SURPRISE! PARLIAMENT WAS MISLED DURING THE DEBATE ON WAR IN SYRIA

During the debate on war on Daesh in Syria a few weeks ago, Prime Minister Dave Cameron did not inform Parliament of the true history of the violence in Syria, and in particular the decision to implement a plan proposed in 2012 by the US DIA to facilitate the rise of a Salafist entity in Syria to isolate Assad. Also not mentioned was that the was on Syria is just one of seven planned after 9/11 on nations who had nothing to do with 9/11 whatsoever.

But one 'fact' that Cameron raised was the Brimstone missile.

Brimstone this. Brimstone that. Brimstone the other.

Daesh would be destroyed very quickly through our Brimstone missiles.

So how is that going?

Not well, actually. We haven't bombed anything for 10 days!!

David Cameron’s bid to destroy IS in Syria is questioned again - here's why: https://t.co/9fGRChpNHX pic.twitter.com/laYetQZF6W

— Sun Politics (@SunPolitics) December 17, 2015

So lots of facts were withheld from Parliament in the debate on war on Daesh in Syria, and the Brimstone missile was touted as the ultimate weapon.

But the Brimstone missile is not being used, we haven't bombed anything for 10 days, but there is now talk of the UK putting boots on the ground to support an invasion of Syria by Saudi Arabia who unleashed the Jihadis onto Syria in the first place?!

There must be a way of recalling Parliament to re-debate the debate, or something similar.

Parliament was misled.