SO YOU STILL THINK THAT UKRAINE DID NOT SUFFER A VIOLENT NATO SPONSORED NEO NAZI COUP, HUH?

The simple facts are these:
1. Yanukovich was about to sign a deal with the EU and IMF but changed his mind, deciding that a deal with Russia would be best for Ukraine:
2. protestors came out onto the streets, in particular Maidan was occupied by an at first determined, then aggressive then outright violent movement that was hijacked by neo-Nazi groups like Svoboda and Right Sector (who ironically the EU had warned about their Nazism) demanding Yanukovich sign with the EU and IMF;
3. the Maidan was visited by US politicians and representatives such as Victoria Kagan-Nuland, John McCain for moral and political support. Kagan-Nuland has stated that the USA has spent over $5 billion on bringing Ukraine under their control;
4. the event that kicked off the coup was a series of shootings of protestors which were fired from a building under the control of the neo-Nazis (this was an exact replica of the attempted coup in Venezuela in 2001);
5. the protestors egged on by the neo-Nazis went berserk and chased Yanukovich and the legitimately elected government away, burning government buildings as they did so;
6. the man who became the leader of this protest was Arseny Yatseniuk, aka Yats, who runs a foundation called Open Ukraine Foundation which is sponsored by that cesspit of color revolutions, The National Endowment for Democracy, as well as the US Embassy in Kiev, George Soros' Renaissance Foundation, and not forgetting everybody's favourite imperialist expansionist aggressive military organisation, NATO;
7. Yats was hand-picked by Victoria Kagan-Nuland to become Prime Minister. Guess what: HE IS!!
8. the security and defence and justice positions in Yats' government were dominated by neo-Nazis;
9. in Odessa in May the neo-Nazis chased anti-putsch protestors into a trade union building and burned them alive, shooting at those in the windows trying to escape the flames and beating to death those who survived the jump;
10. Ukraine has now signed with the IMF but still needs tens of billions of dollars so is implementing brutal austerity and flogging quality state assets and companies at bargain basement prices;
11. the driving force behind this finance is Natalie Jaresko, but do not be fooled by her surname. She is of Ukrainian descent but is actually an American, and worked in a top economic position at the US Embassy in Kiev (who sponsored Yats), and thus in my eyes is a potential CIA agent (and her business experience reinforces this suspicion).
12. in an emergency session over Christmas the Ukraine parliament voted to repeal the law to stop Ukraine joining NATO, thus taking Ukraine one step close to full NATO membership.

And amidst all this NATO Nazi plotting and burning, MH17 was shot down. Almost immediately the Ukraine Security Service released a tape implicating Cossacks in Chernukino shooting down MH17 with a BUK, and shortly after a video of a BUK with a missing missile in Luhansk. These have been used to implicate the separatists. But Belling Cat released a report in November last year suggesting that MH17 was shot down from Shizhne not Chernukino. If this was true then this would imply that the Ukraine Security Service pulled a despicable hoax on the world by releasing a tape implicating Cossacks at Chernukino, and it would also mean that any evidence that the Ukraine Security Service produce or handle cannot be relied upon.

Unless Belling Cat are wrong...

In addition to this I would like to bring attention to the overlooked fact that MH17 originated from the Netherlands, and the majority of passengers were Dutch, leading to the Netherlands leading the investigation. The Netherlands was one of the five founding members of NATO. And NATO has coveted Ukraine for decades: to control Russia's influence over Europe due to energy supply; to plonk first strike missiles on Russia's doorstep aimed at Moscow. So, of all the planes that flew over Ukraine last year the one plane that is shot down leads to NATO being in control of the investigation, and it was shot down just after the BRICS opened their alternative to the IMF apparatus that has sucked the life out of many nations and kept them underdeveloped. WHAT ARE THE CHANCES?! And Ukraine has also taken over the investigation. And yes, that's the same Ukraine whose security service released a tape implicating Cossacks at Chernukino shot down MH17. NATO media and Belling Cat are ignoring claims that fighter jets were close to MH17 when it was shot down. Dutch families of victims have called the investigation "completely botched" and asked the investigation be turned over to the UN, but for some reason this request was refused. In addition Ukraine should have closed down its airspace in May, according to the pilots association and the airlines. There are also allegations made a month before MH17 was shot down that Ukraine Air Force was using civilian planes as human shields, flying close to them while bombing separatists and civilian areas. On 14th July a Ukraine Air Force Antonov An 26 was shot down as it approached Luhansk airport. The separatists claimed they shot it down with a BUK.

I have posed some questions for The Belling Cat team in MY CHALLENGE TO THE BELLING CAT TEAM still without reply.

To me this all looks like a violent NATO-sponsored neo-Nazi coup run by Yats, who is sponsored by NATO, NED and US Embassy in Kiev, and hand-picked by Victoria Kagan-Nuland. There were military planes close to MH17 when it was shot down. Eyewitnesses interviewed by the BBC and a Spanish ATC state this. But whether the military planes shot MH17 down, or were using MH17 as a human shield, or were trying to make MH17 look like a military cargo plane by flying close to it, or they were simply escorting MH17, I don't know. Or Ukraine shot MH17 with one of their BUKs (another scenario being completely ignored). But Ukraine could and should release all communications between MH17 and any air traffic control, and also open their log books of all military flights on 17th July. The USA should also release all its 'secret' data. It is totally unjust to say "We've got the data to prove our theory but you can't see it". It's bloody ridiculous and laughable.

This was written to support the article by Robert Parry in Consortium News entitled NYT Still Pretends No Coup in Ukraine.