Saturday, April 02, 2016

THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN SLAVERY UNDER WHITE EUROPEANS AND MUSLIMS

The Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade (TAST) is the slavery that Europeans are familiar with, though it is not exposed that much. But before and during that disgusting economy, there was also a slave trade run by Muslims.

So what is the difference between the two?

1. TAST involved transporting millions of generally African men across the Atlantic for forced hard labour, but African women were also wanted, as maids, labourers and to raise families with the male slaves; but slavery under Muslims was generally the enslavement of women for harems, who were guarded by castrated male slaves, with some men forced to fight in the military;

2. but a difference seems to be that under Islam there was much more social mobility; but under TAST, once you were a slave you generally were always a slave and died a slave;

3. there appears to be less concern for slaves during mass transit across the deserts under Islam than for slaves crossing the Middle Passage.

But should such slavery as existed under Muslims excuse the trans-Atlantic slavery under white Europeans?

Particularly if you add in that:
1. Muslims did not engineer WW1 or WW2;
2. Muslims do not run Bilderberg, CFR, etc.

That just because slavery occured under Islam, which may have been more or less worse than TAST, does that mean that people like Alex Jones' ancestors should be excused and exonarated of their dependence on and fighting to defend slavery?

Many white supremacists claim that the Quran promotes and defends slavery.

But as I posted today, Liverpool Town Council paid £100 for a pamphlet written by a Jesuit extolling the very same by quoting several scriptures!!

The difference between the two is that there is little difference. Slavery is slavery, whether for forced labour to produce sugar, or for sexual slavery in a harem.

But what cannot be excused, is that Alex Jones' ancestors fought for and with slaveholder Robert E Lee to defend slavery.

So who were Alex Jones' ancestors, and what is the relationship between his family and the treasonous Confederate States of America?

No comments: