OOPSADAISY! USA IS SUPPLYING ISLAMIC STATE WITH WEAPONS AND FOOD

Remember a few weeks ago when it was reported that, oopsadaisy, an airdrop from the USA somehow found its way into the hands of Islamic State? Well, Iraq intelligence is reporting that the USA is making airdrops to Islamic State to supply them with weapons and food. Their evidence is that Islamic State are using special armour-piercing bullets that are only available through the Pentagon.

On Saturday, Iraqi security sources disclosed that the ISIL terrorist group is using the state-of-the-art weapons which are only manufactured by the US and each of their bullets are worth thousands of dollars.

"What is important is that the US sends these weapons to only those that cooperate with the Pentagon and this indicates that the US plays a role in arming the ISIL," an Iraqi security source told FNA.

The source noted that the most important advantage of the US-made weapons used by the ISIL is that "these bullets pierce armored vehicles and kill the people inside the vehicle".

He said each of such bullets is worth $2,000, and added, "These weapons have killed many Iraqi military and volunteer forces so far."

[source : Iraq Intel Report: US Planes Supplying ISIL with Weapons, Foodstuff, Fars News Agency, http://english.farsnews.com/newstext.aspx?nn=13930825001416, 16th November 2014]

Perhaps this explains why Samantha Power said nothing about the brutal execution of Syrian soldiers.

.@AmbassadorPower but no words for the 18 other Soldiers and their families, killed that day from you. #PeterKessig https://t.co/5OiYQPirkh

— Partisangirl (@Partisangirl) November 17, 2014

The whole point of Islamic State is to oust Assad. This is why when the Kurds told NATO what the Syrian rebels were planning NATO did nothing, and Iraqi officers were bribed to order their unis to stand down and allow the rebels to seize weapons and bank accounts. This is why the Pentagon is in a phony war with Islamic State while supplying them with special armour-piercing weapons. And all this is being done because the Syrian Arab Army was beating the rebels, so Saudi Prince Bandar ran a false flag at Ghouta last year but it failed to provoke NATO into bombing Syria. Assad is delaying the development of a pipeline from the Pars field through Qatar, headchopping Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Syria and Turkey and then onto Europe to threaten Russia's business with and influence over Europe. And 9/11 was an inside job to kick off a series of wars in North Africa and the Middle East for NATO to destroy decades of development and grab control of people and natural resources.

I JUST FIGURED OUT HOW THE SEPARATISTS GOT THAT SMOKING GUN BUK FROM SIZHNE TO LUHANSK

I just figured out how the separatists got that smoking gun BUK from Sizhne to Luhansk : MAGIC CARPET!!

Now, if I can just figure out why they would want to fly a smoking gun BUK with missing missiles by magic carpet into a dead end war zone where there were loads of Kiev Nazis all desperate to find that smoking BUK...

SO DOES ANYONE HAVE ANY OTHER SUGGESTIONS YET?

In SO WHO IS LYING? yesterday I asked:
1. how could the separatists transport a smoking gun BUK from Sizhne through a war zone infested with Kiev Nazis to reach Luhansk?
2. why would the separatists transport a smoking gun BUK from Sizhne through a war zone infested with Kiev Nazis when they could very easily transport it to Krasnodon beyond the eyes of the Kiev Nazis?

I proposed two possibilities:
1. teleportation;
2. Jedi mind control.

Does anyone have any other suggestions yet?

Because the credibility of the Belling Cat report, proclaimed by NATO media and politicians to be the gospel and slam dunk evidence that Russia shot down MH17, rests on it.

I remain totally unconvinced by that report with its coloured squiggly lines drawn by the authors and references that destroy the credibility of the report itself. The report shows that a convoy of Russian BUKs travelled south through Russia near Ukraine in June, but beyond that there is nothing slam dunk to link that convoy with MH17 except a few coloured squiggly lines drawn by the authors themselves and a dodgy video whose authenticity and credibility is in serious serious doubt.

If NATO has better 'evidence' than this then where is it?

RELEASE THE COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN MH17 AND AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL!!

RELEASE THE COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN MH17 AND AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL!!

RELEASE THE COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN MH17 AND AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL!!

PETER KASSIG WAS BEHEADED BUT SO TOO WERE SYRIAN ARAB ARMY SOLDIERS

This shows the sickening bias in our media.

Obama says murder of former Soldier #PeterKassig by #ISIS was ‘evil’, but the murder of #Syria|n Soldiers not evil and completely ignored.

— Partisangirl (@Partisangirl) November 17, 2014

Peter Kassig has been beheaded. He is now the third American hostage to have his head sawn off, and the fifth 'Westerner'. But 'Western' nations such as France have paid ransoms to have their hostages released. So why have we not paid ransoms to save David Haines and Alan Henning and instead blocked Moazzam Begg from negotiating their release by detaining Begg on trumped up charges, and the Americans not paid ransoms for James Foley, Steven Sotloff and Peter Kassig, instead threatening their families with prosecution if they tried to negotiate payment of ransom?

Is it because our politicians can then cry fake tears and display fake outrage at their beheadings and demand war as retribution?

OF COURSE IT IS!!

AND THESE ARE THE SAME POLITICIANS WHO ARE SUPPORTING NEO-NAZIS IN UKRAINE!!

It is all done to get us into Syria to oust Assad.

But also shown in the latest flashy video released by Islamic State were Syrian Arab Army soldiers who were also beheaded. The Syrian Arab Army has been fighting Islamic State and their ilk for years. They were being called child murderers, war criminals by the likes of Cameron. Islamic State and their ilk have been receiving support from our governments and their allies for years: financial support from headchopping Saudi Arabia and Qatar; moral support from Cameron and Hague; material and logistical support from the USA and Turkey; medical support from Israel. And that is just for starters.

This latest flashy video shows that we should ally with Assad, not oust him.

But the reason we won't ally with Assad is because he is supposed to be ousted.

Shortly after 9/11 General Wesley Clark was told of a plan for war on seven nations in five years. Here he is stating this.


But after five years only Iraq had been 'taken out'. So in 2007 an agreement was reached between the USA, Israel and Saudi Arabia that the latter would unleash cutthroat Jihadis onto Syria, Iran and Lebanon, but were first tested out in Libya.

Assad is blocking the development of a pipeline from the Pars field through Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Syria and Turkey and then onto Europe to threaten Russia's business and influence in Europe. Assad wants a pipeline from Pars through Iran, Iraq, Syria and I think Lebanon (but don't quote me on that). But this shows the alliances of today: we in the form of our corrupt, fascist and now obviously paedophile British Government, have been supporting international cutthroat Jihadis as they butcher their way through Syria with the goal of ousting Assad to get that Qatar-Saudi-Jordan-Syria-Turkey pipeline built and Israel wants a piece of the action. This is why 9/11 was done as an inside job. This is why Zionist agents wrote of a "new Pearl Harbor" to unleash the USA onto Israel's enemies and were in powerful positions before, on and after 9/11 to allow that "new Pearl Harbor" to occur and influence the reaction to it. This is why Saudi Arabia provided the patsies for 9/11. This is why war criminal Henry Kissinger was first appointed to investigate 9/11, to cover it up. This is why the official investigation board of inquiry into 9/11 and some American politicians want to see 28 pages of a classified report into Saudi involvement in 9/11.

Assad is now a huge threat to those who planned and executed 9/11. The longer their plan is stalled by Assad the more likely their plan will be exposed.

I am exposing it, risking life and livelihood to do so, but also being surprisingly and disappointingly ostracised by some who I expected would want to help.

But do you know what? Fuck it!!

My grandfathers didn't risk their lives in Northern France in 1944 so that we can support neo-Nazis in Ukraine as they shell children in Donetsk and Luhansk, or support international cutthroat Jihadis slitting the throats of defenceless Syrian children so that headchopping Saudi Arabia and slave economy Qatar can get even richer and then invest their blood money in this Disunited Fascist Queendom!

It may not look like this is what is happening (that is if you can be bothered to look in the first place)...but it is!!

When are people going to wake up?!

Perhaps that is what this strange urge to be in London is all about?

BECAUSE THIS NATION IS SLEEPWALKING INTO A COLD-BLOODED FASCIST PAEDOPHILE LYING TYRANNY WHERE ANYTHING GOES!

Anything goes but the truth that is, but with our decadence and degeneracy, that I saw manifest and made me nauseous on 28th June this year, some I know might prefer that...even though they have children themselves.

ANOTHER WHY?

Here is General Wesley Clark stating the plan for war and regime change in seven countries in five years, those countries having nothing whatsoever to do with 9/11.



We are not being shown this daily in the NATO media (or Russian media for that matter, which raises some concern).

Why is the same NATO media which does not daily tell us this plan for war and regime change in seven countries in five years telling us daily that a dodgy report by Belling Cat, whose credibility is now in shreds, is 'proof' that Russia shot down MH17, when NATO has the world's largest and most powerful intelligence gathering and analysis network and has not deployed it to prove in a day that Russia shot down MH17?

WHY?

Why have NATO not released any evidence they say they have on the alleged shootdown of MH17?

Why are NATO relying on Brown Moses and Belling Cat to very slowly 'prove' that the separatists shot down MH17 by 'social media', when NATO has the largest and most powerful intelligence gathering and analysis network in the world and could do in one day what Brown Moses and Belling Cat have done in 4 months?

Why are NATO relying on a very dubious video of a BUK said to have been filmed in Luhansk at the crack of dawn on 18th July when on 18th July Luhansk was a war zone and surrounded by Kiev Nazis, Luhansk was a dead end, and to get any BUK inside Luhansk without being stopped and/or seen would require the separatists to use (Russian-supplied?) teleportation and/or the use of Jedi mind control on any Kiev Nazis who stop the BUK at any road block: "This is not the BUK you are looking for"?

Why is mention of the Kiev Nazis possessing BUK systems on 17th July and their deployment close to Donetsk on 17th July never made in any NATO media or any report that they promote?

Why?

Why?

Why?

SO WHERE WERE THE KIEV NAZI BUKS ON 17TH JULY?

So with the credibility of the Belling Cat report now in shreds, we can now turn to focus on where the BUK systems of the Kiev Nazis were on 17th July.

This seems to be a crucial but overlooked fact: the Kiev Nazis had BUKs on 17th July.

OK?

Got that?

The Kiev Nazis had BUKs on 17th July.

And some were in or close to the area that MH17 flew over.

So where exactly were the Kiev Nazi BUKs on 17th July?

Eh?

It's a pity Russian satellites couldn't zoom in on one of those BUKs to show the Nazi Swastikas on those BUks.

Remember them? The Nazis? Allegedly murderers of 6 million Jews?

I think, if my memory serves me correctly, we fought the Nazis in WW2. Many a British man and woman risked their life to stop the advance of the Wall Street-sponsored Nazis.

What would they think of those of us alive today supporting neo-Nazis in Ukraine as they indiscriminately shell children in Luhansk and Donetsk?

SO WHO IS LYING?

On 18th July a video of a BUK with covers removed was published which the Ukraine Interior Minister claimed was filmed in Krasnodon at the crack of dawn on 18th July. He may have changed this to being in Luhansk later.

But he is apparently wrong!

NATO media and politicians have proclaimed a report recently published by Belling Cat to be the gospel on MH17. The report explicitly states that the video was filmed in Luhansk. OK? Got that? Luhansk.

That report also cites the aforementioned video as evidence that Russia shot down MH17 because the BUK in that video is being transported on a red trailer and pulled by a white cabin which the report suggests was under the control of the separatists at the time.

The report also cites Associated Press as a reference, in particular a report published on 25th August. From the Belling Cat report:

The UAP reported on August 25th that “On July 17, AP reporters in the town of Snizhne saw a tracked launcher with four SA-11 surface-to-air missiles parked on a street. The bulky missile system is also known as a Buk M-1. Three hours later, people six miles (10 kilometers) west of Snizhne heard loud noises and then saw the wreckage and bodies from Malaysia Airlines Flight 17 fall from the sky.” Three hours prior to the time MH17 was downed was 1:20pm local time, supporting the time indicated by the shadows in the Snizhne photograph.

[source : Page 9]

But buried in that report is something that destroys the credibility of that Belling Cat report!

There is this paragraph:

One told the AP on Aug. 18 that he had seen a major new arrival of equipment traveling toward the rebel-held city of Luhansk, which is virtually surrounded by government troops and has come under weeks of sustained shelling that has cut off water, power and phone service, and led to daily bread lines.

Let's read that again because it needs to be fully understood.

One told the AP on Aug. 18 that he had seen a major new arrival of equipment traveling toward the rebel-held city of Luhansk, which is virtually surrounded by government troops and has come under weeks of sustained shelling that has cut off water, power and phone service, and led to daily bread lines.

So a reference used in the Belling Cat report itself states that on 18th July Luhansk was "virtually surrounded by government troops and has come under weeks of sustained shelling that has cut off water, power and phone service, and led to daily bread lines".

So as I asked earlier this week:
1. how could the separatists transport a smoking gun BUK from Sizhne through an area infested with Kiev Nazis to reach Luhansk?
2. why would the separatists transport a smoking gun BUK from Sizhne to an area infested with Kiev Nazis when they could very easily transport it to Krasnodon beyond the eyes of the Kiev Nazis?

But it gets worse.

On 25th July Peter Leonard apparently interviewed a separatist who stated that the separatists did it.

A highly placed rebel, speaking to the AP this week, admitted that rebels were responsible. He said a unit based in the hometown of ousted President Viktor Yanukovych, made up of both Russians and Ukrainians, was involved in the firing of an SA-11 from near Snizhne. The rebel, who has direct access to the inner circle of the insurgent leadership in Donetsk, said that he could not be named because he was contradicting the rebels' official line.

[source : What happened? The day Flight 17 was downed, AP, http://bigstory.ap.org/article/what-happened-day-flight-17-was-downed, 25th July 2014]

Hmm. Note that this source "could not be named because he was contradicting the rebels' official line". So is he for real? Bona fide? How did Leonard and this 'rebel' make contact? etc. etc. I'm not sure we can trust this. It is too convenient.

But also mentioned in the same article is the Ukrainian counterterrorism chief, Vitaly Nayda, who had this to say about whet happened to the BUK after it allegedly shot down MH17:

As for the Buk, Nayda said, intelligence suggests it went back on the move shortly after the attack.

That very night, he said, it crossed the border, back into Russia.

Note that Nayda said the BUK was moved, but did not provide a route only that on the night of 17th July the BUK "crossed the border, back into Russia".

So who is lying? Is it:

1. The Ukraine Interior Minister who says the BUK was in Krasnodon then changed this to Luhansk, both in East Ukraine at dawn of 18th July.

2. Belling Cat who say no! The Buk was definitely in Luhansk, which according to a reference that a Belling Cat report cites states was "virtually surrounded by government troops and has come under weeks of sustained shelling that has cut off water, power and phone service, and led to daily bread lines", which begs the questions:
(i) how could the separatists transport a smoking gun BUK from Sizhne through an area infested with Kiev Nazis to reach Luhansk?
(ii) why would the separatists transport a smoking gun BUK from Sizhne to an area infested with Kiev Nazis when they could very easily transport it to Krasnodon beyond the eyes of the Kiev Nazis?

3. Or Ukrainian counterterrorism chief Vitaly Nayda who said no! It went to Russia overnight.

So who is lying?

But here is another possibility: what if the BUK was located in Luhansk when it allegedly shot down MH17? But then the Kiev Nazis would have seen it being fired.

So I ask again and again and again:
1. how could the separatists transport a smoking gun BUK from Sizhne through an area infested with Kiev Nazis to reach Luhansk?
2. why would the separatists transport a smoking gun BUK from Sizhne to an area infested with Kiev Nazis when they could very easily transport it to Krasnodon beyond the eyes of the Kiev Nazis?

The credibility of the proclaimed Belling Cat report rests on the answers to those questions.

Did the separatists use teleportation which was also provided by Russia?

Did the separatists use Jedi mind control when they encountered any Kiev Nazis, telling the Kiev Nazis, "This is not the BUK you are looking for."?

This "smoking gun BUK in Luhansk on 18th July" is getting ludicrous and dangerous The Belling Cat report rests on two very dubious points:
1. coloured squiggly lines that were drawn by the authors themselves:
2. the ludicrous suggestion that the separatists would and could transport the smoking gun BUK from Sizhne to Luhansk when Luhansk was, as a reference cited by the Belling Cat report states, virtually surrounded and being shelled by Kiev Nazis, and I suggest was also a dead end for that BUK?

And to think that that report could be driving us to WW3!!

THE WORLD IS FUCKING INSANE!!!!!!!!!!

PUTIN OSTRACISED AGAIN

Here is a photo of our leaders at the G20 meeting in Brisbane (with a pleasant comment).

Everyone must know their place. Putin's not welcome at #G20 pic.twitter.com/ozE5wiXMyH

— Olga Tokariuk (@olgatokariuk) November 15, 2014

Note that Putin is on the edge of the photo again. I say again because there was a similar meeting of leaders in France in June, i.e. before MH17, to commemorate the landings in Northern France in 1944 during WW2, and at that meeting nobody spoke to Putin, and in those photos Putin is also at the end.

What is it about Vladimir Putin that NATO doesn't like?

Does he have bad breath? BO?

Why is he ostracised all the time?

I know what it feels like to be ostracised...but at least Putin knows why he is being ostracised. I still haven't a got a clue why I am being ostracised! As far as I am aware I haven't sacrificed any kittens to Satan, or something equally abhorrent.

But here is a clue as to why Putin is being ostracised. This is a map of the NATO Empire over time.



Note the progression and expansion of NATO over time.

From Checkpoint Charlie to Maidan, NATO has been expanding and expanding and expanding, most recently sponsoring a violent neo-Nazi coup. In contrast the former Soviet Bloc has been shrinking and shrinking and shrinking. Ukraine was once part of Russia. So how can the Prime Minister of Canada say to Putin, "I guess I’ll shake your hand but I have only one thing to say to you: you need to get out of Ukraine."?

If NATO wins in Ukraine then Syria will lose a major ally and then more than likely succumb to the sick, twisted and morally bankrupt alliance of international cutthroat Jihadis and NATO, and then the bastards who planned and executed 9/11 and all the wars since that inside job win.

That is the situation.

WHAT IF THE PURPOSE OF USING SUCH AN OBVIOUS FAKE WAS TO RIDICULE NATO?

No slam dunk evidence has yet been provided by NATO to prove that the separatists shot down MH17 despite NATO telling us that they have the data from 'sensors', etc. Instead NATO appears to be relying on an amateur weapons expert to very slowly prove it for them by using Youtube, when they have the world's greatest military and intelligence network, including computers, to gather and analyse data and do in one day what Brown Moses has done in four months (which at the most is to suggest, and not with slam dunk evidence either, that a BUK seen in Torez and Sizhne on 17th July came from Russia).

On the other hand, Russia has stated that it has radar evidence to show that a fighter was close to MH17 when it came down, and released that data within days of MH17 coming down.

The investigation into MH17 has been rigged: one of several nations can veto any evidence shown to the investigation team and what they publish. And Kiev has taken full advantage of this by immediately grabbing the communications between ATC and MH17 and keeping them secret.

If Russia had satellite images then they would have been released by now.

So why did Russia report on a fake satellite image at this time?

I proposed it was to reduce criticism of Putin at the G20. But we know Putin. The Guardian has called him 'strongman'. Other NATO media and politicians call him a bully. He is apparently risking WW3 by allegedly invading Ukraine, sending submarines into narrow channels near Stockholm, and flying planes over Paris. He doesn't need to be helped by a fake satellite image of MH17.

So perhaps it was reported as a prank, to take the piss out of NATO?

A wild thought perhaps, but you have to start thinking outside of the box.

At stake is Ukraine, the source of Russia's influence over Europe and thus a major source of income for Russia. And Ukraine borders Russia. If NATO can grab control of Ukraine, by for example running a violent NATO-sponsored neo-Nazi coup, then NATO can plonk first strike nuclear missiles right on Russia's doorstep which could hit Moscow in minutes. This is why the USA has spent billions and billions of dollars on fomenting revolution in Ukraine for the last 20 years.

I think, if I remember correctly, that we fought the Nazis in World War 2. My grandfathers landed on Normandy beaches in June 1944 and came back psychologically broken men. Perhaps you have similar stories in your family.

I would therefore expect nobody in the UK to be supporting the neo-Nazi coup in Ukraine in any way whatsoever.

But it appears that some do...

TWO TEACHERS A MONTH BANNED FROM CLASSROOMS OVER INAPPROPRIATE RELATIONSHIPS

An article in The Daily Mail supports the thesis that we are indeed degenarating, obsessed with sex rather than truth, as I experienced on 28th June this year when I turned up to find myself alone outside Freemasons Hall to protest their engineering of WW1 when in Trafalgar Square there was a celebration of blokes sticking their cocks up other blokes arses.

Much was made recently of Kim Kardashian and that obscene photograph of her bulbous bum, and how this kind of 'entertainment' was prophecised in the film Idiocracy. But what about this: two male teachers from the same school have been sent to prison for having sex with the same female student at that school! One taught English, the other taught...HISTORY!!!

What boring, irrelevant and untrue crap did that history teacher teach?

Having done some training to become a teacher I experienced life in several secondary schools of various kinds, and thus the staffrooms and teachers in those schools. I wrote briefly of my experiences, that there is some genuine concern over some students and questions asked and advice given on how to teach particular topics, but Jesus can their conversations be boring, self-centred and unquestioned regurgitated NATO propaganda. And to top it all off I have evidence that in one school I was in, that school had forced their students to write and draw pro-war propaganda to encourage people to fight in the Freemason-engineered World War One and other wars!!

And when I tried to explain to one particular teacher, who I thought and expected would be interested and concerned, just how bad the situation was I was, and have been ever since, ostracised, even though I know for a fact that they know I write this!

Sometimes I shake my head in total disbelief and despair...

So this extract from The Daily Mail report below does not surprise me at all.

Latest figures obtained by the Daily Mail from the Department for Education reveal that at least two teachers a month are banned from classrooms over ‘inappropriate relationships’ with pupils, while experts say the true scale of the problem is impossible to guess.

[source : The ultimate betrayal: As two teachers from the same school are jailed for having sex with the same 17 year old pupil, why ARE there so many predators in our staff rooms?, The Daily Mail, http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2835144/Why-predators-school-staff-rooms.html, 14th November 2014]

There was a report in the USA (I think) about a threesome between two female teachers and a male student. World Net Daily are following this kind of breach of trust between teacher and student.

The schools of today influence the future...and the future looks bleak.

IT IS ALL PROPAGANDA

That image published yesterday of MH17 allegedly being shot down by a fighter was fake. It was propaganda.

But it's all propaganda.

Germany started WW1? BOLLOCKS! We did.

Germany started WW2? BOLLOCKS! We did.

Osama bin Laden did 9/11? BOLLOCKS! We did.

Here is a video that should be studied and analysed and studied again and again and again. It is General Wesley Clark explaining the origin of the wars since 9/11.


Watch it.

Study it.

Look up some history.

IT IS ALL PROPAGANDA.

But at least Russia doesn't engineer world wars or fly planes into their own buildings so they can invade the Middle East for oil and kill approaching a million in the process, or unleash international cutthroat Jihadis onto defenceless Syrian children and instead actively opposes them, or supports neo-Nazis as they burn people alive or shell children in Donetsk...

SATELLITE IMAGE OF MH17 ALLEGEDLY BEING SHOT DOWN IS FAKE

The timing was suspicious. And the image was fortuitous, just like that video of the BUK with missing missiles allegedly shot in Luhansk on 18th July.

The photo was published on a Russian forum in October!!

But all this means is that Russia probably does not have satellite images of the shoot down by a fighter, otherwise they would have been released by now instead of releasing a dubious image on the eve of a G20 meeting. But they say they still have radar data.

So was this a prank by the CIA? It is possible. But surely upon receipt this would have been immediately sent to the Russian Ministry of Defence for analysis before being allowed to be released on a prime Russian TV channel? Maybe they did genuinely believe it to be real? If so then that is scary.

So was this a prank by the Russians? Well, I expressed some doubts about this image because Putin is in Brisbane at the G20, where lots of world 'leaders' are baying for his blood. Release of this image and the RT report yesterday on extra radar data were probably designed to stifle criticism of Putin in Brisbane by those world 'leaders' (most of whom are supporting the Kiev Nazis as they shell Donetsk and by the looks of things soon lay siege to Luhansk).

So where does this leave us regarding evidence on MH17? After Belling Cat released their report last weekend I expressed my doubts about that report. In its final analysis that report suggested that a BUK seen on a red loader pulled by a white cabin travelling east from Donetsk and then seen later in Torez and Sizhne was originally part of a convoy of BUKs from Russia, and that because, it is assumed, the same red loader and white cabin were filmed transporting a BUK with missing missiles allegedly in Luhansk on 18th July, and because the red loader and white cabin had been stolen by the separatists and seen in their possession at other times, then Russia virtually shot down MH17. However, the report questioned when that fortuitous video was filmed, but stated with supreme confidence that the video of the BUK with missing missiles was shot in Luhansk and not in Krasnodon, as stated by the Ukraine Interior Minister. So I questioned why the separatists would transport the smoking gun BUK to Luhansk when Luhansk was a war zone infested with Kiev Nazis, all eager to find that BUK, to the south and west of Luhansk, and Luhansk was a possible dead end for that BUK, when it would be much safer and easier to transport it to Krasnodon. But if the Ukraine Interior Minister says the BUK was filmed in Krasnodon when it was actually filmed in Luhansk, then we can question the time that that video was shot. I proposed that it would make much more sense for the separatists to transport any BUK that was in Sizhne directly to Krasnodon far, far away from the Kiev Nazis. I suggested that the BUK in that dodgy video was actually the BUK that shot down the Antonov An 26 at Luhansk on 14th July. Again, that is only a suggestion but makes a bit more sense than the separatists driving a BUK with the covers removed to show missing missiles into a war zone infested with Kiev Nazis.

This is not to rubbish the Belling Cat report. There was some good stuff in there, but it failed to achieve what it set out to do, and that was to prove that Russia shot down MH17. The report showed that it is possible that a BUK originally from a Russian convoy of BUKs was seen near Donetsk, Torez and Sizhne on 17th July, but did NOT, repeat NOT, prove that that particular BUK shot down MH17.

I think:
1. Russia probably does not have satellite images of the shoot down otherwise they would have been released by now, and their media would not have been allowed to release this fake. But then where is the evidence that NATO says it has that proves the separatists shot MH17 down?
2. this could have been a prank by the CIA, but surely the Russians would have smelled a CIA rat if one of their media received by email a satellite image of MH17 allegedly being shot down? Perhaps they weren't shown it? Perhaps Channel 1 went ahead without consulting the Russian military and intelligence community? Hmm. Doubtful.
3. so this was probably a Russian psyop to minimize attacks on Putin at the G20. But if so then surely they would have released something less dramatic but not fake? Maybe that's what the radar data was but the fake image was found to be fake.

But I ask again and again and again:
1. what about the ATC who tweeted in real time that MH17 was shot down by a fighter and that the Kiev Nazis came to his control and he has since been deported from Ukraine and fears for his life?
2. why did the Kiev Nazis grab the transcripts of contact with MH17 from ATC and have kept them secret since, only releasing portions to an investigation team who Kiev can veto on what that team can see and publish?
3. what and where is NATO's evidence?

And I repeat:
No slam dunk evidence, only a weak suggestion which I think I have weakened further this week, has been provided by NATO or anyone else that MH17 was shot down by a BUK that came from Russia.

I fully support Russia in its attempts to establish an alternative to the Bohemian Grove/IMF/NATO cabal of kiddie-fiddling, warmongering megalomaniacs, but they can do better than this!

RUSSIA RELEASES SATELLITE PHOTOS OF MH17 ALLEGEDLY BEING SHOT DOWN

Russia has released satellite images that allegedly show MH17 being shot down. The report was on Russia 1 TV. Brown Moses and his cohort of followers are desperately trying to debunk the images but as yet have failed to do so.

Here are the attempts to debunk the images so far:
1. Brown Moses jumped straight in there and said the Malaysia logo should have been over the wing. To his credit he has retweeted a tweet debunking that: a photo taken of MH17 at Schipol on take off shows that the positions of the Malaysia logos match;
2. the time stamp was inevitably attacked but the initial attacks have faltered;
3. another line of attack was the fighter jet, someone posted an outline of a Su 25 which does not match the profile of the fighter shooting MH17, but a Su 27 or Mig 29 does have that profile, and the Ukraine Air Force has those too, and they can easily reach to that altitude when loaded;
4. the one suggestion from Brown Moses that does raise concern is the image of a single cloud, but he fails to explain what happened to the other clouds in the Google Maps image when just the one cloud appears on the MH17 image.

I would suggest that to debunk today's images Brown Moses et al remember that on 17th July Donetsk was a war zone.

Can they find images of artillery or troops? Can damage and destruction on Donetsk from shelling by Kiev Nazis be seen in the MH17 satellite images that cannot be found on Google Maps? If not then it is possible that the background satellite images were lifted from Google Maps. But what happened to all the clouds?

I don't have the image manipulation software to zoom in on today's MH17 satellite images.

But there is also some vanity going down. The G20 meeting starts today. Perhaps these images and stories have been released to deflect attacks on Putin while he is in the presence of so many who want his blood, rather than in response to the interesting Belling Cat report released last weekend?

THE KIEV NAZIS ARE DESTROYING THEIR OWN CREDIBILITY ON MH17

With each uncorroborated allegation that Russia has invaded Ukraine the Kiev Nazis are destroying their own credibility on MH17.

Cannot take West seriously re: claims of #Russia's weekly 'invasion' of #Ukraine. Daily claims not even backed by their own #OSCE monitors

— Tony Cartalucci (@TonyCartalucci) November 14, 2014

Remember, it was the Ukraine Interior Minister Arsen Avakov (from the Fatherland party of rabidly anti-Russian Yulia Tymoshenko) who stated that a video of a BUK with the cover removed to reveal missing missiles was filmed at the crack of dawn on 18th July in Krasnodon, but the location has been traced to be more likely in Luhansk. And I argued yesterday that if that BUK did indeed shoot down MH17 then the separatists might as well have driven it straight into the Maidan in Kiev and placed large flashing neon signs that read, "This is the BUK that you are looking for", because the area between Sizhne, where the BUK allegedly fired its missiles, and Luhansk was a war zone and infested with Kiev Nazis who were all desperate to find that BUK, and Luhansk may well have been a dead end for the BUK because north of Luhansk was controlled by Kiev Nazis and east of Luhansk does not offer an easy route for a long wide low loader carrying a BUK. It would be much safer and simpler to transport any BUK from Sizhne to Krasnodon and then onto Russia.

But I repeat, all this is assuming that a BUK provided by Russia, located near Sizhne and controlled by the separatists did shoot down MH17. No evidence has yet been provided, by NATO or by their gofers such as Brown Moses/Belling Cat. It cannot be denied that the separatists had a BUK on 17th July. They admitted to using one to shoot an Antonov AN26 down on 14th July. Where? LUHANSK!!!

THAT IS A BIG CLUE RIGHT THERE.

Either Avakov is lying or has been misinformed, or whoever located the filming in Luhansk has, for whatever reason, got it wrong, and the Ukraine Interior Minister was right and the video was shot in Krasnodon...because it would make much more sense to transport any BUK alleged to have shot down MH17 near Sizhne directly to Krasnodon, deep inside separatist controlled territory and far far away from Kiev Nazis, rather than the dead end war zone of Luhansk that was infested with Kiev Nazis all looking for a suspicious BUK being transported by separatists!

But do these unsubstantiated allegations by Kiev of phantom invasions of Ukraine by Russia suggest that the Ukraine Interior Minister Arsen Avakov (from the Fatherland party of rabidly anti-Russian Yulia Tymoshenko) was telling the truth that the video was filmed in Krasnodon, or support the thesis that he is lying and that the video was filmed in Luhansk, as many believe?

SURPRISE! BBC DELETES VDIEO OF WITNESSES TO MH17 SHOOTDOWN WHO SAY THEY SAW FIGHTER JETS

Well, would you Adam and Steve it?

The BBC deleted a video of eyewitnesses to the shootdown of MH17 who say they saw fighter jets.

On July 23, two days after the Russian Ministry of Defense presented a radar track of a Ukrainian SU-25 fighter climbing to within three kilometers of MH17, the BBC’s Russian service aired a report by correspondent Olga Ivshina.

The report originated when Ivshina and her cameraman went in search of the field outside the town of Torez, where the US government claims an SA-11 BUK surface to air missile was launched at the Boeing 777 on July 17.

Instead of finding witnesses who saw or filmed with camera phones a SAM launch plume that would look like this test firing of an SA-11 in Russia, what Ivshina found instead were people who heard two loud explosions in the sky and described Ukrainian fighter jets near the MH17 crash scene. As Ivshina described in the opening of her report, these Donbas locals were certain the Boeing airliner was shot down by the Ukrainian Air Force.

[source : MH17 Witnesses Tell BBC They Saw Ukrainian Jet. BBC Deletes Video, Russia Insider, http://russia-insider.com/en/military_media_watch/2014/11/11/01-30-22pm/mh17_witnesses_tell_bbc_they_saw_ukrainian_jet_bbc, 11th November 2014]

And further to the data presented by the Russian Ministry of Defence mentioned in the above report, a consultancy claims to have radar data from another radar station and has presented what it says is even more detailed radar data showing fighter jets to the north of MH17.

New radar data indicating that military aircraft were in the air near Malaysia Airlines flight MH17 when it crashed in eastern Ukraine on July 17 has been released by a Russian air safety consultancy.

The consultancy provided a snapshot representing the readings taken by a radar station located in Russia’s Rostov, near the Ukrainian border, shortly before and about 20 minutes after the MH17 crash.

According to Sergey Melnichenko, CEO of Aviation Safety consultancy, there were one or two warplanes in the air close to the Malaysian airliner. The data casts doubt on the version of the tragedy favored by Western nations, which claims the plane was shot down from the ground by rebel forces with a sophisticated surface-to-air missile.

[source : Not alone: New radar data indicates other jets on MH17 course before crash, RT, http://rt.com/news/205339-mh17-air-plane-malaysian/, 13th November 2014]

Why it has taken four months to obtain and/or release this explosive data is of great concern.

Are NATO and Russia playing some kind of poker over Ukraine rather than seeking justice for the victims of MH17? Keeping their information (if they have it at all) close to their chests, only releasing it when necessary? And is this being done to avoid war?

The NATO Nazis in Kiev are preparing to launch a large offensive on Donetsk, and are claiming, once again, that Russia has invaded Ukraine. Russian troops may be gathering on the border, but not invading, and this is probably a threat to invade if NATO's Kiev Nazis launch a war on Donetsk or do something else stupid and desperate.

At stake is control over Russia's pipelines to Europe. This is why NATO is supporting the Nazis who ran a putsch and chased the legitimate government of Ukraine away, and why NATO is supporting the nastiest cannibalistic international cutthroat Jihadis in Syria to kick out Assad who is a blocking a pipeline from the Pars gas field from their ally Qatar which will threaten Russia's natural gas business with Europe. The low oil prices caused by Saudi Arabia are part of this war on Russia.

SURPRISE! USA STARTS TO SAY THAT TO DESTROY ISIS THEY MUST OUST ASSAD

Well, would you Adam and Steve it?

Once upon a time America was a good nation and a threat to the British Empire. The USA had a civil war over slavery, that was engineered by Great Britain. Slavery was eventually banned (though they certainly did take their time, eh?). And The American System of Economics led to both the USA and Germany seeing rapid and massive economic development (though in the USA this was at the expense of the native American Indians who were herded into reservations of ever decreasing size to drink themselves to death), replacing the Brutish Empire, with its reliance on free trade and slavery, as the dominant economic forces. This then prompted the British monarchy in the form of nymphomaniac bisexual degenerate King Edward VII, and their gimps such as Sir Edward Grey to engineer World War 1 and from the resulting carnage create a world government that they would control. But the USA voted to stay out of the League of Nations. It was through Teddy Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson that the USA finally succumbed to the British when they created the Federal Reserve which was run by the Hofjuden of the British monarchy such as the Rothschilds.

Since then the USA has virtually been 'the enforcer', the muscle, for the British monarchy.

9/11 was an inside job to provide the casus belli for a series of wars in North Africa and the Middle East. One of those wars was planned for Syria. A series of protests related to the US State Dept-engineered Arab Spring took place in Syria in early 2011, which were taken over by international cutthroat Jihadis sponsored by Qatar and Saudi Arabia. The violence in Syria is about kicking out Assad to build a pipeline from the Pars gas field from Qatar through Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Syria and Turkey and then onto Europe. Assad wants a pipeline from the Pars gas field from Iran through Iraq, Syria and I think Lebanon too. NATO is supporting the Qatari pipeline proposal because that would threaten Russia's relations with and alleged control over Europe. Assad wants to protect Russia's current business relationships with Europe.

So you can see where the alliances over Syria have come from.

In order to get this Qatari pipeline built requires Assad being kicked out (or his mind changed). So Saudi Arabia, Qatar and NATO have unleashed the nastiest cannibalistic international cutthroat Jihadis onto defenceless Syrian children. So on Children in Need Day today just remember this: Cameron is supporting these cannibals and cutthroats. But in 2013 after over 2 years of war in Syria, Assad was still in power, and beginning to annihilate Cameron's cutthroats. So Prince Bandar of headchopping Saudi Arabia went to Moscow to personally threaten Putin: if Putin dumped Assad then Saudi Arabia would buy billions of dollars of weapons from Russia; if not then Bandar would unleash hell in Syria to embarrass Putin. Putin refused this lovely heartwarming offer.

And so, on 21st August in Ghouta, Bandar unleashed hell in Syria.

But this false flag of Ghouta failed. There was no war on Syria, and I think we can thank Ed Miliband for stopping that planned war on Syria, and I think this is partially the reason why he is now under attack in the NATO media, on the final lap before the general election next year.

So this Islamic State entity was allowed to be created. The Syrian Arab Arny chased the cutthroats out of Syria into Iraq, where sympathetic and/or bribed officers of the Iraqi Army ordered their units to stand down to allow the escaping cutthroats to seize weapons and bank accounts, declare the Islamic State run by a former (and now brainwashed?) detainee of Guantanamo Bay, behead anything that moves and thus provide NATO the casus belli to overtly engage in military action in Iraq and Syria.

And once the bullets and missiles start flying anything can happen...

But after 2 months of a soft war on the Islamic State, the USA is now reported to be thinking that...surprise!...to destroy the Islamic State they have to destroy Assad!!

Where this illogic has come from I have no idea. The Syrian Arab Army chased the cutthroats out of Syria and has been fighting the cutthroats for years. So can someone please explain to me how destroying Assad will destroy ISIS.

It is, as Spock would say, "highly illogical".

And you can't argue with Spock!!

Unless it is all the biggest load of hairy, sweaty, old bollocks and the aim, as many of us have been saying, is to oust Assad as part of the plan to create that pipeline from Qatar which itself is part of the plan for war and regime change in seven countries in five years that was revealed to General Wesley Clark shortly after the inside job 9/11.

Though publicly administration officials continue to deny any formal review of the ISIS war strategy or any change in policy, privately there are growing numbers conceding that a series high-level meetings are in progress looking to totally revamp the Syria war policy.

In particular, officials say, there is a recognition that the previous Iraq-first strategy is untenable, and much of the push also seems to be toward ousting the Assad government alongside the war against ISIS, against al-Qaeda, and against other, miscellaneous factions therein.

[source : Obama’s Syria Review Looks to Shift Focus to Attacking Assad, AntiWar, http://news.antiwar.com/2014/11/13/obamas-syria-review-looks-to-shift-focus-to-attacking-assad/, 13th November 2014

LET'S FALL IN LOVE

Ella Fitzgerald sings Cole Porter's Let's Do It (Let's Fall in Love)


Birds do it, bees do it
Even educated fleas do it
Let's do it, let's fall in love

In Spain, the best upper sets do it

Lithuanians and let's do it
Let's do it, let's fall in love

The Dutch in old Amsterdam do it
Not to mention the Fins
Folks in Siam do it - think of Siamese twins

Some Argentines, without means, do it
People say in Boston even beans do it
Let's do it, let's fall in love

Romantic sponges, they say, do it
Oysters down in oyster bay do it
Let's do it, let's fall in love

Cold Cape Cod clams, 'gainst their wish, do it
Even lazy jellyfish, do it
Let's do it, let's fall in love

Electric eels I might add do it
Though it shocks em I know
Why ask if shad do it - Waiter bring me "shad roe"

In shallow shoals English soles do it
Goldfish in the privacy of bowls do it
Let's do it, let's fall in love

In old Japan, all the Japs do it
Up in Lapland little Laps do it
Let's do it, let's fall in love

The chimpanzees in the zoos do it
Some courageous kangaroos do it
Let's do it, let's fall in love

I'm sure giraffes on the sly do it
Even eagles as they fly do it
Let's do it, let's fall in love

Electric eels I might add do it
Though it shocks em I know
Why ask if shad do it - garcon de "shad roe"

The world admits bears in pits do it
Even Pekingeses at the Ritz do it
Let's do it, let's fall in love

The royal set sans regret did it
And they considered it fun
Marie Antoinette did it -
with or without Napoleon

TOMORROW IS KIEV NAZIS IN NEED DAY

Friday 14h November is supposed to be Children in Need Day (yet again). It will be anything but.

Several groups have claimed this day, and indeed every other day, as their own, and they receive much more support than children from HM Government.

So what will tomorrow be?
1. Children in Need Day;
2. Bankers in Need Day;
3. International Cutthroat Jihadis in Need Day;
4. Kiev Nazis in Need Day.

IT IS REALLY REALLY EASY TO GET TO SEPARATIST KRASNODON FROM SIZHNE SO WHY GO TO THE DEAD END WAR ZONE OF LUHANSK?

The allegation is that a BUK seen in Sizhne on 17th July shot down MH17 and was then very fortuitously videoed by Ukraine security personnel in Luhansk at the crack of dawn on 18th July with its covers removed to reveal missing missiles.

I explained yesterday that assuming that that BUK seen in Sizhne shot down MH17 then it was absolute lunacy, and as Spock would say "highly illogical", to drive it all the way to Luhansk because by doing so risked being seen and/or stopped by units of Kiev Nazis who were creating a corridor south and east of Luhansk to Luhansk Airport.

But one other little fact that is being overlooked is that the Ukraine Interior Minister stated that the BUK was filmed in Krasnodon. Now, keeping that BUK deep inside separatist territory and driving it to Krasnodon from Sizhne would make much more sense rather than drive it uncovered through a war zone where there were many units of Kiev Nazis all desperate to find that BUK. I mean, why didn't the rebels just drove that BUK to Kiev and place large flashing neon lights pointing at the BUK saying, "This is the BUK you are looking for"?

But on 14th July, just a few days before MH17 was shot down by whatever means, a Ukraine Air Force An 26 was shot down as it approached Luhansk Airport, and the separatists admitted that they shot it down with a BUK. And on 14th July Luhansk was essentially controlled by the separatists.

So we know that:
1. on 14th July a BUK could have been in the Luhansk area in order to shoot down the An 26, and Luhansk was under separatist control and by that time they had the red loader and white cabin;
2. on 18th July the direct routes to Luhansk from Sizhne were controlled by Kiev Nazis and that whole area south and west of Luhansk was infested with Kiev Nazis and was a war zone as the Kiev Nazis fought the separatists to create a corridor to Luhansk Airport and for control of Luhansk itself.

I am now beginning to suspect that that BUK filmed in Luhansk allegedly at the crack of dawn on 18th July was indeed filmed in Luhansk but not on 18th July. I think it was filmed a few days earlier and could be the BUK that shot down the An 26.

This would explain why the BUK was in Luhansk in the first place, because Luhansk was controlled by the separatists on 14th July, and they felt confident that they could drive a BUK uncovered through Luhansk at that time.

I still cannot think of any logical reason why allegedly having shot down MH17 with a BUK near Snizhne you would then drive the smoking gun BUK all the way to Sizhne through territory controlled and infested with Kiev Nazis to get it to Luhansk, when Luhansk was a war zone and possibly a dead end, because north of Luhansk was also controlled by the Kiev Nazis and getting to Russia going east from Luhansk does not provide any suitable roads.

It would make much more sense to keep the BUK away from the Kiev Nazis, deep inside separatist territory and drive it straight to Krasnodon over night, avoiding Luhansk in daytime, on wide roads, which is possible (as shown by the route below calculated by http://distancecalculator.globefeed.com/Ukraine_Distance_Calculator.asp).



And from Krasnodon it is much easier to get it to Russia.

But this is all assuming that that BUK seen in Sizhne on 17th July is the BUK that could have shot MH17 down, and that it came from Russia.

The explanation above explains:
1. why Ukraine Interior Minister stated the video was shot in Krasnodon when it was filmed in Luhansk;
2. why an uncovered BUK with missing missiles would be travelling through Luhansk on the red trailer and pulled by that white cabin.

The Belling Cat report provided no evidence at all that the BUK allegedly filmed on 18th July in Luhansk was part of the convoy from Russia, the only evidence that suggested this was the red trailer and white cabin, and that evidence was weak at best...but still needed explaining.

This blog has explained how it could be possible that an uncovered BUK missing a few missiles could be travelling through Luhansk. It could have been filmed shortly after the An 26 was shot down when Luhansk was much more controlled by the separatists (or it was filmed at an earlier time), and not on 18th July, because to get it there from Sizhne would mean driving it through a war zone and through territory controlled by Kiev Nazis (who were no doubt desperate to find that BUK), and Luhansk was possibly a dead end for it anyway, with the area north of Luhansk also controlled by Kiev Nazis and east of Luhansk offering no easy route to Russia for a large heavy wide loader carrying a BUK.

Either that, or the Ukraine Interior Minister was right after all and the BUK was filmed in Krasnodon, because it makes much more sense to take the BUK from Sizhne directly to Krasnodon avoiding the war zone of Luhansk and away from the eyes of Kiev Nazis desperate to find it.

But again, I must stress that this is all assuming, repeat assuming, that the BUK seen in Sizhne on 17th July did indeed shoot down MH17. It is an assumption. No evidence has yet been provided to prove this. The only 'evidence' so far is that video of the BUK with missing missiles on the red trailer. I have now provided an alternative and more credible argument to explain that video.