You're a journalist named Jacqui Deevoy who helped to break the story of the decade: that in 2020 there was planned genocide in UK care homes to generate the excess deaths to be cited as the reason for the rushed roll-out of an untested controversial and in many cases deadly vaccine technology.
Then a woman named Nicola Bulley disappears mysteriously, leaving her dog and phone. The woman allegedly lives in Inskip in Lancashire with her partner and 2 children. You make wild allegations that she never existed and was generated by AI.
A fellow female journalist named Anna Brees calls you out on this. She is hauled on to Jaymie Icke's show so Jaymie can make an example of Brees. But he fails. So you start a fundraiser to finance a legal challenge to Brees to shut her up.
But instead of travelling to Inskip to knock on doors, speak to neighbours, etc, you instead go to Malta on holiday.
That's some tough choice to make, innit?
Go to Inskip to prove that the woman the mainstream media is obsessed with never existed?
Or
Go to Malta for a holiday?
Decisions. Decisions.
So, did Deevoy make the correct decision?
Answers on a postcard to:
Deevoy Incorrect Decision Competition
PO Box 666
Valletta
Malta
No comments:
Post a Comment