anyway.

PRIME MINISTER BLAIR: I don't think, actually, it's anything to do with a loss of American influence at all. I think -- we've got to go back and ask what changed policy, because policy has changed in the past few years. And what changed policy was September the 11th. That changed policy, but actually, before September the 11th this global movement with a global ideology was already in being. September the 11th was the culmination of what they wanted to do. But, actually -- and this is probably where the policymakers, such as myself, were truly in error -- is that even before September the 11th, this was happening in all sorts of different ways in different countries.

I mean, in Algeria, for example, tens and tens of thousands of people lost their lives. This movement has grown, it is there, it will latch on to any cause that it possibly can and give it a dimension of terrorism and hatred. You can see this. You can see it in Kashmir, for example. You can see it in Chechnya. You can see it in Palestine.

Now, what is its purpose? Its purpose is to promote its ideology based upon the perversion of Islam, and to use any methods at all, but particularly terrorism, to do that, because they know that the value of terrorism to them is -- as I was saying a moment or two ago, it's not simply the act of terror, it's the chain reaction that terror brings with it. Terrorism brings the reprisal; the reprisal brings the additional hatred; the additional hatred breeds the additional terrorism, and so on. But in a small way, we lived through that in Northern Ireland over many, many decades.

Now, what happened after September the 11th -- and this explains, I think, the President's policy, but also the reason why I have taken the view, and still take the view that Britain and America should remain strong allies, shoulder-to-shoulder in fighting this battle, is that we are never going to succeed unless we understand they are going to fight hard. The reason why they are doing what they're doing in Iraq at the moment -- and, yes, it's really tough as a result of it -- is because they know that if, right in the center of the Middle East, in an Arab, Muslim country, you've got a non-sectarian democracy, in other words people weren't governed either by religious fanatics or secular dictators, you've got a genuine democracy of the people, how does their ideology flourish in such circumstances?

So they have imported the terrorism into that country, preyed on whatever reactionary elements there are to boost it. And that's why we have the issue there; that's why the Taliban are trying to come back in Afghanistan. That is why, the moment it looked as if you could get progress in Israel and Palestine, it had to be stopped. That's the moment when, as they saw there was a problem in Gaza, so they realized, well, there's a possibility now we can set Lebanon against Israel.

Now, it's a global movement, it's a global ideology. And if there's any mistake that's ever made in these circumstances, it's if people are surprised that it's tough to fight, because you're up against an ideology that's prepared to use any means at all, including killing any number of wholly innocent people.

And I don't dispute part of the implication of your question at all, in the sense that you look at what is happening in the Middle East and what is happening in Iraq and Lebanon and Palestine, and, of course, there's a sense of shock and frustration and anger at what is happening, and grief at the loss of innocent lives. But it is not a reason for walking away. It's a reason for staying the course, and staying it no matter how tough it is, because the alternative is actually letting this ideology grip a larger and larger number of people.

And it is going to be difficult. Look, we've got a problem even in our own Muslim communities in Europe, who will half-buy into some of the propaganda that's pushed at it -- the purpose of America is to suppress Islam, Britain has joined with America in the suppression of Islam. And one of the things we've got to stop doing is stop apologizing for our own positions. Muslims in America, as far as I'm aware of, are free to worship; Muslims in Britain are free to worship. We are plural societies.

It's nonsense, the propaganda is nonsense. And we're not going to defeat this ideology until we in the West go out with sufficient confidence in our own position and say, this is wrong. It's not just wrong in its methods, it's wrong in its ideas, it's wrong in its ideology, it's wrong in every single wretched reactionary thing about it. And it will be a long struggle, I'm afraid. But there's no alternative but to stay the course with it. And we will.

The odd thing is that Blair recognised the spiral of violence.

Now, what is its purpose? Its purpose is to promote its ideology based upon the perversion of Islam, and to use any methods at all, but particularly terrorism, to do that, because they know that the value of terrorism to them is -- as I was saying a moment or two ago, it's not simply the act of terror, it's the chain reaction that terror brings with it. Terrorism brings the reprisal ; the reprisal brings the additional hatred; the additional hatred breeds the additional terrorism, and so on.

So instead of just riding it out, not changing our society (or "giving into the terrorists") and understanding EXACTLY where this terrorism came from (clue: MI6), Blair wants to join in the spiral of increasing violence and turn our society into a Police State!!

THE PROPHECY OF THREE WORLD WARS

On 15th August 1871 the Freemasonic Grand Commander Albert Pike wrote to the Freemasonic British Agent Giuseppe Mazzini, setting out the plan for three world wars which would end with the rule of Lucifer (Pike was quite fond of using the word Lucifer). There has been some questioning of the authenticity of this letter, for it uses words such as Nazism before the Nazis had been created. However this letter is published in full in a book by Domenico Margiotta called Le Palladisme: Culte de Satan-Lucifer (‘Palladism: Cult of Satan-Lucifer’), which was published in 1895!!

It is quite remarkable that the prophecies set out in the letter regarding WW1 and WW2 have come true. The prophecy of the location of the third world war is the Middle East between Zionism and Islam (which would explain why Israel is sustained by the Federal Reserve).

Either the letter is a forgery, in which case the letter is perhaps the most incredible prediction. Or the letter is true. Pike and Mazzini were 'operations managers' of the New World Order and would have had the organizations under their control to make the prophecies come true. Mazzini and Pike would have been replaced upon their deaths, so their successors in the occult underground e.g. Thule Society, would have had the authority to create Nazism and turn the prophecy into reality.

Below are the purposes of the world wars as set out in the letter.

"The First World War must be brought about in order to permit the Illuminati to overthrow the power of the Czars in Russia and of making that country a fortress of atheistic Communism. The divergences caused by the "agentur" (agents) of the Illuminati between the British and Germanic Empires will be used to foment this war. At the end of the war, Communism will be built and used in order to destroy the other governments and in order to weaken the religions."

"The Second World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences between the Fascists and the political Zionists. This war must be brought about so that Nazism is destroyed and that the political Zionism be strong enough to institute a sovereign state of Israel in Palestine. During the Second World War, International Communism must become strong enough in order to balance Christendom, which would be then restrained and held in check until the time when we would need it for the final social cataclysm."

"The Third World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences caused by the "agentur" of the "Illuminati" between the political Zionists and the leaders of Islamic World. The war must be conducted in such a way that Islam (the Moslem Arabic World) and political Zionism (the State of Israel) mutually destroy each other. Meanwhile the other nations, once more divided on this issue will be constrained to fight to the point of complete physical, moral, spiritual and economical exhaustion…We shall unleash the Nihilists and the atheists, and we shall provoke a formidable social cataclysm which in all its horror will show clearly to the nations the effect of absolute atheism, origin of savagery and of the most bloody turmoil. Then everywhere, the citizens, obliged to defend themselves against the world minority of revolutionaries, will exterminate those destroyers of civilization, and the multitude, disillusioned with Christianity, whose deistic spirits will from that moment be without compass or direction, anxious for an ideal, but without knowing where to render its adoration, will receive the true light through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer, brought finally out in the public view. This manifestation will result from the general reactionary movement which will follow the destruction of Christianity and atheism, both conquered and exterminated at the same time."

Basically, Israel has been sustained by the Federal Reserve to cause the friction for World War Three, and once Israel is no longer needed that finance will disappear leaving Israel pissing into a head wind, with Islamic armies invading and destroying it.

NEOCON PAPER PUSHES AN AL-QAEDA/911/HIZB ALLAH CONNECTION

The publication run by William Kristol, The Weekly Standard, had published an article by Thomas Joscelyn entitled Bin Laden's "Brothers" . Joscelyn argues that although al-Qaeda is Sunni and Hizb Allah is Shia and that therefore the two cannot work together, actually there is, and has been, a working relationship between the two. Joscelyn also points out that the piece of bollocks we know as the 9/11 Commission Report left open the possibility that Hizb Allah played a significant part in the 9/11 attacks, a possibility which deserves more investigation!!

The last three paragraphs of the report read

The testimony provided by Ali Mohamed and Jamal al Fadl was corroborated by the 9/11 Commission. The Commission's final report confirms that al Qaeda operatives received training from Hezbollah in Lebanon in addition to other training provided in Iran. The Commission also left open the possibility that al Qaeda and Hezbollah worked together on the 1996 Khobar Towers bombing.

Remarkably, the Commission even left the door open for further investigation into the September 11 attacks. It cited evidence that senior Hezbollah operatives monitored the travels of eight to ten of the "muscle" hijackers prior to the attack. Such provocative threads of evidence led the Commission to report, "We believe this topic requires further investigation by the U.S. government."

Some analysts will continue to dismiss Zawahiri's remarks because they do not conform to the prevailing model for understanding terrorism. But the truth is that there is a long history of collaboration between al Qaeda and Hezbollah.

What this does is link al-Qaeda and Hizb Allah in the confused American mind, perhaps even preparing America for the US military to be sucked into the 'war' on Lebanon and The Gaza Strip.

ps for a complete and controlled demolition of the 9/11 Commission Report see The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions by Dr David Ray Griffin.

WHO CONTROLS THE PRESIDENT OF THE USA?

Last week Bush told Israel he would give them one week to sort Hizb Allah out. That week is now up, and Hizb Allah is holding out. Now the Israeli Major General Udi Adam says he believes the offensive will last a few more weeks, and not a peep out of Bush. Now al-Qaeda No. 2 Ayman al-Zawahiri has appeared on al-Jazeera and is quoted as saying that

"The al Qaeda organization will not stay silent regarding what the Muslims in Palestine and Lebanon are facing...these (Israeli) shells burn our brothers...all the world as a battlefield open in front of us."

So has Israel, or whoever controls Israel, told Bush to let it all blow up? Oh yes. A few more weeks of Israel bombing Lebanon will invite a few terrorist attacks, and then Cheney can implement his nuclear first strike on Iran, wether Iran was involved or not.

So, who does control the President of the USA? See the inverted, irregular and incomplete pentagram to the North of The White(black) House!

YEP! HERE WE GO! IRANIAN VOLUNTEERS TO JOIN HIZB ALLAH VIA SYRIA

The neocons will be rubbing their hands with glee at this.

From http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/07/26/iran.volunteers.ap/index.html

Iranians volunteer to fight Israel
Group heads for 'holy war' in Lebanon

Wednesday, July 26, 2006; Posted: 4:56 p.m. EDT (20:56 GMT)


TEHRAN, Iran (AP) -- Surrounded by yellow Hezbollah flags, more than 60 Iranian volunteers set off Wednesday to join what they called a holy war against Israeli forces in Lebanon.

The group -- ranging from teenagers to grandfathers -- plans to join about 200 other volunteers on the way to the Turkish border, which they hope to cross Thursday. They plan to reach Lebanon via Syria on the weekend.

Organizers said the volunteers are carrying no weapons, and it was not clear whether Turkey would allow them to pass.

...Iran says it will not send regular forces to aid Hezbollah, but apparently it will not attempt to stop volunteer guerrillas.

A TIMELINE OF ZIONIST TERROR 1944 - 1948

Following the assassination of UN representative Count Folke-Bernadotte by the Stern gang the UN prepared a report on Zionist terror during the four years previous to the assassination. The timeline can be found at http://www.doublestandards.org/unbunche.html .

How can anyone accuse Israel of being built on terror by terrorists?

1944

1

November 6, 1944, Cairo. Lord Moyne, British Resident Minister in the Middle East, and his driver were assassinated outside the minister's Cairo residence. Two murderers were involved. One was injured, and both were immediately arrested.

1945

2

January 10, 1945, Cairo. The British supreme military court today put on trial Eliahu Bet-Tsours from Tel Aviv and Eliahu Hakim of Haifa, both admitted members of the Jewish terrorist Stern gang.

3

January 18, 1945, Cairo. The British supreme military court sentenced the murderers of Lord Moyne to death. Both killers admitted their act and also admitted their membership in the Stem gang which they said ordered the killings as a warning to the British not to interfere with future Jewish immigration to Jerusalem.

4

March 22, 1945, Cairo. The two convicted Jewish Stern gang terrorists who murdered Lord Moyne and his driver were hanged today in the Cairo prison British authorities announced.

1946

5

January 12, 1946, Palestine. A train was derailed by Jewish terrorists at Hadera near Haifa by a bomb and robbed of £35,000 in cash. Two British police officials were injured.

...

258

May 22, 1948, Jerusalem. Thomas Wasson, US. Consul General in Jerusalem and a member of the Council's Truce Commission, was fatally wounded by a Stern gang sniper near the US. Consulate. Two other Consulate members were also assaulted, one dying the next day.

259

September 17, 1948, Jerusalem. Angered by his order to readmit 8,000 Arab refugees driven from three villages near Haifa by attacks of Jewish terrorists, the Stern gang assassinated Count Folke Bernadotte, UN mediator for Palestine. Also killed in the attack was French Col. Andre Serot, chief of France's 100-man contingent in the unarmed UN truce-observer team.

And on and on it goes...

ISRAEL TAKES THE LIMEADE

Israel said it would clear South Lebanon of Hizb Allah and hold it until a multinational force could be organized to take control. But then it 'accidentally' bombs a UN observation post and the patrol sent to rescue survivors!

The bombing of the observation post was designed to stop nations organizing a multinational force to police South Lebanon. Thus Israel can occupy South Lebanon and always has the excuse that a multinational force to police South Lebanon is not available.

RICE : "IT'S TIME FOR A NEW MIDDLE EAST"

Well, well, well.

Condi Rice said today

"It is time for a new Middle East, it is time to say to those who do not want a different kind of Middle East that we will prevail, they will not."

THE UNITED STATES COMMITTEE FOR A FREE LEBANON

This is a 'committee' made up of Lebanese and Americans whose goal is to get Syria out of Lebanon. Some of the 'Golden Circle' who run the USCFL are also members of the Project for a New American Century. On 18th March 2002 the USCFL wrote an open letter to Bush, Powell and Rice, congratulating them on their approach to the Middle East. The letter is available to read online at http://www.freelebanon.org/actions/default.htm . The section directed at Rice, who was then National Security Advisor but is now Secretary of State, reads thus;

Honorable Condoleeza Rice:

We applaud you for your firm stand regarding Hizballah and strongly share your point of view regarding the latter.

Hizballah is in fact a well financed, organized and led terrorist group. It seems it has written the book on how to be a terrorist network for other terror networks throughout the world. This is partly due to the fact that it has risen to such a prominent stature being backed by two major national governments Iran and Syria, and is now part of the current Lebanese government that is making regional and national policy.

Having stated the obvious, we urge you to do everything in your power to put an end to Hizballah's military infrastructure in Lebanon.

Please do not count on the Lebanese government to give you any helping hand in the process. We all know that Lebanon today maybe the only nation in the world that is totally occupied, its government a tool in the hands of the Syrian intelligence services, its parliament appointed and not elected, its legal system festering with bribery and corruption, its democracy ceding to autocracy, its economy in debt and beyond all means of repayment and the majority of its population living on the verge of poverty.

Time has never been more appropriate however, to rescue the Lebanese government from Hizballah, the Syrian military and intelligence infrastructure and help restoring what was the "Paris of the Middle East". Lebanese people have much to offer to America and the West once they are in full control of their destiny.

All this may sound idealistic, given the American turn inward; and that during the past twenty five years, three states (France, the United States, and Israel) have tried to stand up to Syrian rule in Lebanon, and all three failed. But Syria now lacks a real patron, American influence is stronger than ever, and economic dynamics are growing in importance. By taking a firm stand on this small but crucial issue, the U.S government could well get a process started that eventually leads to the resurrection of an independent Lebanon, with benefits for that country, the region, and for the United States itself.

Some of the signatories of that letter also signed the PNAC letter to Bush dated 20th September 2001 suggesting that Hizb Allah was the key to get at Syria and Iran. Among them are Richard 'Prince of Darkness' Perle and Frank Gaffney. Perle, now a Fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, recently wrote an article available at http://www.aei.org/publications/filter.all,pubID.24691/pub_detail.asp entitled Why Did Bush Blink on Iran? (Ask Condi) which questioned why Bush and Rice caved into the doves on Iran's nuclear ambitions.

But still, here is a letter from two core members of PNAC asking Rice to "do everything in your power to put an end to Hizballah's military infrastructure in Lebanon". Is this why Rice is reluctant to call for an immediate ceasefire?

HOW TO WIN FRIENDS AND INFLUENCE PEOPLE

or, WHY IS ISRAEL SO GOOD AT CREATING REFUGEES?

Israel is not quite a home of refugees, but there were a substantial number of Jewish refugees who settled there after WW2 (after the Zionists used the holocaust that they could have thwarted as emotional blackmail). With this history you could be expecting Israel to be the most compassionate country on Earth, having suffered so horrifically. Instead it seems to have a God-given talent for creating millions of refugees, driving an indigenous population from their homes, their farms, their villages, their towns, their cities, and bombing neighbouring nations into a 3rd world state (ps I wonder who gets the contracts to rebuild Lebanon, or will Lebanon be left to become the new Gaza strip?).

Israel is the homeland for the Jewish people 'because God says so'. Abraham, or so he said, was told by God that Israel belonged to him and all who followed him. So if I then say that actually God told me this morning that Israel now belongs to me because the current Zionist occupiers are a bunch of brutal, racist thugs and are a curse and bring shame upon their religion, what then?

Do you win friends by bombing your neighbours?

Do you influence people by driving them from their homes?

Er, no!

But this was why Zionism was selected as the tool for WW3. The British sold out the Arabs after promising Palestine to both of them. The Arabs drove the Turks out, expecting their independence, but they got the Zionist ubermenschen instead driving them into the sea! Allowing the existence of, and sustaining, the Zionist State of Israel was bound to cause a massive amount of anger in the Middle East, and with migration, around the world. Hence, international Islamic terrorism. The Israeli Jews born and raised in Israel have grown up in a nation filled with hate and fear, and they know nothing else. What are they taught at school? About their history? The state of the Palestinians? Do they have a solution to "The Palestinian Question"? The decendents of the displaced Palestininans have also grown up knowing nothing but fear and hate, except they live in poverty, while Israel is sustained by the Federal Reserve (controlled by the Rothschilds who financed the early Jewish settlements).

It will take an Israeli man or woman of great wisdom, understanding and compassion to sort the Israeli/Palestine conflict from the Israeli side. I think Israel holds its destiny in its hands. It has an awesome death machine, which if it does not learn to control and use as a last resort could easily lead to its destruction.

SUNDAY TELEGRAPH LEADER URGES STRIKE ON IRAN

Well, it's becoming crystal clear that this Hizb Allah v Israel conflict is being used as an excuse to get to Iran. This was set out in the 20th September 2001 letter from the warmongering PNAC to the gimp in The White House.

Now The Sunday Telegraph, which was owned by Bilderberg Conrad Black's Hollinger with Kissinger on the board, is now joining in the calls to strike at Iran.

From http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2006/07/23/dl2301.xml&sSheet=/opinion/2006/07/23/ixopinion.html

The Iranian Hydra has many heads. The ayatollahs sponsor militias and political movements across the Muslim world and beyond. Hezbollah is, in reality, the Lebanese branch of the Islamic Revolution. Lop off that head and another will grow in its place. It is in Teheran that the monster's heart beats.

Israel is right to want to degrade its enemies' infrastructure. A return to the status quo ante would mean a return to constant, low-level war - something which is in no one's interest. Israel wants not only to lop off the Hydra's head but to cauterise the wound; that is, to push the terrorists out of range of its cities.

This aim is understandable and laudable. But, as long as Iran goes unchecked, defeating Hezbollah can only ever mean a temporary truce.

...The policy of appeasement has failed; it is time to try coercion.

This does not necessarily mean the direct use of military force: there are many intermediate steps, including targeted sanctions, the seizure of assets and the sponsoring of opposition movements. But leaving Teheran unmolested will mean more Hezbollahs, more terrorism and, ultimately, more wars.

So basically what this suggests is, let's have a war to stop another war.

There is no attempt to question the right of Israel to exist, the way Israel terrorized the Palestinians into fleeing to the West Bank and Gaza Strip, the expansion of the Jewish settlements in Israel, from a handful of villages supported by the Rothschilds to the war machine it is now, and the torture and imprisonment without charge or trial of Palestinians. No question of all this, which is the source of resentment and anger. Everyone and their goldfish knows it.

No, instead we have warmongers in their luxurious appartments and mansions 'playing' at war, manipulating the friction that Israel was built to create.

BBC REPORT

I have just heard a report on the BBC Radio 5 Live.

The report is paraphrased thus: Two Israelis have been killed by Hizb Allah rockets falling on Haifa. This follows Israeli air strikes on Beirut and Sidon.

Q1: why was the attack on Israel the headline and mentioned first, and not the Israeli attack on Lebanon which happened first chronologically?
Q2: why were the deaths of two Israelis reported, while there was no mention whatsoever of the result of the Israeli air strikes?

And to add to the report the BBC went live to Haifa where the reporter commented on the feeling of playing Russian Roulette by living in Haifa. Why not live to Lebanon amongst the rubble and rotting corpses being eaten by dogs and the half a million terrified refugees?

Who is in control of this subtle bias in reporting?

??

So there was a fifth bomber!

From http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2087-2281619,00.html

The alleged fifth terrorist — who has been named to The Sunday Times — is in his thirties and, like three of the bombers, is British-born with Pakistani parents. He is known to Scotland Yard’s 7/7 team, based in Bradford, but has not been interviewed by them.

??

A LIST OF REPORTS INDICATING THE ISRAELI SOLDIERS WERE KIDNAPPED IN LEBANON AND NOT ISRAEL

Here is a link to a page which contains a list of reports indicating that the two Israeli soldiers, who Israel say they are trying to rescue, were kidnapped while they were on Lebanese soil. Israeli sources say that Hizb Allah had attacked a patrol with a rocket, and then kidnapped the two survivors by crossing the border into Israel.

From http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/israeli_solders.html

The Lebanese Shiite Hezbollah movement announced on Wednesday that its guerrillas have captured two Israeli soldiers in southern Lebanon. "Implementing our promise to free Arab prisoners in Israeli jails, our strugglers have captured two Israeli soldiers in southern Lebanon," a statement by Hezbollah said. "The two soldiers have already been moved to a safe place," it added. The Lebanese police said that the two soldiers were captured as they "infiltrated" into the town of Aitaa al-Chaab inside the Lebanese border. [Hindustan Times 7/12/06]

The Lebanese Hezbollah movement announced Wednesday the arrest of two Israeli soldiers in southern Lebanon. Lebanese police said that the two soldiers were arrested as they entered the town of Aitaa al-Chaab inside the Lebanese border. Israeli aircraft were active in the air over southern Lebanon, police said, with jets bombing roads leading to the market town of Nabatiyeh, 60 kilometers south of Beirut. [Bahrain News Agency 7/12/06]

If these are true then along with the spies being told to identify targets it could be argued that Israel provoked the current conflict by sending that patrol into Lebanon, possibly hoping the soldiers would be kidnapped (the aim of Hizb Allah is to gain the release of prisoners through prisoner exchanges).

ISRAELI SPY NETWORK IN LEBANON TOLD TO IDENTIFY TARGETS BEFORE THE KIDNAP

A report on LebanonWire reveals some very interesting information which indicates that Israel was preparing for strikes on Lebanon FOUR DAYS before the incident on the Lebanon/Israeli border in which two Israeli soldiers, now forgotten, were kidnapped.

Readers will be aware of my doubts about the exact location of the kidnapping. Israeli sources say Hizb Allah had infiltrated the Blue Line and had actually crossed the border into Israel to attack a patrol. Other sources say it was t'other way around, that Israel crossed into Lebanon.

This LebanonWire article reports that an Israeli spy network in Lebanon has been busted, and that this network has been upto some pretty tricky stuff.

The report is at http://www.lebanonwire.com/0607MLN/06072220LR.asp , and the last paragraph of this report reads thus;

The unnamed Lebanese official revealed that Israel alerted its "silent cells" in Lebanon four days prior to the kidnapping of two Jewish soldiers by the Party of God, and gave them instructions and information about targeting Hizbullah targets in all Lebanese territory, specifically in Dahieh.

LEBANESE ARMY TO DEFEND LEBANON AGAINST ISRAELI INVASION

From http://www.guardian.co.uk/syria/story/0,,1825918,00.html

"It's possible that in the coming days our ground operations will increase," Brigadier General Alon Friedman told the Maariv newspaper. "We have many forces, we will carry out a massive recruitment of reserves and it's possible that many more forces ... will reach the border in the next few days."

The Lebanese defence minister said Lebanon's army was ready to defend the country against any land invasion by Israel. Elias al-Murr, when asked if the Lebanese army would fight alongside Hizbullah against any land incursion by Israel, told al-Arabiya: "Our constitutional duty is to defend Lebanon as a Lebanese army. This is our role."

How quickly this has escalated. All Israel need do is release some of the women and children they have detained without charge or trial in exchange for the two soldiers. But no, they want to invade Lebanon, AGAIN! And kill, kill, kill, AGAIN!

WHAT DID I SUGGEST TO THE ISC AFTER 7/7?

Last year shortly after the 7/7 bombings in London I wrote to the Intelligence and Security Committee highlighting several discrepancies as well as the 'coincidence' of the simulations of terrorist attacks. I also included this paragraph;

There is a theory that the London bombings were part of an Israeli attempt to gain support for the war on terror, and that the war on terror is in itself part of a much wider agenda to drive towards a world war for global control by the Anglo-American-Israeli Establishment. This apparent foreknowledge of certain Israeli officials (Mossad, Halevi) could indicate some support for this thesis. In the days following the bombings certain Israeli statesmen did use the London bombings to call for action and support for the war on terror. The current withdrawal of Jewish settlers from the Gaza Strip would also indicate that Israel is about to launch a blitzkrieg on the Gaza Strip. This in turn will escalate. Were the attacks on 7th July designed to at the very least silence the protestations as Israel kills thousands of women and children in the Gaza Strip?

We have yet to see if "Israel kills thousands of women and children in the Gaza Strip", but hundreds are dying now in Gaza. The deaths in the order of thousands looks like it will be in Lebanon. However I also suggested that the action in Gaza would escalate, and it has, into Lebanon. There is an argument that the current series of events began when Israel killed a family on a Gaza beach with a shell from a ship of the Israeli Navy. The real beginning of this series of events started in 1947, and arguably in 1897 in Basel at the First Zionist Congress.

But why is Blair so reluctant to criticize the indiscriminate murder of Lebanese children? Was my suggestion correct that 7/7 was designed to silence criticism of Israel from Blair and the British government of any subsequent action by Israel on its neighbours? The mass death in Lebanon came very, very quickly. The aim of Israel very, very quickly switched from the rescue of kidnapped soldiers to the laying waste to Lebanon, almost as if it was a plan ready for execution. Does Israel not realise that they may have actually killed those two soldiers themselves, with their 'precision' bombing destroying houses, villages, blocks of flats, etc?

DOGS EAT DEAD LEBANESE IN THE STREETS

The Red Cross are reporting that dogs are eating the bodies of Lebanese civilians in the streets.

From http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,3-2278300,00.html

The Red Cross told me that they went out there today to try to pick up the bodies and the dogs had started eating them.

The same report states that Israel is dropping leaflets on villages in South Lebanon, even sending SMS messages by text, telling them to leave. However, due to Israeli 'precision' bombing, the roads have been turned into a series of craters and are impassable. So how are the villagers supposed to leave? The destruction of the roads means that aid agencies can't send in medical aid and recover the wounded and the dead, who are therefore being left to their fate in the baking sun. Food cannot be sent in either.

Meanwhile, Israel is still going into refugee camps in Gaza and indiscriminately slaughtering Palestinian children.

What are Israeli kids taught at school about their history? I cannot believe they know the bloody, terror-filled truth.

There has to be more to this action than the destruction of Hizbullah. I still anticipate some sort of action, either kidnap or murder, of American citizens, which is blamed on Hizbullah and will supply the pretext for war on Syria and/or Iran.

BUSH GIVES ISRAEL ONE WEEK. BUT WHAT IS THE REAL GOAL?

While an estimated 25000 Americans are trying to flee Lebanon, there has been a very slow reaction to the demand for evacuation, and when it does start it is estimated that only 1000 Americans per day will be evacuated.

Yet Bush has given Israel one week to finish its attack on Hizbullah.

So let's examine this.

1.Israel is attacking Lebanon because Hizbullah KIDNAPPED two Israeli soldiers.

2.The USA is very slow in evacuating its citizens from Lebanon.

3.The USA has given its full support to Israel to continue to inflict maximum damage to Hizbullah (not rescue the two soldiers)


Would the kidnapping by Hizbullah of a couple Americans in Lebanon be an interesting and attractive possibility?
Are American citizens in Lebanon now 'fair game'?
And if some Americans were kidnapped, would we believe it was indeed Hizbullah?

This would be an ideal situation for the warmongers in the USA who want war, war, war with Iran (while they sit in their country homes or New York/Washington DC appartments).

PRECISION ISRAELI BOMBING KILLS MORE PALESTINIAN CIVILIANS

When I wake up in the morning I turn on BBC or ITV for the news to find out what has happened over night or earlier that morning. Since the middle of last week BBC has been biased towards Israel in the current conflict with Lebanon. The BBC shows pictures from missiles as they fly towards their targets, or pictures from an aircraft showing the missile flying towards its target, and the missile blowing the target up. The targets were either a single building or a single truck, with nothing else nearby. The pictures give the impression of precision bombing.

So why this?

From http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/5193662.stm

Dozens die in fresh Lebanon raids

Israeli forces have been bombing targets in Lebanon for an eighth day, with at least 40 civilian deaths reported in the south and east.

Residents said an air strike killed 20 people in the southern village of Srifa, near Tyre. Police said at least 20 people died in other air raids.

Israel attacked Lebanon after Hezbollah fighters captured two soldiers in a cross-border raid last Wednesday.

At least 270 Lebanese - mostly civilians - have died in the conflict.

Twenty-five Israelis have died, including 13 civilians killed by Hezbollah rocket attacks.

One evening Newsnight showed the conflict from both sides. The view from Beirut showed a child almost dead with many pieces of shrapnel in her face and neck (presumably from precision bombing). The following morning that scene had been removed. Why?

So 270 Lebanese dead from precision bombing, with 25 Israelis dead from Katyushas. The precision bombing has killed over ten times the number of Israelis killed by the inaccurate Katyushas fired from a distance of 10's of Kms. And yet the BBC continues to portray the Israelis as operating a system of 'precision bombing' quoting Israeli officials expressing their desire to minimize civilian deaths.

PRISONER EXCHANGE, OR WORLD WAR

The current violence surrounding Israel is due to three Israeli soldiers being kidnapped.

Has Israel been involved in prisoner exchanges before, either with Hamas or Hezbullah?

Samar Assad has listed the prisoner exchanges in which Israel has taken part.

From http://www.counterpunch.com/assad07142006.html

Israeli-Hizballah Prisoner Exchanges

To date, there have been three prisoner exchange deals between Israel and Hizballah, the details of which follow.

In July 1996, Hizballah released the remains of two Israeli soldiers, Joseph Fink and Rahamim Alsheich, in exchange for the remains of 123 Lebanese soldiers. On the same day, Hizballah released 25 members of the South Lebanon Army (SLA), an army loyal to Israel. In exchange the SLA released 25 Lebanese prisoners from the Khima Prison in south Lebanon.

In June 1998, Hizballah returned the remains of Sergeant First Class Itamar Ilya in exchange for the remains of 40 Hizballah soldiers, among them the body of Hizballah leader Sheikh Hassan Nasrallah's son who was killed in 1997. The deal also included the release of Lebanese prisoners. The bodies of the Hizballah soldiers were transported by a French aircraft.

In January 2004, in the largest prisoner exchange, Israel released a total of 436 prisoners including 400 Palestinians; 23 Lebanese; two Syrians; three Moroccans; three Sudanese; a Libyan; and a German Muslim. Israel also returned the remains of 59 Lebanese soldiers. Israel received the remains of three Israel soldiers and the release of Elhanan Tennenbaum who Hizballah claimed was an Israeli intelligence officer. Sheikh Abdel Kareem Obaid, who Israel kidnapped from Lebanese territory in 1989, and Sheikh Mustafa Dirani, kidnapped in 1994, were among those released by Israel in exchange for its three soldiers and intelligence officer.

An Israeli soldier was kidnapped in 1994. Israel decided on a military option, which ended with the soldier being killed.

Israel and Hamas

About twelve years before Hamas' 25 June 2006 capture of Israeli Corporal Gilad Shalit in Gaza, Israeli soldier Nachshon Wachsman was taken prisoner in October 1994. Like today, Israel said it would not negotiate a release with Hamas. Then-Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin decided on a military option to free the Israeli soldier. The Israeli commando raid on a house in Bir Nabala near Jerusalem not only left the Hamas captors dead but with them Wachsman.

Hamas has demanded the release of all female and minor Palestinian prisoners held by Israel in exchange for Shalit.

Meanwhile Israel continues to ignore international law and hold several hundred Palestinian women and children in custody without trial in addition to the nearly 10,000 Palestinian men under similar conditions. Quoting from the same article,

According to a recent poll by the Jerusalem Media and Communication Center (JMCC), 69 percent of Palestinians insist on an exchange for Shalit's release. The high support for a prisoner exchange stems from the sensitivity of the prisoner issue within Palestinian society. The vast majority of Palestinians have been directly or indirectly affected by Israel's policy of arbitrary or blanket arrests and hold deep resentment for political violations of their leaders' authority and autonomy.

Israel's imprisonment and detention of Palestinians is an example of its failure to abide by international law and the Fourth Geneva Convention. Administrative detentions, imprisonment without due process and imprisonment inside Israel are both illegal under the Fourth Geneva Convention.

Furthermore, Palestinian prisoners are routinely tortured by Israel and held in detention centers and prisons that do not meet the minimum international standards and are routinely denied visitation rights by their legal representation and family members. The vast majority of Palestinian prisoners are held without trial. According to Amnesty International, the trials that do take place often fall short of international fair trial standards.

Israel's failure to release Palestinian political prisoners and its continued arbitrary arrest of Palestinian civilians serves only to highlight Israel's belief that it is above the law and that the Palestinians are beneath it.

The two Israeli soldiers kidnapped by Hezbullah were captured on Lebanese soil as part of an Israeli raid into Lebanon and not, as the BBC and other media are reporting, as part of a Hezbullah raid into Israel. In fact, shortly before Israel violated Lebanese sovereignty in this way Israel had prepared its response following such a kidnap.

From http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2006/3329isr_palestine_war.html

According to a report in the July 13 Israeli daily Ha'aretz, the Israel military had approved a plan for a major exercise along the Israeli-Lebanese border, based on a scenario of a Hezbollah capture of Israeli solders, after which Israel would respond with a heavy air and land assault into southern Lebanon to destroy Hezbollah. It is this plan which is now being carried out. As of this writing, Israel has begun to mobilize its reserves, including a full division, to be deployed on the already heavily fortified northern border.

This would explain how Israel has been able to put into effect so quickly such a slick operation, with ships blockading ports, the military logistics required etc. I would say from the evidence that Israel planned this months ago. They sent that patrol over the border on purpose, and I would not be surprised to learn that Israel had virtually telegraphed to Hezbullah the time and location the patrol would cross into Lebanon, or that Israel sent the patrol into an area of Lebanon where Hezbullah was known to be strong, for reports I have read mention that that patrol was not even 100 metres into Lebanon before it was attacked.

What I am trying to get at here is that there is a history of prisoner exchanges between Israel and its neighbours, although a significant proportion of the prisoners were already dead. It would appear that Israel foresaw the potential for some of their soldiers to be kidnapped by Hezbullah. Israel continues to detain and torture thousands of Palestinian men, women and children without trial, ignoring international law, and yet refuses a prisoner exchange and instead decides to bomb Lebanon back into 1975, killing innocent women and children while doing so!

WHY?

And they wonder why they are hated so much?!

In 1948 the terrorists who founded the Zionists State of Israel forced hundreds of thousands of Palestinians into refugee camps, stole their land, and continue to keep those Palestinians in dire poverty and under virtual martial law/police state rule, while at the same time being subsidized by the USA to the tune of billions of US dollars every year. Why?

Why does the USA sustain Israel so?

If you understand how the Federal Reserve works then you understand that that system cannot go on forever. It has a built-in self-destruction button. It is doomed to collapse, and that time is approaching fast. In order to create a world war more terrible than WW1 and WW2 put together a source of friction has to be manipulated. That source was chosen centuries ago; Zionism. That is why Israel has been financed, to give it an awesome death machine, but more importantly, a nuclear arsenal.

If Israel continues this action in Lebanon I can see Syria and Iran getting involved, as PNAC want, attacking or invading Israel, and in retaliation Israel will unleash its nuclear missiles. When I wrote about "The Sum of All Fears" I said that the governments and military have been infiltrated and were being manipulated by a coordinated group of megalomaniacs. The US govt has been infiltrated by the Zionists in the form of PNAC, AEI, AIPAC etc. It is their job to sustain and encourage Israel into a war in the Middle East, which could very easily escalate into a much wider conflict. The point of this war would be the same as WW1 and WW2; the creation of a world government, which would be controlled by the same people controlling PNAC etc. This world government would be accepted by the world because WW3 will be millions of times worse than WW2. It took 6 years and 2 atomic bombs for the world to accept the existence of the UN. It will take something alot worse than WW2 for us to cede total sovereignty to the UN. This must be done before those who control the USA through the Federal Reserve lose their control with the collapse of the current monetary system. Hence the rush to create the clash of civilizations between Zionism and Islam.

The choice is simple; prisoner exchange, or world war.

WILLIAM KRISTOL WANTS WAR ON IRAN

William Kristol, in his The Weekly Standard, puts forth his suggestion that the USA shoud attack Iran.

No big surprises there. Kristol signed the 20th September 2001 letter from PNAC to Bush, suggesting using Hezbullah to get to Iran.

From http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/012/433fwbvs.asp?pg=1

It's Our War
Bush should go to Jerusalem--and the U.S. should confront Iran.
by William Kristol
07/24/2006, Volume 011, Issue 42

...Thus, our focus should be less on Hamas and Hezbollah, and more on their paymasters and real commanders--Syria and Iran...For while Syria and Iran are enemies of Israel, they are also enemies of the United States. We have done a poor job of standing up to them and weakening them. They are now testing us more boldly than one would have thought possible a few years ago. Weakness is provocative. We have been too weak, and have allowed ourselves to be perceived as weak.

The right response is renewed strength--in supporting the governments of Iraq and Afghanistan, in standing with Israel, and in pursuing regime change in Syria and Iran. For that matter, we might consider countering this act of Iranian aggression with a military strike against Iranian nuclear facilities. Why wait?

WHY NO RUSH TO EVACUATE BRITONS AND AMERICANS IN LEBANON?

It appears there is no rush to evacuate British or American citizens currently in Lebanon. Why?

You would think that British and American citizens were probably in most danger, as Great Britain and the USA are strongly supportive of Israel. So why no rush to evacuate them?

A couple of reasons, cynical ones, come to mind.
1. some are taken hostage and killed and Hizbullah is blamed (though it may or not have been Hizbullah).
2. some are shot during evacuation and the killing blamed on Hizbullah (though it may or not have been Hizbullah).

There is some dark motive to this reticence to evacuate. Any military action on British or American citizens would be a perfect excuse to blame and go after Hizbullah, and thus Iran and Syria, as set out in "A Clean Break" and in the 20th September 2001 PNAC to Bush.

SURGICAL STRIKES BY ISRAEL KILL MANY CIVILIAN CHILDREN FLEEING ISRAELI TERROR

Way to go, you brave Israeli air force dudes!!

From http://observer.guardian.co.uk/world/story/0,,1821706,00.html

Children die in convoy attack as Israel widens Lebanon assault

Inigo Gilmore in Nahariyah, Patrick Wintour in St Petersburg and Tracy McVeigh
Sunday July 16, 2006
The Observer


Israel steeply escalated its military campaign against Hizbollah in Lebanon yesterday with a series of air strikes that left more than 35 civilians dead, including a single strike on a convoy of families fleeing the fighting in a village near Tyre in the south of the country that killed more than 20 people, most of them children.

The intensification of the conflict, in which Hizbollah fired missiles deep intoIsrael, came as international leaders appeared to be deeply split over how to respond to a crisis that threatens to spill over into a full-scale war involving Syria and Iran as well as Israel, Palestine and Lebanon. Last night the Lebanese Prime Minister, Fouad Siniora, declared the country in a 'state of catastrophe'.

THE NEOCONS, LEBANON AND HIZBULLAH

Lebanon gained its 'independence' from France in 1926, who had been given control of the land after WW1 through The Treaty of Sevres and the San Remo Conference. Many dispossessed Palestinians had moved into South Lebanon, to create a state within a state. The PLO, banned from Syria, Jordan and Egypt, moved to Lebanon and began fighting Israel from Lebanon. There then followed the beginning of the civil war because there were too many Palestinians in South Lebanon resented by local Shia for bringing military conflict with Israel with them. The Shia moved to Beirut to escape the conflict. Israel thus invaded South Lebanon, and was initially welcomed, but then imposed a tyrrany, and moved into Beirut. Hizbullah was formed from Shias in Lebanon to repel Israel. Israel withdrew in 2000.

So Israel was humiliated. Its awesome US-sponsored death machine had been driven out of Lebanon by a bunch of 'ragheads'.

But then something 'totally unexpected' happens : 11th September 2001.

Shortly after this on the 20th September 2001 the Project for a New American Century wrote to President George W Bush, the text of which is available at http://www.newamericancentury.org/Bushletter.htm , and which mentions Hezbullah as a target for action, which could also be used to threaten Iran and Syria.

The Honorable George W. Bush
President of the United States
Washington, DC

Dear Mr. President,

We write to endorse your admirable commitment to “lead the world to victory” in the war against terrorism. We fully support your call for “a broad and sustained campaign” against the “terrorist organizations and those who harbor and support them.” We agree with Secretary of State Powell that the United States must find and punish the perpetrators of the horrific attack of September 11, and we must, as he said, “go after terrorism wherever we find it in the world” and “get it by its branch and root.” We agree with the Secretary of State that U.S. policy must aim not only at finding the people responsible for this incident, but must also target those “other groups out there that mean us no good” and “that have conducted attacks previously against U.S. personnel, U.S. interests and our allies.”

In order to carry out this “first war of the 21st century” successfully, and in order, as you have said, to do future “generations a favor by coming together and whipping terrorism,” we believe the following steps are necessary parts of a comprehensive strategy.

Osama bin Laden

We agree that a key goal, but by no means the only goal, of the current war on terrorism should be to capture or kill Osama bin Laden, and to destroy his network of associates. To this end, we support the necessary military action in Afghanistan and the provision of substantial financial and military assistance to the anti-Taliban forces in that country.

Iraq

We agree with Secretary of State Powell’s recent statement that Saddam Hussein “is one of the leading terrorists on the face of the Earth….” It may be that the Iraqi government provided assistance in some form to the recent attack on the United States. But even if evidence does not link Iraq directly to the attack, any strategy aiming at the eradication of terrorism and its sponsors must include a determined effort to remove Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq. Failure to undertake such an effort will constitute an early and perhaps decisive surrender in the war on international terrorism. The United States must therefore provide full military and financial support to the Iraqi opposition. American military force should be used to provide a “safe zone” in Iraq from which the opposition can operate. And American forces must be prepared to back up our commitment to the Iraqi opposition by all necessary means.

Hezbollah

Hezbollah is one of the leading terrorist organizations in the world. It is suspected of having been involved in the 1998 bombings of the American embassies in Africa, and implicated in the bombing of the U.S. Marine barracks in Beirut in 1983. Hezbollah clearly falls in the category cited by Secretary Powell of groups “that mean us no good” and “that have conducted attacks previously against U.S. personnel, U.S. interests and our allies.” Therefore, any war against terrorism must target Hezbollah. We believe the administration should demand that Iran and Syria immediately cease all military, financial, and political support for Hezbollah and its operations. Should Iran and Syria refuse to comply, the administration should consider appropriate measures of retaliation against these known state sponsors of terrorism.

Israel and the Palestinian Authority

Israel has been and remains America’s staunchest ally against international terrorism, especially in the Middle East. The United States should fully support our fellow democracy in its fight against terrorism. We should insist that the Palestinian Authority put a stop to terrorism emanating from territories under its control and imprison those planning terrorist attacks against Israel. Until the Palestinian Authority moves against terror, the United States should provide it no further assistance.

U.S. Defense Budget

A serious and victorious war on terrorism will require a large increase in defense spending. Fighting this war may well require the United States to engage a well-armed foe, and will also require that we remain capable of defending our interests elsewhere in the world. We urge that there be no hesitation in requesting whatever funds for defense are needed to allow us to win this war.

There is, of course, much more that will have to be done. Diplomatic efforts will be required to enlist other nations’ aid in this war on terrorism. Economic and financial tools at our disposal will have to be used. There are other actions of a military nature that may well be needed. However, in our judgement the steps outlined above constitute the minimum necessary if this war is to be fought effectively and brought to a successful conclusion. Our purpose in writing is to assure you of our support as you do what must be done to lead the nation to victory in this fight.


Sincerely,

William Kristol

Richard V. Allen Gary Bauer Jeffrey Bell William J. Bennett

Rudy Boshwitz Jeffrey Bergner Eliot Cohen Seth Cropsey

Midge Decter Thomas Donnelly Nicholas Eberstadt Hillel Fradkin

Aaron Friedberg Francis Fukuyama Frank Gaffney Jeffrey Gedmin

Reuel Marc Gerecht Charles Hill Bruce P. Jackson Eli S. Jacobs

Michael Joyce Donald Kagan Robert Kagan Jeane Kirkpatrick

Charles Krauthammer John Lehman Clifford May Martin Peretz

Richard Perle Norman Podhoretz Stephen P. Rosen Randy Scheunemann

Gary Schmitt William Schneider, Jr. Richard H. Shultz Henry Sokolski

Stephen J. Solarz Vin Weber Leon Wieseltier Marshall Wittmann

So will the USA join in the bloodbath, and get at Iran this way, because the nuclear option is fading fast, and the PTB need to get their skates on?

THE SUM OF ALL FEARS

For all the gimps out there who have no clue what is going down watch the film "The Sum Of All Fears". Although that film deals with the potential for a nuclear war between Russia and the USA the principle is the same. There is a coordinated group of people who have infiltrated the high levels of government and military who are hell bent on manipulating a global war between Zionism and Islam. They may work for a national government, but actually wish to destroy it.

One small interesting point in "The Sum Of All Fears" is that the man in the USA who is tasked with importing a dirty nuclear bomb into the USA and transporting it to its target is "Brother Mason".

GOOD EVENING. WELCOME TO WORLD WAR 3.

Israel. Oh Israel. What hast thou become?

G*d's chosen ones are blowing little Palestinian kids to bits with new poisonous weapons, and all after they allowed a soldier of theirs to be kidnapped which could be used as an excuse for a bloodlust.

Last year when Israel pulled out of Gaza I knew something like this was going to happen, and I told the Intelligence and Security Committee so in a letter which focused on certain aspects of 7/7, whch still remain unresolved. It was obvious why Jewish settlers were pulled out Gaza. The Israeli death machine was going to blow those Palestinian kids to smithereens. "The Clean Break" document for Benjamin Netanyahu basically called for World War 3 with a massive expansion of Israel into Iraq, Iran, Lebanon and Syria. This is bound to 'upset' certain terrorist organizations who will no doubt begin blowing up more kids to smithereens. And in retaliation more kids will get blown to smithereens. And in retaliation for that more kids will get blown to smithereens. And on and on and on...

Who are the 'real' children? The children, or the adults?

This is the point of Israel. It is not a land for G*d's chosen ones to live their lives in peace and harmony. It is instead a way of kicking off a long, bloody war involving death, terror, and WMD. The way in which Israel came into existence reeks of death and blood and terror, and can only have one purpose.

This naked Israeli aggression must be stopped immediately.

IF YOU HAVE NOTHING TO HIDE YOU HAVE NOTHING TO FEAR

We are told this as the Police State takes over our lives. They want our DNA, our biometrics, even our farts!

Despite promises that this government would be more open, Saint John Reid is now preparing to toughen laws to stop whistleblowers from telling what we really ought to know about the machinations of government.

From http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,,1811134,00.html

Reid to toughen secrecy laws

Richard Norton-Taylor
Monday July 3, 2006
The Guardian


Plans for tougher official secrecy laws to prevent whistleblowers from revealing information about government policy have been drawn up by the home secretary, John Reid.
He wants to stop members of the security and intelligence agencies, as well as other Whitehall officials with access to sensitive information, from claiming they acted in the public interest and were exposing wrongdoing or unlawful acts by the government.

Ministers have been embarrassed by a spate of leaks revealing their private concerns about the legality of the US-led invasion of Iraq, including concerns allegedly expressed by Tony Blair about American tactics in the country.

THE SOMME. WHAT A WASTE.

Six days of shelling.

Two massive mines.

And then they sent the men over the top as if on parade expecting the Germans to have either been killed or scared off.

Instead over 4 months of fighting, approximately 1 million German, French and British men lost their lives.

So how did it all start?

See my page on World War 1 at http://www.theconspiracyexplained.com/WorldWar1.html

In my opinion, if your family lost a loved one at the Somme or Ypres or any other of the slaughterhouses of World War 1 then thank British Intelligence and Freemasonry (who are basically one and the same thing, set up to screw us all with a smile on their face), as well as the banks of Rothschild, Morgan (Rothschild agent) and Rockefeller for financing it all and creating an aborted world government, The League of Nations.

This is Delville Wood, taken from the World War 1 website, http://www.worldwar1.com/pharc001.htm

ISRAEL IS ON THE LOOSE IN GAZA DURING THE WORLD CUP

Israel is on the loose in Gaza, hunting down the captors of Corporal Gilad Shalit.

But is this just an excuse?

From http://www.wsws.org/articles/2006/jun2006/isra-j30.shtml

There is already substantial evidence that Israel allowed the Palestinian commando raid at Kerem Shalom to take place in order to provide a pretext for such a pre-planned offensive. Olmert has still failed to respond to statements by the security service Shin Bet that it had warned the government and the Israeli Defence Force (IDF) that such a Palestinian commando raid was planned. Instead, he authorized an “inquiry” to effectively bury the issue while military hostilities proceed.

Israel’s ability to marshal 3,000 troops and 100 tanks in a couple of days indicates forward planning. The same is true of the West Bank raids by the IDF. These resulted in the arrest and imprisonment of 64 Hamas ministers and parliamentarians and 23 military operatives, including Deputy Prime Minister Nasser a-Shaer, Finance Minister Omar Abdel Razek, Labor Minister Mohammed Barghouti, Minister Samir Abu Aysha and Jerusalem Affairs Ministers Naef Rajoub, the brother of senior Fatah official Jibril Rajoub.

...Reporting on the raids, the Israeli daily Haaretz noted, almost in passing, “The arrests were planned several weeks ago and received approval from Attorney General Menachem Mazuz on Wednesday.”

So again, it looks like a terrorist action was
1. known of in advance
2. allowed to happen
3. taken advantage of

Does this sound like 7/7?

I mean, come on, a long tunnel is dug underneath an Israeli barracks and a soldier is kidnapped?!

Israel has bombed the infrastructure of Gaza, what little there was of it, so that there is the potential for a humanitarian crisis, as if there wasn't one already. Clean water, electricity, sanitation, all gone. This is why George Galloway went on Big Brother and also why he was and still is ridiculed for it.

But who cares when 22 men are kicking a football about?

GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOAL!